the discussion we are having with washington in washington has already stated that they need to think about the transfer of long-range missiles to ukraine regarding long-range missiles, said the deputy head of the pentagon of the united states of america for political issues - kolenkal. we continue to hear interesting comments about them, i think it is useful, there is a need to finish further beyond the front line and without going into details i will say that we recognize this need in the current phase, we should think about how to help ukraine overcome this challenge, but i will not decide in advance, what kind of system could it be, well , that is, the americans hinted that such long-range missiles would be in ukraine, and why, according to your official statement, did washington delay this because it is afraid of escalation and is afraid that putin will use the transfer of these missiles for

direct escalation. i believe that the west is still very active in the transfer of weapons to us. so, for example, the bmp had to be transferred months ago. the decision was made. as far as i understand, it was announced a little earlier at the beginning of the year in order to also convey putin's political signal that the west is with us consistently and to the end and all russian considerations and hopes that the west is tired, the west is frozen there, the west is something else, they really are never really this, and let them stop talking about it, and i am absolutely sure that in russia at least putin and part of his the clans are ready to wage an

ideal war on exhausted italy and wait for the fact that at some point the power will reset in the united states and in europe. i hope that the next thing we will hear from rammstein about tanks should be a signal for them, and even if it is not a signal, it should be a blow to the face that no-no-no, we will be here until the end . for me, missiles are the question for today number one, if a decision is made to supply us with missiles, and it is not just from a news point of view or from a political point of view, it is fair from a human point of view if they hit us,

civilians, everyone, with their missiles, we have be an opportunity at least for the purposes of within the framework of ukraine to use it absolutely without any restrictions and my son is my signal. if you want to our friends, you are not the one to limit putin and in no way limit us, of course the americans will be sensitive about whether we will use these missiles on targets on russian territory and it will remain so for now a question for discussion, but what kolen kolinkel said, you just quoted him, it actually gives us the opportunity to hope that the solution will be important, it will be limited at first.

deviates from the red lines that he taught himself, and i think that here it is necessary to be very consistent in this determination, it is our determination. it should somehow inspire that part of politicians who think too long and too long. and in war, time is life and time is also a weapon on solovyov's propagandistic russian channel, the russians are again blackmailing them with nuclear weapons and talking about this blackmail from the state duma deputy general grulev, who said that due to the expectation of the appearance of german leopard tanks on the territory of ukraine, they they can take the button from the nuclear weapons again and use it, let's see

what the gurul said, i generally think that the appearance of german coal cabins on the russian territory, probably in any war , as only one for the prose but what happened in the great patriotic war cannot happen again, they have absolutely no such brakes, and when we discussed this study a week ago , is it worth remembering about nuclear weapons? the territory of the russian federation and the apparatus travels through the territory of the russian federation in the kherson zaporozhye regions

occupied by the nazis. this is generally a reason for us to use nuclear weapons, during the last year, mr. pavlo, you and i talked a lot about whether they can use nuclear weapons or not they talked about how they use the nuclear power plants of ukraine to blackmail the whole world, such a detail is quite good and it shows that in the russian federation there are a lot of contracts for the construction of nuclear power plants or parts of nuclear power plants all over the world, if i am not mistaken, the amount of contracts there is about 200 billion dollars and megabytes, despite all that russia is doing

at the zaporizhzhya npp, what it did at the chornobyl npp in early february and march, still the toughest sanctions are not applied against russia when conditionally speaking mgt can simply cancel or at least contribute to the fact that all these contracts will move away from russia why mother is not in a hurry to do this mother will not do this for this waving there is no political will or mandate and now there is a discussion about what to impose sanctions on the russian nuclear sector, some elements are possible, although they are very weak so far, but this, too, the fence

may be in the 10th package that is being discussed, the americans began to discuss the problem of imposing sanctions on the russian there are actually many nuclear sectors, but one of the main actions is the dependence of the west on fuel and not so much on the production of nuclear fuel, because on enrichment, this is now the dependence will decrease, nothing is impossible. at the beginning of last year, germany bought gas, coal and almost half in russia and that's it bye bye it will be the same with nuclear fuel they will still go nowhere from the point of view of their energy sector this is no longer a russian nuclear energy weapon so i expect that at least partial sanctions will

be applied to russia in the near future and from the european union and the united states, and the second reason why the wave is so helpless and will not do anything is really the need to control the state of nuclear security if they refuse to cooperate from russia at many nuclear facilities, it will be impossible, so there is no need to wait for some political steps to be taken, it is necessary to talk about it with the european union, we are united states, and it is my world that must go through the first tough and successive steps, but definitely not to refuse , let's also remember belarus, because on january 16, the flight training of the military of

