plus i washed her then because i knew that i was going to leave my daughter, then for a second i wanted to surprise the heroes of ukraine with the award of the gold star order for emma's daughter. dad's star became a favorite toy , the daughter played, pointed to the star, dad said all spring and all summer tank company in a tank and not only held positions, but also fired and pushed the enemy out of mykolaiv oblast and the right bank of kherson oblast, it flies all over you and well, in order not to get lost, everything happens, there are moments when people get lost, but you have to stay with himself, the commander of the song is proud of every man with a capital letter, and here stands a black battle, a mechanic, a driver, first, a mechanic, buildings, a pie, well, it happens to be thick, covered, well, it’s not without

it that the team is very good. very much to the guys, to the enemy team, more shells, more tanks, more people, but our guys managed to maneuver so masterfully on older equipment and knock out the enemy that he left an expensive trophy worth more than two million dollars, a beautiful specimen t-80 dances of the 21st year, a seat on the vortic, night vision devices, thermal imagers, the front monitor of the camera, just a beginner, sit down without straining and smoke some milk, well, just follows the toy, powerful, fast , maneuverable, night time, well, danchika, your sun is compared to zero at the moment of this danchika the chances have been reduced to zero, well , you can see the same things, only the older ones. tanchik is also a russian t-80. that is, we will take the engine from this tanchik, we will convince

you in this one and we will cook it, start your radio stations and go better, so now in they are basking in an abandoned house, they are in the song here is a trophy copy from the russians, it just lay like that on it, the infantry came up, i’m just not the minister of these santas, i was on the move, near a female , they didn’t shoot at the drone, they even hit a couple of pheasants, they didn’t kill him, they shot hares almost in mykolayivska there is no region and these tanks worked well in the mykolaiv region, they liberated it, they liberated kherson and now, together with their masters, they will go further to knock out the occupier from our land, commander palchenko is carefully loading his company equipment that is twice as old as them, every tank is protected as a faithful friend, we know this machine very well, ours has never failed, it

was noted at the beginning of the war that it has not even once broken down after the release of course 4 paladin managed to be found under the already released chernobayvka, i was hit by shrapnel and the motor transmission department that stands behind the words kherson is ukraine, the price is high , the song remembers and promises it with its trademark

smile. ukraine to become putin's viceroys in kyiv and raise the russian flag over our parliament , we are talking about mps of the opz party, whose plans were thwarted by our armed forces. but there is one thing , representatives of this pro-russian force still attend meetings of the verkhovna rada and are not completely deprived of their parliamentary mandates. why after a year of war we still have this question. on the agenda is whether it is possible to clean the ukrainian parliament of pro-russian forces and what to do with those oppositionists who are a little forced and not quite voluntarily now demonstrating patriotism. we will talk about this on the broadcast of the night watch in the studio, maria vasilievna and i are working for you in the venglivska, we have a guest from fedirvenislav people's deputy , the president's representative in the verkhovna rada thank you, what to visit i wish you good night , right away the question is at the root uh-uh why on the 11th

month of the war, we in society are still discussing the presence of pro-russian deputies who entered under the banner of what force. as it turned out, what was putin's insertion? and why are we still discussing this? why are they still present in the council? and what should we do about it? you know, when such a question is asked, and such a question is asked not only by journalists, it is asked by their citizens, and there they apply on facebook and in other social networks, and some of our colleagues, people's deputies, there initiate various, in my opinion, shows in this direction in order to gain certain political points, you should always refer to me as a lawyer and i urge you to always refer to the original source that regulates certain issues that we are now raising when we talk about what grounds exist for terminating the powers of odious people deputies who openly and systematically

