they can hopes are their reward our smiles and hugs they know this every life that's why they keep the light inside us you are grateful to the doctors who continue to save people despite the darkness outside the window thank you we don't just turn off the extra light in our apartments we turn it on where it is most needed we we don't just turn off appliances we don't need now we support the operation of the most important equipment we just save energy we share with those who need it the most turn off the lights turn on the victory you must have an emergency prepared

a suitcase for the cold season, if necessary, evacuate as quickly as possible in the suitcase, it is necessary to put documents and their copies, cash, keys and their duplicates, a set of warm clothes, a radio, a flashlight, matches, candles, sausage, wide tape, plastic bags, a container for water, a first-aid kit, taking into account your needs, dishes, preferably a metal stock of long-term storage products and water for a week, the deoccupation of crimea will take place in any case, it will be necessary to resume education in the ukrainian state language, but with the possibility of learning the languages ​​of indigenous peoples and national communities because it is the motherland of at least three tribal peoples in the country of krymchaks and crimean tatars about the strategy of deoccupation of crimea about the ethnic composition of the population, the importance of ukrainian-language schools and the

deprivation of sevastopol's special status , tamila tasheva, the permanent representative of ukraine in the autonomous republic of crimea, told about the ethnic composition of the population, if even from crimea there will be national territorial autonomy - this does not mean that the rights of only crimean tatars will be protected, this is not the case, or that the needs and interests of representatives of other nationalities will be ignored communities, it is not like that today i am visiting tamila tasheva, the permanent representative of the president in the autonomous republic of crimea. i congratulate you, mrs. tamila. good health. well, first of all, my question is whether crimea is served by its de-occupation, because according to the messages that you, including yourself, are sending to society, your representation is now closely works with completely different circles regarding the legislation that will be in effect after the deoccupation, which should facilitate the deoccupation, this is also the punishment of criminals who

are guilty of war crimes, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and strategy for the deoccupation of crimea what, in your personal opinion, will be the most difficult in the period after the deoccupation thank you alers for the question, what is really worth saying, in 2021 we adopted the law on the roots of peoples, we adopted a strategy for the occupation of the crimean peninsula, we adopted a plan of measures for its implementation, yes but it is clear that after the full-scale invasion, the actual background and context - they changed a lot, yes, and even after the invasion had already begun. we communicated with various government bodies, who talked about what the plan of measures to implement the strategy, we will to some extent review a number of measures, they are not relevant and so on. accordingly, when i

was appointed in may, we met with the president of ukraine, who gave us a number of assignments not only within the framework of work on the crimean platform, because we also perform the function of the national office of the ukrainian platform, including issues related to de-occupation and reintegration, primarily yes, because the occupation will happen sooner or later in any case. yes, of course, we and our armed forces of ukraine they are working on making sure that it happened much earlier and in what way. we also don’t know for sure, but if the key thing is that ukraine always broadcasts that ukraine will choose the path itself, how it will de-occupy the crimean peninsula, as for reintegration, this is really a very difficult issue, this is a question of restoring public power, this is a question cadres in the de-occupied territories is a question of responsibility what you mentioned and in this context there is the issue of amnesty illustration of the issue of russian citizens who are experiencing in the occupied territory and of course that

live on the territory of crimea absolutely illegally, and this is from 500 to 800,000 people who live on the territory of the peninsula, these are court decisions of which during this time, about a million decisions were accepted, and 100,000 of them are related to criminal e-e cases . you know, this is a series of decisions that were made there by the so-called seizures on the territory of the crimea. but they were made not only in relation to political affairs there, including someone killed someone on the territory of the peninsula, someone stole something , and accordingly, we have unexpected ukrainian russian legislation and especially in the criminal part of the legislation , the appropriate number of decisions is most likely well, no , most likely, we will definitely review it, especially in the part of this, this is not a coincidence , the legislation or violates certain rights of our citizens, this is the issue of property on the territory of the peninsula and a number of other important

issues yes, i am not talking about the humanitarian component, the media component, and so on, that is why the president of ukraine has set us tasks not only related to the legal component of this process, but also, in general, how should crimea will look like after the deoccupation yes and these will be legal issues, social issues , economic issues, respectively, there are really many tasks and the president of ukraine will pay a lot of attention to this, the issues are complex and now we are actually looking for answers to them , there will be no easy answers, so we also understand this very well, yes indeed, in crimea, we have an ongoing occupation, it’s not what we had in the territory of the kyiv region there, well, a month, yes . what we had in izyum, e. there or in the kharkiv region, what we will have, uh, in the city of kherson for example, yes, or in general in the kherson zaporozhye regions and so on, where there was no ongoing occupation, where there was a military

