is there some kind of underground politics in serbia itself ? to what extent do the serbs want to be friends with russia and not be friends with the european community ? certain such pro-russian forces in northern macedonia, you know, also quickly accepted too er considering certain political risks, therefore it is very difficult there for the russians, it is already more difficult to act, it is not difficult it is more difficult to act. in serbia itself, the pro-russian sentiment is huge. perhaps at this moment even a little more than about the european ones. perhaps even a little more than

about the european ones, it is all fueled by russian propaganda and that is the idea of ​​kosovo. this is just right for the pro- russian ones. about the european powers, moscow is playing on it, it is emphasized temporarily now the advantage used to be a small advantage about the european powers now, in connection with this pressure, one can feel the moscow the scenario of what happens in the meantime, if the europeans now withstand nato, i mean the european union separately, germany, france , great britain, mmm, this policy of restraining these aggressive appetites for provocations, as well as calls to stop escalation, serbia is not

russia, you understand germany, it should obey france more, it should obey great britain you understand, this is a slightly different caliber and here. actually, the europeans can and probably will break this situation, and then we have this hmm, so to speak, the weather vane will turn again more u the european side, when the europeans somehow have a common policy weighted not by threat , you understand, but in the meantime, with a firm policy , consistently and by policy, they will force the pro-russian forces to retreat a little there, and for belgrade, the higher political leadership, we think it will be successful for the president. this moscow scenario does not play out so that we'll see, but in the meantime, well

, in the meantime, with the european forces, maybe ok , well, let's move on to the answers to the questions, but we thank oleksandr levchenko, the diplomat , the highly authorized service to the republic croatia from 10-17 bosnia played the 11th and 17th years as well, that is, as usual in such cases, it has already become such a common place. russia can behave quite well at a tactical distance, but strategically it will lose. really strategically, it is not difficult to imagine an alliance of serbia with russia, where is russia, serbia, what are the interests of russia and serbia? well, maybe in terms of energy, but this europe already makes very little use of russia's energy

capabilities, the short situation is such that, at the strategic level, serbia will not, so to speak, be a pro-russian force in one way or another. closer to the perspective, but it is necessary to observe this and all of this. i am starting to answer tatyana 's questions. if people can't hear it, then it should be heard. i congratulate some experts in the field of energy infrastructure of ukraine, who believe that it is impractical to repair destroyed strategic energy objects during the missile attacks of the aggressor in ukraine, instead, despite of the difficult economic situation in the country

caused by the great war, they should be replaced by fundamentally new, modern, more efficient for the sustainable functioning of the energy supply system in the future. what is your opinion on this, because it is possible to finance such projects? is it possible only at the expense of international partners? but even in them, the funds are all calculated in advance as they say no, it's not all right mrs. tetyana tetyana the situation is very simple no one to repair anything but it will not be serious no one will repair during the war but you are not you will buy yourself a tv on the eve of the fact that you will know that the electricity will not work for a month and the tv simply cannot be turned on somewhere and for it to work, then the tv will not matter to you because it can be it can be so very so weak just simply renew the power supply to the

first point and renew now there are rumors going around, it is quite interesting that somehow the ukrainian energy scientists who should be given the nobel peace prize for the 22nd year because our peaceful life, apart from the military, depends on the energy scientists, they are coming up with something like that the schemes are fantastic, they work fantastically and they came up with something like that, if anyone noticed, someone was watching closely, the last various blackouts were overcome much faster than previous times, and these are some new schemes in which i do n’t understand anything, so at first you just need to learn how to recover quickly, then now probably energy they are engaged in this to understand that we need a post-war period , because the energy experts themselves already say that there is no point in restoring everything old, it is

semi-soviet, and it is necessary to replace this old semi-soviet with a new semi or as a whole european or american or japanese or whatever, i think no one will repair anything serious right now, everyone is waiting for the end of the war, when the rockets will not fly, then they will start replacing and restoring well, these are specialists, i don’t understand anything here, these are specialists galina good day how do you think why the west and the usa pursue such a restrained policy towards russia or do you think or do you think that this is not so? they vigorously introduce sanctions and so on. and i have complaints about western europe and europe and do not connect the states. i

