to lead this parallel project, what does medvedchuk's article mean in reality? well, i have very much not in reality. and in that reality, what is rare about putin here in reality, when the special operation began, and again, this is not my fantasy, i can quote putin , it was said that russia was this special operation will ensure the legitimacy of the ukrainian government and the freedom of all the peoples of ukraine to be identified. kherson, according to this, according to these references, these regions joined russia, well, that is, because of independence, russia recognized kharkiv oblast as independent, uh, how did it declare zaporizhia oblast independent , i don’t know poltava, sumy , kirovohrad, many were independent states

for two hours. well, yes three so they annexed them to themselves, but there would remain some part of ukraine, maybe or maybe not, which would be under the power of the marionev government, and this part of ukraine would have to unite into a union state, or maybe not, maybe there would be no country in principle now putin sees that the ukrainians do not want this, they need to find a compromise, what is a compromise all last year and they missed putin all the time, vladimir lenin scolded him from the desert why did they make such a mistake , they announced some kind of ukraine, but ukraine - no. well, now it turned out that it is ukraine. what is the conclusion what does putin do with this, if ukraine exists, then it must be a puppet state, so what is the compromise, what can i say to biden, joseph, you were right, ukraine exists,

i see they do not want to be part of russia i i don't understand why, but this ukraine is another russia, just as medvedchuk malin writes, and little russia or the second russia - these are all medvedchuk's articles, russia is good, russia is better, but russia, but another country agreed with you and we will not fight with this country. and here is our simple peace plan, first point let this second russia be recognized by the kremlin, we will recognize it in the white house. let's just agree. the state can still exist, of course, what is attached to russia is ours, but we will not fight with this ukraine, we will stop hostilities. we stop shelling well, it is clear that there must be a person at the head of such a ukrainian state who must guarantee us that the country will not join nato or that there will be no nazis there, that it will not threaten with nuclear weapons, that it will not create a chemical laboratory. well, who

can that be? this is who we trust, we trust viktor medvedchuk and you trust him. joseph is a professional, serious person, and by the way, he is supported by the majority of ukrainian citizens, they are just now under the oppression of the nazi regime, they can say, but they really want to live in such a to ukraine well, that's all, putin is probably sitting there in his office and saying, look, mikhailovsky, we offered them a good compromise. are they really not going to agree? такие идёт . so you can say from those that he wrote articles is nothing new, it’s true p they didn’t hear vitaliy, but they heard something new that ukraine is well, that’s important. it’s also progress . by the way, we’re not for medvedchuk . in principle, there is no ukraine to annex some

territories to russia, here together say no, well , there is just another ukraine, it should be good , not bad, because i always seemed to be a question of the 14th year, so you say that there are nazis, nationalists, anyone from bandera, well, there is a legitimate president, yanukovych, and under you under the control of crimea, part of donetsk region and part of luhansk region, why don't you transfer these territories under the control of the illegitimate ukrainian government, there is a legitimate president, there is a legitimate prime minister, prosecutor general, minister of defense, minister of internal affairs the whole leadership of the country is in trouble, why are they in moscow and in donetsk, the correctness of some motorola with zakharchenko maybe because you do not believe that ukraine exists at all well, there was logic in this, if we think that we want a good ukraine and a good one, then the territory of a good ukraine it is possible to create a legitimate government of yanukovych

, why is it necessary to join except for russia , there was never an answer to the same question, that is, putin had it, because there is no ukraine. well, crimea was always ours, they say, besides ours, but donetsk and khersonsky zaporizhzhia region well, there is no doubt that the majority of the population of ukrainians why yanukovych didn't come to kherson why kherson region was annexed to russia well, there is no political logic in this. about real politics, even at the level of aggression, as stalin did. stalin attacked finland, what did he do first? he created plates in the city, by the way, now russia, he did it later, this is how he bought the government, the people's government finland, led by comrade kuusinen i, signed an agreement on military support with this government. what did lenin do with the ukrainians in kharkiv? the bolsheviks announced that they had a people's commissariat of the ukrainian people's

