[000:00:00;00] because you can somehow generalize them from people systematically. are these rather very isolated cases from what i can see and what is in social networks and on the news and then appeals? these are still isolated cases that for some reason most often happen in odessa or e-e in western ukraine in the western regions, for example, there in zakarpattia oblast, also, especially at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, there were frequent cases when ordinary passers-by were simply caught on the street, put in a car and sent e-e to the collection center however, i would not say that this is a mass phenomenon and these are after all isolated cases, because if it were a mass phenomenon , there would be much more such riddles in the networks in appeals to lawyers. well, i don’t know even isolated

cases, we are talking about them correctly noted that ukraine is not russia - it is so desirable that it is not desirable, but all this should take place within the limits of the law and in general, by the way, the last question, and the legislation is perfect in this context in ukraine, except for at least some branch of legislation that i am perfect, this is rhetorical the question is so imperfect, it means that i understood you and there is room for improvement, for example, a legislator , the same cabinet or the verkhovna rada could er when it was clear at the beginning of the war that the mechanics of serving summonses are imperfect and in er has many shortcomings that can be a legal way to actually avoid mobilization , it is simply necessary to know your rights, to know the duties of the official representatives

of the police military commissions, and in fact it would be possible to avoid mobilization and the state, taking into account the speed and the resolutions and laws that were adopted especially at the beginning of the war, it is possible to arrange the summons in the delivery mechanism in the same way for the period of martial law, because currently there is only a delivery mechanism and the procedure for including trips to conscription for military service is carried out according to the law of martial law, that is, by the way, i also heard such an opinion from er, from the people deputies, i think there was even such an opinion, but let's make a call to the military committee there through the action of the electronic do you think such an opinion has such a forecast any chance of existence in the future right i

doubt that such a thing will happen in principle technically it seems to me that it is possible to implement a mechanism for notifying registered citizens that he has received a summons to serve, but how to confirm the fact that such a citizen has received an electronic digital signature through action, but who is not obliged by law to check any -what are the notifications on the mobile phone there in the action application, and the action can , for example, be registered, but the phone has changed, the action has not been set, and that’s all, then what method will the notification be? it seems to me that theoretically it is technically possible to do this however, in practice, i do not believe that such a mechanism will happen. thank you very much for your comment. we talked about the process of serving summonses in ukraine. andriy novak, the lawyer

of the miller law firm, was on radio svoboda . thank you very much. thank you very much. the prison, that is, tomorrow in the moscow region with vladimir putin, lukashenko , according to him, will discuss the development of integration within the framework of the union state, as well as issues of security and defense, well, this is literally a quote lukashenko's upcoming visit to russia also confirmed by the press secretary of the kremlin, dmytro piskov, according to him, this is also expected to be a quote, a thorough conversation, on the eve of pro-kremlin telegram channels , reports began to appear that putin's message to the federal assembly, which is scheduled for february 21, may contain integration initiatives up to the creation some kind of state entity with the participation of russia in belarus, as well as the self-proclaimed abkhazia and south ossetia - they do not comment on this in the kremlin, but lukashenko

literally spoke in minsk the day before with foreign journalists, he did not comment on the creation of the so-called ussr 2:0. speaking about the war in ukraine , lukashenko refused to call russia's actions an invasion and blamed ukraine and western countries for the outbreak of the war. at the same time, he stated that belarus was not going to introduce its troops into the territory of ukraine and the belarusian army can be included in the war, they say, only in the event of aggression from ukraine, according to him, the russian military is stationed in belarus only to protect the country, and it is ready to fight with the russians together with the territory belarus will show only one thing if they want one soldier with a gun from there, idiots are killing my people in our territory. and at this meeting with journalists, lukashenko said that belarus has no intention of announcing mobilization and called on citizens to live peacefully. what forces and

