[000:00:00;00] it is impunity to mobilize an infinite number of his personnel, his people, who can give him this war indefinitely, and this can be limited only by the economic indicators of russia, which will end even when all the weapons that he has to date , this infantry in novaya i we should wait for putin's military defeat in this format, which is what they are doing . at the end of september, they mobilized a large number of people there, more than three hundred thousand. they started preparing the other half, now they continue to mobilize and you near me will be mobilized

now they will not train them very much, they will dress them there minimally , they will give them a kalashnikov assault rifle, a sapper ’s shovel, er, a duffel bag of the 1876 model from the wheels, directly to the front, behind them will be the second the wave and the third wave - these are those who have already prepared these are the combat statutes of the red army infantry of the 1940s, this is what will actually happen, this is what we are now watching at the front when they push and push almost in a bayonet attack, they fall nearby. their friends do not help them, they go on, if you are not one group, they act as prescribed by the combat statutes, according to which their generals learned, as it is written by means of increasing efforts, that is, what we actually saw in residents of chernobyl and in other such cities, that is, they are, mr. mykhailo, maybe you, uh, as an expert in military counterintelligence, maybe you

have some friends there, military counterintelligence among themselves, these russian soldiers , so-called, they say, at least at the level of discussion, that we are cannon fodder in our country just well we will all die. well, you just know. well, this is a strange story. well, let him sit even for 10 years, but he will be alive, and they die and die and die and die and die and die. a picture when someone says don't just complain and say, well, listen , well, we, well, there's no point in dying well, there's no point in dying, how are we dying , any possible movements there inside the russian army, mykola, and there's no common sense there

, there's simply no people there in principle they were kept there for many years under the influence of such kind russian propaganda there is no mass media there are mass media, so they are more afraid of being killed by the armed forces of ukraine and actually even being commanded. in the combat statute, it is the same precisely because it must act as it is written , in no other way, because otherwise they are engaged in the military prosecutor's office, that's the point, they do not change the management system, they act as provided because if even a bunch of soldiers die, then he will have nothing for it, because he is as it is written in the combat statute.

and here is this formalism according to this hierarchical system, that of the 40th system. well, actually, they are afraid and that is why they act like this . they did it wrong. just as their predecessors did, because the technical equipment of the army is the same, the people are the same, the subordinates are the same, the combat statutes and regulations are the same , it is impossible to assume command or take responsibility and change something in the management system of russia, because it would be a violation hierarchical system of construction from this society is short. well, that's why they act like that, i said to mr. roman svitanok . i apologize, phala. and now the question is correct. they also write to vitaliy and me when we answer the question, well, the russians can

come to their senses now, change some strategy , tactics, something. well, they have been fighting for a year, they already see how the ukrainians fight, they already see me, they can find mistakes in our the defense should do something. that is to say, this is all a delusion and there is no such chance. you cannot retrain the russian general so that he becomes someone else and commands correctly in a different way. i agree with mr. mykhailo many stubborn stubbornness on the whole head, that is, the hardened old soviet system that does not really follow scott is being led to the slaughter. here they will be like that and a thousand with such stubborn eyes, and in the headquarters

of the general’s russian headquarters there are only weaklings, that is, they also operate according to certain schemes, these schemes do not change in the name of they need to be changed. the point is that they have them er, everything is involved in the quantity, the quantity in itself , the quality has become nothing, so i’m saying nothing, because they clearly focus on the quantity, that is, they don’t need it, but it’s the newest systems, and i need the systems it may not even be entirely in the prosecutors' hands, but simply in the effectiveness of certain of these systems, that is, they perfectly understand that where 100,000 have not passed, a million must pass, and they will have the task of collecting a million million. it will not pass. 10 million must pass, and they are the organization is registered with them the psychomatrix is ​​prescribed for the performance of any task in quantity later they will ask for it at least to do so

one more important question now again to mr. roman again this question look a-a noticed a huge number of military vehicles and armored vehicles of the united states in germany 400 of them were counted, i don't know if it could be a big military secret, but i will turn to mr. roman anyway, but they say that rammstein is now tanks and bmps, and so on. and so on, they forgot about the planes. okay, let's wait a couple of months, but this armored fist is looming, mr. roman, it is already somewhere, somewhere we can imagine it, this armored fist, i do not ask where i will place it , i am lazy and where it will hit this fist, but once he said, we remember in september

