[000:00:00;00] the kremlin, dmitry piskov, putin's press secretary, he said the idea that these tanks could help ukraine is absurd and that they will simply burn, and some of these military bloggers agreed with him , pointing to the numbers of tanks that have been sent so far by western countries, saying that they are much less than ukraine asked for and ukraine will need a lot of time to learn how to use them. they said yes, it will give ukraine additional fire support, but they do not allow to gain a strategic advantage over russia, which is necessary for ukraine to regain its territory, and there is more and more news on this on the bbc krapka.ua website

, we will see each other tomorrow , education is for the free, choose what you want on megogo, congratulations, this is freedom, my name is vlad , and azure from today's russian attacks on ukraine 11 people died, 11 more were injured, they reported to the state emergency service in order to protect themselves, ukraine needs long-range missiles and fighter jets, how realistic is it to get these weapons now when the west gave the green light to the tanks and from whom it depends volodymyr zelenskyy signed a scandalous bill that strengthens the criminal liability of the military to sign the law valery zaluzhny insisted at the same time some military called

the law shameful and human rights defenders point out that the law significantly limits the rights of the ukrainian military which of them is right and do similar laws exist in the nato armies let's talk and mykola tyshchenko, whom andrii bohdan once called the most influential deputy in the president's entourage, by the way, because of his trip to thailand, the servant of the people was expelled from the party now the question arises. and how did tyshchenko cross the border in conditions when there is a limited exit for men in and on a business trip, as it became known already literally in the evening, he was not sent after the western countries agreed to transfer heavy tanks to ukraine almost immediately , and in ukrainian circles and in the circles of the allies there was talk about aviation and long-range missiles in ukraine, longer-range missiles are needed before russia transfers reinforcements to its forces in ukraine, this was stated by a representative of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense

vadim skibytskyi in an interview with cnn, according to him, russia has already started transferring military cargo throughout the territory of russia and through the crimean peninsula, now russian military depots are located 80-120 km from the front line, and in order to strike at them, ukraine needs longer-range artillery, he said on the eve of skibicka, the office of the president of ukraine hinted that it is time to prepare in moscow, st. petersburg, as the advisor to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podoliak, said, the internal escalation of the war in russia is inevitable, ukraine will not strike at podolia said to the russian federation, however, the logic of military operations is such that the war will come to russian cities anyway. meanwhile, politikus, citing its sources , reports that discussions have begun in nato circles regarding the supply of jet fighters to ukraine now that the decision to send american abrams and german leopards has been made to strengthen ukrainian aviation this is

the next logical step, the politician writes, according to the publication, the driving force in the negotiations about the fighter jets are the baltic states , lithuania, latvia, estonia. well, that's not really surprising the debate will be even more fierce than the disputes over the supply of tanks, the negotiators predict, according to the unnamed diplomat in washington quoted by journalists, the allies have already crossed several red lines that potentially threatened to intensify the conflict . politics, the representative of the european union, however , said that the allies can discuss this issue . in two or three weeks, i will casually remind you that the next meeting will be in the format of rammstein scheduled for february 14, in exactly two or three weeks , oleksandr musienko

, head of the center for military legal research, will join the airwaves. should record ask well, you see the logic of events as we see the provision of weapons assistance to ukraine, it indicates that, in principle, aviation should appear because if we are talking about conducting counteroffensive actions and about a comprehensive approach for what is needed, tanks alone are not enough, and even tanks and armored vehicles are not enough, because there must be two more elements, this is long-range artillery , missiles similar to otakms are already well known, i think to many ukrainians, according to the characteristics of the fact that they fly at a distance of up to 300 km and support from the air. this is a comprehensive approach that makes it possible to introduce successful counteroffensive offensive or counteroffensive actions. there is nothing new in this

. this is the airland btl doctrine that was developed in in the united states even during the cold war, which assumed that in order to defeat the rival of the alleged enemy, then of course it was the soviet union, and competing with this enemy with the number of tanks and artillery makes no sense, because the soviet union had such weapons. there were many and not yet could provide such a large amount of artillery with the europeans, that is why it was decided that airplanes should perform the function of artillery and in some places long-range and long-range active artillery, then a-10 attack aircraft appeared later, others that were supposed to impress targets on the ground to destroy the tanks and artillery of the enemy on the ground and the accumulation of forces, etc. and we see that the approach of 2022, which was applied especially in the spring at the beginning

of the summer, which was called active defense, we heard it very often battle, and even then experts talked about the fact that the next stage should be the transition from active defense to more decisive counteroffensive actions, then hymers appeared, and then for the first time the discussion regarding the provision of aircraft is not new. it started back in july-august of last year, it was about western-style planes, and even earlier in the spring, we remember that there was an active discussion about the transfer of mythical planes from slovakia to poland, which then did not succeed , but let me clarify after all. i understand that they could not transfer the tanks or not, absolutely correctly. that is, this is the course of events , it is like this and logical, it should be accordingly , the chronology, that is, armored vehicles go first , one element, you think. we have already passed