russia and the republic of belarus began, two days before that, kyiv was attacked by s-300 and s400 missiles, but there was no clear answer to where they were flying from these rockets, which i remind you, fly at a speed of 34,000 km/h and from the conditional northern border of either belarus or the e of russia where the bryansk region borders chernihiv region, this rocket flies for a few minutes, we do not have time to do anything, our air defense simply well, they are powerless, because they are populist rockets, they are flying , we didn’t explain that, and we didn’t say whether it was from belarus or whether it was flying from russia in the current situation - this is fundamental for ukraine. why am i asking because from belarus, unlike russia, in we maintain diplomatic

relations, and in principle, ukraine should somehow react in this situation if the belarusians are involved in this. well, then it must be said that all the targets from which these s300 and s400 are launched on the territory of the republic of belarus will be hit because it is legal the goal in a war waged by one country or two countries against one, there are several points for the first time. i don’t see how the esterista can get kiev from the territory of russia. they have to say where the s-400 missiles came from, but most likely from the territory of belarus, again , the military has to say the second

one. were constantly from the territory in belarus, our own invasion started from the territory of belarus, so here it is just a question in politics, do we think that by maintaining this minimal diplomatic contact we can somehow influence the belarusians ? i am not saying lukashenka personally, but someone in belarus to reduce for us the threat, if this is so, then the solution is actually difficult to understand , but nevertheless it is political. it can be at least partially, certainly not emotionally, certainly not in a military sense, but nevertheless, in a

political sense, it is justified. i believe that all the goals for us are argentine. and how is it not legitimate on the territory of russia, the hygiene of the territory of belarus is an enemy, there is an enemy, and there can be no discussion at all, everything is very simple, meanwhile, in belarus, the accounting of military servicemen has been completed, social networks they shouted about the covert mobilization of the republic of belarus, belarusian television explained that this measure was necessary to strengthen the state's defense capabilities , let's look at the results of the work carried out on top of the registration data, more than 95% of the soldiers who are required have passed, i want to note that on each at the stage, we were honest and open. we also convinced ourselves after one time that our people

understand me and are highly responsible for measures to strengthen the turnover of our state . to the tactical training of the armed forces of belarus and russia, you see bread and salt, well, that is, uh, peace. the friendship between belarusians and russians, well, belarusians, it seems to me that they do not feel this difference at all. what uh russians are aggressors and occupiers on the territory of ukraine and uh. this is the desire to be with the russians and russia all the time. which is stronger

than belarus prevails over anything. won't they go to the extent that the belarusian leadership controls the situation in the republic and can it not be that through the head of the same lukashenka in the literal sense of the word, russia will once again use belarus as a springboard for an attack on ukraine, first of all i i believe that belarusians feel the difference. far from all, but a part of belarusians do, and this is the reason and basis for trying to maintain at least the minimum important contact with them. what kind of important contact is possible under the conditions of the dictatorship of the regime that

exists in belarus in belarus have a different mentality than russia, but, unfortunately, fundamental instrumentality than ours, that's why here, when we fight with the russian regime, to make sure that our security is at least one iota better than the territory of belarus, for this, the second one is suitable moment eh, well, we understand very well that eh, for lukashenka, eh, taking part in this war means the end means the end of this regime , in this way putin will frame him and then get rid of him most likely also means his personal end there so that he

putin did not answer which part of those in belarus who understands what this war means for them, that it will destroy them and who does not want to go to this war is definitely eh whether this part is independent enough to adjust to russian pressure, it is difficult to say today. i see in some areas what is desired there is a way to resist russia, but it is so very, very mysterious. the russians are controlling more and more. in fact, i think that they really, really want to swallow up lukashenko in belarus, get rid of him or appoint him to some pytha-potemkin-like position there and have belarus for themselves, and here everything we can we

do so that the belarusians do not become an organic part of russia. this includes the issue of our security, so with whom to work there is definitely uh. can we use this potential? well, not today, let's be honest, it's difficult. but nevertheless, it's a start full-scale war with belarus means that we also have something to answer for and our friends too. well, putin instructed gerasimov to seize donbass by march 2023, well, at least that's what andrii yusov, a representative of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense, says about the next deadlines that putin determines already for gerasim and for the new head, well, the new old head of the sbu, and in fact, the war against

ukraine and gerasim in this goal already lowers the goal of capturing donbas and forming a certain security zone there already march of this month, well, they are donbass. i mean, russians have already during the last month captured russia day, then some other days, easter, yes, other dates symbolic for russia, what does the desire of the russians to get the don as soon as possible mean for for us and for the world, why am i asking now because we know that there will be another meeting at rammstein and uh these leopards and also the challengers that uh the british are already providing us come to ukrainians

because everyone understands that this spring , the fate of the russian-ukrainian war will be decided, the fate of the war is decided every day, this is not a slogan here, i don't have a day's work about that , what order did putin give to gerasimova, i also talk to my friends and western colleagues. but of course he wants to do it as soon as possible. i think that even if he gives such an order to the daf, it should be clear to the russian military that if they cannot take bakhmut, then we have further fortifications of the area and we have a consistent support with new ones we have our own weapons, the armed forces of ukraine, so

