[000:00:00;00] first it is conquered by what you i tell you as you like from the territory that is already temporarily occupied about this it has no relevance to reality at all we are just asking how they see or i tell you how can you not see what this means, this is the corridor - this is the first zone the second zone zone zone of kim jong honey, then the zone of the nazi regime and then the zone of polish occupation, this will never happen, i 'm not saying that it will happen, they don't just have meetings, then money. you understand what viktor medvedchuk can now say to volodymyr for putin , they are already creating the government of the second ukraine and the parliament of the second ukraine and the national bank of the second country. our hryvnia is a good hryvnia for our hryvnia.

it should be on e-e 10 hryvnias for 2 hryvnias it will be beautiful and medvedchuk will be on the coins because he is the same so and but it also needs to be guaranteed by gold in our national bank, so please let the national bank of the central bank of russia allocate gold to us to maintain the stability of our well good hryvnias so that we will then mean when we come to , i don't know, the capital of our second ukraine, we could immediately pay salaries to people there if you fight there more than twice we will even call this currency the ruble so we already need money and we still need money for we still need a beautiful military uniform for the army of the second ukraine. and we still need money for the television of the second ukraine, which we will do. we still need money for the show. oksana, because she already wants to host, she already wants to prepare, but this one has talent

, a ballerina has talents, she wants 30 wigs a beautiful sable fur coat and i need a t-shirt with your image, 100 pieces at a price of $10,000, no, 10,000 new ukrainian rubles, and one ukrainian ruble is equal to 50 us cents, so we have to buy these t-shirts from yudashkin, he is not yet alive i know, i don't know either. well, in any case, he has a beautiful neck, so it will be here . so, these are the straziks, your eyes will be diamond-like, and your belly will be. so, with such a beautiful five-carat diamond, which oksana has already seen in a jewelry store on the tabletop lane and we already want it now it's a blonde to drink, so it must be used in this beautiful t-shirt, on which i will speak at rallies in the second ukraine in july, because it will be hot there, it's a cock to appeal to erdogan because he has already released medvedchuk, so you can get in handkerchiefs

a maybe you need some kind of beautiful dress to go somewhere zambita option or you can buy a textile factory in china to sew oksana dresses, these are the best well, listen and as much as possible well, you see, we are already alone with you in this world, she and we already have mine somewhere for 2 -3 billion of ukrainian rubles of the new second ukraine expenses expenses were collected well, barely why don't you create it for us, we will already create airships, there should be an airline, airships are beautiful, one will be called medvedchuk, he will also be called putin, well, that is, the plans of the citizens, well, that's all for you a as for how we should liberate the territory , we just need to liberate the territory

, only the vasco-stut are within our borders, there are no other ways. you have not seen at the moment. has actually changed by 360°. i think his consciousness has turned over and now he repeated on international platforms and in an interview with the bbc that there will be no peace, that it is impossible to talk with the russian federation , especially in putin's face, and the question is not about compromises, as he said in bbc interview and that's the point. with whom to reach this compromise ? we don't trust putin, so we won't talk to him. but manuel macron, the french president, says that the change of power in russia will not change anything. this regime does not need to be changed. we need to convince people like macron, i think that macron is absolutely right because the issue is not a change of power in russia, because we will live all the time with russian domestic political changes, we can hope that if there is no putin there will be no war and if there is, if we will wait putin will be president for another 10 years, and then he will be 80

years old, the president will resign , he will resign, say well, well, not medved, but someone else and there will be no war. and it will be with the next president. i think that before that, then it is necessary to approach just as i want to approach this as macron, we need security guarantees, such security guarantees so that war could never come from russian land to ukrainian land, this is a member of the party and macron is already saying that no negotiations are needed , even if he is a human being, he can see it what a constant waste tried to support the whole, i said that they all these young people have exhausted their way, you know the negotiations , zelenskyi i think sincerely wanted to come to an agreement with putin, he believed that there was a political toolkit for agreements, eh, maybe not was very aware of putin's goals and hoped that if he started talking about offering something, then the russian side would also talk about offering something. well, they just have him, first

of all, they wiped his feet and his desires , and secondly, they began to insult him personally, which is wildness in general well, they are now behaving exactly like this with my sandu, they have already switched to individuals, secondly, they were obviously going to kill him for the third time, i give if it is already the third to the fourth time, i think that they are going to now, so there is always a question of what could be negotiations i think that putin will bring nothing with him to any negotiations with zelensky, or some other poison, he inserted a glass of wine, you know why don't you drink tea, asking lukashenko from some journalists who came to him , this is not tea for you, you yourself drink tea yourself aleksandry, go tea, this is for you by the way, lukashenko looked like and i'm curious. when he came to putin , putin thanked him for

