it is official moscow and official kyiv that we are talking about china. this country is so far neutral, although we would like them to loudly and officially express their position. regarding this war, the us secretary of state anthony blin talked with the minister of foreign affairs of china. this conversation was purely diplomatic in nature, formal in nature or was it productive and what main statements did blinken make after this communication in general? relations with hothouse russia, of course, the chinese also understand this, and the very fact that linkin went there, the very fact that the talks took place is already a positive signal, or don’t forget that these talks took place on the initiative of not only the

american side. at the same time , the chinese themselves agreed to them. that the chinese have already begun, if not sooner, at least now to play a double game, they are on the one side . of course, they continue to support russia, they must still have a kind of union there, brotherly love between them, brotherly peoples, and so on, but at the same time, they fully understand that what russia is doing to ukraine now is not in their interest, but in the interests of the stability of eurasia itself. and here we must remember that the very fact that china will agree to be neutral towards russia is already a clear huge victory, where do you remember ukraine? it was in january, in february of this last year, when putin would go to a jing, and there was generally such a thing

. then his relationship to the war, and even more so to russia itself, we see that there is such a deep love there is no one who understood because the chinese are such a whim they know that their strength, their power and their influence depends mainly on the type of economic stability and on their ability to offer markets of the world and thus to them a war, any war , especially a war of diodes, which ends with the victory of ukraine, is generally not beneficial , so the americans know it, the chinese know it, i can imagine what continues these conversations and you can too and it is quite easy to imagine that in a few months, if the crisis from the point of view of russia

deepens, if further battles on the battlefield are prognosticated, which is sooner or later, china can completely renounce its alliance with russia, this is what happens this means that this is a completely typical behavior of different countries, and even more so of the chinese, who, as i said, are pragmatic, they are especially ideological in their attitude towards russia. thank you, mr. oleksandr, for the analysis and behavior of china and not only the behavior of our of partners in the transfer of weapons thank you oleksandr motyla, american historian, professor of political science at rudhars university in newark, new jersey, was on a live video link another drone attack on ukraine, the largest attack drones, the aggressor country headed for kyiv and the shaheda region, targeted critical infrastructure objects, reports kyivska the regional military administration shot down 20 air targets in the sky above the capital

, the city military administration notes that oleksiy brychenko is now in direct contact with us from executive director of the international association of small communities, mr. buryachenko, we wish you a good night, olena mykyta. i congratulate you and, of course, all our viewers. focus on air alarms, the capital itself is the second day in a row becoming the number one target for russian barrage munitions, rockets , e-e, and just for the duration of more than four hours that yesterday on new year's eve that today, mr. oleksiy, why is it kiev that is trying to give nightmares to the kremlin for two days in a row, considering that in 313 days of a

full-scale invasion and in three months of autumn, when ukrainian cities and the capital began to be intensively shelled in the same number, well, this did not lead to mass panic extended blackouts there for months, and so on, what was expected in the kremlin, but what did not happen. why do they continue to do so, stupid fools? sorry for these words, but to put pressure on the same ones. don't even step on the same rakes, friends, i can only say probably two words - it's some er not justified anger and that weakness on the part of the occupiers the invaders russians er yes indeed even now there literally an air alarm ended an hour ago in kyiv on a and so the whole country including in kyiv in i'm there right now, new year's eve, under the fact that my family and i all gathered at and heard

about the work in above kyiv. by the way , the huge mshana. thank you very much for their work. they shot down rockets, they shot down shaheds. everyone beat it, but you don't know about me there are no such deep questions, let's say, why this is happening in russians, because when we compare, we listened to our president on volodymyr zelensky yes with his extremely strong i even called the historical program a landmark speech yes to the speech that united us all on the speech that showed us these terrible pictures of the war but the most important thing is that this speech actually showed us the future showed us the achievements you are now talking about the speech i think

for the sake of justice it will remind the audience who suddenly did not see this address and the greeting of the president, how did everything happen, if you don't mind, let's continue the conversation, this year's address of the president did not leave the majority of ukrainians indifferent, i confess, i , like the rest of the ukrainians, watched him with tears in my eyes. to the new year, and with piercing and polite words, our greatest common dream is victory in this war. it must finally end with our unconditional victory and this is what zelensky wished on the verge of the turn of the year. thanked for the indomitability of each region of ukraine and most importantly what we are fighting for people for our people who have to return home so that there is no let this year be the year of the return of the return of our people warriors to their families captives to their

