this is the representative of the white house, john kerry, that russia agreed in the morning on receiving iranian holistic missiles, how dangerous they are for ukraine, for our anti- missile defense system, which is currently without patriot systems, and whether we can withstand these new attacks by iranian ballistic missiles missiles, what is their special feature of the main team, let's wait for the actual official information about the transfer from the iranian side. by the way, the pentagon, eh. less information, however, will mean information from the west partners for his kirby i would like to note that until what time the pentagon twice officially denied the possibility of the transfer of ballistic missiles by the iranian side, prays for political missiles with a range of 3,800 km. this is a serious weapon, taking into account the fact that ukraine does not have its own systems that could withstand ballistic missiles the second is,

well, it is not a supersonic weapon, but less so , the ballistics itself, that is, the trajectory of the flight , the missile rises up and strikes the ukrainian side, there are no systems that would cover the actual ukrainian strategic objects from the impact of ballistic missiles, this is precisely what is connected with, for example, the diplomatic activity and the statements of the ukrainian president regarding the provision of petriv systems, the patriot system, such an information game, on the one hand, we hear that iran supplies and will supply russia with ballistic missiles, but on the contrary, and at about the same level. we hear about the possible transfer of patriot systems to ukraine, and this is absolutely to be defended, mr. yevgeny quite rightly noted the absolutely diplomatic game, because let's remember with you moscow's statements are quite nervous about the possibility of transferring the petri systems to ukraine and

the pentagon's harsh statement that moscow will not indicate what weapons to transfer to us. and here is to note that kirby's statement has been echoed for almost a while. the transfer to the ukrainians of petriv, that is, this is the so-called mirror response, the pentagon clearly stated we have information about the transfer, so the next step will actually be the transfer of the patriot systems and all moscow's claims regarding the supply of non-supply is removed automatically, that is, a signal is given or there is no rocket launcher or, accordingly, the question is a feature and such frank politicization of these complexes, petre, they are actually complexes of the 90s, comparing them there with the soviet s300 complexes, approximately according to their certain characteristics, in ukraine they provide a more modern iris t they a-ah well

in general this is a new development, a new concept and they are in ukraine, they are working, but around petriv there was such a thing and more than that, the policies of globalist missiles can to work, the target detection range is 180 km , the damage range is from 8-10 km, the height is up to 20 km, despite the fact that the first ones used during the persian gulf war were actually made by petriv, they are constantly being modernized, at the moment the patriot missile can shoot down the target directly and not explode without, well, immediate proximity from missiles . therefore, these are state-of-the-art complexes, why are russians so afraid of them, because then the chances of so-called missile terror will be minimal, and regarding the politicization of this issue, respectively, russia hints that at the time of delivery patriot, whether or not she recognized the united states as a party

and a participant in the conflict, moreover, moscow’s statements regarding the fact that the patriot systems will become legitimate targets are therefore the diplomatic game surrounding the supply of these patriot systems and statements about the possibility. i emphasize the possibility of supplying iranian ballistic missiles while the information is one hundred percent regarding the fact of the transfer, there is no information about possible agreements - these are different things, let's say so, let's not get ahead of ourselves, as for the question you asked how russia circumvents sanctions and renews fleet of cruise missiles. unfortunately, again, according to the data of the western intelligence of the russian federation , before the start of the military intervention, it was possible to accumulate a significant number of micro- caps that are used for its own

glonass guidance system. who stole from ukraine, it was the russians who stole to use microchips. therefore, it was not the initiative of the russian occupiers at the grassroots level, it turns out that it was a clearly planned operation on the russian side, this is not a joke, it is not a pity, you know, we will defuse the situation a little, but it turns out that ukrainian washing machines are already at the service of the russian army. only in order to use unfortunately, it is worth mentioning that one more supply channel is a third country rather than actually .