we will leave it to putin to solve endless orders and theorize our army, but in fact, i think that the most important thing for us today is a strategy, a strategy shared with the west, what and when we can plan it defense, but the main thing in terms of our counterattacks is that it should be a common story, as you and i said, it is a joint victory, and i really hope that from these rammstein meetings , you said at the beginning that there are 40 countries, there should actually be more such a clear strategy of what to do first half a year, how to support the military, how to support strategically, how to support the economic well, also the secretary of the united states blinking will be in beijing on february 5-6, if

i'm not mistaken, i think there will also be a strategic discussion. and after that, the chinese will once again have to explain to putin what to do such a war as he is waging is actually a road to nowhere, i really hope that this time they explain to him in more understandable terms these days, mr. pavlo, the davy forum is taking place, of course the russians did not go there because they are there nobody wants to see it, but the chinese didn't go there either. well, medvedev, sitting in moscow, says that it's a disgrace that they are discussing the supply of tanks to ukraine at the davos forum, it's good that there is no russian or chinese business, said dmitry medvedev russians go there. no one is waiting for the chinese. because of solidarity, they didn’t go there. i

’ll tell you what actually happened. almost none of the american officials are there. in fact, davos is no longer such a classic venue where business people and experts gather there. changed, the chinese also did not go to davos but i think that this is absolute conscious logic, they meet on different platforms, chinese business has no restrictions on communication with western russian business thank god that it did not succeed and i really hope that its dispute will not actually be anywhere except e -e russia and satellite countries of russia and i also very much hope that after the negotiations american-chinese-russian business

will become less in china, especially in the field of high technologies, so that high technologies do not fall into the circumvention of sanctions to russia, so i in fact, i absolutely did not compare the presence of russian business and the presence of chinese business, and in the end, the equipment to the car is a platform for discussion, but by no means a platform for decision-making, which, by the way, it has never been. by the way, a message just appeared that the chairman the arlein foundation of the european commission has successfully announced that the eu sanctions will plunge the russian economy into a decade-long recession. well, i think this is exactly why the reaction in the kremlin, in particular, medvedev, well, that is, the europeans are already openly telling them to the russians, how will this all end for them? do you

understand to the end, russians, how this will end for them? i think that part of the russian clans understands well, it understands that under today's conditions in russia, where it is going nowhere, the very perception of russia is fundamentally mistaken, if at the beginning of the war there is someone on the west once hoped that it would be possible to talk with russia at least in a conceptual way, but now no one hopes that russia is seen as an ivanshita regime. well, all the goals that are declared today in the kremlin are actually, if you change the words, these are the goals of the nazi regime were declared and what is the west, the protection of the russian language, the same west is the german language , the necessity of the seizure of new territories and the

combination of the necessity of the expansion simply for the existence of this empire, it’s all the same. correction for the russian specificity with er russian russian terms with russian terminology therefore, now the russian regime er actually in what it does and in what it wants to do is becoming more and more like a mixture of mussolini and even more and more like the nazi regime and this no more effort it's just an emotional thing to say, it's actually a reality, that's why it's a part of russian relics who are used to making money in russia and spending it somewhere, they miss that now you can only go to istanbul and in a coupe. thank you, go back to the

world. thank you, it 's definitely going nowhere. of the end it was pavlo klimkin politician diplomat yes glory of ukraine thank you and actually friends i say goodbye to you already until tomorrow by 1 pm there will be another verdict let's talk about the situation that is developing in ukraine on the eastern on the southern fronts well, of course, let's talk and follow what's happening in belarus . take care of yourself and your loved ones. until tomorrow , all the best. i just found a working store in three letters. it's closed. i don't have a light. please, this bouquet is so lucky. it doesn't disappear in our country. so here's a generator on the streets are buzzing ukrainian

veteran background money the fund helps veteran enterprises i wonder what is needed for this and only fop and ubd this is for example how my husband and i have a family business up to uah 20,000 they give it i understand great thank you for a bouquet of support for the ukrainian veteran business now, find out the details on the website or by phone number war raised its head again in europe, reminding us of the darkest hours of our history frantz 24 constantly covers events in ukraine our team on the ground and in the studio will inform you about the dynamics of events and the price is more

current by franz 24 in ukrainian on espresso weltrum battery stations are designed specifically for military needs , sealed, shockproof, work in difficult weather conditions, these stations will significantly increase fighting capacity of our defenders, the espresso tv channel, together with the forpo tua charity fund, launched a new fundraiser for the purchase of powerful portable battery stations with solar panels for our soldiers , we will hand over the first five stations to the 406th separate artillery brigade named after cornelius general oleksiy almazov, join the fundraiser, we will bring victory closer together glory to ukraine

is cozy kherson pearl of protected territories of ukraine the city played a significant role in the creation of statehood became the southern center of the ukrainian revival during of great terror, nkvdists shot almost thousands of people for nationalism, and the kherson leadership of the oun, led by bohdan bandera , actively fought against the german invaders, because an angry kherson citizen will go out against the enemy column with his bare hands, but he will not bow down to the occupier kherson unconquered