appeared on tv channels before the war and talked about the fact that russia is our second, that there are no evil intentions in russia, and so on. that is, of course, these are first of all the deputies of the former psg, but nevertheless we must understand that they were elected by the people and given a mandate by the people . this is a majority district, this is a political party, the list received but in both the first and second cases, they received a certain amount of support from a certain number of citizens of ukraine who gave them the mandate of a people's deputy of ukraine, and the grounds for early termination of the powers of the people 's deputies are clearly spelled out by the constitution of ukraine in article 81 and the law of ukraine on the status of a people's deputy , no matter what questions there are, no matter what kind of personal distaste for some representatives of the national assembly, we must proceed from the fact that ukraine has declared its intention to become part of the european legal family, we always ask, when there are some

sensitive issues, for the venetian commission to give us its opinion on certain issues , we always consult with our partners in the european parliament in other e-e structures of the european union and we always have to demonstrate that we also share the values ​​of the rule of law if the constitution of ukraine does not provide an exhaustive list and there is no such list that if this or that political force has a pro-russian orientation or had a pro-russian orientation, there is no need to talk about it now because all these deputies who remained in the parliament from the former psg , they vote for all decisions that are needed for the state almost without exception, so there are no questions here, but i agree with you that it can be of such a situational nature motivations, but despite that, we must proceed from the fact that ukraine has declared itself a state governed by the rule of law. it must follow the norms of the law and not succumb to any emotions. and there are reasons for the early termination of powers, they must be

used. amendments to the criminal code of ukraine provided for fairly strict criminal liability for collaborationism, there is criminal liability for treason and other valuable series of articles that allow in the case of issues to bring certain persons to justice, it does not depend on the verkhovna rada, now there is a decision of the prosecutor general of any deputy can be brought to justice if we have facts of some criminal actions of these or other people's deputies or any other citizens, the body of pre-trial investigation have to conduct an investigation and bring to criminal responsibility in the form of gaining legal force a guilty verdict of the court is one of the reasons for the termination of the powers now the president has demonstrated there is another reason. indeed, i, as a people's deputy, will tell you that i have not seen many colleagues from that wing of the parliament since february 24 in the parliament hall, but the president was in full compliance

with the requirements of the law on citizenship and recognized the decrees on the termination of the citizenship of ukraine by three people's deputies through his constitutional powers. loss, they lost their ukrainian citizenship in the presence of those grounds that were established and er. this gave the opportunity to actually vote in the verkhovna rada immediately and these deputies lost lost their deputy teams let's remind you. it was medvedchuk, rinat kuzmin and taras kozak, and another fourth person, so the fourth one was due to his health. therefore, if it is not entirely correct, the question was about three people's deputies who lost their citizenship of ukraine. rinat kuzmin - this is the one that murko played and was e- is the general prosecutor of kiyanukovich. well, we all know taras kozak, his business partner on tv channels, as medvedchuks, and those who remained created a group because the opzh party, which is deciphered as an opposition platform for so now we have according to the outlaw there, it is illegitimate, and

accordingly they are this group, this faction in the parliament. by the way, there were 44 deputies in the second largest number at the time of the election. 90's and hat abibas, now it is called without a word the opposition, just a platform for life and peace, and there remained those deputies who, for one reason or another, did not flee abroad or were not deprived of citizenship, and putin's main slogan is saying yes, so why not here fragments, he is interested in the current status of this group in the parliament, because we know that a faction is a group, it is quite possible. but does the constitution provide for the existence of a group of those deputies who entered the party lists, because they are not majoritarians

or not only inter-majoritarians there are also majoritarians and those who were elected on the party lists of the former opposition platform during their lifetime and here a rather paradoxical situation arose because the national security and defense council, as we remember, banned pro-russian in other made a decision to suspend the activities of pro-russian political forces further within the framework defined by the current legislation of the constitution , a decision was made to ban these political forces, but here, as a result, a very interesting legal case arose, on the one hand, and the political force whose banners these deputies became deputies or these citizens became deputies, it ceased to exist, but this does not entail the termination of the powers of a people's deputy under the constitution and by law, that is, a situation arose when former the members of the opzj became non-party, non- factional people's deputies. the law

on the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. er, it changed its name and thus they now continue to remain people's deputies. and what kind of communication in the walls of the parliament with these deputies or representatives of your faction other deputies, how is the communication going, especially with those who recently returned from abroad and appeared in the parliament where they had not been there since the beginning of the war? to the parliament and we are very, very interested in what is happening inside. well, i will tell you by and large the communication with that part of the ukrainian parliament that is represented by the former psg has practically been reduced to zero with small exceptions.