definitely understand that the states lack something and in europe they cannot give everything and and and by the way, we are with you ms. galina we absolutely do not understand what we need, some specialist comes and tells us that 18 billion from the union and 50 from the united states are enough. and how much is needed? someone from the ukrainian government said that in order for it to function, we need here such and such already here such money here such and such money here and such i didn't have money, i didn't hear, i didn't hear, the zaluzhny just said and that's what he said so that i didn't understand him, he says that i need so many tanks, so many tanks for what, in order to keep in the north and keep in the south and keep in the east, that is, to have such and such a front of several thousand kilometers is it necessary for the tanks to break into the crimea, for example, should we

take back donetsk, we do not know this, these are delicate points for experts, we also do not know how many guns france has now, how many experts can give, some experts say now we took so much they will now be restoring their military potential in europe for years, but making ourselves feel offended is our national trait, we can always find a way to scat ay-ay-ay, we need it, they don’t give it to us, unfortunately, this is also a fact, that’s why i don’t, i just don’t see the possibility of being effective to receive this help well, okay, i will bring ff-16s, ukrainians don’t know how to fly at 16, they don’t know how to study for six months

, but former state secretary kissil already believes that the world should not allow the probable disintegration of russia in ukraine, it is necessary to help return the borders by february 24, well listen, oh, and mykola veresen thinks that he is more sober than the bones of oxygen for 100 years already. yes, and i, for example, believe that it is necessary not until february 24, but until the 14th of the year. zelenskyi's own zelenskyi has already made his opinion public, and nothing depends on a thousand , but everything depends on zelenskyi and zuluzhny, that's

why the conversation is irresponsible, it's irresponsible. that they met does not mean that putin and zelenskyi met in paris. so what? that's why all this is speculation of kissinger. there are only interests of the united states. he believes that it is in the interests of the united states to prevent the collapse of the russian federation. well, he thinks so, and biden thinks something else, so let them talk. freedom of speech exists oh my god, i have few questions and we will have a lot of time to thank mykola did you celebrate mykola in your childhood or were you friends with santa claus or do you prepare gifts for your loved ones on this holiday no i don't i'm not preparing any gifts. i'm waiting for gifts from

someone else because i'm nicholas, but in galicia, everyone, yes, everyone should give nicholas. we didn't celebrate saint nicholas. we didn't celebrate saint nicholas at all in kyiv. and we didn't have such galician and maybe volyn sentiments that were here. i know that they were always quite active and went to church and celebrated the 19th and malanka for the old new year and vasyl and so on and so on and so on, all this here somehow survived , but there in most of ukraine i think that it was not there and now it’s just renaissance i was even more surprised, moreover, i think that even after independence, the first years there were 91-92-93 somehow. also, if you told someone that we have mykolaiv, that is, people would be very surprised,

well, besides the fact that it was still running out of your head that this is all a certain time coincided with the birthday of stalin and brezhnev. well, somehow they always treated some religious and semi-religious celebrations more neatly. this is the very end of the second decade and the third decade of december. well, you have to be so careful. this is brezhnev stalin's birthday, not the day birth st. nicholas, so there is a huge number of problems here to give a gift. maybe he will give something, but for now i don't think about it. i have work there tomorrow. i have my own work. i have something to do, so i don't think i will have such a day off. where can i relax ? maybe

in the evening i'll go to the restaurants, maybe not, i don't know how it will go, you always have to think about how feelings have affected your worldview, the war is going on, you're taking the strength to live, smile and stay sane. thank you svetlana, because i'm not convinced that i'm on the road in a meadow and that i have a lot of strength but not at all it didn't matter, i was such an american before the war during the war, and my logic, my head told me that there would definitely be an attack by the russian federation, i argued with you people, but at the same time, i wouldn't believe it if you read like a-ah americans as the american establishment how did the white house react? they didn't believe it either, but they acted as if they believed. they tried to convince themselves that something bad

