in ukraine, after all, there are three ways to change the rhetoric and actually give a signal about the possibility of peace talks, but what are peace talks from the point of view of the russian federation, let's put aside the illusions, the prayer for territorial concessions on the part of ukraine is not accidental , but the president's tough and clear position regarding the fact that there will be no territorial concessions, and the only language of possible peace negotiations is access to the borders of 1991. well, there is no place for ukraine here, there is simply no room for maneuver at all, because, just like russia, it cannot agree to anything, because anything will be simply interpreted as her weakness, and her defeat is so absolutely certain and likewise ukraine has nowhere to retreat. therefore, these negotiations are simply impossible in fact, but what concerns the continuation of the military military operations, i wanted to ask

you about iranian missiles because we already understand that both sides have nowhere to retreat and must continue to do what they are doing, russia attack ukraine defend and counterattack and so it turns out that this is a war of attrition and will win the one who has enough resources to reach the goal. so, russia has received, it has already been confirmed by the representative of the white house, john kerry, that russia agreed in the morning to receive such ballistic missiles, how dangerous are they for ukraine, for our anti-missile system the defense of which it is as of now without patriot systems and whether we will be able to withstand these new attacks already by iranian ballistic missiles, what is their special feature, you know, let's wait for the actual official information about the transfer of the iranian side by the way, the pentagon is less , however, there is less information, there will be information about the

western partners, so i’m his kirby. i would like to note that until now, the pentagon has twice officially denied the possibility of the transfer of ballistic missiles by the iranian side, praying for ballistic missiles with a range of 3,800 km this is a serious weapon, taking into account that ukraine does not have its own systems that could be countered by ballistic energy, well, it is not a supersonic weapon, but less so, the ballistics itself, that is, the trajectory , that is, the missile rises up and inflicts attack on the ukrainian side, there are no systems that would actually cover ukrainian strategic objects from the impact of ballistic missiles, this is precisely what is connected with, say, the diplomatic activity and the statements of the ukrainian president regarding the provision of petri systems to the system of the patriarchate , information game on the one hand, we hear about what iran supplies will supply russia with

ballistic missiles, but in contrast to this and at approximately the same level, we hear about the possible transfer of patriot systems to ukraine, and this will protect protect absolutely mr. yevgeny quite rightly noted the absolutely diplomatic game, because let's remember with you the statements of moscow, quite nervous about the possibility of transferring the petri systems to ukraine, and the harsh statement of the pentagon, however, how moscow will not indicate which weapons to transfer. about the transfer of ballistic missiles to the wounded echoes with the pentagon's statements about the possibility of the transfer of petriv to the ukrainians, that is, this is the so-called mirror response, the pentagon clearly stated we have information about the transfer, so the next step - this will actually be from the transfer of the patriot systems. all

claims of moscow regarding the supply are not automatically removed, that is, a signal is given or there are no early morning missiles or, accordingly, the question is the peculiarity and such frank politicization of these complexes , petre, they are actually complexes of the 90s , comparing them there with soviet complexes s300, approximately according to its characteristics, in ukraine, more modern complexes are provided by them, well, in general. the military is unique and more so than here the politicians of the globalist missiles can work with a target detection range of 180 km , a range of damage from 8-10 km, an altitude of up to 20 km, despite the fact that the first ones used during the persian gulf war were actually made by petriv, they are constantly being upgraded on the radio, the patriot missile can

shoot down the target directly and not blow up without, well, direct proximity to the missile. therefore, these are state-of-the-art complexes, why are the russians so afraid of them, because then the chances of so -called missile terror will be minimal regarding the politicization of this issue , russia hints that at the time of the delivery of the patriots, it recognized the united states as a party and a participant in the conflict, moreover, moscow's statements regarding the fact that the patriot systems will become legitimate targets are the same as the diplomatic game surrounding the delivery of these patriot systems and statements about the possibility i emphasize the possibility of supplying iran with ballistic missiles, while there is no 100% information about the fact of transfer, there is information about possible agreements, these are different things, let's say, let's not rush

in advance, you asked the question how russia bypasses sanctions and renews its fleet of cruise missiles. unfortunately, again, according to the data of the western intelligence of the russian federation, it was possible to accumulate a significant number of microforks that are used for the glanaz guidance system itself. well, you know, mr. yevhen a bit of humor in the evening program. it was a surprise for me to imagine that the washing machines that were stolen from ukraine are russia, after all, they were stolen in order to use microchips. therefore, it was not the initiative of the russian occupiers at the grassroots level turns out to be a well-planned operation by the russian side, and this is not a joke, sorry , you know, we will defuse the situation a little, but it is less, but it turns out that if the ukrainian washing machines are already at the service of the russian army, i have not heard about the stolen washing machines but about the fact that russia has increased the import of such

