[000:00:00;00] thoughts about a what well, for example a, let's throw in such information as it will be perceived and , in principle, our society perceived it very simply well, well, and patches, well, give two, there are even more, i say even better, four again, the same great britain already announced it and provided ukraine with naval helicopters, which we need no less than helicopters , let's say it on the forehead as a military historian, a military historian . no, how to say this is not yet prohibited, unlike the germans, unlike even the americans, the british who do not calculate the risks, the british probably calculate the risks like no one else, that is why they provide this help, this is one

moment, the second moment is purely historical for ah-ah-ah britain's confrontation russia is conceptual, it is permanent, that is, for them there is nothing ukrainian about it, they, well, in the crimean war , it is a completely separate situation, the british have now lost the opportunity to pay tribute to their fallen soldiers there under a balaclava under ankerman, the french lost the opportunity to pay their respects at malakhov kurgan, the turks lost the opportunity to visit their military cemeteries there, that is, the crimean war or the eastern war, it’s actually a separate page , here we should talk, let’s say so, about such a complex perception of the british, they are very well remember the years 40-41, when they really fought britain alone, how difficult it was, the british remember very well the years 44-45, when britain resisted

the nazi missile attack by the nazi aviation and again, the british are grateful like no one else, they remember, uh, steven bacuck, a ukrainian by origin, who shot down the largest number of f-2 in it over london, that is , there are a lot of elements here and the british, well, this may not be a completely historical explanation, such an irrational british always from a certain moment they try to be on the side of the truth that they choose for themselves, plus one should not reject a possible british uh, well, in quotation marks, we will say the empire complex, that is, i myself was once an empire, britain understands what it is like to lose territory, and britain is a certain time, well let's say it did in its territories, maybe the same thing that was done by russia , but just after the rethinking, the change of the imperial paradigm and the role of britain shows us that if society and the state want to change, they are able to change and

the ecological state, which was once the largest empire , is currently the largest e -e to our allies and supporters of our desire for freedom. the main thing is that the state that was once an empire managed to turn from an empire into a commonwealth in some strange way that is not yet achievable for us, but who knows how it will return the story is good, from the story to the nomenclature, the main question. i think that the importance of which is understood even by children. now it’s whether we get missiles, and if so, what kind of new package do we need at all ? you know the average radius of action is somewhere maybe 5,700,000 kilometers kilometers, even better a thousand in general, that is, what, uh, 800 , approximately, as i understand it. yes, we need missiles that will allow us to solve tactical tasks

, operational tasks and, accordingly, strategic tasks. that is, again, you are absolutely correct they said, no matter what missiles are given to us, we should not give up either of those, not of those, not of those. it just really becomes a problem of the so-called long arm, which we need in order to make these direct collisions impossible . that is, the more we destroy the enemy and his logistics, he is there ammunition until the moment of entering into battle, it will be much better, much easier for our armed forces, we need it, weapons to see everything, everything goes in the paradigm up to 300 km, and yes, the attacks of the avengers well, because you need to hinder and not give the enemy the opportunity to advance. very we are often manipulated and thrown in. you know, there are some in the west who speak out or are skeptics or say that it is not necessary because it will be an excavation

, precisely because it is strikes - it is a defensive weapon in this case. crimea also needs something. and we know that there is a large number of these weapons in the future, for example, they will go somewhere in the direction of zaporizhzhia, from where the artillery will fire, or there will be s300 missiles that will go to tokmak, from where there will be strikes on zaporizhzhia or to other regions near the front of our cities, we have weapons. and we have information that is precisely confirmed that these weapons are there, we can hit them. it is clear that this target is defensive. at the same time, where to get weapons and what to do and there is even more closely rearranging its logistics and so on , these are no longer our issues, these are their problems, which we have to create them so and then, and

this would be ineffective, which disrupts their plans for us, that is, on the contrary, it creates prospects for our counteroffensive, because when i hear, do you know these, or do i read the analysis of even western colleagues that this is an escalation, that this is a strike on the territory of russia, listen for sure, i will tell you objectively how we can with a missile of 300 km e to beat and what and what will we give? well, they will drag it further tv , but the task is for them to drag it further, for them to stretch their supply and for them to have problems with it. well, this is the one. here it works in a stretch this year , it is extremely normal. tell me, please. er, this is the case almost comical, probably from the point of view of such a simple citizen, this installation in moscow on the roofs, what they put there were armor, it was interesting to ask the military, there is nothing comic here, eh , you just need to understand why this is done , they really put armor it's true that the three shells that are known to be standing

