for our residents to have a life in the struggle for our residents to be able to evacuate in the struggle for us to at least somehow provide assistance to our residents who today have to leave the temporarily occupied territories and find themselves all over the world, these are new challenges and local self-government at the front to these challenges, fedorov , the mayor of metok, who was a prisoner of the occupiers, thank god, has returned. killed the russians during the occupation, this is kyiv region in particular , and this is also our price. it is the price of the nation that we are paying now for our freedom and independence. well, there is good news from our government. andriy kovalev, our expert is a military man, he himself is an expert on religion, a military historian and now an elder of our of the general staff from time to time he appears in our in

our reports so operative he wrote the following the cabinet fired the main defender of the russian orthodox church in ukraine elena bohdan about whom we talked literally the day before yesterday it seems because today, that is, the day before yesterday, the cabinet of ministers finally dismissed the head of the state service on the issue of mutual politics and freedom of conscience, who consistently defended the interests of the moscow patriarch in ukraine. and because olena bohdan consistently and purposefully defended the rpc in ukraine, she blocked the re-registration of communities that included came out of the spiritual captivity of the russian orthodox church and joined the orthodox church of ukraine. well, congratulations. we hope that this position will now be headed by a truly patriotic and professional person who will

protect the interests of the ukrainian national church. cross of ukraine, mr. pavlo, i congratulate you, i congratulate you, good morning, good afternoon, sir, i wanted to start the conversation with a private question, if i may, and it does not concern the red cross of ukraine, but it concerns the entire information plan against which we generally function and live. yesterday, late in the evening, an interview with the sensational serhiy nikiforov, press secretary of the ukrainian president, in which he talked about various things for interfax-ukraine, went viral around the world and said, among other things about the first days of the existence of the ukrainian government in the conditions of war after the invasion of the russians, saying that it was so difficult, so difficult that he did not live there for a week, but he lived for several months until the summer in the office of the presidential administration and that our president together with his entourage were starving so starving that they ate mivina, and well, i will make an advertisement, and you wrote and why am i contacting you, you wrote that you are laughing on facebook, and you have a good fee for advertising

- mivina, dude you wrote the character. let's say that a statesman will receive victims, of course, but i immediately had a logical question. pavel well, how come there wasn't even a light in the president's office, what nikiferov says that mivina was spoken to with warm water because there was no dill and she was half raw her ate and such were the terrible conditions, i immediately have a question well, how well, first of all, well, we have a channel on the channel. there is even a generator that ensures the functioning of the channel, a small private channel. and this is a regime object , the main regime object in the country, there was no light to boil boil boiling water and pour this mivina if they have already eaten it. is it not there what is there? your comments that there seems to be a whole grocery complex is located on the territory of the presidential administration. i steam it with dill and not with warm water, as the press secretary of the president wrote, please, well, i don’t think that this information should be taken seriously as

reliable, it still, from my point of view, has an absolutely classic look of pr of such a message about tears probably flowed from our fellow citizens of ukraine about how the government suffered, including the first days of the war, although of course i understand and i fully accept the fact that most of the employees of the president's office really lived in the president's office but there is nothing but laughter in the story about mivina, let's say so, because i actually live there in the center of kyiv. i know that the shops were open and you could buy food, and after all, the presidential administration, the president's office is well, not only the premises for banks, there is also a large special complex for the catering of the employees

of the president's office, which includes canteens and coffee shops, and there is a whole series of grocery stores there, three or four grocery stores are located right on the territory of the vice president, well i.e. there is no access there for ordinary citizens, but this is the kind of piskomplex that has remained since the time of the communist party of ukraine, because it is bankova, it is the former premises of a gypsy woman, and there and there such comments, you understand, they raise more and more questions in society. they tell us about that that the whole government and everything. they were preparing for war, but they didn't tell people about it so as not to create

panic, and here it turns out that the government was so prepared for war that even for the functioning of the highest body, today, the de facto power of the president's office in they didn't even have food for themselves, so you know , i'm saying this again, in my opinion, it's absolutely a pr interview in order to let's say that the ukrainians felt the entire tragedy of that situation, although, to be honest, i think that uh, let's say that who , but the office of the president in those days, it was provided better than uh well, of course, ukrainians, but our contributors report on social networks that now the company that produces mivina will make a new new line and call it, well, it will be called mivina presidential, and there you go again they will add a bag of oil, which was already taken away from previous reports, and i will also say that there is also a velor restaurant of mykola tyshchenko, which has been working with delivery all these

