[000:00:00;00] a quote about crimea, too. last week , it was the strategy for the de-occupation of crimea, the time of the new edition, the order and means of de-occupation, political-diplomatic, military, economic, etc. requires a change of priorities. did you mean that this could mean that our tactics will change in some way? well, of course, we shouldn't talk about it live. why shouldn't we talk about it? look, i'm leaving. i'm leaving. from the situation in the modern world, you cannot hide anything, my position regarding crimea and other things is quite simple and clear, except according to the constitution of our country, this is our territory for the time being, until we change the territory of crimea, there can be no development of our country, period. that's why they are on today, the russians are proposing. the so-called minsk-3

is a very simple situation if there is an unresolved final issue on the territory of the country. keep in mind that the country will not have any development, not in the near future. do not believe what someone says about investments, someone will put money here, it’s just not, well, something that doesn’t correspond to reality, i can take moldova as an example , which the russian federation was in in the early 90s, the older ones turned around such a situation, created some incomprehensible entity called pms, how is it there it is called like this. keep in mind the development of moldova until it is united , there will be no second one, friends, there will be no result to have the development of georgia until that time . until it finally puts an end to its territorial issue, the same it concerns our country for the time until our borders are returned to the borders of the 91st year, which are enshrined in our constitution , and we will show it in the development of our country, the language

cannot be spoken, it will be understood by any person who understands what a state is, what borders are, and what such is the economy, and when they say that someone will save money in us, it will be so , but only after our victory, when we return the borders of 1991, because it is too risky to invest in a country in which at any moment the question of territorial integrity, this is exactly what i mean by the traditions of our studio guests. mykola knyazhytskyi, er, p. danilov , i absolutely agree with you. we have another example of bosnia, the owl games, where there is supposedly peace, but it is also obviously not developing as other countries in this region are developing because of this conditionally separated, but i wanted to ask about something else, it is obvious that we all believe in victory, that we answered our territories, it is obvious that in war it is impossible to predict, but from your point of view, is such a situation possible when we are recapturing our

territories, but the war continues, we are liberating them, but there is still a constant battle on our borders, peaceful territories are shelled, people continue to leave, planes do not fly , ports are blocked. still, if it succeeds, then russia will not do this, and there is some way to stop this war can this war even after the conquered territories continue, what you are saying is not a victory, this is not the end of the war, these are completely different things, this is the continuation of military operations on the territory of our country until then , until we remove the threat posed by the russian federation . the responsibility of the fascist putin regime for the crimes he committed here, international responsibility

, the third - full compensation, satisfaction for everything he did here, and the fourth - these are guarantees of our security, but guarantees they must be absolutely clear to us, and we have an understanding that this is what we mean victory in any if any of these four points is not fulfilled well then this ee has a completely different name and then we will be with you in the extreme one more question to the complex and difficult situation of the states, but today there was literally a message from the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense that the russians are preparing a large-scale provocation against ukraine on the belarusian and russian borders in order to draw in the belarusian army directly into the conflict, they say. there is even a planned tv program with the participation of russian propagandists, what do you think about this? and especially in the context of even today's news that in belarus lukashenko

, the self-proclaimed president, led the possibility of the death penalty for the state for treason for the military and officials, could this mean that everything the belarusians will try not only the territory with their army, but also with their army to fight against ukraine, this is not an easy situation, you know that belarus is like three countries that are directly related to europe and belarusians, ukraine, moldova, but they have a completely different view of many processes, but we have a very difficult situation, a difficult situation that consists in the fact that today russia is occupied by the russian federation , which has been occupied for quite a long time. into a political occupation . well, will there be a military occupation , which is partial there today by 75 percent

? understanding, in the event that we have this as an additional front, we will have to divert our resources from attracting our military to solving these issues, whether we will solve this issue, we will solve it, and lukashenko clearly understands how it will end for him, but once again i emphasize the world in the last the time has come, such a turbulent process is a turbulent movement, and this is a certain additional challenge for us . i emphasize once again. if such a decision is made , i understand that not everyone will agree with them, but there is a part of those people who or some of those people who are under oath and we can skip that part of them can take part in all issues for us, this is once again your additional call, but here we can uh talk about uh a little bit of other things so that everything has to be stopped in time if

we say that this is the president of the undetermined republic, yes , how do we emphasize it publicly, that's what i have a question about. and how does it happen that such a long period of time, that borders work , the country lives, but in countries that held elections that were not recognized by the whole world, you know, that's all necessary do it on time, that's my position that if you don't do it on time, then this thing will catch up with you, you will make much more efforts to solve these or other issues . there would have been an immediate execution of dana, instead of negotiations, some would not have exchanged it for some things, maybe we would have had a completely different world in the 14th year, when there was an aggression against our country in the crimea, when the russians started a war on the territory of donetsk and luhansk regions. well examples it's already been like this, unfortunately, well, these so-called compromises lead to negative consequences

