shot by the german army, and the head of this rebellion was a real german aristocrat, our shield is one of them, more of such powerful german aristocratic families of roys, they were on chetweys, they were sovereigns of the state in prison until the 18th year, their state was part of empire, now this family is very numerous , this is royce henry the 13th flight. he is not the head of this family, he is one of those outsiders, but still he is a real royce. and here is his partner, as the police said, she is some woman who was from russia in as far as i understand her german citizenship, but she was born and grew up in russia, so here, uh, some uh, in italy, vitalya b, and it is alleged that she even tried to organize contacts and organized contacts of this heinrich, this future kaiser, that

is, as they wanted with the russian -e consulate and with representatives of russia. here is the question of whether they could really seize power, of course not. and whether they could arrange uh-uh, that means uh- huh shooting and the murder of ministers, parliamentarians, etc., of course, and we remember that murder of parliamentarians, let's say, it was in armenia in 1990 , in the ninth year, if i'm not mistaken. before 1997, when representatives of the government were killed in the parliament building, the entire top of the reformation armenian government was killed there, as is also believed on the order of the russian special services , to ask you about this, have you read this interview, angels merkel's website, you are not surprised that england does not admit its mistakes in principle. and you know the first

interview in which she did not admit. therefore, after this interview surprised because others and interview they were also about the fact that she did everything supposedly right and it's just that the world is wrong and she did everything right in general of course surprised surprised precisely because merkel is a scientist and she is a scientist of this practically she is a chemical physicist and in principle e- well, i, as a person, what if i also wrote a dissertation there and did a little bit of science, i always believed that the basic ability to be a scientist or a scientist is to ask oneself a critical question and admit one's mistakes, and this is how merkel that she also defended her dissertation, and this one is absolutely normal. how do people say that such a good dissertation is normal? it's very, very powerful. it means something, by some kind of alloy. i don't know

about it. it's too difficult for me. how can she not set herself such a thing ? the question is not clear and hmm i talked to many people about this and they all share the same disappointment and say well she looked so uh calm so uh how uh balanced so not uh not immersed in any emotions and here we see that this axis is image he was kind of like that, you know, that kind of fake, that kind of mask. and what was actually completely unclear. that is, she looks like she looked much more serious and smarter than who she is. this, of course, is one of the biggest disappointments of mr. sergiu. more about merkel, just clarifying questions. or maybe, as they say in russia, the box just opened, maybe

she is internal, so how to say, these are yes, that is, eastern, where she is a russian-flavored ruffian, she simply cannot imagine that russia is good, even at the head with such a mediocrity between good and bad putin , what did he look like in front of her? well, she couldn’t attack ukraine, she couldn’t. she, this russia, completely disregards european norms of civilized behavior and she just really said , come on, there won’t be a war, why are you all nervous here? will putin attack zelenskyi or ukraine? well, she can be sincere, that's the question. i don't think that it has anything to do with men from the gdr. well, because schrüder, he's not from germany, he's a west german. scholz is also a westerner. macron is also a westerner .

kneizel, the minister of foreign affairs of austria, you went to work for plants, you, she is not a zndr, or there is the minister of macro, the minister of france, fillon, who moved to work in russia. he, too , is not with communist germany, right. that is, i do not know to what extent is there in merkel, this ederian past a-a played their role er-er it is not clear er-it is obvious that she completely er-er neglected the interests of the neighboring countries of poland , ukraine and others and had such a er-er well no look at them er-er there was a place where only you know such people her behavior is such red flags, well, let's say she once put a portrait of catherine the second of the russian empress on her table, considering her to be such a role model, meaning a strong, powerful woman who

ruled russia, completely ignoring the role of catherine the second in the final establishment of the most rigid and immoral system of serfdom in the russian empire when people were simply deprived of everything when the life of serfs and serfs was probably even worse than how is the life of slaves there in i don't know in the southern states oh yes, she put it on her table, it is not clear that there was ignorance, lack of empathy or the ability to some such you know to some such megalomania in me, that is, i can frankly say for the first time in merkel years i liked her very much, mainly because of the contract as a schuriloder, schrüder obviously led a more luxurious life

