in the field of defense and military in the field of military defense, which investigates, rather, carries out the procedural management of the investigation of all these crimes, they are part of this body, they worked and are working now, too, but the question is that the question regarding this law in our situation is ruban, probably most likely at the request of the commanders yes, here too the situation is such that there is definitely a need i do not say in this law i say that i definitely the need to regulate these legal relations or these social relations is special by the corresponding law, that is, there is probably most likely no well no, there is such a thing, let’s say yes, and evasion of service is such and a rather harsh attitude towards the commanders, and non-conscription is there, and all the same, all these other issues that may arise during service, especially during front-line service, and that is why

we we also saw the reaction to this law. we saw the reaction of the commander-in-chief valery zaluzhnyi to this law, yes, who supports this law, but here the situation is such that the law itself, yes, needs to be refined from the point of view of its compliance with the principle of law, because by and large there is a bracket, there are many things that do not exactly correspond to the principles of the principles of the ratio of the severity of misdemeanors and the severity of punishment because, in principle, not serious enough misdemeanors from the point of view of criminal law have a sufficiently serious punishment well, of course, this is a state of war during martial law, but the question is because they do not have a ratio of punishment to other similar misdemeanors for which they can be punished, moreover, there is a dual jurisdiction there, both administrative and criminal, and therefore, in

principle, this law needs exactly finalization perhaps it is not needed, it is possible and the strengthening of responsibility for war crimes, scientists, well, it was well, in the time of hostilities, during hostilities, harsher punishments are needed, but they must be absolutely in relation to other principles and norms of law that exist today in criminal law codes well, the key issue of justice is the establishment of justice, not only the qualification of certain mechanisms of punishment oleg synyutka do you know this bill because it is still which did not become law before the president's signature has its pros and cons, and i remember this day of voting, in the first reading we unequivocally supported this draft decision and voted for it, but we asked then, including the chief of the general staff, general

sheptal, the hero of ukraine, who represented let's finalize this draft law in a few days , then there were arguments that it was necessary immediately and it should not be delayed even for a minute, but look at the session when this draft bill was voted on and until yesterday, when the verkhovna rada reconvened, there was enough time, and during this time we see that the president has not signed this draft law. i am convinced that it would be correct then to vote in the first reading and to finalize the norms that caused the discussion by yesterday, because the fact that both the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine , general zaluzhnyi, and the fact that the chief of the general staff, general sheptala, supported this draft law and publicly spoke out, indicates that the command of the

armed forces of ukraine, in which there is 100% trust sees the need to review regulatory documents and legislative documents, but on the other hand, why was there such a rush if this bill has not been signed by today? i think it was a certain mistake that from that day of the vote until yesterday, it turns out that there is time to finalize it this draft law , therefore, today the president of ukraine and the supreme commander-in-chief must make a decision whether, in his opinion, this draft law still needs to be revised. i am convinced that parliamentarians will meet immediately in order to finalize and support whether he will consider that this draft law should be signed in this form and put his signature and this draft law will become the law of ukraine i still think that the decision was too hasty

and i am still convinced that the time during which this draft law is so and did not become a law , it could be used to improve and you agree with mr. viktor to finalize those norms that today need to be finalized because they have arguments and the leaders of the commanders of the military units that today they talk about the need for such a bill, but they have arguments and those ukrainian soldiers who say that certain norms of this bill are imperfect, that's why they didn't listen to the arguments of those people who asked to finalize this bill very quickly, but very professionally and qualitatively. thank you , viktor is in touch with us chumak, major-general of justice of the reserve, former chief military prosecutor of ukraine in the 19-20s p viktor, in your opinion , what mechanisms should be

implemented or prescribed in this law now for in order to somewhat civilize, so to speak , an extremely harsh attitude in the qualifications of certain military personnel. i don't know of misdemeanors or these or that. maybe even crimes. look, i'm not going to talk about specific sanctions right now, and which ones should be changed or not changed. yes, by and large, i i think that if the president makes a decision to apply the veto to this law, then it is really necessary to look into it so that the sanctions for the corresponding crimes, which are the corresponding war crimes, are not more severe than, well, let's say, much more severe than the sanctions for similar crimes, which civilians commit there yes, so that there was some kind of comparison, although it is possible and to wish that it is, well, let's say that there are factors that can increase the punishment, increase the responsibility of the military for committing

