courses there for industry and for everything else and for military power, because the military power there is much greater and the tactics of small cuts can lead to the exhaustion of ukraine itself, what is the problem, you understand, but this is our problem, there are mountains, yes well, they help us, er, we say that give us better long-range weapons instead of putting out fires and bringing generators like this. well, this is a political issue , and how do ukrainian politicians perceive it? now in the states, do they have any questions about what is happening in ukraine or do they trust 100%, why do i think those who this is the most important thing, those who come here and who come sit with the president or the administration or with the military uh-uh, they will very realistically understand, see for example ireland, if there is no agreement in hungary, a conversation with the ambassador of ireland there , he said, look, for the first time in history, the

prime minister visited - the minister of ireland this summer and never and never in the history and, well, modern history of ireland, she supported the country so much with the military because they are aiming at the notary. ireland is not nato. i think the most important thing is why our advocacy companies are there not only so that they can familiarize themselves with those newly elected members of congress or even white house advisers, but to visit ukraine as much as possible, you cannot sit and say well, you will survive this, everything will be fine come and let your mobile phone ring with this alarm and hide in the basements feel us feel personally and sit close with the children as well what do you understand how they have been going through this for several months this is not normal and what do you have

the possibility that you americans have the biggest arsenal of weapons, i think they should feel about arsenal weapons, this is another problem because in my opinion and our experts in your tone that's why there was a new contract with reitin. and everything else that we transfer to ukraine is everything that already exists, as such a war has been going on for more than 8-9 months and the factories of new weapons do not prepare water and only to transfer to france and germany, as they transfer old weapons like us so long we are waiting and they didn’t rebuild the new weapons, did they wake up the factories like in the second world war, there was an arsenal of democracy, america handed over all the weapons to the world, and our factories still

don’t work on such a brink, and america is directly in the war because putin is already there well, he imagines, he tells himself that he is fighting with nato, they haven't started yet, yes, yes, this is a joke, this is, well, i mean, in terms of budgets, in terms of defense production, america allows well, somewhere hypothetically, participation in the war, or will it be the third world, well, what it is this war that will go beyond the limits problems of ukraine i am not talking about this matter as the third world war, but the third world even as america came as our heroes quickly against the russians. i don't know how america is . the third world war is really like when there will be no need for wheat and ukrainian food in the whole world, and then there will really be

other countries, including, but what is it that america and nothing that russia wants america now, now, america will not be, well , 100%, or now, now i will send no soldiers i think, first of all, we would but ex-military americans as contractors, and contractors to repair, how do we separate those emon abrams tanks, like us, and such big cars, americans, american cars , we bring here finally and so it must be finally, i think we will need some experts they know how to be skillful in repairing so that they would be here. yes, but it won’t be, as they tell me in your tone, it wouldn’t be. they are currently active in the american armed forces. therefore, they are veterans who will now be contractors, so it may be a little more expensive but america can say that we don't have our

soldiers now, so would i. i'm still waiting last summer . there are attachés in the territory of ukraine, yes, but he is not at the level to control anyone, as putin really says that america controls the war, well, he is a colonel, not a full general. and we would like to see that i can be any military man so that at a higher level and not that the colonel doesn't know, i don't want to elect him , but as a person who can support a mobile phone and immediately turn to any leader, he says that we urgently need such and such and such, but now there is no e p andriy yesterday, the influential british publication defensaltimes recognized volodymyr zelensky man of the year, they compare him with winston churchill, they say that he is the complete

opposite of putin, who wants to restore something old don't you see the danger and usurpation of power within ukraine itself in this zelensky fascination with the world? well, although it is a small one, there are problems with it. well, for example, three ukrainian information channels that have no relation to zelenskyi 's team have been excluded from the digital airwaves. those who have a relationship, they speak in full. ukrainian parliament meetings are not broadcast in our country, even in the recording, you can not watch them even in the recording, what is happening there, who says what, who votes for what in our country on key issues leading positions in the country are still appointed by representatives of one political team . people there are close to the volodymyrets team. in principle, this is probably correct in the conditions of war, but then

the war will end. words and work with the ukrainian parliament. you feel a certain danger that this passion can lead to negative consequences for

