and the moscow patriarchate considers them to be their own and ask any local church in the world they will say that it is part of the russian orthodox church only for our political elite for our media for our faithful they say that they broke up with someone yes and in the occupied territories those the people themselves are part of the same structure, or enters into collaboration , the date remains, cooperates with the occupiers, or comes under the direct leadership of moscow , moreover, it looks as if they are asking themselves , that is, the crimean dioceses. they themselves asked well, he certainly didn’t refuse. but we know how moscow holds councils like the one where greek catholics joined the orthodox church in the 46th year. this is just the beginning, and everything else, we can easily see if the territories will be held in the

future or but as soon as the territories are vacated, you see what they do, they flee to russia, that is, they flee to russia. we have already seen these examples. we hope that more attention will be paid to this structure . at least they will try. to clean it from real agents of the russian special services or collaborators or propagandists of the russian world yes, and then maybe, let's say, with this help , something ukrainian in this structure will begin to flourish, although i still have huge doubts about this thank you, sir father heorhiy heorhiy kovalenko, rector of the open orthodox university of st. sophia of wisdom, was on the

air . i congratulate you, mr. oleksiy, well, let's try to understand what is happening with the protests that do not subside in china, the chinese government, in principle, for the first time, i would say for too many years and made certain political concessions. changing the policy of zero tolerance to the coronavirus, which in principle is the real problem of these protests. and by the way, they have already started to say that this is a real problem, even newspapers and online publications such as south china morning post today already printed a big test about how the lockdowns in xinjan caught

millions of people uh in a trap so close to the late press never expressed whether it was a change of policy or a temporary relaxation well look i still think that this is the beginning of a relaxation of a long relaxation i think that it will last until spring, and unlike western observers, for example, i did not give those protests too much of a political color, although it was present there, but still after all, the protest's driving forces are related to the fact that , after all, these are anti-government protests, the protests of people who are tired of sitting in quarantine and this quarantine . the leadership of china because

next week siddimpin is going to the middle east and in principle the issues are related to lockdowns, they basically go down to the provincial level, this is not a problem of the actual leadership of the party or the government of china, in principle everything is solved on vocal levels and we can see right now that these relaxations are uneven in some cities, well, they are starting to allow without qr tests, gps, well, tests in transport, others, on the contrary, do something else, and the rest do nothing at all, so we can’t say that it is nationwide, so now it is really , that is, in those cities, those few, let's say dozens of these cities, where protests took place, there is indeed a relaxation, in return, these are still, i think, decisions that are made not at the gari itself, but at the local level, just to knock down this

here you are, you can shoot down this protest mood, let off some steam, so to speak, well, you understand, there is another question here. many of us talk about the far-sightedness of dvinkina as such an experienced leader, who at least understands the problem of his own regime, which we now, in principle, see all dilpin is the main thing the narrator of this policy of zero tolerance to the coronavirus, the chinese see how the whole world is returning to a more or less normal life in china, this is not happening. china did not import enough vaccines and did not produce enough the number of vaccines at the national level, the chinese economy is in a difficult state. in connection with this policy of zero, the head of the people's republic of china, as you say, goes to the near east and thinks that everything is fine with him, but the problems of the state with or without protests they are obvious, he would you can see it. if he was such a brilliant

manager even at the level of the communist nomenclature, look here, this is not a matter of his competence, let's say, when the crisis began , such a person was really created under his leadership. the headquarters, let's say, what kind of virus did idemy cure now, it's not a problem of national importance that he has to solve it, it has to be solved by the government and the provincial government, i'm saying. that is, it's not a decision of sisinpin, sisinfin can say yes. okay, he's already at the last meeting. as you know on the first of december from charm-michel, he said that micron is not dangerous , that is, he said that not despite the fact that now there are 40,000, somewhere around 30 horse or 31,000 new cases of the disease, now the government is saying ok, this is another stamp, let's move on to this one, let's say well, for relaxation. although, as we can see, the chinese do not have it. that is, we already have this mass, let's say,

