[000:00:00;00] impressions of the enemy's armored vehicles, but to cover the fire points there and to work with another body, roughly speaking, anti-tank complexes , like javelins, our domestic ones, in principle, helped to preserve the safety margin of our artillery, and maybe it would seem so thin. angels will fit on a needle, but such thin edges helped us to hold on, otherwise, if it were not there , it would be obviously more difficult for us to talk about uh let's say this correspondence in arms with other means , it is free to drive , so that we don’t have time, you know. we didn’t get stuck in this , you know.

that we are, as it were, opposing the f16 with a mortar, yes, no one is asking the question of what those f-16 mortars are there , let's immediately ask the question that in 16 we also need as elements to provide support well, not that i, even if there of the incomplete offensive of our troops, it is a structural element in order to seize air superiority, but not deterrence , and although it is simply some kind of local air superiority in some of the areas so that our tankers would have more favorable, more favorable conditions for combat work. then so that we can already use the same number plates, they say, and move to melitopol, because well, if we rely on open sources there, well , judging by everything, well, the success of our podharkov counteroffensive was determined, including in that that the russians could not quickly use aviation because, after all, for the german anti-aircraft cheetahs there, these targets were there for work, that's why the theory turns out that even if there are brothers there, eh, let's say this is a construction that arose from the fact that there we

need against the rashists first of all, mortars. well, the russians, for example, when they form assault units there and develop them, they are not assault groups, they act like that under the bachmouth. well, they thus repeat, for example , the proton technique strategy that they used in the same syrias. but there is one such story of the russians with such and such a combat formation , they could quite successfully advance against the enemy who did not have the support of aircraft there, therefore, the same wagners could have light armored vehicles, shortening machine guns, and others there . - for the american aviation, when several hundred of these were destroyed in one or two days , this is the border of lessons. accordingly, we are now in the same situation when in fact we need not only tanks as soon as possible, but also let's say this any aviation that can strengthen hmm, our strike capabilities are also as soon as possible, because if we talk about deterrence, then western

theorists, when they start building constructions there , and these planes will give, in principle, that we were able to build the so-called closed access zone system there, if only and we can't fly deep in the summer to work on the objects of the rashists, but the rashists can't also fly behind and work on our objects along the line of understanding, they say that ours are so direct 8 and 20 even there are six such millions to 52 are forced to work. somewhere there is far away scraping, that is, they ask the question, so what, they say, does it give to aviation in modern warfare , well, they say, nothing, so what to check there, we need to focus on some things there, we are more on dry things for ukraine but then we have three fears so that we don't get stuck in this format of infantry battles that try to impose rashists, we need to do everything as possible at the same time, roughly speaking, if there is a need, then one should remember about some joint developments of our kb better with the poles on the topic of self-propelled

mortar cancer on a tracked chassis well, well, and in parallel, for example, the same poles, after all, he could ask something polite, or otherwise, if we are going to engage in such a discourse, uh, from one side, then what do we have f16, let's use a mortar, and then from the other the parties to shake the unequal may not be as joyful as they would like, even i have so far such a question, well , it is clear that it will not be resolved in the next 2 weeks, there are three weeks, yes, that is, well , at least we will not see them on the battlefield , let's say so, but well, at least the perspective of the month what would we hmm what would it make sense igor to strengthen now and that well, what can be delivered in a month very quickly and that it could actually be at least somehow possible to improve this whole situation well, let's do this, first of all i want to pay attention to a small clarification, that is , saying

about the f16 or about mine, it doesn’t matter to me now it’s not a matter of principle, the experts already have something to do, they say to think about it, but nothing, we need aviation, we need aviation primarily as a cover for our counter-offensive operations, and here i completely agree with that what exactly well, everything that flies in russia will hunt for tanks , those leopards , everything that flies, everything will hunt for the same leopards, we need to cover them from the sky, and from the sky to cover them with what? at least yes, the second point about the artillery, look at the nazis actually successfully used a shaft of fire when they did not have problems with the logistics of ammunition to the front line, that is, they used artillery, leveled the square with the ground, roughly speaking, disassembled for my reception and left