resources has russia concentrated in belarus? are they enough ? for another attack from the side of the belarusian border, we will also talk about this today. well, what is happening in belarus itself against the background of these next russian attacks , we will talk right now before the broadcast pavlo slyunkina, an analyst at the european council on international relations, joins in . good evening. good evening. well, yesterday, lukashenko met with international journalists. by chance, is it so planned that two days before the meeting with putin, he gathered a group of western journalists, uh, and he planned to have a conflict with married journalists. yana is called the great conversation with alexander lukashenko, and i did not plan to hold it. 14 february, on the day of all lovers, and then at the last moment for some reason they canceled it, they said

that it would not take place and they wanted honey honey after putin put the date of his appeal under the hammer, and i understand that they would also appeal to dependent journalists anyway i will see him anyway, and i didn't invite several journalists from those who were invited to the big occasion again to this one. here is the little sister who you beat her to today. by the way, lukashenko said that this is a big conversation that is still planned will take place, but commenting on this meeting, he said in the original language , the original is honest, the meeting was not planned, the press secretary did not just report that we have such a powerful army, especially foreign journalists , russians. if we don't cross paths for a few minutes, that is, it seemed to me that it was before the meeting with putin, he just wanted to send some signals to someone

, well, it's quite difficult for me to say what it is the beatnik and the signals are the sky . now i will say that russia is recovering and did not attack ukraine, and it used to defend belarus there , allegedly in this war, but they are all leading it. well, it’s just that. it’s just nonsense . it’s absolutely not true, and it’s one and a half kinds of appeals to the people of belarus. eh, some political commentators joke that such a press agent of putin and i have already prepared it ahead of time, and i do not work according to the same narratives that the kremlin will try , and irostav lives all over the world and talks about his television with alexander lukashenko and one

of the voices of such a -a kak eto samoye russian ceramist, but what do you expect? what can this meeting be about ? i am in belarus in the war, he can go, then he will say, well, how can i? well, yesterday in the western world, i promised that there will be no war or maybe some other reasons for them meetings, this is an absolutely incorrect discourse of understanding, especially in all ukrainian information and political spaces, and those who believe that putin is forcing lukashenko to join his army in the war against ukraine, this is absolutely not correct. helps lukashenko and bypasses sanctions a-a and helps with money in return lukashenko allows him to do something else, what else do you see, shelling your cities like this, yumz

will allow to enter the territory on february 26 ukraine formed if you capture kyiv and you live in the account, it happened with his consent, he trains mobilized people who are russian soldiers who then come to kill ukrainians and the net, here is karime, we analyze the russian-ukrainian economic relations there , yagunyama vladimir putin compensates him for everything and cause consequences - international sanktsii ion gives him loans and allows him not to pay on these loans, ah- a , vladimir putin is a caliph. we would see a different state of the fifth wheel because vladimir putin has a million options of how alexander lukashenko will force himself to disloyalty and lukashenko himself will prepare it , that's exactly what i'm leading there. i don't use it to fight in ukraine like

this . well, the reason is simply god, it's not profitable for putin, not lukashenko . the belarusian army is small enough for its personnel. consists of 85 photos of the same mobs and those who are mobilizing like this in ukraine, the last ones there are 10-15,000 человек and they absolutely do not change anything, here the picture of the war in ukraine will not change, at the same time alexander lukashenko will destroy the very weapon that you have defended me since 2020, because i can hold on to power, and in the 20th year, he held on only for kosh, because he sent armed men to kill his citizens there, so ah, and all the time now he has to drive the government’s thing with a lip and i there was no one to choose it don't bring anything to putin, because 10-15,000 people won't bring any impressive results. and you have ukraine that will start to be shelled and you, uh, the deployment points of the russian troops on the territory of belarus

are being trained, and the russian military servicemen are located, where are the equipment from where to shoot вашу корады while ukraine is afraid that lukashenko and she will provoke it on his own, lukashenko is quite difficult to provoke it, because he wants it on his own hand. that it is lodz, mayor putin also understands that he will throw the belarusian army into the fire and i will die there for just 2-3 months, maybe once a month , and the ion from this will destroy the bridgehead in the shortest way to kiev and silence will train him and rejoice and him soldiers and mark have something to carry, indeed, a threat to ukrainian cities, and maksym will be opened. a new front will be opened , and belarus was more and more predominantly and more than in

