depends, of course, on the plans of our command, because judging by these statements regarding the delivery of heavy equipment to us, we again have the same deadline of two, three , four months when we receive the main mass and the bmp. i hope tanks and the like , that is, our offensive groups will obviously also be ready in uh, three, uh, four months, and in the spring, obviously, we can expect such attempts by ukraine and russia to conduct their powerful offensive operations, what to do now, i think, of course, to fantasize it is very easy, but the best thing to say is that this operational pause can be used to carry out our offensive operations, to try to improve our conditions in the east and in the south. military actions, eh,

which actually have no operational significance, but only tactical ones, eh, like bakhmut soledar, they eh, of course, in any case, they also take away the ukrainian forces because , of course, the russians are also getting exhausted, but they were acting now mainly in these directions by the efforts of the wagnerites, and for example, in the area of ​​kliminnaya, paratroopers are concentrated there , including those withdrawn from the kherson bridgehead , so here everything depends on the ukrainian command . tactical operational situation just in time for the preparation of the next major offensive operations, already taking into account the new western armored vehicles, this is interesting. i think it will be clear again in a few weeks, because just the next weeks

it seems to me that they are crucial from the point of view of preparing for that spring campaign, but the question is how putin is really trying to shape this campaign, because you are absolutely correct in asking the question, if putin has elections in march, then by this march, it is necessary to show some success or somehow transform it -e defeats and tragedies in order for putin, on the contrary, to be supported and not reduced, and here we just need to sit down and spread it out, it seems to me like a calendar plan when putin will take these 500,000 and even if these 500,000 will be defeated, how will he present it as a positive thing for himself, that is, a call from the depths of the people and even more to unite, rally around putin, around this single grant of russian statehood and, for example, nato will capture

russia and destroy russian civilization, that is, there may be such a plan that well i think that, after all, now putin is asking the question so gerasimo this carblanc in order to prove that he did not fail. that is, we know that this gerasimo failed and he is accused because he failed in the shooting of the mongoose in february of last march year and now he seems to have a chance, well, show me. maybe you will be able to show your abilities now. but i think that gerasimo knows for sure that he has no new chances. he is simply forced to do this, he simply has no other way out. he is all in this boat sits and he simply will not be able to escape from it. well, then that means that if the opponents have a long-term military-political plan that is tied to putin's election campaign, then the question arises that we should somehow take this into account. and then the question arises that the statements of our individual

officials that the war or the most heated phase will end in the summer of this year are actually, let's say, excessive expectations. and i think that the rhetoric from the ukrainian side should be that we have to prepare the population always prepare reserves for the fact that actually this year will be important and decisive, but not the last from the point of view of the introduction of war with the russian federation, so it turns out, well, it is obvious that russia will try to drag out the military company in order to prevent failures, in any case, they will definitely hold on to donetsk, luhansk, this is such a symbol, that is, even if ukraine liberates, let 's say, the territory until february 24, that is, the tentative minsk agreements for them, it will simply be categorically unacceptable to allow ukraine to take, for example, donetsk or luhansk because it will be a really

huge blow to putin's authority, well, that is, you started a war, and as a result, we lost everything that we had, and even well, then why did it all start, well, and of course, crimea, that is, another one a strike, for example, on the crimean bridge, can really strike a very powerful blow to putin's authority. in fact, this year is very risky for him. for example, i do not rule out that he can cancel these elections altogether, that is, the introduction of martial law and there will be no elections , so we can say now that putin is trying to extend this status quo , i.e. without martial law, and still fix it in the elections on february 24 of the next 24th year. excuse me for your status and there for a few years, this is the best option for him. if the ukrainian army can really to break through the front and really make powerful advances, well, in the next six months, this will

mean that he will simply declare the need for a truly patriotic war, the introduction of martial law and the cancellation of any elections, then he will simply abandon the idea of ​​even theoretically talking about elections will say that after the war, we will talk there, and it may drag on until the end of putin's physical life, so here we cannot actually say that we have no opportunity to complete this in the third year, but we have to take into account what putin has. these are the plans to drag out as much as possible, to throw into this furnace as much as possible the maximum number of people in order to ensure a comfortable election campaign . then i 'm sorry, well, for him, for him, in principle, then it won't even matter what the situation at the front is, he can declare

anything as a victory, even when they withdraw from the crimea, he will declare that this is the best result now we have to pay even more, but the state of war is maintained because too many of us can be attacked now and that's all, and that is, on this background, it is easy to continue to balance this elite and destroy them little by little, because again, remembering the sanctions pressure literally yesterday, the day before yesterday, such new analytical materials came out. how do sanctions and embargoes on oil work on petroleum products? what kind of embargo is russian petroleum products introduced only on february 5, and already analysts have calculated that every day russia will lose from nu about 200,280 million dollars every day is a lot, if in terms of a year it will be about 100 billion dollars and this is really a defense budget, that is, it will be necessary to sharply reduce other budget expenditures, because it is obvious that the defense budget will only increase

