[000:00:00;00] you know, i looked through this entire text after the speech, there is nothing to decipher, he did not say anything new, and the audience of this speech. there were two audiences, the first one was internal, and he told them again to his deep people that everything would be fine , how much money would be received, what sanctions we were strengthened that our economy actually grew as a result of sanctions and so on and so on that we will live better as his predecessor , more talented, more successful, and more fortunate joseph stalin said that he will live we will live better, we will live more cheerfully, putin is trying to say the same thing, but his reality is not nearly the same, in fact, it is as bad as in the state during industrialization , no one will live better, more cheerfully, because you cut

worse and mix it up, but ah, this is his speech i have a third audience , yes, the inner part is his own entourage, and paraphrasing another classic, vladimir lenin, and the soviet-russian one, who called on looting what was looted, putin today called on his entourage to loot what was not looted and not looted, that's it the main message and the war, the war will be one of the main screens for this, yes, the wheels behind which russia will continue to be calculated and embezzled, the only problem they have is that they now have money, especially there is no place to take it out, they are arresting everywhere, there is very little jurisdiction left china ob' union of the arab emirates and even there it is not completely clear whether it is possible to accumulate this money a-a and as for another important audience, it is

the global south and again he declares for the sake of global relief that uh, this is not fuel, we attacked the west, uh that we are not fighting with ukraine, we are also at war with the west. and that the main money allocated by the west is called sums, where did he get 160 billion dollars, that it is much more than taking care of the problems of poor countries, he also tells the global west about what it is now from ukraine, as in the 1930s, the west is sculpting the enemy of russia, re-equaling russia to nazi germany, which started the world war, and at the same time, what is putin's speech based on, and why am i saying that there is nothing new there? everything relies on

the falsification of history. and to silence the facts, nothing is said about the fact that the second world war did not start so much with the coming of the nazis to power, it was important , of course, but it began without uh, hmm , directly as a result of the speech between hitler and uh, stalin about partition poland and the soviet and german troops attacked poland at the same time and divided it, it was the beginning of the first and second world war. and there putin has a lot of such twists and turns , outright lies, falsification of history, it's all the same as what he told a year ago. well, none no new stories have appeared, but mr. peter, does the statement about putin about the actual suspension of their participation in the treaty on the reduction and limitation of strategic offensive weapons add any new colors, now we are talking about synod 3, this is the third treaty signed , if i am not mistaken, it was signed, it was a bearish one

and barakomo bama in prague in the 10th year, and literally in the 21st year, it was extended , it should have been in effect until 2026, according to your opinion, that this is more of a political statement or a real deployment of the future the development of the appropriate type of weapons in the russian federation. and you see this statement by putin. it can shock people who have not been following how opinions were formed in general, including the united states regarding this treaty, as in their books, in the book of their memoirs, john bolton , trump's advisor from issues of national security. he says that one of the first goals of the republican one was the withdrawal of the

united states from the treaty on strategic offensives weapons because this treaty, according to many important experts, there are two camps in america, so according to one camp, it does not give the united states the opportunity to really control the disarmament and reduction of these offensive weapons even then in 2000 2016-17 since the 18th years, then, uh, information was already being collected, considering that uh, russia is preparing such types of weapons, that is, those which, uh, in case of use, will have the same effect as ballistic missiles, but at the same time, america cannot how to control uh the way russia is arming, re-arming and increasing the threat to america and trying to bypass the american anti-missile defense systems, if this treaty does not guarantee the security of the united states, it is not needed and there was also a plan to withdraw from this treaty, that is what putin did, but he was ahead of the americans here

well, what’s up? here, he has overtaken the americans because a new democratic administration has come to power, and there is another. unfortunately, there is a camp that believes that russia still believes that it is possible to call it a broken number with camp workers. they consider other so-called experts and say it openly. imagine after the destruction of mariupol, which in principle is equal to the effect of the explosion of a nuclear bomb , so many people were destroyed. reduction of armaments well, putin spat in the face of these american experts by suspending this treaty and showing that well, he is trying to pretend that he is thus increasing this level of nuclear blackmail and