then they received the infantry, moved away from us 100-200 m, covered again the next square or the next block in the urban area, it doesn’t matter and went again, they went 100 m forward and 5 received and 5 left a little again , they covered the following square and in fact their advantage in artillery was observed. i would i would have said that by the autumn, they prevailed now in many directions, interestingly, interestingly. that is, now you think that they are not able to concentrate such a serious artillery force in them again. so on and so they tried to do it with the help of a fire wall today, having to a certain extent , i don't say that everywhere, but in some areas there is a shortage of ammunition because we drink the logistics routes, we hit the logistics centers , the hymers get one at a time from their warehouses bc and so then they are now economizers, in fact, artillery and tanks let in another mechanism - it's infantry, well, i'm already so simple. they're trying now, you know, they

replace the former fire shaft with this meat shaft, as they say. well, as the guys call it, that is, they throw infantry because they have infantry well, the resource is not limited and they will still recruit students, they are going to mobilize more conscripts , listen, in russia they have an army of one and a half million conscripts have not yet fought, but propaganda is already saying that young conscripts are rushing into battle , you understand. they will do it soon. that's why we it is necessary to prepare for this the second moment, you mentioned for three sevens , so three sevens allow us to work more jewelry well, but here the question is not even about the three sevens themselves the fact is that each artillery installation has a certain resource barrel further, most of our artillery is sharpened of soviet caliber. what did the russians do during the invasion canon, they blew up warehouses with soviet calibers in and in the czech republic where there were the largest warehouses of the former warsaw pact, so to speak, and they actually blew up where

they could not buy it, and skazhem so great minds, instead of transferring the artillery to the 155th caliber of the nato standard, e-e engaged in the acquisition of e-e saudian in the soviet caliber, instead of developing our glory bohdan, who works on 155 nato caliber and we have a lot of such things, because i don’t want to go into the political plane there now, but there are few soviet caliber in the world. today , if we are talking , i mentioned mortars , for example. not only the pipes are needed, the pipes themselves, they do not shoot, shells are needed, and as far as i know to this day, well, in principle , the shortage of 120 120-caliber mortars was still in the spring, and it did not affect the three bulls

that laid the mortar battery, according to my positions are 1,500, i could answer 10 mines, maybe 15 units of things, not thousands, but units for one and a half thousand. that is, you can imagine what a gap there was in the capabilities of artillery. that is why it was difficult for us, and in fact all the infantry survived the whole spring and the whole summer at the expense of the shovel, not at the expense of oxide who digs from behind positions no a with shovels, moreover, it was necessary to leave half of the personnel to hold the lines, and the other half of the personnel was engaged in digging the trenches of the dugouts in manual mode, and this only led to the exhaustion of the servicemen, and such an impression was not moving on to the political component. however, we don't have those crustaceans that dig trenches all over the world, you understand. and we have one machine made of a shrew, as we called it

, that's how she was alone, she was alone for 500 km, what will she dig moreover, it was breaking because it was still in the soviet year of graduation, i must have gone to school when it was released , that's why there are problems, and today, when we talk about the parity of artillery , it is only in some areas today, only now, at the end of autumn, if we are talking there bakhmut, are we talking the same vugledar, only today we are roughly equal to each other, but this is only in some areas, and in other areas the rashists have accumulated a very large amount of artillery. only tanks, i don't say how many artillery systems there are, but the most important thing is the shortage of shells and, against this background, not a single penny of investment in the construction of ammunition in our territory, and today i 'm not just talking about 120-caliber or something

152nd and today we hear the statements of our baltic colleagues that the economy of the european union means the release of projectiles in the european union in a month they release as much as russia releases in one day according to our positions. and they are now telling our european partners that we needed to release taking into account such and such a gap in the number of shells on the front line. weapons, of course, i'm talking in the complex, but as a person from the field, i really ache for the infantry when the boys tell me that the commander in our battalion had five e-e of these e-e machine guns, so there are only five machine guns left according to the norm 40 e 47 and there are five and when we talk about infantry battles

