therefore, we have definitely come a long way, we will definitely reach the desired result in ukraine, but any terms will be deceptive, and i do not want to deceive people oleksandr matviychuk, head of the center for civil liberties, who received the nobel peace prize this year, said in his nobel lecture about the fact that trials of post-war criminals such as putin and lukashenko should be started before victory, we should not wait for the final, as it was after the second world war, and now, in your opinion, should it be started? be such that the special tribunals in russia will work even before ukraine wins, you know that in 1942 the allies of the anti-hitler coalition decided that they would condemn the top of the nazi regime and the victory came

only in the 45th year, i certainly do not imply that the war of russia against ukraine will last so long, but this is a very important story that tells us that we need to prepare for the tribunal and start at least collecting evidence in advance, and not wait for victory, this is exactly what we are working on so that the tribunal is not all brought immediately, put on trial, it is a certain process, it must take place in accordance with the principle of the rule of law, that is why the prosecutor must work, the prosecutors must work to follow up, the collection of evidence, it is clear that this process must be launched before the victory, that is, as soon as possible, so that the victory is as soon as possible the time has come for the armed forces of ukraine to be able to choose it, we definitely need even more help from the armed forces, and germany still

cannot decide whether to transfer leopard 2 tanks to ukraine or not, what is the reason for the hesitation psychology, how to change it, we are actively working on it, we are conducting therapy . this is a question of some kind of rational e-e explanation, that's why we are grateful germany really handed over to us the very important samples of weapons that i have already mentioned, these are really important things for us, we are grateful but we don't see any

a rational argument against the fact that these tanks were handed over to us, which means that this is a question in the field of psychology. so, we will work with it until we get what we need as well. by the way, when these tanks were lost, they told us that you never we were told the same thing about air defense, but we got everything and there will be tanks too. well, we all remember how germany's aid started with 5,000 helmets ago, the progress is obvious, but the problem is that russia also conducts its diplomatic work with those who ready to supply weapons before everything with iran, what can our partners do so that russia does not receive ballistic missiles from iran, these efforts are more, i would say so, in the sub-nuclear sphere, that is, diplomatic steps are being taken, steps are being taken to investigate the pali of intelligence

agencies in order to, uh, as much as possible to slow down and in the future stop the cooperation between russia and iran in the military sphere, we sent a very clear and simple signal to iran that no matter what benefits russia attracts you, this cooperation is negative the consequences of the actions of ukraine and its partners in response to this cooperation will be much higher than any benefit and they heard it , let's look at their actions in the coming month and in connection with this settlement of cooperation russia iran our chances of receiving the patriot air defense well petros is already a symbol, you know. even if we get all the most modern ppp systems in the world, but we don't get at least one petriv system

, the work will be recognized as the existence of lvivska, which is not satisfactory. they started talking about petrivtsi, by the way, in my opinion, before the start of the war, i first raised the issue of providing the patriots system to the united states in the very first week of the war, the president is working a lot on this issue, and i will tell you yes . now there is this movement, but i say once again that everything has its own time, there is no need to rush, we are doing everything possible and even more .

joined dmytro kuleba the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine was in touch with us now there is a short pause and a news release strengthen the borders of ukraine to drones join the gathering of border guards this is my country my fields my friends brothers parents children neighbors students doctors teachers soldiers we are all regardless of age faith likes beliefs we are all united now we will win glory to ukraine he doesn't look like in the movies he is a dirty cold and terrible war smells of blood sweat war leaves

its mark on everyone who has been there remember about this, when you see a person in military uniform with such eyes, remember what price our heroes pay every day, we respect them. we thank them, we help them and we will definitely win. history cool sweat and hot tears about the heart that remains alive about the soul that was born the free history of my earth where the new destiny

