significant tensions the closer you are to the front line than where you communicate with people who are directly engaged in hostilities, then actually there are few people who say that the enemy is weak and stupid . he doesn't add up, so they made significant mistakes. but this is an army that learns as it goes, and we also have to take this into account. really, now the enemy is trying to plug holes in the front line with mobilized people, and now he really wants a truce in order to form new units from those mobilized. right now, we believe that both the year that is ending and the next year are connected with the fact that we have to continue to carry out active offensive actions and knock the enemy out of our land, the enemy is also now trying to gain a foothold and continue to hold the borders that he receives for now the most important thing will depend on the approaches of the general staff and actually on foreign

aid, because in this plot it was said that we really need foreign aid, we will need military equipment , because having seven hundred thousand personnel who can fight uh, we have and have the appropriate amount of equipment for these people and then we can really receive any loads and really achieve victory on the battlefield, actually what we dream about in the rear and think that the guys are in the trenches they themselves dream of victory. i hope for the test that it will be done by the joint efforts of both our society and theirs . be yuri please, if you want to ask serhiy as an expert on military topics, please, i am constantly interested in serhiy, because he is really an expert who answers the questions

that are asked and answers expertly serhiy , look, uh, lena already started talking about it , she didn't start there. she said that this year changed her, she became a radical, i also became a radical, you are talking about the fact that, well, obviously , we all understand that the victory will be ours, we want it to be a victory earlier, but now i, as a radical, radical you i will ask: when will the end of the russian army be according to what you know according to your estimates? well, now you are trying to impose such a responsibility on me that concerns the definition of the border of this war, in any case, if we consider the statements of our and military leaders, everyone is counting on the fact that powerful companies will be carried out precisely in 20123, this was what zaluzhnyk was talking about, and it was precisely due to the fact that it is necessary to form reserves in order to carry out a series of operations to completely bleed the russian army. that is, we we need to carry out several more similar operations

, and i still hope that the next year will be decisive and it will actually be a harbinger of the end of the military campaign. it will in some way politically affect the situation in the russian federation, but from the point of view of the use of military force, the conduct of several offensive operations in the 23rd year is decisive for the ukrainian side. i think that they are counting on this and foreign partners who determine the directions of aid and i hope that this will happen and this war will probably end next year, you know how you talked about morale, there is also a mathematical calculation that can happen in the same way if we proceed from what is on the battlefield, which weapons we have, which we have the mobilization potential - the mobilization quality of the mobilization potential, then it can be like this. of course, something always happens in history that was by no means predicted, like in the ancient greek classical drama

ex-vahina, god from the machine, that is, something like that appears or like a black swan well, it changes, it can happen again, ukrainians thank god, during this period, they learned to be very down-to-earth , realistic and rely on their own strength and on each other, and not sit and think well, maybe putin will die tomorrow no, we are doing our work yevhen, so you also have a question, please. my question will concern the western aid from our partners, which serhii already mentioned, and in the plot it was said that this aid underwent a certain evolution, if before the start of a full-scale invasion and at the beginning, we were supplied with javelins, we were supplied with stingars, that is, more of this guerilla war can be said later, after a few months, ukraine received modern heavy weapons, modern artillery, they received zna and heimers, what can be expected next, what is critically necessary for ukraine in order to liberate the territories and what are your forecasts that allies

and partners will provide tanks and aircraft to ukraine well , actually, when we talk about the first period of the war, there was a certain sense of mistrust on the part of our foreign partners because indeed the supply of such light incoming weapons for small groups that we stopped, e.e., tank columns that were moving there in kyiv, this was the first such test , one might say, of our power using those samples of weapons that were considered sufficient , then it was clear that these weapons are is not enough, and the situation after severodonetsk showed that we really need severodonetsk, in principle we lost it, including due to the fact that we did not have enough artillerymen, there were no heimers. so after severodonetsk, it heimers appeared and actually then a certain turning point began on the front line of the enemy , losses increased, let's say, their warehouses began to be destroyed , their stocks were destroyed. the enemy began to panic, and then the expansion of capabilities due to long-range artillery showed that we really can have the prerequisites for successful combat

