according to poseidon, if we look at north korea, well, a large, ordinary economy, a large urban shovel well, what can it give there of soviet-style projectiles? well, okay, it could be iran. yes, there are problematic problems, certain ballistic missiles and drones, maybe some other systems, but he it is not enough, first of all, secondly, the pressure on him is increasing now, and surely the americans will eventually understand that this and the iranian nuclear agreement are not going to fly anywhere, that is, it must be buried and even more tail pressed. moreover, not all of them are grounds not only with regard to ukraine, that is, the supply is in conflict with the resolution of the general assembly of the security council . there are good grounds for pushing for new sanctions, the most important thing is to ensure that

iran is less likely to be an infantryman, because in principle the key problem is not the number of sanctions, but their application belarus well, yes, it produces something there, but to say that it is there silicone is removed, well, it is definitely not possible, and the economic miracle was based on russian energy carriers, and in fact they already supported the russian upc, they focused on it, so they cannot do something so new. therefore, they have scrap metal, they have m' yes, these women are offensive , of course they will throw them at us, but they cannot improve the quality of something with weapons or better management of the armed forces, and that is not exactly why we see such success wagner, who is more or less there normal fighters, well, animals, of course, that is, such people, human-like people, or what can you call it. but, actually, such stalinist

methods are the only thing that can make russian weapons effective. they cannot change their mentality. they cannot change their system of commanding troops . they were not able to use what is called a combine, that is, to use infantry armor and artillery together, by the way, what the americans are teaching us now, including over there in germany , they were not able to do this with the most combat units and when they had the best weapons at the beginning of the invasion , now after we destroyed the best paratroopers there, the comrades-in-arms and others definitely had weapons, that is, they allowed something. they will not be able to and will not have time even before spring to do something so combative, so why will they drink, but the quality should be improved so that they can have an advantage over us . especially since we are getting quite interesting weapons and

we need armor, we will have more maneuverability, we will have more firepower, those skills will remain with us communications and intelligence will remain with us and ours and what our western partners provide us. and by the way, i want to say that this is a very cool turn. just yesterday, they commented on the question of whether ukraine can use e-weapons provided by our partners, the liberation of crimea, they are so very they cunningly said that crimea has always been ukraine, and that is why we never said that ukraine should not do this. in fact, there were certain warnings and we did not want, for example, the same heimers to be there. actions of this system, but it is very cool that now they are saying by any means, that is, not only

diplomacy . the light is so that we return ukraine thanks to oleksandr oleksandr hara , an expert on foreign security policy of the center for defense strategies and explained everything to us in terms of defense and armaments. actions and we will remind the vice-prime minister of ukraine for european integration in 2005 sir but already i congratulate you you are listening well i would like to ask you here is what it is possible you know there you have insiders cia director we already talked about it william burns at the end of last week, he secretly came to kyiv, he met with our intelligence, well, with zelensky well, and we remember that it was the director of the cia who also warned, in particular, our authorities about a full-scale invasion of russia, and now he also came so that this shows how you see this

the history of officials, they must be sanctioned in this case by the president of the states that are there all of this is due to the fact that the united states, in particular , through the head of its intelligence, wanted to hear the plans once again. well, let's see how much the president of ukraine is in the mood, what is the mood of ukraine, and whether there is nothing there changed and understand the determination of our armed forces to achieve what the

ukrainians have repeatedly said so that we will consider our mission accomplished not only when we liberate this territory but also when the key initiators of this aggressive war, that is, that zelensky or the 10 points that he announced to the united states, they officially said that they support this idea that there will be such a forum, and we can guess what it was about. to what extent ukraine is resolutely ready to implement this plan, it is obvious that the americans have certain information about the intentions of the russians because there is a lot of writing in american publications about the fact that putin does not show a desire to make any compromises there and there will be another attempt and another contrast and the world believes that ukraine

now er has er such a defining moment when he will leave the action of success in fact the fate of the war er few people confidently say that we will definitely achieve victory in the 23rd year but many western diplomats it sounds like a restrained optimism that ukraine now has just the previous uh, your uh, expert said about this that ukraine is now in a better state, military, moral , psychological, uh, rammstein today in davos, the publication of your anton, what is the topic in davos, came out today ukraine sounded simple, and among politicians and among businesses , it is still very rare. because business, as a rule, business is looking for some practical er, with which business can cover its eyes a little on the fairness of democracy, but in this

