they fit the concept what difference does it make if i grew up like this and that’s why i want to die communicating with this language and independently returns to the ukrainian language uh-uh definitely a tool of uh-uh empire language has always been and always will be because it is a way of subjugating occupied peoples and language and culture and some common points of contact in history, it is very good that putin is now rising to the shield again, because all his attempts to announce something key, be it gas or culture, will end with the dismantling of these systems , so i would really like to see the complete dismantling of the russian language in ukraine in 2012 and as one contributor very successfully said that i am the last native speaker of the russian language and i want this russian language to die with me, it will probably be a calm organic path that will lead

to the fact that this attempt by the grofins to communicate in the ukrainian language, with which they were born, the russian language will clearly fail and the experiment will be forgotten today, mr. volodymyr, the ukrainian delegation to the united nations must raise the question of russia's exclusion or the question of the russian federation's membership in the un security council. we remember that in 1991 in the year when the soviet union disintegrated in the organization of the united nations, there were three entities from the soviet union of the time at the time of its disintegration, this is the soviet union itself, ukraine and belarus as the founders of the russian federation e-e wrote a letter then in the organization of the united nations and bee about the fact

that she is the legal successor of the soviet union, and therefore the positions in the un that were held by the soviet union, russia decided to appropriate or let's say to appropriate to itself , that is, the local un and a place in the un security council the current attempt by ukrainian diplomats to raise this issue is due to the fact that due to russia's position, due to its veto, which it constantly uses, it is impossible to discuss issues in the council of ministers, including those that touch on the punishment or, let's say, the responsibility of the russian federation for the war in ukraine in your opinion, can the oun now become the platform and correct the mistakes that we have seen over the last year regarding russia's responsibility to the

world and to ukraine? i remember the times when ukraine raised the issue of russia's exclusion and the composition of the un security council and the composition of such organizations, but then no one understood us at all, it is known that they thought that we were greatly exaggerating or hyperbolizing the situation, now the understanding is that russia definitely does not have a place among the permanent members of the un security council, and it already includes not only the united states, but the european union a lot of other leading states, but there is indeed a lack of a legal mechanism as such , and here russia itself can become an obstacle, because i think that we could follow a certain precedent and ignore it this mechanism, although it would be a gross violation of the rules, no less than russia was violating international law even more grossly. but the issue of china is still not clarified, and it seems to me that the voice of china was actually on

this platform, which is influential enough to slow down the to one degree or another, these processes and perhaps powerful players will agree with the fact that, let's say, the presence of russia in the un is not the key to resolving the war, because even if russia is excluded now, it will not stop the war, but in the future it will undoubtedly serve as a serious precedent for any other nuclear state had no right, being in the security council, blocking one or another decision, whether or not the security council would simply attack other states, especially non-nuclear ones, that is why the mechanism will be developed, and we see that russia's war with ukraine, it pushed very a lot of changes and a lot of reforms in a number of such system institutions that thought they were working effectively, but it turned out that on the contrary, it is

obvious, mr. volodymyr, that the number one topic for the russians will be the topic of possible negotiations with they are constantly torpedoing this topic in ukraine. now they turn to this topic. the same putin says that we do not mind sitting down at the negotiating table there, but you see that the ukrainians do not want to sit down at the negotiating table, as much as the united states does not allow them there the united states of america and the west and they adopted or signed zelensky’s decree on the implementation of the decision of the national security and defense council on the impossibility of holding visits from russia until they leave our territory, meanwhile , russian propagandists in person the newly-minted family-bearer of the tsimanyans are pushing new proposals for negotiations,

the editor-in-chief goes there and assures the viewers that the minimum compromise is to leave the occupied territories to them, let's watch a fragment of a tv program with the participation of the semenians , because the request and ukraine will never agree to any compromise except the return of not only our new territories, but also you will never understand crimea, they will not go for anything less than this, and they have no reason and no motivation to go to any compromise, they will not give back. and we what we did maxim, we will return krym, here you imagine that we will return krym well, just imagine that you are what putin says, sorry , it did not work, we will return krym this is a disaster for us with our minimal victory , we could recognize it, as it seems to me, russia could recognize minimally this is the key to its minimal preservation these are the new territories that you think there are, mr. volodymyr. what compromises can ukraine make in the negotiations with russia, or

can these compromises not be, in principle, a sign for me that it was a moment of unwillingness to compromise with the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi. i was very glad to hear this from him, because i remember other stories related to his desire to meet with putin. i don't listen to russian rhetoric about negotiations or compromises . the existence of the soviet union and to the extent that we measure up to the fact that we do not want to fight, and at the same time, by provoking wars, they provoke tensions or clashes, by pouring money into the exercises of radical or left-wing radical organizations to destabilize certain governments with which they didn't want to make friends, this is a passed stage with russia, there's nothing to talk about and we see that the west is the same thank god it clearly understands that there is nothing to negotiate with russia and they