operations, now of course we are talking about the fact that we should carry out further offensive operations, liberating first of all the south, and this is a rather difficult territory, which, relatively speaking, with light equipment, is quite difficult to liberate there indeed, now it is a question of heavy equipment , uh, a sufficient amount of artillery, because they say that even when we talk about the enemy, even in terms of guns, the americans gave us 350 communities. yes, the russians now have 1,500 grams on the battlefield, in fact, they have an advantage in the order of that is, for these communities we have a much larger number of high-precision ammunition, we can, relatively speaking, at the expense of a smaller number of bpps, destroy more of the whole, we are doing this, but we are starting to gradually liberate the territory, we really need tanks we need armored vehicles. we need more heimers and we need aviation and anti-missile defense, this is the line that we

mentioned in our story, now the situation has become better because we started to receive air defense complexes, this is actually the first such significant shift after heimers and now we expect of heavy armored vehicles , the dynamics of heavy armored vehicles with airplanes is so far the most difficult, because the americans and europeans believe that the transition to new models will take a long time and, unfortunately, such a first step has not yet been taken . we are stomping around soviet weapons, which have actually been exhausted, the europeans do not have them, the americans do not have them either. i think that this second end of the second year and the beginning of the 23rd year should be the basis for changes in approaches to the supply of new types of weapons. i think that the 23rd year will be really decisive when we get american tanks and american bmps, and i think it will be much faster than it will be with the german

models, because it is precisely march 23rd, according to our estimates, we will receive german heavy american heavy equipment for such will be later, but just after e in the spring of the 23rd year, all the prerequisites will be in place for the start of offensive companies using , perhaps, the use of powerful american ground vehicles. colleagues, if anyone has any more questions, you can ask them. no. then i have a few more words, i have no questions. then i will say a few words, but i don’t think so. and listening to you , serhiy, i don’t think that of course until uh, we will invest in this year, that is, from february 24 to february 24. god bless us, but we will live this year, i think, but i am interested how are you do you think, as a person who deals with this topic , when ukrainians will go through a year of war, we once, i remember when we were going here to lviv, well, with relatives from kyiv, we

stopped somewhere in khmelnytskyi region and said goodbye because we were going in one direction , and they were going further. we are somewhere, well, in two weeks, somewhere, we will go back, it will all end, we will meet somewhere, that is, i was sure that there would be two weeks, well, weeks, three , then a month, then two, then six months, but i think it will be a year, and how will it change ukrainians, but when we go to you know the marathon one the distance has already been longer than a year, what will it do to us, how do we feel about the war? well, in fact, sometimes i think about the war and i always think about the losses, because every victory on the front is paid for with the blood of our people. that is, she tells him, do we understand that we survived there for a year due to the courage and soldiers and officers who actually withstood the first onslaught, then we learned to fight even better, then new equipment appeared. but a year has passed and we have to move on. and passing an additional amount there is

the mobilization of everything else will be affected in one way or another by a much larger number of our population and the tangentiality to the front line will be greater. i think that this will make us possibly tougher. but we understand what the war is in the name of, because the enemy wants us to cease to exist as a state have ceased to exist as a society, as ukrainians, this is precisely historical, this battle with the enemy has been going on for centuries, and i really want this battle to be the last, so that we do not win, and then these sacrifices of ours will be of significant importance for this victories, so i think that actually we will become and continue to become even tougher, but this may bring us closer to victory, which will be the last battle for the fact that we have really become as a society, as a state, become eternal and that no one threatens us, now we will move on to something sergey, we will now move on to the next topic. i mentioned oleksandr oles, how can he not believe me to quote because i do not

remember everything by heart and did not read for myself, but the key words are that when ukraine was bleeding , europe was silent and it was 100 years therefore, when exactly, well, let's say, europe is not active or not participating to a large extent in the war of the ukrainian people's republic against bolshevik moscow. it recently had the opportunity to win then and in the 22nd year, in fact, in the 21st year, this war was lost the second the winter campaign choked and that's all, but this time europe was not silent, did we force it to speak louder, or did it become bolder thanks to the courage of the ukrainians, in any case, help from europe, help from the united families of america and actually the whole world, because it is rammstein gathered 40 countries that in one way or another, they help ukraine, the role of world aid, people, politicians, volunteers, investors, businessmen, showmen, everyone involved, how important it was, and how much it was necessary for the pagans to stand up and continue to stand.