equipment. that is, you use unfortunately, it is worth mentioning that another supply channel is a third country, and actually, well, let's say that it came into contact with the west, that is , the so-called gray e-e schemes are used when these microchips are actually delivered through the laying companies through third countries, yes. this makes the process more expensive, complicates logistics, but solves the issue of resuming the production of cruise missiles. unfortunately, you mentioned that the issue of petri systems will actually involve the united of the united states of america in the war that is currently taking place on the territory of ukraine, but i want to remind you that they said the same thing about the hymars. nevertheless, the hymars are successfully fighting in ukraine and there is no war with the united states it started, despite all these statements, so why is the

situation with the patriots more serious, why is the usa paying more attention to the possible danger of escalation, despite the fact that everything was successful with hamas in the past, the same blackmail from russia did not achieve its goal, why are such things happening now oscillations you know let's let's look at the other let's give the united states mr. eugene already mentioned that the owner of the united states is supplied with a system of sharp the most modern first of all let's look unfortunately at the german a ours and ours from the american e and the common nor american so here is the statement of the united states that they are currently negotiating with the countries of the middle east, which have unarmed systems, we are already ready to transfer them to ukraine and there the so -called carousel option is working, that is, the country of the middle east in the east, these instructions are transferred to ukraine , respectively, they receive from the united states

already ready ones that will be produced during the 23rd-24th years, and at the same time the topic of the same petri is raised. that is, i do not exclude mr. evgeny, once again, the transfer of a higher-quality air defense system - we are talking about the same irises, under the guise of conversations about the possibility of transferring the system , the fact that these systems are a component of the anti-missile defense system of the united states, which was deployed in europe in the early 2000s , plays an important role years and actually caused a new wave of this cold, yes, that transfer to ukraine will allow in the near future to include ukraine in the so-called nuclear umbrella that the united states together with other nato countries in europe, they covered over the partner countries, that is, when ukraine becomes patriots

, they can not only work against the russian missiles that will attack ukraine, but they may be able to join the global closing of the sky over ukraine at some point, we are standing too long and this war will come to that yes, we see that it is moving, well , in fact, there is some kind of model for increasing the level of weapons supply to ukraine. yes, there is some kind of road map . at some point the world will say and you asked a lot for a very long time, we made a decision to drink the sky over ukraine and for that it is decided technically uh, for this you don’t even need any additional equipment and it seems to me that russia is afraid of exactly what putin keeps saying about the fact that the inclusion of ukraine or other countries of eastern europe in the nato countries

or in the program about it reduces the approach of the rocket to moscow there to 5-7 minutes, but here we are not talking about offensive types of weapons, but about the protection of the ukrainian sky and when you started with that putin is trying to push the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons against ukraine in the world, and the appearance of the petrists in ukraine will make it impossible to use or make it completely ineffective. it is about the fact that ukraine will cover not only the airspace above its state but, accordingly, its flanks. let's take a look at other optimistic statements that slipped by but did not attract mass attention, despite all the statements that the

united states is currently blocking the provision of systems to us with a range of up to 300 km, as well as a statement by the boeing corporation about the possibility of delivering ukraine a range of up to 150 km agree, if we take the tactical and technical characteristics of the heimers already mentioned by you, 85 km, and here 150 is twice as much as what you say, yevgeny, they gradually asked for it, first there were body armor, then m37 barrel artillery, then heimers, finally means of destruction with a range of up to 150 km, everything is done by the way, he talked about it, and in this interview, there is a dash of the article about valeriy of the zuluzh edition for the icon of the city. i got bored with english in russian instead of ukrainian. we understand very well that of course

this article was intended, well, primarily for a western audience, that is why it appeared with such and not in the mirror of the week or in ukrainian pravda, but on the other hand, what is said there what an alkaline, in addition to the fact that everyone was frightened by his prediction regarding a possible offensive by the russians , well, here many military experts have already spoken about the fact that this is, so to speak, the worst-case scenario for which the military should really prepare, but this does not mean that this is the only scenario without an alternative to that well, let's leave it for now, let's talk about it, and we just wanted to ask about the resource part of this article, where zulazhny simply says in direct text, i'm not asking you for f16, but at least there are not enough shells. even the commander of the combined command of the south andriy kovalchuk says that our offensive in the kherson region was

only 50-60% successful. precisely because of the lack of projectiles, it is trivial why in russia, despite the fact that they did not count on the number of projectiles from the very beginning, there are still enough of them, the whole world cannot collect a sufficient number of projectiles for ukraine in order to give a decent rebuff to the enemy. well, let's start with the article on the law of money, they said well, the same article is clearly indicated after zelenskyi's comments the interesting e-e is about the fact that once again there is a hint about crimea, ukraine should, as it were, hint at the impossibility of deoccupying crimea, but not give up for a while, that is, again, he is trying to promote this trip of the day to us, even those articles. leading western changes, but less, however, what concerns the signal, let's

