Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    February 1, 2023 2:30am-3:01am EET

2:30 am
[000:00:00;00] where it is not about public figures , in fact, the same as the clerks who perform the work, they also give appropriate subscriptions, they are well, the guard of the announcement of the confidentiality of the state secret, they are also constantly objects for the work of counter-intelligence activities . that is, it is not built. so, just on trust there mom, i swear i don’t work for russians, no well, it doesn’t work , understand correctly and clearly that if it were, well, it ’s complex operational games, agent games , yes, that is, well, it’s not the same, well, linear, roughly speaking, so somewhere they cooperated somewhere competed well, everyone had some lines there, but you have to understand that the russians actually always have these lines against skala, that is, they constantly did something in order to see and suddenly it would work well, suddenly there would be no reaction and it got to the point that they left the
2:31 am
occupied donbas and in the luhansk region, they succeeded in murdering british citizens on british territory . well, they succeeded in interfering in the election campaign of the united states of america. about one of his contemporaries, he said, “you have to be like this all your life, ah, you have to look at your face and get a little scared. well, they deliberately tried to widen their eyes, and the red lines, roughly speaking , look. two bortais to kainam yes, it flew in yes, from argentina it turns out normally , you can carry coke by diplomatic mail, well, you understand, that is, in principle, they behaved on the international stage like, well, the state is an outright terrorist yes this is what they don’t allow themselves to behave like this. it turns out that they allowed themselves to behave like this. they
2:32 am
really became arrogant and lost their heads from dizziness from success . to a new old position er advisers the british minister of defense said that gerasimov and i regularly communicate, we have phone conversations as he er then wrote we agreed not to tell anyone what we were talking about but nevertheless, not so many russian military officers of the highest military ranks have regular contacts with their western colleagues , even more so with the minister of defense of great britain . what do you think their regular phone
2:33 am
conversations might be about? well, that is, these are all conversations that are documented and recorded. well, they are held there, perhaps under wraps, well , quite secretly, but everyone understands that this can still become objects of public attention, if not today, then tomorrow, let's remember these stories when the conversation of the presidents was leaked. well, that also raises the question of how this transparency and confidentiality are correlated today. well, what information is confidential today and because it poses a threat to national security, and on the other hand, how important is public interest in such information because maybe in the conditions of democracy, eh. this is a complex theoretical problem, and practically no one has solved it to date. these are the conversations
2:34 am
that are held there on special lines. in particular, the conversation on the eve of the full-scale invasion of russia in the country of putin and johnson the other day he said that putin threatened why did he order about it now and not then before no well look at the same as his macron well the same well because there is also you know a kind of ethics if you want in communication, because everyone in principle thinks about what will be the consequences of such, well, disseminating information. one thing is to take into account the statement that putin made during this conversation. well, they took into account, well, in this regard, zelensky very correctly said yes when they scolded him why didn't he say, we sent him signals, it would be better for you to tell me that weapons were sent than signals, and the issue with weapons is being resolved even today, well, not only problematic, but difficult, but simply to warn, to say that they have gathered there near the border. that's how it is. it was obvious that they gathered near the border, but for what purpose did they gather, just to play with their muscles? well, it was somehow logical to exert pressure, they wrote
2:35 am
ultimatum letters, then in nato, remember all this, that is, it is necessary to understand that it is simple a tool that could be used to achieve different goals. well, using it in different ways. it seems to me that they used this tool in the worst way , that is, when their troops stand near the borders , they were actually more effective instruments of pressure on ukraine and the world community than when they came to ukraine and started stealing toilets , well, after that, in principle, talk about the second army of the world well , somehow without irony well, no one dares anymore and what do you think, if you, uh, putin did not threaten johnson, well, at least this quote led the media hmm about it will hurt in one minute yes, there somehow so uh would johnson be so harsh in his behavior towards russia now what do you think well look in ukraine there is