republic and invited the red army . help the working people, but no one said, but you know, we are here in the soviet union. russia liberated kharkiv, annexed it to soviet russia, the same did not happen then. you have two governments, from helsinki, the government of fury, and for years in a row, everyone in kyiv is the government of the central council, and in kharkiv they speak bolsheviks, but here there is none yanukovych's government doesn't exist and doesn't even fly over minsk on a plane, as you know, like carlson. maybe he doesn't trust anyone anymore and that's why he wants to control everything himself, and i think he just didn't believe, maybe he still doesn't believe that ukraine exists at all, he just thinks that a piece of stolen russian land, and now that he sees that it is impossible to convince anyone of this, he begins to try other ideas, you know, it's like a foot to water the temperature, if you

let out a bear cub. and that's all, by the way, about putin's statements. such new, absolutely shameful statements about the blockade of leningrad by the countries of europe, before that he did not say such a thing at all, what is the point here, again, european countries well, okay, finland, well, spain, and others he meant well, some european if and it is already more than one finland, italy, spain, by the way, we need to see if they were on the leningrad front, these countries were definitely there in finland, and i think that it is primarily not to italy or spain, but to finland, because it enters

as a result but we never said that you uh bastards and murderers and that you killed our citizens, but now because we wanted to be friends with you and now when she enters, we don't want to be friends with you anymore and now we will tell everyone who you are who are you that you are just eh culprits -e blockade of leningrad by the way, i have to say that the finnish army was standing near leningrad, that's true, but where was the soviet army before that, two years before that, it was almost under the siege, what was it doing there? why did the soviet troops destroy so many e- e civilian population in finland from the finnish soldiers, because finland actually suffered incredibly large losses for a small country during the winter of winnie, of course, when there was an opportunity to take revenge, when there was an opportunity to return their territories, even if it was a ghost, they were not ready for the union, devils, what with hitler, this is absolutely

logical by the way you know that when finland advanced and returned its territories occupied by the soviet union in 1938, the allies in the anti-hitler coalition, the united states and great britain, supported it despite their relations with the soviet union well, then the military situation was changing, there was a search for some module of coexistence. finland turned out not to be on this side, it is clear, but at that moment in the 41st year, no one had any doubts, let's say that these territories that the soviet union fought in finland vyborkh that these are the occupied territories of finland and this is also necessary as nobody ever has any doubts that latvia, lithuania and estonia are the territories occupied by the soviet union and even after the second world war, although they were officially union republics of the soviet neither the united states

nor other western countries officially recognized the fact of the loss of their sovereignty and continued to consider them occupied territories. by the way, they are renewing it in moscow. do you think that the kremlin was scared? military experts say that the forces they are establishing are absolutely incapable of defending within the city's density and also that there are very few of them in russia, and in order to provide moscow with military forces from other regions they were fooling around, that is, the curtain was completely blown up. i would say that they are trying to show their efforts to their superiors. this is a completely soviet or russian style of behavior.

you see, the drones flew to engels. those armored personnel carriers think that it is them but we do not know, in principle, by what means of air defense the ministry of defense of the russian federation and other tragic objects are actually protected to understand that in russia they underestimated the effectiveness of the drone war at the first stage of the war, then they evaluated and bought iranian drones , and with their help they began to destroy ukrainian critical infrastructure, but in principle, russia started this war as a very unmodern state, now it becomes clear, after engels, let’s say after other military airfields in the russian hinterland that a drone can fly anywhere that a drone like me can be sooner or later will appear in moscow now it is still a matter of emotions if i tell you the listed families and i find out that there were some explosions at the airport in engels or in belgorod or somewhere else, i am