the issue of quantity, that is, we no longer have a taboo for the supply of armored vehicles of any type, this stryker and bradley are the main combat vehicle of the united states infantry, now it is abrams and leopards and two challengers, and maybe there will be lerks, the french are also now at the stage of discussing this issue, that is, we have passed it, now the question quantity and increasing this quantity is the next stage. of course, this is aviation plus missile defense systems. these are the two issues. long-range missiles or aviation is not just an offensive weapon, as they call it, and so on, we can primarily use it as a defensive weapon, because in this way we will not allow russian enemy troops to concentrate

their forces on the occupied territories, we will disrupt their logistics, we will not allow mine to carry out the actual concentration of certain of its forces, the manpower of the equipment, as well as the storage of ammunition and projectiles, this will destroy everything and it will disrupt the enemy's plans to launch offensive actions, accordingly , it will speed up and potentially make our counter-offensive actions are more successful, so if we are talking about this chain and the logic of events, of course, for a full and successful introduction of offensive actions , in principle, as well as a defender, aviation and long-range missiles are needed together, so in theory there should be aviation and long-range missiles at the same time, you know i think that ideally, of course, yes, but if we decided, for example , on february 14, let's say, we would have some clarity more specifically on aviation, then i think it

would be good. and then it was already possible to move on to long-range missiles or vice versa depends on the question of priority, how ready our partners are to react and what is faster to provide and put a risk to admit that with long-range missiles, the supply can be faster and training of our units is usually less than training on airplanes when so when in the office of the president podolyak hints about that that such cities as moscow and st. petersburg and there is a katherburg should prepare, is this such a figure of speech or is it somehow related to the fact that ukraine is waiting for the necessary weapons, missiles and aviation in order to strike those targets which are located in moscow, saint-petersburg and yekaterinburg and other russian cities, you know today , as far as we know, the task before us is the de-occupation of ukrainian territory, the destruction of enemy troops and the defeat of russian troops, and the liberation, first of all , of the ukrainian territory of those people who are very much

looking forward to this, this is a priority task that stands if, within the framework of achieving this task, it is necessary to destroy some military facilities on the territory of russia, and under the neck, i emphasize the military, that is, they are legal from the point of view of international law and international humanitarian law, of course, everything is at the discretion of the military, if the main thing is that we have the ability to do it and the opportunity to do it, because you understand what it is . what is the advantage of russia in that that it has a large territorial geographical area and it can hide its planes in the far east behind the arctic circle in the murmansk e-e area and even by damaging it above for a while the angels air base, which of course is very good and cannot but please, does not guarantee that russia go away, stop striking there, and so on. therefore, this issue is complex, but here is another

point, we must not forget that our partners tell us that we cannot use weapons against russia. i spoke literally yesterday, and i mean against russia on russian territory. i'm sorry, i didn't specify literally president biden spoke yesterday. he said that abrams tanks are not planned to be used, for example, on russian territory, the same with any other weapon, but i understand that mr. podalyak said that it is not ukraine that will fight there, but that processes will begin in russia itself that will lead to a civil war and there will be a confrontation, which in principle may well happen . no matter if there are any actions with russian territory, we will be connected because we have to understand that the risks of launching a-a missile strikes from the air well, they will

remain, and in order to make this impossible in the future, it is necessary to build up capabilities that would gave the opportunity to strike deep into the enemy's territory, but how to do it is a difficult question, because the mask attacks are not the answer, the range is 300 km, well, that's close range and that's all. and again, it's not even 300 km. it seems like 700 or so 800 and still somehow managed to fly, that's why we don't know to the end what weapons can still be right, you understand. i support and i also mentioned engels, but i 'm also talking about the fact that in russia i'm sorry to hell with all kinds of military objects that could potentially be target and it is desirable to destroy and for this you need to have a resource to have damage. god forbid that we develop, god forbid that we produce our equipment , our drones and maybe missiles, and that would be

very good. and this, by the way, would be an element precisely for us to deter the enemy, this is what we are talking about in due time the generals of zaluzha zabrodsky wrote in the fall or even in the summer in an article for ukrinform about increasing the capabilities of e-e rockets, but now, while the epps lasted, everything was actually tied to germany because the tanks are german . if the story now goes to e-e missiles bigger range and to aviation, to whom will this question be tied, or is it correct? i understand that only in the united states because, er, the f16 seems to be an american fighter. well, you can correct me, and the long-range missiles are also american, which ukraine is asking for, and everything will be with us it turned out, you know, we can say that everything depended on germany in the matter of tanks . well, you see how it turned out, after all, it was also from the united states, because until the information that the united states was ready to hand over