in the case, it was possible to just loudly sound this phrase, give ukraine tanks already, that is, it is about the fact that the mood is such that the world now understands that ukraine has to say this war and it is necessary to make maxim er quickly give the most effective weapons, it is important that the weapons become offensive well well, today, ramstein , we will see how it ends, but it is clear to me that the supply of weapons is accelerating and the level of these supplies is increasing. funds for the training of ukrainian pilots to the american budget, are they talking about the fact that the americans already this year are considering the practical possibility of supplying us there with f-15 f16 in one word, and the moment is such that there is something to talk about there with the president

of ukraine and the head of the american intelligence and e-e i think that everything we see now confirms that from the doctrine we will not let ukraine e-e lose this war a-e the west and especially the united states are moving to the task of e-e making the victory of ukraine inevitable p oleksandr well then no less russians they continue to advance and advance, including the zaporizhia direction of soledar, they are piercing the defense, they are continuing to mobilize, they are continuing to arm themselves, that is, there is some kind of movement, an imitation . and what is europe thinking about and what to do next with russia yes even if well even if when ukraine frees crimea and donbas we go to our borders what

to do next with aggressive russia which i think well, it won’t stop if it doesn’t stop, please, no, but it’s obvious that it doesn’t give you any reason to expect that they realized something and repented, and it’s very important to see that public opinion in russia supports this war, and it’s no longer possible to say that they they don't see the number of victims. they don't understand what's happening. it's just russia, ah, we understand this kind of russia. we understand this kind of russia, for example, the signatories of the tallinn declaration. but we don't see germany and france and the service states there politicians who still believe that well, where are you going to go with russia? but politically it is very important that the european parliament, uh, the overwhelming majority there is

somewhere 470 against 19, in my opinion, i don't remember the exact numbers and votes, uh, i voted for the creation of a special a-a tribunal for war criminals of russia is not an indispensable international criminal court, but it suggests that the answer to your question is what europe sees and how it sees the end of this war, the majority of politicians in europe already understand that simply even by military means to defeat russia, but leave it within its borders and give them the opportunity to simply regroup there, bind up the wounds, did not bring putin's responsibility here, if putin manages to get out of the water dry and there with all his uh for implementation, the lessons will not be learned, therefore the world understands that in order for the situation to not be repeated, it is necessary not only to achieve the military victory of russia, but also to hold

a show trial, after which any of the dictators who will be there to think about the possibility of some kind of aggression against their neighbors or to blackmail with nuclear weapons, it was clear that the punishment would be inevitable, and the world is moving in this direction and in europe this is exactly the approach. it is precisely the resolution itself that needs to be done in order to fill it with legal content and to create this tribunal. of russian assets, because well, as a person who worked there with finance, i understand that the question of prices, that is, among

western politicians, er, and russia - it actively uses the topic that well, we need money, there is not much money there, communal shadows look a crisis, a crisis, an economic recession , and at the same time, we have hundreds of billions of russian assets there that are simply frozen, but which we cannot use, and in this direction, there is now great progress. i think that these are parallel processes. but if we we are solving the issue, for example, of confiscating assets of the central bank, and the united states and europe are also working on this, a number of working groups have been created there, there is a legal issue, but it becomes clear that if the frozen assets of the russians are not used, then who has uh, what about compensating for those losses, and who should finance ukraine now? so far, we receive honest funds. the european union has never

given any country such uh, such loans for macro-financial stability support. in general, there were no precedents in the world for money that we will get it now, but everyone will understand that it cannot be endless and that is what russia is counting on. the question was what does russia think, does it think that sooner or later the west will get tired of the elections in the united states and economic problems in europe, russia is using all its there is the possibility of influence by disinformation, hidden agents, open agents of their influence, in order to simply force ukraine to go to negotiations and agree, because it is just a refrain for them to agree to territorial concessions, that is, russia wants to present its own fact to the public

the expansion of victory's empire, and it hopes to achieve this by entering a war of attrition, that's why mobilization , all that is happening now , can only be countered by effective modern weapons, in particular, those that will allow ukraine to conduct offensive operations, and you and i witnesses to the fact that the event has already progressed to the fact that we are just getting armored vehicles and we have already talked about the possibility of modern tanks, that is, everything that will allow ukraine to conduct an effective counteroffensive operation. and the question well, we talked about it after that. after the military defeat, russia 's leadership should be on the dock and for now. yes, this is a political decision, but these political decisions are supported

financially and with weapons, as you and i can see. olezh well, you mentioned finances and nationalization, confiscation, this is my favorite question, but it concerns russian assets in ukraine, not in europe. how did it happen that a year after the start of the war, a huge bank owned by russian oligarchs and billionaires is operating under sanctioned in europe and the united states. how did it happen that we have a huge trading platform in the capital, the largest capital, which belongs to the closest circle of friends of putin? how did it happen that we still have six or five oblenergos in ukraine, which also still belong to the same group there ? uh, the thief in law is the second one there in the state, i think there is a third one sitting somewhere in the mind of russian citizens, and no one is the maximum. why did we manage to arrest it there?