absolutely not interested in this, because russia is organized in such a way that news can only happen in moscow. there is no news in russia. i will forever remember when i worked in moscow that i went to the office of his colleagues on the russian days in one publication after the press conference it appears from the ministry of emergency situations and the dancers said that at some point i remember already when in three years there will be a huge earthquake in russia says there is a huge i say you know there will be a big earthquake, they say, oh god, what a terrible earthquake, where it seems to us in the far east, but how important is it? well, i imagined that i was sitting there, let's say there in lviv, some editorial offices in lviv and they tell me, you know, there will be a natural disaster in poltava. everything can be destroyed there. well, if you think about it, well, we don’t react like that, the truth. and they regulate, and oh, and oh, if god says, you

know, there will be an earthquake in moscow, there will be a problem in the yasinevo microdistrict. oh, well, these are mountains of the whole of russia because if there is already an earthquake in moscow, then where should i live, then you understand that the philosophy of life of the average russian is always connected with the fact that rich blood types live in moscow. provincials who don't even know how to live. i just drove here with mr. prizist, что ты общее под ногами патаешся, all these phrases are known to everyone. who knows what russian civilization is? russian culture, it's all written here in moscow, in moscow, and even here there were also many compatriots with you who wanted to go to moscow, to moscow, to go to moscow, especially to be there, i guess. oh, and show-biz, and everything you

want, and business, and just life, it’s not in the provinces, it’s just moscow, but russia, you want to go to russia, russia is a hideous provincial a state with completely incomprehensible wild people. i also remembered for the rest of my life how i came to some museum in the city of vladimir. by the way, the museum is an ancient city - it is the center of the volodymyr sultarsky principality of the cradle. the cathedrals of this civilization enter to the museum there is this grandmother who guards this exposition and you will see her crying and she says to me oh, you know there was a moscow excursion and they tell me to go from vladimir babushka yes, what kind of place do you have? what kind of province do you have a curb in no a you have grass growing here well, they just made her sick, this unfortunate grandmother says that she lives in principle, an intelligent woman lives in the city of volodymyr, nothing, but they

came, the reason i think that all this noise is on her knee muscovites are people with a on a hole and rio in you you understand some, but they are already arrived on a moscow bus and they can kick everyone, this is the kind of consciousness that i have, by the way, i still know, after all, i have been giving birth there for 20 years, i can still understand it . how is it that a person comes to st. petersburg ? pasha hmm, this nevsky prospekt, you look at it. what is a netvirskaya? and the russian leadership knows exactly that because it is exactly the same with these people. you will achieve the same thing. they rule here in moscow and they need masks to be quiet, you understand. as soon as some drone god forbid pop- not even at the ministry of defense of russia, but at some uh, sausage factory named after mikoyan, it

will hit and just 200 kg of sausages will burn, it will be the end of the world, there is no security in russia, where is our government looking in moscow , a drone struck in moscow, there will be tantrums, people will be me, i remember that i know when the house was blown up, when the house was blown up in volga-donsk, no one was interested in it , the explosion blew up, but when there was an explosion of houses in moscow, all of russia was in awe, you could do anything you wanted with these people, well, that's what putin left, i think that they themselves at some point, some kind of explosion is organized, well, in the angelic ones, too, when the explosion happens, they don’t react particularly well. ugh, airfields. well, what? well , why are you there? i think that this is the first moment. the first thing is that they staged all this. and they showed

the second that they will definitely hit somewhere there. then the mobilization was successful, no one will doubt the expediency of the mobilization, because if moscow is attacked, then it is necessary to defend oneself. yes, that’s all already . first me i think that it is necessary to beat like this. so, wait for the second time. and by the way, i think that we can take lenin as well. how long can he lie there? second, eh, maybe they will at least bury the unfortunate eh mummy of these eh- eh, and secondly , they can organize it themselves if they decide that the degree of special support is not enough, that is, we will see how it looks, but what they ate. they began to pay attention to unmanned aerial vehicles, this is a fact, so we are waiting for

explosions in moscow, but for now, i wanted to talk about the topic of the moscow patriarchate well, we have to deal with this topic somehow the people's deputies of vitaly cannot do anything, but a bill was introduced together with the so -called position, among the initiators there were european solidarity and also the servants of the people , that is, a joint such bill. issues of prohibitions regarding the moscow patriarchate and so on. and why is there a new draft law at all if it has already been submitted? i think that the authorities would like all measures related to this church history were precisely on the initiative of the second time. i believe that the authorities, in the end, still do not have a unified position on this matter , why do they still want this