2:36 am
a big flaw of such uh political culture excessive personification of politics i.e. people tends to consider the political process as a relationship between politicians, in fact, the political process is mutual between social groups , large social groups, if we are talking about democrats, then it cannot be said that uh, the position of britain is determined by johnson's personal likes and dislikes do they influence yes they influence but do they exhaust everything no it doesn't exhaust that's why we see how the power changes in britain and the position of britain does not change the same applies to many other european countries okay for johnson what do you think, will he see here it is personal, i think that he saw, well , he could not help but see, well, again , what kind of people are such concepts at such heights? well, they are clearly very ambitious, well, very powerful
2:37 am
potential, they have a huge, very, huge the level of some kind of self-respect, at least, and it is clear that when someone from st. petersburg talks to you , tony, well, you look at the gdp, the armed forces , the population. do not offend well, who are you talking to like that? well, you have to understand that they may not talk like that to each other, although there are also constant acts between them that show domination and subjugation. i wanted to take a picture, well, this is a symbolic act that indirectly demonstrated his
2:38 am
place , just as there is a video where even the leaders of third world countries avoid shaking hands with putin. of the relationship of subordination and dominance, well, it is clear that it also works in the opposite direction, that this one also did not like it, he would like him to come somewhere and be greeted by everyone as a noble noblewoman, yes from pushkin's fairy tale. well, apparently he is not in such an honor which he wanted, but i will repeat that this is what yama once again wrote only about his other works, identity, where he talks about this, eh, timos, yes, that is, this is about honor , well, that is, about this part of the soul, if we pay, which corresponds to for the need to gain and enjoy the respect of others. of course, they are all timocrats, they are all ambitious and they all very clearly notice er and react sharply to any kind of display of respect or disrespect or
2:39 am
insufficient respect, so i think that in the case of johnson it played its part role and respect for johnson from putin's side, this is a question, but would putin dare to send missiles, considering that russian billionaires have chosen london, they have a lot of real estate there, buy estates there and live there for years , he would go against them, well, the answer is very simple and this determines her position in britain as well well, you understand that in reality, the amount of information that is collected is analyzed by the british special services. well, it is huge , that is, they are great in principle. well, of course , no one knows everything, but then why at all ?
2:40 am
just take it for granted by saying it in his vocabulary. yes, the st. petersburg gateway, what else is it? well, you have seen everything now, if you know it , i will tell you honestly, when viktor fedorovich yanukovych was the president of ukraine, i wanted to write a book called geopolitics for boys, where am i for a teapot? i.e. yes, of course it is for people who started their careers in sweatpants and bombed their lungs to the bazaar, here it is necessary to use a vocabulary that is understandable to them, a conceptual apparatus and to explain to them what is happening at their level i will tell you more that the term e-e of western european political science is not always relevant in order to describe the political reality in the post-soviet countries, that is, when we say democracy there or there is transportability and accountability, then i will tell you that in their textbooks it is interpreted somewhat differently than this is understood in ukraine well, for example, since we have now drawn so much attention to the relationship between russia, britain
2:41 am
, ukraine, i would like to focus attention on one news that appeared the day before and was immediately dispersed by the mass media about the fact that russian oligarch roman abramovich will provide 2 billion pounds ugh, but in reality it doesn't work out that way, it's not that he agreed . take this money. i'll give it. he's selling the club and the british themis obliges him to give those funds to a special fund that will be used for reconstruction ukraine's emphasis, since not all mass media provide this information, and this information, i will tell you that in fact this issue was resolved back in march. well , when the british government, the british themis essentially deprived mr. abramovich of the opportunity to to control your assets, yes. that is, the right of ownership is a matter of owning the right to use and to dispose of it. and when
2:42 am