resistance to this virus. the chinese who were in quarantine do not have resistance, and therefore i think that even if it will be canceled very quickly in these restrictions will be a major disease outbreak in china, and therefore the authorities still understand this . i think that they will not be, why do i say that there will be a gradual lifting of restrictions somewhere, which now has started somewhere before march, probably until maybe later . and tell me what to say specifically about the political side of it what is happening in society, but recently you and i all watched how in china they reacted to the death of the former chairman of the people's republic of china, the general secret of the central committee of the communist party of zen zamin, and it was possible in these comments, eh, often nostalgic , often on the contrary, more directed eh- in reality , one can see a certain misunderstanding of the policy of

the current government, an attempt to oppose dzian zamitya, who, in my opinion, was still a conservative leader, he cannot be called a great a supporter of primarily political reforms to the current regime of shizenpin. although i just see the zemfina world as such a direct heir of this rigidity, the day of the replacement, but for the chinese, the death of the former president of the prc is a reason to say , you see, there was more of a regime of hope, and now a regime of hopelessness, so to speak, well, look really it was very interesting for the chinese to live. it was a time when they had it was good, that is, there were party members, there were opportunities to get rich, to create companies, there was no such thing as tough, even tough at all regulation of all spheres of life, yes, that is, i think they miss exactly that, that is, every leader, you remember that the past funerals of all the past, let's say , such famous relatives, they actually led to a revolution there in the 70s, in the 59th year, and that

is, that is they compare, they say yes, it was better before and they compare with that leader and say yes, we are already better off about them, they mention that something was better although i say that this is such a characteristic of the chinese although they very clearly understand, for example, that the era or a day would have a duna it was not better than it is now, although they are very afraid of a return to a definite return to the practice of practice, uh, state regulation of people’s lives, of course, uh, let’s be more careful, let’s say it’s impossible for the president to say, it’s just that there were no such technologies it's mine, i think i also used it, it didn't have the technical capabilities well, of course , now it's digital, let's say digital totalitarianism

, you can say and tell me let's try to understand what's happening around taiwan because the state department has repeatedly said that china can start a war, many emphasize that in fact taiwan has much more serious business ties with china to imagine a real armed conflict between these two chinas , taiwan itself on the one hand says that on on the other hand, we can see that in the midst of taiwanese society itself, such a vision of a real threat is not felt if you look at the comments of ordinary people. they do not really believe in this war moreover, they are ready to vote for these political forces that are closer to the people's republic of china than now the thai government, you know the results of the last local elections, not in taiwan, they again brought victory to the kuomintang party which historical

has its own special very specific but dialogue with the communist party of china, they talk like this with the times before the civil war and after the civil war, and in principle it is similar to the party so that they do not speak there, but one way or another, how do you assess that there may be an armed conflict, my position is let's if my personal position is that i consider taiwan and china, the mainland and the island, as two parts of one chinese nation and one way or another. yes, this nation also fell apart during the second world war, the civil war. "to connect" and his main slogan is the revival of the chinese nation. the revival of the chinese nation includes unification with taiwan, that is, then the task that some izinfin set for himself in the 12th year yes that is, 10 years ago, to unite

the nation is his slogan. and here he really coincides with the taiwanese nationalists, the kuomintang, who are also nationalists, and this is exactly what is happening . i think that the communist party is moving towards a nationalist dialogue that is understandable to the nationalists of taiwan, and on this they can now really build something new, of course if just capture the island by armed force, there are 4 million and zhivotsky people against as we know one and a half billion china, what 2 million army according to official data, i.e. there are no problems for the military i think operations to capture the territory but in this sense , that is why i do not believe in a military operation, because in this sense zizipin's idea of ​​​​the revival of the chinese nation will be destroyed, and that is, i do not think that it will be destroyed precisely by starting an invasion of taiwan, but another question is that he can really be provoked