the same crimes there as they are being followed and the prices, but that's what i would like to say in principle that there is a certain responsibility there under article 172 of the code on administrative offenses, article 407 of the criminal code, and the situation there is practically that, by and large, the disposition of these articles has one and the same, one and the same composition an offense but in one case here in this case it will be an administrative offense, let's say there, and in the second a criminal offense, and a criminal offense that carries with it a penalty of three to seven years of imprisonment, and it goes without saying that this is impossible because it is left to the discretion of, let's say so the discretion of investigators and such other application of punishment and not clear responsibility for the law, therefore the main thing is that it is accepted that what should

be done right now requires a political decision of the president regarding the need for finalization this law needs a fast enough er, well, let's say the will of the verkhovna rada and a normal working group that could agree on all this very quickly, and practically a new version, there is the application of the veto in certain parts, and after that, we can have a version and a draft of the law earlier, it can be signed, accepted, and so on, on the one hand, it will relieve tension , relieve tension among the military, because it will also be among human rights defenders, volunteers, and so on, because it will determine that they were heard. and on the other hand, it will greatly increase requirements for military discipline in the conditions of martial law thank you, gentlemen, for the comprehensive assessment and, in principle, for the very well-written mechanism, how to prevent certain errors

that may arise, it is about the appearance of the draft law number 82-71, we were contacted by viktor chumak, a lawyer reserve major-general of justice, the former chief military prosecutor of ukraine in the 19-20s, and the people's deputy for european solidarity, oleg synyutka, worked in the studio, for which i am very grateful, gentlemen, finally, important news i want to inform you, dear tv viewers, that putin's swindle lavrov, the minister of foreign affairs, the criminal stated that russia refuses to enter into negotiations with ukraine on the basis of the peace formula proposed by president volodymyr zelensky, putting forward or i quote lavrov, putting forward various ideas and peace formulas, zelensky nurtures the illusion of achieving the withdrawal of our troops of their russian occupation from the territory of donbas, crimea, zaporozhye and kherson oblast, payment of reparations to russia, attendance at

international tribunals, etc. is clear under such conditions, we will not talk with anyone, for sure lavrov and, of course, he blames kyiv for everything, that we are not ready for dialogue, but if lavrov says that, so to speak, under these conditions, negotiations are impossible, it means that deep down, lavrov realizes that russian defeat is inevitable and now they are just trying to sell it as expensive as possible. well, more information on the espresso tv website and on the pages of our tv channel in social networks facebook telegram youtube twitter and instagram and now i will pass the floor to our colleagues and you will be working with the court reporter and tatyana shustrova. watch this week 's judicial control program with tatyana shustrova , the desperation of the year, how candidates with dubious reputations and sky-high fortunes tried to

get to the supreme council of justice, of course, an interesting question. unfortunately, this is how it happened incredible judicial talent than manipulation of the declaration who managed to buy valuable property for nothing the price is not even for yalta for yalta especially an apartment of such an area in to the resort town of gurzu and a master class on changing shoes in flight, why are those who criticized the judicial reform trying to get to the highest bodies of judicial power? congratulations, this is judicial control, and i am tetyana shustrova together with the team. i congratulate you on christmas and new year's holidays. do we believe in the victory of our armed forces or do i courage and resilience impresses the whole world, and you, who for almost six months, have been following the judicial reform that is taking place in ukraine and is one of the key requirements for

our entry into the european union this year the competition for the supreme council of justice has ended, the selection for the higher qualification commission of judges has begun, a number of important laws have been passed, and the corrupt kyiv district administrative court has finally been liquidated, summing up the results of the year let's remember those desperate representatives of the old system who tried with all their might to disrupt important transformations for ukraine, trying to get to the updated ones judicial authorities and fortunately they did not succeed. for your attention, a digest of the judicial control program with the most interesting episodes of 2022 on august 17 the interview was held by the head of the kharkiv appeals administrative court, gennady borshov, in 2017 he already tried to become

a judge of the supreme court, and the higher qualification commission of judges recognized him as unscrupulous, and why then, in particular, questions arose about the judge's opaque wealth and property of dubious origin, for example, bershoff claimed that the land cruiser worth more than a million hryvnias , which he uses supposedly belongs to his mother, who had no official income or even a driver's license, but according to vryshova worked for 30 years in a harmful industry to afford an expensive car and, according to the declaration, to give her beloved son uah 850,000 in real estate in cash, according to bersha, the family was provided by his wife, first she bought an apartment in the center of kharkiv, then an apartment in yalta. the public integrity council

emphasizes the value indicated in the declaration the real estate is undervalued by at least a third of the market value, which may indicate deliberate manipulation. he has been living in a house for several years, which he does not put into operation does not officially register and indicates it only as an unfinished construction in the declarations since 2016 he had an apartment in yalta with an area of ​​52 m², which was purchased in october 2013, he indicates that it cost only uah 149,000, this is a ridiculous price, not even for yalta, for yalta moreover, an apartment of such an area in the resort town of gurzu, and during the interview he gave such a very funny explanation about the fact that they agreed with the buyer and the seller for such a price, the business wife who allowed the purchase of expensive