, if you compromise today, keep in mind that the negative consequences will definitely catch up with you tomorrow, the day after tomorrow. and here is one more question regarding these so far opinions and assumptions about belarus. and what and how will ukraine respond if the belarusians try to attack our borders with their troops, because it is known that now, despite the fact that aircraft of the russian federation are based at the airfields of belarus basing there , including those mobilized and the training of those mobilized from russia on the territory of belarus . ukraine has never struck. can this situation change when the belarusian army tries to attack our borders? or other practical actions, we understand how our troops should act, how

our units of the defense forces should act and what we should do, we have a scenario for any case of events that today may expect our country and it's not only belarus, you know that the russians have a great desire to shake up this situation in moldova so that we also have a common border in order to distract our troops, well, look , the enemy is insidious, that's what i said when we started conversation with you, what do you think that everything is fine with us , that we have won and everything can calm down, this is a very, very dangerous thing , in addition to danylo, there is information that soon there will be a meeting of the national security and defense council of ukraine, at which decisions should be made regarding those who inside the state that is carrying out things that threaten our country. can you tell me more about this? who does it concern ? what sanctions will there be? what will happen

? share with us. everyone has to pay taxes. and if you have the honor of working on the territory of our ukraine, it should be mandatory, especially when it comes to wartime. when you think that you are smart and you will not obey the laws in our country, this will not happen, and in the near future you will see the presidential decree, according to the occasion, our audience is curious about who you are, but as i understand it, the surnames will not be before the meeting of the national security council, and mr. kovalchuk wanted a question . good evening. good evening to everyone. oleksiy vyacheslavovych. please tell at the moment, we already know something about the situation. but maybe you can also reassure ukrainians about the situation at the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, we know that recently the power lines were cut again and

the plant was working on generators. as far as i know i understand now. ukrenergo has informed that it has reconnected the station, the danger has passed again. please tell me how much you have. can you report the situation or similar threats can still continue in the future? i understand that they are repeated from time to time and ukraine tries to return it under control, despite the fact that, unfortunately, megate did not get full access when it came to this object, what is the situation in a nutshell, this is this object, it's been a year since the nuclear facility has been in the hands of terrorists dangerous - dangerous. you have it in the hands of terrorists, and when you point out that the store had capacity, i have a question . and then what do you want to do, then what about the un ? fight back against the terrorists. well, look, this is quite a simple, not difficult question, but

the lives of tens of hundreds of millions of people are at risk, if god does not come, something will happen at this station, that's why i say that the world's reaction to all the processes that are taking place, this is uh, we are pushing the terrorist countries to continue doing what they are doing. thank you, if there are no more questions in our studio , we will not delay you either. oleksiy danilov, secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine, glory to ukraine, in the comments, please write your thoughts , questions, and likes to this video, it is important for us . more people will be able to see this broadcast, please now for the miner, the first question is a difficult, difficult day, a difficult morning for the whole of lviv oblast, in fact, today we were remembering

when, unfortunately, one moment, well, during the rocket attacks, so many people died. today again five civilians who in general lived their lives completely as how did you meet today and what do you think is connected with today's such nocturnal activity of russian missiles well why exactly today i have my opinion we can discuss today the birth of our kobzar taras shevchenko putin and that's all that happened, all these terrorists they love symbolic dates and today count how we all ukrainians started this day we started it at 2:35 if i'm not mistaken the anxiety that lasted seven hours and in the lviv region became colossal a tragedy because five people died, i want to say the next thing. i really like the words of oleksiy vyacheslavovich today. does he often perform in your studio? i have the opportunity to be here to listen to him

. i often listen to his interviews. i liked his messages his messages next we haven't won the war yet we are still far from winning let's get together let's work because really sometimes it seems that some political analysts are relaxing victory is close victory is not far away but in fact victory is very, very far away and we can talk about victory to speak only when the four points voiced to the president, which were voiced by oleksiy mechslavych, will be fulfilled , in order not to save time, i will not voice them again. therefore, we must gather now to work, of course, there will be a lot of issues right now. the difficult situation in bahmat is difficult now. moldova, on the other hand, has very complex geopolitical processes. political processes are taking place in georgia . the world is storming. bakhmut, we are talking about that, analysts are talking about the fact that within six to 8 months , the counteroffensive of the ukrainian army will begin, we understand

that weapons once flowed by kidneys on at the moment, it is already rika, and of the 100% of weapons requested by the commander-in-chief, according to official data, more than 40% have already arrived , and we understand that we are preparing for this decisive battle, but victory is still a long way off. therefore, we all need to get together , volunteer soldiers, politicians, for that to bring this aid as soon as possible, and today, of course, shelling, of course . well, again, there is a problem in the energy system, a tragedy in lviv oblast, and today again showed that we still need to work a lot and a lot so that we won this victory. well, they say that not everything is so good there. as far as i understand, even with the supply of weapons , it is obvious that we do not receive everything that is promised to us on time. and what can this indicate, that is, there are some problems with this, on the one hand, we see that there are also european countries and the united states of america constantly in their statements and quotes say that without