bringing the doomsday, that is, a global nuclear one, closer war in any case, mr. petreb, this is a sign that the russians are demonstrating readiness. yes, we understand that a demonstration of readiness and readiness are different things . medvedev and so on and so on and so on they constantly changed the public discourse well, actually, there is a virtual feeling so that the enemy will not, of course, use such weapons. yes, but he will push, but if we go back to an equally important story, in particular it is about the visit of the president of the united states joseph biden to kyiv, it is unclear why, for example, putin somehow bypassed and did not react to the visit of the president of the united states biden and what is happening now in eastern europe, in particular, it is

about the strengthening of the euro-atlantic of defense and security at all levels. i can say that he did not react, and the explanation for this is very simple, on the same day when biden visited ukraine , the russians wanted to do this again the newest tests. what did you call the sarma miracle missile, as they called it, that it is capable of serving the american anti -missile defense and it was unsuccessful. this is also why putin is silent. if it was successful , believe me, he would sing like a nightingale a, but uh test accordingly, all putin's bluff was discovered by the americans with this visit, and the nuclear bluff was discovered by them with this visit, because the leader is a person who is one of the two people, one of the two officials involved in the decision on

the use of nuclear weapons in the united states he was in a territory where the russians could obviously destroy him there , and the americans were warned that this should not be done, and thus exposed the russian nuclear bluff. i am on russia's terms, otherwise ukraine will be destroyed until baden said that it is russia that will be defeated, it is the russian army that will be destroyed, not ukraine, and therefore we will continue to support ukraine, why is the rocket not flying ? the bluff was exposed. well, why? is to comment in in the best traditions of soviet russian propaganda, we should just keep silent about this and tell old tales about the nazis , about how we want to be with nato and that we attacked because otherwise they attacked us, and so on and so on , but peter, uh, there is such an opinion that the russian federation

there is a regime there from the use and excessive play of muscles in the sense of nuclear weapons restrains the china factor in particular yes, nevertheless, we see that in relation to china directly, they are now using specific rhetoric, the world e leaders and politicians of the corresponding level of the state secretary anthony blinking of the united states warned the minister of foreign affairs of china that if the country supports the armed aggression of the russian federation, it will have serious consequences for interstate relations . one cannot help but recall ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyi, who remarked that we would like to have china's support, but at the moment it does not seem possible . if china supports arms and russia, it is not excluded that the third world war will start, how do you feel now how do you now see how much the chinese factor remains a deterrent for of the russian federation in the context of nuclear weapons, i do not think that china can perceive russia

in any case. and i do not believe that one nuclear state can have any serious influence over the nuclear state, if only for that reason, if only for chinese money the new president of russia and the leaders have been elected. only if the leaders are somehow directly dependent on other states politically and economically, china cannot influence another nuclear state . this is a very clear message, you see, in chinese -american relations, everything is far from cloudless, there are enough problems and linking, the american executive just tells china, but you just give us a reason to apply very strict economic restrictions to you and win from you from the american market and the american republicans promise that

chinese goods will be replaced by american goods, that there should be no chinese electronics, all electronics should be produced in the united states, they just they say, give only an excuse and providing russia with weapons is such a good excuse to turn 432 people against you in the congress there, all 400 people to turn against china to pass the relevant tough laws let's just give an excuse, it will be done and in china they understand it and so i think another strategy china is interested in the fact that both sides will exhaust themselves in this fight between russia and the united states. and he ended up winning , so the chinese will wait. because the chinese will play a slightly longer game than putin finally, mr. petre, i would like to ask you what you think about the so-called chinese peace plan, the reaction of the vice president of the european commission, franz timmermans, has already arrived, he expressed certain doubts about such an initiative -

