approximately 3 million dollars were destroyed by rioters and the house that was the residence of a benefactor on almost 700 m². this year there will be no new year's entertainment in the flower garden. and guests will be waiting in the spring, but new year's locations have started working in kyiv, in particular at the capital expo center, there is also an ice rink and they will offer you delicious snacks and it will also be possible to warm yourself by the fire if it is frozen due to a power outage in the capital, all locations at the capital expo center work in an energy-saving way, the festive illumination will be turned off, and business will be attracted by generators dmytro didora oleksandr budlevych yehor nikitenko and all regions news on espresso the news team told you about the most important thing for today so see you tomorrow let's see

how people who suffer from rheumatism and arthrosis live, it's changing, yes, i smeared dolgit in the morning now let dolgit cream relieve pain, reduce swelling and improve mobility joints, because the joints are already broken, the only yellow cream for pain in the joints and back, ask at pharmacies , dobrogo dnya pharmacy and one social pharmacy, dolgyt cream 100 g with a 20% discount, a special project, mundiala the espresso tv channel history seven brings to brazil the first gold of the world cup era the england national team will receive an award from the hands of queen elizabeth victory at any cost kadi his maradona great champions zidane heads the goal of the french national team

the owner of the home world cup idols brazilian ronald in germany provocations materazzi provokes zidane the legend leaves field long-awaited trophy 116th minute of the match and meat for everyone go drama how hard it is to look at leo messi now the world championship is still out of reach for the argentine nova generation by filian mbappe national hero of france watch the special project football format mundial on espresso tv channel from monday to saturday at 2:40 p.m. and on sunday at 11:10 a.m. let's see how people who suffer from rheumatism and arthrosis live, it's changing so i smeared dolgit in the morning now let the dolgit cream numb the pain reduces swelling and

improves the mobility of the joints because the joints are already breaking the only yellow cream for pain in the joints and back, ask at the pharmacies good day pharmacy and one social pharmacy dolgit cream 100 g with a 20% discount ! the saturday political club program anzhelika sezonka is on the air, we welcome you, friends. good evening. as usual, in the first half of our program, we will talk about the situation at the front, and we already have the first speaker ivan stupak, a military expert, an employee of the sbu . we congratulate you, mr. ivan. good evening. to be serhii grabsky, i hope he

will join on the air, is he already in us? is happening in the east, first of all, the president says that bakhmut has been turned into ruins, the fighting continues in many important localities in donbas, how does it all look from the point of view of the development of the situation, let's start with you, mr. ivan, so look at the foot, my personal vision. i see that there is already this really bakhmut is a political component, i really do not see a military goal of any kind, the russians have a political component, there is prigozhin, there are his wagnerites, who have a task, which, who have a goal to take bakhmut at any cost. and if we climb a step higher then you have to understand that the parishioner took on a political commitment, that he was given opportunities, that he was

given equipment, that people were given to him in prisons there by the wagnerites, and that you have to understand that prigozhyn is a partner in a small way, a partner with the rights of the junior partner of the kovalchuk brothers, that is, he is now very is close to putin's orbit and there are great hopes for him, and now i think he is trying to realize his expectations that are entrusted to him, but he is not able to do it, and here he is pushing a little more and pushing a little more it seems that everything will work out, but it does not work. serhiy is under pressure, because it has already lasted for more than 120 days, and why is it so difficult there? is it directly related to the number of russians? is it directly possible with the quality of their military personnel? in this direction or there, there is more equipment, because from kyiv oblast, kharkiv oblast and parts of it our army managed to quickly liberate the kherson region and these territories from the russian occupiers,

you know. let's start with a little historical excursion and understand that from the very beginning the focus was on that direction to about 50% of the entire contingent of russian troops who fought on the ukrainian front, and in addition, it was necessary to understand that the task facing the enemy from the very beginning was the capture or, as they said, the liberation of the donetsk region, and therefore this task was together with the military had an absolutely political basis and i completely agree with mr. ivan that now it has become more political, but you know from a military point of view i said today that there is a certain sense in what is happening if you say exclusively from a military point of view, because now the enemy is attacking with such assaults. and it is necessary to understand that they are using irregular units, because if you look at the list of units of the enemy operating in the direction of bakhmut, we will see that these are wagnerites, they are the lpr

and the dpr. that is, they are not stryi units of the russian army this is light infantry and such desperate attacking actions, you know, are typical for the russians, creating the impression that pressure is exerted and in this way we are forced to throw our units in this direction as well, and this, according to the russians, should delay the advance of our troops in the luhansk direction and in the zaporizhzhia direction, and here i absolutely agree with mr. ivan that prigozhin is now playing an increasingly important role and he is trying to earn some political capital in any way, at any cost, and how is that possible it doesn't sound cynical, but the financial capital, because the promotion is, rather, the attempt to storm bakhmut, brought to the u.s. by units is also connected with the fact that part of the financial

