alive, of course, that turkey used all these sanctions restrictions of the european union, because where did russian business rush? of course, in turkey, from expensive yachts to ether , there are russian ones. well, absolutely. first of all yes there and whether transit of people now turkey has accepted it that is why it is such an interest in bread there is an interest of course there is a certain ryname because thanks to his mediation not only his but the un is an opportunity to feed the countries of africa. well, actually for turkey - this is important . i don't know the exact number, but more than a million syrian refugees, our forests and shelters in syria, operating in turkey, and the insane need to be fed with something, well, bread is such an important component, and that's why, of course, so why

did the turks at one time buy stolen ukrainian grain there from the crimea or the southern regions because they needed to earn money and work, including their own population. for example, as a closure or spore dardanil for russian warships at the beginning of the war as a supply to ukraine with a joint joint production of drones there are a number of others are er let’s say so cooperation in the defense-industrial complex so that it balances he thinks that it is gaining momentum that it is regional well yes, in principle, he has extremely strengthened the regional role of turkey, that is how they would be in this case if he continued to act, yes, and indeed a little detailing in turkish and its multi-vector nature in this situation is very russian propagandists,

who at least publicly take the position of critics of the authorities and the current russian general staff, do not like it, they are very surprised, they say, in particular, about turkey, how come we have gas hubs - nuclear reactor s400 and crowds of tourist investments, and they are drones and armored cars in ukraine well, it is telling and actually characterizes turkey's attitude towards its role in the given region. well, this country's relations with it would seem that they are completely opposite poles . thank you. foreign policy balances interests and values ​​now more turkey insists on - more precisely, i apologize for the interests, although the humanitarian humane component of turkey's policy towards ukraine is oleksandr oleksandra well, we

are moving on and have several important messages for you while we are waiting for our next guest, as we have already noted , the direction of bakhmut, soledar city under the control of the defense forces, although heavy fighting continues , well, patriarch kirill addressed his people and congratulated everyone on christmas, and the head of the rpc kirill gundyaev said that ukrainians are russians , attention and what a surprise, one people and one church he is doing everything so that they do not become enemies . he said about this in particular in an interview that russia is one, without a doubt, it is one nation that came out of the kyiv baptismal font, but it is already a very large nation from white and black to the black sea, the orthodox church was and is a force that binds together this nation is a political excavation , there is something that ukraine has declared that it is radically changing the vector of its political and i would say historical development and that this new

vector does not coincide with the vector of russia 's development. brothers, so to speak, and does not bless the russian soldiers for what they are doing, and this again does not please the russian propagandists, who think that we consider them to be sincere critics of the russian leadership , meanwhile, yesterday, on christmas eve, russian soldiers shelled the town of gulyaipole more than 200 times, this is on zaporozhye from tanks and mortars of the rsfsr, despite the announcement of a christmas ceasefire, there is no information about the victims. so far, this happened during friday. they hit the territory of the city 200 times, it was small, 200 times on the gulyaipol field during the day, there were more than 200 hits on the territory of the russians, and mortars were used by rocket launchers , the website of the national police says that as a result of the shelling, the housing stock and civil infrastructure were damaged

, the situation also remains uneasy in the vasyliv district , in stepnohorsk, warehouses at a local enterprise and in the village were damaged by hail pavlovka , located near the city, a private house was damaged by the fire of the russian invaders, that's all in zaporizhzhia yesterday. well, let's move on to the conversation with our next guest, this is jason, jayce march, an american political technologist. we welcome you, jason. hello. if we speak in ukrainian, you will understand. can you speak russian better in ukrainian education? i hope that you will still make an effort and try to understand us. for the 15th time, 15 votes were needed by kevin mccarthy to become the speaker of the house of representatives, in my opinion, this is a record.

the speaker of the house of representatives was elected, please give a record. this common language between them is simply impossible from this republican to these and there are enough spikes for us to become the speaker and it is difficult for you not to see this from 15 times and the participation of 100 years is like aa viber and the first day of the congress that chose novospekera what is this in general the last time i voted when in the republic of the confederation we have two parties in america and the democratic party vy congressiya iz etogo that she and i could find

voices of your party it is possible for me, but they did not have a congress, but there is a mandate, but i would say a very weak mandate in memory of jason. please tell me what kevin mccarthy’s personal attitude is to the ukrainian issue. any peace at any price or a war hawk who believes that ukraine should win back its territory and only then sit down at the negotiating table, what is its attitude to the ukrainian issue and to the restoration of the territorial integrity of ukraine, i am asking for good weather there, ukraine definitely supports this i think that you will look at all of them specifically, here is this, but there is a wall ready to give money and weapons, you are a second question, yes, and this is understood. well, she has a republican party, this is exactly part of the unblocking of transport.