see, the defense budget of ukraine is one trillion, well, a little, well, 4 billion dollars, to be clear, the defense budget of the occupying country has increased several times according to estimates of british specialists 142 billion imagine if we can stand up to the occupying country on an equal footing probably not the prepared mobilization reserve of the russian federation is 2 million with a total mobilization reserve of more than 10 million it is no coincidence that the president of ukraine in this article says that we need a permanent and expanded nature of military technically, ukraine can not cope on its own, let's remember the intensity of russian fire at the beginning of the military campaign, 60-70 thousand shells per day, but now in the direction of bakhmut, $20,000. 20 000, the intensity of fire is more than during the years of the

second world war, it is worth talking about it, and ukraine, unfortunately, faced the fact that there are no burning cartridges of the soviet caliber 122-152 mm due to their undermining of warehouses. by the way, we should finally receive clear information about those events, mr. yevgena, as far as i'm concerned. when we were told that these explosions at artillery depots in ukraine are all the hands of the kremlin, it's all done by russia. to write it off or something and here it turns out that no, this is the end, so that we understand, more was destroyed in warehouses than was released during all the years of the anti-terrorist operation. just imagine why the world has not found so many stocks of artillery

shells and such simple, primitive weapons populated at the moment which would help us to create a certain parity in artillery confrontations, the resources of which are exhausted faster , ours, together with the whole world, or the russians, who , no matter how old they are, but they still find something to cover our positions the fact is that the russian federation has the possibility of restoring even ordinary types of weapons, including artillery shells, its infrastructure is working, and it is working, well, at such an emergency pace, it is worth saying that the countries of the west were not ready after the actual fall of berlin, that such military conflicts will actually arise, the intensity of which will resemble the years of the second world war. let's take a look at the actual defense budgets of the leading countries of the west. a maximum of 2% of gdp was allocated, do you

remember the previous administration of president trump demanded from european countries an increase in defense budgets equal to five percent because they clearly told the united states that they cannot shoulder the entire burden of military support not only for their country but also corresponding to the leading european countries, then the entry was perceived as pressure from the united states, but a clear signal was given, but this is about the fact that, unfortunately, the countries of the west, i emphasize once again, were not ready for such intense and conflict with such use of actual projectiles and, accordingly, conventional weapons, and it is not by chance that i will finish, sir , you know that the owner of the commercial solution rammstein came to the deconservation of factories for the production of soviet-style projectiles czech republic , bulgaria, poland 152 mm, yes, because ukraine

actually needs a means of defeating the artillery barrel for 70 % unfortunately, it is still of the soviet model, but if the factories are opened, then your question. dollars of the defense budget of the russian federation, the defense budget of the united states is about 900,875, it seems that these numbers are not comparable, moreover, a large part of this money will be directed precisely to resisting russian aggression, it is not a coincidence that the united states itself stated that after the withdrawal from afghanistan, the united states will not allow more such things let's say so - well, sentenky regarding the weakening of his external political positions, and the prayer is that we move into a full format

of confrontation and confrontation of resources, the number of weapons, financial confrontation globally, on the world players of russia against the united states of ukraine, the eu countries, and here the issue of speed, the ability to produce possible economies will play a major role. that in soviet times , all these enterprises that were located beyond the urals, that manufacture weapons since the second world war, mr. yevgeny, were preserved for all enterprises, western equipment technologies are also necessary for in all these enterprises, they are of western production, respectively, after the 14th year, western corporations imposed restrictions on the supply of appropriate weapons, therefore the actual production of 152 mm projectiles was

significantly reduced . in the world, primarily the united states, we have much more than the russian federation, so i am convinced that the issue of deconserving the activities of factories , adjusting the production of the same of artillery shells, a loan is needed, it's literally a matter of a few months, and it 's no coincidence that bulgaria's own naval base has increased its, let's say, earnings in general. well, export positions have tripled in 9 months, all these factors that you both mentioned speak of that it may be much longer than we actually expected and all these optimistic forecasts that in the spring we can already reach the borders of 1991, they actually look like this now, well, a little

more optimistic than uh no no no no i would like to ask you how you feel about the forecasts that are currently being made. literally today, i heard the opinion of roman svitan, a well-known military analyst, pilot , colonel of the armed forces of ukraine, who said that if ukraine really does not reach the border by the spring of 1991, then this conflict can drag on for many years, that is, it can continue for 10 years, but in such a rather hot state, sometimes one side or the other side of the border talks, but at the same time , nothing fundamental is resolved, that is, the war does not end. do you agree with with such predictions that it can last for so many years, and i explain why my colleagues should talk about the fact that in nine months of war, the armed forces of ukraine, which occupied more than 40% of their own territory

