[000:00:00;00] for example, i just recently saw a situation that, unfortunately, is coming to an end, but we will continue the topic of sanctions, and in particular , the possibility of confiscating the assets of the russian federation for the reconstruction of ukraine. thank you very much. end etersoudylay thank you for watching and we'll be back tomorrow goodbye it's hard to talk about what you feel when you're incontinent an unpleasant situation can arise at any time even from a slight effort fortunately - it's behind me feminost helped uro thanks

a natural component of feminost uro helps to restore control over urination in the melon at night now i feel confident feminist hurray urination under the control of cinema education free people have a choice choose what you want on megogo there are moments when the body quickly loses fluid, which can lead to dehydration when, of course, there is not enough water reo water for special medical purposes i save myself real for children i save reo and i save myself reo water for special medical purposes and what do you think about lacalut fix reliably fixes me my dentist advised me that particles of food do not get under the prosthesis and the price is good, the right choice for my pension, a new cream for expressive fixation of dentures and

healthy gums . the world, new fairy tales are made by russian propaganda, we will try to debunk them with our stop fake partners and the anniversary of the beginning of the full-scale russian invasion, when to wait for the ukrainian counterattack, you are watching spotlight is the only english-language program made by ukrainian journalists for the whole world. this is the ukrainian version. start a year after the invasion. kyiv survived and ukraine survived, democracy survived and america together with you , but it is already ukraine is already a member of

the european family of european culture and it should be institutionalized even not i know what it's like to call the theater of the absurd, some historic visit of the president of the united states, joe biden, to kyiv became the main topic, and at the same time , the biggest surprise of this week was the arrival of the american leader, who until the last kept secret indicates that the united states has no doubts who will win the war ukraine or russia all experts agree unanimously that is why the aggressor ukraine also did not delay in its reaction russia conducted nuclear tests and president putin generally stated that the country is suspending the member talks about strategic offensive

weapons that this is another nuclear threat this week, despite the security risks, joe biden came to show his support for the ukrainian people, this is a rare case when an american leader visited a conflict zone where the usa or its allies do not control the airspace and in kyiv , biden had to feel that he had come to ukraine and was at war . hundreds, together with volodymyr zelensky, joe biden honored those who died on the maidan, who became the first victims in ukraine's struggle for democratic freedoms and european integration. the us leader brought to kyiv

a new package of military aid amounting to 460 million dollars there will be additional ammunition for the heimers additional systems that will allow to protect the ukrainian people this week we will announce new sanctions and thanks to bipartisan support we will also allocate billions in the form of direct budget assistance, as reported by bloomberg with reference to sources in the pentagon, the united states also provides ukraine guided bombers that hit targets at a distance of 70 km. president biden and i talked in particular about how to do everything for our joint victory this year in the war, we must do everything so that this year we can put an end to russian aggression, give freedom to our currently occupied territories and provide guarantees of reliable security both to our state and to other

peoples of europe who want to live freely , our state has not accepted american leaders for 15 years the last time president george bush jr. came in 2008 to thank the american people and joe biden personally for their support on the alley of heroes in kyiv, the president of the united states was awarded a star roman very good that he decided i was not afraid to come, let's congratulate him to say so at his age, it is very good to do it . i think that it will affect the rating of ukraine as well, that is, ukraine for the whole world. people who lost probably well, not so much hope as a little bit of morale fell russia's response to biden's visit to ukraine was another nuclear threat on the day of the visit ukraine

a terrorist conducted a test of the sarmat heavy missile capable of carrying nuclear warheads but as the cns channel reported with reference to two unnamed american officials, these tests probably turned out to be unsuccessful, this can be evidenced by the fact that the next day , during the annual report to the russian parliament, president putin did not even mention these exercises, but said that russia was suspending its participation in the treaty on strategic offensive weapons, i repeat, precisely suspends , but before returning to the discussion of this issue, we must understand for ourselves what such countries of the north atlantic alliance as france and great britain and how we will take into account their strategic arsenals i urge russia today to reconsider its decision to suspend participation in the new sleep treaty

we must remember that this is one of the last major arms control agreements we have we are also increasingly concerned that that china may be planning to give deadly support to russia's war putin must not win it showed that aggression works and force is rewarded it will be dangerous for the whole world so we must support and strengthen our support ukraine at the first tripartite meeting in the history of ukraine and nato, which took place this week in brussels, not only discussed putin's statement, but also agreed on joint efforts in the production of weapons necessary for ukraine to fight against the aggressor. for this purpose, ukraine is and nato will create a coordination mechanism that synchronizes the work of producers, buyers and governments, so hoping to intimidate the west with nuclear threats, then gets only the opposite reaction, experts say, he really

