very carefully, but one way or another. when we hear the megathet's comments, they are generally based on international law and common sense, and they also boil down to theses anti-militarization, we will not comment on the course now, but the ending of this story should be that's how the deputy minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation, mr. lyapkov, seems to be. he said that the withdrawal of russian troops from the territory of the station means the seizure of the station by ukrainian troops, and that no one will force russia to do this. so the question arises, how can the russians to leave and stay at the same time. yes, this is a really difficult question. what are the many other questions that russian propagandists or some so-called warlord , nightingale and steppe warlord, have to answer from time to time in retrospect? we remember the thesis that russia is forever in kherson. we remember about similar

theses of such an area, because then they will explain to themselves, to their obliged population , the move away from the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. i think it is their problem, even less of us, when i am interested in what they say that they will never leave well, it’s the same, let’s mention the situation in kherson with many other populated areas already de-occupied, the practice of regrouping, the practice of waste, and the practice of fleeing among the rashists already after february 24. it is quite wide and active. there is every reason to believe that it will continue. you look optimistically at the situation around bakhmut. and whether or not to look at it in the sense that i am again trying to be careful in the sense that

indeed, on the one hand, russia already has several months, as if for six months, he is trying to capture bakhmut , and on the other hand, such information is being reported from various foreign sources, from some ukrainian specialists and from these russian bloggers that there is quite a lot of support that has approached the russian army and they are pressuring quite powerfully and there are dangers and encirclement and coverage and a counter-offensive of the russian already now, and on the other hand, other people say that there is so much that in the soviet union now in the krep district, the ukrainian , that is, the defense line of defense is so powerful that it is unlikely that anything can change it for you to say what optimism or pessimism do you have? well, for sure we will have to talk about realism, and there really is an extremely difficult situation, which

demonstrates, let's say, the occupying army of russians is approaching once again, and this is a political goal - these are political tasks with losses of equipment and especially manpower, they do not count, the losses of racists in battles are colossal, and they last only on a daily basis, and we are talking about ... the defense system has prepared a lot of things, everything that can be collected now is being sown today under the cloud. well, let's say from the point of view of the fire mission , from the point of view of the assault units, there is a really difficult situation there, ukrainians are heroically defending their land and i am convinced that they will defend then another environment, another question well, i'm just not a military man, so i won't be able to

formulate it correctly, but, well, that's the day 2 3 5 10 20 30 russian troops are coming ukrainian troops are destroying them and below day 2 3 4 5 23 well, it's coming some the moment from the point of view of the russian troops, russian generals, russian ordinary soldiers, well, i will not go forward on the 40th day, because i know that 30 days before that i did nothing, only everyone around me died, that is, there must be some sort of regrouping for the retreat i will advance somewhere to the left, go to the right, get away from that bahmut somehow, think differently, it’s just me, i don’t see any prospects if the ukrainians stand firm, the russians ca n’t do anything for months.

even by military logic, when people really die under all conditions, but there is some meaning to death . i apologize during the war. but there is some senseless death during the war. if you said, you bet very much. of the army or the british army but we are talking about the horde, where about the horde, where the opinion of soldiers and even officers is worthless , the moral and psychological state of the russian army is of no interest to anyone, first of all, the military and political leadership of russia itself is not interested in first of all, of course, putin, who cynically meets, as it were, with the materials of russian military personnel and talks about the fact that it is good that they are dying because if it were not for the war,

they would have died, i think that after such sales, talking about those interceptions, the numbers show that it is moral - the psychological state of the russians is really extremely low, critically low , there is no frontal attack in the next, next, frontal attack, and we are talking about both the cadre military and especially the partially mobilized and even provageners eh if it was the decision of the russian military this senseless meat grinder meat grinder in which they simply physically destroy a large number of the russian military as if it did not exist but decisions are made, for example in the military decisions are made by crazy dictators then the last question but it is interesting and then why not as if to say to the protest with my feet. well, okay, if i see that everyone

around me has died, i will try to escape somewhere. i know that i am a prisoner, back, forward, raise some flags there, crawl somewhere. well, in short, there is the instinct of self-preservation, humanity would not have survived. i am already beginning to doubt that russians are people, that this is homosapping, humanity would not have survived if there was no instinct for self-preservation, the animal world would not survive if there was no instinct for self-preservation, tens of hundreds of thousands of soviet soldiers shot aliens during the second world war it was as if after 37-38 years. well, there was some idea of ​​the victory of the cylindzma on a world-wide historical scale, then the question arises, mr. andriy. and the moral and psychological state is terrible then what is