of an unbreakable country is forged metal in my hands and in the bodies of my enemies in the voice that promises us victory together we we make this world stronger, ukrainians, a nation of steel people, the rules of a warm country, healthy care . thank you for adjusting the heater and monitoring the sufficient temperature without spending money on the wind. let's beat the winter together. or find out in advance where there are landline phones with a fixed connection, in no case download large files via the mobile internet and shorten conversations to

minimum or overloads the network and makes it inaccessible to others, let's defeat the darkness together , the media law that the verkhovna rada can adopt this week, in particular, provides for the strengthening of the role of the national council for television and radio broadcasting , why is this necessary? yana good evening, tell us what new powers will appear in our council in the event of the adoption of the law on media in the form that we know now, this bill well in fact, i have to say that the strengthening of the role of the regulator, which was one of the main conditions that the european commission put before the legislator, it consists not only in new powers, it consists firstly in independence and secondly in they have the right to make decisions without

regard to other central bodies of the executive power , and the third is that it should be a regulator that has the right to decide many things by itself and in cooperation with the industry, that is, since the draft law as a whole introduces co-regulation for the first time as such a large amount of the regulator's work on the market and from the market is among the key comments on the draft law, in particular, the transfer to the national council, authorized to approve the list of persons who pose a threat to national security, such a black list that includes the kirkorovs and other russian artists, media persons , what is the logic of this transfer, why should the national council form these lists and not as it was before the national security council of the sbu and a number of actors in this process

, in fact, in fact, in the version that was adopted in the first reading, it was planned that the national the council as a collegial body that works openly and is responsible for each of its decisions because it has to make efforts to prove any guilt of those whom it is going to add to this list , so to speak. members of the national council as members of the working group on the preparation of the law, but in the end, the path of compromises led us to the fact that in the version that will be in the parliament tomorrow, the day after tomorrow , the existing mechanism remains. today, i think that, to a certain extent, for sure mistrust of the national council of those people who are used to doing this quietly in offices and influencing

in one way or another the heads of the special services or the heads of ministries. i believe that the national council would have handled it much more correctly and more openly and so on, but there are those who are, that is in the version that will be voted on there tomorrow for sure. well, for sure. and we agreed with the document that cancels the role of the national council in creating signatures. we will be only one of those who add their candidates to those lists, well, their candidacies on your opinion. and why was there such a focus on this item and in the end they reached a compromise on it? why is this view just uh and different uh, well, a different way of working with state bodies , and probably those who formed these lists before that found a way to the offices of the special services to the offices of the ministry of

culture and so on. and they understood that the national council, due to its composition and its collegiality, would be absolutely independent in making those decisions, so those decisions, well, that was actually what they opposed, but because for it is more important for us to move on in general, and we and the working group of authors decided that it is probably better to agree to this compromise than to stop the code of the law altogether. to europe about their belonging to european values ​​and so on and for us, the last weeks when we cooperate, we worked with references in the committee, they were quite strange when people hide their true interests and demonstrate just some such

strange positions in order to refuse to move forward in many directions. if we go further along those were to a series of bills passed in the first reading, then e hmm some critics believed that he gave the green light to the return of russian soft propaganda to ukrainian screens because hmm the restrictions stipulated by the law regarding russians, they apply to such, you know, head-on propaganda when glorifying the armed forces of the russian federation of the russian regime and soft versions where ukrainians are simply shown as fools and russians as great representatives of culture - it will be possible to return according to your observations and according to your information about these norms of the law, have they been

revised ? they talked about what happened before the mining, with the participation of the constitutional majority in the council, so that more than three hundred deputies voted for that law, but in reality, in practice, the norm that was voted for by how many deputies did not working because it is simply impossible to recognize someone as a citizen of russia without having the right contact with the authorities of the aggressor state. and you understand that now we cannot send any request to the ministry of internal affairs of russia or to any other service. what should be banned now is a russian cultural product in ukraine. she ended up on the job, so we proposed another mechanism, but in the end, the