could happen. that's why i was almost the same. i was definitely among those. i think there were most of them. it was not enough. i think it was then many, many, i was all those who were convinced and now but now people like me and such words as i will say to myself i will say less and less and less people and more and more and more people will speak i from the first second knew or knew that we would win. i knew from the first second that it would be this way and that there would be a repulse near kyiv and that they would be near kharkiv and kherson. we will stand firm in donbas and there is a prospect of the return of crimea and everything, everyone knew everything except me, i think that i'm far in the future i will be the one who was afraid, who was convinced that kyiv would be taken, who was

convinced that there would be a bad, catastrophic situation for ukraine, i was convinced that maybe the ukrainian army exists, but at the level of ordinary soldiers, maybe at the level of junior officers who simply do not remember the soviet era and that's why they behave differently, but they were taught by those generals, i think who remember the soviet era well and taught the soviet way, i thought a lot, i didn't believe in the brutality of the russian army, i just didn't believe and when buch was retaken by such territories near kyiv it was a shock for me, i thought that we had already moved on from the middle ages,

but you see, we have not moved on from the middle ages, or rather they have not moved on from the middle ages, although you know at the very end of the 20th century that we talked with the ambassador and the ambassador and he said that he told well he is so touching that the first half of the 90s, the 90s passed and war after war raged when milosevic, the president of serbia, attacked absolutely everyone around him and simply killed thousands, absolutely genocide , thousands of people, and there was nothing else, thank god they were also there, but no longer in the thousands, but there relatively speaking in the tens of hundreds, but measuring people by deaths is the last thing, it seemed because i was commenting on it, we worked then and in italy, we worked for

windows to the world, by the way, there was also such a program kolya mykola knyazhytsky mykola leonidovych then he headed it's all he found money, the first independent post-soviet tv channel appeared, we all worked on it in the mid-90s, and that's exactly what was being described, the srebreni tragedy is when seven thousand people simply killed the men of all ethnic cleansing, and it seemed to me that i saw it with my own eyes on tv, i myself uttered these words about these tragedies while describing them , but for some reason i forgot about it and thought that it was already the 19th and 20th centuries, now 21 years ago i was caught up in this thoughtlessness that is, there is

no rational explanation why they started killing peaceful old people, my friends just sat in the basements in these parts for weeks and everything was flying right above them, what are you going to do with such russians? well, now it’s definitely better to understand and see it all you know, the 21st century, here we are looking at gadgets there t-sept. that is, we see enormous progress , and we see progress in many dimensions, including the humanitarian dimension, in such a simple plane, health, education, recreation, tourism acquire different, so to speak, different sides, people think about it trumpet about creation think about how we used to live

children will they drive a car that runs on gasoline or is it possible to fly somewhere or relax somewhere? well, in short, a huge number of creatures and the only person in the world and its citizens of this person, i would even say the arabs of this person is called putin, who wants to destroy on the contrary and we all think let's make an opera and let's make a new hotel and let's come up with it now we are seeing thermonuclear fusion, although we have begun to promote it the americans are already there somewhere, the galicians have some kind of success and otters of synthesis, this means that you can simply take energy from nothing, from the air, not at the level of the air, that the wind will turn uh windmills there, and at the level of the fact

that you take molecules, atoms, which when disintegrates occurs nuclear explosion explosion excuse the russianism, but even here scientists can come up with ways to direct and control this huge energy of the explosion in peaceful directions . it's just another world and europeans and americans, japanese, australians are working for this and one person sits and says, i won't let you do it, i'll let you do it i won't do it and it's very strange. well, maybe. such thoughts force me to be more optimistic, because i know that science will win, progress will win, the

sun will win, the day will win. this is my life, this is part of my profession, i really don't like the presenter, very journalists, who show what is happening here, you have to educate yourself and have that middle line and gloom and er, how should i say now , they will give me more questions, thank you and gaiety and life remain, you understand. i love life. i think that you, we are different from russians, that we ukrainians love the life of russians . why do they love today? well, maybe they have such a life. what is there to love when such a terrible life came to me? more questions comment. please tell me the story of the ukrainian gift for the main polish police department, which new explosion caused the hospitalization of the shimchuk generator, what was it and who could have