days . stood up for the defense of transcarpathia from er, that means from the armed attack of the russian federation, we remember this epic battle in transcarpathia and he, as far as i know, joined the defense of transcarpathia from the first hours. therefore, obviously, he could not be here in kyiv and could not to help the president's office, it's about what the red cross of ukraine is doing now. tell me, please, what are the main tasks before you , what can we talk about? we were really looking forward to inviting

volynivka to the occupied territories, in particular, but this is what your organization is dealing with, and now there are still some new challenges, well , yes, thank you for this clarification. indeed, the red cross of ukraine and the international committee of the red the cross is different organizations with different mandates , therefore our mission is to help ukrainians, we are a ukrainian organization, a ukrainian public organization, not a budget organization, not a state organization, a public public organization of ukraine, we will not receive budget funding, we receive all funding as e-e assistance as donor assistance from the red cross societies national societies, in particular, our active partner is germany, sweden, etc., norway, luxembourg, spain , that is, a national society plus we will receive funding unconditionally for relevant programs for

assistance from international associations of the red cross and we unconditionally from the organization of the organization of ukrainians from ukrainian business from the state, we will not receive budget funding, not a penny , that is, a loss from you, which ukrainians can count on and where to find them well, first of all we continue to engage in the main mission of providing humanitarian aid, and we have already distributed more than 40,000 tonnes of humanitarian aid to ukrainians over 10 million citizens of our country. received humanitarian aid from us. we continue to do this, first of all, forced migrants, people with disabilities and people who have little family

support . those people are sheltered by forced migrants. who rents out their housing to forced migrants for the winter. the amount of compensation for those people is today, well, 900 uah per family. and this also only the contribution of the red cross of ukraine to this program. these are what we pay, and certainly to this day . only with finances, not with payments, e.e. payments, rather, humanitarian aid issues, but we actively participate in the reconstruction and restoration

of infrastructure, in particular, only in the restoration of energy supply to kherson and the kherson region. we already spent more than 70 million hryvnias, this is the purchase of a power cable, this is the purchase of generators, this is the purchase of the necessary equipment for our power engineers. we are happy that every day kherson is getting electricity and, well, a separate microdistrict already today. as far as i know, up to 80% of kherson already has today electricity in that verb, including definitely and a place, we need the authorities and the red cross of ukraine, so these are the tasks before us today, well, definitely today, if you take the occupied territories, it is kharkiv oblast sumy oblast chernihiv oblast kherson oblast zaporizhzhia oblast

so there are colossal problems of a humanitarian nature and interruptions with food and drinking water with e-e medicines, etc. we are also trying to actively work in this regard. happened back in july of this summer, when more than 30 ukrainian servicemen were killed as a result of the explosion of either the barracks or the prison in which they were held. we talked when a special mission of the international red cross will arrive, the brazilian general was already determined, who was supposed to go there, this mission did not arrive, that is, everything stopped, what state is this story in now? do you know anything about this investigation of this crime? yes, i want to emphasize that the organization of the united nations formed a corresponding mission and it was supposed to

really come to the deer park, but as far as i know, the russian federation actually did not provide the opportunity for full-fledged work, the mission of the organization is united they are not alone. these are in the deer shed, and as of today, we have, that is, the mission. he is not allowed there, and it is obvious that we do not fully understand what happened to volyn, although we definitely today have testimony from those of our boys and girls who were in the deer shed who, well let's say from their own words what could have happened in the deer park, i can also say that, as far as i know, the mission of the international committee of the red cross, i say once again not to be confused with the red cross of ukraine, we are a different organization, but the places of the

international committee of the red cross that had she is still in donetsk today and at any moment she is ready to leave for eleniachka, but as of today , the international committee of the red cross has not received the relevant permits for her stay, and therefore there is no such thing as access to our prisoners of war, but i want to say that the international office of the red cross has access to our boys and girls who are prisoners of war in other places of detention, so i want to emphasize once again that i understand that it was for us that we are all focused on alenivka as a place tragedies where our boys and girls died. but, in fact, in russia and in the occupied territories of

