from the beginning of the full-scale invasion, i understood for myself that this war will not end very quickly, although i have no doubt that this war will end with our victory and mr. petro very clearly said that either we them or they us yes yes they us definitely no definitely we them only the question of the price that ukraine will pay for our victory because for us the price of victory is important because for us every human life is important for us every person is important every soldier is extremely necessary and must be protected in this and there is a difference of this the battle of civilizations, because it was not just ukraine and russia that came together, people with european values ​​came together with the horde, and this makes us very different. i am convinced that they will have the next mobilization

. because they are like that, they are so trained, and that is why we fight because we are different and everyone fights for their own, but i want to say once again that i have no doubt that this war will end with our victory, this is not optimism to throw hats like in march months when i understood that the situation is very difficult, and from the tv screens i heard that tomorrow, if not in the morning, then tomorrow after lunch there will be a ukrainian victory parade on red square in moscow. i am convinced that we will win for two reasons. the first reason is this unity and great the power inside ukraine and no actions of the muscovites can break our faith in victory and this is the most important thing because the ukrainians will win in this war the second

component of our victory this is the help of the west, but i have already seen some information about tomorrow's meeting in rammstein and in fact it will be more one big step even compared to the aid that the united states of america gave us, remember the last amount - this is $3 billion worth of equipment, an unprecedented amount. moreover, today we understand that the next package of military aid from the united states will again be substantial and will again very quickly and indeed today there was already a conversation about the fact that the lion 's share is armored personnel carriers of course we would very much like them to be tanks, to be tanks in huge quantities, to be well, if not f-35, then f-16 for sure, but we must understand that it will still be step by step, i am very pleased that how many

ukrainian soldiers are undergoing training today, it is not enough to get patriot complexes, we still need to have people who can use them and i understand that not only the states, not only germany, but the netherlands will provide us with at least three batteries of patriots, what will we have and additional opportunities to close our sky? i am convinced that tomorrow a decision will be clearly made and not just announced when poland hands over 14 leopard tanks. we have already we have a clear statement from great britain about challenger 2 tanks. i understand that this is the beginning, because probably tomorrow rammstein will also transfer equipment related to the weapons of the former soviet union standards. i mean the t-72 titans that were in the countries of the former warsaw pact in eastern europe and which we need, that is, what

is ukraine preparing for ? has developed over the past months. why are our western allies increasing the amount of aid so quickly in recent weeks because they feel that the muscovites are also preparing a counteroffensive, that the muscovites are also concentrating their strike groups on our eastern territories in order to advance and in order to oppose them, exactly the power of this is needed last week it so happened that i had the opportunity to be among our soldiers in the slavyansk kramatorsk region, in the kupyansk region and in the yampol region, you know what is most important most important

not even this equipment, the most important thing is those guys who are standing very close to the collision line today, their spirit, their conviction, and for us who are here today in lviv 1000 km away , who are in kyiv, who are in odesa, it is very important to help everything that depends on us to help these guys support them and it is imperative to help their families, their families should feel, first of all, protected, and secondly, that those relatives who are fighting should have support, they should have help, they should have understanding. this is our task and i am convinced that this synergy of ukrainian society will definitely give us an opportunity for a counter- offensive, which is extremely important at this time, the secretary of the national security and

defense council of ukraine says that the next months of 2023 will be difficult and even difficult. he will be on our air later and we will be able to to talk about it too, but here i go. yes, the president of poland, who came to lviv, also visited ukraine, but his quote, which we will look at now, was said in davos. we also tried to check it because, well, what he said, it actually sounds like that, it's quite difficult for us to hear that in ukraine we need weapons, weapons, and once again, weapons, ah, weapons are of decisive importance here, we absolutely agree with everything, it is important to send military support now, especially modern tanks, missiles for protection, but first of all to to stop the russian offensive, will this be enough? i'm afraid, i'm afraid that no, what we have already sent is not enough . the key moment of the war and this moment will answer whether ukraine will survive or not. well, it hurts us to hear when

