[000:00:00;00] there were politicians, economists, philosophers, literary critics, and art critics so that we could study the enemy and understand what is happening there, easter is different, that russian culture is toxic and poisonous. was already written after the beginning of the large-scale invasion, where you say that russia, a political nation, does not exist. yes, there is imperial russia, which captured many peoples, and recently the former president of mongolia sakha agin, e-e lbg dorosh spoke at the un. he actually directly blames putin for the fact that putin destroys the representatives of the mongolian ethnic peoples on the territory of russia, this is the case in particular with the buryats , tuvans, kalmyks, whom the kremlin simply sends as cannon fodder, these are actually quotes from the speech of the former president as cannon

fodder yes to the war of russia against ukraine er-e study of russia is er-e should it be extended to ethnic peoples in what way and what can we see ethnic peoples that russia is currently using in fact it also commits genocide inside the country er-e do we can we be allies with these people in order to win this war ? well, when i say, you see, there is also a lack of battery because we have one word, russians, which denotes ethnic russians, and i would not call them citizens because there is no real citizenship there the god of real citizenship is possible even when there is a political nation, let's say the population of russia, this is a forbidden word for population in the german language, it is very bifalic after the nazis, who called people like that

, but i won't choose another word for the name. here are all those who inhabit this territory, that's why when i talk about russians, i'm not talking about ethnicity. i generally think that ethnic discourse is very dangerous because it leads to nazism, racism, etc. when i talk about russians, i'm talking about identity, primarily social and historical - politically yes and that's why, for example, shoigu, he is russian to a greater extent than some ivanovs, yes, from moscow . when we talk about this russian evil, we are not talking about the ethnic origin of these people, we are talking about their belonging to such a perversion, yes, and such a disease as russia, i was born such an afrin that russia is a symptom of the disease of humanity, it is not just a local one

the phenomenon is a tv series, but it is actually a disease, but it can manifest itself in any country . but russia is such an obvious symptom of this disease. that is why, first of all, russians are not only ethnic russians. buryats from russia, but i don't know if they would be better off if this didn't happen, because russia doesn't have a conditional way , but it's from russia. a big question but who can we talk to there, who can we rely on, and who can we rely on, let's say i read a column yesterday or today, i forgot the name, this is a citizen, i understand ukraine in this way, what is the ethnic origin of jerzya, this is one of the saturday girls in which, by the way, there are not even russians there

they call it some kind of number two or something. and there are several gray and different ones. and here he is. by the way, he raised the same question that i raised , what does the victory of ukraine mean? such an opinion that the real victory will not be simply that russia withdraws its troops from the territory of ukraine, and not even the destruction, but the decolonization of russia, and ukraine must play an important role in this decolonization, we must, we must be one of the decolonizers. what will this work with by these peoples and it sounds attractive to me and attractive but at the same time attractive why because these things are unique we are a mistake conditionally pheophase plug in vegetables it is not created we are there again on that earth on that territory that what in 100 years will come to kill our descendants and unequivocal i don't have an answer, i don't know , that is, on the one hand

, it is impossible to leave things as they are, we have to be active, we have to impose a certain political, historical , social discussion, we have to work with these peoples and decommunize even the russians themselves because they themselves are the resources of the empire, they have not turned into a political nation . but won't this be another project created in kyiv that stagnates or turns into a threat to us in all of humanity for 200 years? everything that divides us is killing us here and there, total westernization and the next is the best. all of ukraine for sure. and whether we will be able to do it in other territories is a big question, but any kind of asianism, eurasianism is so deadly for us here, this does not mean that asia is bad, it means that asia is different, but here it is not asia, this is europe and i i don’t share the concept of eurasia at all. i think it’s a fictional artificial construct because

it smells a bit like russian fascism and nazism. i don’t accept this . well, i’m just as formal as the territory that is europe and asia, we are between us there is no ocean. okay, but if it turns from a geographical to a geopolitical, political, historical concept, there is a threat. europe is europe, asia , we have to live next to each other, we have to live in peace, harmony , but we don’t have to. i don’t know how to say orientate europe, but europe should be europe she she she she she she she she created this fantastic world which is very much love so western i think you too so i also want to live in this world if the chinese hindus do not want to live in this world that is their right but here the western world should be ours western civilization, so i am against any center moving there from moscow conditionally to kyiv. i am in favor of moving the european periphery as far as possible to the east. in many

private conversations with you, we talked about your experience of communicating with russians or, uh, with proposals, so what about you especially after we will start a large-scale invasion, start dialogues, start conversations with the russians, and here i will quote you again, you say that you can talk only with the russian who says that russia should disappear, but what to do in this context with the ideology that russia built yes, with racism, and whether is it possible at all, that is, whether the disappearance of racism will be the work of the russians or other people will work on the best solution scenario for ukraine , there are a lot of questions at once well, first of all, i am changing the fashion a little the question of that answer is because i don't expect the russians