everything is fine with us how, how, how can we even demand from our european partners that they nationalize and return the money to us if we do not nationalize ourselves and we do not need money from this business or if it works if it works, it's fine well, let it work same business, he does a service for our ukrainian citizens, in particular, a russian bank, a bank of european jurisdiction, but the owner of which is russian billionaires, i ask you to speak . is the leader of kremlin policy and has and collects funds and transfers to russia, including i am silent about that ideological poisoning is an issue that ukraine often receives from western partners, i heard about it in washington and that's right. and when we start , you know, uh, well, to sneer at our partners, to scold

them for a certain uh, certain uh, or indecision in actions, then i'm sure that these questions are just being asked, and you understand this question from the point of view of our partners, this is a question for you and me, this is a question for ukraine, for ukrainians, for leaders of public opinion, for politicians in the end and he wo n't get anywhere, it's very good that you bring him up, i don't often hear him at such a high level of discussion at the marathon, uh, because i'm there often. i understand that war, we all understand that war, we we all understand a what is happening but e there are many questions we have seen we see now that hmm in the end they began to catch various agents of influence

at a high level there, including the security services and in counterintelligence and every day we hear that this or that official there, at a high level, people have to arrest them but ukraine has grown, it is an oligarchic er, an oligarchic pyramid, er, none of the ukrainian oligarchs happened without a partnership with russia. i will never forget when i came to the national bank there after india, and every time when a russian oligarch came to the national bank there there are five or six of ours, you know how there is a fish , a big shark is swimming, and next to it are small ones that are feeding, this very one, very yes. simply mandatory accompanied every

russian oligarch and it has grown into our system, which we still have to cure and simply cut out of our state organism oleg rybachuk thank you for joining the broadcasts of ugu with a vision eh and now the head of the center for joint actions oleg rybalchuk vice-prem the prime minister of ukraine is from the national bank , but from the entourage of the head of the national bank, are there russian agents sitting there who allow the operation of a bank owned by russian billionaires close to putin ? they started with kobolev, remember the day before he was announced as a suspect in the case of the head of naftogaz kobolev, he is accused of well, how are they accusing him of illegally receiving almost 230 million hryvnias, this is 2018, we remember the bonuses were written out then, according to the results of the victory in the stockholm arbitration, arleot now says that it was illegal oleksiy goncharenko yesterday, he told our broadcast that this was

only one of the episodes. he even said a serious phrase that they were looking for us there, they dug the imbalance of the energy system of ukraine in general, and this is national security now the key question is the lawyer, public figure tetyana kozachenko , ms. tetyana is joining us. congratulations, i congratulate everyone, please bring us the clarity of such a legal case, kobolev. how do you see what is happening? well, it is still impossible to bring in the truth, not only that, but we need to familiarize ourselves with the documents, but this is all the time . reminds not so much of justice and prudence or compliance with the law, some completely different political games, and it is quite possible that nabu has turned into a political body as much as possible. unfortunately, i want to observe the real work of law enforcement bodies and for the fight against corruption, but the

current officials are still not involved in extremely high-profile cases. and i am talking about the top officials of the country, and we understand that corruption is impossible as nurses. if the highest officials themselves are not loyal enough to it and do not support this structure that is, this is how state bodies do not work, that is why they initiate borna’s activity all the time on the basis of particularly active decisions, because how can one assign to the same notice of suspicion in koblevo when it is not a decision that is taken by him that is taken another official, therefore, all other officials should be given appropriate reports of suspicion, why such selectivity is a lot of mysteries today and a lot of distraction. i think that any crime, if there are circumstances in it and illegal actions were committed, has the right and