approach each time very carefully and evaluate a specific person and his actions , not only his words in many cases, but i will tell you a specific example, on february 24, after the session of the parliament, which would have started there at 8 o'clock. ten or three people 's deputies of ukraine from all political parties of the party, all the rest of the party dispersed somewhere, who went where, this question is also very interesting and ambiguous, but nevertheless, on the 27th of february, that is, three days after the start of the war, i personally called one of enough we have rich deputies of the former ups, there are guys without body armor. we need body armor. he just asks not to be named , so until he gives permission, i will not name his last name. he found two million dollars that we paid for a chinese company. it was

february 27. i remind you of this. the enemy was standing near kyiv and uh, it wasn't something that wasn't obvious, then i'll tell you that even many colleagues, let's put it this way unofficially, told us that everything that we uh, well, that's a question, such a story when kyiv was closed for two days for a curfew well, it is it was the first, well, the third, fourth war, so here i would know, and we bought bulletproof vests, and these bulletproof vests were already at the front in march, and well, 2,000 bulletproof vests probably saved 2,000 lives there for about that time, so i wouldn’t encourage talking about any such specific ones, you know more precisely about e -th generalization i would talk about specific people and what they have done, what actions although of course, to the vast majority of e-e representatives of the upsj in and in society and among our colleagues, this is an interesting position, let's just say, and a year ago they

all stood in the parliament in the parliament around rabinovitch was chanted, stand up, the party was huge , the medvedchuk channels were closed, the action was such a medina, when the president and the national security and defense council all began to oppose, as for continuing your question . representatives of psg had a good record and they tried to demonstrate the weakness of certain decisions and so on. after the war, since the beginning of the war, the speeches were so formal to vote, we see that the state needs our help, that is, it does not somehow remove such people with their speeches before the war , we are creating this picture and the illusion that in ukraine there is an ambiguous attitude towards the authorities, that the people of ukraine are divided, that someone in ukraine

is demanding a vaccine, a russian -made satellite and only them i remember the medvedchuk tv channels talking about the fact that almost every uh, every sunday, at six o'clock in kiev, these fascists from bandera and uh and it's scary yes, but that's it all in all, she convinced putin to start this war and created confidence in him that he would take kiev in three days and that everything would fall apart. as i agree with fedor volodymyr, this faction is not so monolithic from the point of view of any ideology, especially since none ideology there was no actual ideology except for such an anti-ukrainian ideology. but it was more of such a significant ostentatious story because in fact in this faction it is not about that, it is about money mainly. as we know, it was because there was kyiv, which was repainted with

a radical ukrainian patriot to a radical pro-russian patriot there was vadim stoler who, by the way, recently there was a scandal again when he tried to get into the dubai cauldron, but he was not allowed. and this has already happened twice. i will remind you that he was also a people's deputy last convocation. petro poroshenko's bloc well, for example, there were actually quite a lot of such strange characters, and on the other hand, there are indeed people who sympathize more with their hearts, but their mouths say something pro-russian, and with their hearts they are more pro-ukrainian, actually. i can guess who fyodor volodymyrovych was talking about, but i won't say it because it's not my secret, as they say. and i want to clarify. by the way, we were talking about who was deprived of 13 deputy mandates. we completely forgot about andriy derkach, and andriy derkach was the fourth one. it was connected, it was not connected with the state of health, it was connected