this makes the process more expensive, complicates logistics, but solves the issue of resuming the production of cruise missiles. unfortunately, you mentioned the fact that the russians claim that the alleged use of patriot systems will actually be a draw from the united states america in the war that is currently taking place on the territory of ukraine, but i want to remind you that they said the same thing about the high martians. nevertheless, the high martians are successfully fighting in ukraine and no the war with the united states has not started, despite all these statements. so, why is the situation with the patriots more serious, why is the usa paying more attention to the possible danger of escalation , despite the fact that everything was successful with hamas in the past, the same blackmail from russia did not achieve its goal why are there such fluctuations now? you know. let 's look at the rest of the united states

. mr. yevhen already mentioned that the united states itself is supplied with a system of sharp, most modern, first of all, let's look at the pity. in germany and ours and ours with the american so common norwegian american so here is the statement of the united states that they are currently negotiating with the countries of the middle east that have unarmed systems we are already ready to transfer them to ukraine and there the so-called carousel option works, i.e. countries of the middle east transfer prices for the whole of ukraine, respectively, they receive from the united states already ready products that will be produced during the 23-24 years, and at the same time the topic of the same petri is raised. that is i do not rule out, mr. yevgeny, the transfer of a higher-quality air defense system again - we are talking about the same irises under the guise of talks about the possibility of transferring the system, and the fact that these

systems are a component of the anti- missile defense system of the united states, which ... were deployed in europe in the early 2000s and actually caused a new wave of this cold war. yes, and it is precisely the transfer of petriv in ukraine that will allow ukraine to be included in the so -called nuclear umbrella of the united states in the foreseeable future the states, together with other nato countries in europe, covered the partner countries, that is, when the patriots stand in ukraine, they can not only work against the russian missiles that will attack ukraine, but they may be able to join the global closing of the sky over ukraine at some point. yes, this war will come to that, yes, we see that it is moving, well, in fact, there is some model of increasing the level of weapons supply to ukraine, yes, from the road map, we moved

from body armor, helmets, javelins, we have already reached to the hymars, we are already talking about the patriots and at some point the world will say and you have been asking for a lot for a long time, we have made a decision to close the sky over ukraine and for this it is decided technically this is exactly what putin is afraid of, what putin is constantly saying about the fact that ukraine or other eastern european countries joining nato or participating in the pro program will reduce the flight time of e-e rockets to moscow there to 5-7 minutes, but we are not talking about offensive types of weapons a about the protection of the ukrainian sky, but what did you start with, that putin is trying to push the world into the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons against ukraine, and the appearance of the petrites in ukraine will make it impossible or make it completely ineffective

. let's talk about the fact that the petr system will be integrated in the general system of nato countries, that is, it means that in fact ukraine will cover not only the airspace above its state, but , accordingly, the flanks of minato and romania itself, poland and in other countries, mr. yevgeny constantly conducts yes, but let's take a look at other optimistic statements that slipped through the cracks but did not attract mass attention, despite all the statements, the united states is also currently blocking us from providing systems and impressions with a range of up to 300 km. boeing corporation's statement about the possibility of transferring property to ukraine and striking with a range of up to 150 km, agree , if we take the tactical and technical characteristics of the 85 km already mentioned by the heimers, and here 150 is twice as much, what you say, sir, is not gradual, you asked at first there were

bulletproof vests, then m3 women, barrel artillery, then hymers, finally, means of destruction with a range of up to 150 km. this is being done gradually, but it was also said in this interview, the dash of the article, eh, about valery of the zuluzh edition, where with icons, we perfectly understand eh, we perfectly understand what eh i got bored with english in russian instead of ukrainian. we understand very well that this article was, of course, intended primarily for a western audience , which is why it appeared in icons and not in the mirror of the week or in ukrainian pravda, but with on the other hand, what he says there is stupid, in addition to the fact that everyone was frightened by his prediction about a possible russian offensive, well, many military experts have already talked about the fact that this is, so to speak, the worst-case scenario for which the military should really prepare, but