let's look at the material in the case of the united states of america and great britain . in ukraine, washington and london actively warned us that russia was preparing for war and already during the last few months before its start provided us with significant military aid for that so that we could stop the aggressor and then they continued to send us a lot of weapons to drive the aggressor from our lands in general, the united states of america and great britain gave us more than 30 billion dollars and this is not the end almost all the brotherly eastern european countries extended a hand of support to us and even when further in the west of europe, in warsaw, tallinners, vilnius, prague , bratislava and other capitals of countries who know what the russian occupation is, they doubted or hesitated in unison, convinced that the victory of ukraine in its

just fight against the aggressor is the victory of the whole of europe and not only convinced, but also help beat the aggressor , while the baltic countries even allocate aid to us in the amount of almost 1% of their gross domestic product, the attitude of some western european leaders to support ukraine, in particular the president of france, emmanuel macron, and especially the chancellor of germany, olaf schulz , is impressive before the invasion they talked until the very end that putin had no intention of attacking ukraine, however, after the invasion, they slowly but also began to change their attitude towards the kremlin. and most importantly, they stopped afraid of putin and began to give us weapons pope francis from the very beginning of the russian war, he was wary of directly blaming russia, although at the same time he constantly mentioned the much-suffering ukrainian people, called to pray for us and even

offered to become a mediator during peace negotiations between ukraine and russia, but at the end of november, the pontiff wrote a letter to the ukrainian people, again did not directly condemn russia, but openly condemned the war that the kremlin started and began to call russian crimes precisely yura's crimes. i will start my question to you, or giving you the floor, uh, the first person president zelensky called when the war started, i think it was the fighter johnson, whom he woke up . what happened and then we remember this video that appeared recently when macron sits like that with his hands folded in prayer and tries to say no , it's not war, but zelensky says on the other side of the phone, he says it is a hundred there war is one europe plus johnson who is there i almost flew to kyiv and not to a certain macron

europe was different how do you think ukrainians united the world around them, what was key and important and how do you evaluate europe 's help to the western world? europe at the beginning of this russian war in ukraine was the second europe, i would even say it in a different way, there was one event before the beginning of this full-scale invasion of ukraine and there was another event, there were countries such as great britain and the united states of america, which immediately even in two months before the invasion, they constantly talked about it, they warned us about this invasion, and even a few weeks before the invasion, they gave us weapons, really. they were weapons, as sergey said, more for the partisans of some kind of war, but they gave them, that is, they knew that there would be an invasion and they we were helped by countries such as you already mentioned, the president of france, emmanuel macron, the chancellor of germany, olafsholz, who until the end. for some reason, i don’t know

why, they believed that you need to talk to putin, you need to go to putin by example chancellor olafsholt of germany, then he appears literally a few days before the full-scale invasion, he was in moscow, sitting at this long table with putin and trying to convince putin, knowing for example that he cannot be convinced, uh, because there is no sense in this persuasion, putin was sitting he also understood that no one would convince him there was another europe that did not change, this is eastern europe, countries that knew what the soviet union was, a country that knew what russia was, which is the successor of this of the soviet union, which felt very strongly about this soviet union, these are the baltic countries - it is poland, the czech republic or slovakia, which also extended a hand of help and support to us from the very beginning, but it started with the fact that there were countries that immediately began to help us, and there were countries that

did not immediately for example, france and germany. well, here you can mention other countries, which were also not from the very beginning, but they transformed, this transformation that you talked about in your blog, this transformation took place, ukraine united this event, i can confidently say that the same one has the same thing, even though they are up to december and including december in the game, they are talking about the fact that it is necessary to continue to negotiate with putin because talking with putin is the way to the fact that in ukraine for this is one of the ways in order for peace to be planned in ukraine, they now have a different vision of this putin, fortunately , it is not exactly what the ukrainians probably wanted , but it is different. they now see terrorists as a terrorist who comes to a foreign country and says that this country, well, in fact, should not have existed at all. they exist too they understand that this terrorist can only be fought