i didn't really look at the person in the extreme, so i 'm not ready to transfer more weapons or give that money to ukraine, and we see that it 's bad about how much it's already 15 times, and i voted, and he managed to come to an agreement with them, and how was it said when with them, a different place, and a place in the committee of the congress, this is a very important computer, such children are people and trump . in ukraine, anyway, i think that there will be even more new money and money in ukraine well, but what position does he personally take with regard to ukraine regarding the increase in financing of military aid to ukraine? is it important or not important now ? dmytro, when talking about

russia, the problem is not what russia is doing. this is the problem of america and our partners, and it is a guarantee. america and i understand that this is a war that you will protect and help ukraine by interests as long as it is possible to end the war, that you have territory in ukraine that there was some kind of conflict in europe below the seminar well, you mentioned the leadership of the committees of the house of representatives, what is this the people who headed these committees and also what are their attitudes towards the russian-ukrainian war and support for ukraine and the military financial i am asking africa

not against to help the blessed poor people in america and from this, we are just opposed to analogues will look in russia and i don’t like russia, in fact , they had it all the same or a-a that it’s just going to be new and a few want to pay taxes and they are now something important some kind of inter-regional interest or yes below is the national security of america and not толко духумут лово очень день, how can we make our americans pay less taxes, jason? but the americans themselves, uh, american society, isn't it tired of the war yet, aren't there uh, tense moods when americans start asking questions about how much more we need to pay from our taxes to help ukraine let's deal with the internal american

problems for the americans i'm all of them all of you are thinner in europe and why is this war not only for ukraine, it's about the safety of the world so that i don't understand that it's in my interests so that i don't travel to ukraine if they fly from the fact that you are correct step well and for the time explain to them so that they do not understand why the world will be safe when bezopasny bezopasny when ukraine ato or ukraine will be the european union and take them why is it inviving ukraine wait indigo so that i do not support this, surely jason , the edition of the ocean post reported that the biden administration is not yet going to give ukraine heavy tanks abrams m2 in general,

what is the position of the administration of the president and representatives of the american parliament regarding the provision of heavy offensive defensive weapons, in particular, tanks. this is what we saw and already wrote. and what america wanted at first was not a lot of money, i wanted a gift, but no. you need to listen, and then start a conversation if it will be highers or neheimers, and then the other and touch and it seems like a day to me every time i ask you to agree to the weapons i see that they already know that the risk is that russia would start some kind of nuclear war, this is a very low risk . yes , faster and better weapons, and yes, theft. and why didn’t they give a few ruzhyns and technologists,

well, guys, time, this shows that there is more, this self-defense if it happens, it can be dangerous, and in america there is something interesting, but based on these figures, i see that ah, that's it avrons m2 note and this is this, this is me in my sambora, why did she decide that exactly this is not possible, this is how the attacks are not given a legacy, it is difficult to understand, but there is a person who worries that this will be a conflict now, and it won’t even start. that is, jason , in your opinion, it is possible that the states are just waiting for europe to make its move, in turn, in particular, and supply us with leopards, for example, because we just received a very powerful aid from the united states for 3 billion.

thank you for this, a cool package, very cool the nomenclature of the names of the weapons and, accordingly, the step taken by the states, now europe also has to do it, if europe gives leopards, it is possible that the abrams from the states will fly and swim. i don’t know. well, you know that this is a good question. it's been a long time between us and what's this, what's the delay? it's hard for me to understand, actually, i think that's what the question is. i didn't see this, that ukraine will get lost in europe and i want to drink in the european union, and we see the europeans and it was that now in the region