, mobilization and er and such a transition to military rails, it will be budgetary expenses, it is still a capitalist country, it is for the soviet union, and therefore putin has huge challenges, and the 23rd year will be, i hope, the last one for him, but it will be very difficult in any case, and it is extreme, mikhail the question now is that rammstein is approaching, which will actually become such a litmus test as to whether we will really have the potential that will allow us to ensure such an important turning point in this war in the current year, what are your assessments and forecasts regarding this very fact of this meeting and the consequences of this meeting from the point of view of it receiving certain weapons, it is very interesting that rammstein will be on the 20th. and two weeks before that date, very active political showers of information about possible deliveries and uh especially with regard to tanks, that is, leopards

and challengers have started. we have a lot of discussions, a lot of information, and it is obvious that there is now pressure on the german leadership, which is actually now between a decision on the supply of leopards and a decision to leave for some others, i would say hybrid-hybrid approaches because, to be honest, i don't know how ukraine can then be with these, for example , 100 challengers and leopards, well, it seems to me a challenge because for the system and logistics and material and technical support preparation specialists and so on, so i hope that the german leadership will still be convinced that the main tank should be the leopard-2, it is normal to modify it, in any case , we have tables of leopards, after that the rammstein will be the first step to create such a new tank fist of ukraine, in any case, i would like believe in this, mr. mykhailo. thank you for

your expert comments, and i will remind our balls that mykhailo himself, the deputy director of the center for army convalescence and disarmament research, was on the air of espresso channels. and now we have the contact is artem vyunyk, director of the research and production company athlon avia, which is engaged in the development and production of unmanned systems used in the armed forces of ukraine, mr. artem, i congratulate you . a decisive role in what the ukrainian army is doing on the battlefield, and the war itself is now on the field, both are actually a war of artillery and intelligence, where unmanned systems play a key role , and we are also talking about the fact that russia he is trying to wage a war of attrition where he uses various methods to somehow achieve some success on the battlefield and when we talk about unmanned

systems there from the ukrainian side, from the russian side, there were such statistics regarding the truth of ukrainian unmanned systems that actually in the first months even in the first week of hostilities, the ukrainian army lost about 90% of unmanned systems , you and i knew these numbers, but in principle they kept them secret, although now a british report has come out, where these numbers were actually announced there as well it is said that actually a copter lives there for a maximum of three flights, and a fixed-wing aircraft there for a maximum of six flights on the battlefield and it is destroyed. what are your statistics ? company well, indeed, the numbers that you voiced and that were given in this analytical report are somewhat true, indeed we are

observing a completely different situation than it was before february 24, the use of rockets other means of physical destruction of our aircraft, but it must be said that our manufacturers, all ukrainian manufacturers, not only the klonavia company, very powerfully, expanded production, scaled up and provide for today, in principle, overcame that crisis which was actually there in the first month or two after the start of the war, because deliveries of e-e complexes and individual aircraft are carried out in large quantities e-e, of course, even this quantity does not fully meet the needs, but again, the work on the increase of production capacity continues and i

hope that in a few months we will reach a fairly serious level of providing our armed forces with unmanned systems, on the one hand, we are talking about those complexes that are on the other hand, all companies are working on improving the development of some other solutions that we actually, the situation on the battlefield dictates and today it is very nice to see that a large number of new companies have also entered the market with their sometimes quite interesting products. i hope that they will also supplement as soon as possible the army of drones that our army needs today. and regarding the use and experience of working with the military, it must be said that by now there is no doubt in anyone's mind that unmanned aviation plays a very significant role in combat operations. this

contributes to the very constructive cooperation with all the e-e power agencies that make up the defense forces of ukraine. can you somehow comment on this situation, which consisted of the supply of copters there or components across the polish borders ? a short period where actually there was a significant number of accusations from volunteer organizations there from various structures that it was possible to put or get copters or get by contacting it became extremely difficult compared to previous periods, has the situation changed now, how does it look today ? it is not very pleasant because the strengthening of control in the european union and in poland in particular leads to the fact that an ordinary customs official who ,

