yes yes question in april, even in march 2014, i, as the ambassador of ukraine to the united states of america, sent the ministry of foreign affairs an official letter on 6 sheets containing a proposal that russia should go through the procedure of joining the united nations and e- eh also eh eh approved its eh status as a permanent member of the security council and in other words that russia does not deserve such a status well, unfortunately at that time i never received any answers from the ministry of foreign affairs but it is good that this question now violated really is in first of all, show ukraine all the arguments. and that

russia did not go through the procedure, as it had to go through the admission to the organization of libraries, and that the seat in the security council, which it currently holds as a permanent seat in the security council, the former seat of the soviet union, is also a big issue internationally . - the legal point of view of the fact that even today in the un constitution, it is indicated in the statute that the permanent seats in the security council are occupied by the united states of america, china, france, great britain and the soviet union , pro-russia. oleksandr motsak, i have one more question for you . the secretary of state of the united states of america, anthony blinken, said a few days ago that only ukraine should decide and will decide what a just and durable peace is, which volodymyr zelenskyi said

when he was in washington last week. please tell me . this is the statement of the secretary of state of the united states of america, a person who is probably in the top ten most influential people, that is, the people who make the policy of the united states of america, this is the statement about the green light for ukraine rather, such a statement can be considered a green light given by the united states of america to ukraine in order for ukraine to move forward, i will say that president biden also supported ukraine's vision of a just peace, and president zelenskyi said about it, if i'm not mistaken , during the press conference, yes, they are fair for ukraine, and this is the return of all ukrainian lands under the sovereignty of ukraine, that is, the occupation of those territories that are currently occupied, this is the donbas south, and the sam, the crimea, the bloc, it is strange if everything was

different, if the world supported ukraine in another way, because an international crime has been committed. russia attacked ukraine without any grounds, without any arguments, committed an act of aggression, an act of war, by the way, the definition of aggression is contained in the resolution of the general assembly from 1974 and one of the co-authors of the entire resolution and the country that promoted this resolution was ukraine and in this visualization there is article 3, which enumerates seven actions that make up each of these verbs has an act of aggression, so out of 7-6 actions directly relate to the situation of aggression of russia against ukraine, so once again russia has carried out an international crime, this international crime

consists in the fact that it started a war against ukraine and seized part of the territory of ukraine , so there can be a just peace when international law is restored . and the sovereignty of the state, the hetman’s final act, where everything is also clearly spelled out, and only when international law regarding ukraine is restored and all ukrainian territories are returned to the subsultan of ukrainians then it can be assumed that a just peace will take place. well, we will obviously wait for this just peace, and very quickly, mr. oleksandr kraev. i have a question for you. volodymyr zelenskyi - the president of ukraine said last week again that he is preparing this peace plan. he said this in washington and that he is going to present

this peace plan by february or february, have you ever had any? i know you often have insiders about what might be in this peace plan, first of all, such direct indians. unfortunately , there are none yet and i cannot share them, but that there is an awareness, firstly, of the dichotomy of justice or peace - it is rather justice, because the wording itself is fair to peace, it says that we are not ready for peace on any terms, secondly, from a military, from a political point of view, obviously we accepted the concept that any what negotiations can begin on the borders in the 91st year, before that any negotiations can be either probin prisoners or in the case of extreme necessity about a temporary ceasefire , thirdly, russia must bear responsibility, that is, once again they send for justice or peace, part of justice is not only the restoration of the borders of ukraine after the 91st year, but also the

responsibility of russia for the horrors, the acts that we have that they committed on the territory of ukraine, this payment of contributions, this is the ukrainian infrastructure of the economy and this is international law responsibility, i.e. conducting trials of violators of the laws of war and international law, therefore at least these points in one or another variation in one or another number will definitely be presented there, but i will repeat one of the main ones the conditions for the start of any constructive full-fledged negotiations are the liberation of the entire territory of ukraine, well, they really sound like a fair plan for a fair peace for ukraine, in fact, eh, volodymyr - oleksandr motsak, see why, giving us so many weapons, we return to weapons from, in particular, the united states of america, why giving us so many weapons, washington still does not want to recognize us as a partner outside of nato, you know, here