to do this and they will do it, and they want to provoke it, it is not those who clearly understand that without taiwan, yes, without or with an attack on taiwan, yes, this idea, his ideology, all of it will be destroyed, and that is why i think that just asking is being provoked for that for him to make a very quick but unpopular decision to start an invasion. china refrains from this. as you know, he did not react as we know how they were waiting there for business cards of moose for the visit of others, on the one hand, he did not react, on the other hand, he changed the military status quo because that now the presence of chinese ships in the gulf and constant maneuvers, it has already become real , it was never like this before, yes, he is doing this because he can not buy, because then he will also be considered weak, you understand. he very clearly has to show that it is its territory, the taiwanese are an integral part of china, and this is recognized by the majority of the countries of the world,

including ukraine and even the united states, and therefore, in principle, china simply does not want to be provoked into such a conflict, you see, and here is the problem, that is, they do not see problems in the taiwanese the taiwanese will not provoke this conflict, the taiwanese, after all, i think they understand that this conflict should not be between the chinese and what is their taiwanese name. on the other hand, well, the chinese are directly called a provocation for conflict, yes, otherwise, sisinfin clearly says that we are ready to talk for decades about how to unify taiwan and the unification plan, and vanya and the pain. for example, between the unification of east and west germany when one country absorbed another and here a completely different model is proposed one country two systems that is, but this church is a model one country two systems it was

used when great britain returned hong kong to china well, yes and i would not say that it you know, it looks like a very convincing example for taiwan today when we see what is happening from hong kong i mean with democracy in the needle i agree china is not following the fact that it started baking the rules of the game in hong kong for half the term before you learned not to interfere for 50 years but started the changes only after 25 , but he was also actually provoked by the protests that took place two years ago. i followed the same rights, so what is the problem, thank you, thank you, mr. oleksii oleksii kovalchuk , the head of the ukrainian association of cat scientists

, we were in touch and we talked about current problems related to the political situation in china. now i will try to answer a few questions serhiy shinkar and vitali, december 5 and in fact tomorrow is another anniversary of the signing of the budapest memorandum, an act that was joked about by no less than the pro-russian military korabel. but don't you think that ukraine should not involve itself in any semblance of a system of collective security. and it is better to form international coalitions that will set the task of destroying the russian empire. the first question is the budapest memorandum - it is not a system of international security. it is a system of conditional guarantees that were connected with the obligation of the former soviet republics to hand over these elements of nuclear weapons that they had in ukraine, these are generally delivery systems for old

weapons to one of the former soviet republics , because it was clearly decided that in the event of a schedule of the soviet union, the international community will recognize nuclear states only if there is no proliferation of nuclear weapons, if, relatively speaking , instead of one nuclear state, four states will appear, but there should be four. the russian federation, the republic of belarus, ukraine. the three countries had no chance either to maintain or to maintain these elements of nuclear weapons that were on their territories, they were still elements of nuclear weapons of the russian dish, so in this regard, of course, it is possible believe that we should want more serious guarantees according to the budapest memorandum, however , the transfer of nuclear weapons elements by ukraine is an elementary payment of ukraine for its independence, otherwise ukraine would have remained a part of the russian state and today we would be talking to you as citizens of the russian state. the russian federation is a union of sovereign states, but we all started in this union of sovereign states, and this would be a reality

that everyone would have to accept because all the others states would consider that a nuclear war is not worth the independence of ukraine or kazakhstan, once again, the north atlantic union is the only effective collective security system that can guarantee that the ukrainian state will exist in the foreseeable future, that the territories of the ukrainian state will not become part of the russian federation, we know that the russian political leadership in the russian people, this is an ambitious goal, they will implement this method even at the cost of expelling the ukrainian people from those territories that are in russia are considered obvious territories of historical russia , only the system of collective security can help ukrainians to stay on their land in relation to the international coalitions that have become here for the task of destroying the russian empire, then ukraine cannot create these coalitions, today bolgana is a country that is not a member of collective security systems, it is not a rich country it is not a country with its own weapons