real estate is very secret, because even he himself in 2017, gennadiy borshov did not know what she was doing, we called the candidate for membership in the supreme council of justice to ask if he remembered who his wife works for, mr. gennadiy. congratulations, this is a judicial control program on the espresso tv channel. we have a few questions for you. how did your interview go? candidates for vrp have asked you questions about your wife's business, but you mentioned how your wife does business . by journalists, but the question is who doesn't call you, and that's why i can't comment . thank you very much. in 2017, the higher qualification commission of judges of ukraine recognized hennadiy barshov as an unscrupulous

judge of the supreme court. justice is marina the cook, she is a judge of the kharkiv district administrative court and wants to be a member of the supreme council of justice, however, her judicial career has very ambiguous episodes. for example, years in a row, marina is a cook and indicated in the declaration the apartment of 130 square meters in kharkiv, in which she lived until she suddenly became its owner. she did not buy it. she inherited it. how exactly did she manage to turn it around and to which family connections made her the heir? it is unknown, however, the story is too similar to manipulation with the declaration of wealth , presumably in this way, marina kuhar could

hide the real value of the apartment, which she most likely simply bought. but this is not the only case when marina kuhar has a relationship with dubious real estate. the kharkiv judge was co-owner of the prestige cooperative under the so -called cooperative scheme of kernes dobkin, the cooperative received an elite plot of land in kharkiv for free next to the sarzhen ravine, and later it was transferred to private individuals, this may indicate the involvement of the candidate cook in the theft of communal property according to the anti-corruption center, marina's father, the cook , has a joint business with former people's deputy from the opposition bloc dmytro shentsev, whom russian president putin awarded the medal for his great contribution to the preservation and popularization of of the russian language and culture abroad, as well as with businessman volodymyr levchenko

, he is a co-owner of the company that received more than uah 50 million for the construction of the wall project on the border with the russian federation, right now we can assess its reliability . before that, he headed the kharkiv commercial court of appeal, local changes once connected him with raiding, ties to criminality and the discrepancy between the lifestyle and official income of judges the career and biography of the candidate for the supreme council of justice, maryna kuhar, is far from flawless. at the end of august, the ethics council conducted an interview with her, the official results are currently unknown. so we decided to ask how marina kuhar herself assesses her integrity and the likelihood of becoming a member of the vrp, and called her. congratulations, ms. marina

this is the judicial control program on the espresso tv channel, we have a few questions for you. how was the interview as a candidate for the vrp and do you consider yourself a virtuous candidate? why is it commenting on judicial control or did you not know that this is a tv program on the espresso tv channel, don't you see the reputational risks due to family ties with persons associated with pro-russian political forces i don't want i don't want and i won't this is the conversation we had with the candidate for the highest judicial authority, unfortunately even with the beginning war and which forced citizens to reassess a lot of things, the audacious corrupt ladies connected with russian deputies, instead of sitting at home in their undeclared apartments, continue to push themselves into power where they

obviously do not belong and do not want to understand that as it once was, it will no longer be so. bohdan monich, chairman of the council of judges of ukraine, a judge of the seventh appeals administrative court . he is one of the most active blockers of judicial reform. recently blocked the ethics council. now he is going to her for an interview. i wonder what he hopes for. galina chizyk, an expert at the anti-corruption center, does not hide her indignation. it is disgusting to watch how monyach who spoke about the fact that the ethical council is not constitutional, the participation of international experts in this is not constitutional, he is now going to participate in the competition, we assume that bohdan monich

forgot that he is against the judicial reform , which he now wants to be a part of but we have not forgotten about his bright past, monich headed the council of judges in 2019, district administrative court judge pavlo vovk, yanukovych-era official andriy portnov and the then head of the presidential administration andriy bohdan deposed the head of the council oleg tkachuk and replaced him with the convenient bohdan monich this was recorded on the so-called vovka tapes made public by our colleagues from the investigation.info of russia. the issues of the due general public could not be managed by the prime minister and so on. monyach followed orders

and did not touch the district administrative court. he publicly defended him and criticized the presidential bill on the liquidation of oasco. he is obviously dependent on the judicial clans of influential judges , such as pavlo vovk, the chairman of the district administrative court, and bohdan romanich got his position as the head of the council of judges thanks to pavlo vovk it is obvious that he is acting in accordance with the instructions he receives from the head of the os , pavel vovka, there and from other leaders of the judicial mafia. with the beginning of the full-scale invasion of russia, bohdan monich did not lose his enthusiasm in the fight against judicial reform and independent judicial bodies, taking advantage of the war he tried remove the ethics council from the evaluation of candidates that the council of justice, in particular, demanded