we are now. the main thing is to have the full support of america and the entire western world on all the issues that interest us the most right now. these are the following questions. the first is indeed the most modern weapons, and in the quantities and at the time when we are asking not the day after tomorrow, but today . we need

international help. individuals, the introduction of secondary sanctions so that this regime of sanctions is simply suffocating for russia and so that russia understands that it has a lot to lose and needs to sit down at the negotiating table, but not on the absurd conditions that it proposes, but on the conditions that the territory of ukraine must be completely freed from the occupiers, the fight against russian propaganda, which is also a powerful tool of this war being waged against ukraine, these are the main issues that are most relevant to us today and from which we should receive help well and plus the leadership of america, of course, america’s

leadership in the western world, and with that, so that it ideally motivates the european countries to help ukraine, which promised the aid did not decrease in any way, did not stop, but only increased with the understanding of what the president and vklersholz are talking about and the same matron, some other statements that ukraine has the full right to liberate its territory and for this we need the comprehensive help of a collective action that today we are ukraine, our armed forces, our defense forces today protect the entire the civilized world is protecting democracy, protecting the future of people and the euro in europe

and all over the world. continues, you just need to understand that as if it is a cold war in different parts of the world, it is going on in different ways specifically. in ukraine, it is going on in the form of a hot full-scale frontal war on a more global level, we see the ideological, political and sometimes economic confrontation between the two key power centers of the prc and the united states, in other parts of the world we see in one form or another active hostilities, as in ethiopia, for example, or threats of the use of force, as in taiwan or north korea, we see economic confrontation in latin america, in africa, between china and local players, that is, we are at the stage of a new global confrontation, which, if you wish, can be called a new iteration of the cold war, unfortunately. well, thank you, thank you for participation in my program today i congratulate you on the new year and remind our viewers that in the first part oleksandr motsyk, extraordinary and

plenipotentiary of ukraine in the united states of america from 2010 to 2015, diplomat and oleksandr kraev, expert of the council of foreign policy, ukrainian prisma , took part in the first part well, i already have the next guest on the phone with whom i will discuss a different topic, but now i will summarize very briefly before introducing him, i will summarize the results of the voting that is going on on youtube . we asked you a question, will russia be absorbed belarus voted for 167 people, 67% think so, no, 27%, and 7 percent watch your option, well, at least on the channel that is specially allocated for our program, 722 people join in. well, i am ready to introduce the next guest - this is ihor yakovenko, journalist, teacher, former deputy

mrs. yakovenko of the state duma of the russian federation hello. well, let's talk about russia with you. let's talk about belarus. let's start with how you can comment on information about putin may start a new large-scale new large-scale attack on ukraine in two or three months, this may be hmmm, he may try, that is, actually, uh, i don't think that anyone thinks that uh, putin will he sits and waits for them to come after him and take him away, and he fed us to the defendants , so it's not enough. of ukrainian cities, all this will be a mandatory second question what is the extent of this

it will be successful here, there are serious doubts, moreover, there is confidence that the potential of the russian army is not exhausted . it won't be. how then will the russian society react? that's your word, that's what they said, two words behind which, in my opinion, there is no designated name of the object of the russian society. there is no society in russia, but i think that you know this in russia. population in russia is citizens is population a-a but society is not that is why it matters population does not react yes yes analysis we have objectivity that is, in fact russians do not have the opportunity to react somehow

well that is, each of the russians has a feeling has a feeling uh, so say some feelings and you can react at home, but there is an opportunity to somehow show a reaction, uh, politically significant, there is no such opportunity at all, in fact , uh, in russia, in historical russia, if you take it broadly, but it was not not a single case but for a long period, starting with the moscow tsar, when power would, for example, change in elections, so well, you can't cite a single such example, and the soviet union, and before the soviet union, and in soviet russia, there was not a single case when power changed by election therefore, in general, there is no need for putin to worry especially about defeat. he only needs to worry about the fact that how will the power structures treat everything, here are the power structures - this is important and what kind of it is

it will be salted by its own army, here is a problem, here is a threat, and this opportunity exists, that is, uh, my next, my next question should have been like that, but i will move it to the same one, to which you have already answered that for putin, the most valuable uh деньги glory, power, or life, for which he will fight until the end жизнь жизнь yes and that's what you said i just er-er one more phrase a-a the point is that for him er-er life and power are the same thing and too, uhu, that is, he lost his pleasure, he loses his life, so of course in the end, life is unconditional, but the powers of life are one and the same, that is, there is no gap between these two concepts . now