church not to exist as a moscow church, or to have this church be how is it connected with by the current government, that is, as it owes its existence to the government, that is, conditionally speaking, now you should pray not there , but here. if you want to exist at all, this is a completely wrong approach, because it is obvious that many admirers can say that the ukrainian orthodox church of moscow the patriarchate has a clear understanding that it is necessary to negotiate with the authorities. this church generally exists in a paradigm of coexistence with the authorities. we have already said that it is essentially a synodal church by and large since the time of peter i, who simply removed the patriarch and turned this church into a department in the

royal administration in the tsar's office, but in all these laws i see an attempt to turn this number into a department, only in another office, and i believe that we should go in a completely different way, we should understand a simple thing: ukraine is a canonical territory of the orthodox church of ukraine, not of the russian orthodox church, and the question is not whether the ukrainian orthodox church will break the canonical relations with the russian orthodox church, it cannot break them by itself, because it does not have any authority to do so, it is not located on the canonical territory of the russian orthodox church, if were there then, they should have sent a request for autocephaly to patriarch kirill, as they did. by the way, the priesthood of the latvian orthodox church, which is located on the canonical territory of the rpc, and this is not the canonical territory of the rpc

write kirill, there is nothing to announce that we are now autocephalous, there is nothing. because in what technical territory the canonical territory has a clear border, but they somehow know ms. vitalya, strangely from moscow, they are bordered, but they also consider themselves autocephalous without, but they cannot consider themselves autocephalous because they do not for them to make such a decision about autocephaly can be made only by the church in the canonical territory of which they are located until the moment when petriv vselenskyi announced to the patriarch that this is not the territory of the rpc, it should have been the rpc and they should have turned to the patriarch of moscow with such a request, but they did not do it. and by the way, this church is managed by people who withdrew their signatures under the appeal to the moscow patriarchate, the possibility of autocephaly, then everything was done correctly by metropolitan philaret, he turned to the moscow church, the small moscow church

agree with this, with this agreement, they were supposed to go to constantinople, they did not do all this and they did not, in principle, the ukrainian orthodox church in its current state is not orthodoxy, it exists outside the borders of world orthodoxy, because if it is located in the canonical territory of the orthodox church of ukraine and does not recognize this territory of the canonical orthodox church of ukraine, then it simply turns into a church of the tyrants. well, what does it matter what they call themselves there ? they can call themselves martians, although world orthodoxy has simple laws, there are orthodox churches, and we also have a lot of them that do not recognize this territory of the orthodox church of ukraine as canonical, but recognize economic the territory of the russian orthodox church and no other churches, or others , or others, they do not exist in nature, there is no orthodox church, none

. there cheburashki, the question arises. and with whom are these people in unity? the prayer room is the same church. she must be in prayer unity with someone, with someone, with no one, they will say that we are in prayer unity, here is this church with this church with this church is true through the mediation of the russian orthodox church, but if you say that no, they are not, we are not through the mediation of no, then i asked this question. i repeat this question, with whom are you in prayer unity? they turn to their leadership and say but we broke off relations with the rpc, show the documents and we, our members of the synod left the

rpc, show the document, and you really surprise me people, in principle, all studied in seminaries, i did not, people, in principle, all orthodox christians , like me, no, people, all orthodox priests, i did not , but the question arises: if you are an orthodox priest, if you are an orthodox christian, if you have a cross, if you studied in a seminary, why do you behave like an accountant this is an accounting issue, this is if we come to our accountant and say, you know, we want to report we have here where there is a difference without loans please show me the documents on i need to understand how much i received and how much am i to blame, and this is a business conversation, but an accountant does not pretend to be a priest, he does not sit in the booth when he does not have christ here, he does not invite us to confession, he discusses business