than a german politician could afford, and because of that he went to gazprom, that is, he loved the luxury there, cigars, you’re on everything and merkel is underlined she refused it there for 10 years in a row , she went to the same resort, the same courses, the same sneakers, that is, she was absolutely like that, no, no, she did not return the money there, and it seemed very, very yes, in a human way, very hmm hmm yes, you know calmly, but it seems that she had other h-points on which you could fart and probably they were some kind of emanations, well, there are no, you know, fantasies about the fact that she is so extraordinary, absolutely great a unique woman who means that she can be at the same level as empress i it seems that there really was something in this, mr. serhiu, one more question, this is famous. well, now

they are talking about it at one time or another, they mentioned this guarantee of the security of the russian federation . the west of europe, what does this mean? what do they mean by the security guarantees of the russian federation? it seems that the russian federation has not been threatened by anyone until recently, but the russian federation was threatened . said more radically than macron yes what happened to all these security guarantees, where did they come from and what is meant by this is the main thing well, to be honest, when i hear about security guarantees for russia, i did not understand what it was about. that is, for me, it is like talking about security guarantees for the nazis, er, against the jews,

that the jews allegedly threaten them, well, let's talk in the 43rd year about the fact that it is necessary to negotiate with hitler, and er, this means forcing the jews to provide security guarantees for this state, well , no one threatened russia when russia spoke about security guarantees, it is obvious that this was assimism in order for west a to refuse any support from its neighbors and russia so that west recognized russia's full political sovereignty over all countries and allowed russia to do whatever it wanted in these countries this is not about the fact that no one should attack russia, because no one planned to attack russia and never attacked russia there, after the collapse of the ussr, no one attacked russia. russia attacked russia . it means moldova to georgia to ukraine

in fact, it bought belarus constantly threatens the baltic countries, which means it sent troops to kazakhstan and and and and that is, guarantees of the security of russia - that is, well, if a western politician does not talk about it , he knew that or they do not understand absolutely what it is about and they simply are not able to perform their er duties on the international arena or they are simply er playing on putin's side because they use his lying terminology and actually shift the discussion from a constructive constructive plane to real threats and real problems into the plane of fantasy in which since we are starting to use the kremlin in the accumulator, we cannot achieve any normal result in this discussion space

. you just uh, there is no system in which you work. oh, the security guarantee is uh, strongly russian, uh, it's the same as the neutrality of ukraine, the neutrality of ukraine has never been for the russians switzerland is a non-priority issue. and this was always the idea that ukraine had a principle of actually cheering ukraine in front of russia, that ukraine's neutrality was actually the neutrality of the west, which refused to support ukraine in the event of a threat. on the part of russia, the neutrality of ukraine was the idea of ​​giving ukraine over completely to the use of russia and not losing russia , there is another question or a group of questions, there is simply not so

much time, and this forum of free peoples, according to the line that opens in sweden, has it opened and you are there participate, as far as we know, please tell me if this is something serious, maybe it’s not a good question, but if i don’t see any reason to look at it so seriously, because it’s really good, wonderful people, maybe they were great politicians in europe well, there is no russian totalitarianism, but at the moment it does not look like something that can really end in the disintegration of russia, what do you say, you know, first of all, i was surprised to read on the twitter account of the supporters of aleksey navalny, what do i take participation in this form of sweden eh i was working i did n't hear anything about sweden and eh all the other people there, which

means they are supporters of oleksii navalny, they mean they once read there at the beginning of the lesson, which means i have criticism for sure. did they start eh writing about what a terrible person he is, it means how i want to destroy russia there from a nuclear strike on russia, it means to other things, but in this swedish forum i have not heard anything about him, i did not participate ukraine participates indeed, i was a few months ago at this forum of free nations of russia in prague prague is not in sweden, it is in the czech republic, and i was making a reference there about how the potential disintegration of russia looks or will look from the point of view of the german political establishment, because they wanted to hear whose ideas there are supported by the germans, frankly said that from the point of view of the germans, they would not have any support because, without germany's point of view, russia must be preserved, just as the west wanted the preservation of the soviet union