this is his handbook, the peace plan can only work if the russian army withdraws outside the borders of ukraine, tim romance said , the only way to a peace plan is respect for the sovereignty and borders of ukraine, i quote, if we start with the assumption that the borders are not respected, then all hell will break loose but he made it clear that at the moment it is not clear, more precisely, that there are still some questions, so to speak, about what this chinese peace plan might look like. what do you think? i have 10 days of concepts. on the one hand, if taiwan exists, then who does the united states help, why can't russia have conditionally speaking, this is taiwan in ukraine , there can be such a rather cynical conversation, on the other hand, how the borders of ukraine will be violated while playing, why can't the borders of china be violated and taiwan can become an independent state? that is, it is a double-edged sword, and in china, this is deliberately

the proposal is blurred that at some point it was possible to use it and so and so, and to a greater extent i think that china is more interested in the fact that at the end of this confrontation, ah, well, to lean us on either side, yes, eh, on its side to do them is not what they do when they vote, and there they agreed that they apply to ukraine on what they receive and that they had their point where they said that we will not vote , we will vote. for example, for the chinese peace plan, in this i am a threat to ukraine i will explain which very quickly, very briefly, in fact there should be only one peace plan at the international level. russia is just interested in what was the chinese peace plan . what was the hungarian peace plan ? it was not for nothing that siav is coming to minsk . and the presidents of argentina are left-handed and so when you sit at the table and you have number plans, you have it's like a menu and you have a choice

i like this here a in this plan i like this and on the basis of this yes from various peaceful plans to collect and promote your interests and when there is only one peace plan on the table - the ukrainian one, then russia is either forced to accept it or forced to push it away and expose itself to the greatest international isolation, that is why the appearance of a larger number of peace plans is, of course, against our interests , because it allows russia to appeal to these alternatives and international isolation , and therefore it is very important for us to finally have not just an ambassador to china, but it is important for us to open a platform for negotiations with china and to convince them that it is the ukrainian interpretation of the economic sovereignty and territorial integrity, it also corresponds to the long-term interests of china . thank you, mr. peter petro burkovsky, political analyst, executive director of the democratic initiatives foundation named after ilka kucheryava, we inform you of

the most important 15 hours 44 minutes well, regarding the so-called chinese peace plan, it should be noted that the main , so to speak, pigeon in the paws of the chinese world, the emissary of all zenpina van and made a great voyage but did not fly to kyiv, if they wanted to take our position into account, i think it would be better a deeper consultation was held, not only a meeting with the minister at the level of the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, mr. kuleba, so we are waiting and will analyze it, and this is also a very interesting moment. china is deep in the fact that the war in ukraine is getting out of control , the minister of foreign affairs of china, qin gang , said this i will quote exactly. china is deeply concerned that the conflict in ukraine continues to escalate or even get out of control. we call on some countries to immediately stop stoking the fire, blaming

china and unblocking the rhetoric of ukraine today, tomorrow, taiwan said, he said, well, this is an interesting wording, the conflict in ukraine is getting out of control, well, ukraine is capable of some offensives, and this does not fit into the e-e appeal of the e-e russian-ukrainian war, which may, so to speak, involve third countries that is, this is about the internationalization of the conflict, in particular the war, my colleague about the peace plan of china, by the way, i have already received a signal from the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, the head of the foreign ministry of china, and shared with him the key positions of the peace plan, which will be detailed studied by our side after receiving the document in full, this was stated by a colleague at a joint press conference with the eu high representative for foreign policy josé pim borel. we are looking forward to receiving the text. details as soon as we receive the document. we will carefully study it and draw

conclusions. well, now we will talk about belarus. by the way, the belarusian district. we thank him for the information. four convoys with equipment of the military forces of the republic of belarus at night advanced in the direction of the border with lithuania. the ministry of defense of the republic of belarus declares that this is happening within the framework of checking the combat readiness of the armed forces. one of the military units of the mechanized unit, reinforced by air defense units, advanced in the indicated area. of the affairs of the united transitional cabinet of belarus, we congratulate you, mr. valery . glory to ukraine lives in belarus. glory live forever. good day to you. accordingly, we