flow allocated to the armed forces of the russian federation is distributed to prigozhina's private military company, and it must be understood that using the contingent he has, the costs are minimal and the income is obvious, because in fact he does not spend anything on preparation for provisioning, throws them into battle , performing the task of attracting to himself units of the armed forces of ukraine and at the same time he earns, well, let’s say quite good money, we faced such a situation that in 2014, when the enemy recruited so-called heads, as they called them, and sent them to slaughter in the donbass, i.e. approximately the situation looks like this to me what do you think mr. ivano, this is basically what they are saying now that the united states is no longer against ukraine striking military facilities of the russian federation we have seen these strikes

on airfields in russia this really changes the course of the war . look at it, it's a beautiful game. i really like it. the americans play very cool with the russians. first of all, they say so. we do not encourage the country to attack the military facilities of the russian federation. on its territory, but who are we to forbid them? this is such a beautiful, very beautiful, high-quality game, and in this way it turns out that they do not provoke us, they do not help us, but neither can they ban it, and the ukrainians themselves are free to choose which, well, conditionally free, which target to hit on the territory of the russian federation right here is a big the condition is that this goal is not civilian, that it is military , and it is very important that the military is connected with the war in ukraine, that is, if you are there an airfield, then what airfield is it?

a-a provides fuel for the military part of the territory of occupied ukraine, that is, for this. and this is really very cool and the americans will be at your side . i apologize, and the russians have nothing to say. well, they can’t directly blame the americans. and who is the beautiful diplomat here? please, ukrainians, do what you want. we we cannot forbid, even the cautious germans have also expressed the position that ukraine can, defending its territorial integrity, strike on the territory of russia in order to prevent, er, further strikes from bombers on infrastructure or on civilian objects, as the russians do on our territory, mr. serhiu, but ukraine has not officially recognized that it was us who carried out these attacks in engels and dyagelevo. however , if we talk about this type of drone, what kind of drone is it and whether for example, we have

such ones available that could make a flight - the distance there seems to be 750 kilometers, you know, of course, we can not talk about what type of drones there are, uh, it will be such a certain dissonance because we already uh, what we didn't take on responsibility regarding the use of such drones. i have a personal opinion, well, based on the fact that i communicated with the guys. well, i don't have the right to announce it yet, what it actually was and how it worked, but i have the conviction that we can inflict such blows absolutely, and i hope that we will receive full support from our allies in the future of such strikes. i, having served in the soviet army, remember that strizhi , and i am sorry. precisely in the format earth earth well, because this is this

unmanned aerial vehicle, it is intended for a little bit of other things well, for now, for some reason, i want to say that this is a sheared, let there be shears, and can we use the technique? in the 15th year, ukraine made a lot of efforts to develop such a technique, to say that we achieved extremely great efforts, well, probably not, because you understand there was a certain break from the 19th year, which objectively stopped our progress on this direction can we resume such e-e developments yes, we resume and will e-e develop them i would say more despite the fact that we will not e-e receive drones from the united states and we can simply be told technological moves to avoid mistakes in this direction therefore , i have absolutely no doubt that we will not receive such developments. so

let's stop at this for the time being. and i would like you to define another accent and aspect why america is not against it, just count the colossal funds that america is currently investing in ukraine in order to support us, and well, you know. well , as they say in lviv, it would go to stupid dogs if they didn't, if they started denying ukraine's right to strike because these strikes actually destroy american money. thus, america is in including, with such a virtuoso move , she emphasizes that she advocates for the protection of her interests, her er money and the interests of her voters. what kind of money is allocated why? by the way, ivan ivanovich used to say that er iranian drones do not appear in our skies because it prevents them from hiking, but now we see that the weather hasn't changed and the drones have appeared again, what happened to the real reasons, maybe they just weren't there maybe it's a new batch of iranian drones that appeared in our country well, i was really surprised by this story,

says oh, the same iranian they don't fly either at night or in the winter because it's cold in iran. yes yes yes well, i really had a strange thought that everything is still freezing there, those are the details from the conventional epicenter from the iranian one, it's all freezing. i think that, well, most likely there was a problem well, the drone itself was not they are available. and by the way, not so long ago, mr. danilov reported that the place was apparently struck, the place was struck, where the group of these drones together with the iranian instructors was located, maybe it still very much slowed down the russians, eh, with these signs and with the third party. i i see it ah, how? i look at it from the point of view of intelligence. i think it is possible that there is a problem with uh-e targets, they cannot find out the targets that are in ukraine, where to hit, first of all, you need to do intelligence before the development, analyze the