to transfer this function to the council of judges headed by him, the judicial mafia simply decided to use the war in order for such to try to remove the ethics council from the reform of the supreme council of justice, that is, again, to ensure that the right people get to the supreme council of justice, in april of this year, there were meetings on the basis of the committee on legal policy of the verkhovna rada, japan, or there he commented on various initiatives advocating for actually transferring the powers of selection and possibly even election during martial law is the joy of judges, that is, even a congress of judges would not have to be convened by a council of judges headed by language, should they choose new members of the supreme council of justice on their own, because supposedly the war will write off everything? bohdan monich's family owns three

plots of land, a 330 -square-meter house near zhytomyr, and several apartments in vinnytsia and zhytomyr. it should be noted that monich also has a special judicial superpower to buy real estate at a price in several times lower than the market value, so according to the declaration, a house with more than 300 square meters is worth $19,000, and an apartment in zhytomyr is only $1,900. very similar to banal manipulations and attempts to hide real wealth bohdan monyacha 's mother loves her son so much that over the course of several years she gave him more than half a million hryvnias, although her official income in those years was slightly more than 32,000 hryvnias, this is the

head of the kivertsi district court of the volyn region, viktoriya koretska prefers to become a member of the supreme council of justice and considers herself worthy of this position. she is very self-confident, considering her biography. in 2019 , the judge was evaluated by the higher qualification commission. her interview was so unsuccessful that the commission took a break , which continues to this day. some episodes deserve special attention. why did you sell? yes , of course, an interesting question. unfortunately, this happened and some time passed . viktoriya

koretska not only makes, as she says, ill-considered decisions, but also forgets something, for example, for several years in a row, to indicate in the declarations the car they use. well, you start declaring this car only in the 16th year, at that time, on the 14th and 15th, the crossing of the border was recorded, for example , by you personally in this car, i probably didn't think about it either, and forgot several times to indicate in the declarations the land plots that she owns together with her husband, oleg koretsky, the prosecutor of the general prosecutor's office , and in general, to inquire where does her husband live regarding residence? well, he does not give me any information, i have asked you several times. he claims that i live with an acquaintance of friends and does not rent an apartment due to the fact that i do not have enough funds to rent an official he has enough of an apartment friends well, really

enough of friends he has been working for the general office for not the first year here just without commenting on friends for example we believe the more the judge honestly told how koretsky’s work at the prosecutor general’s office helped koretsky in this probably once it was friends who also helped koretsky’s husband to the lubomlsky inter-district prosecutor of the volyn region during yanukovych's time, instead of lustration, to get a promotion in 2016, the father of judge victoria korytska, a pensioner , bought a house of almost 200 m², in a beautiful in a cottage town, according to the judicial tradition , he bought it for 1 million hryvnias, although the market value of the same house without repairs from the developer started at two million

. he does not know that this house was purchased by my father, he is engaged in entrepreneurial activities, he is a pensioner, the imf gel for pensioners was paid on a single tax when i applied to provide information he refused to give me a notarized statement that he refuses to provide and disclose any information about his business activities, according to the dure foundation, the judge is known for exempting drunk drivers from punishment . in 2019, she helped a driver who, while in a state of alcohol intoxication, hit a cyclist to death. koretska sentenced him to 5 years, but released him from punishment and did not even deprive him of his driver's license . one in which

the person who did not just commit the offense of drunk driving but simply hit the man to death and the sky bore no responsibility and it is obvious that such judges not only cannot a-a participate and determine who should be as judges who no what actually belongs to the competence of the supreme council of justice a and in principle, we should not be judges, we called victoria koretsky to give information about the origin of wealth , their non-declaration and smearing of drunk drivers hello i congratulate you ms. victoria is the judicial control program on the espresso tv channel, we have a few questions for you. please tell me why you keep forgetting to indicate property in the declarations, for example, cars or land plots later, what did they call to talk about i don't have

time to call you now and the final digest of the judicial control program with the most interesting episodes of 2022 the candidates you saw fortunately no longer participate in the competition for the high council of justice, however, they still have high powers as judges despite a very dubious reputation, large fortunes of an unknown the origin and large number of disciplinary proceedings regarding judicial decisions for them as well as for judicial reform in general. we will continue to monitor and in the new year, may 2023 bring us victory and much happiness. we will meet in exactly one week