done fundamentally, but they are in a hurry , they are in a hurry because someone likes the profit of the nuclear power plant on the basis of corruption, please, in this case, correct that it was six months to use the implementation report, and the draft law proposes 12 months, which is more appropriate, so the committee rejects the correction, please for voting on the 32nd prague tymoshenko and others, i ask to vote by the committee rejected for 44 43 decision not made please olena 34th is available yes yes 34th amendment in accordance with article 33-1 of the law on committees of the supreme

the councils of the committee on issues related to the subjects of their visit carry out agreements and consultations in cases provided for by law, taking into account the important strategic importance of the state enterprise energoatom, which is now being transformed into a joint-stock company in a criminal and illegal manner against state interests, the presence on its balance sheet of state-owned objects that ensure the national security of ukraine and the privatization of which will create significant risks for the economy and security of the state, it is proposed to provide for approval by the committee of the verkhovna rada of ukraine the subject of which is the development of nuclear energy, so that not a single enterprise that is part of energoatom

could be sold without such an agreement. we are not used, and the committees do not yet keep payments and the register of debtors, so in this case you rejected this amendment, i put the 34th traffic jam authored by tymoshenko and others to a vote, it was rejected by the committee please vote for 41 the decision has not been made the following 38th hour 37 is taken into account by us and in your letter 38 the next 38th paragraph of the seventh part of the

third article is being formed one exclude e the speech is going but in general i want now to deviate a little from e-e let's say specifically this paragraph of the seventh well, let me say the following things that now this draft law is essentially a time of war, where does it go when there is no live broadcast of the verkhovna rada, when it is not energy, the people of ukraine can not know what is happening here behind closed doors, and when you voted today that today's meeting will not be broadcast in the recording. right now, the handing over of the nac to the energy atom is taking place . i would like to address andrii mykhailovych in this case, this question concerns the assessment of property valuation and where it is not possible to assess it, this property is

assessed at its residual value, therefore this washing machine was rejected by the committee. i put it on vote 38 edit by committee rejected tymoshenko's authorship please vote for 45 decision not taken next 43 yes and i just want to continue what i said i want to address now to all people's deputies state officials for those who are aware and understand what they are doing with the energy atom, categorically find any opportunities, leave the hall, get sick, do whatever you want, but do not

vote for this bill, which directly violates the national interests of ukraine, which takes away from ukraine the cheapest electricity we have, which takes away from ukrainian families everything that today we have left we have taken peace taken away life taken away men and women in the army from our families and they are protecting our land today and we have some resources left what else hasn't been taken from us and this is our cheap electricity, don't give it to corrupt people, in short, the position of the committee, the committee rejected this washing machine because it considers it impractical.

thank you. volodymyrivna 45, i want to contact the head of the profile committee now because you are the personification of this disgrace that is currently happening in our state. please, do you know at least one state in the world that during the war, during the ruins, behind the backs of its own people, practically turned into a vaccine company. and this means the sale of all shares, this means the loss of control of the entire object from the government of ukraine, is there even one country in the world in the history of the world that would treat such a strategic

property during the war like this is the first question for you and the second is whether you know the statement of the prime minister of france who said that the french company that manufactures will be nationalized short position the committee on the 45th amendment is hereby proposed to expand the powers of the committee on energy issues so that it approves the property valuation act of the nuclear power plant, but we are modest people and we do not need excess powers, that is why we rejected this amendment. thank you. amendment 45 tymoshenko was rejected by the committee, please vote for 42, the decision was not made next amendment 46 i understand correctly, please, i want

to draw the attention of the hall and those who will listen. actually, this meeting is recorded at least in our social networks and on our accounts. i want to say once again that the chairman of the committee did not answer the direct question now. i ask it once again, are there any examples in the history of the world that a state that is in such a brutal war in the midst of it practically now deprives itself of the right to manage such a company as energoatom and in fact conducts now the transformation of a state-owned enterprise into a joint-stock company is essentially creating the prerequisites for the privatization of profits and the privatization of part of the shares, and in addition, do you know about the statement of the prime minister of france, who said that she would nationalize, please

position on the 46th amendment, the committee rejected the 46th amendment, and in this case the state does not lose nicol or control of the nuclear power plant, so you can safely vote on this bill. amendment yuliya volodymyrivna 50 and please and now i want to address both the country and the members of the verkhovna rada and state that the chairman of the committee deliberately did not answer my direct question whether there are such

examples of such a property as energoatom, which generates 50% of the cheapest electricity in the world, so that during the war it is essentially now being delibrated on e practically in front of the eyes of its people during the war and behind the back of those who defend ukraine. there is no answer because this is a crime against the people of ukraine and he did not provide an answer to the question of whether he knows that the prime minister of france announced the nationalization of a similar company, e-e, the same as our energoatom, instead of making it a joint-stock company, he did not provide any affection the position of the committee on 50 and the amendment is a person who knows about nationalization and in our country the energoatom sign will also be exclusively owned by the state and only the state will manage as for this amendment, it is proposed

