[000:00:00;00] how is spain happening, that is, we are going to spain and there will be vision regardless of whether there will be vision. we will sign the call sign of vladyslav . to help others, not to lose hope, i do it because i think that i now owe something to someone , it's not a debt, it's a little different, we were born with such psychology and morality , that's why i can proudly say that i'm ukrainian family and from there such great strength of spirit and everyone who has given up their hands everyone who is there is losing some kind of hope who lacks soul yes guys

let's try with my example if there are problems with this he will link to social networks write me i will type myself i will talk myself i will help again soul find tatyana lytvynova andriy vyrstyuk specially for espresso i congratulate the entire information week the main topic of russian propaganda was tanks, it seemed that there were not so many tanks as conversations around them in fact this is a decision about the supply of tanks is very important and is even a certain historical stage , it essentially broke the psychological barrier built by russian propaganda for a very long time, it worked to build it, first of all , it is a demonstration that the west rejects the nuclear blackmail of the russian federation, which russia, in principle , relies on it very, very much

puts a lot of hope on this blackmail and here the russians suddenly found out that the threats well, they don't work as well as they thought on the day when germany announced the supply of leopards to the russian federation, they took a ship out into the atlantic ocean to show simulation of the launch of a zircon missile, that is, what happened, they opened a post mine, they said that they conducted some coordinates of targets and such virtual training. and in russian, on tv, all this was accompanied by threats to destroy the united states, first of all, it is natural for washington that on combat duty , a fifth-generation nuclear submarine, belgorod , was replaced by a ship's torpedo days of poseidon and if it is necessary, it will look in the literal sense of the word

. the destruction of american military bases, the american infrastructure, the height of the tsunami from the explosion of the poseidon nuclear charge, according to various estimates, can reach 500 m, and the waves from poseidon are in general confusion. everything is in the western and eastern coast of america, where up to 90% of all american industry is grown and up to 80% of the us population lives, well, that is, they with complete seriousness now they are saying this, well, what is the result of these threats? well, the tanks went to ukraine, that's why, in principle, the nightingale is fighting , that's why the nightingale has been screaming there for several days about what it is. nothing works. new york, i don't care about washington, we don't threaten miami

, we don't do anything to make the americans dangerous , they blew up our gas pipelines . they could take revenge, it will be red lines . it burns seriously, it’s serious, well, they traditionally demolished london, paris, berlin, washington well, of course, kyiv, you’ve already heard it 10 times ago, you can easily imagine these screams, meanwhile , solovyova’s girlfriend, margarita semenyan, suddenly turns out to be in no hurry to go to hell and is not going to die right away, and this is also yesterday, let's destroy us

, you won't be able to, well, many of us, to your regret, many of us will end , what is happening now in ukraine, call this war, or call it your own. it's late, everything ends, the same-year war is over, and the long-lasting tatar game has also ended, and that you are on the same planet in the same europe , next to each other, exactly how we will exist together, i don't know, i don't know what we can do in response , they will test nuclear weapons our country didn't become a country because it's not a pity, it's just that the birds and the flowers were to blame for some kind of trouble, and then we come to what they are arming our enemy with, they have enemies. we can help early with something. what iran needs is the only thing that we could give him. and

the severnaya koree has nothing to help us . well, for the first time, the samayan is no longer shouting that russia can't lose. russia can't be defeated by talking. but you are not going to kill us all well, they are not going to kill us all, first of all, and secondly, what does it mean how will you be, how will you live together, and how they live interestingly with germany after the second world war , so with you, in principle, there is an example which can be adopted and understood as it is there will be and there is no need to invent anything new. all this is old and well-known. well, you see. somehow, even uh , we don’t even really want to use nuclear weapons anymore. well, there are talks about how we will supply the taliban there, we will give something to iran there, and before

what didn't give, well, it's something new, the world has never seen it, yes, can you, now it's not happening. well, it's not a coincidence, suddenly the phrase says what the deputies of the state air force also say, the well-known konstantin zatulin on another broadcast on another tv channels say almost the same thing see for special operations for all kinds of sabotage. in my opinion, we have a complete moral right not to recognize it as a war with a nato country, they do not recognize it as a war with us , and we will not recognize what will happen to them in a war with them, that is, it is necessary in this in this case, all these vosts will be swept away in such a way that there will be no possibility of our immediacy, something will help to launch a missile attack on the airfield by someone in rzeszów and that is too much. but to make it so that something in this rzeszów explodes and it is about time they will start because you tell me otherwise, you are a peaceful and gentle person, but how would you tell me because otherwise they have this appetite

