because we write down something special like this on st. nicholas' day and yesterday i gave birth to a christmas tree, this is the only thing i must have done in order to create some kind of mood here i am, i think it will be completely quiet and calm at home and i want to ask you about one more holiday have already decided how it will be, how and where you will determine the day of our victory oh my god, of course it is here in kyiv, and i can’t even imagine, so far it is so difficult for me to imagine how exactly it will be, whether we will all be seen in the square on the street or where we will be gathered definitely probably it will be some kind of massive no no no i want to say ecstasy but that's also not the right word, you know, when i have something like this, here's a

picture that everyone just goes out into the street and like everything is not in danger anymore, here's someone like that it seems to me on the streets kyiv, i joined you as lukyanivka, please thank you julia for this conversation, thank you, you are the one who writes our new story every day. and we thank you. thank you that i can drink coffee and i really want to share it with you. thank you for life. can breathe air alone and speak the same language, thank you for the opportunity to be proud of you. every day i am almost working and 11 for you. thank you for a warm home. thank you that

thanks to you i can raise a child. we are waiting for you at home. thank you for the hope you give. thank you for your sincerity, your peculiarity, because the whole world admires you, when the enemy cannot achieve results on the battlefield, he resorts to cynical attacks on civilians, the russian invaders want to exhaust us, break us and divide us for them this is the last chance where they didn't count each other in these dark times we are united like never before we are

free and strong we are ready and even in the dark we see how our victory is coming we will defeat the darkness together on christmas one wish victory as if from a long blackout prepare for yourself and loved ones supplies of potable technical water warm clothes food charged batteries find out in advance save the contacts of medical institutions and addresses of emergency services from official websites or help services and the administration of your population, get ready now, let's defeat the darkness together, i think that the west's ability to supply weapons will remain, but

the nature of this support will change. welcome to the first channel of public broadcasting. thank you for agreeing to the interview. a few days ago, the pentagon announced what the new package of military aid to the united states would consist of states or did anything about it catch your attention thank you for inviting me to the program this was the 27th military aid package from the united states they are announced about every 2 weeks this package is pretty standard it does have a clause about air defense which is a bit vague it would be interesting to know what that might mean in the past the united states has supplied haar missiles against air missiles might be something like that the only thing that is really different is eh sue less ot motto eh it was mentioned that there is an item on the list of

air defense equipment, and we heard from us president biden that the united states prioritizes strengthening the air defense of ukraine. about what exactly it could be, because if you asked the ukrainians, they would definitely in this context, they mentioned the patriot system, maybe it will be it. no, it won’t be petriv batteries, it’s too important for the aid package. i mean, what would be noted separately, most likely it will be some kind of specialized system, maybe a missile, maybe even a subsystem, maybe some kind of electronic system a silencer, for example, something similar, a dress, something that can be integrated with weapons that are already in ukraine, as it was done before, for example, with a harming

simulator missile. this is a fairly popular topic in ukraine, which stops the united states. patriot systems is their complexity and fatigue how long it takes to train operators and technical personnel to maintain it in the field training program for example for wild repairmen lasts almost a year it also requires a very extensive supply chain to make sure that all parts items can be repaired so it is very it is difficult, it is from the same category, just now, for example, jet aircraft and patriot, and such aircraft would be a great addition during the post-war reconstruction of the ukrainian army. but it is very difficult to accept

their use during the war, there may be some efforts to start this process, for example , to bring several groups of ukrainian military to europe or the united states to start training, but it will take a long time before the patriot system is actually handed over to ukraine already after the recording of this interview in a number of foreign there was a message in the mass media that the usa could provide ukraine with the patriot system of official confirmation of this information. so far , there is no. after the appearance of these messages, mark kanchen wrote to us in a letter that he would be surprised if the usa does go for it, according to him, the transfer of patriots would be a risky step due to complex systems and possible difficulties in its transportation during the war, a separate question. how long will it take to teach the ukrainian military to use the patriot system? i think that the transfer

of additional air defense systems, such as the avenger, of which the united states has already sent four, we can send more, or possibly more systems, is more likely on samsung it depends on how much the united states is willing to risk on its own the problem with air defense in general is that after the cold war the united states nato allies eliminated most of their ground air defenses during the cold war of course the soviet union had a very large powerful air forces of nato and the united states built ground-based air defenses to protect their troops in the event of a conflict when the soviet the union did not have potential adversaries of the west, such as the soviets, iran, or north korea. they did not have a very powerful air force , so there was no need to maintain these

ground-based air defenses. as a result, the united states or other nato countries do not have many options to send to ukraine . because they eliminated most of these systems now the united states is rebuilding them and has several systems that are just coming out of development but they are not yet in the field at the same time as i already mentioned the united states can go at a greater risk with some stingar systems, for example, or hungarian, which are installed on jeeps, this would mean taking these systems from the american army. the united states is reluctant to go for it. but maybe they would be willing to take a little more risk, in any case, there are not so many available systems, therefore, unfortunately, it will be difficult to provide the level of air defense capability that the ukrainians really need. there is one more article that i would like to discuss with you , a british newspaper reported the other day with

