or on pressure, but on breathing, we can, that is, we breathe deeper, deeper, we breathe more calmly, this is the first, second, tunnel vision, under stress, a person sees only what scares him and fixates on it, and if he is hypnotized by this, expand, pay attention to the periphery, or if you are helping someone, just change the topic, translate looking at something is the second moment and the third moment or imagine the body feeling hm and the third moment - it's just drink tea eat cookies turn on digestion and thus switch to the parasympathetic nervous system which will extinguish stress this is during stress but after the stress, when it has already happened, if we turn to the british system that is used in the british army, it is not grimberg that developed the system. he talked about

stress factors and resources, the idea is to add resources in any way and reduce stress in any way -factor thank you very much , be sure to anyone who is interested in atlant in telegram, look for professional psychologists for the military and civilians, they will definitely help you andrii belchenko was the head of the psychological support center atlant, and later on the express broadcast, the verdict was given by serhiy rudenko let's watch glory to ukraine, this program is the verdict, my name is serhiy rudenko. good day and good health to all. today, january 19, is the 330th day of the heroic resistance of the ukrainian people to the russian occupiers. zelensky doubts that putin is alive, and therefore the president of ukraine does not understand with whom to enter into negotiations. this is what he said today on at the ukrainian breakfast in davos, kuleb and reznikov ask the west to provide ukraine with tanks and warn of a possible

new one. meanwhile, the russian army continues to lose manpower and equipment in ukraine, as of the morning of january 19, russia has lost 118,530 people in ukraine in the last day alone, the armed forces of ukraine destroyed 760 orks at the beginning of the great war, the russians have already lost in ukraine 3,136 tanks, 6,235 armored combat vehicles, 2,122 artillery systems - that's 442 volley fire systems 220 air defense systems 287 airplanes 277 helicopters 4896 units of motor vehicles 17 ships boats 749 cruise missiles 1882 drones 190 units of special equipment is president lavrov alive putin does not know how to live on and he says that russia is not

may lose this war and scholz will give tanks to ukraine but after the united states of america we will talk about this for the next hour i want to introduce our guest today - this is oleksandr khara, an expert on foreign and security policy at the center for defense strategies and thank you for joining our broadcast. good afternoon, mr. serhiy, it is very nice to be on your broadcast, so let's start today's statements, because many foreign colleagues are calling me in the morning and saying that he said this zelenskyi in davos about what he said putin is already dead, uh, but dead i immediately gave up. to be honest, these are the statements of zelenskyi, although these uh, questions about uh, whether putin is alive or dead, were rather rhetorical questions. let's take a fragment and see what he said in

old president zelensky today i don't quite understand how to speak and be transparent, i'm not sure that the president of russia appears in the end, well, but since the war, tv people will understand on chromate and somewhere he appears i don't quite understand who it is i don't quite i fully understand that he is alive or that he makes the decision or who makes the decision that it was the axis. i don't have such information. i don't quite understand how you can promise european leaders one thing and the next day they started one by themselves. invasion of the state i just don't quite understand we deal with everything. so, president zelenskyi said that he does not understand with whom to hold peace talks, what mr. oleksandr means to

the world, and that the world also does not understand with whom to hold negotiations in this situation. well, i do not think that president zelenskyy has a clear data about that that putin, who was elected 20 years ago or more than 20 years ago by the russians, that he is no longer alive, well, you know, i remembered not the movie, but kirkorosavy, where one of the lords, let’s say, died, and in order not to tear up his principality, the neighbors actually found with her just a person who pretended to be this for a certain time while they were deciding how to consolidate and, er, fight back. well, you know, in principle, there are a lot of rumors that there are some doppelgängers. well, what about the crooks, er, mr. president said, it is really true, we have seen meeting with the owners several times there or with the flight attendants that was recorded and