there create a certain dome directly above the center of moscow in the center where the kremlin is located, well, these are purely technical elements of the question here, more psychologically and ideologically, they they are constantly trying to mobilize their own society and this is exactly what was used tracing world war ii or , in their understanding, the great national spotlight in moscow is this idea, what is it called , aristotle, anti-aircraft guns on the square? that is, it is the mobilization of an image to create, it is the mobilization of an internal resource. this is an attempt to draw moscow into the war, because you will see that in no other russian place, like belgorod, there is voronezh, there are no borders, there are no problems on its own, this is

exactly what it is aimed at directly of the residents of moscow, he explained clearly. and gentlemen, i have literally one block of questions left, and it concerns only one event, which i hope will happen in the future. we are now cooperating very well with our partners. are they supplying us with weapons? is it possible for ukraine to organize the production of its own weapons? can we relying on the help of partners , start to gradually adjust this issue of missiles ukraine, well, the topic of missiles is not at all foreign to us here , so what else can we do unmanned aerial vehicles for sure let's do it what ukraine produced independently even during the times of the soviet union and already as an independent state, it is you, the missile technology of various variants is assembled correctly, it is missile defense complexes, and it is strategic intercontinental ballistic missiles. ukraine produced a small closed cycle of tank production. ukraine received a closed cycle

of armored tank production is the participation of armored vehicles there btr-3 btr-4 and ukraine is capable of creating artillery weapons - this is bohdana ukraine had its own production or production of rifle license weapons ukraine had its own technologies for the production of means of rep means of barrels, that is, there are a huge number of options. the question is that it is more profitable for us to produce what is more profitable for us to purchase and the question of the safety and continuity of this production . a little more to rammstein ii in your opinion, with what position ukrainian ukrainian ukraine ukrainian delegation needs to go there what to demand and well i don't know what to say

what to say, i would appeal to western doctrines and to the textbooks from which they studied, everything is written there if they find the right pages and present them to our partners or to the military in the first place and let them read what we want and what we want to get them they understand very well and will be on our side, it is necessary to prove to the military of nato or the military of a particular country that everything is necessary. because they understand it perfectly well, when we were talking there, the british wanted to give a flash to the apache because they also took it from the classics. they said, well, okay, we will give tanks even to a company, but for it we need artillery, we must also provide air support, why? well, you know how the people say because that's what the book says. well, the answer is obvious. that's what we were taught. that's how we understand that these weapons must be used comprehensively, and that's what

's called coordination. they understood it, and i think that this is the same understanding in other countries. should be present, vasyl, i fully support what was said, uh, we need to appeal to our partners, their between the doctors , their own explanations and their theoretical understandings, and in a purely military-technical sense, in a tactical sense, but also impose on it, let’s say, their political understanding doctrinal understanding to recall those doctrines that existed there during the last 50-70 years after the end of the second world war, what they were aimed at , because in fact everything that is happening now can still be said a little distortion distorted reflection of tom klentsev's techno-thrillers in which he described the events of the confrontation of nato countries with the soviet union and now these are the pages

of his works, they simply turned into reality, only the place of battle , unfortunately, became the territory of ukraine, well, thank you very much for this conversation many things were simply clarified, and a few showed what to think about and what to think about at all now. and what to pay attention to, you can also not pay attention to yet . and what is worth it, i will remind all viewers who as i hope you watched this conversation with interest, as guests today were mr. oleksandr musienko, head of the center for military legal studies and mr. vasyl pavlov - military historian, head of the internal communications expert group

of the ministry of defense of ukraine. of course, after the ninth day , thank you , when you shoot, it is very important to see these snipers see better than all targets, that's why today our program is about them. best of all, they look at those targets better and hit the most dangerous, the most difficult targets, the most difficult targets

of the combat operations for today are visiting special-purpose sniper and amateur shooter yaroslav, and we will try to figure out how to shoot in the manner of a marksman, a marksman , a topihot infantry starter, a sniper conducts aimed rapid fire at various distances 50 150-200 500 years ago , our special forces officer will work with a regular sight mantivochka ar-10 platform , again a semi-automatic sniper rifle that is in service today of our special forces troops and mr. yaroslav will shoot from the same ar system, but with

a special sight with a laser rangefinder, we have two shooters at the position. we have four groups of targets. the first group is located approximately 200-300 meters away. the next group of targets is located a little further at a distance of 300 + the third group of targets is located at a distance of up to 500 meters for each archer a separate letter yaroslav b. sniper special forces officer zet and the farthest targets that are at a distance of 700 meters are targets

red optics try sharpening a telescope on a rifle were made at the beginning of the 17th century in the netherlands however, the fragile optics fell apart during a shot american gunsmiths made a breakthrough in the 19th century when they decided to abandon the front sight and stretched two thin metal threads crosswise in the tube of the telescope in 1850 inventor from italy , the name of this time, introduced rotating prisms , this system was subsequently improved in 1949. frederic calles invented an optical sight with a variable magnification and the same magnification increased to 20 modern sights of companies such as trekin-point are a ballistic computer with a laser rangefinder, a thermal imager, a hook control system , sensors to take into account corrections for temperature and air humidity, height, angle of inclination, force and direction of the wind, a total of 11 environmental variables from this shooting we want