reference to a source in the field of us defense the pentagon, i will quote further, gave tacit consent to strikes by ukraine against targets in russia. we can hope that there will be official confirmation of such information, as well as confirmation that ukraine is really striking inside russia. but do you allow the possibility that washington could change its position from of this question, i think we are talking about the fact that if ukraine attacks russian targets with its own forces, the united states will not object to this. ukraine recently carried out attacks in crimea, and these attacks on some bomber bases, the united states says that they are not going to protest against this, given the fact that the russians attack ukraine every day, such retaliatory strikes by ukrainians

are not groundless, which worries the united states. so this is the provision of american weapons to ukraine with which it could strike the territory of russia, in particular the issue it was about attack systems, it is possible that the us administration will change its position on this, but this is a very sensitive issue, the united states does not want it to look like they are attacking russia, putin did it the red line, and so far the united states adheres to it, is the curious tacit agreement of the united states to ukraine's strikes on russia, i quote, would mean quite a development in the war, because washington can now probably agree to provide ukraine with longer-range missiles. can we soon hear about the united states transferring missiles to ukraine longer range

, for example, the attacks you mentioned, it is possible, i think that this policy, which the source in the administration spoke about, does not really apply to the ukrainian potential to attack russia, of course, a lot of attention was paid attackams and many have spoken in favor of their supply to ukraine on the other hand the administration has been quite adamant so far there is evidence that the himers systems provided to ukraine were adjusted so that they can not fire attack missiles the united states can of course cancel it but so far i think it shows adamance their policy and it is unlikely to be changed british defense secretary ben wallace said this week that he would be open to the idea of ​​transferring longer-range missiles to ukraine if russia continued its attacks on civilians

the infrastructure of ukraine, could this affect the position of the united states regarding longer-range missiles? i mean the position of great britain and the new russian attacks on civilian infrastructure . be careful not to allow escalation due to attacks on the territory of russia. i think that for now this will continue and in the future, of course , many, in particular in great britain, argue that the united states should provide these opportunities, but in the end it is the united states the states will make decisions it's easy to tell someone else what to do but you can see that the united states is helping ukraine in its ability to strike russia maybe helping with what ukraine

is using to carry out those strikes the states could provide some assistance or consideration or maybe even some installations that would help ukrainian systems to carry out these attacks but not to attack american systems, you recently commented to the new york times on the issue of weapons stocks and of ammunition in those western countries that provide military aid to ukraine, now more and more such publications are appearing, is this problem critical, or can it affect the west's ability to supply weapons to ukraine in the future, i think that the west's ability to supply weapons will remain, but the nature of this support will change, people who areas where the united states has provided approximately as many systems and ammunition as they are willing

to provide, taking into account that they are taking them from the american military. the united states has transferred to ukraine all surplus systems that are they were plus they squeezed a lot out of training bases and maintenance bases and thus collected several more systems that can send weapons from some units, but the united states is reluctant to do this, the restraining factor is other military plans, for example, the defense plan of the baltic states or korea, as well as some in other regions, certain types of weapons are at a level where it would be very risky to waste stocks even more is one of the examples. i think we will see two things here , firstly, replacement, we already see what for example

the us doesn't send javelins anymore instead they send rockets which are even heavier anti tank weapons and the us has a lot of them they are used by infantry they are too heavy but you can put them on a vehicle it is still a very effective weapon the us provides millimeter howitzers and ammunition for them and not 155 mm because we have reached the limits on this howitzer and ammunition but with that five millimeter howitzer can be a very effective weapon it was standard in the usa a few years ago and some american units still use it. another thing you will see is that the united states is now more actively buying weapons and ammunition in other countries. we see this , for example, with the czech t-72 tanks. they are sent to

ukraine, the united states also buys artillery ammunition from south korea and sends it to ukraine, please hand it over because of the violation of the united states, because south korea is reluctant to provide it directly. i think that you you will see even more of this besides the united states literally has teams all over the world that buy weapons and ammunition that can be useful in the war some of them are soviet-era systems so the united states bought a lot of ut-72 tanks ppos-300 helicopter systems and they want buy even more plus they are buying ammunition of nato standard for example i think we will see even more of this what you can say about the stockpiles of weapons in russia and in general about its ability to wage war or do you see signs that these capabilities are decreasing actually this is a question i should ask you since you are

watching it from the front row so to speak but if you look at how the russians are conducting the ground war i don't see any reduction in their combat potential they did this partial mobilization of course it was very chaotic but it gave russia a lot of new soldiers and i think it helped the russians to stabilize the front line they are still producing a lot of munitions they are estimated to continue to do so until at least spring 2023 plus they they buy ammunition from north korea, they will probably buy even more from other sources, or again from north korea, where i see a decrease in potential, then this is about missile attacks . attacks can still be devastating

missile strikes have become episodic they no longer happen every day russians launch rockets in batches and over time their number probably decreases i think we are already watching reducing their number, you said that i could tell you. more as a person who is in ukraine, i can tell you about what unpleasantly struck us all a few months ago, this is the cooperation between russia and iran. russia began to use kamikaze drones produced in iran against ukrainians for infrastructure attacks so i want to ask you about this cooperation. the pentagon recently expressed concern about the growing cooperation between russia and iran in the field of defense. the us did not talk so much about the fact that russia is getting weapons