issues with us as a professional. and if you are a priest, you have to answer the one and only question on which canonical territory do i pray here if i pray on the territory of the orthodox church of ukraine because the ecumenical patriarchate recognized that, then what do i do in this church if i pray on the canonical territory of the russian of the orthodox church, because it is not the territory of the orthodox church, it must be, or the territory of yaska cannot or not. how can any documents prove the opposite to me, let the difference be that i don't write on a piece of paper, that's spiritual unity. it's not measured by documents, it's a connection in the prayer in the canonical territory they know this. they know their congregation. maybe i don’t know this. they are manipulating and pretending that we asked this. but they did not answer us. this is how i answer you, dear

priests of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, which documents do you have? what seals did you put or do you agree that you are part of the canonical territory of the orthodox church of ukraine? then please unite as this process unites. this is not my problem, it is a meeting of the hierarchs, the agreement of patriarch onufry must speak, metropolitan onufry must go to constantinople for now look there like other members of the synod of the ukrainian orthodox church . well, then you can talk after that, while it should be a public repentance, and then with the service with the ecumenical patriarchs and with the metropolitan of kyiv. and if you serve on the chronic territory of the russian orthodox church well then, don't play in the fact that it doesn't exist well, you don't have to, it's just a game to a game that is based on the illiteracy of your flock on its lack of education on its lack of understanding of simple things, that's exactly what happens in

ukrainian politics politics people are not educated, people do not understand that you cannot give simple answers to complex questions , etc., and then they fall into the abyss in the literal sense of 100. this is also what happens in church politics, because we always want to pass it off as real, so we want to we were considered an independent church, but that is not the case. you are not a protestant church, you are not an adventist - you are not a baptist. you cannot gather at a cathedral and declare yourself an independent church. the prayer service in the charter of patriarch alexy says absolutely clearly that this joint prayer service takes place at the expense of your connection with the russian orthodox church, this charter is in the e-e statute of the new uoc or are you from it refuse and then your direct path is to the

ecumenical patriarch and to the orthodox church of ukraine or you do not go there and then you become a schism with all world orthodoxy, you simply become an ordinary non- orthodox sect, but then the question arises if you are not an orthodox sect, just people who dressed in ryasci how are you? by the way , they always said about the kyiv patriarchate, what are you doing in the caves of the kyiv-pechers lavra , where are the real orthodox christians buried in the temples of the kyiv-pechers lavra, what are you doing there, i'm very curious, what are you doing in er pochaiv lavra what are you doing in the multitude of monasteries, all this presence of yours in these temples is ensured by joint prayer service and world orthodoxy as soon as you say that you are not there and not here grace from your temples grace as for the essence of religion it disappears there is no grace from with the

same success, you can pray in lutheran numbers in a mosque, a synagogue , you can pray, and i don't mind, you just have to go through certain rituals that you can talk about after the broadcast, but you consider yourself orthodox christians, you don't have any churches nothing. who are you then and this is the question that any faithful of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate should ask themselves in their prayers from this very moment. when this story of his prayer took place. simply no one hears . diocese of the ukrainian orthodox church is the father of our onufry and the uoc, we don't have a non-orthodox church of ukraine, but the uoc, yes. but again, you have the uoc, but what is the uoc, what is the uoc. if it's not the mp, absolutely, but

look, russia still managed to consider the issue. under the pressure of the uoc-mp in ukraine, it is a very funny situation that russia will consider it, and the representatives of the ukrainian orthodox church in different countries do not need to protect us, because we do not need your protection but i think that the representatives of russia in the organization of the united nations will tell you what i'm going to, er, the mbk says, well, this is the canonical territory of the russian orthodox church, this is a church that is connected with the unity of the russian orthodox church, and that's why it is being pressured and the ukrainian orthodox church will say not because of this, but because of a why? well, then tell me why. do you understand this? this is a diagnosis that is generally not only spread in the uoc. it is a very popular diagnosis in our society. we want it to become the way it is. well, to