figure out how quickly it is possible to hit targets at different distances, how effective the so-called marksmanship will be, so for infantry combat, so let's start now, i'll take the little ones, i'm ready to fire, zet is hit, lviv hit let's go let's work yellow zed not hit and past and hit 300 meters worked out one native shot

each 500 is waiting for us past yaroslav try once more to break through the bags 500 m turned out to be difficult for both a professional and an amateur z is hit and still standing, the axle is not so easy as in the body, i show you how to correctly make a shot so that the shot is the most comfortable, so let's go to practice so that you are not afraid that the rifle will hit you or do something else to you.

laying relaxed. you see, i can talk to you. i have both eyes open . nothing shakes me. i calmly aim at the target . and then i take a deep breath and when i want to exhale, at this moment, i press smoothly, i press the trigger. i have questions. i feel the pulse moving the rifle, look. you don't need to press the rifle into the shoulder, we will shoot with free recoil , therefore the butt itself should only touch the shoulders. you should not, here, i just

put my hand, you made a forward movement, the shoulder is not you need to do this, you just need to control that your rifle is here, you don't need to push it, look at one more small nuance, try not to close the other eye, try to look with two eyes, you can just lean over , squint your eye and try to open the bow , but also the bow, shoot at them come on, i have a question, i can't make an accurate shot , because when before the shot, i already have a dark dark outline floating in my head, constantly look , try to put your eye a little closer to the sight. well

you can just pull up a little bit to the sight. you can just be very far and catch the sound. during the american civil war, they played a big role in the battle of gettysburg , the confederates bought 200 sniper rifles of the votworth system for their sharpshooters, so they called marksmen on at an incredible distance of more than a kilometer, at least three enemy generals were destroyed by the northern government sniper battalions were personally formed by harembardan, the designer of the bag, the shooting accuracy of bushmen armed with optical devices during the anglo-buza war gave birth to the classic british saying from one match, three do not light a cigarette

in the first world war on the part of british snipers from the colonies , thanks to the ability to disguise, in particular, the canadian indian francis spega magabu destroyed 378 teutons in the battle for the window, a third of the losses was attributed to the japanese by an american sniper in 1953. the usa began to arm maxmen with electronic optical sights. they were in every infantry unit of the american army when it is inconvenient . is it from some uh, well, from some table, that is, sometimes it can be there , a tripod, sometimes it can even be a twin shoulder, well, there are different situations and

it is unpleasant to spend cold nights somewhere in the forest or in a plantation or in a field, the situation may be that at the moment it looks like a target, but it is not advisable to shoot , good ammunition is very well suited for police sniping, the working distance is up to 800 meters per 100 m, the range of this bullet is 3 cm at 300 m, that's 9 cm, the wiring was well worked out , not 500. let's see what will happen there

. 700 , you'll show. this difficult task is relatively close to 200-300, he hit it quite easily, 500 was given to him well, it was given to him with difficulty, let's say so , but he was not able to hit 700 at all no scopes did not help him in this, so the main exhibitions are that you need to train, weapon culture , culture begins with training for sniping - this is a science. there are a lot of nuances

, such as correction for the wind or, uh , the delay of breathing from the breath, because a lot depends on the position of the body, so we ask a couple of tips from our sniper a professional who will comment on the shooting that just took place, what do you say? well, i will say that this scope is better at a long distance than an electronic one because it does not introduce lateral corrections. and i can bet my salary that a person missed only because he did not take corrections in the wind, you just had to move the lateral corrections with a net to the side and it would have landed calmly . i think without problems, as we see, professionalism

solves everything, but you have no place on our land, this is the time of each of us, protect your own, there are no words there are no songs for us to glorify you heroes that on a difficult day bloody despair you did not lay down your weapons, you bravely went into battle even though the enemy was terrible harsh the soul was not young before a stronger word of submission pieces fifth

anniversary of the battle cool is our strength in unity we support the armed forces of ukraine we will donate a volunteer we will fight for our own this winter over a million ukrainians need housing you have the opportunity to accept refugees from the war zone - this is just the announcement on the website of the shelters victory is one for all shelter yours like a ray under the palm of a child light in ukraine it does not disappear, it hides in small and large boxes, in an endless web of connections and in hiding places with a characteristic sound, because light chooses places from where it does not want

to go. then those who miss in the dark come to it, light knows how to be friends with the best , only it does not run away from them allow yourself to be shared and let the light be all that is hidden from us. we already know how to find it, and therefore

the darkness will certainly retreat forever , our weapon is the truth. congratulations , the inter information service joins the marathon on the front line of the information front, our people