at the checkpoint, he examines the documents, he , let's say, reinsures himself several times, and because of this, we have problems with the supply of those components that, for example , until october, drove completely calmly without any obstacles through the territory of the republic of poland . on the one hand, eh, but on the other hand, it creates significant problems for us , including fingantz problems, because we cannot build complexes according to the schedule, eh, we cannot ensure the fulfillment of the terms of state contracts, we receive fines from of the customer, well, actually, this problem still persists, but in principle, we have already overcome a large part of these problems. i hope that in the near future we will learn how to live

with the new rules and the new requirements of the polish side. after all, we have no other way out , we have to adapt. but again it's still very unfortunate that, for example, today they cannot supply us with components for purely civilian purposes, because the polish customs for some reason considers them to be dual purpose products and requires receipt licenses that are sometimes not received for a month or more, but we are still working. i think that the situation will improve in the near future. you speak diplomatically enough, although the problem is quite significant, and is it possible to understand at all how these actions on the part of polish customs are strengthened, or was there any precedent? this is a general policy, the more so just a couple of days ago, the

president of poland came here, there were confirmations, as always, let's say yes to close interaction, we can hope to receive leopard tanks from poland there. and when it comes to other components, then we see what is happening there, there is such bureaucratic friction, what is the crux of this problem, as far as i know, there are two components here, first of all, there are certain legal acts that were adopted in poland about a year ago, which uh, have uh, formed other requirements are slightly stricter requirements regarding the transit of dual-use products in the territory of the republic of poland. but just like in our country, so in poland, after the adoption of this law, there was a certain inertness and, in fact, it is, in fact, it can be said that it was not applied. but after since me it is known that they are not related to the republic of poland

, the question is, i think you know this situation , that through the european union, dual-use products were sent to iran, which were then discovered in the composition of the same martyrs, and i think that this is exactly it. became such a trigger for the application of even earlier legislation, and here we have the result from october, we have some deliveries since october, that is, for several months we have not been able to pick up components from our warehouse, and in poland we appealed to the ministry of defense. the ministry of defense in turn uh connected the military attaché and the embassy of ukraine in poland, there are certain developments, but unfortunately, some problems still remain, well, i hope that our broadcast will be another rational post in order for this problem to be solved as soon as possible, and you mentioned

the martyrs here, and i know what yours is about the company also analyzes the russian samples that fall into the hands of our military. what are your assessments of what the enemy is doing now with its aircraft, or is there any progress in the creation of these unmanned systems some peculiarity of the tactics of use, especially in the context of not only reconnaissance complexes, but also strike complexes , because we have repeatedly seen examples of the use of these lancets, which are actually quite disturbing from the point of view of our security . this morning we are examining a new sample that came to us, it is one of the arlan 10 and it is quite fresh and it must be said that some foreign components that we previously observed in earlier versions of the croatians have disappeared from it it's very nice, er, instead of them,

er, more such people appeared. well, if they are not civilians, then the industrial solution is er, and this indicates that the sanctions are really working. this is very good, because in any case, it is e worsens the technical characteristics of these products e-e but nevertheless it must be said that one should not underestimate the e-e air defense system of russia, namely the unmanned segment because the experience of companies that produce unmanned complexes is quite large a-e they started much earlier, moreover, they left in 10 years ago, the other account is probably not 10 anymore probably already 20 years ago, they bought israeli licenses and carried out development on the basis of these aircraft and complexes, and the israeli experience is several tens of years. so, it must be said that they are doing quite powerful things, but we have something

to oppose to these developments from our side and we are working on this, is it possible for ukrainian companies, in particular your company or your partners, to create joint projects that could be such a synergy effect when the potential of one country and the potential of another country will allow a short intervals of time to create samples that can get to the battlefield as soon as possible, and in particular to balance the actions of the enemy there in the same strike segment eh well, indeed eh, negotiations are underway with our partners on the transfer of technologies that allowed to speed up the development of strike complexes eh i really hope that these negotiations will be constructive and end in success. that is , we will join efforts to develop similar solutions and i think that this will happen quite soon. and one more

component is related to our work the ministry of digitization allocates quite significant funds for the purchase of unmanned systems, the main thing is that they are civilian systems that are adapted for a military mission or, er, this volunteer component somehow increases the ability of your company to increase production rates or create new solutions that are currently needed in the field i am really pleased that the ministry of foreign affairs and the vice-prime minister fedorov in fact took up this issue so seriously. recently, we had a large round table on the development of further developments and the provision of the army unmanned complexes, it is very nice that people are taking care of this issue, it means that it is important and it means that there will be a move forward regarding cooperation directly with the minsophora on the