victory in the world and then go on and have politics and budgets. apparently he already wants to go to sparta, i don't know exactly what will happen after the war, but yes, those things are important, but equally important. i think i'm lonely so that you can help me. europe visits in my opinion more than america, they should be here powerfully not only to see the weapons, not only to feel what is happening here, but also humanitarian because i have to say that even and what is this non-governmental organization there are billions of dollars in

the budget last year in america for a humanitarian which i don't see. not a single american flag . everything goes through the un. everything goes through other international stages. well, how does this exist? what money is there? we need a check in america. have you transferred enough now, now urgently in the winter? is there any money or something else ? there are billions of dollars in humanitarian aid now, now that the ukrainians are freezing, what can we do urgently because some countries i know, i passed through hungary, we know there are problems with the hungarian government, but they have never stopped humanitarian aid, and i know how many are transferred from different borders, and i would like an inspection in washington, not only some people say we need to check where those weapons are going. i would like to know where this humanitarian woman is or if she really transferred from the american cash register so that we can only

subsidize the red cross and other organizations, well that's it it's interesting. yes, but it's very important for us. now this civil sector has crystallized, so it doesn't have to be through rental organizations, it can be public organizations. we thank our great volodymyr yelchenko, a diplomat, constantly the representative of ukraine at the un for 15-19 years and the extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine to the usa for 20-21 years volodymyr good health we congratulate you good health i congratulate you all, gentlemen . threats of usurpation of ukrainian power by our western partners defensaltimes already recognized zelensky as the person of the year in 22, accepting him from scratch, are there threats to usurpers of power in ukraine now against the background of the fact that both

western society and ukrainian society he admires the purely military victories of the ukrainian government, but there regarding the victories in the fight against corruption, regarding the judicial reform, regarding the change in the country's management system, regarding the formation of the government , the change system, in fact, there are not so many victories, please, well, you know, i can partly agree with you, we are in this it is quite effective explanations. the fact is that during the war it is clear that some issues are put on the back burner, this does not mean that the fight against corruption or judicial reform or the same reform in the security service of ukraine even if it didn't sound funny during the war, but they shouldn't be on the agenda, it's another matter that first we need to achieve a military victory on the fronts, and then all these issues will return to the agenda, one way or another, we

have to understand both the government and society that no one is aware of these problems, that is, if we are talking , and we are already talking about joining nato, and not only us, and this dosekt is saying this after the war, if we are talking about the full integration of the already final radiation into the european union, then no one from all reforms will not be done and no one will write us off , well, let's say war if after the war we don't start or rather continue these reforms at a much faster pace. early , we have to win the war, the war means the need for consolidation, that is, the same criticism of the government, and it seems to me that everyone approaches this issue much more constructively than if we remember the first days or weeks of the war. when

these clashes began again, where is the government and where is the opposition between position of power, then this is all so, so, a little under er-e, it took a back seat, and that's normal, because now society should be unified and consolidated more than ever. and what is the strategy of the united states of america in this regard with regard to ukraine, considering the latest news about the modified heimers about the reduced range, er, well, that is, they will give us just enough to survive, so understand correctly, we did not win finally, i don't think that it is possible to ask this question so directly. well, look at the same washington, and i can confirm my words to mr. andrii. i don't know much better than the situation

, well, we've been studying all the time it will be two between er, well, such two schools of thought er, some political scientists refer to one school, let's say, sullivan to the other - it's blinken and austin, the minister of defense and the secretary of state, that is, the difference is that some believe that er, this russia in this war, russia cannot win, and they believe that ukraine does not have anything else the right to lose, that is, there is a certain difference here, and i think that the antonym prevails in your opinion now that russia must lose, and for this it is clear that ukraine has this russia to win, and for our ukraine to defeat that russia, more weapons and more help are needed and this is being done, i think. well, i just think. i have been saying this for so long on various broadcasts, including yours on express, that there are

things that we will probably learn about only after the war , and if we criticize the west or its partner, the united states, that it is not enough. of help, it is partly understandable this can be explained, but in fact i think that we are able to do much more and much more effectively with weapons than we know about it and the mass media and evidence of this we saw yesterday and literally in the last days the same crimean bridge and everything else and in general this the phenomenon of cotton. i think that after the war we will learn a lot of interesting things about what kind of help was actually given to ukraine . volodymyr, if not. only you can use your own weapons and those weapons that are given to them as help and very effective soldiers, with their professional day