going on in the heads of these people. well, we have to run away . is it somehow possible to pretend that i died there so as not to inflict a new injury on myself? if you want to give up or run back, the plowing recipe is not actively used by russian soldiers. there are a large number of those who refuse. whole groups of restorers who, however, are now sitting in russia, they are already in basements in the temporarily occupied territories, which are sometimes repressed, sometimes they are simply shot, that is, from voting with their feet. in this situation, there is not an isolated character, but in general here and there there is no civil society inside russia itself, nor any self-respecting subjectivity , according to the middle of the russian army, however, this is not a new situation, similar things happened during the first world war, so i think that

soldier riots we will only see the instinct of self-preservation in the rashists. if it existed in a political body called the russian federation in ukraine and crimea, neither the events in donbas nor the full-scale invasion simply did not happen there is no instinct for self-preservation, which means that they were not affected by political evolution, respectively. we thank andriyusova, the representative of the press service of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense of ukraine, for detailed answers to our questions. thank you very much. we will now move to germany. i was surprised serhii is a smart german political scientist, i hope we will see him now, mr. serhii show yourself, don’t show yourself, it’s a

pity no, i won’t show you now, welcome to you serhii with me german political scientist. good health, mr. sergiu . thank you for finding the time on friday evening, and look. well, what is this so-called pooch, what is this? it is not serious. because when there is a pooch on the territory of the former ussr, it is always a lot of blood, a lot of problems and in kyrgyzstan and in ukraine the last one is not a coup, it’s just a revolution, or we see it is an attempt to take lukashenko’s power two years ago, or we see the russian white house in moscow there in 1993, it’s always shorter, but here if they suddenly said in us there are some problems here there is the 13th, or what is his name, here is a nobleman, some kind of aristocrat, and he headed it, but whether it was or not

. what was it, of course, of course, of course, it was indeed an attempt to create a mutiny of an organization with the aim of seizing power. to understand the next paper, first of all, who are these reisburgers, that is, the translation means citizens of the empire, citizens of the reich, this is one of the most widespread german theories of language and such correct ideas, people who share it believe that the modern federal republic germany that it does not exist as a country and that it is some kind of secret private company, an llc , in fact g mecha in german theory that was registered allegedly in the 49th year by the americans e in order to manipulate german society and precisely because it is allegedly not a state but a private company, then no police there

, the parliament, the government. well, nothing is real, and that is why he needs this state, no less, not to obey, not to pay taxes . of the empire that existed during the time of the german emperor kaiser before the first world war and then so it was during the time of the nazis so this organization is not an organization . 1,000 people in germany who share these ideas of course not all of them are ready for violence but in this case 25 people were arrested and searches were conducted in more than a hundred houses not only in germany but also in italy and austria, and so on

among these 25 arrested are people who are representatives of the army, i.e. a former colonel of the german landing forces, representatives of special forces. is this all a special task force? the most powerful german aristocratic families were once they were sovereigns of the state in prison until the 18th year, their state was part of empire, now this family is very numerous , this is the growth of heimrich the 13th - royce. he is not the head of this family, he is one of those outsiders, but still he is a real royce. and here is his partner, as the

police said, she is some woman who was from russia . as far as i understand, german citizenship, but she was born and grew up in russia, so uh, some uh, in italy, vitalya b, and it is alleged that she even tried to organize contacts, they organized contacts of this henry, this future kaiser, that is, how they wanted with the russian uh the consulate and with representatives of russia. here is the question of whether they could really seize power, of course not. and whether they could arrange uh, that means uh, a shooting and the murder of ministers, parliamentarians , etc., of course, and we remember that it was the murder of parliamentarians let's say in armenia in 90 ce in the ninth year, if i'm wrong. what was earlier in 97, when government representatives were killed in the parliament building? it's just that the entire top of the

reformation armenian government was killed, as it is believed, also by order of the russian special services it's up to you to ask, have you read this interview angels merkel's website, are you not surprised that england does not admit its mistakes in principle. and you know the first interview in which she did not admit it. therefore, now after this interview, i am not surprised because others and interview they were also about the fact that she did everything supposedly right and it's just that the world is wrong and she did everything right, and in general, of course , surprised, surprised precisely because, well, merkel is a scientist, and she's a scientist, practically, she 's a chemist and physicist, and in principle, well, i am like a person i always believed