, do not give god, it’s such a month, what do we need there, 100 of something, 200 of something, 300 of something, 400 of something, and so on and so on and so on, and then it seemed absolutely not profitable there. where can i get 300 tanks there or 200 tanks there, now we can already imagine that that day will come when will the appetites of the wretched person be completely, if the americans , europeans, and if they would fill their appetites, the movement is definitely already there , if it was not our partners will see the end, that is, we will have a certain amount of force to carry out one, two, or at least strategic tasks, about which he drew his time as a chief, leave well, i will go to the azov

coast behind the clean crimea together with kherson oblast, er, we will liberate, er, the zaporozhye kherson region, the crimean oblast, we will free it, that is, at least, that is your task, er , there will be technology, at least now we can see aviation movements, i agree with you, we need to postpone this topic a little longer, eh- most likely , they are political, including the problems for making such decisions. god will not put them. they will give at least long-range missiles in order to fulfill the task of clearing the crimea. we have it, but we just don't we lacked a certain amount of armor, we lacked a few hundred tanks, they gave us a little more than we asked for, we lacked a few hundred, and they gave us more than 1,000 armored vehicles. that is, i would say they overfilled the plan to the menu, just now i see two two extras here there are two strategic tasks that can be performed with the help of this

bronykov, and i think we will see it in the month of march , that is, at the end of february at the beginning of march. pole boek, mr. mykhailo ah, the last questions are probably for you. although it would have been organic to mr. roman, because it’s about airplanes, but that’s how it happened . so when we say that there is some friction in the supply of airplanes, translating it into normal language, the west simply does not want ukrainian the army bombed sevastopol or bombed the crimean bridge, well, what, why not give it? well, when i talk to specialists, they say that somewhere one normal western f-16 is worth five e-e flashed, that is, it's just, well, obvious in ukraine ukraine will have

an advantage at the front, it's obvious and simple europeans, american well, listen, you right now how will you hold this toy, how will it fly, because the whole of sevastopol and the crimean bridge are leading, it’s not wrong they say and what do you say? in the kremlin, who is actually the initiator of this, and this will be our victory, and not before they give planes , for example, one plane, business structures , disarmament of insignificant crews, without maintenance, and so on, there is nothing wrong, that is, it is certain that all this is being prepared and the decision on the transfer of the planes has most likely already been made, but it is not a quick matter and it probably won’t be today. another question is that the phase of the war is now underway when it is necessary to destroy a large group of russia. i hope this will be

putin’s last fight because he no longer has there will be resources, and then you can go clear the territory from the rest of the russian army, this battle, as we can see, has already begun, the battle has begun, and the russians are gradually testing our defense, how is it going? to be disposed of, but they are afraid, that's why, first, the disposal of the russian army, then, uh, it's just that the front will sprinkle it, you just run it, then we will also need armored vehicles and aviation to finish off this army and drive it further. of the number of infantry of the russian army, we see that ours thank you mr. mykhailo excuse me mr. mykhailo prytula military expert colonel of the sbu express military counterintelligence and mr. roman

svitan military expert colonel of the reserve of the armed forces military trapper instructor thank you very much, gentlemen, for being with us. thank you very much, and let's move on to diplomacy. ivan klympush-tentsadze, we have a people's deputy head of the committee on the integration of ukraine into the eu. congratulations, mrs. ivano-frankivsk. well , the munich conference is always a reference to putin's speech at the munich conference , you understand. the question is, if they had noticed this speech then, then now they did not have to deal with such facial expressions . putin's speech in 2007 found an understanding of his real intentions even then and uh before it were treated with appropriate attention and understood that these intentions are er real that his pain is so-called for the collapse of the soviet union as the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th

century er that it can result in such wars of aggression, one of which he is currently waging on the ground of ukraine because there have already been previous wars on the territory of georgia , including our war, which is already in its ninth year, which means that the ninth year of this war is coming to an end, so you know, we now communicate a lot with our international partners and i constantly emphasize to them that it is of course very good that there is a recognition at the moment uh that concerns the fact that they say we need to listen to the baltic countries to poland to those countries and ukraine respectively but those countries are inside the north atlantic alliance and the european of the union and who warned about russia's intentions, but it seems to me that we, as a free