and it will never end, you understand. the fact is that this is also nothing new. who blew it up, well, everyone understands who blew it up, and then bulgaria, which in principle, as it turns out, helps ukraine quite a lot. there were also attempts to kill people, and murders, and even sabotage attempts, and these sabotage attempts actually continue. well, no only they continue this year, they continue, well, in fact, the last decade, that is, again, this is not something new and this is all that they are now basically telling their people there how is it, we will do it well, it is clear why they are telling it, something must be told well, that's why you you know, the change will change the narrative, because it didn't work, it didn't work very well, the narrative there , let's say, it didn't work much, and so on. and

on the other hand, there is another new thing that they also announced that moscow will consider the use of ukrainians, well, ukraine projectiles and with a uranium tip for leopard 2 tanks as the use of dirty nuclear bombs, this is such a fresh statement by the head of the russian delegation in vienna for cooperation in the field of security konstantin gavrilov , it is very interesting there, very ee projectiles because in fact it is not the use of nuclear weapons, but listen now how interesting. this is interpreted by russian propagandists as a request in order to ensure the military defeat of russia . you, although they have worse driving, unmanned systems that are capable of doing it and will do it, and there is no doubt about how much we are tactical nuclear

weapons, because i believe that the use of tactical nuclear weapons is inevitable, they or we who will advance already it will be the heart of a samurai if uranium, after all, is not a radioactive weapon, as explained by yakov kedmy, it can be used as a pretext for using your tactical nuclear weapons, at least by the same bridge, although it is understandable that they burn through 152 mm shells from the arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons, they are definitely in our arsenal, they are definitely in our arsenal, they have a very limited range, and that's why this talk about limited range is the same as talking about dropping a nuclear bomb. for example, destroying part of one's own army

what do you understand this about, but there is even something else interesting, listen to these two propagandists, because they are not journalists, they are talking, because all their lives they are engaged only in creating some provocations. they say that and we will use some such nonsense as an excuse, well, that is, we will not drag ourselves to the globe, we will invent something and we will have such an excuse, well, that is, no one even hides in conversations that russia is just constantly inventing something, inventing, inventing and inventing and will continue it's to make things up this week too. also, there was a lot of stuff made up about alleged weapons at ukrainian nuclear power plants. there were a lot of uh, uh, various uh , uh, provocative statements and outright fakes this week . i hope i'll talk about it again, but now let's move on to the next such thing, so this all didn't work , and what's more, it turned out that the way in which the west acts

in relation to russia is effective, listen to this method of its own, so that ukraine returned the territories, including krym е-э с россией поступать with a frog, only it is boiled, everyone knows that bro, if a frog jumps out of hot water, if it is slow , then it is possible to boil it, we are being boiled . krym is actually the same thing we are cooking if before this they didn’t mention it because we are like how categorically we have done the devil, that is, verin has started to sound like ukrainians.

further, somehow, in this case , the line of others will not remain, and uh, in this case. already the russian federation is a frog, you know, there is already a fixed term, well, actually , about this thing itself, what is interesting is that i consider it the second very serious victory over russian propaganda , because crimea is again on the agenda. well, and the third very significant victory, and such a collapse of russian propaganda specifically concerns germany, what russian propagandists literally promoted was broken there, they had a bunch of their parties there, a bunch of russians living in germany who are also an active force of russian propaganda who go to rallies there all the time they write and they all shared this idea that germany owes something

specifically to the russians, and all this also did not work, and this is also very, very noticeable. see yevgeny shmytna via direct communication, a member of the bundestag. russians perceive it as a german, they understand it in general. what is happening? in scholz and within the party, there was such a schism already, not everyone was of the same opinion, and about the position of the christian democrats, they very harshly abandoned the slow-moving support of tanks. the only opposition in the face of our party is

an alternative for germany the left party, they speak out against supplies , is there no historical memory, is there no such thing as russian tanks, how soviet tanks will one day reach the regs? we see some historical complexes and tanks have been overcome again. go to ukraine. well, this deputy did not even answer this question. well, because he is still a deputy of the budestag, and he cannot politically answer such a fool. but what is interesting is that germany supports the supply of tanks to ukraine. that is, there was a survey conducted by spiegel , which indicates that 54% of respondents support the decision to transfer tanks, 5440% believe that this is simply unequivocally correct, and only 32% believe that the delivery is clearly wrong.