relies more and more on nuclear weapons for to throw his weight around and try to keep the us and nato from supporting ukraine and what he gets out of it is really just another step in nuclear intimidation he is deliberately increasing nuclear risks a year after russia launched a full-scale invasion of ukraine the north atlantic alliance is as strong as ever and consolidated, us president joe biden said in warsaw and, summing up his visit to kyiv, he confidently emphasized that ukraine will never be defeated by russia, never about the visit of joe biden, as well as sino-russian relations i will talk to journalist and publicist vitaly portnikov. vitaly. congratulations. congratulations. the main news of the week is passing by. this is an unexpected, unannounced visit of the president of the united states to ukraine. what is the actual purpose of this ? joe biden's visit to ukraine? what

signal would biden himself like to send? thus , for putin, this is a symbolic visit. first of all, which demonstrates that a year after vladimir putin started his war against ukraine, the civilized world is on the side of ukraine, that there is no desire to help in that war ukraine has what is the desire to help the military economically, despite the fact that the kremlin is determined for a long war and despite the fact that public opinion in the west is slowly getting tired of this war and this help, politicians in western countries continue to believe that ukraine should be helped, this is a simple and important symbol ah, we even saw in the plot that during biden's visit to ukraine there was an air alarm, why did not a single nobleman fly over kiev that day moscow still heard

washington's warning and still there is something they are afraid of russians well, i don't think that they are afraid, i think that if the americans informed the russians about the arrival of the president of the united states, it would be strange to think that russia would start shelling kyiv at this very moment after a visit to ukraine. joe biden had many meetings with high-ranking officials in poland and allies how will the support of ukraine from the allies change after the conversation with biden, or will it change at all ? i think that the aid will continue as it looks and will be strengthened if there is a need and a meeting between biden and the allies on the eastern flank of nato speaks first of all about the desire of the united states to remind that it will strengthen this plan further and in the future, mr. portnikov , another important visit took place this week , which we also cannot ignore . china's chief diplomat in england visited moscow after the escalation of relations with

the united states, the sky has become noticeably closer to russia, what can this mean for ukraine? i think that the chinese are getting closer to russia not after, but before the escalation by the united states of china. russia is a natural ally, and these are two authoritarian regimes who are interested in weakening the west who are interested in the west not interfering with it because they consider them spheres of influence who are interested in having the right if they wish to resolve their issues by force and therefore it is absolutely obvious that for the people's republic of china, russian the federation is a tool for weakening the west and to some extent it can be said to be a nuclear umbrella because china's nuclear capabilities, at least today, are not enough to be , let's say, equal opponents of the united

states only in the union with the russian federation, the people's republic of china feels in such nuclear security . therefore, this is an absolutely logical union. now china generally wants to take on the role of a kind of peacemaker, that is , to act as the initiator of negotiations on the terms of the end of the war. if this happens, china will take on this role will china allow ? can we count on objectivity? it doesn't matter at all. the chinese plan is obviously a russian meeting, and i think that this plan is put forward simply so that china will later could have said, look, we proposed a good plan to stop hostilities, russia accepts these plans, and ukraine, with the support of the west , which pumps up weapons, does not accept. well, who is for peace , who is for war, everyone sees everything, and this will to some extent loosen china's movements for further cooperation russia's help, that is, china now still wants more russia's victory than ukraine's in this war. it is absolutely logical that if ukraine wins this war at the moment, it

will demonstrate all the weakness of the west and force western politicians to think 100 times if china wants to decide the taiwanese issue by force is absolutely logical for china that ukraine should disappear from the political map of the world so that it will never be on the other side. of course, china would not want this destruction of ukraine to be accompanied by the use of nuclear weapons, it is also clear that it does not need this precedent and here it is wants to support this balance, a russian victory , however, without the use of a nuclear component , can the united states in this case, knowing that china still wants a russian victory , somehow influence china even more press i think that the possibility of real influence of the united states on china is minimal, why is it roughly the way it is, as the americans tried to put pressure on russia on the eve of russia's offensive on ukraine, that is , the information that appeared the other day seems to be politics and put forth about what all that officials of the united states hesitate

