in ukraine, the only social contribution was not paid, was not paid, so today there was such a reserve of euv payers as in ukraine before the war there was not a single country in europe, so what did they do or increase the retirement age for those who should retire in order to reduce the period when they have to pay a pension or are forced to were to raise the rates of deductions and social funds in that pension holiday in order to provide people with the opportunity to live normally in ukraine the problem was in a different demographic in the shadow economy and therefore if you take the results the work of the government, for example, some of this, we achieved that within three years the number of payers of the single social contribution increased by one million 100,000 people as soon as the greens came and as soon as they canceled the measures

we took what did we do to fight against these first, they transferred the authority to control employment in local areas and large cities, many territorial communities elected these authorities at will, received the corresponding functions and could check that a is being done in their territory where we have a shadow economy, this is the construction sector, this is trade, this is the hotel and restaurant business, when you enter any hypermarket, pay attention. who served us is not a cashier, a private entrepreneur, please go, i don't know, to a restaurant there, you will see that you are not served by a waiter, but a private entrepreneur who today, by the way, is somewhat exempt from paying a single social contribution and then they will ask why people have such city pensions because everyone went to those and with the help of the hetmanship with the help of this

the government did everything to ensure that the number of euv payers was minimal. today, it is about 8 million people. it is lucky to talk about the war. everything else will be seen. money is going to retirement today, they want to withdraw part of it and transfer it to the state pension fund so that they can also get rich from it, and even more budget problems have arisen in the state budget of ukraine, so this is an additional way the path is clearly corrupt. by the way, mrs. gazana yanchenko, who today came out of the park, a servant of the people, for the draft law on mandatory state pension insurance, which was developed by mrs. tretyakova, wrote a conclusion. she was the deputy head of the committee on fighting corruption , and they wrote that this law is not meets

the requirements of the anti-corruption legislation is the signature of halyna, who, by the way, i once thanked the live broadcast for taking such a principled position, they fell silent and now, under the noise, the free undertone of the new year's speech this morning, they decided to introduce this scheme again, tell me, what kind of accumulation is it difficult to have in the country if we have inflation, it was 30%, well done. and the same inflation will be in this, in order to accumulate, it is necessary that above the level of information, the yield should be at least +2 percent, where today you will find a business with a profitability of 32%. in ukraine, where does it come from , if it is not there, then what is it? it will simply be a financial pyramid that will collapse, collapse and collapse those who will be in power 20 years ago that neither marchenko nor tretyakova will kill galya, zelenskyi will no longer exist. and this pyramid will collapse when it is necessary to pay. sometimes

they will say, well, we did it all after smearing something with oil, but now it is necessary to explain to people that this criminal scheme is trying to be introduced today under the guise of caring for the fate of pensioners, no pensioners . there is no commercial corrupt interest of the people pushing this so-called reform, it was nice to hear them from some of our viewers, but we need to raise these topics as well. thank you andriy reva, minister of social policy of ukraine from 2016 to 2019 prospects for the reform of our pension provision in the country during the war well, we already have vita domanska, the leader of the movement ,

in contact. petition for this deprivation, almost 70 refused to put their signatures on the petition to speaker stefanchuk about the deprivation of powers of deputies who were elected from pro-russian banned parties together with this, the day before, there was a statement by the representatives of the faction "fatherland and on and god is a servant of the people" that they are in favor of stripping the mandates of representatives of pro-russian parties, but this should be done in a constitutional way so that later these deputies find themselves in the ks and do not approve, the ks does not approve of additional solutions in their favor. how do you feel about this story? who is lying here? who is telling the truth ? who is acting in a populist way? initiated the law on russian parties

, please with the sound no ok, yes, we hear you perfectly, that is, when the ban on pro-russian parties was initiated, no one was worried about alimony for such a lonely person, honestly monitor students, we monitor appeals , we these parties got sick, why should their representative of the company remain with the government in the composition, remain in captivity. that is, this is not a complete sequence. that is, these are prohibitions for understanding . currently, there are four draft laws that have been in the committee for several months. in fact, the sound is floating a little . of the microphone. you will probably be there, and then maybe it will float less, please. yes, and about the bills. we stopped at that, so at the moment there are four bills in the miphil committee, uh, these are the project of depriving the mandates

of deputies of local councils and depriving uh, only one of them is you. deprivation of the mandates of the narders, so the committee has not considered them since mid-autumn, and accordingly this wave is rising because we are in the 10th month of the war. but still we cannot resolve the issue of what to do with those narders and deputies of local councils, also for understanding if the servants of the people they say that removing mandates is not constitutional. they have other tools to work and limit the influence of pro-russian parties on ukrainian politics , for example personnel decisions that do not require any intervention in the constitution a-a at the end of the year, the parliament voted personnel changes in committees e-e because by decision shulyak became the head of the state power committee under the