the abrams to dota and the german chancellordumov came out. perhaps you know that i will say such a thing paradoxically. but perhaps even in this sense it is better that olaf schol delayed for a few days after ramstein, in fact there for 2-3 days , because we received not just a leopard and consent to the supply of a leopard, but they volunteered to provide it to us abrams, so we got another quite important and pleasant bonus, and in the matter of aviation, if we are talking about the f16, then the first violin is all about the united states, the attack sites of the kailas missile system , this is also important and such as the center. i think that the topic of long-range missiles will be with us for a long time

. and it is important to emphasize what is next. as you said, the united states should play the first violin. missiles, according to preliminary data , today's russian strikes on ukraine killed 11 people and another 11 were injured . this was reported by the spokesman of the state emergency service oleksandr khorunzhy, according to him, in 11 regions in ukraine, hits were recorded during russian attacks, two fires broke out at the site of the hits, 35 buildings were damaged , this applies to strikes by both drones and missiles . well, in total, during the night and day, russia launched 55 different missiles, 47 of which were shot down , the commander-in-chief of the armed forces has already announced this valery zaluzhny of ukraine, russia's target, he said , the psychological pressure on ukrainians and the destruction of critical infrastructure remains unchanged. and so on . russian forces have been intensively shelling donetsk region for three days in a row

coal worker of the donetsk region and surrounding population points, deputy mayor maksym verbovskyi said in a public comment that at the moment it is unknown how many victims among the civilian population, because due to constant shelling it is simply impossible to reach all the residents , according to him, there are about five hundred people, including six children, the police and local authorities are calling on civilians to evacuate in order to escape under shelling . it is actually very difficult to do. look at how

one of the evacuations of civilians in

coal workers, there is a generator and a well, too, the headwaters. well, the water is there, even if it is shown, it was only pumped out. but it is not even possible. they are also themselves. we will attack them first, not for other people. the road and 2 km to the line with a pattern of evacuees, we froze here for greater danger, in this case they are in a bomb shelter, in most of what is happening in ugledar , oleksandr polosokhin, deputy head of the department, has already joined our broadcast communications of the national police of the donetsk region good evening good evening please tell me what is the situation in ugledar, because after the last wounded fighters from there, what is the situation

in the city? well, as you already said , the police cannot get there for the last few days. organizations with the help of the administration and the youth, e.e. going there depended not only on the situation to the front, but also on weather conditions if armed transport could pass a humanitarian woman and an armored policeman were leaving, how did you say that at the moment it is possible to get there, it is impossible to get to the city in general, to drive in, or it is simply impossible to get to some parts of the city, or the city in general due to what is happening right now, in view of this, do you have do you have an idea of ​​the humanitarian situation there? i mean food

, water, medicine. as the video has already shown , they talked about the fact that there has been no water since december . there is no electricity since may. people live on that. volunteers, uh, people heat food with gas cylinders, when i entered the city, we came under fire and saw everything destroyed along the route along which we drove, that is, in fact, i assume that the city is such a gray area . it is not captured by russian forces, but access in addition to the civilian population , er, there are none on the ukrainian side either. well , i understood the last few bits, see also a representative of the city government said a few days

ago that there were approximately 500 civilians left in the city. can you confirm this information, has it changed, at the moment we are considering there are 407 people with six children, all known to us, the police have identified , we talked about the departure of the evacuation and resuming, so we went to pick up a family with three children and our evacuation failed, in total, in a day from 187 people were evacuated from the region, including 20 children, but this is not the only evacuation that was carried out by the police, those services that are involved in evacuation thanks to volunteers, and those who left independently

registered at the immigration points. by evolutionary train i was leaving donetsk region thank you very much thank you very much president volodymyr zelenskyi signed the scandalous bill number 82-71 , which strengthens the criminal liability of the military for failure to comply with combat orders to escape from a military unit or a military unit , he actually signed it yesterday, but against the background of the news about tanks this the news was unfairly, in our opinion , ignored deputies, it was on december 13 last year, a number of public figures, military volunteers, and human rights defenders publicly criticized the draft law, called on volodymyr zelenskyi to exonerate him, human rights defenders focused on the fact that the draft law significantly limits the right of the ukrainian military to judicial protection, and some military personnel even called the law shameful; a petition also appeared with a request