, it is direct because i am a clash between, let's say, infantry, when the distance to the enemy is 5-10-20 50 m, then with one machine gun, you can't fight a head without a machine gun and western partners for example , thank god they gave us mg-43 machine guns but this is the so-called hitler's comb. it was called that, they are good, they are fast-firing, it's just that the barrels heat up three times faster than in pcs . and during direct close combat . solves the issue of fighting against other artillery and mechanized units, and in a close encounter , when the distance to the enemy is small, you don't do anything there with a cannon, because your cannon can destroy and your soldiers will not be

you can catch 5 or 10 with one gun there , some kind of sabotage group there. well, if there are maviks, which we have already talked about a lot, or other quadcopters, i will not specify which ones. but again, in russia, they have created a kind of army based on drones. of full-time positions in units that would be engaged exclusively in air reconnaissance full-time positions at the platoon level at the company level at the battalion level and the number of correspondence to these full-time positions everything that is provided is provided by volunteers, that's what the problem is, in the eyes of art and it is all the more unfortunate that, in principle, in the first year of the war, the ukrainian army itself managed to have an advantage, which was because there were drones, night vision devices were better equipped, thermal imagers were better equipped, it’s just that how was it left on

such a thing let's say yes to the volunteer level. that is, no one has drawn conclusions in the court that of all that if this is an action, then it must be developed and it must be put on the stove, it's a shame and here ivany and then i have such a question for you, well , look, we are talking about what is not enough there are still some soviet-style weapons of this type, and is this task at all realistic during hostilities to completely or partially switch to nato weapons and provide them to everyone ? at the end, it is clear, that is, constantly. we say that we are switching to nato weapons, and then it turns out that the aop does not have shells for it or

the weapon itself. can you explain to us the village of the defense of ukraine, there are one million military personnel there, or even more if someone spends. also, remember that as of the beginning of 1992, we had 700,000 troops here with several thousand tanks, because harrows, machines, guns and the like and therefore similar with the corresponding material and technical support, which was wasted during the time of independence, it is necessary in general, it turns out that we have much more people under arms than in soviet times, accordingly , we have such a huge grouping of troops to provide it all at once. unfortunately, it is physically impossible. i don’t think that this is correct. it’s just very bitter that when we have pate, it would seem that even the romanians supply it there, where they put it so neatly on the cheeks on these sifikapy eh for fighting martyrs and at the same time it turns out that those who have few resources as such, they are still

possible and not quite correctly distributed that's why the problem well, especially since it can't even be that due to the fact that, well, that's what is responsible persons in the authorities there the military-political leadership was not audited and it turns out that we may have too many to protect against flying mopeds. and here there is no problem that really on one side you look like that where can we switch well what is called switching to nato-style weapons there it is necessary to pass where these needs cannot be closed, it is necessary to take soviet weapons, but on the other hand, here you can ask the question yes , and until when will we depend exclusively on external supplies there, we need to develop something of our own not only there is ammunition, well, ammunition production, but also other production. hmm, the production of other equipment turns out that if we recall even the same

times of the second world war. i am not really ready, neither is great britain, in which the depth charges did not work against the germans, for example, the germans themselves did not work as they should, that is why they lost the opportunity there , for example, he planned to kill, but he did not use the bombs worked as it should, the wehrmacht had the fact that at first he was happy with the gifts of trophies from czechoslovakia, then he was somewhat happy with the gifts of trophies from the french army, relatively speaking, because it was actually written about the soviet union, and let’s say it like this, i will accept the king correlation of his victories from supplies for american leonism, when everything was supplied for warships, you can talk a lot about great britain, too . roughly speaking, this leads me to the fact that during such large continental wars, all states in the machine to solve the question what is the transition and outdated morally or physically outdated weapons samples to something more modern here, the simple question is how each

of the states approached the won the war thanks to the fact that they were able to create competition for those who will create more resources this is either inside of the state itself or competition for those resources will be effectively attracted . to create and multiply resources for war has not yet been observed, and it’s not only there at the level of lifeless conversations that volunteers there should, for example, agree on the purchasing policy in europe because it is still available somewhere else . mr. yes, he is the strategist of prom, which arose there for the first time in a year of war in the context of the fact that one of the representatives of the military and political leadership was gathered here to transfer ukroboronprom, who promises cotton, tells, if on the one hand, about