to say that they want russia to disappear, well, it's hard to expect a person if she wants to say that she wants the country where she was born to disappear , although i would be such a person well you wanted to disappear into the soviet union absolutely, and that's why i say that i have the right to raise the issue like that because i lived. i was born in the soviet union. i hated it since childhood. i write about it . history and precipitation it came out at home in english now the dutch by the way now the spanish translation is being completed that is why i have the right i lived i was born and lived for almost 20 years in a country that i hated and i carry this trauma with me because hating one's homeland is a very painful experience but i i could not treat this monster differently, and the great happiness of my life is the collapse of the soviet union, so i have the right to raise the issue like this, but in principle i do not expect such

an answer even from the best of them. i expect from them, because what kind of answer that they are ready to imagine a world without russia, so they are ready to imagine, come on, public imagination is a very important thing, because on this one, as i would write , not a dictator, it is the imagination of the imagine community to change, and i agree with him nations aretions and if we agree that we are ready but forgive not only russians, germans, americans, french and a large part of ukrainians and ukrainian women, we are ready to imagine a world without russia, which does not mean a world without russians, unlike them, i do not call for killing people, i call for the dismantling of the empire - these are completely different things moreover, the dismantling of this empire can be a salvation for the russians themselves, because today they are dying in this war as much as we are, and that is why this is the first moment that it was lifesaving for them, but i am almost certain that i have not met and will not

meet a single person who connects itself with russia, which will at least be ready to imagine a world without russia, and it's terrible, now with regard to ideology, i'm not sure that what 's going on here can be called ideologies at all. this propaganda you can't name what is coming from there, and peter calls it an informational and psychological war, and the main task is not to promote any ideas, but simply to show that everyone is lying , that there is no truth in this world at all, and this is very dangerous, because when we things in truth and in fairness, they are interconnected when we refuse and post-magically from the truth, the next step is to refuse the good, the feeling, and from happiness, and this is where it comes from, because they have already agreed that life

is overrated. yes, what are we we all die because of it eventually death is beautiful, and that’s why they mentioned this scumbag, he doesn’t even want to name it, because i don’t understand at all what kind of monster it is, and they are educated, uh, he agreed to what we need to be unhappy, forgive me, but happiness is based on this in general all our ethics begins with this european ethics is aristotle aristotle looking for the highest equipment he finds it and this is happiness but it is not attainable but we must strive for happiness and on this is built one of the most beautiful ethics in this world ethicists demonism so that's why i wouldn't call it propaganda because propaganda promotes certain ideas and i suggest that you are right, there is a certain ideology lava it can be bad it can have can be good here i do not agree with mars that any ideology is a lot and said that it was he who created the most terrible ideology in the world well or one

of the two there , well, if we look at the more terrible, yes, ideas in themselves are not bad, and they can be or bad , or rather, but they can be bad, they can be good, and the promotion of ideas in itself is not bad, promotion is bad when we promote bad ideas, yes, and that's why what is happening in modern russia seems to me that there is no biology at all, it's a real world of death , that's it, if you can promote death, uh, well , i guess so, but it's not putin, how is it different from modern ideology, uh, russian, more precisely she was always like that because of nazism that the nazis say that there are people who do not deserve to live and it is terrible, this is this evil, absolutely i do not want to compare it with anything but what do the russians say, no one deserves their life and who will live

decides each specific moment some scum either the tsar ivan petrovich mykola or general secretary lenin stalin brezhnev gorbachev. by the way, i will say something like this: i am cursed for this, but here is the figure of sakharov. i understand that this man suffered a lot. i understand that he is a symbol to a certain extent for russia and, accordingly, for the whole world, a symbol of something liberal and democratic for russia, well, for the world, it is something good in russia, but why did sahara become the way it became? well, because, after all, this was a person who, to a certain extent, is sure that she atoned his guilt, because he contributed to the fact that russia, in the form of the soviet union , stole nuclear weapons from the civilized world and today today, she blackmails everyone with these nuclear weapons i wish such a fate and i myself understand that

the suffering through which he came is a horror, that's why i have no ethical and moral right to evaluate or condemn him, but we must understand that this is a person who was not born so beautifully stifling, who became a human rights defender and a dissident etc., he had quite a difficult path to this, yes, but uh, in the modern world debate, this is reflected in the nobel prize, which is awarded to russian organizations together with ukrainian ones. and uh, i understand that maybe those people live in more terrible conditions, but give it to you the motherland is something you created. and you did not drop putin from space, i repeat this constantly, yes, putin is not a demon who fell from space, it is an organic manifestation of what is happening there, it has always happened in literature and in science and in philosophy, if possible