, hardly a second, but in the foreseeable future, i think that such an option , the loss of power in 2023, exists . well, we are removing the foundations of the world. so to speak, there is no predictability, so the probability that he will lose a moose in 2023 exists, and this probability is related to the severity of the defeat, which made it clear that putin will not win this war, it was clear already on february 24, but how, in what way, is he going to suffer defeat , how severe this defeat will be, it is not predetermined and regardless of the fact that, well, we relate to you, that's how i understand one and there is already a camp in the information war, we want a defeat of putin, we want

i will lead the victory of ukraine. ukraine will definitely be, but what will putin's defeat be? this is a real question that no one is asking today. an honest analyst cannot give an exact answer. actually i'm sorry too would have added the rating of your programs, but i'm afraid that it would damage our reputation very much . thank you for this, mrs. yakovenko. tell me, please, consider the anti-russian

western sanctions. they are seriously hitting the economy of russia, but they are, uh, well, for the foreseeable period, well, let’s say so, ah, so they are definitely hitting, they are reducing uh, the military potential of russia, but first of all, in a non-catastrophic way secondly, i think that uh, this is uh, that moment when, as a result of sanctions, so to speak, russia will stop fighting, it is uh, significantly longer . there is actually a resource of the economic resources of russia , there are quite a lot of rumors that as a result of the sanctions, that is, the sanctions are necessary, the sanctions are necessary, it says that the sanctions are up, the sanctions, uh, so many sanctions are just being done. nonsense

in the framework of these sanctions, to what extent are they accepted, well, automatic mechanical western bureaucracy works quite clumsily , that is, it was possible to make sanctions more effective, but no sanctions will collapse quickly, well, as quickly as we would like, the economic mechanism of russian russia will not collapse as before eh can produce deadly weapons russia can still produce eh murders in large numbers and sanctions - they can't stop it a-but the political process, that is, it has its own kind to say that there is no problem in the armed forces themselves, which in general, in the near future, it is necessary to die, and it is absolutely pointless

, and that is to say, the future leadership is led by an absolutely incompetent leadership what do all of this mean and the complete idiocy of putin and the er shaygovka as the leaders of the er military operation by war? and he is quite obvious. here you are now showing how much i understand putin in this very command center where he sat with a sad look and asked will depict from the commander-in-chief himself said a lot of stupid things, as well as at the extended meeting of the military colleague, which means the ministry of defense, that is, it was just a firework, stupid things that putin and putin spoke, and in general, that's all. they understand and everyone understands that the number of victims is simply national military incompetence in the leadership. i think that the general staff, which was initially against this war, has already grown a big tooth against putin , and the number of people who are now

dying means and lie in the ukrainian chernozem among russian military personnel, there are already over 100,000, and in general, this too , so to speak, creates discontent in the army. i think that this is the ukrainian syndrome, which is similar to the german syndrome when russian russian soldiers climbed out of the trenches in the first world war the wars came out and staged the october coup, including. i think that we will see this to some extent . также i think that the higher ones are the most there , everything has already boiled because from the very beginning you already remember the beginning of this war when the generals, your former general staff and

colonel of gifts wrote open texts saying that this is a war and complete childishness cannot be fought at all peace, and this is certainly not their personal opinion. i just know both of them well, and i perfectly understand that these are people who are not in a position to write. from themselves, these are absolutely systemic people , these are imperials, uh, so say, absolutely so say imperial people, and they certainly expressed the interests of the general staff of mistress yakovenko. please tell me whether putin wants to annex belarus to russia, or is he simply using belarus, its territory, and lukashenko for his own purposes, and will continue to use it. he will not annex it, of course. и дальше установить выпоросы

er -e accession not accession well and first even his involvement of the belarusian army passively in the war with against ukraine is a question of the degree of resistance lukashenko asks lukashenko actively opposes this and for now lukashenko's resources are revealed. it's not strange for the elders to slip away from these things. here's putin's embrace. interestingly, in st. petersburg right now , putin is holding an informal summit of the heads of state of the sna , and there is still influence on this state. челом well, i think that the servants as a whole are the phantom. just like the very beginning , the phantom was the phantom. means the supreme soviet of the ussr passed passed the resolution about rostov of the soviet union is exactly on this day, er, that in december 91 , and er, just at this time. at that moment, the cis was created. the

