the one that will finally end this regime. thank you pavlo klimkin, diploma, and the dutch minicuratorium will not demand from russia the extradition of persons found guilty by the court of the death of flight mh17 in the sky in donbas, which was shot down from a russian beech tree, why do they know? my colleagues, the broadcast continues. congratulations, this is the freedom of life my name is vlad and lazur . over the past day, as a result of russian armed aggression in ukraine, 11 civilians were killed, nine in the donetsk region, two people in the kherson region, and 17 more people were injured from referring to the data of the regional administrations, this was reported by the deputy head of the office of the president kyrylo tymoshenko in the city of kurakhove, donetsk region

. local authorities today closed bazaars, shops , and post offices. this decision was made due to the consequences of yesterday's attack on the city. now you can see these consequences on the video. russian forces shelled the central part of the city under volodymyr zelenskyi bakhmutskyi and the avdiiv direction is donetsk for many days already mentioned in front-line reports as the hottest points of the eastern front thanks to the transfer of troops from kherson russian forces managed to advance a little in donbas in the american institute for the study of war previously reported about russia's plans to surround the city although as military experts claim, in particular, in our on the air, this thesis was repeatedly sounded, the capture of bakhmut would have limited operational value for russia, first of all , it would be a political victory for the ukrainian forces they are defending bakhmut, look, it is passing intensively, there is

enough ammunition, we are doing everything possible, the number of departures is always different, from three to five, it can be 10, depending on the activity of the enemy and the need to carry out fire missions,

the fact that the direction has recently become more active, the enemy is conducting offensive actions , aviation has also become more active their aerial reconnaissance is constantly conducted yesterday all day airstrikes were carried out their unmanned aerial vehicles were flying

steve in the administration of us president joe biden they think over the supply of cluster munitions to ukraine, this is written without reference to its sources , in recent months the ukrainian side has called on the biden administration and members of congress to provide ukraine with cluster warheads, this weapon is banned in more than a hundred countries of the world, but russia continues to use it, causing great losses to ukraine, stating the request to provide cluster munitions to ukraine ammunition,

as american ukrainian officials told journalists, is one of the most controversial requests that ukrainians have addressed to in the united states since february, as it became known, high-ranking officials of the biden administration have been considering this request for several months and have not yet rejected it completely. well, in the meantime, according to financial time, with reference to an adviser to the government of ukraine on defense issues, who wishes to remain anonymous, he would inform the former that ukrainian drones that attacked military airfields in the british and saratov regions of russia are a joint development of state structures and private business, the interlocutor of the publication emphasized that a private company that he

did not name. business, as a result of this work, such drones were made. countries before, only uh, russia made such blows, you hit the ukrainian rear, now it turns out that ukraine can also do it, uh, everything depends directly on the number of such possibilities . of the armed forces of ukraine, but as far as i know, there is no official confirmation either from the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine, or from the ministry of defense of ukraine, or from both, from any official who has the authority to make such statements that some incident on the territory of the russian federation

at its airfields, it was the effect of the action of someone there by the ukrainian armed forces. and that is, we cannot say today that this is exactly the action of ukraine, and because they write there, uh, some countries. they said about reports about cluster munitions. well, it also bothers me a little. it’s a kind of dissonance. why? because cluster munitions are prohibited and ukraine does not use prohibited types of weapons. unlike the russian federation, we cannot to make this request at least for this position, but another position we cannot make this request at least because we receive enough high-precision weapons in order to hit the objects of the russian invaders with high precision, what are cluster

munitions used for, they are used when the russians do not have high-precision weapons it is not there, it was not there in the soviet union, that is why they bet exclusively on cluster munitions in ukraine, this is not necessary, we have high-precision weapons, so i will clarify. that is, you are inclined to think that cnn is writing a lie that it is unlikely that ukraine could have asked for cluster munitions. and who asked for it? i want to hear the last name, well , it's not the last name, of course, the last name is not reported. so that's the point of this case when the emphasis is placed on the fact that this is some source, some other, but this source is called, but we must to believe this i don't believe it anymore i've been with information that has no personalization since 2014 i don't believe i only want here i only want to remind here we definitely question this information and