homes immigrants to their ukraine return of our lands and temporary occupations will become forever free , a return to normal life, then happy moments without a curfew, to earthly joys without aerial anxieties, the return of what was stolen from us, the childhood of our children a peaceful old age to our parents, mr. oleksiy, who promised a piece of congratulatory address of the president of ukraine on new year's eve, tell us what your reaction was, what was the most important thing for yourself , you know, from this speech, it is extremely uh-uh, i used to say a sensitive and sensitive speech, yes, and all of ukraine in this moment, we were together and it was not just the president who was speaking, as far

as i was concerned, but it was the leader of the nation, yes, that's why, and probably not only ukraine, probably the leader of the entire civilized world , but i personally noted for myself that he did not once he said about the de-occupation of the territory and the release of people. he clearly named donbass and luhansk region and the crimea, and several times in his speech, he also sounded melitopol, which, in my opinion, is the key to de-occupation, that is, in fact, about the historical borders of 1991. but he spoke more about in contrast to putin, by the way, or what i wanted to say before turning it on. he spoke about the future, and that is of course important. he spoke about renewal. he spoke about rebirth. he said that we are becoming stronger. we said that this year was extremely difficult and probably

the next one will not be easier, but we are definitely not afraid of shaheds or rockets, we don't have that fear anymore. maybe at the first stage. who listened in contrast to zelensky ’s address, putin’s address, and here everything is clear to them. during his speech, putin said one thing that was clear to them: go and die . it is unclear what is unclear. for what imperial goals and ambitions in putin’s speech, we heard about some incomprehensible from the insult, we heard the absolute inadequacy, and when he was against the background of these sober people, already on the internet they identified this woman who was at several performances, really, i don’t have

the feeling that putin is will congratulate the russians next year, it seems to me that this is already the last such swan song and soon there will be a swan lake in fact, there is no feeling that putin will stay for a long time because this is completely inadequate he was talking about the past he was talking about the fact that the russians must die absolutely without a purpose, and therefore of course the difference is absolutely infuriating . which say absolutely true things about what ukraine fought so hard for this year both in the euro and integration and

in the eu and nato members in order to become an aspiration for vot and actually reborn in relations with the western world, the western world really probably opened ukraine for this world , not for this year, so it would be appropriate to note that not only the event opened ukraine, but also the ukrainians themselves opened the president, i will explain why after his statement, zelenskyi’s greetings were divided into quotes, if you look at the public, the reaction was simply shocking, and those who in their time criticized the president for last year's new year's speech yes. on new year's eve they talked about the fact that now they respect him because he really did something that united the nation, do you agree with that? i absolutely agree and i can be heard, and i even i will say my personal point of view more subjectively. well, when volodymyr zelenskyi

first came to power, the people elected the president, and this and this volodymyr zelenskyi, who addressed us yesterday with a speech, and these are completely different people, because it was clear that he had no political experience something , he was not systematic, he was such a politician, let's say even an anti-politician. and now we see that this is really a person who was not afraid , who did not run away, who, together with each of us, defends his land, it is clear that he has experienced, reconsidered, and i am deeply convinced who made a huge number of conclusions for himself not only for these 10 more than 10 months of the war, but also for the entire half of the period that he was already the president of ukraine, therefore, in fact, this is a rebirth not only of ukraine, not only ukrainians, but not only of each of us

, the rebirth took place he is also very serious, mr. oleksiyovych, what the president said, what you focused on, yes, the return to our borders, so that the general staff assembly appears like this, the figure that we all want to see about the length of our border and about the territory of our country, but for this, what do we need, and we repeatedly emphasized on this, yes, last year , you can already say that . add to the broadcast, but this is an american historian and professor of political science, he, emphasizing that he is an optimist, says that this year, and in the coming weeks, maybe months, uh, we will get the tanks we need, the planes we need, we didn't have time we will ask the truth about the attack, but even following his logic, we are probably getting, or do you see, already in this year 2023, according to the statements

of our international partners, the prerequisites for us to receive what we did not receive last year, long-range, even longer -range projectiles e- it is even more precisely armored vehicles in the form of tanks, not only battleships and airplanes, and i share the position of the expert you are talking about, even i am actually even more optimistic than him, and because if you take into account the statements of gsman, if you take into account the statements of the anti-putin coalition in rammstein if the statements are taken into account by biden's statements. on the consequences of the hysterical visit without exaggeration to the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi in the usa and there very clearly. by the way , it was said that ukraine will receive 100% of everything that will be needed for ukraine to win. that is why, and even earlier, there

