[000:00:00;00] acceptance of the composition is one of the scenarios that examines all the analysts and in addition, i want to say that now we had such a large landing of hungarian politicians , businessmen and officials who came to moldova in the gogun region in the glagolovo region. moldovans are going to ignite a national one there. wake up these google to support the pro-russian gogun politicians. i didn't come to them . predupredel how did govorzov say that if they take the pro-russian path, they will not count and they will have big problems that they must support moldova and choose the european path eh now i am not coming they say that they must become more independent

that they will get help from hungary is probably what they want to conduct such an experiment because putin promised him that if russia defeated ukraine, then hungary would receive ukrainian lands that are not populated by vegs, and they want the same thing. in moldova wants to stabilize the situation, of course moldova wants to have good relations with the hungarians , but if i were the minister of foreign affairs, i would expel them from the territory of the young people because they interfere in our internal affairs, they incite separatism , and they don't go to google transnistria because of that that this is uh, officially, they do not have the right to go there without the permission of the ministry of foreign affairs, but uh, they are in this, they now support gogun separatism. thank you, we are

against narrow separatism of any kind separatism, we are for a united moldova, the ukrainian official position. well, our civilian position. to anatoliy, the last question about the military depots in the sausage is 2 km from the ukrainian border. what is the amount of weapons there ? the russians said that they had mines and could detonate them at any moment. is this possible? provocation there well, in principle, we lack weapons now, we have few weapons , of course, all ammunition is ukrainian, the armed forces would need as many provocations as possible in the sausage shop, i am asking for these warehouses there , they collected weapons, ammunition, eh artillery shells from all over europe there are still pre-war pre-war production ones and nobody knows what condition they are in, they are not the most new, the most new, they are probably 40-50 years old , and the fact that russia is fueling this conflict

around these warehouses is again and how is it customary for them to simply blow up the fire? i watched the news. when these military warehouses exploded in russia and they didn't have them, they exploded for 2 days. there, these fireworks were not what they were taking, and when a warehouse with fertilizer exploded, it lit up for a second. blew up and destroyed half a city, they can't explode. everything and all at once in one second, and half of moldova and a quarter of ukraine is carried there because it is very, very strong, and it cannot be increased because transnistria will suffer first if this is the case, they are definitely looking for an ancestor, because these warehouses have always been a proposal for russia to contain its military content . in 908, the united states began negotiating with the united states

to withdraw the private part of this weapon . equipment in order to travel, this is an explosive unit for 3 million euros, then according to those , or dollars, according to those times. well, then russia came up with it, because according to our agreement, we moved these warehouses to russia, this is not the property of moldova, this is not the warehouses that were occupied by russia but now it is possible to just leave them alone so that because of this idiots can simply blow it up in order to find someone there to create such a precedent and put all the blame either on the moldovans or on ukraine ukraine does not want get it warehouses because it is necessary for half a year or a year to understand what is there and then all this

is tested to verify whether it is possible to use them or not i do not represent sharp for transportation for use anatoliy shalar, the minister of defense of moldova in 2015 and 2016 thank you andriy reva joins the minister of social policy of ukraine in 2016-2019 p andriy, we are glad to see you on the espresso broadcast. good day to everyone. let's talk about compensation for lost housing, we are asking all the heads of regional administrations communities, what is the situation? well, of course, it's already billions of hryvnias, the damages, which uh, well, you can't even estimate, because every day more destroyed objects of uh, civil infrastructure are added since the last one - this is zaporizhzhia , today's night strike there, unfortunately , has only increased to three victims - this is a five-story ordinary residential five-story building where people live. well , the verkhovna rada passed a bill on

compensation specifically for damage and destruction of housing, and you have already seen how it will work or whether this resolution is already working and what is the level of the budget that will be involved, what kind of money, because it has been accepted, i understand that it must be signed and made public, but talk about the fact that compensation will be paid to people. it seems to me that for the sake of it, first of all , the sources should be very clearly defined, remember to pay people you understand very well that with the insane deficit of the state budget, which we currently have, we have to pay the state budget for compensation for housing, as a result of the general limit occupied by the occupants, well, that was it. the ukrainian budget, even if it will help him with regard to the sources of those to be collected from the aggressor, it will be possible