talk about it with experts i just want to remind that the absolute majority of ukrainian journalists and ukrainian society that russia is preparing a full-scale invasion and that there will be an attack and that they are going to attack from many directions at the same time were just reported by german american publications with reference to anonymous sources. this is just to understand that sometimes the media that write with reference to anonymous sources can write the truth because the stream for one reason or another is not called betty sources. well, when near the border with ukraine more than 180,000 personnel were collected it is somehow difficult not to write an article based on some anonymous sources that talk about the invasion itself, it was clear back in october 2012, we did not talk about it now, we talked a lot about cluster munitions

. you , as an expert, have a guess as to what kind of weapon it was. even in this studio, there were various speculations that it was some kind of modernized er drone made by ukroboronprom or that it was a modernized soviet drone. what is your opinion, first of all it is 100% non-missile weapon it is 100%. and if we talk about the capabilities of our military-industrial complex, it is very interesting that the military-industrial complex of ukraine has always been ahead of the capabilities of the russian military-industrial complex. and the russians invaded our territory in a hybrid way. and we did not receive enough

technologies from our western partners to implement a large number of, well, let's say so, effective projects that could help us in the fight against the occupiers. and now from 2022, after a full-scale invasion, we already have uh, these technologies directly provide us with them, and i do not exclude the fact that they contributed to the development of some directions and uavs, because i will remind you that before in 2014, uavs were not a promising direction of our military-industrial complex after 2014. volunteers also separately and so on. they took a really realistic, really quite serious step in the development of these technologies, and now we see this result is using a large number of uavs of ukrainian production, but we could also

use other hands, for example, the development of attack uavs, kamikaze drones and others, and therefore i do not rule out that we have the opportunity today to produce such some objects that have a rather serious distance, the effective distance of the use of a combat unit, and also a control system that allows you to effectively control this object outside the borders of ukraine, as well as in the zone of dense rap, as well as the taser radar, that is air defense is the enemy, how many objects are actually in the russian rear that could potentially become the target of the ukrainian army or some incomprehensible drones, as here, too, and so they expressed themselves, well, in a word, those objects that only

help russia launch attacks on the territory of ukraine unfortunately, unfortunately, there are a large number of them, and this is not only the airfield, this is not only some uh-uh military units or a-ah or this some kind of warehouses, and these objects include warehouses with fuel and lubricant materials. and these are, well, warehouses with ammunition, we understand, but this repair base a this and air defense bases are command posts, control points, headquarters , and so on . the russian military infrastructure has a lot of work to do, but it is necessary to concentrate as much as possible this kind of influence on the territory of the

russian federation, because in my opinion, after all, only after it can we force the russian russian military-political the regime should go to negotiations regarding the recognition of its capitulation, and not how else do you think that if such attacks will happen more often, it will change the course of the war so radically that russia will talk about some conditions of surrender for itself, yes, and why not , because - and there were some incidents a at airfields on the territory of russia, let's just analyze that it happened a-a more than 700 km from the border with ukraine in the airspace, yes, a strategic object, and strategic planes were destroyed, and bomber planes of a strategic purpose missile carriers from the nuclear triad complex. and this

object was supposed to be protected by air defense complexes like no other, but something happened there, it was not just the destruction of planes, it was 95 mms and also 122m3, which russia cannot produce today, it does not have the production of these of planes, it cannot compensate for these losses, moreover, it is a reputational disgrace, so important was destroyed at such an important object, the planes with which it frightens the whole world are so important for russia. analogues in the world, where are the s400, where are the thor m2 and m3, where are the rgk pancyres-1, where is this whole system that it sold and exported to other countries, many countries bought these anti-aircraft missile systems, but

