old man and bahmut, and in fact, i don’t know if it’s good or bad, but for sure. well, all the attention of society was drawn from the discussion, which could be quite dangerous. i wonder if they thanked you for this, or if they don’t see it, or on the contrary, it was planned that way well, and one more thing that i'm also interested in hearing, consciously or unconsciously, you deceived the ukrainians in the beginning after the start of the full-scale invasion, when they talked about the fact that the war would end quickly, very quickly. well , in this context, without quotes, but the meaning was then unequivocal let's go then uh in order first i didn't say anything about now we need to create expert commissions now we added the word i didn't say anything about now let's immediately change the context right let's because now listen to your broadcast and i think

this will disappear immediately because what did you say about the discussion, what could be a discussion about the strategy if there is a constitution that must be implemented, someone wants to change the constitution, there are medvedchuk and company, well, they are already where they are today, and i am convinced that ukraine there won't be any more. i'm sorry that i interrupted you . courses, yes, ukraine, because i am the first supporter of ukraine's entry into tess. and you are alluding to the fact that i said that this strategic review should prevent our entry or undermine efforts to enter tsn. they interrupted it, hinted at nothing about a second, if we fully

implement the constitution of ukraine. allow me to quote article 10. the state ensures the third- party development of the functioning of the ukrainian language for everyone in all spheres of social life throughout the territory of ukraine. life in ukraine is guaranteed free development from the use of the protection of russian and other legitimate national minorities. in ukraine, everyone started the word russian, this is the constitution of ukraine . процентировал арестовыч or the restaurant, what did you say? well, i said that, my teacher. thank you for your trust. of course, i think highly of myself, but not so much as to consider that russia failed to meet. who forbade him to deny it during the fight, i slandered him, and if i

watched this program carefully, i said that the judge explained the whole thing twice and they are still figuring it out, once he said that i i didn't say that the rocket had fallen, i said that i named the version which, by that time, in general, i completed the program plan, i had to consider the versions that are in the information space, because i always use these programs to explain how the information space works, in particular, propaganda winter influence i say look, there is such a version i was very tired today we napoleon asked the question in a different way there and if i was even a little bit in shape i would have pulled out this program there reminded me of another version and so on but said what he said so happened i eli i grew my tongue, i was so tired that day, it was a very, very difficult day, but even then, on reflexes, i said that you need to understand , understand, and the essence of me is you, that is, i presented it as an iversity, then i went to bed because i was not very tired, they told me that there was some kind of gwal i got up, i wrote, i woke up after 9 hours and it was already the end of the world. well, i

thank you once again for the compliments, but the fact that we did not manage to gather the security council there will already tell something . this is a strong compliment, one of the biggest that i have heard at least once. secondly, what is it to draw attention away from solidarity if the president was personally in bakhmut and recently observed what is happening there, i know and the president is the most informed person. he always says every night that the most difficult situation in bakhmut is the most difficult situation in bakhmut in the directions of the producer of russian efforts in bakhmut solidarity, is this a diversion of attention or when he brigaded bakhmut three times a day, and the whole office is not engaged in distorting information, and the office informs its citizens in a timely manner, and the family may not have the means honor, what, what, evening , the inclusion of the president and the word bahmute solidar are heard in the official speeches of representatives of the

office, well, the last ones there, i don’t know, maybe a month or two. well, several times on that, i don’t know if it’s a distraction, what else are they doing, they criticized me or thanked me, they thanked me because there was no one from the appeal, it was not planned, it was not planned, and so on, there was an arrangement that caused certain consequences and they are much less than you think, or the fact that they worked together, together, such a favorite position and together from the chukovsky channels and together the moscow channels, the divergence of these waves and paying too much attention to them worked together and it was visible and ferma worked together. the opposition is like a bone in the throat, let's leave it after the war. and today we

stand together and we will stand together in order to win and nothing, any objections will not be able to divide you ukrainian society , so please do not engage in these things because it is very dangerous for our country and your empty accusations and your empty accusations are actually very very dangerous even if you want to put them in your political capital today is not the time to earn political dividends today is the time to stand together and defend the country and where to do how sometimes i would like something else, maybe something else. yes, i fully support your word, i would mint it in gold and hang it in your office. let's hang it in our office because it's just that i

always say greetings. and separately, the political force that you understand. i understand that all my specialists in the polytechnology market and our foreign ones are considered the number one force together with medvedchukovsky regarding the separation of ukrainians into clubs that hate denisov and this incident with the dnipro , they are just very revealing, we will not mention the last name, the meeting was attacked again by the ukrainians, who are very proud of the fact that ukraine won, i was the only one, i contributed a lot. believe me, this is not an undeniable fact, and his attacked together with the moscow medvedchukovsky channels, repeating each other's theses , fueling each other's wave, and each other, and this continues to this day, and they will tell you how you felt from the interview, but if it was a circumnavigation along the dnieper, everything would already be ready there , friends, so let's, if we can pass, let's put a full stop let's really pass, i'm the first relationship, i've never once attacked a person, having an overwhelming opportunity, you

