[000:00:00;00] well, now border guards will provide passes only for business trips when they go abroad , and there are a number of exceptions when they can still investigate outside the border. i also add that these norms apply to both men and women if they fall under the defined category according to the government decree, among the exceptions is if they are either a woman or a father who is or a man who is a single father follows children who are abroad children under 18 years old or accompany such a child for the border, this can be such an exceptional case and confirming documents must also be in hand, or if they are going abroad for treatment, however, such confirmation must also be from the ministry

of health confirming their own treatment and the possibility of accepting this person for treatment at the border, who is the institution, where does it follow? well, the only thing that can be added is that the government has also clearly defined that all state bodies subject to this must provide the administration of the state border service with a list of persons with surnames and positions so that we take this into account in our further activities during the passage of citizens across the border. therefore , it is not only a matter of control directly by border guards at the border, but also the responsibility of both state bodies and those individuals who fall under these norms follow abroad exclusively for the purpose of a business trip, well, or if they fall under a number of exceptions when they are also allowed to leave the borders of ukraine, and i grant

, that is, for now, this is exactly on citizens who are deputies of local authorities there or managers of utility companies, everything is their personal responsibility, because the state border service does not yet have this list of these persons . do you understand correctly? if the inspectors clearly understand that a person falls under these restrictions, then of course such a person will not be allowed to cross the border. well, if he does not go to business trip or to other e-e persons who actually fall under the list. we are waiting for the complete lists and will be guided by them when they reach us in full. the service ensures that this information is available to the inspectors of the state border service who are at the checkpoints at all the checkpoints that function in order to be guided by them

during the registration of citizens at the state border of ukraine mr. andriy can you give some summary data about who left the territory of our country at that time , who well, everything and how this dynamic is changing, well , look now, passenger, the flow fluctuates somewhere at the level of 70-80,000 people per day in both directions on separate days. more can to follow citizens leaving ukraine, but the difference with entry is small . on other days, the preference goes to entry into ukraine, so if we talk about the total passenger traffic now , the percentage ratio is 50 to 50 in december. in general, we noted an increase in passenger traffic by about 11%. well, this is primarily related to the new year and christmas holidays after january 7, the passenger flow dropped sharply again, because before that it could reach

100,000 people per day and 120,000 people per day , now these indicators that he noted are 70-80,000 what was your experience back in january passenger flow, i am more than sure, will also have a tendency to decrease. and actually, if we recall the autumn months and september, october, november, it was also a dynamic exclusively to decrease. that is, we do not see that the citizens of ukraine en masse are leaving the borders of the state, fleeing from the war, as well as their return home i would like to note that in august we clearly noticed an increase in the flow of ukrainian citizens back home, and actually this was then connected with the fact that the new

school year was starting and families of mothers with children were returning home to ukraine, mr. andriy, in the end, i really consider the syrian federation to be where this border is. let’s say, where it should be, right now, are they trying to climb out , climb out, climb out with some kind of destabilization , maybe the situation along the border with belarus remains fully controlled . of course, ah this direction remains tense also because training is constantly being conducted on the territory of belarus , joint training between the units of the russian federation of belarus is currently also ongoing and the e-e training of the aviation component, which has to end on february 1, but near the border we do not note the movement of equipment or personnel of units of the russian armed forces. they are mostly located on military training grounds. well, it is a shame, but belarus continues to support russia in the war that it

has waged against ukraine, providing its infrastructure, its airspace, its p - their own training grounds and actually those forces that are involved in the exercises are mostly located at military training grounds where they are located on the territory of russia, belarus, well, on average , there may be about 9,000 somewhere of the russian military, we previously noted a slightly larger number of these on the territory of belarus, but actually, since belarus is used as a base or a territory where training takes place, those units that were previously located there after the completion of training were transferred to russia, possibly in order to establish their e-e to the east, where full-scale combat operations are taking place, and other units are entering the territory of belarus along the border with russia. unfortunately, russia

remains a terrorist country every day is shelling its territory in our border and chernihiv sumy and kharkiv regions, which poses a threat not only to the defense forces, which are strengthening this direction , in fact, shells repeatedly hit the houses of civilians, as well as the infrastructure of our settlements . thank you, andriy demchenko, spokesman for the state border service with the studio to anyone for participation and already waited for stepan berkov lawyer advocacy manager of the de jure foundation good afternoon sir good morning congratulations well let's start with the fact that they