occupation of the territory with the crimea , the situation is a little different, that's why we will work in one of your interviews, you said about that to the question why and what is the crimea is there a crimean resistance against it? why isn't it, by the way , similar questions can often be found in social networks? you said that if until february 24, the resistance in crimea was clearly of a human rights nature, then after february 24, it became pro-ukrainian. explain this difference. really always answers the question why there is no resistance in crimea, this is not true, except that there is resistance in crimea, as it existed in 2014, from the big protest on february 26 to the women 's women's actions until march 8 in crimea in 2014 and indeed throughout all during the years of the occupation

, everything was more about human rights protection, yes, that is, a person is detained on the territory of the peninsula under her house, for example , activists come to support the family , support this prisoner, yes, or they are still detained at that time, then these people are transferred to court, and this mass of people is large a sufficient number of people, journalists , human rights defenders and so on, all this is always insignificant - keep in mind that this is a pro-ukrainian story . did not support the occupation of the 14th year and so on, but it was clearly not discussed except for chigoza akhtem there, volodya balukh and miomierova there, or mykola

semeni there and so on. well, a number of other persons who were detained were persecuted and so on, but actually, as far as the protest is concerned now, it is really pro-ukrainian, that is, people in crimea for eight years hated russia, they openly hated it, but they did not take any action, why they did not take it, because they did not understand that right now their action and their sacrifice would help ukraine in some way, so now they they see that a just war is a dishonest war. on november 1, 2022, we analyzed court decisions on the territory of crimea and there were 184 administrative cases under article 20.3 of the code of administrative offenses of the russian federation . the article, the so-called profession, actually discredits the armed forces of the russian federation, yes, 184 cases. this is what we learned

from the occupation registers. we are sure that there are a number of people who are under such administrative responsibility . ukrainian ones with stories about what is going on. there is a war in ukraine. yes, regina, there are so many people. someone puts stickers on the car, for example, they put their own on the back window of the car. discredits the armed forces of the russian federation . someone like sasha teropon oleksandr terapon is an activist from alushta. he was not an activist until that moment. from his distant relatives, that is, his wife's husband's sister, with the fact that he serves in the

guard and he is a war criminal , that is, very, very different actions, they exist and it is worth talking about them, because it these people who will definitely meet us, and in crimea some of them have left - that's true, but some of them remain and the potential is enormous, in fact, you just shouldn't expect open opposition when there are large protests on the square in simferopol or in other cities crimea this is a different resistance, a completely different character, it all has a different character and that's why such people need to be supported and told about them. here there is already a question about this border between the need to survive in the occupied territory and open collaboration, i.e. a crime against the state and the community because, as you rightly pointed out, people lived for eight years.

they had to work somewhere, that is, one person goes to the hospital, and another, for example , works in a hospital, and this is how we see that ukrainian society sometimes requires this pain from this horror demands to punish everyone, how to draw this border, in fact, although it is not easy to draw a border, but we already communicate it, we draw it, we are a civilized state that strives for the integration of the great european family of peoples. yes, we respect international law, including international humanitarian law, and there are answers to this in principle in international humanitarian law , because the country is the occupier, occupying the territory. it has to ensure the life in this territory, as well as the persons who worked in this territory and ensured order,

including even they can be policemen , even they can be firefighters, for example , it is clear that teachers, doctors, and so on, they did their work either to maintain law and order, yes, or for the ordinary life of people, but in reality, this is a separate and uh, there is a category of people, the key is that it is important to say that we will not be unequivocally responsible for the mere fact of your residence in the occupied territory, unfortunately, now the ukrainian law, which was amended after the start of the full-scale invasion, gave too broad a framework for the concept of collaboration yes , accordingly even a person who, for example , sweated taxes in the occupation budgets. yes, she can be

criminally responsible, including accordingly. now we are working on balancing this, because clearly a person who is just me is very conditional i say she sold grapes, and in order to sell grapes on the market, she registered herself there as a fop or whatever it is called according to russian legislation and carried out her activities accordingly. she is not responsible for this, but for example, a person who did the fop itself or some other company created and serves the military potential of the russian federation, for example, they built a military unit on the territory of crimea . should be held responsible, that's why the boundaries are very thin and it is necessary to