understand that i will point a finger at a person and the person will not be in the information space now if i want to and say and provide de facto, but i have never done anything wrong like that and i will never do it because even if someone hates me, he is from ukraine or accuses or thinks that i am bad and so on and so on. i never answer, i never focused my very numerous supporters to condemn this person or this cheese, because we are all in the same boat if we lose to the russians, we will drown on what we love but hate to one another, and so on. or we will die together, or we will win together, and maybe one in one case, but the facts and facts are that everyone in the networks worked and worked against ukrainians with a family name that begins with it during the war and when someone , according to your words, cannot be fancied and cannot be blamed, well we all have to unite to

win, did you work to show you what they wrote to my wife and my parents, and what symbols of what political power are those innovators who write that we don't need to leave ukraine? to help and help so that we are united , because if it were not for our position, it seems to me that until now medvedchuk would have remained a people's deputy and the opposition party, which we are trying to squeeze not only from the parliament, but also from the ukrainian political society in general. in the ukrainian parliament, and i think that we need to join forces as much as possible, no matter how much someone would like it , so that the former members of the local councils and the parliament do not regret that when

you had the opportunity to give appropriate recommendations in the president's office, perhaps your voice was not so persistent to do it as soon as possible. i am convinced that these signatures collected by ukrainians and the project , including the decision of the parliament signed by me, would have been implemented a long time ago if there was really political will for it, but i say once again that we should do everything in the president's office regarding this issue, you see, you are starting to interrupt me, it means you are worried, you are worried, it means you feel that something is wrong, but i will always be happy to help you and do everything possible for our the unity of the question, please answer yes, we are really grateful to you for the fact that she answers everything, the only thing is the diving of two people, because there are other questions in the studio, yes, oleksiy, mr. oleksiy, i have such a question, you are working, you are fighting on the informational and psychological front, this is a big

job. this war is informative in parallel, it’s clear, but you had so much i’m sorry for the word lapis, how many problems from what was said those times who speaks russian, then for this you, as a fighter, you can somehow raise your level a little facts, i have no doubt that you should not use those words because all of your interviews, all of your streams, are carefully listened to by millions of ukrainians, it is important to listen to the enemies and they use your punctures, you are already an experienced warrior, you can take this into account and not let society throw those out again. things that are three to discuss and that do nothing good. and what was taught to the sand, we understand that no one listens to them anymore, but it is their war, it is their 140 million serfs who listen to them and they say it to them for them. it is important that they hear and take the trip and again went to war and again we have to

rehash it, we draw conclusions, you can correct yourself in the end, this is very difficult, uh, a criticism that i completely share, until recently, it will be after the release. how many raids especially in the last months i was a little horrified this is about the topic and his opus which there is easy to defend and so on and so on it is clear that i can explain it because the intention was actually positive but i just realized that i was very, very tired and i just started carry such things that i have never done and if i were a psychological physical format this is a very convenient event i completely separate a lot of time to myself and i will tighten these nuts

in relation to myself even more and more try to take a vacation and rest a little we are releasing oleksiy arrestovych first for the prom they were sending now on vacation we will tell you here what you should actually do. thank you for getting involved and telling us. but of course, to some extent. about this live, we hope that will be the case. and in the future we will have questions, we will ask you them if you want to answer. the opportunity to explain what, in fact, you may not believe, but you provide such an opportunity. i am very grateful to you and to you, the guests of the studio. kostiv oleksia rostovych, an extradition officer of the office of the president of ukraine, was with us on skype. we continue

our conversation even in the studio about forecasts about what we expect. it is clear that now, the inclusion of oleksiy rostovych turned the discussion a little bit... let's say so in another branch. but nevertheless , let's get back to current events, mr. taras butenko, you will have a word and i know that you always analyze quite professionally... international affairs in a historical context, and it seems to me that today, in general, this week became so breakthrough precisely so that we would be heard and understood by almost all partners and even those who previously tried to remain silent, but today there was information that serbia will help restore the energy the infrastructure of ukraine and the president of serbia are taught by a person who has always been in, well, at least that's what they said in the sphere of putin's influence. he does not recognize the annexation of territories. today, iran