primary agreement is that we do not touch the laws that already exist, she once again became part of a compromise, because i repeat, it is more important for us to move forward than to er insist on some eyes that can er overturn the law. because there are people who would like there to be no such law, surprisingly, there are a lot of people in the current council, you talk a lot about compromises , then the question arises a what will radically change after the adoption of the law on media, if on many points, in principle, they agreed to maintain the status quo . and what will change. the main thing is that online media, which today on the market already earn more than traditional media, they will also fall under regulation that is, we equalize the conditions for the existence of the media space and we are between e and e-e traditional

and new media. fortunately, this law also preserves the 9th section, which limits the functioning of russian cultural products on the territory of ukraine, not only during the war, but and for a certain time after the war, about which the council should pass separate laws every year on the extension of this status, we are introducing the institution of prescriptions, which is a kind of option for responding to minor violations, and this is a plus for the entire market this is e for the online media, this is a way to enter the settlement in general. how is it that the online media are not used to it at all and then how they protest against it simply because they don’t want to, namely in the work of the national council, what will change then what will change for the national council will be what we will we will work

, the register of e-mails and licensees and registrants is open, many broadcasts that until then required a license are now brought to the level of simple registration. we are creating an electronic user account in which registrants will be able to take e- mails independently change the data in relation to which they are now asking us a lot of papers and what they are spending a lot of effort on, on the other hand, we see not only the ownership structure in the e-e of our licensees a and its structure of their incomes and expenses, all this makes the market the most transparent, mr. valentyna i think that now our viewers may not listen and think that we are discussing some very internal cuisine that this does not concern them, it is some kind of licensee prescriptions for the consumer of information in ukraine that will change with the adoption of the media law, the consumer may be

i am sure that if there is information about registration in the national council on this or that website, then this media works honestly and openly, and uh, the fact is that now a lot of people are contacting us with certain complaints about uh, various internet resources or we answer that the internet media is out of regulation, then in the future we will er seek to correct errors in the work of not only traditional media such as television , radio a and in the internet, this is first and second, it would generally simply provide new opportunities for society to control the media, since the society of significant measures will control the national council, in your opinion, after the compromises that have already been reached, what are

the chances that this draft law will be passed in the second reading in the near future. well, i will say that if you pass the draft law, it will not be passed, and ukraine will probably take a huge step -e back from their goal of e-e joining the european union, therefore those who tomorrow will push the buttons abstained or against those people who then must be publicly e-e well named and have every responsibility for their decision and to explain this not by some other interests that today also govern them, namely why are they against the european future of ukraine? i think it will be adopted tomorrow, we were joined today by valentin koval, the first deputy chairman of the national council for television and radio broadcasting, who was in touch with the marathon, the only news he is now a short pause and

the final release of the news of ukraine to drones , join the border collection they work in the dark, giving us light even during rocket attacks, despite the weather and danger day and night, they do everything possible so that we have warmth and communication, let there be interruptions, this is prometheus who bring us life, people who have already become heroes, although you will not see them in the news, warriors who will dispel any darkness, our real

knights of light thanks to you, we will survive the winter , you must have energy, thank you, always the first where it is difficult, the first where it is dangerous, the first where the enemy is, the paratroopers are always at the point of attack and in the epicenter of the battle, the paratroopers are always at the height. glory to the airborne assault troops of the armed forces of ukraine rules of a warm country household appliances thank you on behalf of the vacuum cleaner for allowing it to fall into winter hibernation good for health wet cleaning and

your care warms us let's win the winter together i was sometimes told that every day is a difficult day because it is a prison when they were given water to their teeth they started to hate us and we even realized that the more they start beating us there, the better things are with our military the day before, which means ours are winning . heroes are not born, who are you? i thought it was varki and he was pixels for today and that's it there was happiness he said glory to ukraine i wanted to cry from happiness we are ukrainians we ukrainians will definitely win now we can watch how it will look like we have to finish the work of the generations of our parents and we will do it these are the heroes from monday to friday 23:00 in marathon the only news сейчас a lot of noise about putin