you were deprived of the opportunity to dispose of it. well , by and large, you use a nominal, then you own it, and they also questioned it. yes, what did they say? he said ok, i'm ready to sell to chelsea if you want, i'm ready to get rid of this resource. that was the impression he had the option not to do it, well, that is, but he yes, he had the sense to take at least this step, well and yes, on the one hand, he was allowed to supposedly unfreeze this transaction, this yes, what the hell, in order to sell the club, he needs to be allowed to carry out transactions, again , in a certain jurisdiction, it is allowed to conduct well , you just know how he uh, how carnegie put what if life gave you a lemon, make a lemon out of it, now, uh, how is this abramovich trying to make a happy face, as if he is drinking very tasty lemonade , although we understand that he is not
2:43 am
the only one. well, for him, it is actually also very you haven't seen the painful events of the media over there behind the ledge. well, you can't even imagine. well, it's just the kingdom of crooked mirrors. well, it can be presented in any way you like , if you asked me. how would i present this information in their place? do you know what's wrong with this joke, rabinovych? did you waver that the party line wavered along with the party line, well, they have propagandists today, they say one thing, tomorrow, new leaders came in and they are already saying diametrically opposite things here. in this context if it is necessary now to slander and press this oberemovich well, then there would be one yard that a traitor, a scoundrel, a scumbag and similar things if they consider it as a possible way for other russian oligarchs to lose something, but because where is something
2:44 am
to save, well, accordingly, rhetoric can be the other well, what's wrong, british themis didn't find sufficient grounds to confiscate the money of the russian oligarchs, so please, the cooperative and the members of the lake cooperative don't have to worry about a safe old age, you'll have enough for a break-even old age is enough for them, because prisoners are usually fed, and a tribunal is waiting for all of them. after abramovich, there may be such a story with the rottenbergs and other russian oligarchs that they will give part of their wealth to the benefit of ukraine and, so to speak , enter into an agreement with the british government for the sake of the preservation of some this year because well, the matter also already seems to have been discussed after the second world war, a lot of german military nazi war criminals
2:45 am
were convicted and served their sentences punishment and became the decoration of western european science and uh, first of all, for oceanic science, well, that is, well, it is fair, unfair, painful, pleasant, not pleasant, this is another question, but what different mechanisms will look for in order to establish justice and punish, well , definitely. it can be, in addition, one must understand that the criminal code, well, even of ukraine. yes, it does not have a single article to execute, yes, that is, there is a conditional punishment somewhere there, roughly speaking, two years , three years, five years, seven years, well, that is, there are many options for punishment depending on the seriousness of the crimes, so, well, today, even if we talk about whether abramovich has been punished, well, for those who think that abramovich should have been quartered or quartered, of course he has not been punished, but for a person who lost several billion dollars, i
2:46 am
think that he is punished someone thinks that this is not a punishment well, just think about how painfully you yourself will melt with 100 hryvnias, not even with two billion or how much he will lose, but in fact they will lose much more and i will repeat that it is still for them punishment is inevitable, but for everyone the punishment will be determined by the degree of severity of the committed crime, even well, i'm sure that it's like him, that the manager of wagner , well, for sure, nothing shines, well, that is, there can't be any, as they say, it will be counted. this is such a deal, definitely. i think that it's a circumstance that pom' whatever, but i can't guarantee it, and besides, you have to understand that it's his relationship with the british themis. that is, it absolutely does not settle his relationship with the ukrainian justice system. it absolutely doesn't settle
2:47 am
the question of his involvement or not in putin's crimes regime, because it is necessary to understand that the russian oligarchs are, on the one hand, a product of putin's regime, and at the same time, putin 's regime is a product of their activities . that is, it is a complex dialectical relationship . well, everyone's guilt will be determined, well, separately, that is, it cannot be said that all of them will be recognized equally, i will not be to blame, they alone can get out of the water dry, no one, well , no one will get out of the water dry, i am a bromochny of water, that is, he has not yet come out of the water. yes, he was simply given the opportunity not to lie down, he was given the opportunity to swallow a little more air and continue. well, think. well, in what direction should he swim, but the wars have come out of the water, and so are the figures of
