[000:00:00;00] er, this is a terrible experiment when er, dishonest security forces control a huge territory, and the vaccination led to the fact that, er , russia is morally bankrupt. will it fall apart or not? i don’t know. maybe there is not, but everything piled up. i will be able to turn him into a kind human country where normal people can live, but the fact that i finished but the fact that you have an idea and are discussed mahon for it will not pass for sure . the editor-in-chief of the insider was on a live video call, our colleagues olena chabak and kostyantyn lichevskyi will continue the broadcast. mykyta mikhalilova and i say good night and see you , stay with us. take care

, we still live in that day, endless february 24 day after day month after month are full of pain and despair but you have to finish it there are weapons there is equipment there is a plan start a year from payment join the armed forces of ukraine a year ago i hugged you a year ago we were building our own future a year ago customs the tram was nearby, we listened to how a young man enlightens himself at night at the entrance, we listened to how the wind touches our hands, a year ago, a year ago, she and

you dream together, one for two, a dream of our joint victory , yours and mine, and then again the warmth of hands , trams without sirens, lovers at the entrance after our victory after our victory your blood can fight the ministry of health invites ukrainians to become blood donors every healthy adult citizen of ukraine or a foreigner with a residence permit can become a donor call to the blood center in your city to find out about the need or register at the moment on the platforms donor.ua or helsi.me and plan to the nation

today, dear fellow citizens, attention from us, important topics, interesting discussions, interesting, speakers, you are watching an informational marathon the only news channel continues its work, we are ukraine, well, we are in the studio, olena chabak , kostyantyn linchevskyi will shave a song for an hour, we are ready for that, we are ready to work so that you know more and we will not delay, we will immediately move on to important operational information the harsh policy of washington towards the white house, which at that time was headed by ronald reagan, contributed to the collapse of the ussr, polish president andrzej duda reminded his american colleague jubaiden of this during a meeting in warsaw. to the world, biden's visit to ukraine and poland is a signal

of us responsibility and washington's contribution to the security of europe and the whole world. well, let's remind you that the reagan nation doctrine is a document that recognized that there are brave people in the world who are ready to fight for their freedom if they are given american weapons to conduct training for them and provide them with intelligence data as well as financial diplomatic and humanitarian support they will be able to free themselves from russian soviet domination the result of this doctrine is the overthrow of many pro-soviet regimes and even the collapse of the ussr in this important and interesting at the same time topics we will understand further, and oleksandr motil will help us in this, american historian , political scientist, professor of political science at the university

rudgers in newark, new jersey good night, mr. alexander, we have a night and you have an evening. yes, thank you, thank you for the invitation and i congratulate you too . thank you for joining us. we want to compare the politics of two outstanding american presidents, reagan and biden. in your opinion , do they have anything in common? if there is what exactly, and then there are certain common things, there are quite a lot of such unrelated things, well, one and the other understood that there is a threat to the world, and this threat consists , well, in the soviet union and communism, so that understanding words for this is the russian federation and specifically putin himself. so there is a certain similarity here, both of them were ready to mobilize europe and , if possible, the whole world in this struggle against the soviet union, against communism from the side of reagan and against russia and the russian federation

, and then from the side of biden himself so here there is such a rather respectable similarity, similarities, er, dissimilarities consist in the fact that it is well , then it was true that russia was communist and we were talking not only about russia or the soviet union, but also about lyubov ivanovna communists idioms and practices in this world. now it is more about the geopolitical interests of ukraine, the geopolitical interests of america in the fight against the impulsist intentions of the soviet union, the sums of the russian federation. mikhail gorbachev also came to power. and this is a huge difference between korobochov putin, although he remained a communist for a long time, perhaps until 1989 -