talked about what he called the special operation vii for increased activity for the first time, which planes are bombing us, this is exactly the kind of remote control those who attack civilian objects in ukraine are sitting at, the air fleet of the soviet period and the secrets of carcasses the most popular russian bombers in which russian rear, i was not 100% sure of us, that their nuclear materials are not a threat to anything, the west gives tacit consent to how this can change the geography of the war and the fruits will go to the armed forces, as well as an unexpected turn in the belarusian scenario of 100

years of the ussr on december 30 and they really wanted to renew some form of the ussr, eat belarus, is it really preparing a great annexation, all this today in the facts of the week good evening, our unbreakable country, i congratulate you invincible ukrainians facts of the week analyzed the key events of the last few days and we will try to figure out what will happen next, a strategic strike at the level of sinking the cruiser moscow is how experts assessed the strike on airfields in the deep rear of russia, it’s not even that a ukrainian drone damaged several strategic bombers , in fact it slapped putin’s nuclear forces and russian air defense the story is that moscow got closer to the armed forces of ukraine much earlier and

it was difficult to imagine, and it seems that they received tacit consent from the western partners for further such steps about this the influential publication the times wrote that the united states is less afraid of escalation from moscow. but we have known for a long time that they only understand the language of force. so what did the strike on russian airfields change for the course of the war? and stress to the residents of the city moscow sorted it all out, but did the pentagon give tacit consent to ukraine's strikes on objects on the territory of russia, the influential british newspaper times reports this as the next step

may be the provision of long-range weapons by washington to kyiv, the pentagon gives the green light , an article with this title appeared in the british times, it is about the tacit consent of the americans to attacks by ukraine on russian targets in the depths of the country we are not telling kyiv not to attack the russians in russia or crimea we cannot tell them what to do, let them decide how they use their weapons, but when they use the ones we have supplied, we insist only that the armed forces adhere to the international laws of war and the geneva conventions - the source of the times in the pentagon said in the article that the united states is no longer so concerned that attacks on targets inside russia could lead to tactical nuclear strikes by the russian federation on ukraine or nato countries, some experts claim that this is an agreement between the shasa and china, which cannot be ruled out supplies of long-range weapons. are

we talking about tactical attack missiles with a range of up to 300 km or long-range drones ? russia, but the first bells may be the recent attacks on russian airfields, how the geography of the war can change and what will be the reaction of the aggressor country, let's talk with military experts using the example of air bases, this is the facts of the week and i'm alla chyzh. don't forget to subscribe to our youtube channel. this will help to make more high-quality materials for you, the pre-emptive strike drones targeted precisely those military bases from which russia sent bombers for missile attacks on ukraine as a result of at least two planes here 22m3 and tu 95 ms were shot down the russian federation has about 60

working bombers there 95 ms and about the same number of working bombers here 90 here 22m3 and plus they still have tu-16 white swan within about 16 machines but there is a minus point. no one will be able to replace these two machines. the russian federation no longer produces and will not be able to produce such bombers. the ministry of defense of the federation accused ukraine of the strikes. our general staff remains silent, but the main issue is otherwise the operation and what are the consequences of the magresor, because the drones attacked russian missile carriers that are part of the russian nuclear fleet. it includes strategic aviation, intercontinental ballistic missiles and nuclear submarines, so i wasn’t

100% sure that their nuclear power poses no real threat. and if we consider the problems with from a military-technical point of view, we have to realize that the russian federation is finally on the path to the gradation of its armed forces in the technological sense, which the drone itself managed to break through their defense, despite the fact that the russians have always claimed that such complexes as the s-350, such complexes as the f40 triumf , such complexes as the s503m fator, or let's say the newest interchangeable gun complexes pantsir s1 or 9k-330rm have no analogues in the world and are not threatened by this so-called