this story about water mains that were broken into the mains, which seemed to be restored, then they were broken. and the question is whether it is technical or not. well, first of all, about these 75 settlements . how much light water and how much this number changes during the day, because we know that the south of ukraine, well fortunately, in particular, mykolaiv oblast suffered as a result of the last missile attack and you will understand that the situation is not easy, please, i also know that in odesa, i really confirm that the situation is very difficult with electricity, i will say that in mykolaiv , mykolaiv oblast, mykolaiv has a schedule and the schedule is carried out in odesa with a schedule in general these days hmmm, but when it comes to technical water, it is true that on some days it is not even supplied at all, but it is separate according to the district of the city, some have it, some do not have it. that is, it is very, very difficult and for now, i would like to emphasize that today i was in the

city center and i can't see that many people go out to the city center today, that is, it is also not crowded, but there are a few people who do not have the opportunity to spend the winter somewhere else, and it is implied that this is necessary for the city a house in the village with a stove there, in relation to these 75 settlements, we were talking about them, in fact, many of them were completely de- energized and destroyed . gas, gas services and electric services could not leave. we also asked. then people turned to me. i asked the regional leadership. it was march, april, may and all these days to leave and fix people, that is.

people there in some settlements are recovering and slowly, where there is and the housing stock is more or less preserved, people are returning because, let's put it this way, today it will certainly be easier and more comfortable to survive the winter in a village where there is a stove and where there is firewood than in a city with high-rise buildings that's why we also understand this and we are preparing for all scenarios , and we would also like to determine what else - a session of the regional council was held this week. i am a deputy and i want to emphasize that we deserved the implementation of the regional budget, plus uah 77 million additional regional budget i received from the tax system under the personal tax thanks to the military wage plan , therefore the regional budget was fulfilled at the expense of those payments, but the other payments are the

income tax from large enterprises, of course, and there the rent payments were not fulfilled, but at the expense of this, the budget was fulfilled for us as well i raised the question because we didn't wait for someone else to raise, meaning vlad on the nile coalition, the question regarding the appeal to the verkhovna rada and the president of ukraine regarding the ban on the activities of the moscow patriarchate on the territory of the mykolaiv region and in ukraine, well, that is the amount of appeals , victoria, but suddenly you know what are the moods of people in the mykolaiv region in general, from what you know, uh, from this question , well, i will tell you the mood of people when i am on social networks raised the question that they did not support my appeal, people were very indignant, i will tell you, i did not even expect such support that people even in the villages. i know the villages where he is a deputy, that there are churches of the moscow patriarchate, but people are still in favor of their well, in the plan they translated

legally, to our local church, to our psu, that's why there was support for just this appeal, but i didn't even go for support. it's just my inner conviction. i understood that there could be criticism . uh, from the day the tomos appeared, and i just believe that the church should really be unified and then we won't have an understanding. then, uh, you understand why it turned out that way, because a lot of information about priests who worked precisely on the territory of the mykolaiv oblast is also on e- is a benefit on the territory of the kherson region in favor of the occupiers , this does not mean that we are against the priest, it is legally possible to do this by banning the statutes, closing the legal entities in it, and in this way these parishes

will legally transfer to our orthodox church of ukraine, thank you very much. i hope that this will find support at the session of the regional council, and all the parliamentary forces will decide unequivocally about that church, many representatives of which actually openly and many not openly supported the enemy who continues to wage an aggressive war against ukraine viktoriya moskalenko, a deputy of the mykolaiv regional council, was with us about the situation in the mykolaiv region about the situation in the city of mykolaiv well, also about these initiatives to ban ukrainians, what is the name of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate? in those documents that were found in various churches and in particular in the kivertsivka lavra, and also in vinnytsia they searched there in other regions of our state there were e-e documents with rpc seals, that is, here i somehow got out of my way and came up with something that doesn't exist. well, there's no way it will work. well, that's why the situation is like this. we are now bringing serhiy

shikun, the officers of the regional terror defense of the luhansk region, to the conversation. he is in touch with us, mr. serhiy. i congratulate you. i am glad to see and hear. glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, mr. serhiy, i would like to first of all, i would like to talk about the situation in the war zone in general, from what you can say in the direction where you continue to resist the good aggression together with your brothers and sisters that we currently have from luhansk region, please you know, i'll say more pants, is it on the luhansk border, it's uh, and to this day, as you always do, well, in the 9th month of the war, the people there are tired . mobilized, what kind of military personnel and so