such an advantage is, well, let's say there, it's still a third of citizens who don't really agree, but that's a completely different story. it's a big break, and let's talk about it with our guests . the head of the parliamentary delegation is in the passport, and actually you, his red, were very much engaged in the supply of weapons, so tell me, these are the last things, this is an attempt to put psychological pressure on germany. and what does it look like when you talk to german politicians? it really directly deterred them are all these stories fictions of russian propaganda? good afternoon olga, the only thing that i am not the head of the nato parliamentary assembly is a little bit. indeed, we talked a lot with our colleagues in the parliament in the bundestag and the bundesrat and the two chambers of our german...

of the german parliament, i emphasize why i emphasize that i will be somewhere in the council, because one of the members of the delegation of the parliamentary assembly from germany, just from the upper house, has now become the minister of defense, this is boris podstorius. and actually, i am also personally with him i talked about tanks some two or three months ago, during these months, and this position, which is now shown on russian television, is such a marginal position , because the alternative for germany is a marginal absolute party, which is the most powerful party in the bundestag simply because of some unthinkable things in terms of what to do with ukraine, with regard to supporting ukraine, ah, but even the moderate deputies of other parties have recently changed their position, we have

a lot of supporters in the bundestag many of those who actually put pressure on scholze , including the defense committee, the chairman of the defense committee, and markus faber, a member of this committee who very often travels to ukraine and goes not just to kyiv, but to the front in order to show what is happening to the germans, why do they need leopards, that's all, plus international support , plus the united states, which you actually saw, which also made a decision on the transfer, and because in fact the argumentation from the scholes cabinet changed from the fact that it is an offensive weapon we are an offensive weapon we will never transfer to there it is technically impossible economically unprofitable there defense capability and so on and the last argument was that ok but we will not be

the first that's actually after we heard the church moment we started to form a tank lobby in the united states so that the united states would provide ok first we don't want to be germans with leopards, let's have abrams with the united states, at least any number that will allow to knock out the argument from the scholz inside the country and allow, well , even more, let's say so, to put pressure on the bundestag on the decision of the sun and here it all worked in principle and now we see that there will be abrams and leopards and not only germany , well actually this is an alternative for germany, what is interesting is that there are some deputies with it, they often give me such an impression on you in russian television than in the distance, because they are just non-stop on all tv channels. so there are still very strange people here. well, on the day of the announcement of the provision of ukrainian tanks, you wrote on your page our scheme, about

which we had many negotiations with the americans for months, our tank fronts, which also formed many missions, have already worked . this is what you mean by this whole scheme. i understand that, first i got the leopard. yes, then the leopard, this whole story. and why, why was it so important for the germans that these were exactly the same from the first time? then what is the point of the leopards, why, well, why do they like that, right ? well, that’s all, just like that, you know, we had a lot of negotiations with german deputies, and it was very good that there were delegations for all kinds of things, for example if we talk about e-e preconditionally with delegations in in the nato parliamentary assembly, they are represented by all parties, that is, not only the green ones who absolutely support us, but there were also some without, some were there, and the hds was there, and there was actually an alternative for

germany, and when in this circle you start to communicate and talk about what is necessary in ukraine, what kind of tanks are here, the same question, but not only the vidaoparda. yes, there are marders and pumas. there is a lot of things in germany that we need today, then you begin to understand what the position is, what the argumentation is, and that’s when we are in different rounds during the negotiations, we heard different arguments, including the argument that this is a psychological barrier . if german tanks appear here, then russian tanks may appear on the territory of germany, so that's all a plus . again, i'm saying the understanding of the fact that um, when

it's no longer uh, in scholz's office, when the understanding that this is an inevitable story has already begun as a last argument, they said ok, but let's not be the first, and we actually sat down with the german delegation and the american delegation at the negotiating table in madrid a few months ago and agreed that let 's make a scheme like this and this one, in which some amount that is simply symbolic for a political signal will be transferred on the part of the united states, and then germany will not have any arguments there , and it worked, and you can see that, and now we will receive and withdraw, and the americans are already in a, can we expect tanks from france, because the same is true of their tank, it is a little different from those that the germans have, the americans, and there is also