incredible successes in projectile production, and then different people tell us that, you know, we already have no advice from the numbers, you understand , while we are stuck, it turns out to be at such a level that we cannot solve the basic problem with the production of projectiles, here it is also worth putting such an emphasis well, one of the problems that i understand is that our troops at the front are bothered by these russian lancets . electronic stuffing from vape cigarettes and children's toys with a microcircuit, this is already well, perhaps such an image begs for it, but it is not enough that the russians still retain a certain respect for artillery, they actually managed to create something like this guide, not well, analog shells caliber 152 mm and it turns out in this way that he is trying to use flying artillery to attack our troops, well , you don’t know, but it looks impressive, but how effective is it possible

? we also have to ask the question of what. lost the initiative on drones that we are behind, we are falling behind fatally catastrophically and this lag looks not only at the level of technology but that this revolves around specific deaths of people uh well, which one do we know from ecology, whom we already knew and personally and that here we have to move, sorry, move differently we don't have satisfactory strategic prospects here , let's say carefully, we really know or what could happen in time. well, in principle, i don't have much time left , let's try to outline it anyway hmm, what should it look like, this is an attempt to reasonably provide what we need now in order to really achieve a turning point in our favor well, let's

talk about it already, let's not call it a counteroffensive well, but somehow well really, so that we only see the news that we want to see with the rest. well, you know, recently there was an interview with the owner of the byraktar plant on one of the tv channels, where he said that in order to connect the light for the production of byraktars , the plant remembers the priests that we will soon, bayraktar will be made in ukraine, just to turn on the light, it will take two years and 10 million bribes. well, what should we do? we should see criminal proceedings and the person who wanted a bribe behind bars, everyone swallowed silence, so you know when there is a request from society. justice he sometimes comes to the concept of the court itself, because there are no judges, there are no courts for those corruptors , there are no courts for those uh bribers , but there is a request from society and sooner or later it can

simply break through and we will lose the rule of law so we can lose the rule of law and build i don't know there according to the laws of wartime i decided it myself i judged it i executed it i brought the sentence into execution and it can be very risky because we should do it well corruption is what eats away at irza ukraine from the inside, and if we have already talked about the need to increase the criminal liability for civil servants during the war , at least 10-15 with confiscation for all , yes, three ears of stalin, because this draft law 81 82 71 on responsibility he is like that to the military personnel, order 227 was once presented, don't take a step back , this is in relation to the soldiers, let 's do the same in relation to the corrupt, let's do the same with stalin's knife, step back, three ears of corn, 10-5 prisons, and then we will see i don't understand why you say this

but i'll tell you this, well, it may please someone and give the impression that there is some justice, but strategically and even tactically, it does not in any way encourage you to invent something new, but it is about how to invent something new, that is completely different plan the task is to mention new things in the fight against corruption, we have so many anti-corruption bodies, listen, you take what already exists , how to make something appear, you understand , well, there is none, there is nothing to distribute , there are no drones in the country, how long will they talk about corruption, the drones will not appear because no one will produce them, well, the truth is, of course, no one will produce them , because we have unfavorable economic conditions for the production of drones. well, wait. well, like during the war

. they won’t be, that is, during the war. russian the federation is made of shit and fire and it will destroy the armor. and we say during the war that we can’t, why can’t we, and we can? and you just have to look in the direction of those people who do it, and if today our same kulibins, as they say, make some drones uh, up to 10 pieces per month, then it is possible to pay attention to them so that they do, give them conditions for them to make 100 pieces per month or a thousand pieces per month, something we can’t. involves a rollback a procurement involves refusal, and therefore we need to clean it up if the process, that is, then oh, look here, we then came to something a little different, how should we stimulate then and what to do in order for the order to be, or even to order, so that there would be some order system so that