don't keep their word and they don't want to go to ukraine's terms, that's why russia continues say that they are ready for negotiations, but ukraine also continues to say that we are ready for negotiations, but deploy your troops to the borders of 1991, imprison your criminals and pay compensation in the form of reparations to ukraine and its allies, that's all it is decided on the battlefield, it was obvious from the very beginning and it will be so. thank you, mr. volodymyr , for participating in the program. those who are currently watching us on youtube. i ask you to like this video and subscribe to our youtube channel. well, under this video you can find the sponsor button, you can become a sponsor of our youtube channel, for this you need to do there are absolutely not many, a few steps, follow

the link to sponsor, we will be grateful for your help to our youtube channel well, we will continue to contact mykhailo, a military expert himself, a person who knows about the armed forces of ukraine everything or practically everything, mr. mykhailo, and have a good day good health to you. thank you for joining our broadcast , mr. mykhailo, let's start with today's attack on engels and podyageleva airfields, because this situation is repeated and someone is already starting to joke on social networks that this is happening the decommunization of engels and engels is gradually turning into a chernobaivka e-e to e-e of these two airfields 500-600 km. we know that earlier ukroboronprom reported that it was

completing the development of opportunities that appear on the ukrainian side in order to transfer hostilities from the territory of ukraine to russian territory and to what extent is it possible, how far is it possible to expand this zone where russian planes, russian bombers, and the russian military in general will not feel very comfortable well, really, really the destruction of the base infrastructure of strategic aviation or other aircraft that carry out strikes on ukrainian territory is an overriding task, that is, if we achieve the fact that russian aviation will not be able to base itself within a radius of 1,000 km, in any case, the most important thing for carrying out strikes on ukraine is there will be a sharp decrease in the possibilities for russia

to influence in any way other than tactical weapons on the ukrainian territory, of course we will have great advantages from this and now these strikes on engels are already the second strike on the only one actually in russia the airfield at which the comprehensive provision of preparation for the use of strategic bomber aircraft is carried out is extremely important because if the infrastructure that provides preparation for the use of aesthetic bomber aircraft is damaged during this strike, it will be a strategic strike on the capabilities of the russian federation in general on one of the components of its triad because it is necessary will now build and equip another airfield, which will obviously have to be done somewhere within a radius of more than a thousand kilometers on the territory of the russian federation and this is all time and resources. well, the reduction of the possibilities of using

aesthetic construction aviation is on the territory of ukraine, which is on the territory of europe, so i believe that these strikes and that are evidence that we have these weapons a-a it starts more and more often to be used is an extremely positive trend by mikhail last week, the minister of defense of the russian federation, shoigu, together with president putin, announced that they will strive to increase the russian army to one and a half million people in 2023. we know that at the beginning of the war there were 1 million in the russian army, then they increased their army by 150,000. well, now they plan to increase it by another 350,000. what does it mean for russia to increase such a number of people, considering

that putin constantly says that we let 's strengthen the leningrad moscow military districts, it is obvious to leningrad in connection with the possible accession of finland to nato, and moscow is obviously because it is possible to transfer hostilities from the territory of ukraine to the territory of russia, but what does that mean 1.5 million for russia and what should be ukraine's response in this case. we are not talking about increasing the number of our army yet. why, actually, this is evidence that putin's previous plans failed, that is, first of all, we remember that he had a stage when he said that in three days he would take those forces for 10 countries, then he had a stage when he, with the same forces that he had, tried to break through the defenses in the donbas, but again it did not

work, after that a partial so -called partial mobilization was carried out and have started strikes on the ukrainian energy infrastructure, creating a humanitarian crisis and thus trying to change the strategic situation at the front, again nothing came of it, and uh, this decision, and especially the fact that now they have started pr, what are you showing him right now, he is flying somewhere in helicopters, he is traveling on putin began to visit defense enterprises in the same way, demonstrating that russia is coming to the military in general, and perhaps it is necessary to declare a state of war , that is, they actually recognized by their actions that all these previous efforts turned out to be useless and now they are moving to the next stage. i think that after the new year holidays , another wave

of mobilization will be held or announced, it will be announced that martial law is actually being introduced and putin simply has no other choice. exit, how to increase the number of personnel , e.e., to increase the capabilities of one’s staff. but i think that time is wasted, that is, according to various estimates, so that at least somehow these decisions that they are making now, e.e., have an effect on e.e. really on the field the battle needs at least two months, that is, they would now obviously like to achieve some kind of operational pause in order to allow them to create these reserves and try or break the e-lobe in donbas again, and perhaps also create in parallel to open the northern front, which we are constantly talking about from the territory belarus but i think that i am sure that the ukrainian army will not allow them to get this pause for two months, and the events literally right now on the front show that the armed forces continue to actively use their