with the language of force and they give us these weapons. germany, no matter how much they cry now in germany about the fact that they do not have reserves in the bundeswehr themselves, they give france, they give us weapons, and these are the same countries that i have already mentioned the countries of eastern europe and the small baltic countries, in which the armies themselves are small and the reserves are not enough. they give us so many weapons. and how much financial support, er, 1% of the gross domestic product, they give us to help, and of course, with this, the mastodons in in a good understanding of this word great britain and the united states of america, how much support and help did we receive from them, that is why there was support before the full-scale invasion, there was support during this full-scale invasion, and i very much believe vasyl, and i will also believe sergey, that in 2023 this

victory will come so that after of this victory, we will preserve such trusting relationships that have developed between us now when we see one problem and we are going together to solve this problem, so this is the moment such a year of war there, well, almost a year of such a full-scale war after the great invasion, and the big problem for western education is that they look and cannot see and what will the world be, relatively speaking, if russia loses and what will be the configuration of the new world, and i have it says the question why eh politics in the 45th year , let's say there was a different situation but they saw they built a new world imperfect not ideal the cold war began there were many other problems warsaw countries of the warsaw pact bloc nato, but you were built another world , a new world without the league of nations, without another for the organization of poor nations, now the politicians have not yet reached such a level to build this

place to see it develop it, has the time not yet come? he has prerequisites for this vasyl, you know me i think that there are prerequisites, the time has come and something like this is being built. this new world is being built. if before this world was built around some relations between these big countries, including with russia, in the world that is being built, less attention is paid to russia. that is, that huge country is the country in which the most dry land on the planet earth, which could dictate a lot of things in the life of ukraine, including now attention is being paid to it, but at least not as it was before now there is no russian gas, we will buy another gas in saudi arabia, there is no russian oil, we will not buy anything this oil is in a boat, for example, or in other producing countries , there is nothing we will buy. the same russia does not have

semiconductors. she is looking for them. and she can’t find them anywhere because they can’t find them. there is nothing else she can’t find them. that’s why i don’t. it seems that this is the kind of new world that is being built, a new world in which i would not like to say that there will be no russia, it will probably be crushed, maybe a small particle will be, it will still be, and russia will be what it will be, but it will be a new world. i suggest a colleague, please to join and ask questions to yuri lehn eh i will come from the other side i really like to explore some media products in russia we have olga lentyaka this is a professional super professionally engaged in the channel i am a little less but still i completely i recently re-watched the international sawmill program, just for god ’s sake, margarita simonyan’s husband, and in general , they think the program is funny, it

’s about world leaders, and they are the authors of the program, they create a certain image for each of the world leaders. their old grandfather who is delirious and so on and so on, but it seems to me that they humiliate emmanuel macron the most, they always find something in him that is simply disgusting to describe the worst the worst what do you think why why exactly on him contempt pours out the most and why, at the same time, macron is constantly making some kind of server, this is towards russia, i cannot give a clear answer to your question. i do not know this answer, because really, if you take other world politicians, they would deserve such treatment other world politics, for example, the same borscht johnson , whom they simply hate in moscow, now decide the dream book well, they know him less, less

about him, and ah, to the shark, the bean, they as far as i know, they do not treat him like that of emmanuel macron, perhaps because they placed too much hope on emmanuel macron that he would not support ukraine as if they wanted him not to support and as it was. by the way, at the beginning, as i said before the invasion, that is, he until the end, i thought that it was possible to talk with putin, he talked with putin until the end, in fact, he continues to talk, but oh the information happened to him maybe he betrayed them in this way and they maybe so on him somehow, i don't know, they are taking revenge on him, i don't know how to explain it but it's kind of real, but it also shows the culture of russians, well, it's toothless, this program shows the culture of russians - that's right, because i just need an idea from this program to cut out macron's writing itself, make french subtitles and somehow target it all at the french in social networks so that they

looked at how the russians treat their president, so that the president himself could see how much they don't hate him, in fact, they despise him there, they just mix it with shit with anything. i think it's a good idea to remember there was such a president in france who well, he took part in the second world war , marshal de gaulle won it, but he is known for the fact that in 1920, when the famous battle of warsaw took place, in which, by the way, the ukrainian sich riflemen took part, there was also such an international expeditionary corps. said the legionnaires were also among those legionnaires who came to defend poland. charles de gaulle was also very young then, but here he is. of all any and e and the frunzes who made their way to warsaw well, you see macron a little differently oleksandr if you