. which is very weak, that is, very lazy, a-a, and on the direct decision, he became the best, and no, no, no, why, and what is found , it is not included. well, and finally i wanted to ask you about the last visit of the delegation of american senators to kyiv, who was part of this delegation and what were the main questions and problems that interested the american senators when they were in kyiv, what did they ask about, what did they want to know about the situation in ukraine in the capital, from the ukrainian authorities, please give me a specific time we have our sanatorium, or how to exchange energy, it is important that you do not see a situation that does not have an effect, that it is just one survival, that you are not just through

the newspapers well, they themselves arose with you, what is going on, i do not hear the same that the president zelensky wants what he thinks, as he thinks that what weapons are necessary for ukraine, and let them hear for themselves, and so on, why is m2 so important, for example, that i am sure that there will be no more semyon looks at it, does not understand it, does not understand what is the difference between them a well , if they are already listening, listen to what they understood . and then they can do more when i will not be your member and a secret lawman at home, and he will change our policy and for us to help ukraine, oh god, and quickly. thank you, jason smart, an american political technologist. on direct inclusion with by our studio thank you for participating in our broadcast and we already have ilya, it seems, not skadovsky, the head of the analytical direction in the ns network or ants, congratulations ilya do we have

peasants skadovsky broke the connection, this happens on we will announce what exactly we will talk about in the meantime your favorite topic is the confiscation of assets of the russian federation. is our country doing enough to find, freeze, transfer, warm? well, in the end, it may even nationalize this first question. well, the second question, are we able, given the scale of actions in our country, to do something to demand in general from our partners ilya na shkadovskaya, the head of the analytical direction in the ents network, we are in touch with us, congratulations, good day , good day, panel. russian federation and accordingly can we demand this case from our western partners if we do not do our homework well, i completely share

your concern about the fact that uh already enough time has passed in order to develop and adopt all the necessary legal mechanisms so that the property of russian oligarchs becomes at least state property, it is arrested or at least frozen at the moment. they are the beginning of war. in fact, on fictitious persons and to rewrite it to be taken into account accordingly and due to various offshore opportunities, and this of course causes serious concern here with i'm sorry, we can hear you panel. and you can continue, well, we can't see well. but it's good, so now regarding the question about

what we should do with the ministry of justice, the ministry of justice itself, as far as i'm concerned, has not worked out the issue of sanctions at all, it has started to act effectively only two months ago only two months ago only the list of persons to whom sanctions are applied was determined, those sanctions that should be applied were determined that were no longer different from those sanctions that are in principle our international partner is used, but at the moment regarding directly the property and regarding the activities of companies that are related to the russian federation or are owned by the russian federation or directly by the state , to date these campaigns. they raise questions in relation to ukraine, why ukraine does not take appropriate measures against those people and about whom even they have a serious serious question, for example, and this concerns not

of ukrainians who cooperated avoiding the kremenchug council, this is the russians' removal of russian property. how they operate in ukraine , therefore, we fully share this concern , accordingly, we raise this issue regarding sanctions, because yermak's group is very strong and effective, one might even say, working on the development of sanctions and proposals to the american government and the european parliament about what needs to be done in relation to russian property 0 but well, in my opinion, it is also the most effective group in relation to russian property inside the country eh and of ukrainian companies belonging to the russian federation, to date there is simply no panel. and what are the most interesting cases of work, even more problematic, i would say cases of russian business in ukraine, what should the ministry of justice do in the first place, in your opinion , please name by industry and by

russian companies which have either a russian business or russian owners, i ask , first of all, energy companies, all energy companies. to date, it is the fact that they have operative management from russia, this a serious threat to our national security, the second point is the extraction of strategic strategic raw materials, and even at the beginning of the war, some raw materials that are necessary for the production of weapons, titanium , aluminum, these raw materials were supplied through a european campaign, asian companies, and then it got into russia, the question arises how and why it's so easy, just a few chains to make eh and further later. this is not tracked in our sbu, the question remains open. if we talk, even our companies are on motor sich continued to supply directly to the engine

during the war, this also causes serious concern, and despite the fact that the sbu knew about it even a few years before, listened and had information before it carried out certain specific actions in the industry, of course you said, i will call it so that people did you understand, please, the language of the energy center of the babakov group and the driver of the scientists there is one there, there seems to be a criminal authority, and then mining is a scurrilous slur - this is mykolaiv alumina, right, you are talking about it absolutely absolutely, and it is these mind you, this is a strategic strategic direction for us, which actually leads to the fact that we become, well, our national security under the control of persons from the side of ukraine, the aggressor,