it was visible that he was mounted because he is paranoid from the point of view of safety and physical from the point of view of his health there is probably a certain nuance well, but i think that most likely it is metaphorical in this way, mr. president said such a thing first that well, i'm ready for victory, because you remember all the time we were told in the west that now we've won here, so in this operation let's sit down - you'll sit behind the arrow of the negotiations, you've liberated kherson, this is a good opportunity, so with the russians somehow there about something come to an agreement and this is just a tribute because the president says that ukraine is ready to talk with russia, the truth is that the only thing that is unclear is with whom, since putin is with putin and lavrov recently stated that the only condition for the start of negotiations is that ukraine recognized the situation on the ground, almost all of which means illegal the annexation of ukrainian territories, and it is certain that russia wants negotiations on how to further dismantle

ukrainian statehood and strengthen russian influence in ukraine, and it is certain that this is not acceptable, on the other hand, the president ukraine cannot say that i will not talk to anyone about anything, because since this is, well, let's say yes, not accepting such conditions, because then in the west they will say well, you, uh, you say, you agree to depend, we want as soon as possible not to suffer ukrainians know everything too, this is the form. let's say that this is a double standard, and that's why we can stop it. thank god, this does not happen, but such hints were heard constantly, at least until recently, and it is also unclear who he consults with. because we saw reshuffling as a military eh i mean directly officially those who are responsible for armed aggression eh and unofficial ones first of all the growth in popularity and power of mr. prigozhin eh hm of course there are still factors that should also

be taken into account who found that on putin’s ears what is happening in u the world and actually what should he do, of course he makes the decision himself but someone does not bring this information to his ears and in fact, in this way the president showed that i don't know who to deal with well, what's more, he has nothing to talk about since they are just now able, well, regarding the conditions themselves, we know that uh, and the laurels of putin are talking about that well, the two theses that they defend, firstly, that with his decree of the president, zelensky refuses and refused negotiations with russia, we know that there is such a decree that introduced in the effect of the decision of the national and defense council that until the withdrawal of russian troops from the territory of the ukrainian state there can be no peace negotiations, this is the first thesis that the russians promote, they say that well, what do you want if zelensky himself does not want to negotiate, it is from one side and from the other

on the other hand, they say that there are some territorial realities, as they say new territorial realities, and ukraine has these territorial realities, let's accept the minister of foreign affairs of russia, sergei lavrov , said yesterday that there is no question of negotiations with ukraine but what is interesting is that he said that he does not know what life in russia will be like after the war, this is a very beautiful quote . he forbade negotiations with the russian government, when you are over, the war

will end. in the future , it will be possible to live in prison or something similar, because lavrov in this situation says that we have no other way out, how to defeat ukraine, defend their legal rights, as they all think in quotes, but he does not know how to live on. it seems to me what it is absolutely a thesis and this saying says that the current leadership of russia is in a complete misunderstanding, i really a and how to continue to live how to continue to live in the world that is around or not so definitely, well, first of all

, they really have no choice but to defeat ukraine, they just understood that the big strategic mistake they made when they invaded ukraine on a large scale on february 24, because if they had done what they had been doing since 2014, they would have had more success, because the sanctions somehow worked there , they forgot about us, then there were some other things we were secondary on the world agenda, and now we actually see such a unity that we really haven't seen in a long time on the european continent regarding the fact that russia at least should not win, most of our closest neighbors say that ukraine should win and the old europe there is hesitating between russia did not lose and it was not won that something like that is actually one story and accordingly in order to somehow survive i began to redirect and rearrange my system to the east. they said for a very long time about the growth of asia that they would play some kind of

role, but in fact they always dreamed of dominating europe, and now it is simply impossible for them. since we see that the russian agency is being thrown out. and actually there is no such energy hook. here it is very interesting literally there when yesterday or the day before yesterday punky serzhak said such a thing our western partners have certain illusions and he said that if russia perceives that this war is going on it is precisely against russia as such that it can rethink its certain nuances of approaches, first of all, this is the attractiveness of european culture, but for some reason there still believe that it is part of european civilization and that it is more interesting for them to be part of the west and not the east, we know