1990, but at least he was ready to talk. he wanted a discharge, even though he wanted. well implementation of perestroika, realignment of property, and so on, and in some way what putin is going to do. just the opposite, he is strengthening the situation with the fascist regime and so on. then there are some other components and other factors. well , of course, as you understand, i am combining the afghan war with the ukrainian war well, to a certain extent - this is an important comparison, but let's not forget that the soviet union was in afghanistan for only 9 or 10 years, and during all this time, only 13-14 thousand soviet soldiers died in ukraine, on the contrary, every month

an average of 13-14 thousand russian soldiers, so the ukrainian war is much more critical, it affects the system much more and is much more prone to the fact that it can lead to the collapse of the russian federation. the afghan war accelerated these processes and did not cause the ukrainian gooseberry war, but the russian-ukrainian war can even cause this kind of breakdown of russia, mr. oleksandr. and what has grown up to uh, some scientists, studying the activities of reagan's politics, said that he had exactly one task, and that was the collapse of the soviet union. does biden face such a task as the collapse of russia? more likely, no, it means that somewhere in the american political community, it was avoided, which would very much like this, but

there are others who are quite skeptical about such a scenario, and i have the impression that biden belongs to that of the second group means that he is ready to help ukraine as much as necessary, he is ready to weaken even the very russian federation, and of course i think he would like to remove the same putin, but in general, america is dominated by such the mood that a weak russia would be good and good, hmm and hmm, but if they thought that russia had fallen apart, then people are a little afraid of it and they still need to be convinced that this is inherent in such a way that the truth is the inevitable result of putin's policies, and secondly, that it is actually not even so very bad, either for america or here, even for the russians themselves, it wouldn't be too bad

. so here we still need to work a little and talk with people to convince them that this is a good scenario, mr. alexander, here we are talking about the reagan doctrine. is it possible to wait? similar to the doctrine from biden. if so, what can it consist of? well, you understand . biden is ready to support countries that oppose russia, but not the most important thing here . actually, they supported countries and regimes that oppose the soviet regime, so if i'm not mistaken, correct me. i did not consider the schedule of the ussr in the reagan doctrine. of course, he was afraid of his communism and wanted to remove the communist regime in the third world and, if

possible, in eastern europe as soon as possible. it would also be nice to say that the communists were from the soviet union itself. and they didn’t talk about the fact that you, the soviet union itself , collapsed, so to speak, it happened partly because of the policies of reagan himself, to a large extent because of the policies of gorbachev himself, in fact, in my opinion this crisis which not only accelerated but even led to the collapse of the soviet union, let's not forget it was a communist totalitarian system and although gorbachev can be blamed for wanting to democratize somehow and improve a in the same way, he actually undermined my foundation of this system, and reagan helped him somewhat, of course, and the pope helped him somewhat. so there were various factors that

influenced this event. but in any case , the most important thing for reagan was the repetition of communism itself. and now there is no longer any ideology here. i am just fascist russia , which is trying to restore some of its imperial borders. so, it is more about geopolitics and about such strong concrete interests of america itself and europe itself of ukraine and so on, alexander, too, biden, not reagan, putin, not gorbachev, then maybe joe biden will go further, i mean, under certain conditions, he will set the task of the collapse of russia , what do you say? and it is quite possible. over the last year, the europeans have changed their foreign

policy and attitude towards ukraine and russia by almost 180% , the americans have changed their policy by approximately 90%, so that incredible and fantastic changes are taking place in the behavior of logic and formation of the interests of the west itself and although now mainly western leaders well, what about macron to a certain extent, even the british prime minister and let's say to a certain extent sand biden, they are somewhat skeptical about the possibility of disintegration, but it will all depend , of course, on the circumstances in ukraine and wars, eh. i am personally convinced that this disintegration will happen, that it will happen inevitably , not because the americans want it or not, or because the ukrainians want it or not, but because putin started

it. he himself brought it to the end to the possible and to the truth similar end of the russian federation so that what is happening before our eyes is happening without ukrainians as such or americans as such making any special contribution so that if this is if this lord of a certain a may even go full measure inevitable sooner or later western letters will say aha they will also see everything and their intelligence will explain it and the more they will see on the battlefield what is happening and they themselves will then come to the conclusion that this is happening that it is probably inevitable and then the question is how is it somehow how is it well well how adapt some political measures so that this disintegration is as peaceful and calm as possible, and so on. and it can happen this year, it can happen next. well , it can also last longer, but in principle