says that it does not recognize annexation. the territory of ukraine, ukraine, the russian federation, and what is happening in the russian federation. this is already the final breakdown, because if you listen to even russian propagandists , they are already openly saying in their broadcasts that in the month of december we expect the sky to be closed, everything that ukraine asks for, it gets everything, and this is the moment when it is even a little nice to listen to them. thank you for the question. you know. i think that the world wants the end of this war as soon as possible. first of all, we are talking about the civilized world, which is on the side of ukraine, not what it spends. there are big finances there, we know that according to the budget we need about 38 million billion dollars, we will have this money, we can doubt the weapons, but the question is what the price will cost ukraine - these are human lives, we will never get them back and they are not unlimited, obviously if

we talk with from the point of view of the human losses incurred by ukraine well, we cannot continue to suffer losses for an infinite time, this is if it is a long war for years, then it is a war of attrition and they are competing from the point of view of the exhaustion of a 140 million country, let alone a totalitarian one, and our country, well, it is obvious it will be very difficult, obviously, if we have weapons, we can win, because in this case , quality wins, quantity, you know what i, mr. petrov, cannot completely agree with the fact that there is a change of surovikin, it is general gerasimov, it does not change anything from the reshuffle additions, the amount does not change. i think that it is not quite so, after all, well, despite the fact that the stars from uh president putin uh, as they say appointed as commander of e-e

the armed forces occupy the territory of ukraine, the occupiers, it is the chief of the general staff who says that the stakes in this war are finally putin has shown that he wants revenge in this war, and the stakes are very high during the second world war, well, stalin twice appointed the chief of the general staff and the command of the troops thereby raising the stakes at the beginning of the war and at the very end of the second world war, first it is zhukov when from the usual general staff cinema front and second - it is vasylkivskyi when already after at the end of the war, he threw it at the contour army of 40 ce in september in august of 45. i think that this is gerasim's appointment. well, it must be said that, after all, zaluzhny gives you the characteristics, you know what characteristics he gives to the general of the generation. a struggle is expected, a war is expected very seriously in the coming months and the hidden mobilization that the russian

federation, the fascist federation, is conducting today at home, says that it is ready to throw, throw, throw meat and, er, it is preparing for decisive battles with everyone the starting positions of the overall plan, where they will start, where it will be, where it will be. the counterattack here is obviously possible and you can predict it . of the russian federation, most likely this is just a deceptive attempt to distract our troops from this direction of a potential counter strike towards the ukrainian border, you know what russia is like today we are such a ukrainian dissident valentin moroz , maybe someone remembers 20 years in soviet concentration camps, he once wrote a piece called a report from

the beria reserve, so today uh, you could paraphrase valentin moroz and say that this is russia today - this is such a peculiar report and reserves named prigolozhin or patrosheva there pluralism between the towers of the kremlin there you can choose between progozhyn or between patrosh but in one and the other case it is a meat grinder, that is, today russia has turned into a classical a totalitarian sect of the fascist-fascist direction, with which obviously no one wants to deal anymore, this is a leper, well, he is sick, why should he die? well, preferably, the sooner we talk about the russian president putin , we expect there are deep internal convictions that this has a heart this year, we are even happy that he is not very much, the sooner he leaves this earthly life, the easier it will be at the front, as the late, unfortunately, the minister of internal affairs of the monastery showed, when will the war end, when he was asked yes, well first of all, when president putin dies, that's why i think it's obvious that this

year 2023 will be extremely difficult for ukraine, we will bear the costs, but we have to, these costs brought freedom and victory on tuesday, so the whole world is interested in this who supports us and this weapon that is given is obvious. it is the president in putin who has to show that he has no chance to win. will nuclear weapons be established in this situation? i think no because i think that putin will only if he goes to use weapons will receive a very symmetrical response from western civilization and the western world this gave well gave this answer what will this answer be? putin has all the recommendations . the other day you could read it, but today yesterday he spoke at a ukrainian breakfast in dovdka where he actually spoke about the fact that all that is better spent in

western civilization today is more than tradition, even more so when they understand that this security, this danger, after losing to ukraine, it is possible about ukraine's money, it will affect all other countries, so i believe that the 23rd year will not only be difficult, it will be a turning point, it will be a turning point in favor of ukraine over western democracy, and uh, it has it is difficult to answer this question in the 23rd year, but i believe that we all strive for this totalitarian machine, which is represented today by this regime, to be finished once and for all and for the russian the federation began to disintegrate precisely because of the defeats it receives today on the front of ukraine. i really liked how you first called the russian federation a fascist federation. let's remember this good definition. we are collecting funds for the old days for the ternopil division of the national guard. in the description, there is a link to the

monobank . the donation, in addition to helping the defense forces of ukraine, will also receive this painting from a national guard, an artist who traditionally paints at the end of each year for the project, says the great lviv, such forecasts for the year or if it will come true, we will find out and we have the largest donation of uah 5,000. at the moment, this person is applying for this painting. if you want to get it, you have to overcome this bar. these are the rules. we decided to play it. that's why this painting is conventionally worth uah 5,000, which is actually quite a lot of money. andriy sagan, who drew, is a very talented guy, and it’s cool that he is also protecting us now in our advanced positions. taras oleiko, you already have a word from what you heard on the air. i know that you are quite skeptical and even critical.