, we wish them victories and return alive from this terrible war. in the united states and in general in the world in europe, is there an understanding and what to do next with this defeated russia, or leave it in the same territorial composition as now, or leave its nuclear weapons, or leave it at its head? just replace putin with some other putin second third fifth and leave everything as it is because i have never heard from anyone from our western partners what to do next or is it possible that there is a secret plan that you just don't know yet you know i think you are right to what else the west has not yet matured, unfortunately, but this understanding will come. well, you know, this proves to me that there is a complete understanding of what to do with this northern bridge, i don't think

anyone has yet and there is confirmation of this literally the day before yesterday, another example is the president's statement macron of france, who again began to talk about some security guarantees for russia, that is, uh, well, it sounds especially cynical, when on this day, literally, he is carrying out another tourist attack on ukraine , again, 70 missiles, again, the destruction of this structure and the death of two people, why are civilians again not carries absolutely no difference and is a threat to the armed forces of ukraine. that is, it is, well, it is destroyed purely, it is free things, and literally in this family, the macrons are talking again about the fact that russia needs russia somehow, and you better give some guarantees because she deserves this. this confirms the fact that there is no understanding, there is fear, you know, this reminds me of the situation at the end of 1991, and by the way, that's when

russia jumped into this train called the united nations organization, simply taking the place of the soviet union once upon a time. precisely because no one understood what to do with it. well, with what remained of the soviet union, they turned a blind eye to many things, including allowing russia to become a member of the security council. systems or activities of the international system of collective security is blocked precisely by the russian federation because uh, for all the years, for 30 years, russia has more than uh, more than once imposed on it various decisions of the un. and where is the security of the un than all other permanent members of the danger, together we took and this is a paradox and everyone should understand it. yesterday i listened to the conversation of some experienced political scientists, including former russians. well, they

are now in the opposition. they said that this was a mistake in 1991. it should be done now. corrected done in such a way that it is impossible to reform the existing system led by the national ticket organization as long as the russian federation sits there, that is , something new must be created, and this is something new, and this surprised me very pleasantly. well, to which they include the cold war as the third, and the current one is already called the fourth world war , they always created new systems of new universal organizations, those states that won, it was like that after the first world war, it was the entente, it was like that after the second world war, it is actually the soviet union, the usa and great britain, well, excuse me for such a word, directly attached to them, france by

stalin’s decision. by the way, because france, to be honest, had nothing to do with the victory of your war, on the contrary, but that’s not the point. and you’re fine fought against the hitlers, so it means the cold war or the third world war, those people gathered there, i remember correctly, bush, igor bychov , and they decided something, and as a result, an organization was not created, but in principle there there were certain reforms. and finally, this is the so-called fourth war, and there are winners right there. well, i will say. so what did he say? well, i said. and these people i listened to are three plus three - this is great britain, and here, let's say the historical significance of the figure who fights with the joneses. this is the united states of america and ukraine, plus this is poland , the baltic countries, some other countries, we have

great respect for all the others here, the european unions, nato, as uh, regional organizations, let's say, that is, something new must be created in which there will no longer be a place for russia in the same way as not there was room for the soviet union, the former was already at the same time. well, we hope that russia will become the former at some point, whether it will develop or become a distraction. and the fact that our western partners are afraid of this, well, that can be understood. but after those failures, there are no outright failures on the front in the foreign policy of the russian federation i think that they should understand that this is absolutely not the kind of country that should be feared, why every minute a diplomat is a permanent representative of ukraine at the un, an extremely empowered ambassador of ukraine to the united states in the past years thank you for your participation, mr. volodymyr, mr. andriy, we will remind you about architecture, the communications director of the

ukrainian congress committee, the architecture of future global security, how much it can change after the end of the war after our victory, what to do with russia, what to do with the un, what to do with ukraine in the eu and nato, what to do with security and the collective european country, the atlantic and ukrainian security, i ask first of all when we talk about this enemy of ours and this country, which are i don't want to ask, but uh, as we saw in the close ones is it a good state these days? is it in libya or others? there is no possibility to create a country where the relatives do not want to create a country, then any future will be there. it must be discussed at the hospital level. what does this mean in terms of international agreements? this is another matter, but they must agree that they need a short cut, they need a better way, and