belarus. и вы дустомеешь в всех ето рацінальные фактиров ионная гоницистные i did not go to belarus, the armies will not join them, this is their joint solution, therefore , pavlo is not looking for anything new here. i will also tell the audience why i am in the past, you were an employee of the ministry of foreign affairs of belarus, you have diplomatic experience and just you said the thesis that lukashenko allowed putin to do whatever putin wants on the territory of ukraine. then i have a question for you. why do you think kyiv still hasn't closed its diplomatic office in belarus? that i said that in ukraine the holy perception dominates that alexander lukashenko competes with him without any pressure from moscow so that you and the russians really want the volume of the ritual nakiroval and it is you who oppose it, that's why ukraine will try to cover up goethe's contacts, that's not what the attempts are, i'm preparing

so ot svoich krynytsei that in ukraine there are relations. these are diplomatic and only diplomatic, but also power channels with the regime of oleksandr lukashenka, through which i do not exchange all information and signs, if there were any red marks , i did not want to cross one another. that is why it is clear that the ukrainian authorities are very, very cautious. let's say that i now very much want to promote the belarusian democratic forces, as well as not to provoke lukashenko, and-and, for that, and there are ukrainian ambassadors in minsk , as well as yon- otherwise, he argued for hot information that can be kept for a change because while the regime of alexander lukashenko , the ukrainian authorities do not put it at 1:50 with vladimir putin. so i perceive him as a very loyal regime, but still in ukraine, do you think that alexander lukashenko may still not be there

, that putin will not be allowed to do this, that they may resist something, even though the whole well, i ’m flying anyway. what, where is he? and i also want to note here that in fact representatives of the ukrainian authorities very often say this thesis that er belarus is occupied by russia. occupation is everything hummingbirds were swimming, we didn't have any order in the belarusian one, and they appointed us a ceramicist ministry. it's another illusion , and a russian occupation administration would have been created. to put it mildly , the russian tanks went there, they kept niki palaces of non -dependence. lukashenko may have appointed his own. гоников человека and let this is such a loyal regime, so here is a puppet in a regime that , well, in principle, fulfills most of what moscow wants, and uh, alexander lukashenko

will put himself in such a position in 2020 minsk is worthy of mike pompeo and admirkova, how to get rid of russian oil, how to reduce its consumption, how to buy american oil, how to import oil from lithuania, about poland, about ukraine, as a pole with the european union, and even at that time, good things were developing, and then ion lost the election and decided not to give power, so the people came out and began to beat down those who were opposed, and what i turned belarusian ukraine into, so you yourself are in a concentration camp, this led him to sanctions, which in turn increased i will take advantage of his dependence on russia from that moment on. his survival is political, but it depends on russia, and that is why it is very difficult for me to imagine some things about alexander lukashenko that you have that would have contributed to a very, very important for vladimir putin , the issue of war is definitely the most important

what is it possible to worry about vladimir putin now, as alexander lukashenko was asked to act on such a request , he said no, eh, just say, it would pass the shit hole you i understood correctly that contacts at the level of diplomats and law enforcement agencies between ukraine and belarus are maintained, but how high is it, let's say it like that , it seems to me like the camps, try to work with the lukashenko regime, good svitlana tsykanovska i democratically outside of belarus, she still does not affects the politics inside the country, but you said that the contacts are kept at what level , how high are these levels, where are they kept. detailed information about the one who is on this line, but these are people who work in the power structures, so special refuse if people are not one no person about contact and zelensky and lukashenko now it’s simple and i don’t know the plague then we’ll find out about it, but how much i know it’s not