have any questions, please know yuro, eh, my viewers are asking, they especially asked at the beginning of the full-scale invasion. so why aren't the sanctions in effect? war all the more, i find information for my publications that sanctions are still in effect, warnings on exports, restrictions on the maximum price for russian oil, i tell this to the viewers, but to you as an internationalist, is there unity of all states, in particular of the european union regarding the implementation of these economic , in particular, restrictions on the allocation of international aid there from all the countries of the european union in our state, is there someone poking sticks in the wheels, so to speak, eh alexander , there is someone poking these sticks in the wheels, unfortunately, in general, sanctions are in effect and there is this agreement regarding sanctions in general, but there are a few countries that still, for some reason, i don’t know

why, maybe because of fear, maybe because of some other reasons, but they are slowing down these sanctions, that is, there have already been several packages of sanctions which countries slow down on the ground, it's a great pity it's close to us, hungary, a great pity, it's quite often austria , a big pity, it's greece, to which they loved to go er and love and ukrainians will go er in the summer, that is, there are such countries and they are afraid of some fear is fear because of the fact that and what will happen if, for example, russia wins this war and not ukraine, and what will happen if naftogaz is cut off from us in general, how will we get them, although other countries are not afraid of this, other countries are finding some diversify these supply routes and without them, there are still people living in these countries well, but there are few of them, there are few of them and this makes me happy. i know what to do to yuri, if possible, we often talk about the fact that the

western world is one way or another with ukraine here. the leading role belongs to the united states of america europe yes it is it is also formidable, as you have already said, but it is still with ukraine, this is the western world, but there are other players on the map, for example, china and india, which do not support russia, but they do not support ukraine as passionately as we would like, can this change? which can force china let's say to change this position the east is a very delicate matter when they said yes and it really is so because these countries that you mentioned their leaders first of all think about themselves and while thinking about themselves they will not think about ukraine they are far from us their own for them this war is very far away for them, the main thing is to ensure a normal life for their citizens, they will do it if they need to buy, for example, this is how they think in china if they

need to buy oil or gas in russia and if russia will give a discount on this gas. they will build special gas pipelines for this gas in why not buy them, they think the same way in india, for example, if you need to sell semiconductors to russia, which russia does not have at the moment, but we can hang them there, why don’t you sell them , and therefore, speaking of whether we will have this support, i really hope that will it be or is it now, should it be, that is, do these countries see that a full -scale war is going on in our country, a full-scale invasion of russia against its sovereign neighbor, i unfortunately do not see this at the moment, you know, not only diplomacy is a weapon, not only a weapon is a weapon on this war with weapons and money, and i think many of those who follow what is happening in ukraine , especially in the west, in other countries, they thought that how much ukraine is a show economy, how much will ukraine last, how is she

in general, how will she manage to stand and not fall, how this year, the ukrainian economy survived, thanks to what, and what, we will enter the next year, we will talk about it later , and now we will talk about the economy in the year of war, a miracle or a pattern, let’s see the material, sowing this year in ukraine took place under with shelling, the occupiers prevented farmers from going to the fields in every possible way, destroyed machinery , threatened with massacres and destroyed the fields with rockets. under crossfire, suppliers took seeds from warehouses in the kyiv region in order to deliver them to the fields in time. the evacuation routes were destroyed . endless air alarms and a shortage of people, because many farmers volunteered to go to the front. they sowed mainly rape, sunflower , and cereals. they made a bet, and for buckwheat this season, it was collected one and a half times more than

last year, so it will be enough for own consumption and the government noted that the ministry of agrarian policy and food reported at the beginning of june that it was possible to sow 75% of last year's area, this is a record figure if we take into account the active hostilities in the spring, it will bring profit to the budget and agricultural producers and grain exports, despite a smaller harvest than ukraine harvested last year , what will farmers have to sell to the world market despite the opposition of the kremlin, the grain deal extended queues and empty atms in the first days of a full-scale war in the past, despite the difficulties faced by the banks on february 24, the financial sector did not stop. even for a day, specialists ensured payments and access of clients to their money, and finstanov branches in cities and districts liberated from the enemy are resuming their work, provided that the lives and health of clients and employees are not currently threatened