me then, oleksandr, maybe we just have to tell our european partners, please nationalize and give us money, russian business, and we won’t touch it, because it is strategically important for our economy, and we won’t touch the students, let them quietly pay their taxes , please don’t i can, although you know i can’t pretend to be an expert now in the issues of what the ministry of justice is doing at the moment, but i can draw certain historical parallels from the first world war in england then the theory of control appeared, that is, it was about those companies that were registered as an english company, but the majority of shareholders were from germany, that is, and they had a special status at that time, that is, we need to set an example for other countries. i agree with the fact that if we we appeal to

other countries with the demand to freeze and confiscate the property and funds of russian oligarchs in russia, then we must provide, we must provide the item ourselves, an example, an example, we have an example, but for now, unfortunately, we do not provide it, and let's talk after all, about the prospects of holding the e-e themselves , ukraine, the eu, the place is supposedly still being agreed upon, although earlier information was voiced that it could be kyiv, on the other hand, our partners noted that it is unlikely that it will be the ukrainian capital and the territory of our country in general, well, in any case - in any case, we understand the importance of this event, we understand how what ground have we prepared in order to conduct it qualitatively and with a certain effect, now we are talking about the

continuation of our adoption of european integration bills, this has a lot of meaning for us the importance of e-e m-m because we are talking not only about those 14 legislative initiatives that have already been considered and adopted but also in general the introduction of the law of the european union into our legislation, some laws from this category were determined by the european commission recommending to grant ukraine the status of a candidate for membership in the eu will now monitor the progress of ukraine in the implementation of these steps, and actually on the implementation . how will they be translated into certain decisions , eh, i don't know if it's correct to talk about the reform of the constitutional court as something that the european union demanded from us in the first place, but it's exactly what they expected of us even in

the middle of the term, as they say after all judicial reform, transparency, non-politicization of the relevant important state institutions , we have a repeated opinion of the venice commission and we obviously have to correct the decision that has already been made . when do you think we will be able to do this , and is work on this already underway, i know exactly what was the discussion about this remark eh and it will be included in the work of the profile committee will there be consultations and discussions, will we see each other on the mountain, er, i have no confidence in what was voted at one time there in december in the verkhovna rada . received it later and so and so and so one story tried so and so that means consultations are being conducted, but at

the moment i am sure that it has been brought out, it will be brought up permanently, the hall for voting and for changes according to these comments , mr. oleksandr, what to do with the shortcomings , cooperate, first of all, we see that now there is a very strong political will to do everything possible, and on the part of the parliament, first of all, to throw away your demands, now look at what are necessary for the earliest possible start of negotiations on joining the eu. and we have done everything that our european partners expected from us, and it is happening now process, for example, well, they express perhaps some additional attention. we try to take into account these attentions as much as possible, and this is a very normal political process, but the most important thing for us now is to achieve the result, er, to make these negotiations on joining the eu

start already this year, and we we are working on it. i am sure that we will do it. the raised topic is no less important, in fact, i don’t like it very much very few representatives of the government can answer a simple question , how long will russian business exist and work calmly in ukraine? for this we suggest you fill out the introduction form so that we can learn more about you scan the qr code get this form fill out after that you have a chance to even receive certain prize winners gifts souvenirs well not yet we know, and i at least don't know what it will be, but for

sure something interesting and definitely something so branded by espresso. we really appreciate your attention and your trust, and therefore the understanding of such a collective image of our audience is exactly the one that we put before ourselves in the near future, we will open such a dating site with our viewers. do you remember , we invite our viewers, in particular , to join us and on the youtube platform, to support, in particular, all kinds of personal thanks and personal communication yes, personal columns, all this is definitely waiting for our viewers. thank you for being with us. well, we will move on and talk now about the peculiarities of the work of media workers in war conditions. it is always a little difficult to talk about colleagues . there is probably something to criticize, nevertheless, some things are covered with

frank inflections, well, excuse me, something subjective will be said now, but that's how it is, and especially this is monitored thanks to the monitoring that is carried out, in particular, and public association detector media thanks to them for the regular publications they offer, this is a great job and it also helps us to become better with us in communication halyna petrenko director of detector media ms. halyna we congratulate you glory to ukraine glory to the heroes hello, what's up the tv channel rada in the joint marathon, the only news, launched a new section called the face of the year, and according to this idea, which is already being implemented in the blog, they show people who are bringing the victory of our country closer, and the first of these was elected the deputy chairman oleksandra kornienko of the verkhovna rada of ukraine i would not like to comment now, er, refute or er, well, let's say,