from iran, how much about russia's intentions to transfer to iran advanced military components, in particular helicopters and anti-aircraft defense systems uh-uh somewhere interesting and at the same time that russia is not only still able to produce weapons, but also has enough of them to transfer them to other countries weapons to over contraes that russia will really experience a lack of opportunities to arm itself and

others. years, russia will need all the weapons it can produce for its own forces, but what particularly worries the united states is russia's transfer of missile technology and knowledge to iran, and possibly even nuclear weapons. iran is developing missiles and using them against its neighbors, it already has a fairly complex defense base missile technology, russia could help in this, increase accuracy, increase the range, could even help with nuclear weapons, in which the iranians were very interested. and this is what worries both the united states and other countries of the middle east. regarding the future of the russian military potential, the russians have shown that they are able to maintain their forces in the field , their logistics were terrible and

the suffering of the military was extraordinary, their mobilization was chaotic, but they are getting their forces on the battlefield. they have been on the ground for more than 10 months. i think there is a possibility that they will be able to continue to do this in the future it will just be a long and unfortunately very bloody struggle to oust them to have an external influence on russia's ability to wage war or only internal factors will have an effect on it the united states the whole world has made many attempts to influence russian policy against russia have imposed extraordinary sanctions that have worsened its economy and ability to produce weapons they are still able to produce some weapons but it does not

seem to have affected russia's decision-making more influenced by domestic politics and not the international community. putin does not want to burden his population too much. he declares that this is a special military operation and not a war. the attitude of the population is similar, which is a greater deterrent factor. apart from that, the only thing can affect the duration of this war, it is the success of the armed forces of ukraine on the field, i'm afraid. unfortunately, i think that is the case now. it does not seem that the two countries have any point of contact that could create a basis for negotiations. ukraine has put forward the conditions that it wants to return all

its territory crimea in particular is quite fair, but putin has made it clear that he is not going to concede anything, so there really is no common position here that would facilitate negotiations; besides, negotiations may be counterproductive given the fact that the western the public is prone to impatience, they expect that if the parties start negotiations , an agreement will soon be reached and then pressure will begin to sign a bad agreement, something like a cease-fire, which will allow putin to keep the conquered territories in afghanistan, the negotiations with the taliban turned out to be very tough and in the end the united states gave in we we do not want this to happen in the negotiations with russia regarding the end of the war. thank you, mr. kanchan, for this

conversation, which i was invited to . time slows down the destruction of people in the brightest way we hold on buy from beads it is simple and not the strength tired to hold on to a sharp fatal mistake even though the rains are severe in the flow in the resource you can use the device keep my course buzzing generators of languages ​​in thousands we hold the truths hold the stream

if you ask me who am i for sure ordinary study work what free time but if i'm honest i feel that it's not mine of course there are those whom i love whom i cherish people for whom i am an army for christmas one wish victory do you have

a type of reception t2 today your tuner accepts no all ukrainian channels to set up reception of channels on the tuner or tv remote press the menu button, go to the settings menu, select the auto search item , scan and press the ok button to save the search results if you need help, go to the site or contact the telemasters in your region , i cannot say that hungary or hungarian , even the government, he is pro-russian, it’s simply not true, they are simply not even clear to us anymore, the movement is played by mrs. yaroslava. good afternoon. i welcome you to the first channel of public broadcasting, i thank the ukrainians for agreeing to talk today, and i want to take this opportunity to thank our

people for their resilience, for the courage of our soldiers, warriors, boys and girls, because i have always been proud that i am involved in this nation of the ukrainian people, and the war decided everything and that is why i am proud that my people can withstand such trials, and in moderation, thank you very much, and you have been living in hungary for several decades and know firsthand what is happening in this country about the public mood about the political sentiments of hungarian politicians. and i would like to talk to you a little about this. because since the beginning of russia's full-scale aggression against ukraine, we have only heard that hungary has blocked some aid to ukraine, then it blocks money from the eu, then it blocks the transit of weapons, then the training of the ukrainian military, then sanctions in the energy sector, then one more thing. can

you explain somehow what motivates hungary, which is part of the european union and part of nato, to stick such sticks in the wheels of ukraine? well, you know. once upon a time, we understood the contradictions between the two states when the law on language came out, they were dissatisfied with that law, but it is always despite the interruptions, but they supported and there was communication, there were no frequent visits, but at such a political level. our embassies, that is, orban supported ukraine. even before the war, the provision of a visa-free regime, he was one of those defenders of ukraine, and when the war began and when refugees and many refugees were accepted here, the

communication of the hungarian government and us i don't understand today, because on the one hand they say that we support the territorial integrity of ukraine, taras, we worry about ukrainians and hungarians, especially the hungarians of transcarpathia. as far as i know, then she goes there further to the front, the hungarians accepted not only refugees, but now our wounded sapper guys who exploded under the raisins are being treated here, we are going there. that is, it accepted the ministry of defense and, on the other hand, we see from the very beginning of the war an incomprehensible communication for us that we want peace.