rather with anti-zombies, they introduced eardrums, and, of course , with issues of citizenship. several people's deputies of the ukrainian people's party of ukraine may be deprived of their warrants early due to the presence of russian passports, it is about natalya korolevska, her husband yuriy malt, oleg voloshin and oleksandr ponomarev, do you know anything about this and what, well, besides the russian passports, apparently the entire faction of the ukrainian communist party simply had well, by default, such an option was there. and why exactly these people heard this information from you today for the second time, the first time? i was also called by your colleagues from other publications and were interested. well, i'm guessing that most likely these are also issues related to the termination of citizenship , because i don't remember if korolevska was at all honest after the start of the war, and together with

her husband, they did not return here anymore . this is just an example of a purely legal the analysis of the reasons for the early termination of the mandate of a people's deputy is not fully regulated in the constitution in the law on the status of a people's deputy . gives such a reason for depriving the road in one point, the fourth provides for the acquisition of foreign citizenship as well as departure to a permanent place of residence outside ukraine in this case when we are talking about the fact that these people's deputies have not been in ukraine since february 24 or have left the territory of ukraine. this means that they have been for almost a year 3 54 days while the war has been going on, they have not been in ukraine, that is, they are definitely from the point of view of all the norms of e-e

legislation that regulates issues such as taxation that determines where the tax agent has and where it is necessary to pay taxes on other issues related to what is considered a permanent departure from the country. they definitely live abroad permanently and this is a reason for the termination of the authority, but there is no detailed procedure, so when they lose their citizenship, there are no questions at all. and how to establish and e - how the verkhovna rada of ukraine should make a decision to adopt a decision on early termination in the case of leaving for permanent residence abroad while there have been no such cases, but i think that this is also one of the possible options that we we have to consider, and on this basis we can ask the question about the termination of the powers of the nardyps, and before i ask the next question, i want to tell our viewers and radio listeners who listen to us on the radio that we have as a guest fedir menislavskyi, the representative of the president of ukraine in the verkhovna rada, the people's deputy of ukraine from the faction, the servant of the people, because and

many people who only hear about us do not understand who is our guest in the studio, so we will also remind you that national security and defense intelligence are the head of the committee the security state of ukraine to ask about the quantitative composition of today's parliament, in the context of the fact that we had an incomplete composition . - and there is also their new group of deputies. to participate in the parliament, is there any limit beyond which the parliament loses its illegitimacy and the possibility of making decisions about the number of deputies who remained in the session, well, that’s it. it is explicitly stated in the constitution and in the law that this reduction in the quantitative composition of the verkhovna rada of ukraine is less than by one

-third, i.e. when there will be 299 or fewer people's deputies in the people's parliament , then the parliament will actually lose its power from the point of view of the decisions of the constitutional court of ukraine well, the authority to make a decision will not be legislated, well, here the question is also very ambiguous because this is a decision of the constitutional court of ukraine. means of terminating the powers of the parliament for the appointment of extraordinary parliamentary elections, but despite this, this is what the constitution of the legislation of ukraine currently provides as a basis for the early termination of the powers of the people from this composition of the verkhovna rada. and how many deputies today take part in the meeting er, more well, let's say that somewhere near on different days on different plenum sessions somewhere e 300 350

people's deputies are almost always lakes, that is, if you even deprive opportunities to attend the meeting, vote for those who remained video psg, we will not go beyond this limit, which well, it is possible here for the parliament, of course, this program will be authoritative, i want to go back a little more to those days that you have already mentioned, the days at the end of february, last year already it's hard to believe, but already last year, some deputies say that the representatives of the faction, while the factions were behind, walked the corridors of the parliament and warned, in particular, their colleagues from the faction, the servant of the people, that the guys should run away , they say, in a few days, our government will be in power there will already be russian flags here and you'd better hide somewhere, and we'll be in power here , how about you, how far do you know, are these deputies still in the hall under the dome, or

did they manage to do so? these are the deputies who managed to escape abroad and they are still sitting there, you know. i think for sure no one approached and i remember the wonderful morning of february 24, and the deputies , although there were very few deputies from the regional police, but they were also present in the hall when we passed the law on the introduction of the approval of the head of the president of the holding military state and about the announcement of general mobilization. i think that no one has approached or approached my colleagues, but i will honestly say from you that this is the first time i have heard, although the idea itself is that these deputies and a certain part of the parliament are putin and his clique. let's say so i had certain hopes that they could ensure this succession of power in the event of the capture of kyiv and the establishment of a puppet regime , there were probably exactly such plans because i