healthy health, thank you very much for your comment, pavlo slyunkin , analyst of the european council on international relations, we talked about the situation in belarus , thank you very much, thank you, glory to ukraine , glory to the heroes, the russian military decided en masse to use aviation in the war in ukraine, the edition of your story writes about this with reference to a source close to the ministry of defense of the russian federation. previously, that is, aviation was protected . it almost did not fly into the zone of operation of ukrainian air defense. well, now they have decided to change tactics. has significant advantages in the sky over ukraine , earlier i will remind you that the financial times, citing western intelligence data, reported that russia was withdrawing its military aircraft to the borders of ukraine nato interlocutors with whom the journalists talked said that russia is preparing an air campaign in which about 80% of its military aircraft are involved and will try to disable

the air defense of ukraine, according to the ministry of defense of great britain, at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, russia lost 130 military aircraft in ukraine, and as of february 2023 the ministry of defense of russia still has one and a half thousand aircraft with crews, it was announced today in a review of british intelligence, it was announced that the head of the center for military legal research oleksandr will join the broadcast oleksandra musienko. my congratulations. western and russian media, equally independent, are writing about the fact that russia has now decided to change its tactics and massively use the aviation that previously protected it. what does this mean , what is it for, what does this mean for you? we had an experience a year ago, when russia also prepared and increased its presence at military airfields several times, and by the way, my colleagues and i joined the journalistic investigation at the time, which

radio svoboda was doing and publishing the large political airfields where russian aviation was concentrated now is approximately the same picture. these are the same airfields with the exception of belarus there and it was somewhat less concentrated than before the full-scale invasion a year ago, but the situation is similar. but if we look at what happened and what they are saying now, they are saying that russia did not use it before in the depths of ukrainian territory, in fact it used it . it was the first days of a full-scale invasion and somewhere actively the first decade of march russia carried out about 140 sorties deep into ukrainian territory with the help of its aviation and on i tried to deliver about 100 precision missile strikes exclusively on the air defense facilities of ukraine with a military airfield or places where they thought ukrainian aviation could be concentrated

, that is, according to the plan of our enemy, they established almost all objects with the help of their intelligence coordination unfortunately with the help of traitors where there are in some cases from our side who helped and large coordinates and highlighted targets now tried to destroy it, but then they missed this opportunity and the opportunity that they had, let's say then, what they were able to achieve then was much more likely than now. missiles plus the planes themselves, but faced the enemy faced two problems, firstly, ukraine dispersed its positions and in some cases , the russian aviation simply hit

the airfield or empty places in fact where there was nothing else, but ukraine began to actively use manpads, which the ukrainian military had, starting with the soviet arrow and ending with the stings given to us by the united states. how it was even on the internet on youtube, you can see how it was in chernihiv when russian anti-aircraft planes were shot down as it was in other places, why with manpads, because for bombardment, the planes lowered, entered the targets, they became available in principle, especially the su-25 or su-24 , even other su-34s, even the su-30 today ukraine is in a better position than it was a year ago in the sense of air defense because we got manpads, i won't say a lot more, and secondly, different types. to prepare accordingly, thirdly, we continue

to work on strengthening our anti-aircraft defense system, and even during rammstein this week, this topic was also touched upon, a positive decision for us about the transfer of the same systems from france to italy and the transfer literally in march, additional batteries will be installed in germany and so on, that is, this process of strengthening the ukrainian sky continues, therefore, from my point of view , a military campaign from the air can really be activated, this is true, but in such a way that most likely russian aircraft will not fly deep into the territory of ukraine, it will be used actively or on approaches to the borders with ukraine, i.e. launching from the airspace of russia but close to the state border with ukraine with such missiles as 59 or k22 in

the amount they have, and more actively they will use their aviation for bombardment and strikes where they do not stop actively using it in places of active introduction of hostilities, that is, in the east on those fronts on the front line where hostilities are held i read some kind of new bombings or what was seen in the photos, but there are photos from the second world war. i think that all this will not happen. and i plan to disable the ukrainian air defense in the same way massively, well, again because of this, we have already been through similar things. in other words, this is really nothing new here, they tried to do it a year ago, and in principle, thanks to the fact that we obviously had certain information, we managed to save our