to replace the word society with a lowercase letter with the word society with a capital letter, the committee still decided that here the association should be used with a small letter, therefore i rejected the amendment, i am putting the 50th amendment to the vote, please vote, vote for me 43, the decision has not been made and the next amendment 52, yuliya volodymyrivna, please legally correct and grammatically correct writing of the law of projects is ridiculous for this audience that there are many details that are important when the law

is considered to be written competently or illiterate and there are many technical amendments that really from this absolutely well, i would say that such a moronic law is made at least something like a legal document and that's why there are technical corrections. and this absolutely does not override the very essence of this law, the essence of which is unconditionally accepted against the national interests of ukraine, and it has already turned into some kind of game in this parliament when it is discussed bills that appear to be in the national interest of ukraine, this is what hawking calls for. what kind of competition is there to see who will get more votes for this stupidity , and that is why i am asking smart deputies for this dear colleagues, please briefly state the position of the committee on the 52nd amendment and the amendment regulates the terms of the inventory and in my opinion, this rule should to remain in the

draft law, therefore the committee decided to reject this amendment 52 tymoshenko's amendment was rejected by the committee, please decide to vote for 37 the decision was not taken next amendment eh 55th yuliya volodymyrivna, please yes, and i have one more question for the chairman of the committee, dear chairman of the committee, do you remember the promises of your president of your faction, when you went to the elections, you said that any even minimal issue is minimal that touches the interests of the people's state will be put to a referendum and only after

it will be adopted in a referendum, only then will it be voted on in the hall, people naively believed in it and now when people are fighting for the right to exist at all in our to the state behind their backs. you are bringing these criminal laws today. please tell me, were you going to hold a referendum on the topic of such treatment of the energy atom in general? will you continue to be behind the backs of our people and soldiers, in this case we have once again come to a fundamental correction, the word "community" is written with a capital letter is it a small letter, the committee still insists that it is written with a small letter, but the next amendment will again be about the word society, whether it is with a capital letter or with a small letter. amendment 55 tymoshenko's position was explained by the committee, it was rejected by the committee i ask you to be determined and vote for

43, the decision was not adopted, the following amendment 56 yuliya volodymyrivna, please write a draft law, everything is not a native word on the fence, write where there is absolutely no meaning from a capital letter from a small middle letter , what are the definitions to denote it in general, and it is a pity that in this law there are many such senseless errors even which you don't want to correct well, that's not what we're talking about today, yes, we have a lot of technical amendments there because professional people worked on these bills, but you did not answer the question is why today you manipulate the ownership of the energy atom without giving the people their

will, hold a referendum why do you do this during the war who gave you such a right and why do you break your promises to the people of ukraine and why do you do it secretly behind closed doors answer this question don't hide don't hide just tell me briefly the position of the committee, well, it's obvious that i'm not hiding because i'm standing here and the fact that the property of the energy atom is prohibited for privatization is what the first page of this draft law says, in this case the word again society whether with a capital letter or with a small letter is possible let's think maybe really with a capital letter then you can support this amendment dear colleagues, the 56th amendment was rejected by the committee yuliya volodymyrivna demands to put it into consideration i put the 56th amendment into consideration i ask you to vote for

69 decision not taken yuliya volodymyrivna next amendment 58 and please dear mr. chairman, when i say that you are hiding i am not saying that you do not stand on the podium well, i have all seen yes you just have such a very public now the position on the podium i say that you are hiding from answering a direct question why do you do such things pass such laws behind closed doors without live broadcast during the war behind the backs of those people who are fighting at the front and you know very well that what is written now in this according to the law, 100% of the shares belong to the state, this is a temporary transitional stage, and then, according to the law on joint-stock

companies, you can sell the shares with absolute peace of mind. according to this law, you can transfer management to anyone and here it is written in this law from please briefly the position of the committee briefly yuliya volodymyrivna article 1 article 1 the draft law is still beginning and in article one it is said that shares and partnerships acquired by the state as a result of the formation of a partnership are not subject to privatization period not subject to privatization period this the answer to your question and it is very simple that they are colleagues of the 58th amendment of tymoshenko, it was rejected by the committee, and i am putting it to a vote, i am asking the people's deputies to vote for 39, the decision was not adopted, the next amendment is yuriy

volodymyrivna, 60, please, this is not subject to privatization, this is absolutely not a definition that applies to shares, because many other transactions can be made in relation to shares, which are not provided for in this law as a prohibition, this is also the sale, this is the transfer to the pledge, everything and the transfer to the management and many, many more what else and that's why this law is a fraud because it's an absolute er, well, let's say a fraud in its essence and what you're doing now, you just deleted our amendments that fundamentally established the prohibition of any manipulations and operations with with these actions, you just crossed out our corrections, you did not take them into account because you

know very well that every word depends on how these actions will be treated. to state property, therefore, corporatization does not mean privatization, i hope all these halls understand this, thank you , the 60th amendment of the tymoshenko people's deputies was rejected by the committee, therefore, please clarify vote for 34, the decision was not made, please, over the next 62 rubles, please, mr. chairman