this does not mean that this is the only scenario without an alternative to that. well, for now, let’s leave the conversation about it and just wanted to ask about the resource part of this article, where zaluzhny simply says in my text that i am not asking you for f 16, but at least the shells of them it's banal enough already, even the commander of the united command of the united command of the south andriy kovalchuk says that our offensive in the kherson region was only 50-60% successful. it is because of the lack of projectiles in banal why in russia, despite the fact that they did not count on the number of projectiles from the very beginning, there are still enough of them, and the whole world cannot collect a sufficient number of projectiles for ukraine in order to give a decent rebuff to the enemies. let's start with the article on economics money said well the same

article is clearly indicated after the comments zelensky's engaging e-e is about the fact that once again there is a hint about crimea, ukraine should sort of hint at the possibility of deoccupation of crimea, but not to give up for a while, that is, again, he is trying to promote this trip of the day to us, even those articles. i urge you to read it carefully. from the side of the leading western changes, but less, but what concerns the signal, let's look at the defense budget of ukraine, one trillion, well, a little, well, 4 billion dollars, so that it is clear, the defense budget of the occupying country has increased several times according to the estimates of british specialists 142 billion imagine if we can stand up to the occupying country on an equal footing probably not the prepared mobilization reserve of the russian federation is 2

million with a total mobilization reserve of more than 10 million ago it is no coincidence that the president of ukraine in this article talks about what we need the permanent and expanded nature of the military-technical has ukraine alone can not cope, let's remember the intensity of russian fire at the beginning of the military campaign 60-70 thousand shells per day now on the bakhmut direction, 20,000 uah, goods, 20,000, the intensity of fire is more than during the years of the second world war, it is worth talking about it, and ukraine, unfortunately, faced the fact that there are no sets of soviet caliber 122-152 mm due to their undermining of warehouses. by the way, we should finally receive uh, clear information about those events, mr. yevgena, how do they start for me? at that time, they were very skeptical

. when we were told that these explosions at artillery depots in ukraine were all the hands of the kremlin, it was all done by russia, that's what we said. well, it seems more like our own negligence or our own sabotage in order to write it off or something. and here it turns out that no, what will it be, so that we understand, more was destroyed in warehouses than was released during all the years of the anti-terrorist operation, but why in the world was there no answer on at the moment, there are so many reserves of artillery shells and such simple primitive ground weapons that would help us to create a certain parity in artillery confrontations, are there resources that will be exhausted faster, our eh together with everything the world or the russian ones, whether they are rusty or old, but they still find something to cover our positions, the fact is that the russian federation has the possibility of restoring even conventional weapons , including artillery shells, this

infrastructure works, and it works well, at such an urgent pace, it is worth saying that the countries of the west were not ready after the actual fall of berlin pants that such military conflicts will actually arise, which in terms of intensity will resemble the years of the second world war, let's let's look at the actual defense budgets of the leading countries, a maximum of 2% of gdp was allocated to defense. do you remember that the previous administration of president trump demanded that european countries increase their defense budgets by 5%, because they clearly told the united states that they cannot shoulder the entire burden of the military provision of not only their country, but also the leading european countries, then everyone perceived it as pressure from the united states, but a clear signal was given, but this is about that, unfortunately, the countries of the west are,

i emphasize once again, not ready for such intensity of conflict with such use of actual projectiles and, accordingly, conventional types of weapons, and it is not by chance that i finish, sir , you know that the owner of the commercial decision rammstein sym came to the deconservation of factories for the production of soviet-style projectiles in the czech republic bulgaria, poland, 152 mm, yes, ukraine needs 70% of its own means of defeating the barrel artillery. unfortunately, it is still of the soviet model, but if the factories are opened, then your question. and who will overtake whom, so here is the question but let's look at the fact that in contrast to the 140 billion dollars of the defense budget of the russian federation, the budget of the united states of approximately 900,870.5