approach it individually. made management decisions and these persons who committed and you already mentioned about it war crimes crimes against humanity and crimes of genocide violated human rights such persons they will definitely not fall under the amnesty, yes , they will definitely respond in accordance with the criminal legislation, and in fact, we will not be able to drive through this sieve absolutely all of them, we will not be able to do it purely physically, you can imagine what the burden will be on the judicial system, the entire law enforcement system, and so on. that is why we need to define categories who definitely will not fall into the category of persons who will most likely be exempted from

criminal responsibility and lead to lustration. and who definitely should not fall into it at all yes. that is, we plan to create there certain e commissions well, it doesn't matter which ones to call good honesty there is something else yes, when the person there will er talk about the fact that yes i did not commit such crimes that is, she signs herself that i did not do this yes or i am all there or on the contrary she says yes i cooperated with the occupation administration to some extent in this case. i had to because i was pressured there and so on, but big criminals, including those who stole the wealth of crimea, and some who destroyed the cultural heritage, for example, including no one can avoid this responsibility, but more than that, many citizens can definitely sleep peacefully and not be overpowered by our entry into the territory of crimea and our armed forces, our state

bodies and military administrations, and so on, so that they are calm for their lives because they will not be involved now to responsibility it is also very important for us to communicate this and society in crimea is a national issue for crimea it is more than relevant because on the one hand we have heard such a vulgarized version of the occupation crimea, where is it explained that there is a simple majority of russians and others, although you and i know a huge number of ethnic russians, residents of occupied crimea who left, who even now are defending ukrainian land and are doing it to return ukraine to the peninsula from the other side, we heard during this entire period of occupation , many reproaches were made about the political prisoners, you say that you speak only about the crimean tatars, you do not speak about all the others, and are they not there? this question was constantly raised .

in crimea, we again get this russian ghetto, a russian-speaking hetero-russian cultural ghetto, on the one hand, and on the other hand, for example, such discrimination may arise, on the contrary, in fact, this is a matter for the state and the formation of state policy , so it is clear that there was no real kremenskogo education on the territory of crimea in the tatar language, since there was no education in the ukrainian language as the language of the indigenous peoples, the international e suton repeatedly warned russia and called for the restoration of education in the ukrainian tatar language, the recovery from zhelis, but this did not happen, yes, accordingly. of course, it will be necessary to restore education in the ukrainian state

. accordingly, of course, we cannot ignore this. in fact, it is, well, the russians told a lot about the fact that there was a majority of russians there and so on. in fact, this is the territory of ukraine. ukrainian citizens lived there. yes, what now? there are a large number of russian citizens there, about 800,000 people, these are all citizens of russia. they must definitely leave the territory of crimea and these ethnic russians, yes or not ethnic russians, but political russians for their citizenship, and they should not be in the territory of crimea. i absolutely agree with you. it is important. was it a russian or a ukrainian, an ethnic crimean tatar? if, er, they are all citizens of ukraine and we must

work with them as with citizens of ukraine. the country of the krymchaks and crimean tatars according to international law and already ukrainian legislation. i already mentioned that we adopted specific ukrainian legislation regarding indigenous peoples. therefore, this is the legislation that we adopted in 2021, which vladimir putin did not like very much, who compared this legislation to with some kind of nuclear weapons, its division of the territory of ukraine into some varieties , yes, absolutely the same russian propaganda narratives that he voiced, in fact, this does not give the authorities the opportunity to full-fledged development of the indigenous peoples in this territory, so i think that when harmonizing the policy and this is a series of steps, we would assume , of course, that the restoration of educational institutions, both secondary and secondary education, and

extracurricular education, and higher education, and this is an opportunity for cultural exchanges and trips for young people in including yes, which, after all, is actually the center of the future crimea that will go to the mainland of ukraine, there children from the mainland of ukraine will go to crimea yes, and we want to make such programs very active. of course, before the deoccupation of crimea, we want to conduct a certain audit of the humanitarian policy of what is happening in crimea now, and what, accordingly, we will definitely need to correct. these young armies, some cossack detachments, and so on, we will have to get rid of it, including that. we foresee that it will not be easy in the humanitarian sphere.

language, e-e, there should be a balanced culture , politics, humanitarian and cultural spheres , including yes, these will be there. well, i don’t know , the holding of various lectures and so on. that is, it is a complex complex of various events, but i will repeat it once again, it is very important not to forget that this is the motherland for of the three-tribe peoples recently, just on the day of the opening of the crimean platform in zagreb, abstract chubarov, the head of the mitlis of the crimean tatar people, wrote a post where he spoke about, including crimean tatar autonomy, this is a question that has been standing all these eight years after the adoption is the coming into force of the prophet's legislation equal to the people, and this again caused a debate, which is also important to say . last year, we adopted this law on the roots of the people, which already gave certain rights to the indigenous peoples, in particular, to the crimean tatars .