that between the chinese and russians are a much bigger gap even than ukrainians are russians. after this war, that is, they are completely incompatible civilizations and they have completely different goals, and russia cannot be a harmonious part of asia, it is simply not capable of it, well moreover, i am not talking about the competitiveness of china, which for decades has double-digit growth in gdp. i am not talking about the asian tigers and others, that is, the russians are competitive . thank god for reconsideration both in the political session and in the cultural and most importantly in the scientific and historical, including that the world was doing wrong, first of all the western looked at central eastern europe eyes of russia and he it turned out that even reading dostoyevsky and having volumes of dostoyevsky or tolstoy

on the table, they did not understand russia, and that is precisely why they are being rebuilt, and now it seems to me. and in universities, let's say so, before there were solitologists, then slavists, and now i don't know how they are will be named who will deal with russia, this er is changing and that is exactly why in this world russia feels quite uncomfortable and it seems to me that the minister er lavrov said about it well, probably these people who will know or at least they will guess what the russians want, they will be called the russian soviets or something like that, well, in kissinjam, among others , which you mentioned. he said that this seems to me to be the first time from his public speeches. he said that ukraine should be part of nato. other not given we remember that in 2014 the same end already spoke about the fact that it is not impossible and in general well

, we cannot talk about ukraine's accession to the north atlantic alliance. 100 years why he suddenly changed his position. well, you know, i wouldn't exaggerate his words, well , they took out some other snuff boxes again and he actually said the same thing he said a year ago. the only thing he added was this question about nato, and i'll just go through the points. first of all, he says that it is necessary, either by force of arms or by agreement, to stop at the e-e line. let 's say a cease-fire at the beginning of the war, and of course he meant the 22nd year and the year 2014, and it's definitely not profitable for us , especially since such support and having such the public resource is aimed at not being ready for victory, and you give us the so-called compromises, i.e. give up your sovereignty and a

part of the territory. the second point he actually says is that american and western support should even increase until the moment when this truce is not reached. and actually after that, well, that is, if i read his words, i interpret his words as a bureaucrat , yes, that is, i know the weight of these bureaucratic formulations, that is, after the ceasefire, the support should stop, this will also say something. so he says that the sanctions have to be in russia until the conflicts are finally resolved, somehow we will settle it there somehow with an agreement, but he is also a bit deceitful. since we understand that the text is the so-called appetite of our western partners to support sanctions, it can decrease, which means that it is inversely proportional, let's say so, to the urgency of supporting ukraine or that is, the

horrors that are happening in our country, that is, if there are no hostilities, then there is also a desire to continue sanctions and suffer for the sake of the own population and the global economy as a whole, of course, this is confusion. next, he in fact, that is, roughly speaking, what will he propose? he proposes to forget crimea - it is definitely donetsk-luhansk, most likely. and then, so that there is no strengthening of ukraine as a factor, since the russians are talking about it. and by the way, the same group added to the list of claims and the start of a war against ukraine so that we don't have enough power. whatever might threaten the russian federation, he means primarily western weapons, and most importantly about nat. he said that there is no point in keeping ukraine neutral. and that's why it should become part of nato someday in the future, you know, bureaucrats when they write in the near future, it means almost never. actually, at this moment, we know that they will never refuse us to become nato members, since this will be a violation

of the very essence of the washington treaty, but on the other hand, there will always be countries that will hesitate from which or other reasons. we saw in 2008 how they did not give us an action plan regarding membership. and all the more so because now there are certain countries blocking even simple cooperation between ukraine and inata. and that is why there will always be an opportunity with different arguments , etc. are they ready for a military plan, are there democracies, or are there any other warnings? by the way, the drama is unfolding now, as turkey blocks the entry of finland into sweden's donation. the degree of ukraine in nato for a long time, and in this way, in fact, to play or pour water on the mill of russian and not ukrainian, it is actually therefore i would absolutely not perceive his words