. a depopulated land with a smaller population and reduced economy. ukraine in such a situation will be a suburb of civilized education and not its center , because russia will then enter the sphere of influence of china, which we just talked about, and people must really understand the weight of such a country in the world and understand that the future of this country, its very existence depends on the extent to which it succeeds in becoming a part of collective security systems such as nato, if this does not happen, there will be new wars in the future, new destruction of the economy, new eh expulsion of the population. i think that you and i should prevent this even if the hostilities at this stage of russia's struggle with ukraine and other former soviet republics end, because we are only at the beginning of tragic events, so do you

think the belarusians are capable of killing ukrainians as the russians did it is the merit of lukashenka that the belarusian army remained in his country, or he could not do otherwise to get belarus to the wedding, it is obvious that the belarusian dictator does not want the belarusian army to take part in the war because belarusian society does not want this war, this is a fact, the vast majority of belarusians are not going to participate, are going to support this war, and for lukashenka, it is better to refrain from direct intervention of his army in this war . you see, ukrainians themselves can kill ukrainians, a huge number of people mobilized from the territory of the donetsk luhansk regions of ukraine, let's say ukrainian citizens with fake passports of russia or the dpr of the lpr but these are ordinary ukrainian citizens, a large

number of them absolutely did not want to join any army, but were forced to do so when there were mass raids on the civilian population of the occupied territories, so that ukrainians are capable of killing ukrainians and belarusians are capable of killing ukrainians when a person is given a machine gun and they he doesn't have much of a choice , because she is already in the army and she has a choice either to beat her own or to shoot at other people's people, then of course she will shoot and there is no need for any illusions about this, it is very important for us to keep belarus from participating in the war, and this is also understandable to her, although joining the belarusian army will in no way change the strategic situation at the front , recently there has been a change in the rhetoric of germany in the person of scholz on the situation in the war with the russian federation. what is the reason for this change and is it a real change of benefit is this a new diplomatic game about the real lack of desire for support? i believe that

this time the federal republic of germany will do a lot to support ukraine and the military and economic political and change and position in the first during the months of the war, it is obvious. i am surprised by the ingratitude of many of our citizens who cannot understand that if it were not for the support of the west, they would not have written all these questions, but were mostly in umogi and lakh together with their friends and relatives. and their cities have long since turned into ruins or regional centers of the russian federation and i call on our fellow citizens to be grateful and not to repeat the sad experience of the soviet union, whose citizens were the vast majority of those who write all these questions and posts and who could never really to inflict on the allies with help during the second world war, without which the soviet union would have been captured by hitler's germany, its population would have been halved and its industry would have been destroyed and etc. and etc. and etc. and maybe

russia would have remained beyond the urals somewhere at best in ukraine and belarus turned into protectorates of the reich and service personnel of the hitlerites, but there was never any gratitude to anya for his forest, anya for military aid, anya for the fact that the soviet soldiers were fed during the first years of the war with american help, do not repeat the sad examples of the bolsheviks and do not invent that the west does not support us, without the west the ukrainian war would have ended long ago not the way we wanted. so i think that when the federal cashier on the one hand says that germany will never recognize russian ambitions on ukrainian territory on the other hand , he says that in the event of the end of the war, it is necessary to return to the pre-war order, then this is essentially diplomatically playing with vladimir putin