ukraine, there are more than a few dozen such institutions where our prisoners of war are kept and to which the international committee of the red cross still has a certain limited access. therefore, it is necessary to speak to demand from international organizations from the un access not only to the deer hut, but to all prisoners of war who are on the territory of the russian federation or in the occupied parts of our country, well, the international red cross well that's how we talked about it. that's how it was presented by our government and the world public in general is the guarantor of the exchange of prisoners from azov, and i don't know if you've read the interview of oleksandr vlasenko, the spokesperson of the international red cross of ukraine , to ukrainian pravda . he gave sonya to lukash where he said that they well, how do you also confirm that they have such access to

certain ukrainian prisoners of war and such visits are well, semi-secret let's just say that no one talks about them, and for what purpose then they visit these prisoners of war if there is no continuation of these meetings from these visits. well, at the level of official statements or official actions of the red cross. well, oleksandr said in particular that we want to have access to 100% of those detained in connection with the conflict, well, by the way they also do n't publicly call the war a conflict of the international red cross. well, i don't know if such diplomacy is appropriate. well, that's their position, please. i want to emphasize that we, the red cross, do not call a war a war and we place all the correct accents because we are focused on activities in ukraine and we are another organization of the international committee of the red cross , and they by the way, i would advise everyone to carefully read the interview of the representatives of the

international committee of the red cross without emotion, and surely many will understand why they well, they are very often silent and do not advertise their trips or their activities in ukraine, in principle, because they believe that they really have access to hundreds of ukrainian prisoners and thousands that of more than a thousand who are currently in russian captivity, but they consider it already some kind of achievement if they talk a lot about these visits about er or condemn in some way or russia or call the war a war, this is an obstacle for them to even get to those hundreds prisoners of war to which they have access today, the main mission is what, well, let's say what they achieve when they get to the prisoners of war, definitely. the

first thing is a kind of pressure on russia from the point of view that russia should comply with the conditions of detention of prisoners of war, although this is not done but nevertheless, this is still such international pressure, the second is the search for prisoners of war because , unfortunately, russia does not provide complete information, full information, neither to the ukrainian side, nor to the international committee of the red cross, in general, no names of prisoners of war about where they are kept, not about the conditions for keeping them, that's why the international committee of the red cross is looking for people and, well, let's say at least it ensures communication with relatives so that relatives know that this a person is in captivity, that this person is alive and that there is some minimal contact with him, plus definitely they are trying to help where the

russian federation allows them to improve the conditions of keeping prisoners of war, and i know that accordingly they are providing help, so once again i want to say definitely we would all like that, well, let's say this, access to our prisoners of war was full, we knew, we understood that they were received in normal conditions, but it must be clearly understood that this does not depend on the international committee of the red the cross is exclusively from russia, and that is why we all have to put pressure on russia to comply with the geneva conventions, and if the geneva conventions are not complied with, our relevant bodies, first of all, the ministry of foreign affairs, have filed appropriate lawsuits against russia already today, regarding non-compliance with the geneva conventions of the statutory

organizations of the united nations for participating in the broadcast pavlo rozenko , vice president of the red cross society of ukraine, was with us germany intends to become the guarantor of european security, because it is precisely such a step from it allies are waiting for this, m.m. wrote offshore in his article, it is noted that schol is the chancellor of germany, he says that berlin is making every effort to strengthen the world order based on the principles of the united nations charter, he emphasized that germany's safety, well-being and democracy depend on compliance with general rules well, this is a claim on the world leader for the establishment of world order, but it is surprising that on the basis of the principle of the un charter, the organization that is now demonstrating its inability to solve new challenges because russia is a co-founder there and andresumland remains an analyst

of the stockholm center for eastern european studies joins addresses we welcome you to our broadcast good day greetings please explain how to treat the words of olaf scholz - what is the claim about what and why appeal to the principles of the un charter and where and not to possibly some new agreements? well, i think here it is about some new agreement, only it will be based on the principles of the un, as they are in principle good, these principles are only born and well, in general, this this is a positive signal from germany, because it used to be more restrained in international relations. and now there is such a slow step or movement, or this is the leadership role of

germany. well, at least in europe, how will it be later i didn't know yet, but it's more about a new agreement. well, being a guarantor of european security and world order is enough. well, such ambitious statements, how far can germany cope with them, and why exactly now are statements after such silence is enough for a long time, i think that this primarily concerns ukraine and that it is more about european security and about these countries that are members of the eu and nato, such as ukraine, moldova , georgia, and well, there must be some solution. here is the example of ukraine e- eh now illustrates and eh hmm well