to make public the information of their intelligence services that they have indisputable evidence that china still has not decided whether to help the military by supplying military weapons russia or not and if they still decide to help russia, in fact the united states will not be able to do anything about it, of course you will not be able to, he will not be able to announce any sanctions , well, china will live worse, there will be no economic crisis, but the democrat dictatorship has never understood what kind of democracy and leader dictatorships do not primarily mean economic growth, yes, they mean the preservation of their own power and the owner of opportunities, so that the possibilities of democratic regimes to influence the dictatorship are almost equal to zero, democracy can as a result to destroy the dictatorship economically, of course, risking a serious economic crisis in their own countries, and it is obvious that the destruction of the chinese economy is possible, but it

will be accompanied by a serious economic crisis in the west. was it too late? of course, thank you vitaly portnikov, a ukrainian journalist , a publicist, was a guest of the program spotlight ukraine, thank you to the dances and ukrainian men who are driving the masses to mobilization and in great britain itself, all other fakes this week were produced by the russian propaganda machine, and we are here to destroy these myths and legends of the ancient kremlin , together with our stopfake partners, that will be all, but first let's look at the plot in the usa, it is unlikely that abrams tanks will convey russian content to ukraine claim that several experts have said that there may be difficulties in using abrams tanks in ukraine, kremlin propagandists supplemented

the fake with alleged quotes from the material of the financial times publication, the american way the introduction of hostilities involves the introduction of technologies that increase costs and complicate the maintenance of equipment, because of this, it will be difficult for the armed forces of ukraine to maintain american abrams tanks , the british newspaper finanshall times reported , however, neither the author of the article nor the experts appearing in the material have ever indicated that the united states can refuse to transfer them to ukraine abrams tanks due to the technically complex process of maintaining their combat readiness , the stop-fake project is confirmed by either the author of the article step chaves or any of the experts interviewed the article did not state that the usa would soon send tanks to ukraine so that it would be difficult for us to service them, on the contrary, the article confirmed that after long discussions of the requests of germany and ukraine, the united states of america decided to send 31 tanks

with abrams 1 to ukraine, that is, the equivalent of one ukrainian tank battalion, the russian media selectively cite experts from the faynenchyna-times material who expressed fears that ukraine will not be able to cope with servicing abrams, but several analysts whose opinion the russian media did not take into account, they claimed that the us weapons system works without problems in great britain, ukrainian men are mobilized, this fairy spread in ukrainian social networks and russian media users refer to a letter allegedly from the british government stating that participants of the home for ukraine program must submit information about the residence of ukrainians male refugees aged 18 and over, a briton received a letter demanding the date of a ukrainian living with him , the disinformation center checked

the information by sending a request to the london of the human rights organization, the information center, officials and departments of great britain did not send such a letter about the alleged forgery of the document, lexical and grammatical errors and the domain specified in the letter, which was never used for official correspondence, are also evidenced by the russian mass media published several fakes about the speech of the us deputy secretary of state for political affairs victoria nuland said that victoria nuland's statement regarding crimea confirms russia's position on direct participation with the united states in the conflict, the statement of a high-ranking of the representative of the state department from february 16 on the support of the armed forces of ukraine in carrying out strikes on crimea, a clear confirmation of russia's position regarding the direct involvement of the united states in the conflict in the united states, but russia's war and are not participants in the hostilities in ukraine , the opposite statements are russian

disinformation based on a quote taken out of context by the intercessor of the us secretary of state for political affairs victoria nulent regarding the possible offensive of the armed forces of ukraine on crimea, regardless of what the ukrainians decide about crimea from the point of view of where they will decide fight etc. ukraine will not be safe unless crimea is at least demilitarized this is part of ensuring the existence of a stable deterrent i am not going to predict where the ukrainians will decide to fight or how they will decide to deal with crimea in the short, medium or long term we will recognize crimea as ukraine on february 16 during fundraisers' online discussions about russia's war against ukraine , nuland stated that the us considers

the kremlin's military bases in the temporarily occupied crimea to be legitimate the target for the armed forces of ukraine is spatlight ukraine ukrainian version and my next guest today this is mark suprun, the creative editor of aquage greetings mr. marko good evening , thank you for the invitation please so we are talking about fakes produced by the russian propaganda machine please tell me this week putin has done a lot loud statements, he made it his traditional rhetoric , i.e. rather militaristic uh, who did he turn to in the first place, a good question, you know how about me, first of all, he tries to uh, consult the support of which he remained inside the country, but there were certain moments, as far as i was concerned, it was addressed to the western audience, precisely that audience or that part regarding the nuclear beans, which they

