[000:00:00;00] yuriy falshtynskyi, doctor of historical sciences, political scientist, was on the espresso broadcast and that conversation was devoted to the internal processes in russia, understanding the psychology of russian war criminals who are ready to continue the war. which will present you with the news of this hour , i will be back literally in a few minutes thank you thank you very much congratulations in this issue i will talk about the consequences of russian shelling regions of ukraine, also about how our anti-aircraft fighters are trained on anti-aircraft systems, sample well, and about whether there is electricity in all regions of our country

, 347 days of full-scale war between russia and ukraine continues for your attention, news on espresso , anzhelika sezonenko works in the studio, more than 200,000 subscribers in odesa already with light, another 280,000 have a very limited energy supply after the accident due to a difficult situation in educational institutions, forced holidays have been announced . on february 6 and 7 , regular ukrenergo groups will work in ambassadorial mode in all full-time kindergartens restores energy facilities in the region , the company primarily focused on one of them, its repair will allow the restoration of power to odessa and the odesa region as soon as possible, the work is planned to be completed by friday, by that time powerful generators will be working in the city , noted the chairman of the board, volodymyr kudrytskyi, the generator, they are already in quite a large number came to odesa and their connection to

critical infrastructure facilities is taking place according to the schedule of such connection, which i said is expected what will be mitigated from the scheme 2-12 to here to the scheme 2:10 i.e. 2 hours there is light 10 no 2.8 two rockets out of 300 were fired in the morning by the russians in the middle of the city of kharkiv, one hit the central building of the tower, the second fell among residential buildings and damaged seven surrounding buildings, five were injured kharkiv residents where they will live now people will find out in the story the first rocket fell near a four-story building windows were blown out in all the surrounding houses and in this house the walls in the basement were also burnt garbage caught fire and the fire was quickly put out people hurriedly

collect things and leave here is this family a retired couple is going to see their daughter four residents of the surrounding houses are injured they have experienced great stress and do not want to talk two people have been taken to the hospital it is a woman and a man everyone else has been given help at the scene anyway at this time they refused to be transported to a hospital near the place of arrival many residential buildings had their windows blown out in seven buildings , people who were not injured and can get to their apartments are collecting whole things and removing glass from broken windows, light and heating disappeared due to shelling on the street below zero, so it’s impossible to live here for the time being, we’ll live here, there’s a court. well, there’s a coma, there’s a complex. where can we move

? so everything’s fine. a rocket hit the university of urban economy and demolished the attic floors of the central building. one man, a security guard, who happened to be at work there, was destroyed . structures of the fifth and partial fourth floors, and there was also a fire on an area of ​​50 m² . utility workers help people with windows and clean the street so that they can warm up at least a little in the cold. volunteers treat everyone to coffee and goodies . j coffee is hot. i have a teacup. i blew up everyone who has nowhere

to live. they will be resettled in dormitories . the administration of the district emphasized that for now they are going around the residents to find out if they need help. from kharkiv for the espresso tv channel , the russians also shelled sumshchyna twice today in the morning, the enemy hit with a 120-millimeter caliber in the area of ​​the settlement of novovasilivka, three explosions were heard, they reported in the operational command, north during the day, the occupiers shelled the village of seredyna buda, four explosions were recorded there, information on civilian casualties and damage to the infrastructure is being clarified, as usual , the russians are hitting civilian buildings in the morning, the occupiers caught the police in kherson due to an enemy attack , a fire broke out, a two-story building of an educational institution caught fire, the total area 100 m², the state emergency service reported, rescuers

put out the fire, fortunately there were no dead or injured one person was injured, the victim is in the hospital, medics provide him with the necessary assistance in the morning, the russians covered chernobaivka with massive fire, enemy shells damaged six residential buildings , the kherson regional military administration noted that vital communications, power lines, gas pipelines and water pipes were also destroyed. russians, in particular, gasoline , diesel, kerosene, oil and fuel oil, the exception is only for bulgaria and croatia, which will be able to buy raw materials until the end of this year, as well as the czech republic, which for the time being will purchase russian diesel, in addition, several european countries

that have no alternative will use russian pipeline oil for vessels that were loaded until february 5, a transition period of 55 days will apply, they are destroying everything ukrainian , the russian occupiers are burning ukrainian books , seizing them from the funds of general and school libraries, the center of national resistance in the temporarily occupied rovenki in the luhansk region reports that there have been recorded cases of mass burning of ukrainian books in local boiler houses, the russians justify themselves by removing alleged nazi literature, but the list includes absolutely all of our writing on the united platform 24 9 months during this time 278 million 890,000 and one dollar were collected in support of ukraine