confirm something at the expense of the activities carried out by ukrainian politicians for our victory, but the face of the face of the year is very difficult and i personally was a little surprised that this for example, not someone from the military or even from our military leadership, well, this is my vision - this ukrainian politician refers to journalists, journalists or deputies who are currently protecting our country, the motherland, on the front line directly ms. galina, how is the project and its rea in general. unfortunately or fortunately, i did not see the actual broadcast with this column, i only saw screenshots from it where it was visible who was involved in me. i am very interested in why the rada channel well, in principle, the whole marathon e-e stopped uploading its content to youtube, where you could watch it after it was possible to

view the archive there for posterity or for some research purposes. well, if you didn't have time to watch it live, now you actually missed something very important i.e. they made your work more difficult. i know that you monitor this marathon, and now you have the task. now you can only view and analyze what is being taught live on the air, but not for us, because we record the broadcasts, but i am talking about myself personally, the recordings of the broadcasts our monitors who work directly on monitoring are watching, but i, as a mere natural person, do not have time to watch the entire marathon 24 hours a day, every day. well, in fact, can oleksandr kornienko, well, with all due respect, of course, as a politician, apply for me if, for example, to choose among politicians, yes , a person from the past or a face. last year, this is kostenko's novel. i don't know. maybe i'm into

him. he was directly on the front line and met the enemy even when there was the first offensive on mykolaiv on odesa and this is a photo where roman kostenko interrogates russian prisoners who were taken right there in mykolaiv by paratroopers, remember i even signed this photo that it is russian because you studied only for that's what needs to be interrogated prisoners, and this is the face of the deputy corps, which was not afraid there, went to the front and is now fighting from the first days, and when the situation around mykolaiv and his native mykolaiv region was absolutely uncertain, it could end up under occupation. roman kostenko was there with a weapon in his hands, here oleksandr kornienko well, it seems to me that a person who in this year was the opposite of the political one, there are some shadows, it seems to me that there are other politicians and other public figures and there are representatives of society, well, but he put the face of the year in fact, this choice. how do you assess it? i don't

really see any dissonance here because he can apply for it, let's say by position , we don't really know what kind of job he entered, let's say, not publicly, not politically, in order to work to the parliament here. the question is, if we are talking about any rating, obviously this program claims some kind of rating. who makes up the full list of participants, and only then can you assess whether their selection is adequate. but i saw screenshots with only two people. well, ms. galina, yes, let's skip the moment of filling , let's talk about the technology of creating such a project, uh, or what it looks like, and someone interviews these people, it's some kind of sketch, uh, well, i don't know what it can be and whether it's playing or not this is really to earn political points by creating a suitable a-a image of a

politician or a political force that he represents, is there not something in this, you know, that smells like an election campaign, i will repeat that, unfortunately, i was not lucky enough to see this column before the election campaign far, and as we understand it, it cannot begin until the war is over, and i think that the citizens of ukraine will still have enough time to evaluate all the leaders of the state and all the leaders of public opinion according to their affairs, because we are going through difficult times and you are not lying here who was doing what? well, you won't hide it, thank you, mrs. halyna. and you, i hope you had the opportunity to see diana panchenko, you know such a journalist. yes, i just know that the further subjects of the substantive discussion were like this. the security service of ukraine has started a pre-trial investigation regarding the former host of tv channels putin's godfather

medvedchuk none of you 112 zik it worked diana panchenko because of her trip to occupied donetsk and mariupol for filming, well, if the report is in english, this is a message from the security service of ukraine, how about this story , do you assess whether ukrainian journalists can travel for filming, any -what reports are now on the other side of the front line, in particular in occupied donetsk luhansk well, i think that diana panchenko, i will say that she is a ukrainian citizen. i came to ukraine. you consider donetsk to be ukrainian, right? cities in the russian federation, most likely yes, but i came to the ukrainian donetsk , in the ukrainian luhansk, i make reports about the lives of ukrainian citizens. i ask that the public presentation draw the attention of the security services, including publicly, to the fact that

diana panchenko appeared in donetsk. well, the point is that, of course, a ukrainian journalist cannot go to donetsk and work there report because he will be killed there simply by being arrested and killed, and we have data that she, uh, well, she could actually run across the front line to end up there, so that she left ukraine in august and probably went to russia, and all this time she was in of russia on the territory of our enemy, and actually donetsk was from the territory of russia. therefore, this is at least an illegal crossing of the border, but from the point of view of the media, interviewing ukrainian prisoners is also not a job in ukraine now, for ukraine, for the ukrainian people, for our interests well in fact, the irony of this situation and the way in which our first topic and the second topic are related is