strategic initiative and act actively on in the east and in the south, and this means that putin simply does not have two months to implement these decisions physically, what does one and a half million from the russian side mean for ukraine or do we need to respond symmetrically , that is, they increase it by 350 well, then we have to increase it by 350 because manpower, as we can see from the side of the russian federation, is used simply to crush, to pelt the russian-ukrainian front with bodies, and i absolutely disagree with this logic. who says that i don't need people, i need 300 tanks, i need 700 bmp bacteria and 500 e modern artillery systems. that is, in principle, he named such uh. well, what is the first thing that comes to mind, but of course he also needs high-precision systems, he needs aviation

he himself pro systems and so on. that is, we are now in the 21st century, the armed forces must perform the role or function as a reconnaissance strike complex, and not as a one and a half million machine for turning people into minced meat. that is, these are completely different approaches. i am sure that 300,000 or 500,000 for russia will not change anything now, since the main initiative is in the hands of ukraine and if ukraine continues. command posts, logistics, warehouses with ammunition, management system, accumulation of personnel, what we see now, both in the east and in the south, the russians will again throw new chmobikes. well, this does not lead to any results at all from the point of view

will not lead to a turning point in the situation, will only lead to huge losses among the russian population, which is currently suffering, but when the economic situation worsens, and it will worsen, it will already begin to worsen , because finally in december, real sanctions against russia related to oil and gas began to be introduced. i hope that it is possible that the west will also mature against the atom e-e, which today is literally dew there today published its report, it now has a portfolio of orders of 200 billion dollars excuse me, this is a company that actually now manages the occupied zaporizhzhia npp and it has a portfolio of 200 billion dollars, including most of their orders with our western partners, that is, real sanctions will lead to the fact that the standard of living of russians will begin to fall, and this will immediately be imposed and multiplied by these losses , so i think that we do not need to respond in a mirror

manner we need to increase our technical readiness to destroy russian soldiers. well, the armed forces of ukraine successfully cope with this, at least at the hottest point bakhmut in donetsk region, the head of donetsk of the regional military administration, pavlo kirylenko, says that 60% of the infrastructure of bakhmut has already been destroyed, he also emphasized that the troops of the russian federation continue to use scorched earth tactics, destroying populated areas with all the types of weapons available to them. the kholodny yar brigades talk about the operational situation around bakhmut says that the wagnerites discredit the regular troops of the russian federation, we hear bakhmut - this is the center of the city, you see bakhmut - this is ukraine, there are none here for the period

there is no such thing as rubricate comrades, they constantly say that they have already taken over. well, they spend millions of dollars on their faces and all the time they try to carry out some kind of informational attacks. i will briefly explain why bakhmut is so important, uh, for zaporebrik, first of all, they need to show some kind of victory there in general because after kyiv, kherson, kharkiv , there is absolutely nothing to show. and inside their terrorist country, there are several groups of influence, and one of the groups of influence is private military companies. they are completely their armed forces have discredited the second army of the world and now, in order to pretend to be the bunker grandfather, they are trying to capture bakhmut, but for this - for ukraine, it is the same whether they are private or regular

. means and what does bakhmut mean to russians and why do they fight so fiercely and avidly for it well , first of all, in principle, the history of bakhmut began even earlier, it was one of the directions of the offensive of russia when the izyumsk liman group still existed when it still existed the southern group when they tried to encircle the ukrainian forces in the donbass from april and thus change the aesthetic situation, but gradually. when the kharkiv region of the limansk region was liberated, the izum group disappeared, er, in the south, things did not go very well for the russians, but this direction remained, but absolutely true. i agree with our military personnel that in fact now there is more motivation for

the prigozhinian er. of the regular forces and i think that prigozhin personally promised putin that he would by the new year anyway, although the dates were earlier but it started much earlier and there were also dates in november until the day of this russian unity or people's day, i don't remember what the holiday is called but the dates have changed, but the new year, i think it is already some kind of extreme date, because the way they are pushing now, how many personnel are they throwing, what kind of passions do they have, maybe you saw a video where an officer just beats his subordinates with a stick i.e., what kind of moral and psychological state do they have now in these editorials or vk? that is, it is actually a personal promise to putin by prigozhin, who tried to demonstrate that he will now show and be able to reach some new level, including political mania. but