done it, but you don’t know mrs. raya, but you don’t know. they must have flown it in. i think they flew in from mars and something they did something there in poland tells me that you guess that the country behind the explosions begins with the letter r and ends with the letter y, and the president begins with the letter p and ends with the letter n. these are the kind of people who are behind any recent explosions in europe, before we thought it was muslim extremists, now we understand that they are russian extremists. well, what are you going to do ? the senate is going to officially appeal to the russian federation in the near future with a call to withdraw troops from ukraine and cover up the hostilities. do you think the declaration will have any significance ? and whether such an official statement was too late, galina stezhte

, please keep a close eye on the course of the news 150 and a half million times, the event of the eu, nato , together or directly indirectly through other er, other institutions turned to russia has decided to withdraw its troops from ukraine and stop hostilities, this is just one more time because, as i always explain, no one will wait for the measure to operate exclusively in one river. that's right, the driver. the war, let's stop the war. that's why it's always . it's absolutely, well, this position of the west will

always be like that. the cancellation of putin's annual address to the federal assembly and press conference is not for nothing. he is so afraid of journalists' questions, uh, which are tame. it's a short story because they make remarks to me that i don't articulate . putin canceled all the addresses before the new year to the federal assembly and the press conference. he canceled what this means, a million events can happen. well, first of all, no one should never think that there are no coincidences, yes, the questions are all tame, but if you imagine the picture, i think so, and his assistants explained to him that ivan ivanovych ivanov from tyumen lost everything yesterday to a journalist or his father or

someone else or his neighbor died and he knew about it he finds out, they write to him on the phone before the press conference itself and he says, what is this, what kind of war is this, and instead of the agreed question, he stands up and says, “when are you putin’s contagion, will you end the war, bitch, you are such a live broadcast, the problem is the second, and suddenly these ukrainians will hit somewhere with shells and i am telling you that we will win. everything will be fine , everything will be russia, and at this moment, somewhere, some kind of airfield, another explosion is a problem, that's why putin has a problem, big problems

. the new law on media returns ukraine to soviet times with state television and if television belongs to the state, then the state will engage in propaganda for its own money. what is your opinion about the law? mykola knyazhytskyi is right here, the question is not the same, the question is not the same, yes, television has the opportunity well, there is no public television. nowhere in the world in a civilized world, this is absolutely a step back, be civilized because there is public television, but then i am a special tax and people pay this tax and can demand it in this way then refuse to do balanced balanced programs here is still a financial problem now i will explain look we all pay taxes well i hope that everyone although experts say that

only half of ukraine pays taxes so they get into the national budget of the entire budget money goes to television or the budget yes that's it the cabinet of ministers will decide at the same time that you are now watching one or another screen, but at the same time there are people on television who pay for television. some have fewer channels, some pay more. some are social, some are more, but we all still pay if it’s a private channel like the one you ’re watching now. well, it’s not a state channel, let’s say yes, then it works at the expense of advertising

. television, and the second time advertising brings money. that is, all channels except the state one have one source of financing, and the state one has two honestly no dishonestly unfairly it can’t be like that then there are different ways very different how to maintain public in ukraine all these ways very complicated because we need a supervisory council. and who will get there, and there will be politicians on the ice council, and the politicians will pull the strings on themselves, well, in short, from a financial point of view, and from a political or socio-political point of view, this is a very complicated story. i never believed in the state

public television public television in ukraine and i still don't believe that's why i don't know, i would close the state ones, but i'm not convinced that it's possible to open public ones 20 first unfortunately, i won't be able to answer any more questions, but i hope they will remind me. my colleagues will answer all these questions. so good evening, thank you for your work , the news team is working on the most important thing in a few moments, this issue will start with the situation in kharkiv oblast