does not seem to be comparable figures, moreover, a significant part of this money will be directed precisely to resisting russian aggression, not a random statement of the united states itself that after the withdrawal from afghanistan, the united states will not allow more similar let's say so, er, well, maxims regarding the implementation of its foreign policy positions, and the language is practically we are switching to a full format confrontation yes confrontation of resources number of weapons financial confrontation globally on world players in russia against the united states of ukraine of eu countries a and e here the question will play the main role speed the opportunity to produce the opportunity of the economy maybe yes but well , on the one hand it goes the deconservation of several plants but in russia, after all. well, even from

soviet times, all these enterprises that were located beyond the urals, that manufacture weapons of the 6th world war ii, mr. yevgeny, have been preserved for everyone enterprises also need western technologies of equipment at all these enterprises, they are of western production, respectively, after the 14th year, the western ones introduced restrictions on the supply of corresponding weapons, therefore the production of 152 mm projectiles is significantly reduced , let’s talk about it, that is, there is no need to draw all in black colors because i emphasize the capabilities of the world's leading economies, primarily the united states, which is much greater than that of the russian federation, so i am convinced that the issue of deconservation activities of factories, adjusting the production of the same artillery projectiles, the ssu is absolutely necessary - it is literally a matter of a few months, moreover, it is no coincidence that

the same bulgarian air force has increased its well, let's say so, and earnings in general. well, export positions have tripled in 9 months about the fact that it may be much longer than we actually expected, and all these optimistic forecasts that in the spring we can already reach the borders of 91, they actually look like this now , well, a little more optimistic than er no no no no i would like to and i would like to ask you how you feel about the forecasts that are now literally today i heard the opinion of roman svitan, a well-known military analyst pilot colonel of the armed forces of ukraine, who spoke about what if ukraine really does not reach the border by spring 91 -th year, then this conflict can drag on for many years

, that is, it can continue for 10 years, but in such a rather hot state, sometimes one side of the border talks or the other, but at the same time nothing is resolved, nothing fundamental that is, the war does not end. do you agree with such predictions that it can last for so many years, not just one, and i explain why, colleagues, it is worth talking about the fact that in 9 months of the war, the armed forces of ukraine, where they occupied more than 40%, returned their own territories, this is the first first of all, on february 24, on february 24, moreover , let's recall the same interview with the economist, where zaluznoi says that the syrian one, by the way, that the occupiers are preparing several surprises, i do not exclude the possibility of carrying out an operation both in zaporizhzhia and, accordingly, in luhansk directions, all the more so because of the operational and strategic initiative acquired by the armed forces of ukraine, and this will again

talk about the accelerated nature of the deoccupation. let's go back to what we said , let's remember that once again the western media say that at the time of the deoccupation of crimea, ukraine may face, let's say , tough opposition from the russian federation, including the so-called of the nuclear scenario, that is, this issue will be a rubicon before the occupation of crimea. to what extent do you think this thesis that putin is really ready for the loss of human resources in the range of 300,000 to a million russians ? here it is not even putin who will

decide what level of loss is permissible here, well, the people themselves, the residents of russia, should decide this limit, it is quite a phantom, the number of executions for which there is an internal confrontation in russia or putin's readiness to withdraw to the borders in 1991 and the signing of some kind of peace, is there no limit at all in russia, they never counted how many plots there are actually among their servicemen, that's why there are only three numbers and a million, that's all, let's not count . 000, but let's say that this statistic, unfortunately, does not fit on the pulley or on putin's table, but there is no reaction to which we expect, moreover.