when talking about us like this we will survive. these victories we had last year and now it seems that the year began with such sad tragic events but it is clear that we cannot give up well, if we take it from such a small perspective, then our most difficult months have already been, they were very difficult months, april, may, june, july , when the high-mars started to work, there was a little bit of hope, a feeling of strength. besides, believe me, the months were far from easy, and now we fully understand what awaits us, we are ready, now we have no the army is not even in the quantity and quality that we had and we don't have to think about what to monitor, of course you understand to monitor, to scout what the

enemy is planning, we have to think now where to get weapons, how to prepare the devils, how to resist this is the key question, how much will we grind them, will they collect three, 300,000 and 400 , or half a million, we have no influence on that, we have to think about how to give an answer, this is now the key question, and we need to work on it, we are adding to our conversation a military expert, already an ex-advisor, hm, chairman office managers of president andriy yermak, as andriy yermak calls himself oleksiy arrestovych, who this week wrote a resignation letter after one of the marshmallows. i understand correctly, and then this missile hit the dnipro entrance, now oleksii, before we move on to the conversation with you about the situation at the front well, i still

uh, we understand that the interest in your person this week, what was it like very high, and in connection with this situation, you wrote an application for dismissal. but did you communicate in any way with mr. yermak, with the office of the president, how did they react in conversations with you to your application, well, it was roughly like this. good evening to everyone first of all, what mr. yarmak said, how do you assess what happened? i say this is a gross and fundamental mistake on my part, which caused certain and quite big problems for the country in the tsarist propaganda. it had no legal consequences. the matter is clear . he asks what do you think is necessary, i say i have a way out, if it is a gross fundamental error well,

then there must be a delivery, i wrote immediately and immediately wrote a resignation letter, i resigned well, they are satisfied there in the next few hours, what are your plans next , what do you plan to do all the same, i'm used to being as efficient as possible, i summarized what i did on february 16, will return from february 24 to january 16 well, only on my youtube channel 267 million e-e unique views 61 million one m-m uh-e who watched it, well, really. this is dozens of times more because it is only my channel, barely a fourth or a fifth of them got on it. just look at the amount per reach i don't know for example, modern history, so that it was like that, we came

yesterday, he said, he gave an assessment. he said that youtube should be banned in russia because, um , two broadcasts are being watched, and so on. and so on. buildings of the administration of the president of the russian federation. we never choose. i knew what they were watching, that's why i focused mainly on the russian-speaking audience on the russian audience . with the prefix x or without without the word adviser in front let's say yes i'm just asking why i think it would be unwise and unwise to deprive the country of such a resource i'm asking because our editors found your quote on january 31, 2021 where you said i don't believe the invasion if i'm wrong then i will honestly say that i made a mistake and will go to the front, that's why i'm just in the context of this, i'm not sending anyone to the front in any way, but still, maybe you have such plans now, that would also be fine but

i'm at the front, the informational psychological front - of course, this is not a war. in the trenches, but this is a very important part of the front. i think that everyone needs to prove themselves. this is completely clear . look, as an officer, i am used to being trained to be where i am most effective. what do you think in general if i go to the front now and get rid of possibilities, let's say yes, continue informational psychologists , psychological activity, will it be better for a country with a constitution? well, we need to sober up , it's cold, so let's think, everything stops , this whole story with the fact that i'm giving you the fact that i support the psychological a huge number of people and i am starting to do something there somewhere as a lieutenant colonel, for example, a combat unit. well, my battalion will be fine. my neighbors will be fine. but it is not millions of people. you just imagine these numbers. i am not showing off, i am just thinking about how the parties know what to