2:48 am
abramovich, do the oligarchs realize who is to blame in the fact that they are now losing their fortunes, of course, they are aware of it, but again , and whether this is the full stop or whether they will resort to any actions of opportunity, it all depends on what they fear more, well, whether they fear, well, the putin regime more than those than those who can hurt them. well, not only physically, but also financially, well, they are more afraid of those who can hurt them, and depending on this, they will build their strategy. you need to understand that , well, the degree of toxicity is also excellent, that is, in and well, it is very difficult for many to understand, and i understand it. yes, that is, how do you remember the slogan was kill the nazi, the second world war, how it slowly transformed into the slogan of the exterminator, and how it ended. well, we understand that there is
2:49 am
a difference between a nazi and a german, yes, that is and i don't think that we have plans there, uh, i don't even know what constructions are possible, well, the idea can even be put into place , yes, that is, roughly speaking, let's kill, rape, just like you, toilets and perms will be , well, you understand, yes, that is, the same as the red one did the army, although as far as i know, the germans didn’t steal toilets, well, there was nothing to steal, the borodyan union was so prosperous then that in principle, even if you didn’t want to steal a toilet, they simply couldn’t find beer anywhere, they went. yeah, but that doesn’t justify it, because they stole cultural values industrial assets and many other things. well, accordingly, when the soviet army entered those territories, it showed itself in all its glory , yes, there are a lot of memories of russian soviet veterans on this topic. why don’t they say that it’s there ? which was committed by russia, well, the russians, the soviet army, the red
2:50 am
army, in the territories of er, which er captured, well, freed from nazism, respectively, captured already under its own weapon, so i will repeat that in fact i am not a supporter of the concept of good russians, yes that is, they are not interesting to me at all, but you have to understand that there is a difference between my moral and ethical assessment, between the assessment and the legal assessment, that is , i had to have friends, acquaintances among good russians . i don't know how to say it. i just always focused on someone else. well, do i have any? did i have any contacts among russians? well, of course , there were some there when i was doing an internship somewhere abroad. of course, there were some. yes the representatives of the russian federation themselves, they were different, so different, i can’t say that they were all equally stubborn, but you have to understand that the very fact that they participated
2:51 am
in those programs that were financed by the governments of the united states of america, or european countries, already says that they went through a certain selection, which means that in principle they were already not completely obnoxious rascals , yes, that is, so that they could still be considered as something human-like, yes, that is, at least the tails managed to fall off, they could be used for some reason to teach whether it was successful well, i will tell you in different ways, i even look at my facebook, yes, that is, and i will say that uh well , in different ways, yes, that is, but no, no one wrote to me because they clearly know my position and understand that well , i hardly need their sympathy. well
2:52 am
some qualities in order not to be angry, not to rejoice, not to rejoice and not to praise the actions of russia or the russian army, that is, we must honestly admit that, well, such people were simply not there, and we talked about britain. we still have a little less than 10 minutes we can't help but talk about the united states of america, let's devote the rest of the time to it, the west maintains unity in supporting ukraine, and this was told by the american writer, columnist of the washington post, maksbud, in an interview with rbc-ukraine , at the same time, he noted that the united states has problems with by the electorate of donald trump, however, it will not significantly affect the situation in our country quote in the last few months approximately half of republican sympathizers have begun to speak out against aid to ukraine i am talking about approximately half of republican sympathizers according to public opinion polls not about
2:53 am
half of republicans in congress the majority of republicans in congress support ukraine including mitch mcconnell to the senate minority leaders but i think the reality is that the majority of americans who used to support ukraine, the leadership of the congress, which was before ukraine, the biden administration is still for ukraine, so i do not want to exaggerate the importance of what is happening in the political plan and in general, max booth is an american writer - military historian, and valentina trump is another leader who can harm us , by the way, he promises that he and putin will come to an agreement in a day if he wins the second time with nothing else. what piskov agrees with him, i will tell you, so before drawing conclusions about trump's power, read boltan's book