as some uh, something has changed radically there moreover, thank god he is not listened to in the white house. well, against the background of these statements by kissinger, vladimir putin announced yesterday that the so-called special military operation was necessary in order to stop the war in ukraine. let's hear from putin. everything we do today, including special military operation - this is, as i have already said many times, the demand to end the war is so that the meaning of our operations is to protect the people who are our people who live there in these territories, these are our historical territories, as i already said after the collapse the soviet union will not be evaluated now, that is, german, not at the time, but in any case, russia has come to terms with this event, but eh , but not considering that these are our historical russian territories, but we have come to terms with the historical ones, but none

the less, no at least we couldn't react to what started to happen there after the coup d'état, when they started , in fact, to protest the people who live in these territories only because they consider themselves connected to russian culture and the russian language, well, a set of stamps pseudo-historical excursions into the fact that this is some kind of iskon on russian land, and by the way, lavrov, who yesterday announced that he compared russians with jews during the holocaust, there in israel they simply said that it was a delusion and an insult, and a word to them they look at the excuse me idiots who have nuclear weapons and threaten this with education, but here is putin lavrov in the current condition and, in general, the entire leadership of the russian federation, well, it is clear that something needs to be resolved with them, and this resolution comes through the victory of ukraine over russia, if i understand there is no

final consensus even among the representatives of the western elite that this victory must necessarily be otherwise we would have got tanks and planes and everything else. that is, why do you think the representatives of the western world are delaying a political decision, because this is a political decision to put an end to the russia we now have we see and what is now threatened in this world, you know well, first of all, only the sick imaginations of the russians, or soviet people, that the united states or the west as a whole slept and dreamed of taking over the soviet union or modern russia, what to do with it this is absolutely not the case, and let's remember again the speech of mr. bush the elder before the ukrainian parliamentarians, where he urged not to choose suicides, nationalism seems to have been such a phrase, and in this way he

wanted nuclear weapons and all that other chemical , bacteriological, and of course to remain under control in moscow, with whom, in principle, you can always agree on something. and in fact, now the west also perfectly understands that the loss of russia in this war will mean, well , turbulence that can lead to disintegration of this state again. there is a large amount of nuclear, chemical, and i am sure bacteriological weapons. although there are chemical and bacteriological weapons , russia celebrated there that they destroyed it all. i am not talking about conventional weapons, that is, the horror of what will happen to russia and the impossibility of imagining a world from well, with only the maresias or whatever they will be called. he is stopping our western partners, because of course they would like to see someone more or less moderate change there, but preferably the so-called liberals. that’s it, then you can. it would be good to

start something again with russia from a clean sheet, but we understand. well, you know . to be honest, this war, well, for the ukrainians, it was clear for the poles there or for other neighbors who remember the occupation, but for western europe, it is now from the face or grimace of russia atrocities that they commit and it is not some kind of special unit that is labeled as a nazi, well, there is an ss unit, yes. and this is a practice in every sense, plus the very society that supports this national war, and that is why, of course, from one on the one hand, they understand that ukraine must be supported, that this is a war to destroy ukraine, and on the other hand, they do not have a picture of the future of russia, they still cherish some hopes that a democratic russia is possible - this is an absolute myth and illusion . there will not be a final decision because there is no final decision and we are anticipating the

rammstein decision of the regular meeting of defense ministers of western countries, the so-called anti-putin coalition, representatives of the ukrainian government , minister of foreign affairs dmytro kuleba and of defense oleksiy reznikov issued a joint statement, they called on partners to provide tanks to ukraine and warned of the threat of a new offensive by the russian federation. the kremlin is determined to further intensify hostilities, an attempt to take revenge on russia for its failures in the war against ukraine, in particular, and the threat of a new full-scale offensive by russian forces is a very real possibility. we see during the last two days in davos, as representatives of western countries , former british prime minister johnson has been talking about the need to give tanks to ukraine says give ukraine tanks let's concentrate on ukraine and not on putin poland says it can give ukraine its leopard tanks without waiting for germany's consent