planes and save our means, although this is a unique case that is already in our western partners are also studying the principles. in fact, how did ukraine manage to do this, because all the forecasts were reduced to the fact that, most likely , russia will need to be there from several days to several weeks, or in order to obtain the complete dominance of its aviation by air the space of ukraine, that is, the chances were given to the ukrainian anti-aircraft defense quite a bit, but it withstood and stands the road accident and in today's conditions, considering that our position is better and stronger than it was a year ago, i do not think that russia used similar tactics as they did a year ago, they are getting some qualitatively better, greater result, i understood you and let me talk more about belarus, we touched on this topic with the diplomat today, but tomorrow lukashenko is meeting again in belarus with putin, and at the moment

it is not known why exactly, but i want you to ask to compare the amount of equipment that is currently concentrated on the territory of belarus, to compare it, what it is now in february 2023 and how much there was in february 2022 , these are comparable figures. near our borders and in general it is about 30 percent of the number that was at the time of the full-scale invasion whose preparation for the preparation for the full-scale invasion of in the month of february, there was much more equipment, the equipment itself, then there was a large number of tanks, armored vehicles, now there is not such a number , there was recorded the restoration of the first tank army, i.e. the first

tank army. and were preparing on the territory of belarus, and there were in principle thoughts and risks that this army was preparing for an invasion from the belarusian direction, but most of these tanks now went to the occupied part of luhansk region and are preparing or are already engaged in offensive offensive actions there in the area of ​​kreminnaya on the limansky direction and so on , that is, today there is no such surge of military activity as there was a year ago in belarus, but it must be understood that there are still troops in reserve on the territory of russia. it is not yet introduced absolutely 100% of all those prepared, there is still a certain number excluded that they may appear in belarus but this is not such a large number of troops and even if our enemy resorts to repeated attacks of some kind, then again, as in the case of

of air defense aviation, our positions there are now much stronger and stronger than they were a year ago, but if ukraine has any provocations, it will definitely respond, well, that is, it is about what is possible, there is such an option, we can consider that there may also be waiting for some reason to make some kind of provocation from the belarusian border, and that is why i have a question for you . we can often hear from the ukrainian authorities today that rockets were fired or fighter jets took off on the territory of belarus, and this is articulated but we do not hear about ukraine destroying any military targets on the territory of belarus well, you know.

they are still present in us, so you see, that is, er , it was probably logical to hand over the relevant notes first, to break diplomatic relations, so that it was obviously correct after that er, after that in belarusian in fact, it did not give its territories, but it is an accomplice to the aggression against ukraine, because i want to remind you that pay attention as soon as the topic of shaheds came up, that iran is transferring them to us immediately in the minister of foreign affairs appealed to the president to the government with a proposal to break diplomatic ties relations, the situation is difficult with iran. and the fact that belarus transfers its tanks from russia's storage and artillery warehouses and helps russia, not with its troops, not directly with its participation in the war, but indirectly is enough it seriously helps, so perhaps this should have been started and then called on belarus to warn that in the event that they contribute to the further support of this aggression

, ukraine will take certain measures aimed at self-defense, based on the norms of the un charter , and it was necessary to explain this to our partners at that time logically, therefore, there should be a clear sequence, it is clear to me , let's say, some things are unclear to this day, on the one hand, we do not recognize lukashenka , yes, we consider him to have been declared , we condemn belarus, on the other hand, so-and-so the position is not completely clear to us, we are preparing the border, what we need to do, we are strengthening it. this is obvious , and on the other hand, we still maintain certain diplomatic relations, and this has been going on for almost a year. that is, it will be illogical, of course, then it looks like it already looks from our side that we initiate, we carry out, that is , the sequence must still be observed, it is not so difficult to do well , actually, it is not some extraordinary things