to treat mr. rostovych, perhaps they did not want to enter into any discussion with him, and this is also understandable. because his appearance in our studio, and for our audience, which has always been with us for a long time, it raises certain questions. why are we inviting him, because in people have a certain already unequivocal opinion about aristovych that he is rather, well , if not the person we want to see on these broadcasts, but at the same time, when a person who causes so much information around his person you know, i want to say noise, but i don't know if it's noise. well, it's simple, and discussions talk a lot about it. we also use it and we have to provide it. i understand that he is and it's true . i know that he thinks the same way, he uses our platform and our audience for that in order to convey certain messages, therefore, i only ask our audience to analyze everything that mr.

oleksiy arestovich says, because he says one thing on some kazakh youtube channels, he spoke a little differently and hmm when we tell him that why did you say that, well he says what i didn’t say that’s why you know it’s difficult to even discuss somewhere and it’s not even our task, so good speech, you draw your own conclusions, mr. taras, you have a word about this year that has come. well, share your reflexes. i won’t reflect on the arrestee. there is no meaning. i have my opinion about him, i chew on his information. well, he works for himself, he loves himself, he basically gives people on every platform what they want to hear, and that's why this number of views of subscribers is probably not interested in the truth, the political goal he is working on his political project. i think that in the upcoming parliamentary

elections he will probably shoot his own party as the leader and, in principle , he will collect his votes from those people in love, that is, he is doing his job, and about next year, let's talk, let's say we try to predict like this although in war it is a very ungrateful thing to predict, because every two warring parties have their own plans, they have their own vision, they want to implement it, but quite often it does not go according to plan or a little bit with a plan well, yes, we had the beginning of the war, and in the 22nd year, somewhere there, muscovites calculated that in a month everything would be over and there would be a capitulation of ukraine

. until that time, they were constantly on the rise, that is, they wanted more and more capitulation of the fictional neo-nazi government there. and as for nazification, they do not say anything about it, now they are already talking about the protection, again, of russian-speaking citizens, about what they said in the 14th year the protection of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the two pseudo-republics is returning. this is a good message for the world community because the dictator is giving a slack and if this message is good, our partners will now hear it, feel it and be

ready to finish it, then this 23rd year is really for us may become a turning point, unfortunately, because it will not end in the 23rd year. and this war, but at the very least, we can already at the end of the 23rd year and try to come and liberate the crimea, because it is important for us, er, approximate estimates of what can occur from actions the enemy, yes, they are mobilizing in full swing, and i would be afraid to even stop at those 300,000-400,000, because in the process they could very easily have a million mobilized, but to say that this will not be a problem, because they will be poorly armed ppsh by pps, because they don’t have enough kalashnikovs. i would n’t look at it so pessimistically, either, because they

are mocking chmobyk by chmobyk, but try that chmobyk here, you also need to make an effort regarding their equipment , mmm, what a bat. somewhere there are about 10,000 that scrap metal that can start to drive and let it be bad there without dynamic protection, but it will still kill ukrainians and we have to make an effort to burn it, so we can't relax, but we absolutely can't that somewhere, here's a little more, our partners will help us and it will be already close help well, it won't work like that, er, the enemy is now preparing to advance, he will advance in several directions, er, in many directions, he will advance in some two directions, he will have priority issues here, of course

, er, we need to understand and guess where the priority will be well, maybe one, but in any case, it will be in the direction of the next zaporizhzhia. and they have been actively looking for weak areas for a month and are putting their strength . donetsk region they are interested in the direction of ugledar, kurakhove, the exit to pokrovsk, e-e, druzhkivka, e-e, and for the encirclement of the slavic kramatorsk agglomeration, respectively, these battles of connecting our troops under bakhmut under soledar a will probably be supported by a blow from the north on kupyanska again with an exit to sviatohirsk, this is again a question of the encirclement of slavic kramatorsk, but this and this can certainly be the smallest, the smallest task

that the moscow fascists set themselves, a blow to kyiv will be an outcome, a blow to kyiv, they took into account the mistakes what they did, they lacked personnel of 70,000 contingents, it was not enough, three times more is needed, it is a problem for them to recruit uhu, it is not a problem, we are talking about the fact that nothing will happen from belarus because it does not foresee anything me too i think it won't happen, but there will be movements to bore our troops, there will be attacks, there will be shelling, we have to be ready for that. that 's why i agree with mr. peter. i also think that the end of spring, the end of spring, the second half of spring, it will be so tough