the most important thing is that other countries saw this nemish russian air defense system which russia considers to be its historically geopolitical enemies well, for example, the united states, the united states saw that the russian air defense system, well, it is some kind of woodblock print oleksandr kovalenko, a military analyst of the information resistance group, was on radio liberty, thank you liberty life is broadcast on the espresso tv channel also on the pages of radio svoboda on facebook and on youtube. if you watch us on the internet, please like and support our work . he says that this is a political order. let's analyze this story in detail. the ambassador of the european union will discuss the ninth package of sanctions against

russia already tonight. what restrictions will he include in them? who opposes the sanctions? the authoritative american publication politico recognized vladimir putin as the loser of the year, and putin himself is preparing his population for a protracted and exhausting war and calls the captured ukrainian territories a significant result , what does this mean? aimed at the conquest of additional territories, this is stated in the current review of the american institute for the study of war, analysts recalled that during a meeting with the council at the president of russia on the development of civil society and human rights. yes, there is such a council, although human rights are not similar, so then he noted that the war in ukraine can be, quote, a long process , and the capture of new territory is a significant result

for russia. experts note that putin favorably compared himself to the russian tsar after peter the first emphasized that russia now controls the sea of ​​azov, for which the king allegedly fought, well, by the way, returning to this very meeting with the so-called representatives of civil society, so before the meeting in the kremlin, they gave an instruction not to upset the president, it is not necessary to ask him about the losses of the russian armed forces, citing their sources, the russian edition of verstok said that the question of the application of the law on fakes to the russian army about the execution of wagnerian viktor nuzhin was also included in the list of prohibited items and about the protests of the mothers of the mobilized well and the statements well and the statements of putin in particular regarding the war against ukraine which were finally heard at this meeting and collected by serhiy stetsenko, listen as in for several months, the rhetoric of the russian president has been changing, one of the first questions put to putin at a meeting with the human affairs council is the

results of the war against ukraine, and the answer about, in particular, the goals, the next one has changed because new territories appeared. the result is still significant for russia, this is a serious question. this is how putin explained the attack on ukraine on february 24, on the day of the full-scale militarization and densification of ukraine. ukrainian territories, we are not going to impose forces on anyone and nothing. and this is what putin said almost three months after the full-scale attack . the next mobilization in russia, according to him, only a quarter of the three hundred

thousand conscripts are in combat units there is no meaning and necessity for the state and for the ministry of defense in this today . i am waiting for nuclear weapons, which were constantly threatened during the invasion of the kremlin. now putin says that he considers it as a means of defense. we will report on this. we have nuclear weapons for this purpose, and they are in a more advanced and more modern form than those of any other nuclear party. run around the world a few months ago during the announcement of the mobilization in russia unequivocally for the money of the world three in georgia territorial

integrity of our country for the protection of russia of our people we will definitely use all the resources at our disposal this is not a bluff after this statement, the so-called referendum on occupied territories of ukraine and their accession to russia and the withdrawal of russian troops from the ukrainian kherson serhii stetsenko radius so, despite putin's previous statements that the russians have the goal of occupying ukrainian territories after 10 months of full-scale war, he calls the capture of ukrainian territories a significant result oleksandr morozov joins the air, a political science researcher at the boris nimtsov center for russian studies at charles university in prague. to declare their aggressive goals , does such rhetoric find a response in the hearts of the elites

or the people? how do you think? it seems to me you know that eh, to history, this shows how it seems that eh, the russian population does not understand very clearly at all where is the annexation of russia, eh, so as a result, this is the solution that has already been implemented, because from the point of view of the kremlin, it is obvious that the territorial seizure has already taken place because, well, it happened again in september, as far as the rhetoric itself is concerned. a wonderful story. here we listened now. as for the rhetoric, you know, first of all, putin speaks different things for different audiences , and secondly, it is well known. already eh well, probably experts of political rhetoric did not consider already about 10-12 different a-and explained why the kremlin is waging this war and eh, it all started there at first with

the fact that eh, this is not a war against the ukrainian race . on the verge of removing some neo-nazi government in kiev, then he uh, some concept was put forward that this war is going on against the fact that anti-russia was formed. such a person was there uh , and so on, and so on, well now , actually speaking, eh i meet that she just s- by the council on human rights, of course, it is already in quotation marks, only you can use it to dig into a person in this context with this council, he said with such a dry mouth that, well, there is no result of the war. этом конечное е- е реальный смыслы вый е -е he speaks constantly, he kept the secondary form, this is known, this is the capitulation of kyiv, and at every moment when the kremlin is seriously questioned on some international arena, he is always there.