the village commission refused to participate in the selection of judges of the constitutional court of ukraine according to the european law , which in their opinion is problematic delegated experts from the venetian to launch this advisory group of experts so that it deals with the constitutional court accordingly, if only the venetian commission does not delegate, then it will be possible to launch the procedure for the selection of judges of the constitutional court, but we expect that other international partners of ukraine, in particular the european union, will rely on the position of the medical commission and will not delegate their representatives to the advisory group of experts without changes to the law , at least the demand of the european union regarding this reform sounded in such a way that the reform should meet the recommendations of the venice commission if they herself says that the law does not comply with these recommendations, because i very much doubt that any other international partners will submit their

delegates to this group of experts, by the way, and without an international component, this group will not be able to work because there will not be enough votes to make decisions, so i still hope that in the near future the amendments to the law will be introduced to the parliament and will be reviewed by the parliamentarians, and if i am not mistaken, literally the other day the prime minister e- mr. shmalhal stated that such a bill is already being drafted . well, what is it about? what are the biggest positions that worry our western partners? that the foreign experts who are being created, the selection crucible was four , four by three

, i understand correctly. please tell me about the two requirements of the venice commission . the commission does not set any requirements that all four of these representatives from international partners and the origin of the russian commission were foreigners, so it is a bit wrong to say that they will all be international experts very often that if such a composition were to be formed. by the way, the group of experts says that ukraine is against sovereignty because foreigners will select the judges of the constitutional court. this is not the case . for example, we believe that the fourth employee is the fourth employee nominated by international experts. it can be a ukrainian, a representative of civil society, an expert who meets the requirements . of the law. thus , the majority of ukrainians will be in this commission, and the second requirement of the venice commission is that the decision of the advisory group of experts be now i will remind you that the law allows such a situation when, by the way, a group of experts agrees to say that it does not meet

the requirements of the professional level necessary for a judge of the constitutional court, but a person can still be appointed to the position of a judge of the constitutional court, so the venice commission once again clearly stated that any - who is recognized by the group of experts as not meeting the requirements of a judge of the classification court, he cannot be appointed to this position, mr. stepan. the head of the specialized committee of the parliament and he himself pedaled this story with a violation of the constitution on the sovereign right of the ukrainian people to govern their state, saying that if we allow a greater number of privileges , we give preference to foreign experts, we violate the right of the ukrainian people to lead the state , we will violate the norms of the constitution. is this a correct appeal? regarding the impossibility of changing this norm of 3x3. this seems to me to be manipulation or manipulation, because no one

deprives the parliament of the president in russia to appoint judges or not to appoint a judge of the constitutional court, i.e. competitive selection will be carried out. by the way, the group of experts in which i will mention once again may be the majority of ukrainians, citizens of ukraine if at least one of the members of this group delegated by international partners is a ukrainian. but again, this is only a group that proposes candidates for the parliament of the president of the congress of judges no one can force the parliament to appoint someone whom the parliament is the same as the president with judges that is, the sovereign right to appoint judges of the constitutional court belongs to ukrainian institutions elected by ukrainians or formed in another classification way, that is, in my opinion, this is absolutely true, moreover, during the reform of the supreme council of justice, which was developed, among other things

, by mr. international experts also have a voice in the ethics council , and at that time there were also arguments that this could encroach on the sovereignty of ukraine, but in the end only the subjects of appointment determined by the constitution are determined to appoint someone to the constitutional court or the supreme council of justice or not, that is, i do not see such a threat here. and what other organizations besides the venice commission should delegate their experts ? the ministry of foreign affairs actually has a list. and the strengthening of constitutional institutions, and constitutional justice, in particular, the european union, the osce and other similar organizations, there are actually not

many of them. i just want to understand from whom in the near future we should expect comments and, well, the absence of delegates. and is there any reaction to the e-e statement in the venice commission on the part of the ukrainian e-e power of ukrainian politicians , or will they somehow correct the whole story, well actually i already mentioned that allegedly from the fact that i i read in the media that prime minister shmygal stated that the draft law is being prepared, again, we will have to wait to read the text that will be prepared, i have no doubt that there will still be some attempts to find a half-hearted solution, to look for some alleged compromise, in my opinion it's just will complicate the process because the venice commission is very clear in its conclusion, its recommendations, but i hope that

the parliament will not. no , it will be the government or the president who will initiate this bill. fully comply with the recommendations of the nazi commission well , let's assume at least why uh, why are they so opposed to the introduction of this principle in the context of the constitutional court, because we already created it in fact according to the same principle the ethical council, which is currently engaged in restarting, restarting the body of judicial governance, and it works there as well, everything is fine, although this was also achieved with battles, the principle is essentially the same as with the constitutional court. they do not want to meet and do not want to engage in the same practice. i agree with you, they did it in that the constitutional court is a completely different issue because the constitutional court is a body that can recognize any law for the constitutional, it is a body that interprets