announced that they would either suspend their participation in this agreement, and it was addressed directly to the the western audience because there is a real fear in the west about the use of nuclear weapons and escalation here or in russia, and unfortunately, it does not work well for family members, that is , among those politicians who make decisions, and many analysts i read, they are so and they said that, in principle, russia never complied with the agreement already in the 21st year , it seems that the last time they met was in october, and there was supposed to be a meeting last year, the 22nd year, not the 21st year, in cairo, but hmm, that's why it's like

me, it will not have the appropriate effect among people who make decisions regarding the continuation of military aid to the ukrainians but it had a certain secret in society, there were a lot of publications about it in canada , for example, it was talked about quite often on tv and it was separately noted to be separate articles, for example, in your depost and in world street genial, in which they always raise this insurance that it can be a nuke. he is oriented, let's hope for this, nevertheless, you just mentioned that russian propaganda does not always work exclusively on the help of mackers, that is, people who make decisions, but mostly also on the society

of certain countries if we compare why russian propaganda works much worse with the ukrainian audience and it would seem much more effective with the society of the western world because it would seem, when compared, that both there and there is democracy. yes, this is also a very good question, we talked about it and in my opinion it is thanks to the level of media literacy that it grew up in our country, first of all, and secondly, thanks to the work of such rootization as a column , for example, which has been in the 13th year, and they are working to dissect everything from the industry of the kremlin industry, such fakery. i would have said, hmm, the ukrainian audience is not used to this level of lies, but tactically, what kind of decision

was made by the national security and defense council a year and a half or almost two years ago regarding the suspension of crimean channels? i think that this had a huge effect on it gave an opportunity to people and journalists to work honestly, that is, this entire industry, and it has already been suspended, they did not receive the appropriate funding, and they could not convince the ukrainians of this lie, so first of all, how about me it's thanks to work such organizations, for example, in stavtek, and also good work from our colleagues from the field of family managers within the nsdc. they made a very, very good decision. how will it affect me? well, in 50 years, everyone will think

that this is the first step what about our victory and say yes every time i watch a review from stop fake about some new strange decisions to choose this or that strategy from where russian propaganda i have two one question on the one hand uh they came up with a fake about the fact that america supposedly it can be too attracted directly to vienna in ukraine, on the one hand, about nuclear threats, and on the other hand, a fake about the fact that ukrainians are allegedly being mobilized directly in great britain. but there must be some logic in this. if there is, what is it from the point of view of russian propaganda as they choose it, well, from the point of view of russian propaganda, they have three goals, as far as i'm concerned, it's to strike in the military direction , that is, to suspend military aid and military cooperation, that's the first reason, they

spread fakes about there fake criminal actions or and about the fact that, for example, ukrainians cannot study high technology from the west, this kind of fakes, and they are addressed to suspend military aid or to slow them down very, very much . and this will inspire me, this is a real threat, because our diplomatic front , our diplomacy, they have very good skills , even i would open a new one, how to keep different countries together and leave this one so that this unity

becomes well, it is very strong now, and hmm there where there where is the weakness? hmm, this is russian misinformation. recently, a former prime minister of belgium said that he was so suspicious of the theory that if there was no brexit, then it is possible that russia would not have attacked ukraine, because where they see - it's scary, so they would say, uh, they will hit on the topic of payments in order to disconnect this association, but we see that it does not work because 54 countries have joined the rammstein system, and military aid continues, and the third is that they simply have sown doubts, they begin to say a lot interesting things that have nothing to do with reality in relation to our efforts. well, what will it end with? it seems clear

to me that it will end with the fact that russia, well, they will return to their territory and ukraine , ukraine will remain uh-uh, they will renew sovereignty to the border 91 th year, and these doubts also don't work like that anymore. although they may have a certain sense , but you understand that 54 countries are speaking, even nuland, about what ukraine plans to feed, liberate of the occupied territory, this is a ukrainian issue ah, and the world understands this, and that's why it seems to me that even if they had invested billions of billions in this industry, they would be defeated and we would only be victorious, that's why we 're holding our ground. thank you for participating in the program spotlighty train ukrainian version mark

suprun e creative editor artua we continue the most since the beginning of the full-scale war lost manpower and no significant tactical successes . directions about the situation at the front in our traditional review, this is footage of fierce close combat near the village of novoselivske in the luhansk region, the occupiers are closing in on the position of the 92nd brigade of the armed forces of ukraine, lately this has been happening along the entire front line , the ukrainian military says, attacking in small groups, the russians are looking for weak points in our defense, but so far have not been able to achieve significant success in any of the directions , the main forces have again focused on taking