, all this is happening before our eyes and we are somehow not the current year or time is similar to the 88th. maybe in the 89th, maybe even in the 90th year of the soviet union, the system is falling apart . and even if we want it, we don't want it, it is falling apart simply because such a system could not, the then soviet system could not and co-exist with democratization, and putin's current system cannot coexist with a war against ukraine. because ukraine still exists and will win. in the end, mr. oleksandr will win . we are now talking about the figures of the american presidents. in his speeches, reagan appealed to the citizens of the soviet union, he called on them to pray for

them, and at the same time, quote, he called the center of evil in the modern world this year, when biden visited poland. he also appealed to the russians and he said that he does not want to fight with them, don't believe this president . in your opinion, the west does not wish you harm. did a transformation take place in russian society after the soviet legacy? your observations are what are in the heads of those people, oh representatives. this is a difficult question , as you know. based on population polls, at least 50% may be more supportive of putin's policy, well, sometimes they say that it is 70, maybe even more percentages, but let's assume that there are certain exaggerations here. so you know this relatively a large part of the population, at least half , then a certain part, let's say, has

a neutral attitude, a certain part has a negative attitude but if there were not, you know, 50%. it is you relatively much, she has hope, well, at the same time, i hope, but the main thing is that this hope , which, well, i hope is based on certain certain knowledge of theory and history, that it must change, this attitude towards war and towards the journey itself is changing and must change if there was no e- it's possible that people don't answer, so people still react to when their parents, brothers, and sisters die if the ukrainian the statistics are correct. and i am inclined to believe that they are correct. approximately 150,000 russians have died from this in just 13 months. you understand, well, these are fantastic numbers

. in afghanistan, from 9-10 years ago, 13-14 soviet soldiers died. i already mentioned this that the contrast is huge well, i completely understand you, er, the fsb is not a power structure, strong people are afraid of people who are zombified to some extent , maybe even to a great extent, but sooner or later the russians themselves will understand that this is suicide, that this is suicide. and if the russians do not will understand well, at least their representatives in the political and economic elites already understand this, because on the basis of the fact that the russian analysts themselves are respectable , which means they speak. there are already certain already visible cracks among those elites , so it is sooner rather than later, well, of course, we hope that it would be sooner, but if there were not even the russians, even the most

zombified russians would come to some conclusion that something is wrong here, and here of course it is very important that ukraine continues its successes on the battlefield even if they are minimal, if they had not been in the last few weeks or months, they would be to restrain russia and then go on a counteroffensive and thus prove even to russia and the russians that there will be no success here and even even the most withdrawn russian will rather ask himself this later and who led who created such a situation, why are we fighting for nothing , why are we losing, why are our boys dying, and then they , together with the elites, could then also turn the tide and somehow undermine the authority

of putin himself, oleksandr, regarding afghanistan wanted to continue the topic, it was already said that afghanistan became a catalyst for the collapse of the soviet union, and i heard at least two points of view regarding the influence of the withdrawal of american troops from afghanistan on putin's decision to invade ukraine, well, one point of view influenced the second, no, it did not, these are completely parallel stories in which do you agree with the point of view that putin's decision to invade ukraine strengthened biden's decision to withdraw troops from afghanistan? i would say that it influenced this decision, but in principle it you already understand the decision. it derives from his attitude to ukraine itself, to the so-called minsk processes, but most importantly to ukraine , to the ukrainian people, to ukrainian history , to ukrainian statehood, as you know , it is purely negative, he denies the existence

of legitimate all those types of ukrainian identity and he has come, he has already come of course before the decision that it was necessary to make some kind of military intervention that in the summer of the last , well, the penultimate year . of the border of ukraine if already then uh, as i know, he himself made this decision to some extent, some of his closest allies were just as damaged as many western observers, they did not expect this, in any case, they did not expect such a large-scale large-scale war. so this decision it is necessary to look for it in his ideology, in his attitude towards ukraine, in his policy towards ukraine, which is also important . an important factor here is the fact that it was not

successful during the orange revolution he didn't succeed during the maidan, he didn't succeed either, of course, but he certainly succeeded in seizing crimea and part of donbas, but he didn't succeed in creating a coup in ukrainian in kyiv. well, by the way , he didn't succeed the third time either. and i think that here we have to look for other words, politicians, failures, at the same time, a certain geological geological approach to ukraine itself, to the restoration, to the need to restore the great soviet e-e russian federation, the great russian empire, and then take all these factors together that pushed him to a certain conclusion of course, when he watched when he watched how the americans, well, somewhat scandalously escaped from afghanistan, he was certainly