diplomats always answer the same thing: kiev must fulfill our conditions, that is, surrender. and you think that the kremlin still believes that this is a condition that can be fulfilled on the part of kiev. he doesn't believe it anymore because, well, the reason is understandable, because there is very large-scale support for ukraine, that's why kremy now likes to say from time to time that he is not at war with ukraine. i think there are many they no longer believe that in this war there will be any reasonable way out, but nevertheless they cannot get out of this war, so all that remains is to invent or in any case utter some completely new new formulas that supposedly justify this war to meet you human rights defenders, putin said that in quotation marks, a special operation in ukraine can

be a long process. and how long do you think the war will last? he is still preparing his people. certain the result of the war itself, well, since the kremlin has lived everything inside the war, and we can see clearly that the government and the central bank are adapting to it . all russia needs a war, uh, you can say with certainty only one thing that the mobilization that putin ruled, but it is clearly correct in order to support the war, in any case, he is sleeping there in the 23rd year, i don’t doubt it, and there is no evidence to the contrary that i understand i would like to end the war, i am ready for war, you know. the point is that when people pursue such a suicidal policy, they

say that you do not have enough resources. - something similar is based on such suicidal rhetoric, this is roughly putin going in this direction. well, i think that when resources become available, it means not less and everything will be more complicated. built-in rows so sit in the trenches and so on, i understood the process is endless, here in letters the american publication politika called vladimir zelensky the person of the year, er, the influential person of europe, to be exact, in 2022. writes politics

is vladimir putin's dream of a great russia. the third-level incompetent will defeat an opponent whom she underestimated and cherished. and what do you think, uh, the political elites in the kremlin also consider putin a failure. that's how the american edition said today. yes, i think that quite a lot of people see perfectly well what uh , they're talking about there. a gross mistake, in any case . россии i had eh and well, yes, that’s the way it is, i think that here the authors completely ruled the kremlin in the last 20 years. it was catastrophic, as if it had split up in front of the whole world, and showed its weakness and, uh, the

lack of real military capabilities, which collapsed very large once eh but when all this did not start eh the kremlin no doubt looks rather pitiful in this war in all respects eh lamentable and at the same time well criminal in full because um the war is accompanied by no visible numbers no eh actions there, for example, the destruction of civil infrastructure, which the whole world can see, or there, for example, the mobilization of criminals, for example, and so on. всё новые новые предподъемные преступление всё ето всё окности конфеной история колосальным пролом eh so that eh putin is definitely the loser of the year well, i think that he will be the loser of the 23rd year there is nothing to do about it eh

history is definitely going to the point that this whole adventure with the attack on ukraine ended in the most unsightly way for the kremlin and for the russian federation as a whole. it will take longer, but not putin's ability to realize his dream does not mean that he will no longer be a nightmare for his neighbors, this is the explanation, so i have a question for you. what should be done so that russia does not become a nightmare in the future? for the neighbors, and this is what can be done now or immediately after the end of the war. the end in general is not a box. i am a concrete outcome. well, the secret form of the defeat of the kremlin is not in doubt, but the format

of this is not until the end. well, that’s why it’s worth it now . what can be done for it, but after the end of the war, i know that many people associate hope with the fact that russia just enter and wars it is so self -exuding that it will begin to disintegrate into parts eh, this is one of the possible scenarios eh, but not eh . of nuclear weapons, if russia does not disintegrate, and if its borders are preserved, the most important thing is that it is possible and necessary to do it, and it will have to be implemented together, and finally, from the topic in russia, who will be in power to implement the program and the deep geometrization of russia and the development of very large guarantees eh generally refused such eh future speech policy