a debate going on now, what is the point, or are there any such fundamental obstacles, that is why they emphasized on the leopards, the second volume that this is the main battle tank of nato, nato countries , there are many of them in different countries, that is why there are spare parts and bases for repair. that is, it simplifies the more widespread the equipment. the more it is, the easier it is to maintain, repair, look after, etc. for example, the same zoo in our air defense who is there from the cheetahs to the aristi, are we all there, and now they will petrify it somewhere, it makes it somewhat difficult, but we, but again, we do not give up any ppu system and any tank if there are also clerks. and no,

in french, this it will be good in what way and how many of them will you give us, well, this is the question. i think that there are no questions at all, that is, the principled position of germany regarding the provision or non-provision is not a question here, it is more technical, er, how can it be transferred, in what quantity, without there being a loss defense capabilities because well, for example, they gave us a caesar or a third of their caesars , that is, a lot, so that actually, based on what they have in their army , there are more practical questions here than there are political or some psychological ones. i think that and and france will give us tanks when this is. this procedure for the transfer of tanks has begun and uh, the ice cross is a third of the lasers - this

is a serious thing, yes, this simply speaks of serious support with a serious determination to help, this is interesting information, so new. i would said and tell me, you're saying ice cream from a chair - this is the next stage of planes and what else and actually what kind of planes are these and long-range missiles . but the test is what we've basically been asking for a long time, like tanks and the problem with long-range missiles missiles, because the united states is the main operator of those missiles that we need for the heimers, and here it is exclusively from them , er, it depends on their decision whether they will be transferred or not, it is a bit easier with airplanes, but still, er, we are talking about f15 f16, the manufacturer of which is just that

the united states, but the operators of these planes are very, very many countries in europe, and that is, a coalition can also be tentatively formed here, and we are already forming it, but the final decision is the last. in the arms market, you cannot transfer weapons without the agreement of the country of manufacture to anyone, er, there are in principle positive attitudes towards the transfer of aircraft to us in some countries of the european union, that is, they are ready to transfer these same f-15-16 to us, but the final decision must be made by the united states and we are working on it. well, how are we working on these very attacks, which are long-range missiles with a range of up to 300 km per hm in order to control and take

the entire occupied territory in ukraine under fugitive control bought about the efforts of the russians to disrupt the supply of weapons to ukraine , then this is the main emphasis of russian propaganda, there was a media campaign on the topic that these weapons will be resold somewhere , there is no control. rightly predicted that nothing of the russian propaganda would work, because for our partners it is quite transparent about the weapons, what happens to them, they trust us, and the noise will not change anything, but now, what would he call the most tangible campaign of the russians against the supply of weapons, what are they trying to do now to stop this, er, well, the next stage of armament is the main thing, what, what, what, what, what, what, what, they insist on, and what they are trying

to tell our western partners about, i am, er, returning from a business trip in brussels, i have there were meetings in our delegation, there were meetings with the brussels parliament , including with the minister of defense of belgium, and the most frequently asked question was whether you predict the use of nuclear weapons by the russian federation, and when you sort out what they do not will do this for several reasons, for the reasons that this is a crossing of red lines, even for their partners india and china, and in general , a

transition into another dimension. i was before that, but i didn’t succeed with, for example, the blocking of food in the parks of odesa, then with energy blackmail, then with blackmail regarding our hm power station, the power plant in energodar, the nuclear power plant, so on and so forth and so on that they are simply trying to put pressure on our partners. but again, this is a bluff, how is it different, for example, the liberation of crimea from the changes in kherson, which they also considered to be the russian federation and adopted by their so-called referendums of the russian federation, if they did not use nuclear weapons there, it is unlikely that they will use them at all, well, that is, when you tell and show with your fingers that

this is all blackmail of the tables, they calm down and are perceived normally, so i think that this is actually the decision to give us tanks and a large number of armored vehicles, this just says that they have stopped being afraid of russia and do not believe in nuclear warheads. well , it is interesting. i saw that along with such cries to use tactical nuclear weapons to throw something somewhere there is a very active story that was being promoted that let's conduct nuclear tests or the renewal of nuclear tests, it's interesting how it is generally perceived as something so serious , some such application, well, that's all, uh, hmm, elements of the same game on promotion and trying to convince but still you can, there are still weapons and that's why we still have weapons and that's why we