would now like to ask you about these reconnaissance of russian interventionists on the territory of belarus yes. it seems that maybe they want to strain the situation on the border with lithuania a little. well, this is a fairly normal tactic for the russians and for the military and the social services of lukashenka, which will reduce the tension for of the entire region, of course, the most in this sense is reached in ukraine, and after the russian troops left the territory of ukraine, er, on the territory of belarus, all the time, in fact, we see that the increased military russian troops are coming, and these are for preparation, these are for modernization of equipment, these curtains are to be removed, and ammunition is for the russians, they are also doing this, and similar movements on other borders on the west , on the multiplied side of this, as here they are already putting pressure on on our subsidies from the nato bloc, in principle, it all shines only on one thing: lukashenko will threaten

his neighbors for all of this, and he fulfills the will of putin , yan mykolayovych, all the expectations of the father , that is what the ideal is. all to any situation, we are filled with instructions from the kremlin, and at no time will we think about the national interests of belarus , those related to our neighbors, ugu p. valeriu e-e, as far as the kremlin's plans are concerned , the strategic goals of the russian federation in the belarusian direction are supposedly so called, an internal document of the kremlin reports this is the russian edition of medusa, and we are talking about the actual absorption of belarus by russia by 2030, taking into account the current pace, as much as possible, taking into account, in principle, the sentiments of the real sentiments of belarusian society.

this oprasso is being led by russians in russia for a long time, and lukashenko is the best conductor of this policy, because he is ready to sell belarus for political support and to do whatever it takes to stay in power indefinitely, so after the 20th year, when and lukashenko lost the election, it was already completely betrayed and the passion of legitimacy in the eyes of a million belarusians, and his position was greatly weakened. the people are moving away from the dialogue, moved to repressions and haters, he was able to russia , eh, we see in the 21st hour, which was immediately after the elections, russia increased, expanded its military presence on the territory of belarus, signed 28 antigraation programs with the eh regime, lukashenko arrived novoe ambaksaderm gryzlov, who are known as some rather

influential political figures , are close to putin, and ion came not just like that. for everywhere there are attempts to take over belarus, and there is such a confusion of control , and not only we are talking about it, state control, first of all, we are talking about russification, we are talking about the destruction of the national identity of belarusians and goethe , russification in a few years has already reached an incredibly slow pace and formulas on cars in the soviet union did not have such a bad situation, such a difficult one, such a depressing situation, in that, for example, young people can speak the belarusian language in our cities, on the paths in the villages, and eh, it is certainly not done just like that this is done with one word to the director, as in the heart, simply in the belarusian understanding of the fact that and she is a special nation, eh, that i, they are not like that, i am a russian, and of course, this is a significant alarm, or we also mean that all these attempts will fail, and belarus mr. valery will live with us

, well, look, information has appeared that russia is preparing to absorb belarus by the 30th year, on the other hand, we understand that there is constant pressure on lukashenko to start mobilizing more and more belarusians it is possible to prepare this or that military provocation in order to drag belarus into a war, but lukashenko manages in one way or another to regularly postpone this matter, so to speak, and we all saw the last press conference, so to speak, in public, or rather, the meeting between putin and lukashenko and and lukashenko even quite unambiguously joked that he said to putin 's face, "well, didn't i have the choice not to come, that is, it's not a secret of the polischenel, so the president of poland, angeli duda, gave a very interesting version

, who said that in the event of belarus' entry into the war i quote, this would mean the final end of the regime and belarus. explain, please. why is this a simple combination, the free speech of president duda, who first of all showed that there is no pressure from putin on lukashenko, there is an understanding that the belarusian people simply will not tolerate this interference in the war by the belarusian military, namely howl , it deterred both lukashenko and putin himself from the ads order to lead the belarusian troops to war, because i don't understand why this can lead to stabilization the situation in belarus is even greater, which means that lukashenko can lose his power, and putin can lose one leg and a very important strategic ally, thanks to which he can threaten the 184 km border in ukraine , and for putin's war, this is not an acceptable loss this can actually stop the war itself, and because russia will lose the most significant strategic advantage over ukraine in the paranal since