. ago that ukraine really has the competence in this, and germany will not do anything, so what about your question , whether russia is disintegrating or not? that all the wars in which people took part were led by her because she remained too large and tried to do it. it was not the phantom of the pain and she tried to restore the soviet union. she was too strong for that . she had nuclear weapons and she was constantly small. this opportunity to do it without impunity, but if russia falls apart, then the neighbors will live peacefully and the russians too, because the russians will not have uh. so there are prospects of dying by tens of thousands in

ukraine, there in syria, go there to die in central africa. they will not be there to finance putin's palaces or a stable there or someone else, that is, they have a chance to finally live normally. the same way how do ukrainians live normally, how do estonians live there, how do people live there? i don't know armenia there, they don't start world wars there, that's why i think that i i believe that the disintegration of russia is a real prospect because russia has nothing to hold except the moscow center and moscow power. as soon as moscow power ends, and it ends objectively in ukraine, then the tatars and bashkirs will sooner or later not be these peoples, but theirs the elites too, just like the ussr also collapsed, including out of desire, the elites will decide that it is easier for them to live independently because, well, look who nazarbayev was

in the 90s, the first secretary of the communist party of kazakhstan, gorbachev was actually his leader a year after that, we were already president, and gorbachev gave lectures at universities for 20 years after that, he still calls president gorbachev his son is going to contribute, that is, in the same way, the head of tatarstan or bashtistan will have a clear prospect of retaining the position of an independent president and to be there in the organization of the united nations to speak and then everything will disappear and to survive this collapse of the regime, that's why i think it will be good for everyone , why are the russians afraid well, i just don't understand themselves without an empire, if they understood that their life will be much better without the empire , they agreed to it simply based on a banal calculation. hmm, they are simpler. sergei, a conscientious german political scientist, explained to us that russia could fall apart. and

now we will not talk about russia anymore. we will talk about russia again. artis public is on the air, hello, well, here we were just talking about how what are the disintegration problems in the russian federation, new values, tell us that this is not as simple as the collapse of the soviet union, as we it was told here, sergey sumlin, that we were witnesses to this process and that your country had to go through this real struggle of the people . there is no desire. elites. as it seems to me, when a country wants to be independent, your side always wanted to be independent and achieved this as soon as the opportunity arose. and who i didn't want to. that one, and it's now, when it's possible, it's possible in other situations, it's like that. well, you know, we wanted to talk about it. who first declared that this should be stopped vlad and there was always a russian-

language press in the pre-precious in the years of the first republic and by the way when in soviet times the most free russian press was in latvia well, what is he saying? well, in estonia , your russian newspapers were published throughout the soviet union . that they were part of the latvian media culture, they are soviet and not russian, and somehow the channel rain was not written in this tradition. that's why it's an easy question, something because it's so much already what you said, it's correct because in latvian bella yes, it's a tradition, ah, mmm, media and cultural autonomy, too, in the 20s and 30s, it's a day of uritism, but it's a rain account. i think that here , of course, there are two sides. a-a

let's say that's how they attracted oppositionists and dissidents from russia with their freedom and the same policy, and i must say that the first dissident and generally those who came to us were not fugitives. these were old believers already in the 17th and 16th centuries if i remember well, yes, because of the rain, a-a, i think that a-a on the one hand, they still did a good job in our country because they were oppressive, uh, all propaganda and terrible propaganda, which is happening in russia now, but on the other hand, i think rain, uh, or i will say something like that participants of the rain, in my opinion, they did not understand that

they are in latvia, that they are in the european union, and that they are not recognized by russian media, but they are not latvian and european media now, and finally, this is the question under deeper in general for example, the media eh mmm let's say this always a-a reveal all sides that are here participants because well, if, for example, the russian military attacks eh on latvia, for example yes, but our journalists will not run eh to latvian soldiers and then to er russian soldiers and they ask how they don't feel this one thing and the other. i think in their own language.

i freed such a claim. it was byly these statements to the effect that these are our soldiers, that is, russian soldiers, uh, they are freezing there, they are dying there, and so on, but these are not our soldiers, they are not russian media there, yes. and if they say that there is a pity for russian soldiers who die in ukraine, then in principle they go against our state, too , only because we still believe that any soldier who entered the free land of ukraine, ukraine, he is an occupier and is humiliated by the attacking party. what, for example, is russian medicine, russian journalists, russian society, when she spoke about the second world war, she said, “oh, how

sorry i am for the fascists who are standing next to us here, we don’t hear anything like that even today. it showed that they do not fully understand, uh , everything is such a very important position during the war, but here, of course, is the old side, where i will be a little critical. europe uh, there was such a uh, russian-language media that uh, could announce the truth about what is happening now in this war and to russian residents, and that’s for sure, but let’s say that many of the people above who spoke about the rain were also money, so here the party is definitely one hundred percent black ryabeya, look at