to do it only after the war, therefore, practically in favor of this law, i see you, well , it will be possible to record the losses. so we understand why and we ask you or people were told that we will return everything to you. we will compensate you for everything. please, take action. come in, register everything, take photos . well, don't you think that this is some kind of deception, because then you have to say frankly. well, as it is. well, you know that we have no money. the budget is being prepared. let's win, then we'll count, then we'll look and not encourage people, because some have opportunities , some don't, some are just waiting, you see, they 've been using the methodology for a long time when it's just mt, what should be done in the future well, if you take, for example, such an example as pension savings, we tell now we will have an accumulation system, in 20 years you will receive a pension or you will not receive

a pension because we will not be there or 20 years we promised you and the next one let them think about how they will do the same applies to compensation. you put everything into action, which means fix it, then when it’s the grandfather’s turn to be paid , it’s obvious that it’s up to someone else to decide. the entire current policy is built on this. the results when they simulate turbulent activity. and at the exit, people actually receive only promises and nothing to andrii well, let's talk about pensions from the first of march, that is , from yesterday. differed from the previous wells. almost all categories of ukrainian pensioners. how much money did they receive now? they will keep it, that is, from next month they will receive

it as a pension. please tell us about it. you remember us then, everyone quarreled because everyone expected that they would fight a european war, then i explained to people that the main thing we did in 2017 was to launch the mechanism of annual indexation of pensions, it is enough to say that in 2017 in 2008, indexation, more precisely, pension modernization was carried out for 10 years. imagine that people in 2008 appointed a pension for 10 years . this pension was practically not updated, but every year pensions were awarded to people with the same length of service and the same salary. the difference, in principle , reached several thousand hryvnias. and here we are, and when we came to power, 9 million pensioners out of 11 had little the same in principle the same in principle because they were brought up to the subsistence minimum, it was practically minimal and when we canceled eh by the way

there was such a terrible thing as a tax based on the principle of 15%. people paid tax on pensions to customs when we conducted a full-scale review of pensions, that is, their modernization, and the main thing, as he said in this reform, is to launch a mechanism for annual pension renewal, from that time, from the moment of adoption of this law to today . the fifth indexation of the pension, and two indexations were carried out during our division, and already the third indexation, which should be carried out , and the fourth, which should already be carried out by this government and we said then that the most important thing is that, regardless of what it was, people with the lowest incomes of pensioners should receive an increase annually, so that these are not gifts, and what good operations raised pensions and these bad ones were not raised before that, nor should a legislative mechanism be launched annual increase

of the pension, and we defined this mechanism as a formula where 50% of the previous inflation level is taken from the previous one and 50% increases in the average salary, if the country has low inflation, then there is no need to raise the pension people no, if wages grow, then this indicator increases pensions more, if there is more inflation in the country, less wage growth , then there is a compensation for those losses, so last year, the official inflation rate was 26% , that is, people lost their construction capacity by two. well, practically by a quarter and an eye all conversations must be supported, business must be thought of, how to help entrepreneurs, they are absolutely worthless, all these programs 579 there are tax exemptions, they do not solve the main issue, they do not solve

the issue of how to implement small and medium-sized enterprises business, the goods and services they produce. therefore, they work for pensioners. they work for people who are not very wealthy, and if the purchasing power of these people falls accordingly, the business that serves them is also not all losses, and finally, after a year of war, the green government came to this understanding. well, not in in full, but it came, remember how they told me 5% increased - we can increase it there is another way, they generally wrote in the law about the state budget that the government has the right not to carry out indexation at all, that is, violating the constitution, and the constitution forbids the bill, the budget, to make changes to other legislative acts, they defiantly violated, cynically allowed the government not to carry out indexation and then said, well , we are carrying out the condition, you can praise us for how well done they are. i think they should not be praised, they should be asked why they stole in 2020 pensioners have two months, and why was the resolution adopted today on february 24, friday, that is