possible and convinced that there would not be any special reaction from the americans or from the general side in the general event. and in this way, there will be no negative consequences here, the only thing that is necessary do it, attack, capture in two or three days and set up your own regime in kyiv, but this is of course already . probably summing up we still have a couple of minutes uh i'm going to have a long quote now but i'm going to read it anyway it's a shame to see because most of my life i've been a republican i grew up in the 80's when the republicans supported reagan and when he called the soviet union is an evil empire for me, it is simply unbelievable that so many republicans now do not want to oppose russian imperialism and aggression, at the same time they want to take a hard

position towards china, these are the words of max booth , a columnist, washington posts, a historian , a military historian of the american writer how did it turn out, mr. oleksandr, we have a minute and a half that in the end the republicans are just for a softer position towards russia , well, you understand, here you have to distinguish the republicans in general from the trumpian republicans and it is mainly this radical faction and their total in the house of representatives of which 10- 15 at most 20 people who are ready to cut off altogether well, cut all aid to ukraine, but you know those crazy presenters, what kind of people are they, so in principle that's all well, i don't know, maybe 5%, maybe 10% of all

those representatives, this is not a large group of people of course, for various political reasons, they want to make some kind of trouble. baidy is new because baidy supports this or that in ukraine, this or that. in america itself , of course, they will try to do everything to give him something here. well , as i said. i am quite sure and many american analysts share the opinion that aid should be reduced, but first of all, the republicans do not want it, and secondly, even if they wanted to, they would not be able to do it, because they are not a solid block , you understand, there are those extreme people who in general against, but there are very few of them, and there are others there who are conservatives, there are a little more radical, but they also consciously understand that russia is a problem of the russians, such problems are a threat to this world, and this also means to america, and you can go by overview, they share

the further opinion of the reig himself ours is the interior of evil, they may not say it out loud in public, but i am quite convinced that the republicans somehow believe in this, and in the end putin himself helps them, because every time there is some kind of fatigue towards ukraine or some such critical attitude is there any desire at all? well, it can be reduced, something in that council can go away, always then putin creates some kind of regular er there and then er-er some kind of training and some er-er some attack on the civilian population and then the whole world is horrified by the atrocities that putin himself acts in such a way that putin convinces americans themselves, even skeptics, that this is really an evil empire, mr. oleksandr. thank you for this conversation, for your analyst oleksandr motyla

, american historian, political scientist, professor of political science at rudgers university in newark new jersey was just in direct contact with us, and regarding russian attacks on civilian objects on the russian missile attack on zaporizhzhia, our response will be both military and legal , the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi emphasized this in his address, he also stated that the russian occupiers will inevitably feel our strength. i wish you good health , dear ukrainians. a brief world about today. i just spoke with the president of brazil. a useful conversation. we are renewing contacts between our states at the highest level. i informed about russia's attack against our people about the killing of children about strikes about our civil infrastructures thanked brazil for supporting our resolution on peace and territorial integrity for ukraine discussed diplomatic efforts capable of

stopping russian aggression and restoring peace to our country, the region and the whole world, in particular international efforts to implement our peace formula today spoke with the president in switzerland - this is our first conversation with the new president, he thanked for the package of support for ukraine for our people, they discussed the future bilateral cooperation and possible interaction on international platforms, i heard that switzerland is interested in implementing our peace formula, this is a very good signal, the stake meeting was held purely on the front and security situation , the general report was made by the commander-in-chief , there was a detailed intelligence report from specific combat directions from the commanders of the groups of our troops, in particular, the occupier is inevitable will feel our power, the power of justice in every sense of the word, i want to thank all

our rescuers who sort out the night the rubble of the house, the entrance of which was destroyed by rockets, it was possible to save 11 people, more than 70 people received help, on the list of the dead at this time, two people were helped, my condolences to the relatives of the wasps in odesa, a report on the situation in the southern direction, in particular, as it relates to preson and kherson region. of course, we do not ignore the north of our country, the border , the commanders understand perfectly well that their task is to do everything to suppress the fire of terrorists and constantly work with partners to increase the long-range of our capabilities, today signed several decrees regarding

awarding of our soldiers in total for this day 847 defenders awarded with state awards fighters of our mechanized brigades tankmen gunners marines intelligence officers of the air force special operations forces of terror defense national guardsmen of the national police border guards workers of the dbr and dsns for today the number of our defenders and how brave and effective were awarded with state