was information in some public places about the planes on yes, i don’t know what kind of planes they will be, but most likely they will be mussels, which we have been talking about with you for a very long time on tv, but i am deeply convinced that we are getting tanks and armored vehicles, and it is necessary to pay attention to the condition of the analysis - pay attention to the analysis of biden's speech, remember that in it he noted that the country of the anti-putin coalition is already ready to provide about two thousand tanks and 700 units of armored vehicles yes, that is, in principle, it is er and already and already promised a huge huge amount of uh- huh corresponding hu-hu shells both for the rssu and, accordingly, for the artillery in this huge aid, now the last one is two billion dollars, that is, ukraine,

as far as i’m concerned, really gets everything he needs victory for you and the western trail will be with us in accordance with our victory, these are not just empty words, and maybe as there were a few years ago, this is an absolutely concrete plan of action, because europe and the world have already understood that they are simply handing over weapons in turn the necessary weapons for ukraine from warehouses somewhere will be possible, and it is not enough because they are examining their reserves, so to speak, they already understand that it is necessary to produce new weapons specifically for ukraine, specifically to help ukraine , and it was precisely at the last nato summit that a hysterical decision was made. what was the order from the natis countries for weapons for ukraine, which is not currently a nato member country, that is, it is already fully

operational ? that the 23rd year will be victorious and many factors will contribute to this. thank you for joining us at this late hour. oleksiy buryachenko, executive director of the international association of small communities, has just been in touch with us in particular, they talked about the greetings of the president of ukraine to ukrainians on new year's eve, now we will talk about prospects ukraine expects to achieve practical steps in european integration during the swedish presidency of the council of the eu, president volodymyr zelenskyi said this here it is worth noting that sweden's presidency officially began at midnight on january 1 stockholm announced in advance that the priority of the work is the consequences of russia's war against ukraine, and as you know, the period of the presidency of the council of the european union lasts six months, after which sweden will be replaced by a missile attack on spain ukrainian cities of russia shows the

need to expel its betrayal of the un security council. this was stated by the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, dmytro koleba, because this is another proof that russian aggression is aimed primarily at civilians, this time a massive missile attack by russia is deliberately aimed at residential areas, not at our energy infrastructure war criminal putin celebrates the new year by killing people russia should be expelled from the seat in the un security council that it has always occupied illegally dmytro kuleba minister of foreign affairs of ukraine on twitter now we will evaluate this prospect, including oleksandr matsuka, who is in direct contact with us, he is a ukrainian diplomat at the un, he was the head of the secretariat of the united nations security council, our greetings to you . good evening, mr. oleksandr. please tell me how today we can evaluate the prospect of excluding russia from the security council is excluded there for the permanent exclusion of the temporary there they say about different options, but how do you assess this

prospect today and it depends on us now for everything it depends on us on ukrainian diplomacy on ukrainian leadership, we have now mentioned the statement of the minister of foreign affairs regarding this absolutely barbaric shelling of ukrainian cities on new year's eve, and you know, i am a little stressed by the fact that this was done on twitter, and to whom is this statement addressed, this statement is expressly in twitter , that is, this is actually said for your followers and the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine through me, er, for some reason, we did not convene an er,

urgent meeting of the un security council. security council condemned this, we do not require the secretary general to come to the security council and explain why he still hasn't sent a mission to investigate iranian drones in ukraine because, well, it was about that and then and then for some reason uh, he uh, she put it on pause, which means that we should, maybe, we should have called a safe person to a meeting and publicly asked him and where is this mission, and why not, so that he didn't tell people that he didn't want uh to it was investigated, that is, you understand, we are talking about what russia needs to expel her from there to limit her opportunities

to do something in the un, we are talking about the fact that it is necessary to expel her from there in general, i clapped my hands for and everyone is for and everyone understands that this is this, this was right, but for this certain actions are needed, if these actions are not taken, we will not take them, if we talk to twitter , then oleksandra, let me immediately put three dots here, if you look at the current un charter, expel a permanent member of the un security council without his consent, it is impossible even to suspend his participation, it is also impossible without his participation is a kind of paradox and a closed circle, how to break it, it is not a paradox, it is a fuse, which is the very states that we are talking about, that there is no need, there is no need to make statements that russia needs to change security betrayals, because the professionals know very well that