world, are still one step behind this response that we all jointly provide in the face of russian aggression, and in ukraine, we also need to switch to that saber when we would act they were not actively afraid of escalation, because russia will escalate, it will escalate as long as it is allowed to do so, and therefore our task is that our voice today was heard in such a way that could convince the world that help which ukraine needs now. it must be increased, it must be accelerated , and it must contribute as much as possible to er, hmm , prevent any attacks by russia on any country in the world, obviously starting with ukraine , ms. ivane, look, macron said

this today well, something mysterious what needs to be helped ukraine, and i translated it myself from diplomatic to presidential language to normal language, what to think about russia, about the future, about security guarantees for the world, it is not the right time to win the war, it is necessary for the ukrainians to win the war against the russians, and when that happens, thank god, then europe , macron and the sholts are all on the world will sit somewhere and say and now let's decide what to do with russia, how to deprive it of nuclear weapons, how to throw out ion from the security council, if necessary, how to de-nationalize it, over-classify it, where to make a trial, how will the trials be, will they will they be only in gas or also here and there because we know that nurberg was not only nurberg, just nurwerk was so bright and

only hitler's superiors got there and so there were trials all over germany , this is not only in germany, that is, i understood correctly that but until the victory , the western world at the level of politicians will not discuss the future of russia, how it should look after its defeat, god forbid, knocks on wood of the need to discuss, think , predict, calculate with which russia we will have to deal with after her defeat in this war and uh, this is another uh message, another call well, which i repeatedly uh voiced to our partners that their and intelligence services, their analytical centers

, their uh just eyes intellectual abilities should be additionally aimed precisely at not being afraid to analyze and not being afraid to predict and predict and calculate what are the possible scenarios of what the russian federation will be like today at the political level understanding that it can be different russia, even from the point of view of the borders in russia or the states that will appear on the territory of this russia, which will lose this war, and today there is no readiness to accept such a possibility as reality, and this is unfortunately er ... i remember the situation when george bush sr. came to ukraine a few weeks before the ukrainian parliament announced the independence of ukraine at the time and

, addressing the ukrainians, clearly said that the united states of america would not support any manifestation of there efforts to gain the independence of ukrainians, and then i had to not just put up with this reality, but urgently ensure it as it will continue to develop, and therefore i would like this mistake not to be repeated today. but at the same time, you mentioned macron in one part of it speech but at the same time he also spoke about the ever -increasing need to review the structure of international or even a single global organization such as the united nations and in particular of the security council of the united nations due to the fact that one of the countries

that is called, that is there with the right of veto as a permanent member of the un security council and is called to protect the united nations charter, exactly opposes this charter and definitely violates it, moreover , it uses its function and its presence in the security council and, well, in order to actually destroy the world order that was created after the second world war, and in my opinion, this indicates that there is a growing awareness that today's international structures that we have are not are able to adequately respond to the challenges that russia is unfortunately causing in this world, along with this there is a simple situation related to the fact that we in the west hear all the time that the west is not a party to the conflict, that we must do everything possible so that the conflict spreads to countries

members of nato, but today the president said that the united states is ready to defend the countries of the baltics that they are ready to increase the military presence there means something this is what the category of nato is a territory of protection is something else we are helping ukraine we are not in conflict with russia and until from what time this generator can be leading in general, this is also a big question, well, this is a certain part of it, if you want just a hint , ah, probably because the russian federation made a decision for itself a long time ago that this is a hygienic war not purely against ukraine, but against the free world against of rules against e-e international law against civilization e allegedly with the proposal of their chaotic e-e chaotic such civilization of the russian world that they carry e-e as a hooligan worldwide international

hooligan in a-a in international law therefore e-e i i think that this and these approaches of the free world, including the countries and members of the north atlantic alliance and more broadly, let's just say the countries of the west that associate themselves with western values, they will force them to move to the realization and acceptance of it is de-facto that er-er they will be a part of this conflict er-er even de-jure if you want not just in fact how it is happening today , another question is of great interest to me personally and maybe not everyone is interested, i don't know but there were some contacts of mrs. ivanna between the ukrainian official delegation and the delegation of good russians, there is no official russian delegation there and they simply did not invite, but they invited