, from march 1, pensions must be paid on february 24 , only the ministry of social policy managed to prepare this resolution it means that on saturday and sunday, instead of resting, people in the pension fund worked transferring pensions to our pensioners so that they would receive increased pensions on time . tell andrei, but let's talk about pensions later. is it enough? well, if inflation is 26%, as you said, official, not even unofficial. i think more indicator, we add to pensioners how much there is, well, the minimum pension was 200-200 in my opinion, and now plus 300 uah they receive this is a sufficient amount in your opinion plus in fact in fact if brothers according to the uniform calculation what did they do, they secreted the growth rate of the average salary for the year, that is, they published inflation of 26%, so we subtract 13, and they keep the average salary rate for the country secret, but

if you add 6.7% to 13. therefore, you will get 19.7 - this is the increase factor, which they set to multiply by 2, somewhere on the order of 14% , the average salary increase in the country for 2022, but for some reason they published this figure according to our calculations, it is more, we calculated that there should be an increase in pensions by at least 24%. well, they saved 5%, i understand, and now they are talking about a great achievement, it did not fully compensate for the losses people suffered in the previous year, but it is better than nothing or the 5% that they proposed to do. i want to remind you that when they adopted the budget in the first reading, there was no the pennies for increasing the pension are not foreseen and only when they adopted the budget they wrote 40 billion there. and now the ministry of social policy is telling us that for carrying out full sanctions , i.e. 72 billion uah, i have a simple question . well, did you not understand that you will index

it was not possible to put this amount into the budget for pensions right away, after all, you ended up with this very figure, why are there all these maneuvers of conversation , you know it’s called piles of goat-prodaikoza, we will not dictate those people there, their mood will drop and then they will say well, good for you we will give 5%, but it is not enough. well, let's live. we will give you twenty percent, right somewhere. but in reality, people were not compensated for what they lost, the truth is the living wage, to which the pension and other payments and taxes are tied. now how real is the living wage in our country? the minimum is fixed official because uh well, we understand that they are not starting from the official subsistence minimum, official look we have six indicators of the subsistence minimum, i am general and there are different demographic groups, we are interested in the size of the initial minimum and it concerns disabled persons, that is, pensioners, state on

january 1, 2023, it is 293 uah, 293 for the past year, it has increased by 150 uah a little bit , it has increased by 150 uah now, when the indexation is being carried out. of the fund he predicted the indexation of this indicator for pensioners by 19.7%. that is, realistically, they will add 243 uah to 500 uah, and their pension will be somewhere around 2500 uah. we can’t hear well. please make the sound a little louder for us in the studio. andriy , repeat how much the pension will be, because i didn’t hear . sorry, multiply 2093 uah by 1,197

and so on. it is 2,505 hryvnias. they will have 2,505 hryvnias from the first of march. now we have people who receive it. i will now tell about those people who do not have full insurance experience. and there are people who have full insurance experience. their salaries were very small, and their minimum pension was calculated not from the subsistence minimum, but from the minimum wage, so our minimum wage was 6,700 uah this year, which also means that their pension amounted to 2,680 uah per month, while those 2,093 these 2,680, so if you multiply it by 1,197, then their pension comes out to 327 hryvnias, but they did not contextualize it , as they say, they made a whole

there, a whole, a whole. they finally remembered people because last year there was a complete failure for these people, for example, for people who were given a pension of uah 80 for a year, in war conditions, there are a million citizens, all sorts of judges, prosecutors, different judges, for example, can 200,000 uah receive a pension, is this a problem or not to what extent this is the decisive amount that is paid for special pensions, please let's say about the judges right away , in our country they always like to point fingers in court, judges do not receive pensions, judges receive a lifelong maintenance decision if you do not want to retire pension appointed on general grounds, if they retire, they are paid a lifetime stipend, almost in the amount of the judge's remuneration, they did not receive it, this was provided for by the entire reform of the court in previous times and in order to