eye, she headed the budget committee, some deputies changed the committee, but the question of shufrych and the fact that he heads the committee on freedom of speech is not raised at all, for example, i do not understand how they can pro-russian deputies to hold leadership positions in the ukrainian parliament, that is, if you are the policy of the authorities, while we are working out a mechanism as a legal way to deprive these deputies of their mandates. we should use those tools that allow us to limit the influence of pro-russian forces on ukrainian politics. according to a national poll according to which only 3% of ukrainians are ready to give these deputies a chance

to serve until the end of their term, the rest are demanding or early deprivation of mandates lustration or the right to limit the right to take place again, i.e., in general, almost 40% of ukrainians demand active actions to cause the termination of the limited termination of the powers of deputies from the russian parties , there is a high public demand for this, but the ukrainian parliament does not work in the 10 months of the war, and accordingly the appeals initiated part of the servants of a also refers to pushing for consideration and you correctly said that yesterday after the publication of this news there were statements uh from the side of the motherland and from the side of the hearing statements again in the usual way we are good for everything

good against all the bad, but there is no mechanism and no understanding in these statements. so, how to continue working with these deputies, that is, they do not give answers, as a notable fact, they looked at the lists of those people who signed the appeal and there are 15 deputies of the mofil committee, that is, the majority of the committee is in favor in order to consider the draft law on deputies of russian parties, and the statement from the servant of the people that says that there is some position of no deputies, the head of the profile committee comes out, no matter what half more than half of the webket speaks according to the size. okay, what do you think? this story

should end with the adoption of these four bills. and what exactly will happen to the deputy of local councils from similar pro-russian parties? she said there are four bills, and three of them concern it is the powers of deputies of mystic, one of them is the government of grape and he proposes to present the mandate, other projects have been submitted by the government and accordingly they offer the deputy to the local composition to get his term of office, but the status is no longer in practice in which they were there, and there was the creation of certain deputy groups, that is, we leave them like this, they get it, well, such a position is understandable, because it is the deputy who initiates it, and from the police, therefore, when i was present under the profile committee , the importance of separating these two

issues was discussed, that is, we separately consider what to do as acting deputies and separately, we are looking for what to do with amidep, here is my position so far, we are looking for a mechanism that will be constitutional for you, as you said, in order not to appeal the decision, we should also use tools within when these politicians are on ukrainian political systems, namely, this is how decisions will be made and the letter of a doctor who is in the register of state traitors from the post of not just the freedom committee. thank you very much for your work and for this inclusion . with the studio of the espresso tv channel, who noted that it is quite appropriate that while specific mechanisms are being developed for removing the mandates of mps from the national assembly, it would be good to deal with their positions in the committees of the verkhovna rada, and egor.

deputies of local self-government deputies at different levels from the police in certain ukrainian regions - this is a specific share, and as the practice of war has shown, very often these people are the first to help the enemy in organizing the occupation. he is such a guy, he is such a nose guy, that's why i think that for the future of shufrych as the head of the committee on issues in the protection of freedom of speech, i can, we can be, we can be calm, let's go let's reminisce a little about 2019 and an important event in the history of our country. ecumenical patriarch bartholomew signed a tomos on the autocephaly of the orthodox church of ukraine in istanbul. let 's look at the plot in a scroll of parchment

almost a meter long painted by an athos icon painter. on the territory of the ecumenical patriarchate in istanbul, the document became a certificate of the birth of the ukrainian local church, the ukrainian people were waiting for this on a blessed day for seven centuries and finally the time has come for him to receive a sacred gift in the form of recognition of his maturity of independence and independence to free himself from any foreign tutelage and interference that did not always care for and respect his own identity in the spring of 2018, president petro poroshenko said that ukraine is closer than ever to the creation of a local church, and in the fall the synod of the ecumenical patriarchate announced that the russian orthodox church has lost jurisdiction over the canonical history of ukraine and that the mother church of ukraine is once again becoming constantinople on december 15, a unifying church council was held in sofia, at which the clergy and marians of three ukrainian

churches united in the local orthodox church of ukraine and elected its head metropolitan of kyiv of all ukraine epiphany we are the true ukrainian church that opens its doors to everyone those who want the development of this church and the establishment of our ukrainian state, and already on january 6, 2019, on the eve of christmas, patriarch bartholomew solemnly handed over the tomos to metropolitan epiphany, this happened during the solemn liturgy, today's event in the history of our country will remain in the same row with volodymyr's baptism and the declaration of independence of ukraine, the orthodox world will remember the day when the full-fledged church of ukraine entered the family of sister churches among the 14 local churches of the autocephalous ptu, in addition to