should to be investigated, however, since it happens all the time as an informational pretext , we discuss a lot and then nothing happens for society, such a format of the case is not transferred directly to the higher anti-corruption court, it says that this is used in particular or can be used for, let's say, for political purposes for some political purpose, that is, in your opinion, this is a political order. in my opinion, i do not exclude this because it is very seriously used as an informational excuse, and moreover, the decision to receive the award was not made by this official, why on today, no notices of suspicion have been presented to all those persons who made such a decision, from this it can be seen that this case does not lie exclusively in the legal sphere, and in this i see extremely serious risks ms. tetyana, he did not make this

decision, but i understand that he, with the approval of the supervisory board of naftogaz, was building a document with a proposal where a similar amount of his premium was written, or am i wrong ? the ice council only approved that amount and wrote. is such a concession worthy for me personally it is not worthy if such an offer was submitted because we will now talk about the offer, but we can see with you the essence and document of this offer . premiums for me, it is not simple, it is excessive, it is unacceptable, but he is not the subject of decision-making, he can make a million proposals, no, he makes such a decision, it is not his authority, therefore, you can offer anything, you do not have the tools in your hands to make a decision, others people will

take it for you, but you are the one who receives the responsibility. the constitution does not work like that. human protection does not work. the person who has decision-making tools is responsible. first, it is quite obvious that such awards cannot be given in the country. it is unacceptable, it is not commensurate with the way citizens live, what decisions are made by officials, but they raised this story about kobolev with illegal bonuses, when we have a lot of russian assets in the country that still need to be dealt with, but now they are dealing with kobolev, and the assets that need to be dealt with are russian directly law enforcement agencies that do not relate to the powers of nabu nabu everything must be shown from time to time draw attention to high-profile cases we have seen a lot of informational reasons, in particular we have also seen informational reasons regarding

vovka tapes of the judges of the odious district administrative court, what we saw in a year of investigation, whether they were able to bring to justice or whether they could bring the case to court, neither the district administrative court nor the wolf were able to suspend by only liquidating the entire court of all cases and all judges suspended from those cases that you looked at it, look at what we watch all the time , we watch huge information devices, it is extremely important that the nabu remains a technical law enforcement bodies that, not with their words, but with their actions and concrete judgments and observance of people's rights and those legal procedures, implemented the functions that society hoped for in the fight against corruption, because in addition to public and public and awards, which must be

fought, but fought in a public way, people must in the same way, journalists must and the cabinet of ministers must respond to your investigation of what society says about the norms of law and unrestrictedness, that is, what the state decides . they are proven not by words, not by informational ghosts, but by specific cases and specific actions so that there is trust in them, well , about limitations, after all, returning to the story with kobol, a person prescribes well, he does not prescribe to himself, he submits a submission to the supervisory board, i am asking to give me a bonus in the amount of 10 million dollars 10 million dollars, it was almost 200 out of 270, almost 270 million hryvnias, and now the law says that only 37.5 million hryvnias were not received, because there is a limit. well, two, how much is there ? 36 seems to be monthly wages a person can receive as a bonus in a year

everything else that he received 230 million is illegal , is there really a limitation in the state structures of state ownership, a limitation on premiums, 36 months of the year in this regard is impossible. check all these instructions and find out the discretion of the authority of the relevant body that approved. the award has been issued for two years, how much do you want to get an answer from me now in one minute , which is not a year, but much more, i thought that i would not investigate, but thought that if the actions are illegal, why do the children interfere with me promptly, well, illegal awarding of the award, i fully accept

why we receive this with you information more than two years after the events took place after the government changed after the relevant official does not have the necessary political immunity to carry out his actions why do they keep those affairs and throw out information ghosts, it is impossible for such large prizes to be awarded, but it is also impossible for you and i to be distracted all the time by these information ghosts and not receive real investigations and prizes if the prize was issued illegally if it is proved hypothetically that kovel personally arranged so that this prize was issued, then please tell me if there is evidence, show their society and bring the matter to a conclusion, until this happens, you and i again become outsiders to theatrical actions, this

is my opinion, as a person who has been for more than 20 years is engaged in the legal field and extremely wants to have not show information, but real concrete cases with proper admissible evidence or from yourself to whom will they agree with me, i would really like to and here i am very interested if we have a private business somewhere in ukraine in which the manager of the company receives an annual bonus of 10 million dollars. i really want to find this person. i really want to say what it is. there is an opportunity to get, for example, dividends, there is an opportunity to make a profit. that's why it's incredible, just incredible. lawyer. thank you. public activist. thank you for your opinion on our broadcast, more news 11:00 anna eva melnyk, you have a word. congratulations, colleagues. thank you for your work. we are waiting for