the opposition, as it were, but the latest events there in various fields tell me that even the russian opposition thinks that the main goal is to return on february 23, but nothing happened, there were no victims there was no war, there was no mariupol , no matter what. well, this is a bad boy. putin did everything, and russia is good, and we will only remove putin with the leader coming to the kremlin . everything will be fine. this moment is very interesting to me. how much do they think of the russian opposition? did you have any contacts? did you hear their reports? it's just interesting to me . i don't know if there were any official contacts between the ukrainian delegation and

the delegation. different parts of the so-called russian opposition, i will say for my part. i am very skeptical about the importance of the russian opposition in russia and i do not think that it is any serious force or a serious power. i think that it is absolutely marginal. some things which, unfortunately, have absolutely no real representation in the russian federation, moreover, if you and i carefully follow the large number of statements of such well-known oppositionists, and like the same mr. navalny, we know that he is no different from today's kremlin leadership from the point of view of their russian chauvinism

. therefore, in my opinion, today we cannot talk about the fact that there are any representatives of the russian federation who really have a different type of thinking and the ability and support in the russian federation, which would give the opportunity to count on the fact that they will somehow influence the situation inside this country. to what extent can we, in principle, now talk about the fact that there is a red line over which the nato member countries will not cross in helping ukraine. they fear, let's say, a nuclear response from russia and why this i'm asking. we hear from victoria that ukraine can legitimately hit targets in crimea. it's logical, but we immediately hear from moscow that crimea is the same

territory as the bryansk region. well, if he really believes that it is possible to strike in crimea and that it will not cause any nuclear attack, then he knows something . so then it is possible to strike, no. you just don’t know, you can just look at it with your own eyes, uh, it’s the same as striking in moscow and if it is possible to strike in crimea, then why can't we strike at the brains, why, what is the logic, that is, either we do not strike in this territory, which the russians consider their own, or we embrace the entire territory that is written in the russian constitution, how is it possible to create two different regimes here when in heads christians themselves do not have these two different security regimes, we have them. let's just try to understand the logic of our partners and the logic of our partners is as follows: they have not been recognized by any country in the western world. actually, practically no country in the world has recognized crimea.

-a part of the russian federation, respectively, they perceive crimea as a part of a-a legitimate ukrainian territory that is illegally annexed or captured by russia, occupied by russia , by russia, by ukraine as an aggressor, and therefore , in fact, i would believe that it is even a certain this is a step forward because even a few months ago we did not hear such statements from our partners that their weapons can be used to squeeze russia out of the occupied territories. therefore, this is already a step forward regarding the use of western weapons against targets on the territory that is a legitimate internationally recognized territory of russia, at the moment they do not agree to this yet. but again, i do not rule out that the situation may change in the future, this is

the first thing about the use of western weapons and secondly, i also believe that we ukrainians a-a we have to do everything dependent on us and independent in order to have our own types of weapons with which we can reach the goals on the territory of the russian federation, without this we will not even have military goals, i emphasize military objectives on the territory of the russian federation and without it it will be difficult for us to win in this line ms. ivanovych one more question maybe even the last one but it's so simple eh i don't remember is it medvedchuk or someone else this one this one plan b two ukraines so how north south korea means something part of it remains for russia and it is developing there in an appropriate way, but i wonder if someone in the west takes it seriously

, or at the munich conference, someone on the sidelines may be sitting over a beer or coffee and saying , oh , that’s a good idea. let’s try to persuade the ukrainians for two ukraines. is it like wishful thinking, as usual medvedchuk publishes well, we have to understand that there will always be either analysts or politicians who will grasp at the possibility of a scenario to whom it seems that such a scenario exists potentially um it's even possible there from adults a-a well, but it just needs additional explanatory work if you want a work that would explain that even in the same north south korea and for no uh-uh well, for north korea conditionally there is no uh- is it a great russia or a great korea, which

will always try to influence south korea and so on, so i believe that we will be able to break such proposals, which are completely absurd, if you want, and which have nothing to do with the possible solution of fate world, because i actually believe that it is not just a-a the question is how ukraine will get out of this war. and the results of this war, in my opinion, will have serious consequences for geopolitical and geopolitical stability, for the security of both the european continent and, in general, for the international world system . integration of ukraine