constantinople, three more alexandrian greek and cypriot ones were recognized to the recognition of the churches of romania and georgia , experts say that in three years , more than 1,100 communities from the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate have already transferred to ptu polls show that the majority of orthodox ukrainians associate themselves with the orthodox church and not with the moscow patriarchate, and now let's talk about the religion of the church of faith, and tomos, and about the pope who is being buried today . already in touch mr. andriy, still with us rostyslav pavlenko, people's deputy of ukraine mr. rostyslava, we congratulate you too well, let's start with the tomos, so from this anniversary and the importance of receiving it, your e-e reevaluate for this well

only for ukrainian orthodoxy, but for the ukrainian world, mr. rostyslav, what has changed. here are the last four years that have passed since that day. what was our journalistic material about? well, let's put it this way. objective data. you very correctly highlighted in your story where the recognition of orthodoxy the church of ukraine, which is equal among equals with other local orthodox churches, together with which it forms this community of ecumenical orthodoxy. we also see what is happening. it is also related to the fact that people are figuring out what the church is and who it serves, and especially after a full-scale invasion

, when, unfortunately, there are not the same cases of collaboration and work with the enemy, and as the sbu says , cases of such innovators in the abundance and spread of literature aimed at dividing society, all this pushes our citizens to unite with the orthodox church of ukraine, forgetting about moscow, so it is very symbolic that a service will be held in the lavra in the dormition cathedral in the area of ​​the upper lavra the orthodox church of ukraine for christmas with the julian calendar and we very much hope that the moscow church will continue to lose its position in ukraine and will actually be forced to leave this territory and the ukrainian orthodox will unite in their autocephalous churches mr. andrii, well, your assessment of our gains over these four years well, apart from the fact that the liturgy will really take place on january 7 already in the

kiev-pechersk lavra, and many people write that this is already the beginning of the end of the russian occupation of the lavra that lasted there more than 360 years please yes, this is a truly historical event, we have been going for a long time before this, and actually the anniversary of the tomos is not by chance, because in the given volume about autocephaly, the struggle of the ukrainian people for this spiritual independence has been going on for 100 years, and this struggle has not yet ended because uh there are two orthodox jurisdictions, the orthodox church of ukraine and the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, and this is evidence of a certain division of ukrainian orthodoxy that does not contribute to the consolidation of the ukrainian people , especially during the russian-ukrainian war therefore, there must be efforts of the government and the church to unify in order to overcome this division and to have a single local autocephalous ukrainian orthodox

church . in 2019 , it is historic. but also in the current year. because today, from yesterday evening, and today we already know and are talking about the fact that the christmas service will be held on the territory of his pechersk lavra. shift, the orthodox church of ukraine will be in the lavra, nevertheless, we understood and understand the sensitivity of the moment in your opinion , that there are now a lot of cases , and the first cases have been filed against the priests of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, who carried out agent activities, often collaborated in fact with the enemy, all of this can give a new impetus in the history of the uoc-mp,

at least some kind of unconscious tangible ground for reducing its influence in ukraine, it can give such a way, undoubtedly, we already are witnesses of truly historical processes of huge changes that i personally associate with personnel changes and the arrival of the famous ukrainian religious scholar and former people's deputy of ukraine viktor yelenskyi to the state service for cooperation and freedom of conscience and the fact that this certificate will include a liturgy in the dormition cathedral. i think that this is also a symbol of those changes in the state -church relations that are taking place and the influence of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate will weaken in the future. especially since metropolitan onufriy took over such a very strange position, and he does not enter into a dialogue with either the government or the orthodox church of ukraine, he tries not to notice these

truly historical changes. and the people really demand that the ukrainian orthodox church has already definitively severed all ties with the russian orthodox church, and this must be done in the near future religious examination of the statute on the management of the uoc, where i think all these connections will be established and it will be shown that the uoc will continue to be a structural unit of the moscow patriarchate. well, actually, why did i ask about this was said by the religious scholar lyudmila filipovych, who noted that these crimes of treason and collaborationism should not be considered as crimes committed by the priests of the moscow patriarchate, as crimes committed by er, let's say, citizens of the ukrainian state, and that would be more correct, mr. rostyslav, i see that you have a reply there is a reply the thing is that i really respect mr.