the constitution, which actually establishes a new one the framework within which the parliament can adopt a law over this body of political players, this has always been a priority and this is not surprising because every president, every government is worried that the laws that they will dance in the parliament, the parliament praises, they can be canceled in the constitutional court because well, we all know that very often both the parliament and the president make decisions that go against the constitution of the independent constitutional court - this is the institution that restrains any power from violating the constitution is a violation of human rights, and any government always seeks to have control over this institution so that no one can tell you what decisions should be made. this is my call. such a difficult way to implement this reform with the supreme council of justice. there was no similar situation either. there is a great desire to create this mechanism

, which we now see is working, but the price of the issue is completely different there because the authority of the supreme court is only the appointment of the final recommendation for the appointment and dismissal of judges from their positions also very big powers but still not as much weight as the constitutional court, mr. stepano, and in conclusion, let me say two more words about the other court about the district i apologize to the district administrative court of kyiv which well it should be liquidated according to the law adopted by the parliament on april 13, 310 deputies then there was a vote for its liquidation, and this law was written or submitted as an emergency by the president back in april of the year before last year, why are you still working , please? well, from a legal point of view, it is no longer a court that can carry out what

whose judge can administer justice, i.e. he is legally liquidated , eh, there is now a process of liquidation of the legal entity itself, transfer of cases to another court , that is, this process is actually related to the liquidation of the district administrative court , of course, the judges of this court themselves are trying to do that is there any way to delay or stop him, mr. arsiriy, the judge of this court, has already filed a lawsuit to cancel the decision of the state judicial administration on the formation of a liquidation commission, well, it is obvious that they will do everything for so that this court, let's say, the liquidation of this court, is somehow delayed, but this does not affect the fact that the judges of the district administrative court can no longer make decisions in the name of ukraine , then the question arises. the abbreviation will be slightly different, but

the selection procedure today will be the same. in our opinion , the supreme administrative court should be formed , which will independently consider all the most important cases against the authorities at the national level before, we already had such a situation with such a court, unfortunately, the practice was not very satisfactory because it was formed under yanukovych, but we have a good example of a corruption court when the procedure for selecting judges was very public and very transparent with the involvement of an international commission with international experts in which there was public trust and, in principle, now the results shown by the anti-corruption court above, well, they are qualitatively different from everything else, so i hope that having this good experience, we will be able to repeat it with a higher anti-administrative court thank you stepan berkutnyk, the foundation's advocacy manager, was with us before yura, and now yaroslav yurchyshyn

is joining us, a people's deputy of ukraine , we congratulate you, mr. yaroslav, good day. stepan, that was a sad story even under yanukovych. well, what will happen to pavel the wolf, on whom the americans imposed sanctions, the state department of the us ministry of justice in ukraine. i understand the claims against him. there are no criminal proceedings. if you know what they are doing against pavlo vovk, please yaroslav. can you hear us? then i will briefly read that when pavlo vovk, after the american sanctions were imposed on him, declared that he would survive the sanctions imposed by the state department and insisted on the groundlessness of the accusations , he said that the pseudo cases were made up bribes and public accusations without convictions, the persecution of all

my relatives did not happen, except for the burning at the stake, and everything was unsuccessful , pavlo vovk told me in recent years i had to go through a lot, so i will go through it. and the lack of an opportunity to go to america, i stayed in ukraine all the time, i do not plan to go anywhere, because i am sure of absolutely all these accusations, and to all the actors who are engaged in such processing manipulations, this american state is engaged in dirty manipulations, i advise you to read and start thinking about who they will continue to complain everything is just beginning with the mud for the americans pavlo the wolf is the judge of the dissolved the dissolved court is good and you know what i am thinking about in the context of the dissolved of the district administrative court of the city of kyiv about the fact that as an alternative

to it , the kyiv district administrative court is being created, well, that is, after dusk, there is really a big caveat to work. how to make sure that the newly created kyiv district administrative court does not turn into a convenient tool for our politicians to achieve their goals by the way , starting from december 15, 2022 and within 10 working days of the osk the liquidated one had to transfer all the cases that were pending at the time of the liquidation to this class. instead, i do not see any information about this process and whether they had time or at all . this was happening .