the forces of the russian federation are currently being compensated for the mobilization of the so-called special contingent, that is, they have found a way out, the victims will be among the prisoners, it is not by chance that 23,000 have been released from russian prisons in two months, for comparison, the largest amnesty in the russian federation for the 70th anniversary of the victory is 15,000 p yevgeny, please, this says 24 000 would be thrown to the front line, which should bear the brunt of the losses among the personnel and whether the losses will not be noticeable to russian society, and considering that in russia 400 000 places of deprivation of liberty is to talk about some kind of second stage of partial mobilization with which we are once again being intimidated at least as in my opinion , this is a little, well, too much, we have literally two minutes left, i want to ask you one more moment here, today, the

meeting of putin with lukashenko and with the ministers of defense, well, at least they announced such plans a-a we still don’t know what happened there, but what do you think this meeting was for, so that putin got out of his bunker, flew to belarus and personally met with lukashenka there? what is there for? this could happen. well, will he be persuaded to attack ukraine again, which he obviously does not want to do? it may become the very trigger for belarus to go to war outside the borders of ukraine . -political pressure, first of all, both on ukraine and, as it were, on western partners, a signal is given that we are ready to actually expand the front at the expense of the belarusian direction . but does this correspond to reality? on the eve of the invasion, western intelligence provides

detailed information about the concentration of russian troops on the borders with ukraine, on the other hand, currently there are clear statements by the biden administration and american intelligence , there are currently no reasons to talk about a possible belarusian direction; moreover , only 9,000 personnel of the armed forces are concentrated in the territory of the republic of belarus. of the russian federation, this is not the invasion of the continent, what can be agreed upon, the explanation of the e-e in the belarusian army is approximately 1300 t-72 tanks, agree if the russian the federation is currently deconserving t-62-t 64 tanks, these are the years of production of the tote 72, which is the main one in the armed forces of the russian federation. this will be the basis of these negotiations, that is, the transfer of military equipment of the armed forces of the republic of belarus for the needs of the russian federation. this

will be the main thing, and ukrainians should not be afraid, the belarusian direction is reliably under cover , you should not be afraid, but you want peace, prepare for war, we all hoped that 2022 would be a peaceful year he turned out to be a military man, but what will be next year, frankly, no one knows, we can only guess, analyze and make some predictions. but uh, we want peace, but we are ready for uh, that the war will continue until the complete victory of ukraine was with you. shnyryov visited us . see you on the air. they believe in themselves and in the armed forces of ukraine. this is a story about the sky, cinema, television, sports, music, education,

free people have a choice, choose what you want on megogo andriy yanitsky keeps the economy under control yes, we are talking about economic news on the espresso channel, but it is not about dry numbers and clear terms. it is about the economy. it is about the ability to analyze, forecast and profit, but what will be the exchange rates of salaries and pensions and how will the prices of products change? information about everything that affects our a wallet and informed means armed , see the economic news project with andriy yanitskyi, morning snack at eight o'clock in the morning , the war is going on, and not only for territories, it's also a

war for the minds of russia, millions of petrodollars rushes to turn ukrainians into little russia ukraine state of the highway dissection and analysis of information about ukraine by russian propagandists specific facts and methods by which hostile propaganda turns people into obedient zombies historical residents of the people's republic of china counter the information attacks of the russians in the project of the chronicle of the information war with olga laziness tuesday thursday about 11:40 a.m. and friday at 1:00 p.m. on the espresso tv channel, mykola veresen, vitaliy portnikov and the main topics of the week is if ne day is applied against ukraine god is really a tactical nuclear weapon, it will definitely change the world. stories, problems, analysis and personalities, we are waiting for john gerbs, the former

ambassador to the united states in ukraine. on february 24, russia attacked ukraine, ukrainians began to defend their homeland, part of the team of the espresso tv channel joined the ranks of the armed forces from the first days, journalists, directors , editors defend ukraine with weapons in their hands others inform ukrainians every day about the most important things in ukraine and the world, the struggle continues on the information front and the real front until our complete victory espresso the ukrainian view in ukraine seven in the morning greetings to all viewers of the espresso tv channel in the studio of iryna koval, we start our broadcast with a news release