2:54 am
john bolton, the room in which it happened, moreover, he is a republican. he is one of the hawks, well, if that is how he was positioned. he has been working in american politics for many years in the highest positions and he worked in the trump administration. and read how trump solved the issue with north korea in a flash. do you remember all these same people, how they went for a ride, how he perfectly settled the issue with iran, everything is fine, there are no problems , how fantastically he achieved a break in the issues of nato funding and how he resolved the issue of afghanistan, because there are so many of us he remembers how the troops were withdrawn from afghanistan, but for some reason they forget how and who stood at the origins of the decision to withdraw from afghanistan, he resolved the issue with iraq several times , yes, that is, what visionary, intelligent and pragmatic policy he pursued in syria, versions in kurdistan well, kurdistan, yes, that is, it has
2:55 am
meaning as a historical name, yes, and not as a political entity, so are there people who believe that donald trump can actually solve the problem well, there are such people, well, there are people in ukraine who believe that indeed petro oleksiyovych poroshenko prayed all night and that's why the ukrainian troops won, then they say that he couldn't do it when there was a tragedy in ilovaisk, well, it's the same question. and to trump and to those people , rational arguments against them are powerless . arguing with them is the same as arguing with supporters of the flat earth. in your opinion , will trump become the only candidate from the republicans in the presidential elections?
2:56 am
january, if i'm not mistaken. well, they're enough. they're tough, er, and the question arises. with such loud statements, er, so unappealing, er, uncompromising, somewhere . is he fulfilling the request of his audience, or is he just trying to dictate some kind of agenda, and this is a political-technological absolutely technique, well, he i just drove myself into a certain electoral ghetto, well, the problem with such figures, well, who use such technologies is that these technologies allow you to greatly strengthen your audience, but do not expand its expansion. that is, you know this they embody life. here you are fooling around with faith because it is absurd. well, the more absurd the delusion you will carry, this will mean that the more loyal
2:57 am
your supporters are. well, this means that even those who will start to waver to think no, well , this is already an interpreter even for me, what even for a trumpist roughly speaking, this is a cloud, or even for the republicans. yes, even to the extreme republicans, it is already a stupid cloud , or again, yes, that is , everyone has this limit, but the core will crystallize. after all, the company will start and all these constructions of trump will be criticized and then we will see how everything will be from the previous companies when russia was lost. the main thing is that this does not happen this time, that they were more attentive and vigilant. valentina. thank you , these half an hour, almost 40 minutes, flew by very quickly, we will remind you to the audience, valentin glynykh , a political scientist, was the guest of this hour
2:58 am
. we invite you once again on a random basis. it is absolutely logical what we are saying to you. take care and see you, thank you, meet the world with a smile, wink sweetly in a dream, engrave your uniqueness, understand the words of teachers, forget to erase yesterday, find among the ruins tomorrow, laugh in the morning, sing again in the evening, sleep peacefully in
2:59 am
chit, live again, this ukrainian live in peace and harmony thanks to you, when everything fades out light they continue to fight for life every day every day every second during the war and hospitals became fortresses of light where they heal not only the body but also the soul due to fatigue and pain they continue to protect the light of hope is their reward our smiles and hugs their joy another saved person they know the value of every life that is why they protect the light inside us we are grateful to the doctors who
3:00 am
continue to save people despite the darkness outside the window thank you state assistance for housing of internally displaced persons persons with disabilities and children receive uah 3,000 adults uah 2,000 per month and a completed month, regardless of the date of application for money, victims of war can also apply for assistance from international organizations. the conditions and a list of current programs are available on the website pomoko.gov.ua . find out more about the provision of financial assistance by calling the hotline of the ministry of integration of the temporarily
3:01 am
occupied territories . tell ukraine honestly how

8 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on