the petition to the president to veto this law even gained almost 35,000 votes , instead the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine valery zaluzhny asked the president to sign the law arguing that it was the need for discipline in the army for a month and a half, the fate of the law was unknown, what the president would do, sign it or send it back for revision and the day before the head of state signed the law well, for example, military journalist yuriy butusov publicly addressed close relatives of people's deputies, heads of the president's office and government officials who are currently fighting on the front lines, if there are any, with a request to respond and tell what they think about this law, obviously hinting at the fact that the document was adopted without consultation with military personnel who are directly on the front line and which will first of all affect them themselves, after all, what are the pros and cons of this law , does it really violate the rights of the military, and does it really violate the military’s right to judicial protection, if so, then why did valery zaluzhny demand the president to sign the document now we will try

to discuss all of this on the air , ex-commander of the battalion aidar yevhen wild yevhena is joining the air my greetings in the evening glory to ukraine glory to the heroes well valery zaluzhny argued saying that in the army it is necessary to bring discipline and called on the president to sign the law no military, for example, here is the first one to remind me. i remembered yaryna chornoguz, a military medic, an intelligence officer of the armed forces of ukraine, she wrote in general and called the bill shameful and punitive, and she is not the only one among the military . shameful. i think my position is known. the law is an absolutely heavenly law. unfortunately, it has become one of those very significant steps that bring us closer to our opponents against whom we are fighting. and we are for by and large, we are fighting for the fact that ours is not such a country, not such a society

, so with this law, of course, we did not immediately become an orkish mordor, but a step in this direction is a very serious step. it’s just that at the same time when the russians, who lack people at the front , are recruiting people, and they are recruiting criminals, they killed these soldiers so that they would fight. and we will do the exact opposite. this normal, ordinary law-abiding citizens who fulfilled their civic duty to protect ukraine but at some point blundered a little instead of letting them continue to fight and, so to speak, correct their one-time mistake, we will take these people from the front and fill prisons with them, that's what will happen now well, listen, let's then take into account the arguments of valery zaluzhnyi, i guess

you can understand him too. he wants discipline in the army, or you can't understand that there must be discipline in the army, that's absolutely of course, but the point is that there is no need here, this law does not add any new crime, everything that is listed in this law is also desertion and e.e. escape from the battlefield e.e. the so-called arbitrary abandonment of a position, by the way, these are two completely different articles that are often confused about the discussion of this law in the media, it's so small, just put it in a column , but so that people can better understand the deserter - this is the one who escaped from the army, escaped from the army, disguised himself as a civilian, somewhere there is a voluntary abandonment of the position - this is completely different. this is when the unit eh really got up from those places where he should have been, whether out of fear or for absolutely objective reasons , it happens very differently, but without an order from the command and went to other trenches, just as ready to continue serving and fighting

, but the unit left in this position without an order, yes, here is also a separate article about failure to comply with an order, there is a separate article that i refer to as the general following the russian ship, but officially it is called as a threat to the commander of the combat situation, so all these articles were before this they have all been criminalized for a long time, the punishment provided for them. but before this absolutely disgraceful law , the court had to understand the exact circumstances under which this or that offense occurred, and it could give as much as possible the strongest punishment, but it could also give a weaker one , or it could give even less than the minimum. and there was also a very good judicial practice when they were finding out that a person was scared, you know, in war it is generally very scary in war , where you constantly have to solve the problem of how to make it so that it is not fear that overcomes you, but you

overcome your fear, it stands there all the time the question of who is controlling whom is it your fear or your fear that is shining, yes, yes, the person did not cope with fear in panivka, ran away from the position, returned, so she was put in front and she was sentenced, for example, to 5 years, but with a one-year reprieve and sent back to fight, fight, show what you made a mistake only once, and then you will atone for it, and then after a year you will be removed from this punishment, this was precisely the most common practice, in particular , according to the article on leaving positions, so, so, so, so , i had to command, that is, actually in the trenches yes, these soldiers, uh, who made a mistake once, they fight better than three new ones after that, because they are ashamed in front of their comrades, they want to remove this shame from themselves, and they are very motivated after that, but now the court is simply deprived of such an opportunity, now there is no court

in general, to find out under what circumstances the offense occurred, he now has the right to find out only one thing, whether or not there was an offense, and if there was an offense, then without any mitigating circumstances, the court is obliged to immediately give a very severe punishment directly related with deprivation of liberty i am here without any options. i want to add that i spoke with the representatives of the defense and intelligence committee of the verkhovna rada like this. for example, serhiy rakhmanin and roman kostenko, who is a military man, they did not vote for this bill and they criticized it, but we also tried to talk to another for this broadcast as a representative of the joint committee of fedir of vinyslavsk, he was unfortunately unable to join the broadcast, but he voted for this law, we definitely wanted to listen to those parliamentarians who supported what is their motivation yevgeny if we are starting from nato standards and the ukrainian army is supposedly moving towards nato there are similar laws let's do it here nato standards are of no use at all