the meeting. bullying yes, this is a form of bullying thank you for coming and what and how and i could refuse and if i could, i wouldn't go to you, someone needs this kind of phrase, you know, it looks like a victim with a dictator , you are talking about the situation, speaking with a victim of pressure you understand, it's not my fault, he came himself, it's not really interesting, because lukashenko likes to position himself as a strong leader. well, he's a strong leader in belarus. when it comes to putin, is he alone for himself? he didn't position himself that way, you know, and there are such people who are a typical type, you know, a family rapist who beats his wife , children, abuses them, comes to write out, or is it vodka, i will drink them all here, then it means

that he wakes up at nine o'clock in the morning, he poured out that he was already late for 3 hours to work. he runs and stands in front of the boss. how will i do it ? i will do everything . surprised, and by the way, he is not putin answers and remembers, as a rule, a person who comes to the secretary of the port com and you say well thank you thank you sasha что зашёл лога i could not come alone how did they free him well that's all and why is lukashenko going to the seat i think he's a sisin-pin, after all, such an e- is a strong leader , an important geopolitical player

. well, who is lukashenko? which countries he can resist in europe , you know, i will say more, there are almost none, and those hrinniks do not yet obey the standards of the european union, this is possible through hungary , but hungary is just part of the european union, and belarusians, therefore, you can play various games there, and these calls may be concerned that this transit window is closing because every day the countries of the european union are closing more and more crossings from belarus and it is absolutely not in the interests of such energy, so in beijing they may think that by and large uh, we need to talk with lukashenko about his future intentions, what he is going to do next regarding the economic situation, how to get out

of the situation, or is it possible for both of us to come between the drops. i think that this zelpin is basically not interested in belarus remaining a bridgehead for russian aggression, he is interested in so that the aggression itself continues, but in such a way that it exhausts us and the west. yes, but he is not interested in the fact that belarus was an element of this aggression, the question here is to what extent it can be influenced. but of course he is about it will talk to lukasz and lukashenka. it is clear why he is needed because independent relations with this benefits that i can come myself, this is also the sovereignty of lukashenka there was always such an attempt to maneuver between the west and russia even after he turned out to be involved in the whole a number of belarusian partisan politicians will disappear by and large lukashenka has been a long time since the 1990s, a serial killer has been a political but nevertheless, he tried to talk with europe in the end, in the period of 14-15

years there, he was a real triumph if before an angel merkelsoul came to minsk, he could not dream about it, the ambassadors began to return as he was expelled back in the 90s, before he began to take away their residences because he wanted to live there on his own like bari, and even when he landed the plane, you remember to arrest him journalist protasevich, so then they thought how to transfer this whole process from minsk, but they still couldn't because everything was tied to minsk, that is, he was so desirable and relevant. he was because of the coronavirus, so in this regard, he has such there is no such possibility of maneuver left, the west does not want to see it, but there is china and china is objectively interested in several things

, the first is the weakening of the west, but the second is that russia does not become stronger as a result so that it can dictate its conditions to the civilized world and china itself so that they suffered economic losses, and china, in principle , is objectively interested in the fact that the former soviet republic, which is not oriented towards the west in important conditions , retained its sovereignty but was oriented towards china, that is, ukraine russia can take away the question is because it is about the west. but belarus is kazakhstan , but you can’t touch on that either. if putin wants to turn belarus into a bridgehead for an attack on ukraine , sidzempin may want to leave belarus

as an agent of his own influence in europe, just like that and that’s why. if lukashenko made another statement , it is interesting. he invited joseph biden to minsk, they say . why are you going to poland, better come to minsk, let's talk here in three java and putin about the end of the war in ukraine, what is this statement again in the room me and lenin photos on the white wall here doroshenko can also hang this photo of biden putin the names of the patriots on the photos became in that paradigm he can also take his photo football players and talk to them it will be his dream so i think that it's just not to a certain extent it's not two things probably it's an inadequate listener because if you imagine that biden will talk to putin and putin is ready to talk to his father they are ready to talk to each other and why are you here the last person they are here

what is needed in this configuration is lukashenko, who is lukashenko, where is this lukash, where is lukashenko, there is no lukashenko, and here is lukashenko, lukashenko, let's get out, but the point is that at the same time, lukashenko can be used as such a beacon that moscow wants to talk behind america, but i don't really believe in these serious namibs, well, again, notice that this signal we will talk with biden, but in this configuration, lukashenko is also strange. in this configuration, we are two aggressors, but there is no zelensky. we want to talk about aggression against ukraine by the bidens we invite zelenskyi to not invite him if putin is talking to biden well, fine, but if putin is ready to talk to lukashenka, then it is obvious that zelensky should