that the artillery is working without respite well, we are pouring, we are working as uh, that is that in the territorial defense forces, everything is happening according to the order that we expel the muscovites from our land as soon as possible. i would like to ask already about this plot of matchmaking and crime or different from there, different information comes from there , again from what can be said. please tell me what are the prospects there, what is the current situation in this important area of ​​confrontation with the enemy, please, well, you know how i would not like to touch this plot because what are the functions of the headquarters and who set the tasks and this is the function of the military, then if we are going to tell how someone tells where, then three hundred and 200 of our guys will fly there, such people should be tried, tried for 25 years, so that it is less there, so that i

i will not say anything about this because there will be hostilities and i repeat the line of the point once again, we keep the volume of the muscovy, the volume is very strong. i would like to ask, uh, the commander-in -chief of the armed forces of ukraine, valery zaluzhny, said in an interview which weapons are needed by the ukrainian troops and he mentioned the large number of weapons that changed the situation in the war zone in general at the front, but if we are talking about luhansk region, are you missing today what would be necessary and what, in your opinion, could really help now because we and we have military aid and we are hoping for more military aid, let's say we are waiting for leopard tanks, for example, from germany, we are waiting for patriots from petriv, you understand, they are asking more for the protection of ukrainian cities and settlements, but if we talk about it, please, well, look at the territorial defense, it was designed to protect the city, it was massed. and now, like

all the armed forces, how did this affect the troops, we are engaged in assault actions and in our defense, and what we need, yes, luhansk is, well the armed forces need cars that must pass because it is raining again, it is thawing there again to 10°c, clothing is friendly, armor is the same, the same engines are boiling, er, the same. for the fact that in order to evacuate people, in order to evacuate people, we need equipment, we will need a large amount of equipment, we also need artillery, mortars and a large number, a large number of machine guns and everything else in the evening. and the fact that it passes to us from the west

it is not enough because the muscovites will push the steel with great forces. the sums of the large forces of these mobilized men and the equipment of the muscovites can be more. i want to ask another question: uh, a statement was made by the deputy minister of defense just a few days ago that the substitution of a-ah is possible. a new wave of mobilization then they said that it will be necessary then, if there is a need for it, you can certainly see the situation on the front, i will not say now what you will say for the entire front, what is happening there, what is the need , but do you see that fresh forces are needed but fresh forces of trained people and not just those who, well, who gathered someone, how does russia do it, they took away the machine gun, gave it and sent it to the front. the military and luhansk have not

decreased in the first uh, today, mobilization is going to our brigade, no one has to do it because he brought it slowly. take care serhiy shakun about the situation in luhansk oblast in the midst of the luhansk regional terror defense forces from what can be said. he told about what cannot be said correctly. he did what he didn't say. well, there will be more in just a few seconds. my colleague serhii zgurets will tell about the situation in a- and on the fronts, sergey. i congratulate you , serhiy yatsenko, and i congratulate our viewers. i have a question, whatever you ask serhiy sheik , the minister of murder of the russian federation, well , the official minister of defense, they call him the russian federation, he was checking the front lines defenses of the russian army but for some reason those with an arbitrary line of defense in them are in the city er-er perekop, this is actually already crimea, the border with crimea er-er, what has changed there, what kind of

defense is this, what are they preparing for, please well, actually, here is a nuance in to another, because it was actually announced that it was being checked by advanced positions there, but then when ukrainian educational intelligence agents analyzed data from open sources, they analyzed where exactly these advanced positions were, and actually something, you with the expression on your face, was in the trenches, that is in fact, 100,200 km from the front line, if the rashists consider this area to be the front line, it means that they have such a completely clear situation that where the enemy's defense line will pass in the near future. tell well, today's edition we will talk about the new york times investigation called putin's war in ukraine , the story of the disaster from the middle about how the russian army is forced to change its strategies on the battlefield and about whether there are really about 300 tanks to europe and the usa for ukraine about this in a

moment, literally yesterday, an extremely interesting investigation of the publication your time came out about putin's war in ukraine, the story of the disaster from the inside , it describes the main problems of the russian army in the first days of the invasion, there are many interesting new details, so everyone should read this the publication is extremely interesting, and it mentions why the enemy could not capture kyiv in 18 hours, including the fact that the enemy sent riot police at the head of the columns, which contradicts any military logic about that the tank regiments were tasked to cover as much as 400 km in 24 hours, which is completely unrealistic , and it even says that the usa tried to prevent ukraine from killing

the chief of the general staff of russia valery gerasimov during his visit to the war zone, the story there is that the americans found out that valery gerasimov was planning a trip on the front lines, but they hid this information from the ukrainians , fearing that an attempt on his life could lead to a war between the united states and russia, as the newspaper writes, however, the ukrainian side learned about this trip after internal debates washington asked for an extraordinary step , that is, by asking ukraine to stop the attack on the enemy's command posts, but the ukrainians said that actually we are already carrying out this attack and dozens of russians died during this attack, but general gerasimov was not among the dead at that time, although after that the russian warlords reduced their trips to the front and the story about this visit by gerasimo is interesting to me because actually gerasimo arrived in izum in