in order to unnerve the activities of the representative bodies of the crimean tatars and to give the possibility of financial support for such bodies, including e tam of the crimean tatar media. not everything is so simple, because especially this is the first year activities of the law, which, well, exactly fell on the period of the war, and it’s not easy, but we are already developing a law on the status of the crimean tatar people, and on the basis of the representation, such an interdepartmental working group was created with the involvement of an expert environment of people’s deputies, this text that we worked out, we want to give international to our partners for familiarization and certain expert exhibitions, in particular to the council of europe and the osce in order to receive their feedback on this law and draft law so far yes and of course it is worth saying that these discussions, what are they yes, they are really unprofessional, it's so uh, in

fact, facebook is such a bubble. yes, where is this question being discussed? actually, this is not the first time we've seen uh, such a discussion. i remember that a few months ago, they were also certain, i would say throwaways, after all, regarding the question if there were such people in the taxonomy, you know, i had the feeling that there were some ears of the fsb standing with them . the discussion is a little different. i am sure that there are people who simply do not understand what this is and it needs to be explained, because in any case, there is a decision of the state must take into account the interests of the key audience yes, for whom this and these decisions were intended, first of all, it is important to say that now such decisions will not

be made in view of the war and martial law , and there are currently no changes to the constitution even now, when we were developing the law on the draft law on the status of the crimean tatar people, we avoided as much as possible interference in other legislation that is sensitive. yes, for example, there is a law on the state language or the constitution because this the law will definitely not be adopted. yes, we have to understand that, so for the transition period, we understand that the public authorities will look like a military administration, then a city civil administrator, then we will see that sevastopol will definitely be deprived of its special status, because when was the special status of sevastopol granted it was based primarily on the russian desire to have the

black sea fleet of the russian federation in sevastopol, and accordingly, this status is especially dependent on this factor if i were to leave, we must unequivocally, in order to ensure security in crimea, we must unequivocally withdraw the russian fleet from crimea after the deoccupation, accordingly, this special status for sevastopol will cease to exist if it were to exist, as for e-e autonomy . here, accordingly , i still believe that despite the fact that we need to restore the rights of the crimean tatars to self-determination and the rights of indigenous peoples who are protected by ukraine and international law, we should still take into account the fact that not all citizens now support it because they don't understand. and, in my deep conviction, an explanatory campaign must be carried out and must be carried out now, it must be clarified that

even if there is national-territorial autonomy from crimea and crimean autonomy, this does not mean that the rights of only crimeans will be protected tatars, this is not so, or the needs and interests of other e-e employees of other nationalities will be ignored, this is not so, because the key is that there should be certain safeguards for the indigenous people of the crimean tatars regarding its existence but i think that in such a joint synergy of communication of the society we will be able to reach a consensus with the state bodies and, in the end, make the necessary decisions for the state, in fact, tamila tasova, the permanent representative of the president in the autonomous republic of crimea, was with us. see you soon, friends. i love my the city old cozy streets new wide

noisy avenues i love the smell of coffee in the morning in a cafe near the house i love my family i respect my neighbors i love children's laughter on the playground in the park i am not tired of watching the monitor carefully because it is mine the city is hard to keep order when you don't sleep for the third day it's hard but worth it unbreakable irrepressible incredible we see your strength and resilience we are proud of your bravery we bow to your courage we rejoice in

your success we are equal to your patience you stand you stand we fortress bakhmut salty as blood iron as will how to get financial assistance for the employment and shelter of internally displaced persons, if you are an employer and have employed an internally displaced person, you are entitled to compensation from the state in the amount of uah 6,500 per month for each an employed person from among the vpu, submit an application to the state employment service center or in electronic form through the action portal, if you sheltered an internally displaced person in your home, you are also entitled to compensation from the state of uah 900 per person per month

, for this you must register your home on the website of shelters, institutions of state communal private ownership also have the right to compensation for the shelter of internally displaced persons, conditions and amount of compensation in government resolution no. 261 of march 11, 2022 of the year, learn more about the provision of monetary compensation by calling the hotline of the ministry for reintegration of the temporarily occupied territories of ukraine .