, the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi reported that the smallest contribution was set at one conditional unit and the largest - 3 million 976 $. also within the framework of the light-up ukraine project, 50 generators were purchased, which have already arrived at hospitals , and six were installed at energy facilities chess systems, and more than uah 500 million were collected for the restoration of housing, the platform became operational in turkey in may to unite the efforts of international partners to support ukraine in the defense of the sky, ukrainian anti-aircraft fighters went to learn how to control the air defense systems of the mamba air defense system, ukraine will receive these complexes from france and italy, noted the commander of the air forces of mykola oleschuk, the military will graduate in the spring and come to ukraine armed with these systems, the complex

of saints is able to successfully fight not only with enemy combat aircraft and with cruise and ballistic missiles, the interception range is about 120 km, it can target up to 16 targets at the same time, in order to save her life , the police evacuated another resident of nevsky in the luhansk region. people have to sit in basements a few days ago i decided to leave for relatives in a safer region, at the same time more than 140 people still remain in nevsky. they refuse to evacuate because they do not

they want to leave their homes and livestock, the head of the region, serhii gaidai, emphasizes, already in their native land, two of our children, whom the occupiers illegally took to russia, were returned home , two sisters were deported together with their mother from luhansk oblast to slaughter in russia. their older sister appealed after the girls' return, she took them under their care, the family is now together in volyn , this is his positive story, i will end this issue vitaly portnikov further on espresso

be with us cinema television sport music education free people have a choice choose what you want on megogo vasyl zima's big broadcast my name is vasyl zima two hours of air time until 21:00 two hours of your time we will talk about the most important thing two hours to learn about the war joins our broadcast serhiy zgoretska, military results of the day and what is the world like? what in the world will yury the physicist tell for two hours to stay up to date with economic news? oleksandr borshchagivtsi advised us. he tells us about the economy during the war and new sports. yevhen pastukhov is ready to speak lena is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of her favorite presenters, about culture during the war, or something else that many people have become like, maybe the weather will give us some optimism, ms. natalka didenko is ready to tell us, and we will also have distinguished guests of the studio today, volodymyr hryshko , if everything goes well well, the events of the day in two hours

, vasyl's big broadcast in the winter, a project for intelligent and caring people, in the evening , we will continue the broadcast on the espresso tv channel. of international relations of shevchenko kyiv national university, first vice-president of the ukrainian association of international law and judge of the european court of human rights so, mykola, i congratulate you, mr. vitaly, let's try to understand what the decision of the esl on the recognition of the occupation of donbas by the russian federation in 2014 means. year, to what extent this decision can now affect the course of events, well, from a purely legal point of view , from the point of view of the european court of human rights

, it was necessary to make sure that the court has use action to consider this case in other words that the numerous violations of human rights that ukraine and the netherlands claim in their statements that took place on the territory of the luhansk donetsk regions of ukraine are such that russia is responsible for them or this territory was controlled by it or at least from the point of view of the convention with of human rights, the first article of this convention of the usa of russia applied to this event and this was established by the court in this decision , which is of an interim nature, but with all its temporary nature, it corresponds to the main political and legal argument put forward by the russian federation in 2014 is that ukraine is fighting separatists there and ukraine is not there and its armed forces are not there. so here i did not believe it and in great detail in 120 paragraphs devoted only to this issue with evidence shows why

this is not the case and why will this case be considered further from the point of view of establishing certain violations, namely on the part of the russian federation, say in principle that the russian federation has now withdrawn from the council of europe from the european court of human rights - this is completely destroys international jurisdiction over its e-e court decisions since russia was excluded by the betrayal of europe, it is very important that it did not leave, it was excluded by the betrayal of europe, and nevertheless, what obligations under the european convention on human rights e-e remained in force they still remain in the sense that it concerns the period from the moment of its exclusion plus six months, that is, until september 16, 2022 , all possible violations of the conventions committed by russia. they remain under the jurisdiction

of the court, and russia from the point of view of international law obliged to comply with the court's decision is another matter. that since march 22, since the actual exclusion of the russian federation from the organization, russia does not communicate with the court, does not respond to all these procedural messages that are sent to it, it is related to do this in any case and this means that the court had to adapt its procedure, so to speak , to switch to the so-called default procedure . when the party does not appear and when the party does not communicate with the court, this does not prevent the court from working. it is another matter that the court has slightly different rules in each case. by the way, to prove, i.e., he did not complain to the russian federation, it is necessary to prove to the applicant the facts that he has , at least to give all the arguments he has, and then the court will determine how well -founded they are, and in principle, that the russian federation has changed its constitution regarding exit-exclusion of treason to europe before exiting the esl and determined the priority of domestic legislation over international, did this make