, returned it. moreover, let's recall the same interview for the economist, where zaluzhnoi says that the syrian one, by the way, that there are several surprises being prepared for the occupiers, i do not exclude the actual possibility of conducting an operation both in zaporizhzhia and, accordingly, in luhansk directions, all the more so because of the operational and strategic initiative acquired by the armed forces of ukraine, and this will again talk about the accelerated nature of deoccupation. we return to what we said again, let's remember that once again the western mass media say that at the moment of the occupation of crimea , ukraine may face, let's say , tough opposition from the

russian federation, including the so-called of the nuclear scenario, that is, this issue before the occupation of crimea will be a rubicon. in your opinion, this thesis that putin is really ready for the loss of human resources in the range of 300,000 to a million russians, to what extent do they correspond to reality? it is not even putin who will decide what level of loss is permissible here, well, the people themselves, the residents of russia, should decide this limit, it is quite a ghostly number of executions for which there is an internal confrontation in russia or putin's readiness to withdraw to the borders with in 1991 and the signing of some kind of peace, is there a limit at all? i don’t have it in my hand. i never counted the number among my own military personnel, because these figures are three

and a million. that’s all. let’s not count. it’s necessary to read the statistics with pleasure . soon i will not be 100. 000, but let's say that this statistic, unfortunately, is not on the table, it is painfully on the table for putin, but there is no reaction to which we expect, moreover, let's talk about the fact that the number of dead is exactly regular units the forces of the russian federation are currently being compensated by the mobilization of the so-called special contingent, i.e. they found a way out, the victims will be among the convicts, it is not by chance that 23,000 have been released from russian prisons in two months, for comparison, the most active is in the russian federation for the 70th anniversary of the victory , 15,000 pnev, please tell me this 23,000 would be thrown to the front lines, who would have to

bear the brunt of the losses among personnel, and these losses would not be noticeable to russian society, but considering that in russia 400 000 places of deprivation of liberty, then we are talking about some second stage of partial mobilization, which scares us again at least as in my opinion , this is a little, well, too much, we have literally two minutes left. with lukashenko and with the ministers of defense, well, at least they announced such plans. and we still don't know what happened there, but what do you think this meeting was for, so that putin got out of his bunker and flew to belarus and personally met with lukashenka for what? what could it be? well, will he be persuaded again to attack ukraine? what he obviously does not want to do is to become belarus

, the very trigger for the outbreak of war outside the borders of ukraine. uh, let's actually consider this . what is the element of military-political pressure, first of all, both on ukraine and, as it were, on western partners, a signal is given that we are ready to actually expand the front at the expense of the belarusian direction. but is this true, well, let's extrapolate the events of february on the 22nd of the year, on the eve of the invasion, western intelligence provided information about the concentration of russian troops on the borders with ukraine, on the other hand, the current clear statements of the biden administration and american intelligence have no reason to talk about a possible belarusian direction; moreover , only 9,000 personnel are seen concentrated on the territory of the republic of belarus of the armed forces of the russian federation, this is not an invasion contingent, what can be agreed upon by the related e-e in the belarusian army,

approximately 1300 t-72 tanks, agree if the russian federation is currently deconserving tanks t-62 t64 these are the years of production of the totet 72, which is the main one in the armed forces of the russian federation, this will be the basis of these negotiations, i.e. the transfer of military equipment of the armed forces of the republic of belarus for the needs of the russian federation, that is where the shells , tanks and other weapons will be taken from the main ones and ukrainians should not be afraid, the belarusian direction is reliably under cover, you should not be afraid, but you want peace, prepare for war, not everyone hoped that 2022 would be peaceful. it turned out to be a military one, but what will the next one be like year, frankly, no one knows, we can only remember, analyze and make some predictions. but uh, we want peace, but we are ready for uh, that the war will continue until the complete victory of ukraine with you, it was a night and

worth it, maria vasilievna, i'm yevgeny plinskyi, dmytro snyiryov was a guest of ours see you on the air of faith and in yourself and in the armed forces of ukraine, the era of nivroku, the times of customs clearance, and for now, keep yourself in a handful through the darkness, it is more visible in the time when the destruction of people is the brightest, let's hold on, the hell is not easy and it is not tiring to hold on to the island fatal mistakes rains are harsh in the flow in the resource we follow the device keep minsk , the generators are humming to him in a thousand dreams we hold on to the truth we hold on to the stream

war does not look at all like in the movies, but a dirty, cold and terrible war smells like blood, war leaves its mark on everyone who has been there there, remember this when you see a person in a military uniform. this is what war looks like. her eyes are like that. remember the price. our heroes pay every day. we respect them. we thank them. we help them and we will definitely win. thanks to them .