that diana panchenko, in particular, worked in the field of those tv channels in which the journalists who actually worked for a longer time and who are now on the tv channel are glad but they used to be journalists ziko and they are doing it now face of the year program well, let's say that's exactly how she somehow didn't manage to get a job, she just wasn't accepted on the rada channel, that's why she decided to go work on water because the money ran out, i remember that at the beginning of a large-scale invasion it was a kind of appeal to the public and the journalistic community to react in some way to the fact that the former face of the tv channels was a bear cub. in fact, he now takes a very patriotic position. we cannot know how sincerely we work in a single marathon in single news, in your opinion. is this? well,

let's say it was a failure of last year that we, in particular, as journalists and the public, did not manage to get any official answers to why there is no dissonance in this. why the authorities do not see any dissonance in this. yes, unfortunately, our the public organization also advocated that there should be no such people in the single marathon. unfortunately, i say that because, unfortunately, we lost, we could not convince the representatives of the authorities who are responsible for this . i understand their logic. they think that or at least at the beginning they didn’t think, and then everything got involved and that these presenters had a loyal audience of pro-russian ukrainians, so if these presenters suddenly start saying something good for ukraine, then this will be able to convince that part of the citizens to join in. and in the first months of the war, yes - that's right

to start reacting to all events, to understand where the enemy is actually located, the logic was like this, but everything, like the marathon itself, acted according to the principle that there is nothing, er, somewhere so permanent as temporary, everything got on its rails and continues to exist as it exists. i am very interested when i the war will end, then the marathon will end, i hope together with her, eh, eh, well, i'm looking forward to how the war will end, yes , how long it will be able to end at one moment. is for past deeds, after all, this is a figure that seems to be quite significant , especially when you are trying to somehow collect a penny for the needs of the ukrainian army. well, it may be too populist to say so,

but such are the realities of war. here are six. almost 6 million hryvnias a two-hour concert on new year's eve in the only marathon and in fact , this proposal was presented in a transparent manner. how would you rate it in the current situation? this money was directed, i ask everyone who is responsible for the marathon, they say that it reached stable viewing figures and, in principle, the research, which is a public opinion poll, shows that ukrainians watch it in a certain amount and trust it quite highly, but i know that uh, who are those people who are responsible for the marathon. they probably work on prejudice. they work to ensure that the marathon does not lose the attention of the audience and some time ago they began to think about inserting an entertainment program into it.

the content is correct, probably no, the marathon is moving, as i said, according to the principle, there is nothing permanent but temporary, if this year it was almost not financed, then for the next year, almost 2 billion uah were allocated, which actually took a bite out of the public broadcaster . that is, these are transferred state budget funds from one of the pockets in the other a and decided in this case to dispose of what to make an entertainment program, but this does not cancel the fact that it should be considered by the highest state leaders and media managers as a temporary phenomenon, as it were for everyone adjust to the fact that the marathon should be temporary and not create some kind of permanent structure from it, to which the audience is already getting used to, i saw a public opinion poll of a very respectable organization that shows that viewers no

longer distinguish at all on which channel they watch the marathon, they actually perceive it as a separate channel is the question. but why is this marathon stable? because other channels have been cut off from broadcasting, well, this is the first question, and for example, they watch our channel because ours is not in t2, and the second the question is that i am not against a concert of a prudent person in the information marathon if this concert is made with the money of the same firtash who participates in the marathon or kolomoiskyi or the former akhmetov who seems to be now on his own these journalists, but not with my money, that is, ours and yours these six million in taxes were paid for this production of entertainment content to the supposedly purely informational marathon, for the sake of which our channel was cut off from t2, they say that a unified information policy is needed. well, i have logical questions. why do i have to pay entertainment at the joint marathon, which was created because of, not because our channel was excluded from information broadcasting t2 for the sake of this information marathon, which

actually entertains, informs, well, the logical question is because you think that news is useful content, entertainment is entertainment, but people who once won an election for the right content, then they don’t think like that, they won’t give life. thank you for this answer, it’s very appropriate. well, i would also like to note that the same channels that are involved in the production of single of news - this is not a completely homogeneous mass, uh, there are actually people who can make quality products and can even ask critical questions when it is appropriate. a very interesting topic, in fact, it concerns the e-e sanctions of our sanctions of the european union, as well as

those whom they do not affect. good day to ukraine. glory to the heroes. well, let's start with the fact that the european union is not entirely satisfied with ukraine's calls to punish european pharmaceutical companies that still work in the russian federation with sanctions. let's try to understand this story . there are things that are produced by specific producers of analogues, there may not be and this is actually a speculative thing eh please, the topic is really not easy but i will try to explain to our viewers the essence of this problem eh first of all my position as the head patient organization patients of ukraine also consists in the fact that any business, european business must leave the russian federation and the pharmaceutical business