2014, the creation of a project of national a teaching of 150,000 belarusians to approximately this number they are planning to involve the belarusians, said the minister of defense viktor khrenin, who said that the actual number could be even greater if we take into account the wishes of women, if such desiring people will of course appear, well, in your opinion, why is this formation being created, but in reality, even they are already ready to conduct a training course, and this is provided for by the corresponding project . well, lukashenka's feeling that the threat is being talked about, and at the same time, the threat is not just political and these economic pressures.

practical and serious, here we are the first to talk about the belarusian volunteers in ukraine, on which, in fact , by its very foundation , lukashenko is already violating the monopoly, and he is very afraid of them. this shows that he is ready and afraid of security and in public spaces, and that is why there is such a preparation for the scenario that eh can be reduced to belarus in varvaniya . belarus is a ukrainian from the world and to poland. how does he reason, although of course we understand that this scenario is absolutely not relevant today, uh, what, first of all, belarusian will appear in ukraine, as if it will defend ukraine from russian aggression. it is important to understand the situation within the political situation in belarus

today . for the consolidation of public lukashenko, who say stick to me , i will defend you. such a great victorious war will help politicians for a while, uh, raising their internal political problems, valery, in your opinion, when did the lukashenko regime approximately succeed in preparing the belarusian population for the fact that ukraine is an enemy, accordingly, it is necessary to support russian aggression against ukraine this is how we understand it would probably become a key argument for, so to speak, not thinking through ill-thought-out and possibly fatal decisions on the part of the lukashenko regime , which means

of course how is this ? i know that i left, in principle , they treat ukrainians differently than russians do, we can see from these statistics that 86% of belarusians are not afraid of these supports because the belarusian military participated in this war, er, our relatives, in principle , we are much closer, we understand each other more easily, er, and we will make it historical and non-linguistic in terms of culture, and that is why there is a certain address here, er, i do not think that it will be easy to convince belarusians that ukrainians are our lessons, but in the conditions when propaganda reigns on the territory of belarus , belarusians nevertheless do not give in to it, and they adhere to the position of the children of the renewal of the war , the more so because of the democratic power of independent honey and belarusian football.

they are working on how to deliver this information to belarusians, information about it, what are the uh, what are the processes, who is to blame for the ghettos, who started it, and against lithuania , what is the story, so to speak, comparing the belarusians to the euro-atlantic threat in quotation marks because this track is also rocking by the russians. well, this is the same history. lithuania is just as free for us as the neighboring ukraine, the hungarian people with whom we lived together for hundreds of years. therefore, attempts are being made to know that there is no threat. lukashenka's performance has already been 10 years, or at least the belarusians instead of going to russia, today there is a european one, ukraine is here, nato is here, and there they feel good for me, eh. therefore, it seems to me that this will most affect ukraine, eh, nato, which i perceive everywhere подобные ророзы seriously and-y rubitsya povednye steps, we also remember the situation that poland has now blocked

foreign transits from belarus eh-eh мгновета prose repressions about the zone in the morning not about internal problems and this can be one of such leads мы сдольные кодекс, which provides for the introduction of the death penalty for high treason , verbatim, the draft law provides for the possibility of applying an exceptional measure of punishment in the form of the death penalty to officials holding public positions and persons to whom the status of a military serviceman applies who committed the crime provided for in article 356 of the criminal code of high treason perhaps this is the same certain symptom valery kovalevskyi , the representative of foreign affairs of the united transitional cabinet of belarus, was with us on communication thank you now time of news on espresso tv channel anna evamen who will present greetings colleagues thank you for