encourage judges to retire so that they, well, not retire, but retire they were retired, this mechanism was made, get this money, their children are less than 1,000 people throughout ukraine, they influence what but pensions are the principle that people's deputies of ukraine and civil servants receive about scientific-scientific-technical activity about service in local self-government bodies, we did not index their pensions because the conditions for granting them a pension were benefits , for example, you must work for 35 years and in order to receive 40% of your salary you must have insurance 40 years of experience, and these people until 2015 were civil servants for 20 years, i.e. civil service , received 90% of their earnings, that is, they had to work to have a special experience than

ordinary citizens, and they received a pension 90% of why did we not index them, the pension was according to the general law and 90% of these people were indexed, there were 22,000 people with high pensions left, so with 1x to index the pension unfortunately, the connection is not very good andriy reva, minister of social policy of ukraine in 16-19 years about pensions from spices vadim valko already with us lawyer of the anti-corruption center member of automaidan higher anti-corruption court their pensions are not lifetime pensions, so we have anti-corruption activities , now your evaluations are the results of the work of the higher anti-corruption court. i congratulate you. well

, regarding the work above the anti-corruption court , the court has been working since september 2019, that is, for 3.5 years the anti-corruption court almost administers justice, during this time we already have more than 100 verdicts, most of these sentences of the accusers in most cases are given real prison terms, there are already sentences there of 10 years and nine years in prison with the confiscation of all property, more than 20 court decisions concern judges who took bribes, and these judges are likely. if all these sentences do not take legal force, they will not have the right to life imprisonment in the future, because these are intentional crimes, the only problem so far is that that there are no sentences for what we call top officials, such well-known names who were in the highest anti-corruption court there, starting with the same former head of the fiscal service there, nasirova expert onyshchenko with

the famous case of judge chausa with banks well, and there are about 20 such cases, out of those there are 200, where the surname is known, well, the whole country really knows, and these cases were heard at the time when detention was taking place there, so far there are no verdicts in these cases, but in some of them, the court is already approaching the final stages of stage of the debate, that is, all the evidence of the interrogation of all the witnesses has been examined, and i think that this year we have just seen the first verdicts in those cases, which are usually called the top cases, mr. vadym well , comment now, the hottest topic is a preventive measure for the ex-head of naftogaz ukraine's andrii kobolev, the day before the appeals chamber, it was the wax that was appointed by the first instance, he was not arrested and did not have a preventive bail. the west was not chosen, but here , on appeal, they gave an arrest with the right to bail for as much as uah 229 million for this, apparently, in his opinion, er, in the opinion of

the sap, he was not entitled to the award and immediately in social networks, it’s just a war for and against kobolev and israel against the court. they used to say that he is honest, impartial and fair. finally, we created him, now everyone started at the same time, not all part of the half that started for kobolev to accuse the court of bias, your assessment of this story from this situation, they bailed on such a big request, and the only thing that was not chosen for him was the arrest of the bail, they chose only the bail. that is, it is a much easier preventive measure than they would have chosen detention in custody, which was not there in the decision - there was no appeal decision there is only a pledge, the amount of this pledge is equal to the difference between uh, again, according to the version of the anti-corruption prosecutor's office, the amount of the premium that koboliv was entitled to receive and the amount by which he did not receive this difference in principle now determined that it is 200 as a deposit. well, almost 230 million uah is carried by this deposit, so what if this deposit is not made within five days

, the anti-corruption prosecutor has the right to re -submit a petition and ask for another preventive measure, it can be either house arrest or night house arrest or detention on alternative bail , okay. well, your assessment is how objective it is, so to speak, an unbiased decision, since choosing a preventive measure is, in principle , the initial stage of the criminal prosecution of a person, so we can say now that there is a suspicion, a suspicion is a well-founded assumption, and the court only said that this suspicion is well-founded, that is, there are certain signs to believe that there were indeed regulatory documents at the level of the cabinet of ministers and there was an award to kobolev, and there are well-founded assumptions that the amount of the premium does not correspond or may not correspond to this resolution and also here he said that there are certain risks, it is not obvious that if a preventive measure is chosen, then apparently the court considers certain risks, in particular, kobolev was forbidden to communicate with certain e-e

witnesses in criminal proceedings, but no one claims at the moment yes, that is, even the prosecutor's office does not say affirmatively yet, there is no indictment, the case does not go to court, suspicion is a well-founded assumption, that is, there really is a legal situation when mr. kobolev received the award, first the first part i wrote 10 million dollars in the future, the second part of the award is 12 million dollars, and the legislation has no restrictions . so it was not possible to receive more than a certain number of salaries per year, and here the question is not moral, but more about the legal restriction on the activity of nak naftogaz applied to the activity of the supervisory councils. well, i understand that the appeals chamber is three judges , colleagues decided that this resolution applied and chose this as a precautionary measure, but for now we cannot assert that there is an element of crime here, because it is only a preventive measure is the initial stage