, polish prime minister marawiecki said in an interview with polsat tv channel at the same time we see the statement of the same olaf scholtz, who says that we leopards can provide ukraine, but for this the united states of america must provide ukraine with mr. abrams, that is, germany does not want to take full responsibility for sending ten percent there or how much they counted the leopards that are in europe, and there are about 2.5 or 3,000 tanks in all of europe. why does something in this situation put a... well, such a fork as in a chess combination, they say, well, it's just a fork, there will be leopards when there will be abrams... well, it seems that last week there was an article in the fenen shaltan about the fact that uh, well, let's say this, it's some kind of reflection by experts that actually he would like uh, such an umbrella from a nuclear state.

well, really, germany is not a nuclear power, although on its territory for so called extendy defense placed gravity bombs, which in the event of a conflict will be used against, well, first of all, the russian federation, to be honest, this is still a strange argument, because the same poland, the same finland, and the same spain, who said before that they were ready to provide a certain number of leopards, they are not nuclear states, but they are members of nato and nato itself and will protect them if there are any, let's say, high-quality, incomprehensible actions, the most important thing is that the united states already seems to have publicly started a month and a half ago to say that they support any decision of their allies in europe to provide any weapons so that ukraine has the opportunity to defend itself and just yesterday , one of the heads of the pentagon

visited here in kyiv. he said that well, we are not going to supply abrams for the simple reason that it is logistical, well, it is impractical, it is true that germany produces these tanks, i am the leopards, the first point, the second point, there are a sufficient number of them in various countries , first of all, germany seems to have 370, then spain is in second place, then finland, then poland, there are more than 200. and actually, that’s why it can be done faster than throwing it across the ocean. of course, there is another consideration . i think that the first thing is personal. well, let’s say the same . which council do i again, i constantly repeat, i will not name the names of one of the key advisers uh, whose strategy for the russian language directions failed even under the previous governments, he still

advises p we will have relations with russia after the war and not how quickly we provide weapons to ukraine, so let's say so, and advisers also play a certain role, because we see that in fact even in his own party people say so, we must take this step, we must show leadership to give ukraine an opportunity and we ourselves must strengthen . but there are caveats, and i think that they are of such a biological plan and of the world order more than any other, on the other hand, i am sure that more precisely, there is a high probability that they will push the envelope and tomorrow we will hear something very pleasant about the supply of tanks, since and there, in addition to the polish leader, the americans and the british joined, and it is certain that they will find good arguments in order to at least lift the ban on the

supply of these leopards from third countries, because as a country that manufactured, produced, supplied and exported these tanks, it has give consent to the transfer or sale of tanks of any third country well, just now information appeared from reuters with reference to american officials that today lloyd austin - the head of the pentagon will try to press for a new minister of defense of the federal republic of germany, boris pistorius, and for him to give permission for the transfer of german tanks to ukraine. at the same time, schultz spoke in davos yesterday. he said that the war should end , that russia must lose, and in addition, he said that x is a turning point in the politics of the federal republic germany, since germany has become completely independent of russian gas, coal and oil, well , really very tectonic shifts are happening because the russian federation, led by putin

, they were convinced that europe would never will drop from russian gas, but we can see what this year's winter is, fortunately for us and for our european partners, and we can see how germany quite quickly adjusted there in 11 or 12 months to e-e export of e-e products that are supplied to import of products supplied to germany, how far do you think the germans can go in the confrontation with russia, because russia also feels the confrontation and they constantly reproach the germans, of course , including the second world war, well first of all, germany has no choice ; in fact, the choice of russia was made by the russian federation and