appreciate the fact that right before the war there were administrative lawsuits against the illegality of removing yanukovych and the title of president and terminating his powers as president, and this is also very strange , actually at the beginning of the 21st, the beginning of the 22nd year ago, there were probably some such ideas, although i think that everyone perfectly understands who so much about the ukrainian position, he is among those who clearly did not succumb to any such threats or predictions in quotation marks. i think they did not fit , but unfortunately i can say that not only from the opz there were deputies who, let's say, very uh, um, they evaluated what was happening, for example, oleksiy kovalev from the servant of the people faction, who tragically ended his life in the kherson region, including yes and

he, uh, i think that both the pre-trial investigation and the history will then put the full stop but really this is a situation that, unfortunately for our political force, is shameful when a representative of the parliament, a representative of a pro-government political force, committed such actions and actually became a recruit on the side of the crows. well, but now there are several bills in the parliament that propose to one degree or another deprive possibilities to participate in the deputies who would come through the police department and she is now in touch with taras butenko, a people's deputy of the parliamentary group of the party for the future. which one did you initiate and what is it uh what is it what problem does it have to solve and what are the realities of its adoption then first of all i want to say that the draft laws may

be different but first of all they must to comply with the constitution of ukraine and the law of ukraine, and if there is such a thing as the deprivation of deputies or powers, we are first of all certain to be guided by the constitution of ukraine, that is why i and my colleagues, people 's deputies from different factions, this is ihor friz. by the way, the representative is a servant of the people. of different factions of the groups, we initiated the project , which has already gained some development . illegal and illegal was stopped by the decision of the nsdc. and where there were court decisions regarding the pj, then the deputies who elected it from this party on the lists, they must or were part of a faction, they must lose their powers, well, their mandates, the point is that we remove them from attendance at parliamentary meetings of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, as we are in other cases of unethical unethical behavior of

the verkhovna rada and deputies of the verkhovna rada by decision of the session of the verkhovna rada, as well as removal from not only the work of the parliament but also parliamentary pre-voting but also in the work of committees, commissions, and so on, that is, about this draft law, it absolutely does not violate the constitution, and moreover, i want to repeat that colleagues from other factions and even representatives, even a representative of the supreme verkhovna rada in the constitutional court he said that this draft law is in a certain way a compromise among various draft laws that have been proposed by a member of the verkhovna rada, that in the end there should be no end to the issue of the presence of representatives of the banned psg faction in the system of the hall ukrainian parliament and what is this, what will it give us, because here we are talking to fedir volodymyrovych, he says that those who stayed in and united there in the deputy group of representatives of the ukrainian people's party, they support the necessary laws, they behave politely, they do not speak on the podium as they spoke

before the beginning of the war and what is the practical benefit of implementing this project if, well, let's be honest, when the new elections are held, i don't think that there will be a person in ukraine who will enter the parliament under the slogans under which these people passed. why is it now in such a context, but there is a legal plane, let’s say, a political plane, if we speak from a legal plane, i will not repeat myself, these people were elected from a party that is banned, er, which faction is now dissolved, therefore, according to logic , they should get rid of mandates, but get rid of them in accordance with the current constitution, or their powers must in a certain way be brought to the current constitution , so how can we do it in accordance with the regulations, there is a political plane in ukraine the war has been a secret for almost a year now, and these mps , a large part of which are banned parties, visited the kremlin against moscow, professed the idea of ​​russian peace, therefore, for ethical and

political reasons, such mps cannot be in the ukrainian parliament, and even when they vote it is obvious that they will vote because no one wants to find a political yes, and otherwise it is obvious that what awaits them is, if not the ukrainian court, the public court, and the public court can be much tougher than ukrainian court therefore, it is obvious that in that situation we need to put things in order.