supply of e-complexes. at the moment, our company does not have such contractual relations, because we have a large contract with the ministry of defense and we are making every effort to expand production and increase the number precisely within the framework of state contracts with the ministry of defense, this is the number one priority and for now, unfortunately, unfortunately, we do not have free capacity for that to cooperate with volunteer organizations or conclude contracts, for example , with the same ministry of the digital situation, you mentioned our military's close work with the ministry of defense. and are the military's own approaches to what kind of unmanned equipment they need change, because in 11 months i think manufacturers have also learned to produce equipment more and better, but the military also had to understand the features on the battlefield, and this should, well, on their part, somehow

shape the requirements in advance so that our developers could adapt to these requirements and create models taking into account the prospective needs of the ukrainian army, is there such a dialogue or are there such promising visions of interaction between the military and industrialists, of course there is such a dialogue. it has always been and now it is even more constructive, including our a company that makes an unmanned artillery fire adjustment complex e-e some actually adopted as an artillery fire adjustment complex we actually have a technical task e-e from e-e missile troops and artillery on let's say that the improvement of our complex, taking into account the experience of using it in recent months, it is about the fact that it is necessary to have a longer flight time, it is necessary to know where to do something what, for now let 's say that our complexes are not able to, but these

developments are already are continuing and i think again somewhere in 2-3-5 months there will already be tests of a new aircraft with improved characteristics that will meet the requirements for accurate to- this is very cool then let us know about it we will try to support it informational but with there is something else, because there is a complex, there is a new model, but it is also important that the effective use of this complex by personnel, how is this happening, are there any nuances that should be taken into account, because yesterday we spoke with a fighter who uses copters there in the zone of solidarity, there is an intelligence unit he says that actually now the enemy is starting a hunt for the calculations of unmanned systems and this is actually one of the priorities for the enemy's artillery there, the enemy's special operations forces

, to destroy the groups that control the unmanned systems, is there such a thing the threat to the complexes that use fury and how are the personnel currently preparing for the use of your drones. i think that the threats for whom for e-e calculations that use fury, after all, they are smaller than for those units and calculations that use copters, you taking into account the flight range of the depth of operation of e-e copters and airplanes actually having a rather large radius of operation, i.e. more than 30 km to 50. perhaps under certain conditions e-e our complexes can ensure quite safe operation , i.e. placement of crews in those areas uh, it's difficult, uh, it's difficult to get, for example

, our enemy's artillery, at the same time , uh, let's say, increasing the safety of flights and the safety of crews, it's also in the hands of the crews themselves, because uh, the choice of the site, the choice of the location, is also very important for this they teach this at the courses, we teach when we interact with the crews and i think that those who take care of their safety in principle work in fairly safe conditions, well, we can say that until today, from february 24, we only have actually two cases er when the operators of our complexes suffered , even though there are hundreds of them. and now we have a situation when we are actually entering winter, it has already begun, and how do these winter conditions

affect the operation of your systems ? there are some new challenges that now accompany the use of your complexes on the battlefield, well, you know, when it's cold, planes fly better, this is physics because the density is greater, the density of the air, that is, the atmosphere, and er, the lifting force is greater when er, when performing it does not affect the flight distance or flight time again. we do not have any significant frosts, i.e. the temperature is up to -10-15°, it does not affect the operation of our equipment in any way, and even higher and lower temperatures also do not

affect, well, again, under the condition of proper preparation for flights, storage of the aircraft and the batteries for them in the given specified conditions, and yet another thing , that is, it is impossible to say that somehow our complexes work worse in winter than in summer. they work artem's p. is just as effective thank you for this inclusion, i wanted to thank you for your work for the work of your company so that you make more planes for our armed forces and the quality is the same as it was before, and i would like to remind our viewers that the espresso channels were broadcast by artem vyunik, director of the scientific production company atlant avia which manufactures complexes for our artillery. so, when we talk about a war of attrition, we see that the technological capabilities of our country fully allow us to counter the enemy using our various developments and then on the air of express olga will continue laziness with the program of security information war olya i congratulate you for the word,

thank you serhiy congratulations well, talk to me actually , this is a very good moment to tell, and how in general they are trying to iron propaganda in culture, if at all, sculpture and cultural figures are happening in them, so in a moment look, the other day, solovyov decided to explain to the russians that, well, how to say it, they didn’t screw up and then they beat everyone, and the explanation was such that it caused wild indignation even among legitimate rashists back in last year, we could have ended the speech by conducting an encirclement operation according to the classics, and then i remember that i was very upset by this phrase of our president who said we will not do stolinograd under the donbass, although it would be logical to do it now i understand the whole idea of ​​the head , imagine this

did not stand now