people who were already doing it could have done it. well, we are talking to you now, old ether , but everyone is already shouting about it. adviser to the minister of defense and we have to put him in prison , otherwise the evil will not be punished and we say again that we cannot do anything vanya was developed and she was displaced, then she must be returned, then we will remove the corruption component if a person has already been caught once because does not fulfill his obligations to the ministry of defense. and i am speaking now for the director of this laying, through which eggs are sold at uah 17 per kilogram. he used to head the bilotserkivskyi enterprise, there is a certain

voyentorg, and there the debtor was not his should be put as a director of a company for which tomorrow they will give 13 billion, so i emphasize once again that if we do this, we will not win the war, they will, in principle, be difficult here , it is difficult to argue with you because it is absolutely true, yes, that is, if people failed once it is unlikely that they will succeed in something else, ivan. what do you think, what should be the directions in which it is worth working at all, such a conceptual, central direction that even in western political opinion , corruption occurs where it is rather a symptom corruption is arbitrarily more inefficient production, yes, if we are already talking about inefficient inefficiency , principles, well, let's talk about the theory of the administration, the structure should outline what, comrades, we need all of them. in history, what are the different types of grouses to put there, name it, remove it and stand up and send it to the ambassador in china, and this is

despite the fact that if this structure does not even report on itself even in such a limited format ukroboronprom would seem like well, at least this structure should show some signs of life, well, at least, you know, in terms of sending such a public signal of style , what do you know? one more point, if there is something that concerns, for example , trophy weapons and the like, well , on paper, it looks like they took a lot of russian trophy tanks, guns, and the like, but their distribution may not have been so effective, so what is possible here would be worthwhile to copy exactly from the soviet military vehicle, that was, well, the so-called red army during the second world war, the administration at the gbt, which was engaged in the distribution of trophy equipment. it is possible to take something on the chassis for the production of other armored vehicles there, or simply to form some integral units from trophy equipment, maybe we can finally instead of spraying these trophy cars, because i know what condition they are in by individual divisions and after which they break down there, the ability

of the division falls, well, finally, although it’s all somehow, it’s because, for example, the activity, well this soviet, let's say so, body for trophy e-e machines can even be seen in our country on monuments when somewhere in the west of ukraine, there is a court 76 on a german panzer, three tanks are standing in the form of a monument, yes, this is all used by israel. to use your t-55 trophy tanks to convert them into a brand of transporter zagrit, which is not bad, so they served well, okay, we got it, we captured the trophy, we have at least 40 t-62 tanks, in theory, it’s also a good thing, but how is even such a rarity that you can to use how it was distributed, well, something, for example, the volunteers of the prytula fund took it to repair, but it does not lead to a cumulative settlement of something , at least once, yehor, here i will point out that there are not enough engineering machines, maybe all the t-62s were worth converting to these engineering machines that instead of these little guys, we would take them for smoking, well, reservations. maybe there were two for the t-60

, it would be good to dig, but there is no efficient distribution of resources, so we , too. we will now suffer from the fact that on we will receive a lot of paper. that is, we can talk for a very long time about what is missing directly on the battlefield. thank you. thank you. resources are planned, how further development is planned, how further actions are planned, comes to the fore, and if there are any such incompletely completed things, well, it will come out, so it will complicate life and it will make new victims and more this is not solved yet, in fact, no further, it is impossible to get new weapons , it is impossible to use them, it is impossible to change the situation, it is impossible, in fact, nothing , well, you will not do anything until you solve the old problems . that is the conclusion from our conversation. thank you, it was

ivan kyrychevsky, a military expert, a defect express ihor laping special officer officer of the armed forces of ukraine people's deputy of the 8th convocation thank you, gentlemen. well, see you soon. glory to ukraine, this is a program, the verdict. my name is serhiy rudenko . good day to everyone and good health today. march 1, 371 days of heroic resistance of the ukrainian people to the russian occupiers. during the past day, our aviation made 11 strikes on the areas of concentration of the occupiers, and rocket artillerymen hit nine areas of concentration of manpower and the area of ​​concentration of military equipment . sometimes the russian occupiers