also be close to biden. no, lukashenko. what are they trying to say, you know, zelenskyi is useless, you see, they are fighting with countries in different directions, the ukrainian leadership will do as the biker says, they are just puppets, and lukashenko is not such a puppet, he is independent at all the figure simply simply unbelievably simply the level of freedom directly proportional to the level of stupidity ridiculous another important visit was this week to kyiv elikon a high-ranking official from israel came and this is the first time during the full-scale invasion when a representative of israel came to ukraine and there were important statements regarding humanitarian aid for 200 million dollars, if i'm not mistaken , the aid package and also, er, there will be a certain medical program that will be developed. we have some

hospitals and training personnel here, but there is still no mention of military aid, although on at the beginning of february, teniaku still hinted to me, let's say what this could be about and they are thinking about it near the mine and there will be no further thinking about it, i am not even surprised that he can make certain decisions because why there were no these visits because first the previous government of israel was first in a crisis, then it was preparing for elections for the third time. he obviously did not believe that any improvement of the situation with the help of ukraine would somehow increase their property, political dividends, let's say, relations and the united states of america, the situation is different, he is alone

on the other hand , he is in a difficult relationship with the current administration, learning about his many years of acquaintance with president biden . not very good, because we will be blackmailed by moscow, then nick has a lot of crisis moments, both internal political and external political , now in general israel is in a deep crisis. that the new coalition wants to carry out judicial reform , there is a public uproar on this matter, by and large, he is acting, he is trying to act, he has not yet started fucking how painful jones is struggling, johnson, by and large , realized that his domestic political situation is very difficult, the situation with brexit is simply solid economic and social disaster or johnson was the engine of this breks and he became

prime minister essentially replaced terezumei to conduct the real brest as the supporters of this adventure saw him and he started fulfill your promises, and here the disaster has already become such that we saw that it eventually led to the collapse of the forest roads after two weeks, somewhere it seems like the prime minister, as i lobbied for the position of prime minister, johnson himself , minister sunak, is also not very good, the situation of the crisis continues if today there were elections in great britain, a conservative would be blown away with a crushing bill, and it must be said that this is what we had in kyiv, the leader of the labor party , astar, the mayor, it is very important, but we do not pay much attention to this visit, it is important business is perhaps the most important, much more important visit than the visit of the minister of foreign affairs to israel, because it indicates that the british opposition completely shares the approaches of the british government to the war, but even boris

can lead the country tomorrow and we need to build anew in relation to them , they will already be like that and this is already the second such visit of the leader of the opposition , the leader of the christian democratic union of germany came to us, honey, too, in an absolutely obvious order. when he intensifies the israeli policy position in relation to ukraine , it will help him in the dialogue with the state. warning that it is not necessary to go to such contacts and the previous minister of foreign affairs of israel went to sweat and did not talk to sergey lavrov since the attack, he never

came to kyiv even when he was a minister of foreign affairs and when he became acting prime minister, for example, he did not communicate with lavrov, and cohen, on the one hand, spoke with lavrov, on the other hand , he came to kyiv. and here is the question: what is better? i have a rather important big question, but this is typical politics, no, he always behaved like that, here we put a balance here, we talk here, we immediately play back, we show that we will never fully support anyone, that we will maintain all contacts, we, so what you were good combination of chess game difficult combination of chess game when a person feels like the leader of a small country while

when he is the leader of a small country he is not in terms of his military power not a small country not small but from that moment and technologies and technologies 100 i would say that the appearance of the russian troops in kyiv in syria coincided with the provincialization of the israeli political elite during the era of no and mecha because all the previous leaders of israel considered themselves provincial from david ben-gurion to i would say to ariel sharon that they are provincials, they thought i saw in moscow in moscow what is possible during visits, i see how they behaved , well, they agreed, so they are the president of the united states, that is, they did not have this

that they should be afraid of although in the end they were politicians of the times when there was a soviet union that was ready to fight for the destruction of israel, but here came to power an elite that already gave let's say so a country that has already won back and it's scary if i suddenly appear such a serious investment threat, it's scary and this it must be restrained until and when i tell the israelis that you do not understand that you cannot offend putin. putin is not offended, he is just drawing up a plan, if you become part of his plan, you will offend him , you will not, he will do something there from the territory of syria , and he will come up with an excuse, you will not you can give him a salute because he is acting absolutely right under invented ghosts why this is not part of israeli political thought is a huge mystery to me but i repeat again that the last two decades there in the history