it will be a downfall for prigozhin he is trying of course now to crush him somehow, perhaps this battle will be called no longer so important , that is, prigozhyn will say that they will now take care of other things and that, in principle, this situation can end, but there is one more mine hypothesis that in order to get that operational pause for two months that we just talked about, the russians can simply conduct such protracted combat operations of a tactical plan, in fact, but stretching the ukrainian forces as much as possible along the entire front so that the ukrainians cannot concentrate and conduct their offensive operations that are currently being conducted in the east and in the south, and it is just such a tight battle, the bloodthirsty russians do not spare their personnel and in this way drag it all out until, for example, the end of february. when they they will believe that they will be ready to carry out a new mongoose jump, let's conditionally say yes, but i am sure that once again the armed forces of ukraine will break these plans and

will conduct their offensive operations in accordance with their decisions and plans the fact that in april 2023 , russia may launch a new offensive, and the germans refer to their data and say that moscow has calculated help, minsk writes about it well, the zürgerzeitung also writes about a possible offensive writes the crysis site, they claim that now putin is doing this in order to push lukashenko to participate, either indirectly or in a large-scale

campaign against ukraine. the northern border of ukraine, and let me remind you that belarus has more than 1,000 km of common border, is quite actively discussed by both experts and the military, and the general staff of ukraine regularly provides information on how ready that side is which is located in the south of belarus. let me remind you that it is the russians and belarusians before a possible invasion of ukraine. what do you think , can putin and lukashenka open the northern front for ukraine? i will say right away that at the moment there is no group that would be sufficient to conduct an operation in other words, there are about 9,000 russians of ukraine on the territory of belarus, or there are about 15,000 belarusian units that are actively demonstrating that they

are preparing, but there is no information about those reserves that were sufficient to carry out for this they need at least 50 and better 80 or 100,000 military personnel of the group, of course, equipped with the appropriate weapons and military equipment and then we could talk about the danger or threat at the moment there is no such threat, of course, when we talk about these two months of operational pause, about the fact that the russians will now recruit, increase the number of armed forces to 1.5 million and will obviously carry out mobilization, again they will need about 2 months, which is at least minimal to prepare this reserve and just when i was talking about these two months and where they can make their drinks eh belarus is one of the options because eh from a military point of view it is

quite logical to start several operations from the territory of belarus in order to stretch the ukrainian forces not to give them opportunities to realize their plans and to carry out concentrated operations in the east and south, it is necessary to maximally , and let's say so, the diametrically opposite side to organize and commit ukrainian troops to combat operations even if it will be and not successful military operations for putin, this may at one point be the only way out, because if ukraine begins to actively implement ideas regarding the liberation of the south, for example, and they begin the deoccupation of crimea, then for putin it may already be the last chance to throw in as many forces from the territory of belarus as possible to tie ukrainian forces are in these hostilities. but i think that at that moment it will be a complete collapse and ukrainian troops can already cross the border and begin the liberation of belarusians from the lukashenko regime, i.e. russia has wasted a lot of time when we

speak there, six months ago there was one situation, now it is another, and in the next three months there will be another situation, that is, i think that once again the armed forces of ukraine understand this perfectly and will not give the russians a break so that they can prepare the necessary a reserve that can be used in the donbass or in belarus, so if the ukrainian troops now actively carry out their actions, the russians have their reserve, which they will only prepare, they will be forced to do so just like the first wave of mobilization to simply plug the holes that appear on the front, this is how it turned out with the first wave of mobilization, it was there, but it seems that it did not exist because it dissolved , and in those units that lost their combat capability, combat readiness, and as a result, it simply disappeared, and it will be the same from the next minute of mobilization, if they do not concentrate it in the reserves, but immediately throw it to the front line, the

last question in this program is mykhailo putin is determined for a long-term war with ukraine. putin is determined for a war until the end he understands that this project, which he started and thought would last two weeks, has turned into the battle of his life, that is, he has no life, either political or physical, after the end of this war, even when you showed the russian propagandists , now they themselves say that imagine what will happen if we, uh, leave crimea, it will be a disaster, it will not be a disaster for the russians, it will be a disaster for the putin regime, and this is exactly what they are aware of and of course they will fight to the last to the last russians us, of course, thank you, thank you, mr. mykhailo it was mykhailo himself and a military expert and it was a verdict program conducted by serhiy

rudenko, i invite you friends to subscribe to our e-e resources in social networks we are everywhere we are on telegram we are on facebook and instagram in telegram well, in addition, join our website es tv, we work 24 hours a day, seven days a week, we work for you so that go to our website and i will say goodbye to you tomorrow tomorrow at 17:10 we will meet again in the arctic good bye - this is the freedom of life detectives have taken on a large construction and are conducting searches in