previous strikes, which were successful and unsuccessful. well there conditionally divided into three columns, we definitely didn’t hit here, we need to shoot down again here, they were wounded, well, all the utivites mine, don’t mine, and here 100% destroyed, you can come here next month, don’t shoot. it’s necessary to conduct reconnaissance, send all the fire adjusters, everyone works for us in the bodies of dogs. i apologize to the sbu it periodically reveals that uh, it slips out, but they are there, they report to moscow there, all this is done in a generalized, generalized analysis, and then it is already transferred to the troops for a whole, whole testimony there, but for three weeks there was such a pause with these chess ladies it's in the south, but still these five hit the infrastructure in odesa, which is critical, now some of them

are completely without current pauses, we have ppu systems promised by partners a-a regarding statistics, it is unique because when we conducted certain combat calculations when planning the operation, the efficiency of the systems per piece was calculated with er-er raw data of 25-30%. therefore beating more than fifty percent of air targets - this is more than better, it is a unique opportunity in general, especially if we are talking about shaheds, do you understand shaheds or drones in general - these are systems well, how come air defense systems were not actually developed for defense, even against drone defense, this is quite a new weapon and on such a scale it has not been used so massively so we are literally on the move and i will say very virtuoso effectively solve this problem no

air defense system can ever in its life to ensure 100% defeat of all air forces. this must be understood, and that is why the enemy is now using them in large quantities, starting from the position that at least one will fly, and in this way. well, why hide a sin? they sometimes achieve their goal and this is also an objective reality so uh we are working on it now and you know here is another interesting feature in answering your questions about the supply of new weapons and referring to air defense uh there was information and there was even a video when our national guardsmen shot down cheetah systems and a cruise missile, and this is an indicator of how quickly we are mastering the art, so to speak, or the algorithms of creating multi-zone air defense. when in fact an anti-aircraft

artillery system shoots down an operational-tactical missile, well, for the destruction of which more serious complexes are actually assigned and this means the organization of interaction, this means reconnaissance, this means bringing under the target and destroying the target, which has a sub- sonic speed, and it is precisely with this that the high the effectiveness of our counteraction to that new weapon, which is chess, because you and i had not even heard of it until the summer, and it is a new weapon, believe me, the military military system is quite conservative and always not always a turning point in order to quickly to react to this, therefore, these are very good indicators, despite the fact that we receive such blows on our territory, by the way, let's continue this topic of shahedov, ivan, they are now talking about the fact that russia is starting a new round of military-technical cooperation today the ministry of defense of great britain said that russia is ready to give the wound some unprecedented

military access in exchange for the continuation of missiles and the supply of missiles and drones. what could this mean in reality? what is unprecedented military access , help in the creation of nuclear weapons? repeatedly asked to russia. please help us suppress them. i think that it is behind such loud words that the rascality is hidden to send there and therefore know a thousand of their conditionally 1,000 of their policemen there or the special equipment that russia has. by the way, they can’t build a car, they can’t. but they built equipment for de-homomanification, they showed off there and this and shields and the world, noise grenades and lights and straboscopes, that is, i think this equipment is the first now the iranians need a turn in order to suppress mass uprisings and to establish normal

cooperation with the russians in supplying them with drones , and well, there was a conversation about political missiles, but let's see how it will work, but still see the link mathematics doesn't sleep either. they start and want to beat the tails, but they beat the iranian drone program . that there was a serious conversation between the united states government and the representatives of these companies so that what details were discovered by the drone so that they would be more attentive to unknown buyers who suddenly appear and say give us 500 of this 500 of that and a thousand of that so that at least if it is clear that it will be for unmanned programs and that it can be blocked ."

uh, you know, i would say, i repeat again, that starting from april, we are observing a constant increase in uh, the combat capability and readiness of the belarusian corps of the russian army to enter the war. does this mean that they are beginning to uh, prepare professionally and practically no, they do not start, but it is precisely such demonstration actions , including from the point of view of military planning, the operational art consists precisely in that to keep our e-e forces on the border with belarus in this way, diverting from other directions, to date no e-e strike groups have been observed, which testified that the belarusians will soon be able to

launch an offensive from belarusian land, an air operation is already underway and it is objectively, but a land operation the component is not yet ready, unable to enter the driver, mr. ivan, your opinion, come on, i agree, mr. serhiy, it’s really not visible there yet, and besides, see well, they are mass- exporting battles to fall, but the mass happened from belarus heavy equipment, well, from the point of view of logic, there remains a large, well, the objective number of infantry and equipment is less and less, ammunition is less, it is somehow difficult to act when you have no equipment and no ammunition for artillery of heavy equipment, that is, a two-fold situation. well, i am sure that our military intelligence commands will see in advance the preparations for the invasion if it will even be planned heard thank you gentlemen for participating in our broadcast and ivan stepak, a military expert of the sbu during the years 2004-15 and serhiy hrab military expert, participant in peacekeeping missions, reserve colonel, we are moving