. we are talking about a tribunal after which no one will have any desire to speak with you anymore, this is also absolutely real political activity and so on, and from this point of view i evaluate the statement of emmanuel macron regarding the provision of security guarantees for russia in the event of peace negotiations that may be security guarantees for a terrorist country these are the security guarantees that will put an end to the naturalistic efforts of the russian federation. i understand that a large part of the audience lives in the same and real utopian world in which a large part of the citizens of the russian federation itself lives, and when they say that, the victory of ukraine is primarily the restoration of territorial integrity or the control of those territories with which we can still win back the russians, and with the subsequent accession

of ukraine to nato, many people are offended and start saying that how is it that we are not we will be in moscow and that there will be no destructive processes in russia well, at least imagine the situation option well that our army will not be in moscow, the capital of a nuclear state, and that there will be no destructive processes in russia, and the president he will be the president of the russian federation for another 10 years before his death, the conditions say and then his successor will be the same chekist who will hate ukraine, do you dream of destroying it, what are the tools for the existence of ukraine in such a territory in such a configuration, well, you have to think about it too, can the subscriber of macron's policies thinks about this and believes that the appeasement of russia will be precisely in the joint package before the solution of such an issue. when ukraine also receives security guarantees, and together with this, russia returns to the existence that will ensure putin's continuation of his power after the defeat in the

ukrainian war. this is an absolutely logical approach and one must live in the real world in a world in which everything is just beginning for ukrainian citizens and not only for them. and i assure you that all former soviet republics can also become part of russian aggression this must be understood and this must be resisted; we must do everything possible to stop the war, restore the territorial integrity of ukraine, give us security guarantees, and prevent russia from advancing further on the post-soviet space, and if part of these actions will be an agreement between the west and russia on the collective intervention of russia, then this also invents for us one of the directions of the outcome of the situation. i simply believe that russia will not agree that as long as it has the resources, it will do its best to destroy ukraine, another former soviet republic, even by expelling the entire population of these former soviet

republics to europe or china, but i do not think that we should agree with this and consider that this is a situation that cannot be overcome, so that in this is an absolutely obvious thing, which in your opinion is evidenced by the situation with kateryna polishchuk ptashka, when she was harassed in social networks because of her political support for volodymyr zelenskyi. in general, i believe that no one needs to be harassed in social networks, no one needs to be hidden in social networks for supporting volodymyr zelenskyi, no one needs no one needs to be bullied on social networks for supporting petro poroshenko; no one needs to be bullied on social networks for supporting yulia tymoshenko, if we were in a democratic country, we would have had a government a long time ago of national unity, petro poroshenko would head this government under president volodymyr and zelenskiy, and yulia tymoshenko would be the head of the verkhovna rada or vice versa, and it would be absolutely accurate, correct , civilized like this

. connected with the desire of our enemies to destroy all ukrainians and destroy the entire state, and it is absolutely obvious that what was being said was absolutely true, these warnings that were addressed to those parts before 2019 society that believed in the possibility of an agreement with putin should also make this part of society more realistic, allow it to open its eyes and understand the pitfall we have all reached in 2022. this real reaction did not take place, we did not demonstrate that we are a society of national unity from a political point of view, but from a social point of view, they demonstrated from a political point of view that they passed this as a test for two, and it will definitely slow down our process of european euro-atlantic integration, but it is not yet time to return to civility, there is still time for the post-soviet state to turn into a european country , and the reluctance to harass anyone on social networks

is an important sign of such civility, to which i always call all supporters of the current government and the active president and supporters of other political figures of ukraine, national unity , joint responsibility for leadership countries and joint responsibility for these difficult and unpopular decisions that will have to be made in the coming years can save ukraine from internal conflict from fragmentation from internal struggle and quite serious, all this still belongs to ukrainians to realize and experience after the end of hostilities, serious trials will begin on the very day when we say victory and they will be no less large-scale and difficult than those trials that ukrainians experienced during the war and this must also be realized, no one should have any illusions. i say once again, is there a

cure for this whole nightmare, there is a cure, there is always national unity, olive oil is a wonderful medicine not even very bitter. and if you do not want to take medicine, you will die, so i advise you to take medicine and be treated right now. thank you, dear friends, i am leaving our air with you and i will pass the word to my dear colleagues, ani eva melnyk, who will provide you with information about the news of this withdrawal of our city from of the general staff details in a few moments, stay with us, two missile strikes and 10 strikes from multiple rocket launchers were fired by the occupiers at the positions of the ukrainian defenders