just look at. i didn't even know what i had, i checked the statistics and realized that this is a powerful thing and it should not be stopped. if you are talking about the informational and psychological front , then we are here, well, we must remember your interview also which was recently released on ramina’s youtube channel. there is such a youtube channel. some of our viewers don’t know, but i think they know because it was heard and there were quite a lot of statements from you, which, in particular, by ukrainian-speaking ukrainians, although they ask not to speak like that, but simply by ukrainians were perceived quite ambiguously, some in social networks called it pure manipulation, playing on and even russia, our enemy, because it sounded quite so provocative, but i just want to ask you if you understood when you answered these questions that's right, that is, let's just give some quotes. we have always had everything built in such a way that an

ideology that is close to the residents of the three western regions, they tried to impose on someone donetsk, luhansk crimea. the language is the language of the occupier or the language of the orcs or something like that well hmm do you really think so, that is, if you said that, then you probably think so, but you understand how dangerous these statements are because they are actually used by the russian federation as well let's go in order, first of all, a lot of ukrainian-speaking ukrainians supported what i said there, read the comments, the vast majority of them are ukrainian-speaking comments, because the interview is in ukrainian, russians simply can't understand what they're talking about, that's why they supported exclusively ukrainian first or mainly separately, secondly , if my words are torn into quotes, then of course i am on the headlines, as telegram channels make or other laughter, then of course it can

become 90 with voices on my feet and arestovych will seem the worst enemy and why do they quote when i say there that the ukrainian language and culture should be a priority, that every ukrainian, regardless of the region, should have, should have, and we should educate him on a national level, precisely the identification where he says that he is a ukrainian, he must know the ukrainian language ukrainian history , the law, and so on, why this situation and many other things, so that the budgetary culture of science and education should be no less than the military one, because we are on this. as well as quotes from my interviews and all interviews in the same way, but they are never taken and only a separate one is quoted. these are the kind of quotes that can be carried around there and so on regarding the three western regions. well , come on, we are adults, adults, when bandera

they hand over the hero without the previous company, which, let's say, explains to the residents of eastern or southern ukraine, who were brought up by their parents for many years, that bandera is the worst thing that can happen like this, the historical one is not made, bandera is definitely a hero, they began to say once again on the shores but if we think strategically within the framework of the state, then it must be done smoothly with the transition of air forces, the sharp fluctuations of society do not lead to anything. and except for the increase in internal tension and falling on us in a very well-known plot, the black council, which constantly pursues us and which, by the way, has always been the basis of our guarantee of our defeats. we want to repeat this scenario. no, i want ukrainians to be united and fight together against the enemy, who is far from ending the war and is ready for great spirits. well

, quote me in full, then if you proceed if i say that i will be there for 40 minutes to two hours, then i will talk about the ukrainian general national identification, how important it is, critically, that we should all be ukrainians, understand each other, know the language, of course, a lot of content is needed, and so on, but that's how they take rema and then arestovych, the enemy of the people. well, where is the conscience, where is the conscience, why do they always quote only provocative things or things that become about them are quoted so that they become provocative? of course, the fact is that anyone can and has the opportunity to watch this interview in its entirety and draw their own conclusions. there are simply things that you , in particular, also emphasized in it. well, they are perceived quite well, if it is contradictory , in particular, the fact that tabachnyk is ukrainian-speaking and yet he is a traitor to the expressing the opinion that ukrainian-speakers can also be traitors to ukraine, that there are many russian-speakers fighting in the east, although we have never

denied this, but in the context of this i want to ask you, what exactly is the issue of language - what separates us? on your the idea around what we should unite then, what unites us ukrainians when i said that the issue of language is that we agree , this is the context that i have formed . for the opportunity that you give me. i never said why it was separated. i say that language is what should unite us at the level of nationalization of ukrainian exams. who are they in ukraine? what is the language they ask first of all, if there is no ukrainian language at all, what is the matter with what to build this same medication and so on, you, you, i got used to it, i got used to it in 8 years, when i myself was represented by the sbu once in writing , i was never quoted as i