. if you say so, dating does not change the status of a state-owned enterprise, then please tell me why you started this whole story , why this law at all, if the status of a state-owned enterprise does not change, why all these shrenya all articles simply explain the purpose of all this fuss that you started if as it remains state and will be state please explain well, that's how it is prescribed second explanatory notes to be added to the draft law i recommend everyone to read and in general, the form of a joint-stock company that is owned by the state, it provides for the transparency of the company, it provides for reporting, the submission of financial statements, quarterly, half-yearly, and this is a significant improvement in the quality of corporate governance and the quality of transparency

of the work of this state-owned enterprise. for the vote, i ask you to vote for 32, the decision has not been taken yuriy volodymyrivna, the next amendment is the 64th, if i am not mistaken, please dear mr. chairman, to be honest, i listen to you and think, god, what a pity that ukraine is ruled by such people. in other words, you say that this will increase transparency, which means that for almost three years your government, which ruled energoatom, ruled opaquely. i am talking about the chairman of the committee, mr. stefanchuk. no it doesn't concern you, you can sigh calmly yes, and they will wipe out the poc, everything is fine, i just want to

say that for three years the government worked in a non-transparent manner. this means that you were involved in corruption. kickbacks and bribes, what does it mean to do it in a non-transparent way for 3 years, well, this is just some real nonsense and you think that the prime minister of france proposed to nationalize his production company and the 64th amendment of yury volodymyr tymoshenko was rejected by the committee, i ask you to decide and vote we strive for self-improvement, that is why we are trying to improve the voting, mr. chairman of the committee for 35, the following decision was not made: 66 i just want to say that

, because of the short editing time, i cannot say again that in france in 2000 there was the decision was made to carpathize the adf company , a french company that produces up to 80% of nuclear electricity, the new prime minister of france made a statement that they will nationalize the company def make it completely state-owned again due to the war in ukraine, the instability of the energy markets and increased a danger for the country. and we have a country where and where there is a war, where there is absolutely danger, including a

colossal energy one. and vote for the 32nd decision , the following amendment 68 is not accepted, please , well, this is the general position of this law. the presence of unsatisfied claims declared by the creditors of nike energy atom, enforcement proceedings, tax liens and other restrictions on the encumbrances of the atom and its property is not a reason to refuse inclusion in the of the unified state register of legal entities of natural persons-entrepreneurs and public formations of the record of the termination

of the energoatom, or of the state registration of the company beautiful, simple, well, i understand that this amendment was not taken into account, but i wonder if it became clear to all deputies from this answer why they are carrying out corporatization, that this is absolute corruption that is being prepared and it is national and absolute treason , and sooner or later you will also be deprived of your mandates. how were other people deprived today, please position committee on the 68th amendment and let's move on. well, we have come again to this derisive question, whether the society is capitalized or lowercase. i propose that the floor decide how we should use this word, thank you. vote 68 amendment yulia volodymyrivna tymoshenko, it was rejected by the committee, please vote for

43, the decision was not taken, the next amendment is the 70th yulia volodymyrivna, please, dear friends, i would like to give you information as the prime minister of france e argued why the french government nationalizes uh the company for the production of nuclear electricity edf why because e-e corporatization led to a significant increase in the price of electricity for consumers because when independent managers came, as they say, and this whole law that we it is now suggested that management will be transferred to independent managers there, so in connection with the arrival of such independent managers, the cost of nuclear electricity for the french has increased greatly for french

consumers, and for this purpose corporatization is also being done, including our energy atom, because for our consumers it is there will also be excessive prices and excessive positions of the committee on the 70th amendment. capital letter ago please make the right choice with your vote thank you i put the 70th amendment under the authorship of yuria volodymyrivna tymoshenko for a vote by the committee, it is rejected please vote for 60 the decision has not been adopted the next amendment 72 yuliya volodymyrivna please yes, it is

about the fact that what concerns one of the first goals of the corruption model that is currently established by this law is to convert the cheap nuclear electricity that is provided to consumers into electricity, as they say, at the european cost and for everything this will pay for our business and our consumers, our people, who are already suffering tragically today. he will pay for his atomic electricity in three days. we went through it when the same equal people on this podium, the same people, made a sign, a sign, with oil and gas with ukrainian mining, when the price of gas rose nine times, the same will happen, but for electricity, do not vote for this law, the profits will go to the corrupt tymoshenko

, rejected by the committee, please determine and vote for 36 decisions not taken 83 amendment, dear friends, i just want you to compare, for you to compare how, for example, the french government cares about its consumers, how it cares about its electricity supply system of ukraine , and how our government and our committee. country to hand over our energy