to talk about their philosophy and in their history and in their in their in their society, which is also not fully developed, so we come back to this question again, how to work with it, who to talk to, i have no one to talk to, yes, it comes to my mind when freud was asked to sign a petition against the nazis, he refused. why does he say i can't write a petition against my potential patients ? yes, it's the same with the russians. since how to work who is it german nazism has to do - it is a terrible disease that i contracted. in principle, i don't want to say a healthy people, but a people among nations. yes, the germans were treated for a long time from nazism, and one of the methods of treatment, i can imagine that it was possible to treat them there read, let's say, the german classics, let's say goethe's faust, because goethe is the essence of humanity and he speaks to everyone to everyone, and try

to treat russians by letting them read the same pushkin, it will intensify the disease why because the disease is the heart of their identity and therefore they are so afraid to recover because if they recover and they will not be themselves, it does not mean that they will physically disappear, but they will lose their identity and it is very painful because the germans did not lose their identity by cleansing it from nazism or the italians from fascism or the spanish from francoism yes, but the russians risk losing their own identity, and for them it is a very polemical process, and i understand it, but i knew it. these are not my problems, these are their problems, which became ours only because they came to kill us because of their own sick identity. i want to conclude. yes, we talked a lot about russia today , and i think that this is not a problem, because we are discussing enemies and understand it better. but how do you see

ukraine, how do you see the ukrainian dream, and most importantly, can we feel happiness as a nation? well, now and after the victory, well, let’s face it, i recently had an aphorism about dreams that sometimes the sweetest lollipops of fate are the fragments of our own dreams, and that’s why it’s important to dream, but dreaming is sometimes dangerous and i wouldn’t, well, i wouldn’t draw some kind of dream idea ukrainian i worked with today's problems, this is, in the end, the recipe that karl popper gives us in the description of the secondary bricklayer and the open society, and he says , be afraid of philosophical barnacles, who is plato, marx and hegel, be afraid of these sages who come and give us recipes for happiness or justice, how should they be implemented, they lead us to death, to destruction

, to totalitarianism, to all the horrors that we saw in the 20th century, so politicians should not be philosophers. yes, and when you ask me, why do you no, i say, i am a philosopher, i have no right to go into politics, well, in such a narrow sense of the word, yes, but politicians are social engineers who must understand socio-political very well for this, there is no socio-political processes for this. they demand to learn philosophy, history, literature or there is a shortage of politicians, and ours and some not ours, too. yes, but they don't have to be philosophers. they have to be engineers. they have to solve specific problems. there is a problem, you have to find a way to solve it, if the solution requires a philosopher, historian, economist, and politician will call him and say here i don't quite understand, tell me yes, but the politician himself is an engineer , it's such social engineering, that's why i wouldn't talk. in general, about some kind of vision of the global, i would talk to you about

instrumental things and i have already said about them, this is a workshop, we have to understand that ukraine is an organic part of europe and that's what has changed, i always understand that the only thing that has changed is after february 24, 22nd that little by little understanding is coming for us and for europeans that not only ukraine needs europe and europe also needs ukraine, yes. and if this awareness will dominate here and throughout europe. well, for all transferological civilizations , then for me it is, in principle, a tool of salvation, and regarding happiness, again, i am arid, according to aristotle, he is already starting no insect like that shch- from the fact that it is rightly assumed that everything in this world strives for good, not everyone, but everything, that is, good, the principle of the world belongs to human society, and the highest good is happiness, but why do we strive

for what we do not have, and therefore to be happy it's impossible all the time. and it's the same as having a very high level of serotonin in the brain all the time, yes. it's not possible . well , happiness is not . happiness is an intersubjective phenomenon, it is a social phenomenon , yes, and yes, more adults understand that happiness cannot be permanent, this is you, some kind of infantile attitude towards life, happiness is that it sometimes arises, and it can arise only between people, between us, that’s the way it is. sometimes they are just born in a conversation, in a touch, somewhere close to a person, in which joke, i don’t know, it flares up and goes away, but what we have to understand is that there are conditions for the impossibility of happiness. freedom does not guarantee

happiness. this is an adult attitude to freedom, but what this means freedom does not guarantee happiness, but as we say, slaves are not allowed into paradise , that is, if you do not have sex, you cannot be happy, the absence of freedom is a fundamental condition for the impossibility of happiness, but freedom does not guarantee happiness, happiness must be fought for while remaining free, thank you i thank you very much. i remind you that this program is a cultural instinct for social culture. my name is sofia chilyak and today we spoke with the philosopher, writer and translator vakhtang and bulatse live in ukraine. the world needs food to protect protect your last year as we woke up at 5 in the morning the year of goodbyes a year of pain

that changed our lives forever a year of how we fight in the dark with bright hearts we were given two days and we stood together a year you know the country of heroes the country of the brave we inspire we fall in love we dare to believe in freedom we believe in ourselves and our victories, we are not the only one, we do not know glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, we chose our country, it chose us, we destroy the enemy