actually said to ani in titles and so on. well, since i do not officially hold a position now, i can say a little more i want to say frankly well, i want to say that you have to have a conscience quoting me and other people i never said and it is not important that i said i am a ukrainian officer i can never say that who swear you to the people of ukraine not to the authorities of ukraine but to the people of ukraine that the ukrainian language disconnected and what are you you say that, how is it even possible? and what did i fight for at the front, what am i fighting for now, even the informational and psychological front, so that there would be no ukrainian language, or did it matter to us, or how ? there is a question in the studio, but i want it now without quoting and er any previous interviews, but in this context i think that this question is now er painful and, including in the west of ukraine, it is perceived one by one i i am sure that in

kharkiv it is completely different or even that to the dnipro itself, and this must also be acknowledged , particularly on our broadcast, once the secretary of the national security and defense council, mr. danilov, who will also be on the air today, said that there is no russian language on the territory of ukraine at all, and how do you see the future of the russian language on the territory of ukraine , and i will explain my question because we understand that one way or another there are now people who switch to ukrainian but still communicate in russian what are the stages if it is not there if you support it if you don't then tell me what you think about it what is the reason for the disappearance of the russian language on the territory of ukraine, so that the russian language will constantly become less special after the defeat of russia? which is not located in the zone in the zone of influence of the russian federation or in zone 30, which they say. and

if they recognize this in me, they stop the cultural influence here, then the russian language will become less, on the other hand, this is a very divanent thing. well, according to certain statistics, which sources have revealed that more than 10 million citizens of ukraine have relatives in the russian federation , or can the russian language finally and quickly disappear, if such a number of fourth or every fourth ukrainian has relatives in the russian federation, they cannot, let’s be honest, this is not a historical development and there are consequences the fact that russia and i were part of one state for 400 years, it cannot disappear in a year, in four years, even 10 years, no matter how much we would like it, no matter how much we cut russia off with us, as far as the stages are concerned we need to act as in the west, what strategic plans do we have, what do we want from ukraine in general, how do we understand it, we see that if

we go to the eu, then to the eu. remove the russian language from here, clash with the eu legislation, because there they look at these things a little differently and we have to decide why we could or would not contradict at home. this is a difficult question. i am a supporter of strategic planning for decades in order to each new president did not change the vector of external and internal policy, we must adopt the state strategy at the state level as a state law, adhere to it, it must be built as a result of a professional nationwide discussion, what kind of country are we building, if we build one option there, then we must stop the existence of russian here in others of my languages, leave only ukrainian, translate it into latin, for example, and we will all forget the russian language in a generation, even sign cyrillic for this, i will forget if we are another country i will be open to society, society,

diversity there, a society that is capable of accepting migrants, and this is being discussed because there are huge problems with demography and so on , so the insiders say not as the proponents say that ukraine, in order to aim and simply get such a territory, will be forced to accept migrants, then this automatically means diversity a multicultural society is multi-layered and so on, what are we building, what plans are we making, and it is not you and i in the studio who should be responsible, but should be responsible as a result of a nationwide international professional discussion, not specialists should form together with the government with the regional government , society, society, society, a strategic plan to build countries in one version of an open european society in the russian language will be another, there is bulgarian, hungarian, there we have armenian, azerbaijani, and so on , crimean-tatar will have its own place a if you are in the best case, you will be persecuted. what do you think yasik will say to persecute only one and only one language and limit yourself to this same panther resource, a

complete contradiction to human rights, and we will legislation that exists and stable practices and understanding of civilization of civilization and so on and so on and so on my position is simple and expressed many times my personal i do not pretend to fastiv my oleksiiovych ukrainian maximum support for the rest of the freedom to build on the level of arts and so on just another quote from you you say that we don't quote you like that, but i will still read it. why do we still have this idiotic, completely idiotic law that imposes fines for not using the ukrainian language in everyday life or for providing services and so on. he turns us into snitches. this is the technology of the nkvd. we must be complete . look at what is the question in this quote specifically, well, in our country, no one is fined or