this story, it seems to me that it is very important about this story with rain. i will say for ukraine, for me, it can be for some people around me, this question is the end of the discussion about good and bad russians, that is, we understood that among good russians, there can be good russians for russians, but they are not very good for ukrainians, latvians, and the sun is in lithuanians poles , finns, and so on, so that they speak there in the baltics, this is very important to us, and the question is because, of course, in soviet times, during the occupation, many russians came here who simply wanted to live well here and wanted to set up a with their own language and their own culture, in principle, they came here as if they were at home, and we were, in

principle, menuritets here, and it certainly hurt us a lot. of many russian-speaking people, if so, i can speak at all, yes, we have a-a, this is the time of such people, i apologize for the word hangover, because they still have to decide now, or are they humane peace with democracy with latvia and ukraine or they with putin and empires if they are with putin's empire, we have nothing to do here. there is zero tolerance. as we said , there is no middle ground here . let's say that the middle position is more. i would like to ask how many of you are such a devil. some excessive reaction to this

russian i don't know ilibiralnye publicnosti. you know, i'll tell you in quotation marks. i think i remembered youth because i remember well there in the 80-90s. i did an internship at a newspaper in jurmala, among other things. you are the editor-in-chief of ayvard balman from the future the representative of the latvian republic, prion, he asked me to look after the second trainees from the moscow university, because a cabaret or casino opened in yurmala somewhere in the pump, remember that it was something like the first such institution in the soviet union, he believed that the girls came from something like this cockroaches so he shot to moscow, i can't somehow behave incorrectly in this european institution, and they just perceived the class as a province, and i told them that if it's a province, then you have it in there is no such thing in moscow like this. this is such a conflict of civilization. i am watching it again. i thought that it was all over. no, it was not over. coburg was the place,

absolutely yes. it was the 91st year of russian citizens. when we won our freedom, and now i think second and finally, but here in latvia, in estonia, in lithuania, in poland, i have to say, too, in finland and even in sweden. i think that we we are not ready to make any more concessions. we are for democracy liberalism, we are for human rights. but this can never be done at the expense of our fundamental interests and our state , our freedom, our independence, that is, even here, just when such critical times as now , when the empire attacks ukraine, then people still have to choose what country do they live in, and

it's not like i know anything, i don't know anything. putin is the only one to blame here. but i'm a good person. the society is responsible for its elite, and how do we say in a democracy, well, everyone is like that. the government he chooses, and when we talk about his minister, there is an open investigation because the journalist said that it was necessary to help the russians somehow, so that it would be warm, and at the same time, the parliament the latvian says that in general this state is a terrorist, there is some contradiction here and the question arises whether the investigation is ongoing and indeed whether it is true that the authorities of latvia suspect some journalists of the rain in direct aid to the russian troops. i do not

i think there is direct help here, but uh, we live, uh, let's say it like this, uh, in russian , after all, in the country of the law, and yesterday, in my opinion, yesterday we also had a big discussion on television, where the rain representative also participated and the horses, of course they can file a lawsuit against this decision to close the license and we separate the closure with the license and uh that's why rain workers can still live on the territory of latvia, that is two different things, especially if if they go to court, we will explain, maybe the court will find it too that here, after all, in some world, it is possible to return the license, but i also have to say that i personally and i am certainly entering into such a situation here. i personally certainly cannot

answer for every employee, or there is no person who came here after the war. does he have more sympathy or less, or does he cooperate with something, he does not hesitate, for that we have a specific body and authorities that must deal with these people if someone falls on someone. let's say so, if there is a reason for it what do you think? what does he do? let's say that about russia, then of course we will talk to him differently. well, if there is a question, please, about what is happening, uh , the defense ministers of nato and european union countries always used to say that when communicating with their colleagues baltic countries poland is more radical in relation to russia and believes that ukraine's support should be more sensitive as the situation

looks like now. i apologize a little bit, i mean, i didn't say, i wouldn't have said that we are taking a radical position here, i said that, as the western press says - these were direct quotes from where you want and from the sites, false shaltimes, and i will find you a million proofs of what they are that's what they say yes, of course, but uh, i think that uh , that's what i'm saying. macron too i recently said that they simply think that there is also a division.