now it already is eh well it seems to be announced that understands that here some new agreement must be made in order for these countries to receive at least some support for their security and how does this correlate with the situation with germany did not allow the poles to supply patriot systems place these petri on the territory warsaw is disappointed by the decision of berlin not to hand over the patriot complexes to ukraine, so poland moves to the stage of further placement of german missiles on its territory, the minister of national defense of poland, mariusz blaszczak, wrote about this on twitter , ukrinform reports, that is, on the one hand, germany claims some status as a guarantor of european security on the other hand, germany is afraid even to hand over air defense systems is not an offensive weapon,

it is a weapon that simply protects the sky over ukraine as this is correlated with these statements with such actions and positions, please. unfortunately, i still do not have any additional information on why such a decision is made, because, well, or surprisingly, because germany has already supplied ukraine with heavy anti-aircraft equipment, these institutions are cheetahs ayres missiles, that's why it's strange that now such a decision is different from anti-aircraft missiles. well, i don't either yet. i don't have an explanation for this. there may be another factor here. apparently, the american side has prohibited the supply of such weapons because it is american equipment and which is not yet in ukraine and well, i

suspect that probably not so much germany has such a position here. well, and our main ally of the united states, mr. andres, yesterday we spoke with ukrainian diplomats and with the representative of the ukrainian congressional committee and the spokesman, and we also talked about the fact that in general, is there a plan in the collective action or in the individual country of the united states of america regarding what to do with russia after the ukrainian victory, whether to read and within the current borders, whether to leave it with nuclear weapons or to exchange putin for another putin, whose name is patroshev to rychkin, or some other, well, some prigozhyn, yes, or to exchange in general for some other leader not from this putin team, and perhaps it is precisely with the lack of this plan that this is connected, no, no, no, the determination to provide weapons, that is we will exhaust russia, but let it exhaust itself for the time being so that we

can think about what to do with it next. or let it exhaust itself, let it simply not prevent us from entering a world dialogue there with china, for example. so there is a plan for a collective event to enter europe what should the united states do with russia and how should this war end? what should be the end of the whole war ? does anyone know the desired end? well, i think that there is no concrete plan regarding the internal development of russia, and even there er, the usa does not have any tools to have some er influence there, er, to change the leadership there, the direction of the foreign policy policy, there is no such thing here, but there may be some, well, a proposal from the side of the establishment for russia to fundamentally change its foreign policy

and then it can become a part of some kind of general european security system, but for this, a change of the regime there is already needed, well, it could not be imagined in any other way, that is, it is clear, ugh, there may be some actions to change the borders there or the internal situation of russia, well, there is no such thing, russia deals with internal affairs itself, but the goal of the war is the goal of the war for ukraine, for ukrainian society, for the citizens is to liberate their territories donetsk luhansk crimea sevastopol simferopol in of a collective event, the similar goal of this fi- the finale of this war is exactly what the european union , the united states, g7 countries or

not are striving for. before, it was a slightly different situation because there it was considered that what should happen with crimea - it is really some kind of abivalent situation there or with donbas there may be some of these minsk agreements that can be implemented there, but now that's all gone. there are no such agreements there. - there are some separate ones in the case of crimea, because now other territories are also annexed, that is, now i think that the majority of politicians in the west understand that well, only the main thing, well, the full ukrainian territorial e-e, complete whole, so much can be e-e war address

regarding the position inside germany, or simply the germans has the vision of what is happening in ukraine transformed in the russian-ukrainian war in 10 months of almost full-scale invasion? well, it has changed, and here is this resolution of the german parliament regarding the holodomor illustrates, rather, now, the problem is not that they somehow have contempt for russia or understanding of the misunderstanding of ukraine, but rather that people are simply afraid that it will not turn into the third world war, that there will be no nuclear war people are simply afraid that it will not directly concern germany, and that is why now there is such a devaluing

position in germany, and how does the government reflect this, and that is what people are afraid of, and that's why, well , the help is not going as much as we wanted would thank you to you stockholm address of the center for eastern european studies, let's move on. it's almost ten o'clock on the clock. hanna eva melnyk is already preparing to tell us about everything that is happening in ukraine and the world. news next anna eva good morning good morning colleagues well, 10:00 is the time when the general staff announces the losses of the enemy, so how many more russians will go today