imposed any sanctions for not using the ukrainian language in everyday life, you know it, you know it, you just said it, and it is not true . daily life or whether in it himself or in business is, well, providing services in everyday life, these are completely different things, this is what russian-speaking people are afraid of, russian-speaking ukrainians, calling us westerners, what are we? well , by inventing such laws, supporting them, we are, as it were. manipulation, a russian-speaking ukrainian, previously your question was against and i am not afraid of anyone, i use the ukrainian language and i gave my children to the executive of ukraine for physical strength, which was specially when there was still an opportunity and schools to practice the russian language it was a long time ago

and i can tell you that in fact in ukraine , in my opinion, no one is afraid anymore, well, everyone knows this is an attempt by moscow propaganda to use it, as you can see, they did not use it because this question according to their polls no longer works in ukraine, that is there is no point in appealing to him, they will move on to other issues now eh. as for me, i was also asked, after acetating danilov, that the russian language should disappear in general, yes, it should disappear, or can it be used in everyday life. you have contradictions that you and i cannot resolve now, oleg serhiyevich, as for the fact that we are trained to be enough for each other, where is it true that there is a provision for signals from citizens of blitel according to this legislation that someone there did not use this law during service in the provision of services i do not want to be counted on this behind the scenes of the nkvd products, this would mean in a real sense the brigade of the russian federation this terrible kyiv machine is terrible not human i want

that for the ukrainian language i want and use encouraged that those who use it and learn it go into russian-speaking citizens, business, and so on, so that they want to, because this is already collective psychology, that's how it works, understand the punishments individually, they cannot force anyone to change themselves, or they will not cause an infection and cause only opposition or deaf and deaf dissatisfaction which will then turn against us anyway, which means the elections themselves, eh, you see what program medvedchuk is running, i saw the article about his disappearance, i was just hidden by 7.8% of the people who are who to whom they are not worried about these questions. of course, they won't say anything publicly now, but then they wo n't vote for us in the elections. why? because such laws, in particular, lead to violent identification. sadomitification is the main thing. it's like an inverted pyramid in a child. it stands for identification. you can work there only with incentives. trust

a person who has been a little engaged in psychology for many years, mr. oleksiy. in my opinion , your thesis that it is necessary to create an expert professional group or any other group in order to develop is quite dangerous in my opinion strategy and conduct a discussion in society , in my opinion, it is simply necessary to turn to the constitution of ukraine after the discussion in society, it clearly defines our priorities for integration into the european q7 nato and we must stop this return to the discussion . or maybe let's do something differently, differently today, ukrainians they don't see i think that you have sociology figures about supporting ukraine's course in the eu, nato, no worse than me, but my question is somewhat different , so you actually did, knowingly or unknowingly, a great service to the muscovites who quote you

declaring that the tragedy in the dnipro, which occurred as a result of the rashit attack, was caused by ukrainian air defense systems. i have seen quotes, including piskov's, with reference to your words, and of course that based on this, ukraine could not, in my opinion, convene the security council un on this matter and to speak and again demonstrate the crimes of brainwashing that are today in ukraine , but i have something in a different matter. so when you dismissed the president from the office, although it is not clear how you can be a freelancer and write a statement about the release is probably a new jurisprudence, but i'm just wondering if they at least thanked you in the president's office in the context that the discussion surrounding the events in the dnipro actually diverted attention from all the very difficult and difficult events that are happening

at this time under soledar and bakhmut and in fact well, i don't know if it's good or bad, but for sure. well, all the attention of the society was drawn from the discussion, which could be quite dangerous. the question for me is whether they thanked you for this, or they don't see it, or on the contrary, it was planned that way, and more. there is one thing that i am also interested to hear: knowingly or unknowingly, you deceived the ukrainians in the beginning after the start of the full-scale invasion, when they talked about the fact that the war would end quickly, very quickly. well, in this context, without quotes, but the meaning was clear at the time. first i didn't say anything about now , we need to create the word now we added i didn't say anything about now