the kremlin on the reinstatement of yanukovych as president of ukraine this was reported as if colleagues from the edition of the e-e scheme, so from the program of the scheme, the ex-president filed lawsuits synchronously with the e-e with the withdrawal of troops to the borders by russia, demanding the return of his former president yanukovych, who fled ukraine after the victory of the revolution of dignity, filed lawsuits against the oazk regarding his reinstatement at the same time as the procurement of russian troops. journalists believe that the decision to attack and capture kyiv on a full scale could have prepared a script for the establishment of manual power in ukraine. uaz, due to the return of yanukovych's authority to yaroslav , you have returned to us. good afternoon, what will happen to the dissolved court, please, and to the dissolved

head of the court, pavlo, pavlo, a wolf, or is he not will move to the new kyiv administrative administrative court, yes, and yaroslav, please say, say yes, pavlo vovk is now going to a hearing on the criminal case against him and some other courts that tried to appear in the district administrative court, at first he really didn’t want to , but he was forced to attend these hearings on delivered and, in principle, i think within a year and a half, the exercise is complex with more than 15 suspects , but we will have a solution here, it is very important that the authorities do not let them escape, because we have had cases when it comes to the fact that it is already under under suspicion, for example, by mr. kyril shevchenko, as with the head of the national bank, and suddenly a person leaves regarding the district administrative court, cases are now transferred

to such administrative court, etc., and actually takes care of administrative cases in the kyiv region. and now the higher qualification commission of judges is being formed, which i will be able to start a full-fledged district administrative court of kyiv, although here i would agree with stepan and we need a separate court because it is not logical and in fact there is no such practice in the world when a city court administrative, which should consider cases against the city government, against the mayor, against the city council, about the tetiv city state administration, there are enough of these rights, but it would also consider all cases related to the national level, there are two options, either a specialized court or the transfer of these cases to a higher level to the supreme court, which was elected according to well, also on the tender procedure, and well, or

the creation of a separate court, let's see what path the authorities are ready to take for now . so far, we have been at the stage of liquidation of the transmission the formation of the highest qualification commission of judges is a significant achievement that the oas not only administers justice in the name of ukraine , but a large part of its judges go to court trials like a hare, so yaroslav, let's now move on to the next important topic, e-e, in the ministry of defense, procurement for our military food er, in particular, to conduct a scandal that revealed the reaction of the ministry of defense and the relevant minister, which was revealed and spilled into the information space, now there is information that the relevant committee is preparing a draft law on the publicity of purchases in the ministry of defense er

your opinion, should it be disclosed, in what part should it be disclosed, should public control be returned, and indeed transparency in this aspect. well, not only in this aspect, in fact, if we want to be predictable and have trust as a government from society, from our international partners , then public control and public procurement let it be in fact and not at the stage of announcements and tenders that it is necessary to return not only in the field of defense, why is the field of defense so sensitive ? well, we understand what resources are currently coming from our international partners and it is best to convince them that there are no abuses, this is normal reporting that is controlled by these investigative journalists not there by the method of obtaining any insights, but simply publicly there by going transparently to the public procurement website and without any problems the proposal of our committee and it was actually supported

the vast majority of political forces are er and a half from the servant of the people and from the actual european solidarity from the voice and to publish all purchases that do not relate to weapons, that is, all purchases that do not carry er dangers for the actual defense and the sphere of national security and 10 days after concluding a contract with a clear indicator the price per unit of the product and what will it give, well, in principle, it will not allow you to hard-boil eggs, as making them with gold ones is much more expensive than even in retail networks, we understand that logistics too it is necessary to take into account well, not often , nor the price that is on the market, there are other proposals, but so far this draft law has already been registered . i really hope that my colleagues from the national security and defense committee will promptly

consider it and we will have the opportunity show that we are moving towards more transparency and solve problems not only with resignations and the beginning of criminal proceedings , which is a huge positive, but there are other possibilities in principle for the implementation of any schemes . and in other products with inflated prices well, in fact, first of all, according to the minister of defense, the contracts have been withdrawn because more and more errors have been found, although from eggs for 17 hryvnias, the ministry of defense continues to defend itself , the national anti-corruption bureau has started criminal proceedings on the facts, that is, now it is not about the people involved, but because in fact contracts were concluded with probably inflated prices, and the national agency

for the prevention of corruption, which accompanied it, actually already had signals about what was happening and gave requests for analyzing the situation, but they were ignored by the former the head of the procurement department, bohdan khmelnytskyi, has already sent administrative fines. that is, you issued an administrative fine. at this stage, it is actually a fine that should be confirmed by the court regarding bohdan khmelnytskyi, who has already been released, that is, we hope that the cases will be brought to those who are really guilty in this situation , accordingly, the cases will be transferred to the court under the following conditions. during the war, of course they should be punished, but we, as legislators, should contribute to the ministry creating a system where such abuses of impossibility are possible