all appeals to the european court of human rights fictitious? rain wants to fulfill willingly does not fulfill well, the fact is that the human rights protection system that exists in europe is based on certain fundamental ideas, the first main idea is that it unites like-minded states as a state, it unites those states that sincerely and seriously strive to be states where the rule of law prevails, where human rights are ensured and in which there is actually democracy, if this is not the case, then there is no point in staying in this system for the state. well, it is very limited, well, if there are any problems, then this system can help the state to return to the right path, but if the state does not have such a desire, then no council of europe will help in any other matter, since they agreed to the jurisdiction of the european court of human rights when they joined the council of europe, then this is

an international judicial institution that has the right to make the appropriate decision and already this decision is the basis for action by international organizations and by individual states, say this. so, when for many years after russia's attack on ukraine in 2014, our european colleagues they said that it is necessary to preserve russia's membership in the council of europe, otherwise russian citizens will not be able to apply to the european court of human rights, they actually abandoned the sanctions against the russian delegation in the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe, why was this stupidity, what was the desire to find some real humanitarian opportunities for russians -e, my current status as a judge is spl limits me in the freedom of eruption in this sense, so i will answer a little diplomatically, but the truth is that this argument really sounded very

it's loud that the citizens of russia should keep the opportunity to apply to the ecj and therefore let's not push russia to finally leave this club and leave this organization , everyone can see the results. i think that the 22nd year of the ecv allowed everyone who had some illusions wake up very seriously and what we will say even we can read the decision about admissibility in the interstate case regarding the east of ukraine ukraine-netherlands against the russian federation - these are things that definitely came to me under the influence of the events of the last year, at least no one can ignore them. and in general , what will this case be considered ? what will it really mean now ? people or three, yes, it happened on the basis

of the criminal code of the netherlands, here we are talking about a huge number of different kinds of violations of human rights, which were committed, as the applicants claim, in the territory of the east of the eastern regions of ukraine on the part of the russian federation. that is, it goes beyond the situation with flight mh14, although of course it also covers it. what will this mean? well, the court must fulfill its function. what is the purpose of the court before the case? and it is required to give a legal answer to what happened there? who is responsible for it? other states must implement it. politicians must. and in general , what do i want to say? we still have a case . case ukraine v. russia number 10, which already concerns the events after the large-scale invasion. we have another old case where

admissibility was also recognized, which concerns crimea. there are cases that have not yet been considered, but will be considered, which concern the kerch strait there, which concern the company of murders. this was organized by the russian federation abroad and its political opponents, etc. , so the function of the court is to give legal answers for this, but when dramatic events occur, when violence occurs violent crime even well, if it is not from the life of christ, not interstate, not war, but if a violent crime occurs in the process of violence, then the first thing we do is try to ourselves, with the help of our neighbors , with the help of the police, stop the person who commits this crime, detain him, take him to court, and then the court will try him. yes, and here we have a situation where the process is still ongoing, that is, the crime continues, but the court is already

being called, so the court will speak. it has a judicial function and it has introduced these functions, but the military response and the political response and economic response. they should be immediate and be preceded by what is happening now with the jurisdiction of the european court of human rights regarding all those cases that may be related to the russian-ukrainian war. by the way, who will complain about russia or ukraine or even possible complaints about ukraine, how will it look to you? of course, complaints are possible . there are thousands of complaints from individuals, both against individual russia and against ukraine separately , as well as products of both countries at the same time. for example, statements that have not been considered regarding ukraine. so 7,000 is the situation of the russian-ukrainian war. well, so many of them were sent. everyone probably remembers

the lawyers, at least this story. it turned out that there was only one figure, so to speak, the center in russia from which all these were sent. applications and championships are more numerous, but otherwise, the applications meet all the formal requirements and it is necessary to further consider them accordingly to determine what to do with them, whether they are acceptable, whether there are violations or not, if they are comparable, etc., there are also complaints against the russian federation, everything will be considered by the court, it is another matter that the court can show enough of your or your approaches if necessary because it is necessary to repeat the same thing, especially under the circumstances when the russian federation is excluded, for sure the court may not make sense, the court can combine certain cases it can use even a mechanism, let's say, of refusing to consider certain cases that at this stage do not affect anything, but with the possibility of their renewal in the future, that is, the court has the freedom to maneuver one way or another, it has disappeared, it is

the duty to consider them, and it purely understands all the priority of these issues, because it is the maintenance of the so-called european public partnership. and tell me, how do you generally consider the situation related to ukraine's implementation of the decisions of the european court of human rights ? the european union is huge. i would say one of the largest, if not the largest, among all states, a member of the council of europe. it is clear that during a large-scale war, no one particularly demands that ukraine solve the problems that there for 15-20 or more years, and it will not be with the same intensity as before, but one way or another, the ukrainian state will have to deal with it. we have not yet implemented, let's say , the first pilot decision against ukraine in the case of ivanov and ukraine, where it is about systematic non-fulfillment of the final