forward to international events that affect the situation in ukraine, yuriy rashkin, a political and public figure in the united states, bloggers, we will be in touch, yuriy, greetings in general what is happening in the relations between the united states of ukraine exactly against the background of the statement that the united states is no longer afraid of strikes on the russian military infrastructure from ukraine, and until recently it turned out to be a tabulated topic even for discussion, yes, and you you know, we see, uh, maybe the last regime proved to us, well, not with their ability, and uh, as if with their own butts, apparently, but not with what they can do, and we decided that it is necessary for ukraine to win , that's how no one argued with them, that's all -е этого хотиле and now a-a we are already talking about

such sums about such attacks a-a that speak simply and how would our confidence in the fact that uh apparently the victory of ukraine is now even possibly more important than a sharp threat сейчас ниже е-е чем он он конкую в асулев because they enlarged it the ukrainian strikes are not far away, it is impossible to say that this is a car, that the pentagon is encouraging, in the sense of no resolution, it is invisible, it is not supported, but it is very nice to see it, it encourages all of us, and it proves that ukrainians can do more that's what they say there we just collect these drones and allow them and it 's fine, but on the other hand, it's also a rank so that the united states now apparently decided that these are two elements that cannot be moved, it turned out to be in another place let's see

let's look at the interesting topic of putin's statements, in fact, in particular, about the fact that it is possible that there will not be an annual press conference and a direct line with the people for the first time in 10 years. they talked about it very much with interest because this is one of the expressions that was remembered here that you don't believe anyone, eh, you can believe me, they say so, eh, english-speaking americans, our readers, viewers reacted very much to it , somehow this demonstrates that what is happening, what kind of country is this? what kind of regime is this

? buter and somehow all of this is perceived as a practical one whole idea that on the one hand we exchanged our wonderful basketball player for a merchant of death a-a on the other hand at this time putin is there in a conference explaining how great ahn is a-a so what eh he has how are you doing here? well, he’s trying, plus now, his wife means that you’re new to the green states in russia . well, you know, i had such an experience. i contacted people who had relatives captured in eastern ukraine two hours ago . i contacted our

senators, senator bolben, and the congressman. ah, and i say, as if there is something that we can do such a situation and we will talk with me. and they said, you know the best chances for those countries that we help, that we give some finances , they listen to us there. visible wants to save only the merchant of death, er, and what he tells at the same time, how is he, er, how big is he? how can he use a nuclear threat from one country, and from the other side, he will not do this from the first place, but he plays with it as c like a toy i'm returning to the previous question, eh, this is how it gets more and more meaningless. and what do you think, in principle, about putin's current tactics ? american strategy. she is so

aggressive. but with us, it is only a retaliatory strike, and they are a hoto-preemptive strike. here we are, too, uh, we will deal with a preventive strike. i am leaning towards the version of what he says, usually it is to say, until all the truth of what he thinks a-a , he apparently does not have any options left. he does not have that opportunity. the problem is that it is not important what he says. the problem is that it is necessary. monitors what he is doing and we are still our class how does it convey to the public space that they do not see signs of the fact that there is some kind of heightened readiness that something is going on in this regard, uh, that's why his statement somehow loses its meaning a- and on the other hand, so much how many times can you threaten if you are already even here is the philosophy that it is necessary to strike first if there is a fight but now they are already hitting the crimea, they are hitting the

airfield in russia, where is it, eh, the first strike, so he somehow proves again that - э чем больше он всё возможное это the king turned out to be simply naked, but politics did not understand him. he drifted away from this topic for the last months, tried to pretend that there were no nuclear threats and that there were talks about some kind of negotiations, and piskov and lavrov and propagandistic media and in the kremlin, but now he raised this topic, why is it a good question, and we explained to the chinese and the cia that it is not necessary to talk about it, this is a bad topic, eh, we see, it is necessary to discuss it only for us on the air. the topic cannot be touched on because it will be catastrophic in the end. the national security advisor jaxileven also made it clear that this was said again and again and again

, so he seems to have heard it, but ah, apparently his situation is so terrible, and we hear more and more that except for rumors, and the nuclear threat in russia is somehow and so the army turned out to be fake in the sense that their effectiveness does not stand up to it, and it's not even nato soldiers. it's not the full power of what it would turn out that we might have a-a, although it seems that looking at what was happening, we observe that it is not clear how ukraine is not the best fighters now, if they were to join nato a-a, but nevertheless, er-e what can it be, this is a threat that they are becoming more and more just puffed-up threats, and at the same time, the risk remains, so to speak this is not going to happen, that's why we just continue to do what can be done