april of this year in order to lead the russian troops, at that time there were actually only two publications were the first to write about this information. it was defense express. and actually, the espresso channel . on the trio of these new details about the past miscalculations of the russian army, it is now quite revealing how the russian army is forced to change its strategies on the battlefield. as for me, the russian army has demonstrated in the last 10 months three ways of launching the war, the first blitzkrieg, which was preparing for completely wrong strategies in assessing the situation in ukraine, first of all, in terms of the scale of resistance from the ukrainian society and in terms of the quality of the defensive actions of our armed forces that biskrieg completely failed, then russia bet on a different combat model, let's remember the battle for donbass. the so-called great battle for

donbass, which was decorated by russia, where the russian federation and the russian army bet first of all on a shaft of fire, that is, on superiority in artillery. we saw the consequences of this tactic in combat action for severodonetsk lysychansk, where we managed to respond to 40,000 enemy shots with only 4,000 shots. because we already had a catastrophic lack of artillery and ammunition, but this advantage the enemy was reduced when we began to receive american howitzers when we began to receive ammunition and actually began to hold himex and mls which completely changed the history and dynamics of hostilities because we actually began to destroy all russian stocks and now the enemy has to haul their shells at a distance of up to 100 km because closer to them this region is dangerous and it really turned out to be the dynamic of the fireball

that russia implemented earlier. and now we are now seeing the third adaptation of russia in the conduct of hostilities, what does it consist of, this is actually an increase in the number of personnel involved in the conduct of hostilities on the front line, this is an attempt to recover losses, achieve stabilization of the front line, and even try to carry out offensive actions at the expense of an additional number of manpower precisely at the expense of mobilization. so now we are on the battlefield, we will face for some time this third paradigm of waging war on the part of russia at the expense of a significant number of poorly trained personnel, will this model of war effectively and i think that only for a certain time, because the systemic problems of the russian army have not

disappeared . perspective, which is actually a reason for special attention from the military and political leadership of ukraine and the definition of their own plans in response to enemy intentions , now we have viktor kyvlyulyuk , a reserve colonel and an expert of the defense center, on the phone of strategy, mr. viktor, i welcome you to the espresso channel, if you can see and hear me now, good evening, i hear, i see well. commander-in-chief valery za luzhnyi and commander of the ground forces alexander the syrian, and in fact there are such summaries of the material where they claim that

actually all three emphasize that the outcome of the war depends on the next few months and they are all convinced that russia is preparing the next major offensive or offensives that may take place, they say that in january at the most in march . from the parties has unleashed a war of aggression against our country and must achieve its military and political goals, it cannot achieve this by conducting defensive operations. it is clearly done, therefore, the third attempt that moscow is taking. it must be resolved by carrying out an offensive from which directions eh where will they move so far it is

quite difficult to say the only thing that is absolutely clear without the capture of kyiv and the establishment of a puppet regime there, which will make all the necessary decisions for moscow, the kremlin is unable to achieve its goals, what is the basis of the conclusions of our military - of the political leadership about what will happen well, first of all, for this. history says that moscow spent the last four hundred years precisely to destroy ukrainian statehood , the mention of ukraine as a whole, the project of us here they are not doing anything new in this regard, now the processes of partial mobilization are taking place, which formally ended, are actually continuing with and at the moment, accordingly, a so-called regional grouping is being formed on the territory of belarus, somewhere undergoing training

at the training grounds of the russian federation , citizens called to be partially mobilized, the so-called chmo the enemy is increasing activity in the eastern direction, trying to take control of the bachmouth in some areas, we observe that the construction of defensive lines is taking place but advancing based on the defensive line is much easier than relying on the newly created operational structure, therefore, the military and political leadership of ukraine makes the right conclusions by orienting the state, the population, and the army to the fact that in the next 60-90 days we should expect aggressive offensive actions on the part of our enemy but at the same time, you mentioned the mobilization and, in fact, depending on it, it also says about the mobilization of the enemy that it gave certain results, which is actually confirmed by the cheese, as often as it tells about

features of the enemy's actions between the matchmaker and the flint but in any case it is mentioned that 200,000 russian mobilized troops are being prepared somewhere, this is the question: where, somewhere behind the urals, are 200,000 being prepared, is it, let's say so , in the language formula, is it really some estimates that say that the russians there are secret bases where it is possible to train such a large number of soldiers because we know that the carrying capacity of russian training grounds is limited. none of us have such opportunities. none of us , not once, not alone. well, it seems to me that this is more a figure of speech than a real reality