of court decisions in ukraine, we have not executed the decision in the second pilot case, which concerns e-hearers against ukraine, which concerns improper conditions of detention in pretrial detention centers , we have not executed groups of other so-called pilot cases, that is, they show systemic problems, this is also a proper investigation of allegations of provocation, this is also a question of too long consideration of civil disputes in courts, and so on . you need to protect yourself and all of europe during this war. what do you think the situation with human rights will look like after all those beasts? russia did it during this war , when all the values ​​that

were acceptable in the 21st century were essentially leveled. things, russia was a member of the council of europe, do you mean first of all human rights in ukraine or in europe in general in europe in order not to condemn him ? this is exactly what it is about, why these cases are related to the war, why they are a priority for the european court of human rights, and for this reason, the fundamental most basic values ​​on which europe is built, on which europe in general, after the second world war, built its societies why exactly did they create the european court of human rights and all this mechanism in order for the states to remain democratic, for them to be peaceful, for them to ensure the happy individual development of people, etc. and all this is not there, we returned to the situation in essence when the council of europe was not even

created yet, they only dreamed that such a mechanism was possible, therefore definitely this must be condemned decisively, appropriate conclusions must be drawn because even without war in general in europe the situation with human rights essentially worsened every year due to the struggle for parameters, and it is impossible not to see that, that is why these military issues must be solved first of all and from a legal point of view, if there are any decisions in favor of ukrainian citizens who will condemn the russian federation, demand material compensation, and russia will not pay attention to this, what is the mechanism for obtaining such compensation in this situation, the mechanism is such that, well, first of all, legally, russia will have an obligation - it is to pay these compensations and further, regarding the fulfillment of this duty, we are talking about the activities of the committee of ministers of the council of europe, which establishes

appropriate recommendations, so to speak, to other states. i do not rule out the possibility. it is possible to carry it out at the expense of the property of the russian federation and funds that exist abroad, but for this eus in itself it is only the first stage , there will be necessary the decision of the national the legislator and the national judge of this state in question. well, as for the rest, this is a political process. we live , so to speak, with the hope that after the end of this war, after the victory of ukraine and the victory of europe, a moment will come when the russian federation can still will still return to the family of civilized states, well, these debts will not disappear anywhere, they will have to be paid in the same way as other decisions of the european union from the point of view of ensuring the human rights of all

countries, while this will happen with this money, you you can get the heirs of the victims for the victims themselves, what is the problem, it is a matter of time, of course, but you understand the european court of human rights, in any case, this is international justice. so, in any case, it is not an ambulance, that is, international justice, it enters speak into the game only when nothing can be earned at the state level and people sometimes search for the truth there for tens of years in their own country before they reach the european court of human rights , definitely this stretches for generations and the european court of human affairs itself is a big the institution is a serious institution, yes, 46 judges, 650 employees of the secretariat, etc., they all work, as they say, against the bee , but uh, it’s still 700 million europeans, if you don’t educate , there are russians who have the opportunity to apply to this court, that is, if these processes are functioning normally in the respective states, one court from taras was and will never provide it . thank you, mr. mykola hnatovsky, candidate of legal

sciences at the center here in the international affairs of the kyiv national university and a judge of the court of human rights was with us on the air now. from the legal issues, let's talk about the main thing, we will talk about another crisis in the european region - the balkans, maria galatii, an expert on the balkans , a candidate of political sciences, we are in touch , congratulations, mr. maria, congratulations well, there are many stories here. well, let's start with the kosovo track , because this week the serbian parliament, after a heated debate, passed a decision according to which it approves the government's program regarding the solution to this issue , the concession that serbia must make in order to continue its european integration from the perspective of kosovo, but many say that this in fact, it's a game because all these promises made by the president of serbia, uchich, are not very realistic to be fulfilled. well, let's say that serbia is ready to agree to kosovo becoming

a member of the united nations, but i can't imagine that russia agreed to this well, and so on, to what extent is it really such a blow to serbian interests, i say this oleksandr vuch well, in fact, i think that for serbia, this is the only way at the moment, because its big partner russia is becoming such an isolated partner, many countries are isolating russia and not to work arrogantly, serbia depends not only on russia, it also depends on the european union , and despite the fact that support for european integration is decreasing in serbia , serbia still wants it, because the french and german plans have now promised, and it is not very open, but what sounds, at least in the media, is the fact that serbia will receive an accelerated path of integration into the eu and also certain financial infusions is very important for