filipovych, she is really a well-known religious expert , but here the question is that the legislation was changed on the initiative of european solidarity in march in the first days of a full-scale invasion, the verkhovna rada of ukraine supported these changes, and now the criminal code clearly includes a crime that actually involves cooperation with the enemy of representatives of religious organizations, and the responsibility of these priests is assumed, because this is actually an aggravating circumstance, they are not just unscrupulous citizens, they have in force of his condition, he has an extraordinary influence on the hearts of people, and among other things, the responsibility of religious organizations that support them, nurture them, and the like is in criminal law there is a very clear formula for this, well, and i remember that even a few years ago, 5-7 years ago, when all

this politics in general was moving regarding church security, the security of state-church relations, there was a logic that i am very happy about that is now restored when there is a legislative framework that allows bringing to justice those who are enemies of the ukrainian state and the ukrainian people and allows the state to properly respond to these questions, should you not be afraid that there will still be some that may arise provocations on the seventh of january. during this liturgy of a solemn holiday, please. i personally think that there will be various protests. the ukrainian orthodox church, led by metropolitan onuphriam, will never come to terms with the fact that the orthodox church of ukraine will serve in the lavra. even if it is such a one-time permission specifically for at christmas , uh, we are not talking about constant use of some kind, but it will still cause

dissatisfaction, we are already monitoring it in social networks, maybe not directly by the ukrainian orthodox church, but by various around, church structures such as laymen and so on can organize protests, but law enforcement agencies must work here and ensure public order . i would say that the moscow church can take part in this. rostyslav, your prediction is... it is not just the right and duty of the ukrainian state to guarantee the safety of its citizens and to use within the limits of its powers, excuse me for such a bureaucratic vocabulary, but also in the security service of ukraine and in the national police and in the national guard there are enough authorized forces to actually prevent such actions. i really hope that they are now working properly, again having the experience of previous years that during poroshenko's time it was possible to avoid any exacerbations. in this

regard, i really hope that these relevant developments will be used and the current government will also cope with any provocations or any actions to disrupt this holiday. well, let me remind you that our tv channel will broadcast live on the morning of january 7 with the solemn liturgy on the occasion of christmas day from the kiev-pechersk lavra, where for the first time the liturgy will be conducted by the workers, well, in particular, the patriarch epiphanius, the ukrainian orthodox church of the orthodox church of ukraine, metropolitan epiphanius will indeed serve for the first time in the ukrainian language. who there heard a prayer in the church slavonic language and , uh, a robbery over russia, we let's hear god, the great one, save ukraine for us. oh, how appropriate you mentioned. i just wanted to touch on this question . the fact is that, according to my observations, in recent weeks, russian propaganda has become somewhat

more active in the context of what they believe sincerely or not sincerely, but their shrines why do not we bomb kyiv because there is kieva pecherskaya says the simonyan lavra and now the situation in our country is actually changing in them , the orthodox church of ukraine is appearing in the shrine, which will hold a christmas service, mr. andrew, on your the religious opinion knew this opinion, er, it will somehow affect the security situation in the capital in connection with the seventh of january. well, yes, i think that security measures will be strengthened, but i would like to draw attention to one more point, because among the monks of the kyiv pechersk lavra i very different moods, and according to my data, some of the monks of the kyiv-pechersk lavra are ready to join the orthodox church of ukraine because they understand that the vicars of his pechersk lavra, pavlo lebid, are already

completely discredited, he has become toxic . the leadership of the church does not listen to its own monks, believers, or the authorities, so i do not rule out that in the near future we will see and hear about the transition of monks to the orthodox church of ukraine, but i would also like to remind you that this is a soft transition was given for quite a long time and until now this window of opportunity remains open and about a thousand parishes, if i am not mistaken , of the moscow patriarchate were transferred to the ptu, that is, the codes for whom for whom the question of the canonicity of the ukrainian orthodox church of the orthodox church of ukraine before the kyiv patriarchate was open, that is, there was no understanding to what extent these are not renegades. as gundyaev said, it closed in 2019. there is canonicality. we can finally move on. nothing is in

the way. but those who didn’t move, can we? talk about some kind of their conviction and loyalty to the moscow tradition . rostislav, see the church - this is a social institution. it depends on the opinion of people, after all, the whole church includes not only bishops and priests, but also the faithful and very it is important how the faithful react to what they hear and see, and that is why it is very good that before the new year the constitutional court of ukraine finally unblocked the effect of the law adopted in december 18th that the moscow church should be called the moscow church, and andriy mentioned about the examination that should be done by the relevant body, which recently our victor yelenskyi , i really hope that they will also raise only the documents that were made at the beginning of the 19th year, when the connection of the

ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate with the russian orthodox church was proven to be established absolutely with for objective, organizational, canonical, other reasons, i think that nothing has essentially changed, and then the church will have to tell the truth about who they are, and i think that this will create an additional incentive for communities to go to moscow going to church to a ukrainian church, after all, sociologists tell us that only about 4% of orthodox are ready to associate themselves with the moscow church, and the rest would prefer to actually visit the ukrainian church. therefore, this is also one of the factors. thank you, mr. rostislav. well, i will remind our viewers that today in the vatican is holding the funeral of pope benedict xvi, the funeral was attended by about 100,000 people, the funeral ceremony was attended by heads of state, the royal family and clergy from all over the world