this is unrealistic, that is why that they don't have a mechanism if they don't want to, so there are two two ways, the first way is hard and complicated, it's to exclude russia from the organization of the united nations, and there is a certain mechanism, but it's a very difficult and complicated way, and the second option is to ask the question now about the non-recognition of the powers of the russian delegation of the russian federation, it says that it automatically excludes it, that is, it does not allow it to participate in the work of un bodies, and here we need to have a coalition in order for it to work in a complex, do we have one? and there is no such coalition because it is this very, very serious issue and very difficult for many states, and that is why we need to work with the states , we need to and uh, that's why we need to work in the capitals , we need to work uh, very very well, every day

we need to work no no no no no from uh events to events. and it is necessary to work purposefully every day at the highest level where only we can explain why it is necessary to use resources not only our own. to all capitals, oleksandr, a member of the organization, or only to those capitals that are members of the un security council, because the decision and exclusion from the organization in the end will be 2/3, you will have to recruit assemblies and about the non-recognition of powers will be 2/3 that's why we need to talk exactly

who will be who will, it's easier to talk to everyone, including those who are still sitting on the so-called fence and consider themselves neutral and do not want to be associated with anything recognition of the fact that russia was illegally occupying a place there so in to the members of the un security council, wouldn't this be a reputational blow to the organization, agreed there, i don't know here, well, they did such a stupid thing. how is it? this is the first moment and the second moment - this, in theory, will not become a precedent for the exclusion of a country from the organization's security councils or not, because it is there conditionally unofficial illegally stayed well, there is a problem here because when we start talking about the fact that russia was not legally in the u.s. from 1991 to 1992, then we...

in the whole world that you, you all knew this and you were silent and you allowed it to happen, that is, for many of our allies, we will put them in a very uncomfortable situation, they will be very uncomfortable talking about it because, well, they will turn to the bottom where were you where is all this time, because i need to ask a question place not so much about this, you know it as an additional argument should be used, the main issue is that the russian federation has violated all the rules and principles of this organization. that is, it is not a peaceful state. it is an aggressor state that has already violated all the rules. conventions that exist, they violated everything. therefore, it is necessary to say that this state, in principle, cannot be a member of the organization

, it does not support them in principle, this is a state that lives and does this despite such principles as approved in the un charter oleksandr, they probably heard about the initiative of the president's office in february to hold a peace summit with the participation of representatives of the united nations. in your opinion, this platform can be a starting point for starting the process of excluding russia from the un security council and doing what you said about looking for a coalition of partners in to this question in february, it means that it is now a holiday, everyone wants a job. it is possible to lead with whom constitutional partners, partners can be led, i will tell you such a thing, uh, uh, uh , prepare any of them yourself in two months it is impossible to prepare quickly

, because it is necessary to prepare, and the position must be prepared, partners must be prepared, documents must be prepared, i don’t see it, it is impossible to do until february, what to do, and we set ourselves some strange, very, very strict deadlines in which one in which we won't no no no won't be able to do this, that is, as i see it in the secretary and he and among the oniv delegation, there is a lot of skepticism , you even understand the problem is that there is skepticism not not about that - is it possible to do it and about whether it can be done in these that is, we shift the focus ourselves to the technical things, oleksandr, but it was very

important to hear yours. we thank you for joining the broadcast. we will remind the viewers of oleksandr matsuka, a ukrainian diplomat at the un , who was the head of the un security council secretariat. thank you for being with us. i will remind you that we talked about the prospects of excluding russia from the un security council, we are moving on, the only news marathon continues, and right on the course we will have a discussion of the operational situation at the front, including the holy one, you have to meet guests that no one invited on these holidays, the lights that shine on you do not want garlands instead of a bounty, explosions instead of shots of champagne, shots, but on these holidays we are still together, because every day you

give us the most valuable gifts of life and freedom, and we have one new year's wish: victory, our soldiers, thank you congratulations , when the enemy cannot achieve results on the battlefield, he resorts to cynical attacks on civilians, the russian invaders want to exhaust us, break us and divide us, this is the last chance for them, but they did not consider one in these dark times we are united like never before we are free and strong we are ready and even in the dark we see it coming