, the pre-trial investigation will continue here, and as far as i know, a member of the supervisory board, for example, has not been charged yet, and it is obvious that this will happen there in the near future, that is, if did not violate the law of kobols, then this bail will be returned to him correctly. well, if in the event that he pays it and in the future the criminal proceedings will be closed, it is obvious that the consequence will be the return of the bail p . and some kind of demonstrative massacre, because in our country , well, among these first hundred years, we do not see any high-profile cases regarding top officials. 100 convictions, well, in principle, there is, for example, a former deputy minister. yes, there is a current people's deputy, mr. trukhin, who received a criminal record there, and well, in principle, he is recognized here, and he, of course, will pay 6 million

hryvnias for the armed forces, and wait. well, is this in the decision uah 6 million is this decision of the court, is it voluntary, is it a condition of the conclusion of the agreement by the anti-corruption prosecutor's office , is this the court's decision regarding mr. kopaev, well, it is still a legal fee, that is, it is obvious that we are not talking about any kind of bribery or such corruption. yes but since the article that incriminates this is 191, part five, well, in fact , there is the seizure of funds by abusing one's official position, then this is considered a corruption article , and well, this legal dispute is resolved in any right-wing state. yes, there are law enforcement agencies, there are prosecutorial agencies and there is a court that evaluates this decision further in principle. well, right away everything is transparent, he has already legally received these e-e prizes. you understand that this is a legal spirit. but is it corruption? we have many cloudy gray and black schemes from district and

regional administrations that stem from e- is the real repercussions are corruption, but we do not see these cases, well, regarding the ending , yes. if we say that, uh, there is a legal problem here , did he have the right to receive a bonus, obviously , did he have the right to receive a bonus in this amount, and did this not contradict the legislation ? it is precisely decided within the framework of criminal proceedings . well, the issue of corruption. is it the competence of the anti-corruption bodies? well, if you look at the investigation and the amount of this award, then it is clearly the competence of the national anti-corruption bureau and it is a corruption crime. according to that criminalized article, we cannot say now what the final result will be. yes, but when the pre-trial investigation will be completed. there can be only two finals , or the case will be transferred to court, accordingly , an indictment will be prepared or the criminal proceedings will be closed, for example, due to the absence of a composition or event of the crime, the pre-trial

investigation on the present moment is not finished , there is only suspicion, this is the initial stage of prosecution the fact that kobolev lives abroad and came to ukraine, well, allegedly on the recommendation of our western partners, and allegedly he was going to become the president's adviser on economic issues, or he was even being considered for the position of the next prime minister, and that's how he was invited here. i arrived and received my 229 million pledge . does the position of our western partners, who are quite loyal to the kovals and kovalev , affect the development of this story ? with regard to the direct trial, well, it is unlikely that international partners will influence the court itself, and the process there is quite long

, the investigation, for example, the defense side submitted e-e as their evidence, and e-e letters of the members of the supervisory board who at that time agreed to pay the bonus e-e to the employees of naftogaz including kobolev, but it is unlikely that it can be called any direct influence, that is, it is a legal criminal process, each party provides its evidence, the court evaluates them. corruption, a member of avtomaidan talked about the higher anti-corruption court and the first 100 verdicts of this court, it is almost 11:00 on the clock, there will be more news, we are waiting for the studio julika, the season is already anzhelika, thank you colleagues , unfortunately, there is sad news, because the number of people killed as a result of a russian missile strike is increasing

the enemy also fired at a residential building in zaporizhzhia in donetsk region and kherson region, but there is also good news because our defenders