now we don't see it, we don't even see demonstrations at the level of the swamp, it's been more than 10 years ago, and this tells us what state the democrats are in now, there exist but uh, i'm so very oriental for friend volodymyr to think how did it happen after the second world war and we are preparing a conference in washington that is also historical and we are sitting down that after 75 years in the 48th year in a month there were olympics and neither germany nor japan was accepted not only for that olympiad while they were saying that you are being restored to a completely different state, the flag is a new

state gene, a new structure. it is important for this uh, we need a change, first of all, it is also very interesting how the 75th year will be, uh, in the 48th year, there was this march plan, well, to which country are we talking about russia or ukraine? i think it is more important for democracy and we will see what will happen to the north, and then there may be another option, because it will be the 75th anniversary of the marshalland, we built europe, but on the temporary 75th anniversary. we will see after this war, whether there will be there is a strong pressure on the ukrainian border and there, like in mordor, we will cooperate

there, there will be a portal, morda has given her crimes, you understand , for more than 70 years, we can repeat it, and the whole world has listened to it. well, they are repeating now, the historical conclusions will be made by the civilized world after this, including problems creation of the united nations , friend volodymyr wrote a very cool article when he was still a representative at the united nations, why does russia not have the right to sit on the security council, and now , now, friend serhiy kislytsia also made statements openly says the problem of the un so that it was created we say in america the problems of the constitution first that we have eh slavery the problems of the creation of the un from the very beginning that we included

a genocidal dictator as a co-founder of the co-founder of the un and he could control various rules whether it is a genocide convention or others so that we have not recognized for ten years, almost a century, it will be that we do not recognize all the criminal cases of russia that have existed for more than a century. i think that ukraine would be the best gift to the whole world not only confirmation of democracy in europe, but finally, that justice should come to the baltic countries , to the poles, to everyone against whom this enemy has been attacking for centuries. you mentioned germany. five five meters, for 4.5 years they were engaged in denazification of the local population. well, they just freed the brain from the one on the

nazi ideology that was there, that in those days there were still mayors, various local deputies there the elections were and no, i am saying that there were such leaders who did not participate in the nazi regime and could have been such leaders. such leaders do not exist in modern russia. volodymyr mentioned the statement of macron, who said that in russia it should also be offered some kind of security guarantees. really, why do we need security guarantees in ukraine, or russia, let's take care of security projects now, and first of all, miss kron, is he looking for someone for the future, is he, is he sitting with armenians and azerbaijanis, is he going to israel , does he want something for the future, does he want some kind of tattoo works well and works p macrons on his premium

well and besides that and what about the guarantees are most important to me when we all sat and watched the security council february 24 in america is controlled by the security council russia has full control yes and even then this enemy has a separate statement that he he launches rockets to the whole world. excuse me, the ficus with the poppy says i don't care about your agreements on guarantees, why does he not care about any agreement when we had such a war against ukraine for eight years. one thing came to your attention when our climatologists said look at what is happening in crimea, they want to transfer nuclear weapons again, well, we are also looking for an agreement on nuclear weapons, is there any punishment if cain crossed the border and there oda country declared that

it will not happen until eternity. there are none there is no world police it does not exist and this is the moment of the 24th of february i am looking only at this moment when the security council controlled but he also had his own separate statement he wanted to the world and he wants to show the world and that everyone your dreams your ideals this nothing, because there is no punishment, how do i want to do something? i have this medical control because i have nuclear weapons. and this is very unfortunate for the whole world . he is laughing, our enemy against this world, now it's just not only putin, it's

collective putin - there's a lot of putin, who supports it all over the world, how do americans treat them, first of all, after open war, open war, that we kept silent during the attack did not see this immortal regiment this year, as they had an active company for years already, they rested last year, a really big campaign woke up again against e when the events were uh-uh on the azov i was just with our friend the consul general qr-ku p oleksiy said we are going to the movie is like that freedom and fire, because it came from azovstal, orest and the cossack, and i’m sitting there watching. my soul doesn’t stay anymore, because that’s how we remember all the tragedies of the past months, and then they become two agitators