cis has never had any effective structures, so putin has er uh, there is practically no influence on the heads of state, uh, that's it, that's what we call the soviet space , they just don't want to mess with him , because in general, well, uh, well, why why quarrel with a crazy, uh, human being doesn't sane and everything perfectly understands that something can really bite and eh kazakhstan also has a huge, long border with russia. well, i'm not talking about belarus here. it's clear that everything here is a hostage . we can talk a lot about other republics. actually, there's no influence, seriously. well, let's say so. fear is er-er er caution but no influence of course he no longer exerts any influence

on a single country of the former er former soviet space thanks well, i have the last question for you today, what will russia be after putin, will there be russia at all after putin i think that no, i think that russia after putin will not exist, i think that er, in general, this is the long-standing historical project of russia is coming to an end, and er, after putin, russia will not er, will not exist in these borders, and it will probably be called something else. well, even if it will also be called then this will already be done by the second country in general in the event that it will not be preserved in these borders and putin will then go down in history as a gravedigger of russia, he owns such a person, actually speaking, he himself, in the beginning, all of this projectism it was byla the final stage of russia and russian history it and this is the war and

he greatly accelerated the final collapse of the russian empire. i think that he will enter eh. well, he will enter under many names, but one thing is the gravedigger of russia. thank you very much. it was igor yakovenko, a journalist, a teacher, a former deputy of the state duma of the russian federation , well, we finished the conversation with mr. yakovenko very well. he described the future of putin, painted the future, understood . obviously, this coincides with everything that every ukrainian expects. and i think even not only ukrainians, but also every civilized european, so that putin will go down in history as a gravedigger, i don't know how exactly in ukrainian to say gravedigger, gravedigger, no matter what, as a gravedigger of his country, which will not exist after him because he will completely destroy it, will destroy it with the actions that he started on the 24th, in fact, which he started

preparing even earlier, but so actively began to implement on february 24 of this year will fade into oblivion, he will fade into oblivion this country and we will stand up, we will win this is very cool it remains for me to sum up the results of our vote. 270 people voted and gave an answer to the question that i asked, will russia absorb belarus? 66% think that it will absorb, uh, 27% think that it will not absorb, 7% think of their own option, but i will tell you personally if you are interested in something, it seems to me like this as mr. yakovenko said, i will not be absorbed into those 27%, because lukashenko will try to the last a -------------------------------- why was she looking at us? now 1070 people are watching, at least the channel that is dedicated specifically for our program

for the world during the war. well, i also want to remind those who will still watch it that if you like this program, please put your favorites, if you don't like it, put your dislikes and in any case write something in the comments it is very important for us to understand you and it is very important for the promotion of our program in the complex algorithm of youtube which i do not understand but which is which somehow works and please help us so that our the program in this algorithm worked. well, for today, my name is yuri fizer, see you, cinema, television, sport , music, education, free people have a choice, choose what you want on megogo, christmas is a time when ordinary things

acquire miraculous properties, a time to gather together to celebrate and we will decorate our christmas trees even in times of war, our christmas trees will become places of strength, we will meet christmas together with our military, all together we will become even stronger, and as in carols, light defeats darkness, so in life, ukrainians will defeat moscow's zayah, look with a sincere eye to god's son, to our land, to ukraine , a gift came down from heaven, so that it may be glorified in the eternal ages. merry christmas. watch this week 's program of collaborators, a list of miklushkas, hundreds of traitors from all over the country, what did the traitors

exchange the motherland for, the head of the occupation administration, and what punishment do the lackeys of the kremlin receive in the ukrainian earth watch every wednesday at 4:45 p.m. the best of the cycle, collaborators , the list of mitluzhkas on the espresso tv channel, the war raised its head again in europe, reminding us of the darkest hours of our history franz 24 constantly covers events in ukraine, our team on the ground and in the studio will inform you about the dynamics of events and this most current from franz 24 in ukrainian on espresso