that the basic basic ability to be a scientist is to ask oneself a critical question and admit one's mistakes, and this is how merkel defended her dissertation as well absolutely normal how people say normal such a good dissertation is very, very powerful, it means something there in some way or something, with a plan, i don't know about it, but it 's too difficult for me, but how can she not ask herself such a question? it's not clear to me either many talked to people about it and they all share the same disappointment and say, well, she looked so calm, so calm, so balanced, so not immersed in any emotions, and here we see that this axis image he was kind of like that, you know, that kind of fake, that kind of mask. and what was actually completely

unclear. that is, she looks like she looked much more serious and smarter than who she is. this, of course, is one of the biggest disappointments of mr. sergiu . more about merkel is just a clarifying question. maybe, as they say in russia, the casket was just opened, she can be internal, as you might say, osi, yes, that is, an oriental-mute ged-g de rafka with a taste of srsrki , she simply cannot imagine that a good russia is even led by such a mediocrity between good and bad putin, what he must have looked like in front of her . well, she couldn't. well, she couldn't attack ukraine. she, this russia, completely disregards european norms of civilized behavior and she just really said, come on, it won't happen

war, what are you all nervous about? putin will not attack zelenskyi or ukraine. well, she can be sincere, that's the question. i don't think that this is related to any men from the gdr. western macron is also western. there is some kneisel . you won’t find the minister of foreign affairs of austria who went to work either, or there is the minister of macro, the minister of france, fillon, who moved to work in russia. he , too, is not with communist germany, right. there in merkel this is her ender past, and they played their role , it's not clear, it's obvious that she completely neglected the interests of the neighboring countries of poland , ukraine, others, and had such a

look down on them. you know her behavior, such red flags, well, let's say she once put a portrait of catherine the second of the russian empress on her table, considering her to be such a role model, meaning a strong, powerful woman who ruled russia, completely ignoring the role of catherine the second there in the final establishment in the russian empire of the most rigid and immoral system of serfdom there when people were simply deprived of everything when there the life of serfs and serfs it was probably even worse than well and exactly the same how is the life of slaves there in i don't know in the southern states oh yes she put it on the table for herself it is not clear that there was

ignorance lack of empathy or the ability for some kind of you know for some kind of megalomania in me that is, i can honestly say for the first time in years merkel i liked her very much, mainly because of the contract as a zashuriloder, schrüder obviously led a more luxurious life than a german politician could afford, and because of this he went to gazprom, that is, he loved luxury there, you looked at everything and merkel was emphasized and refused it there for 10 years in a row, she went to the same resort, also the same courses, in the same sneakers. that is, she was absolutely like that. hmm so much you know, calm down, but it seems that she had other

points on which it was possible to fart, and it must have been some kind of mania. well, there are no, you know , fantasies about the fact that she is such an extraordinary, great, absolutely unique woman, which means that she can be at the level of an empress. it seems that there really was something in this, mr. serhiu, one more question, this is famous. well, now they are talking about this at one time or another, something about this was mentioned about this guarantee of the security of the russian federation . to the west of europe, what does this mean? what do they mean by the security guarantees of the russian federation, as if the russian federation was not threatened by anyone until recently, but the russian federation was threatened

? with all these security guarantees, where did they come from and what is meant, this is the main thing well, to be honest, when i hear about security guarantees for russia, i did not understand what we were talking about. that is, for me, it is like talking about security guarantees for the nazis, eh against the jews, that the jews allegedly threaten them, well, let's talk in 1943 about the fact that it is necessary to negotiate with hitler and, er, it means forcing the jews to provide security guarantees to the nazis, well, no one threatened russia when russia talked about security guarantees, then it is obvious that this there was asimism in order for west a to refuse any support from russia's neighbors so that west recognized russia's full political sovereignty over all countries and allowed russia to do whatever it wanted in

these countries, that's all, that is, it's not about no one should attack russia there, because no one planned to attack russia and never attacked russia there, after the collapse of the ussr, no one attacked russia, russia attacked moldova, georgia, ukraine, so it actually bought belarus, it is constantly threatened to the baltic countries, it means that it sent troops to kazakhstan and and and and that is, guarantees of the security of russia - that is, if a western politician does not talk about this , he knew that or they do not understand absolutely what it is about and they are simply not capable fulfill their uh responsibilities in the international arena or are they just uh playing on putin's side because they are using his lying terminology and actually moving the discussion from a constructive