of israeli politics this is the story of her relentless provincialization and that's the way it is. listen, i don't even think it's bad in the end. it's a small country the size of a ukrainian region, it's not that big of a population, it should have happened once. well, in principle, the people who created israel, where did they have in mind that he should be at the center of world politics , well, that is, there was no such idea, it was just an idea to create a state for the jews, since all the neighbors wanted to destroy it, then otaka arose. i would say a counterbalance. now that the main dangers have been overcome, the country is beginning to return to its real political borders and opportunities, and we still perceive it as if it was the byzantine empire, and so was my generation . by the way, i always consider israel to be such a superpower, and in the religious sense and in the sense

of the city council, you can drive there in two hours in three this is definitely not the united states. by the way, why exactly do we perceive great britain in this way, which is just an island a on the empire , but great britain has a large fleet, an army , nuclear weapons are legal, unlike israel , that is, it is clear that it relies on the influence of the commonwealth, the influence on american jewry it is not bad to restore the diaspora now, it is not bad for vitaliy, everything has been put on hold for us and the audience. and i would also like to discuss with you the scandalous former prime minister of italy and silvio brusconi, because he made such a resonant statement in his, in principle, style about our president volodymyr zelenskyi and his meeting with the current prime minister of italy he said that i would not meet with zelenskyi and

in general, zelenskyi is to blame for the attack on donbas and i will support the ukrainian one, but then he already wrote yes in his twitter account, not remembering instagram what no well, what about you, i will buy this ukraine, of course we are all on the side of ukraine. listen, eh . i think that the fact that bordosconi does not like zelensky is doing zelensky an honor. this is how they position themselves in life and in any case, any kind of love is known, his choice is generally known. loves putin sincerely and likes it putin's style of action should be loved. zelensky is not there, but this once again shows that all these people

have not changed. this is all the pro-russian european lobby in general in western politics. they are just waiting for their time. you and i understand perfectly what we are saying. these people took money for putin. bronzo scorini is not one of those people who took money from putin from the point of view of mafia, he himself is putin, only italian, billions of dollars, a huge career, after all, age, he could already calm down somehow, i don't mean you want from the political point of view activity but from the point from the point of view of supporting evil because at such an age a person should think about his biography about an article in the encyclopedia that also no he needs to serve and this is absolutely obvious and he still internally believes that putin cannot lose if he started to act and this is also a mistake i am very surprised

what happened to the school, a person who was brought up in the free world believes in the competence of people who were brought up in the kgb , this is also strange. so i am not exactly surprised by this, i think that george meloni, who was very unhappy that she was not invited to the meeting between macron and scholz-zelensky in paris, although mario draghi was obviously there, i am aware that the issue is not with her, but with the government she formed, if she wanted to be invited somewhere, she needed other coalition partners. no one doubts her right to lead the italian government, although her party has pronounced post-fascist roots, it is such a pro-russian force

, and this means more because if ms. meloni's independence from the point of view of her views on education over life, she may not have very realistic views, but they are hers. what about mr. berlusconi and mr. salvini have very big doubts about the independence of their foreign policy ideas, and this is a huge problem, and i suggest that you also move to georgia and understand what is happening there now , because the european parliament adopted a resolution calling on the georgian authorities, in particular, president zarobishvili, to pardon mykhailo saakashvili because he is ill and he cannot proper, let's say, medical assistance is provided and there is a threat to his life. however, this is not the first time such an appeal has been made to vitaliy, but the georgian authorities do not respond

. i think it is because they think that what is the point releasing mykhailo saakashvili from prison means showing weakness, and by the way. as far as i understand the president's logic , make a video. she says that even if she pardons him, there are still several criminal cases and he can be taken away again based on this sentence . so, according to the idea, she is all time turns to the authorities with an ideological opposition, and this is a constructive approach from the other side, so that they stop actions that in one way or another affect international prestige. he has ardent supporters and people who hate him, they are afraid of the fact that mykhailo saakashvili is attacking the international prestige of ukraine, but i do not see the georgian government even trying to solve this problem , because the georgian government believes that the role

it plays today when it on the one hand, he talks about his own western course, and on the other hand, he supports it. i would say, well, such special relations with moscow allow russians in, at least many do. i think that moscow does not really want georgia to let in those russians who are fleeing from mobilization, but here is the very idea of ​​resuming flights. the very idea of ​​economic cooperation and the absence of sanctions. this is much more important than letting in russians who do not want to serve in the russian army. but moscow may really like all this, and in principle, i think that if the west can come to belgrade and tell president oleksandr i teach that either you settle the situation around kosovo and it is a steel braid or you will get no chance to extend your candidate