too. i very sincerely think so a-a however, today ukrainian legislation is written in such a way that we deprive ukrainians of their own er opportunities patients to be treated with european medicines in ukraine. that is, we ukraine expels european medicines in the winter . medicines that are produced in russia or belarus . the legislation, if you dig deep, the idea is good to encourage european manufacturers to leave the market of russia and belarus. i know, i absolutely agree, and it should be like that during the war. however, as this law is currently implemented, in the end, ukrainian patients will suffer,

because they will leave the ukrainian market. those drugs that are produced in europe, that are produced in poland and romania, in other european countries, they no longer see a precedent when a decision was made regarding 35 european drugs to exit the ukrainian market so far that this mechanism has not been put into action and these drugs have not yet been released. however, we do not know at what moment it will happen. it can happen at any moment, at any moment, these are 35 drugs that will be left by ukrainian pharmacies. and that is, some drugs from this list which really do not have analogues or it is difficult to find analogues which are not produced anywhere else, or are we talking conventionally about not wanting to advertise individual drugs, but we understand that there are many things that are duplicated among themselves, different manufacturers, different

prices, and so on, in fact, the ukrainian mafia has also gained heat since the beginning of the war and can also push its competitors out of the market in order to take their places, well, i suspect that it is possible without grounds, but i have such suspicions, what would i like to do in this situation from the other side in defense of our pharmaceutical manufacturer which can offer its alternatives, but definitely do everything so that they are chosen on market terms . the ukrainian market, and the problem is that no one conducts a deep analysis, i am in the group of the ministry of health, which actually throws out drugs from the ukrainian market, and i see

how everything is arranged internally, the influence that this or that drug will leave the ukrainian market and what will be the number of analogs, what analogs will they be , or will they be in sufficient quantity , unfortunately, no one is conducting and i don't care, that's why i dug this topic deep enough and i understood that right away not about one the company in question already had a queue of 300 drugs for departure from the ukrainian market, and if we remove them, there will actually be nothing to replace them, because those analogs that remain are presented in small quantities, this will not be enough for ukrainians to be treated a we are talking about cardiovascular diseases, about type 2 diabetes, that is, it is a drug that ukrainians

take for life, and sometimes it is very difficult to choose the right manufacturer and the right dose of the drug, and if it is this drug that it was very difficult to select a patient, now it is leaving the market, in fact, a person who lives and takes it for life. this drug remains without its treatment. so who are we fighting ? this will happen, so my position is that we should first of all save and protect the ukrainian patient, such a policy cannot be implemented very thoughtlessly, and now it is being done completely without taking into account all the risks , this is a very sensitive topic and approach it you also need to be very careful, ladies, how will this story end and who do you think is responsible for solving this issue? now everything is on hold after the

national agency for the prevention of corruption came out with its report on this policy and disclosed many corruption risks that on my own, and this law is all frozen, the group is not going to take anyone from the market, they have not been executed yet, but this is happening thanks to public and media resonance, i thank you too for raising this topic how can it end? i think it should end with changes to the law, which was adopted by the verkhovna rada back in may, and this law is now taking effect . banned drugs manufactured in russia and belarus because that is what is written in the law in ukraine, there should be no drugs from russia and belarus. okay, we agree with that, but

the implementation of the law is absolutely the opposite of ms. drugs in short supply on the market of ukraine in general. here in the 11th month of the war, what should be purchased, what state drugs should be paid attention to the ukrainian bridge in the new year, so these are such expensive complex drugs, and now there is an extraordinary shortage of ecological drugs because we are constantly on the in connection with oncology patients who are treated in oncological dispensaries. unfortunately, due to the war, due to delays in supplies, there are huge shortages in pharmacies, so the war also affected the assortment that is in in pharmacies, it is now trying to level off, but in the first months of the war, it was very noticeable, the topic of now you still can't

find the drugs that we have always been treated with, it's quite difficult. thank you for raising it. fund, the patients of ukraine were in touch with us, they talked about how not to harm themselves in an absolutely righteous fight with those companies, including european ones, which continue to work for the russian market , they did not talk only about what methods are available encouraging them to exit the russian market so that our patients and our legislators do not find themselves in the eye of a fork in fact, but returning to our previous conversation, again, we require european farm companies to exit the russian market at that time russian companies with russian owners work quietly in ukraine and ukraine in no way restricts their right to do business here thank you we are doing now