constructive plane about real threats and real problems to a fantasy plane in which since we start use the kremlin 's vacubulary, then we cannot achieve any normal result in this discussion space. well , it's the same as if you use an incorrectly calibrated tool, then you will never be able to to achieve the right results because you simply do not have a system in which you work. oh, the guarantee of security is firmly russian. it is the same as the neutrality of ukraine. the neutrality of ukraine has never been an issue for the russians. at the level of non-priority, let's say switzerland. and this was always the idea that uh, which had the principle of actually cheerfulness of ukraine in front of

russia, uh, the neutrality of ukraine was actually the neutrality of the west, which refused to support ukraine in the event of a threat from of russia the neutrality of ukraine was the idea of ​​giving ukraine over completely to the use of russia and not losing all of it, one more question or group of questions, there is simply not much time, and this forum of free peoples, which is being opened in sweden, has been opened and you are participating there, as far as we know please tell me this is something serious, maybe it’s not a good question, but if i don’t see any reason to look at it so seriously, because it’s really good, wonderful people, maybe they were wonderful politicians in europe, well, where there is no russian totalitarianism, but at the moment it does not

look like something that could really end in the disintegration of russia, what do you say, you know, first of all, i was surprised to read on the twitter account of aleksey navalny’s supporters that i am participating in this form of sweden. i worked i haven't heard anything about sweden and all the other people there, which means they are supporters of oleksii navalny, they mean they once read there at the beginning of the lesson, so they probably started writing about what a terrible person he is, which means i want to to destroy russia there from a nuclear strike on russia means other things, but in this swedish forum i did not hear anything about it, i did not participate ukraine participates indeed, i was several months ago at this forum of the free peoples of russia in prague, prague is not sweden, it is in the czech republic, and i made a reference there about how the disintegration of russia and its potential

looks or will look from the point of view of the german political establishment because they wanted to hear whose ideas are supported by the germans, i frankly said that from the point of view german in they will not have any support because, without germany's point of view, russia must be preserved, just as the west wanted the preservation of the soviet union . well, well, here, as it were, they have to do it themselves, probably count on the support of ukraine, because ukraine really has competence there will be nothing on the part of germany about your question whether russia is disintegrating or not. i personally believe that it is disintegrating and i personally want this because i think that only in this way can peace be achieved on the borders of russia because all wars in which persons they took part, she led them because she remained too large and tried, she was not a phantom, and she tried to restore the

soviet union, she was too strong for that , she had nuclear weapons and she was permanent, she had the opportunity to do it with impunity oh, and if russia falls apart, hmm, the neighbors will live peacefully and the russians too, because the russians will not have uh. so there are prospects of dying by the tens of thousands in ukraine, there in syria, go there to die in central africa. they will not finance palaces there putin or there is a stable or someone else, that is, they have a chance to finally live normally. the same way how do ukrainians live normally, how do estonians live there, how do people live there? i don't know armenia there, which does not start world wars there, that's why i think that i think that the collapse of russia - this is a real prospect because russia has nothing to hold on to except the moscow center and moscow power as soon as moscow

power ends and it ends objectively in ukraine, then the tatars and bashkirs, sooner or later, not these peoples and their elites, too, just like and the ussr also disintegrated, including from the desire of the ellipses , but they will decide that it is easier for them to live independently because, well, look who was nazarbayev in the 90th year, the first secretary of the communist party of kazakhstan, gorbachev was actually his leader a year after that, we already earned money was the president, and gorbachev gave lectures at universities for 20 years after that, he still calls president gorbachev his son is going to contribute, that is, the head of tatarstan or bashtistan will have the will to retain the position of an independent president and to be there in the organization of the united nations, to speak out , and then it will disappear somewhere. so, to survive this regime collapse, that's why i think it will be good for everyone.

why are the russians afraid? well, i think they simply do not understand themselves without an empire, if they understood that their life will be much better without the empire, they agreed to it simply by calculation, they are trivially simpler. serhiy serhiy , an honest german political scientist explained to us that russia can fall apart, join the community with a ukrainian view of the world, become a sponsor youtube channel espresso and this is access to exclusive content, personal thanks, fixed comments , special icons and the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team, click to sponsor and become part of the community with a ukrainian perspective