. of people , this regional group appeared for a reason, this is an attempt to attract the belarusian educational and material base, all four training grounds where the units of the motorized rifle division of the russian federation are trained, respectively, about 200,000 the language can be entered, but where are those 100,000 divided? these are probably field camps, these are probably points of permanent deployment, these are probably military towns released from previous years, which today are hardly adapted to the residence of such a large number of people, to say that they are undergoing training , it is very doubtful that they are not there, where they are not from whom to learn. they have the most primitive equipment, the cheapest, which was stored in warehouses even in soviet times, with the aim of deploying

multi-million armed forces that should move in the direction of the lamasha, so far they are moving in the direction of bakhmut and it’s not very good for me, it’s not working out, viktor, today you have prepared such an interesting publication on the resource defect express, which assesses the capabilities of the countries of europe and the united states to ensure the wishes of the ukrainian army when it comes to 300 tanks and 700 bmp and 500 art systems in your conclusion is so critical that in fact it is possible to better these weapons, if they exist, the ukrainian army will receive them . well, in certain distant perspectives. say what we can have when, after all, there is no information about the fact that we will enter into appropriate negotiations with our partners. well, i have not come across such messages. the contact group that

works in the rammstein format certainly received appropriate wishes, but the problem is that after the vienna agreement was signed and pies of documents that limited the conventional armed forces on the territory of europe, all the armed forces began to be reduced, reformatted, the bet was placed on immediate response units in order to eliminate the crisis at an early stage, respectively surplus weapons were taken into reserve and sold off, and what is now in the armed forces in europe is the minimum necessary to ensure the security of these countries, not ours , so we can count on the fact that someone will be able to promptly take it from their armed forces. this is for us. well, it is unlikely that this is possible, and

it will not happen. what is stored on one base in the arsenals can certainly be transferred to us. first of all, it must be brought into proper technical condition. modernized because tanks that were put into storage in 1990 and a tank that was produced at the plant in 2020 are machines of completely different generations. produces for the german cheetah a swiss eagle, eh, switzerland did not agree to the transfer, and accordingly, we have a choice to collect the remains of the ammunition was the bundeswehr, or to negotiate with brazil half a world away, to drag them here, but i saw the information that the german company rai metal bought a factory in switzerland specifically for the purpose of

providing the ukrainian cheetahs with ammunition, that is, there are such non-typical standard solutions, but they are all the result of a very complicated negotiation process, do we have only negotiators or is the department of international military cooperation ready, which uh the ministry of defense has all this to ensure. i am not ready to answer, because the fact that critical imports are a huge problem was known as early as 2010. it seems to me that from now on radical improvements have not taken place, it is difficult, but we have to count on it, well, that is, when valery the hostage says the following phrase that it is important to preserve existing reserves for new and not for current battles, then this indicates that actually now our active actions are in a certain way limited by the number reserves and

it is because of this that we approach the planning of certain offensive or counter-offensive operations quite rationally and thriftily. this is how it turns out. carve out this reserve means abandoning the plans to return part of the ukrainian territory somewhere, therefore the commander behaves accordingly, but when i mentioned the universimes publication, there was such a phrase that actually putin, when there was talk of possible expected losses, it was said that the russians tried to convey information to joe biden about the fact that if there are 300,000 killed or more, it will in no way affect russia's position regarding the conduct and further hostilities, are the indicators of 300,000 killed?

we can talk about the fact that we need to find options so that these indicators are much higher, after all, to provide some kind of feeling of the pain threshold of the russian army of the russian federation, so that after all these losses are felt by the russian society, unfortunately, we will not be able to do this, first of all, the totalitarian right what is the russian federation like today? it is not sensitive to losses, to pain , to despair. one of the red leaders once said, one death is a tragedy of a million statistics. they live in all paradigms , no matter how many people die, they will be proud. it is an empire to have a wooden school with a toilet on the street and to launch half a billion dollars worth of rockets on the territory of ukraine every day and to be proud of the fact that we have no electricity for 6 hours, so i would not count on it. and then why should we count on changes in the approaches of umonko or our partners in order to switch from these linear

weapons systems to tanks and bmps to more high-tech solutions that provide a more effective impression of the enemy at long range because what british defense minister ben wallace was talking about when he said that we are ready to provide ukraine with long-range systems, i think that the question here is not you, but in their other solutions, which can really increase the effectiveness of our defense policy and counteroffensive actions, and thanks to the efforts of mr. voice and the ukrainian lobby in the british parliament, we received beam missiles stone we got a lot more that uh greatly increased our long-range new strike capability uh before we started the active phase of offensive operations i think it would be right to ah