then a-a. war, and the russian e-e banks were stopped from their activities and, accordingly, the property was actually frozen and was transferred under the leadership of the national bank, here the question is, let's say, thanks directly to the national bank, which had already developed mechanisms in order to hand over operational control to ourselves and then we will take certain steps, but this is the property of the russian state, but it is the property of the russian oligarchs, known to the alpha groups, and it actually remained under the operational control of the same persons despite, let’s say, certain operations that were carried out in order for it to be considered that now it no longer belongs to him, it is not controlled by him, i.e. disclosure but they do not even

hide that they remain the owner, they just brought one of us there in bulgaria it seems that there is a respectable person who worked there in europe, they said that now he manages our business in ukraine, but he is the owner. we are with the owners, who remains in this business, and what else? -e next then shoes e-e retail various shopping areas that are owned by a-a russian oligarchs next then this is a matter of supply e including and e-e various e-e there and costume jewelry and e-e perfumes there and so on and this is certainly unpleasant, well, at least it is not critical, but of course a decision must be made in this matter, and a decision must be made,

definitely one more, i’m just you name the industry and i name the last name, which has a reteleim resume in ukraine and in certain trading platforms, it is absolutely true here , here it is, of course not, they do not belong to that that they own some critical infrastructure or some critical enterprises, after all, this is only a business, but i'm sorry, how does it happen that then this money goes directly through various schemes through offshore, then goes to russia, which pays taxes, therefore, in this case, it is necessary to make a clear decision about the fact that it should also become the property of the state, then it should be implemented, sir . i am asking a little about the transfer to the property of the state. which will be able to be collected for the benefit of the reconstruction of our state, how

should this happen purely mechanically? well, that is, as we understand , those russian assets were confiscated somewhere, and we charge them to the account of the ukrainian state, which this should be a special account later, as well as from it and according to what principles these funds should be distributed, please. well, i am against the increase of the state share, but it becomes the property of the state, operational management is carried out. we have arma, of course, there are many questions about it. day of arma is necessary, of course. let's say it is possible to some extent to restart and, er, to carry out a certain purge of those people who work there, because their activity, yana, raises a lot of questions. but we don't have another tool. yes, if we are going to talk about money, then this is a national bank, there is a separate account for this separate account. funds that belonged to these state banks have now been directly decided by the government that these funds should be used

for housing reconstruction, this mechanism is quite simple and in this case there are no objections because all these funds and assets directly belonged to the russian federation, there are no problems directly with natural persons, then a court decision is necessary here, and the court decision should be, accordingly, on transfers of the property directly, the army must either carry out operational management of this property or realize this property, if it is possible , and accordingly determine such a well, then, as a circle of scree, recognize some contests or some others. because really, if it is implemented without contests, then in favor of some persons accordingly, it passed or not. this method of such earnings was already secondary, but in any case, to deprive the management of a-a so that the russians do not carry out operational management in any of these enterprises. of course, this is possible and necessary because it really becomes a

threat to the national security of ukraine p. yuliya , but still about who should personally deal with this in the cockpit. where is denis malyuvska, who is responsible for the fact that russian business continues to work in ukraine, either as a russian business or as a supposedly european registered business, but with russian owners. at the moment, i do not see what other additional persons. of course, we can say that the system is built in such a way that various functions and levers are scattered between many well, let's say so by the authorities, but if we take where should it be concentrated, who is responsible for this - it is the minister . them as soon as they are developed and

then, in accordance with ukrainian legislation, take all the steps that are necessary in order to first deprive operational management and then to realize this property so that it goes, the funds went directly to the special account of the state budget, those goals were aimed at the reconstruction of housing, in relation to the infrastructure reflected there, in relation to directly. of this central body of executive power thank you well, we have a minute left, let's briefly talk about another topic of the panel, what do you plan to predict er, well, the ukrainian gdp, the main macroeconomic indicators of ukraine for the new 23rd year, gdp inflation, the hryvnia exchange rate, briefly

, please. % of growth it can be much more because we asked very much in 2022 and in fact the decoupling of the territory will lead to the fact that enterprises that already exist will be registered in these territories as a result they will give a timely gross domestic product our ports will be launched accordingly the implementation of what could not be organized as a result of their work and this will give a corresponding plus and this is a plus. i think there will be about a 10% increase in gross domestic product compared to 2022 due to a very strong subsidence, this is even without investments in relation to inflation, inflation is two times less, that is