, we are hardened in battles, we value brotherhood, we protect our own glory to the brave, glory to the son of the territorial defense force of the armed forces of ukraine , our strength is in unity we support the armed forces, we will donate volunteer we fight for our own and seven more than a million ukrainians need housing you have the opportunity to accept refugees from the war zone leaves an ad on the website of the shelter

victory is one for all shelter everyone from us protect your spirit the strength of your spirit is like light it is the light of the whole world i pray that it will be bright enough to lead you through this darkness we must invest everything in the ukrainian people all my heart is with the ukrainians hello i am here in ukraine it is impossible to believe how terrible the situation is in ukraine i want to say i am with the ukrainians i give my heart to ukraine we have to help as much as possible i am very proud the war must be won

i am absolutely sure that they will win in the 20th tsn week facts of the week for the marathon the only news, watch the most important things in the final programs of tsn week and facts of the week, the hosts to whom the whole country listens about the strategy and tactics of our victory, about the most interesting and often hidden details of each event, we return the air to understand together what is happening, why, and what to expect next, an accurate and verified analysis of events we talk simply and clearly about the key events that change our lives news that impresses you will know where to act more precisely tsn week and facts of the week for

the marathon - the only news every sunday at 20:00 hello, today we will talk with the earth. antonyuk is a journalist, blogger, co-author of viburnum, youtube is on fire and i understand that the author of a separate channel now, no one will watch it, but we will talk about everything in turn. when there is already a separate youtube channel that has a name, no one will watch it with the same name, there were video interviews in your conversations with various guests, why did you decide to separate because it's on fire - it's already recognizable, i'm not even afraid of this word brand why so peleya is a joint brand of me and yana brynza and this video where we discuss three good valuable topics, no one will watch this interview, it is a completely different genre and as a rule it is not watched by the same people who come to watch the discussion i think

that when it will become a separate project was a matter of time because it is easier. from the point of view of how people look for interviews, what kind of audience comes and watches the content, so it was just logical when we talk about your colleague , jana brandzei, with whom you also and friends e important and such for me. hmm, it is a moment for pride when publications nominate you as blogger of the year, although we are already talking about 2023 , but the 22nd is still breathing down our necks , so we can talk about it. satisfaction that i am well done. i did something good. i found out about it by chance and, to be honest, i didn't pay much attention , that is, i saw it, smiled and moved on . it seems to me that when you work on youtube, you

interact very closely with subscribers and this is already a big community and you react to how people interact with you, what comments they write, how many people come to the book club, how many marks stories with the books you read together, and that's what i'm focused on, i'm terribly happy and i'm really happy when we were included in the bloggers of the year, but the degree of attention is already somehow shifted, and maybe because our brain likes some symbolic things and if i don’t know, uh, there was some event where the bloggers of the year would be present or if this publication wrote because i just happen to be somewhere in the feed saw well, in a word, if it was something that the brain would see, focus and feel, then maybe there was a different reaction, but it passed almost imperceptibly, uh, i still have a very interesting moment, uh, that you talked about in

one of your interviews, what about in your opinion, every journalist is a journalist who works in the frame, they, uh, somehow nurture this inner narcissist, that this is some kind of goal to prove themselves, to show to make sure that this is how they see it and perceive it, but criticism is an integral part. how do you feel about criticism i would be careful with the word narcissist, because i myself am careless with him, i must have awarded such a person somewhere, after all, it is a psychological term, i do not think that all people who work in the frame have a real narcissistic disorder, but the majority of them. is actively engaged in blogging. i think most of them have a share of vanity and there is no need to be ashamed of it. it is true. people who say something on camera to a large number of people are seeking approval . of course, this story has a dark side when people

receive criticism, it is difficult for me to deal with it because i once said when there was not yet a large number of subscribers , and i was sure that well, you are engaged in public work. sharks and for you to evaluate this is not true, people are not always ready for a large number of people, and it can be in very fishy, ​​dangerous forms, it can sting a lot, you and i talked about it a little before the broadcast, eh, comments can be m - m very bad, well, it's the same as if i come to buy coffee and say to a berish woman, uh, your lipstick is terrible , this collar emphasizes the yellowness of your teeth. and in general, you talk like meowing, i'll take a coffee and go, they think, god, she's so weak, what's wrong with this person, people are not like that behave during personal contact because well, that's