any support for ukraine, on the one hand, we are witnessing the fact that it seems that all such major strategic decisions have been made and the process of reading zelensky's visit to the united states the united states of america at the end of last year, later, the visit of baide in response, in fact, on february 21 of this year, all the ramsteins show that well, and especially i want to say the speech of the vice president of the united states of america , kamiliharis, at the munich security conference, where she directly voiced the official point of view of the united states of america she said that the united states of america accuses the russian leadership of the crime of genocide. well, she said that crimes against humanity are a crime of genocide, which means that any compromises are impossible with no one is negotiating with the architect of the genocide, but on the other hand, the dynamic of the supply of weapons to ukraine is real . well, it raises questions, on the one hand, the germans themselves

expressed their consent to give us tanks and gave the go-ahead for transfer from third countries, and then it turned out that they had two in operational condition there are no tank battalions, that’s 62 units, they need to be repaired quickly, that means it needs to be done, and the dynamics are actually not satisfactory right now, our political leadership speaks about it quite frankly, and danilov and the president of our country, i think that all this has to a certain extent, his explanations, eh, not at all denying the overall strategic decision in favor of ukraine, eh, we must understand that in america, i don’t take europe, there is an even more difficult situation there, and in the american political community and among american intellectuals , it is quite influential, i will not say that there is a very powerful and sufficiently influential current that believes that ukraine is a big sad that ukraine will defeat russia by military means even if america gives everything that ukraine asks for

and these people act accordingly in the american press, analytical reports are not only rennes corporation, there are many other analytical centers that serve the state department, they say that ukraine cannot win, it is too weak, russia has too strong a resource, it has an order of magnitude stronger there, and that is why we need to look for some points of contact, we need to look for some lines of compromise, and i will not say that the american official line accepts this point of view, but it is obvious that these influences are evident, these influences are, and i still believe that this is one of the reasons a on the second reason seems very correct to me, and i thank you. oleksiy danilov frankly said that the west really cannot

yet decide what to do with russia. the point of view is not to weaken russia and destroy it, but probably not all of this point of view has become the dominant official one, and therefore the west does not know what to do with russia, while there are influential currents that say that ukraine may not win, and there is such a slowdown and inhibition and it costs us it costs us it cost us the fact that we could not take active offensive actions in the winter, this still calls into question active offensive actions in the spring and now some are already talking about the summer all these things obviously they complicate the situation in russian - the ukrainian front and it seems to me that ukraine, first of all, our official factors have a full voice without any wrappings in er balls and all kinds of wrappers to say measures, the sooner you give weapons in the right amount, the sooner ukraine will win

on the battlefield, if ukraine wins on the battlefield, this with its participation will mean the disintegration of russia, it is not because we, who wants it, no, we want it , but because it is an objective process, the defeat of russia on the battlefield will inevitably cause the disintegration of russia and the west already now, together with ukraine, it must prepare for the scenarios of the emergence of new independent sovereign states on this territory, which is now called the russian federation, and there is no need to hide behind any such labels, you know, they repeat three things like mantras, china will benefit from this nuclear weapons will spread, and people even scarier than putin will come to power in russia, well, like how the bolsheviks came to power in the 18th year and after nicholas ii abdicated power, all these mothers and fathers understand that the fsb came up with things that are scarier than putin, but these mantras should simply be dispelled because they will only cost us more and more days, weeks and months, uh, struggle and war and new

victims sounds like some kind of justification, and in this context, i would like to do, you know, a step forward and a little back. that statements diverge from by anatoliy romanyuk, i would to some extent like to continue what taras said when the year began and we received a huge number of statements from western partners about how much the united states of america allocates and how much other european countries allocate, we were all immediately somehow comforted that we receive what is really necessary , what the army talks about a lot, what it needs, but time passes and we will not get it, i have the impression that, first of all, what was said, the united states of america does not have an answer for itself, but what will really happen if ukraine wins against russia

to some extent, it is possible that this was helped by one of the polls that was presented in western countries last week in our country, it was not carried out in the mass media, it was conducted by the opposition structure of russia, it conducted polling of five regions of russia on the subject of where do they want to be in russia do they want to leave and one of these regions is kaliningrad 72% of respondents said that they want to separate from russia and become independent e.e. siberia is a separate region about 62% expressed their desire to leave the survey was conducted on the internet , it was not representative, but there were more than 5 million people from those regions. that is, it was a fairly large group of people, and in connection with this , i have the impression that all those powerful solutions which were adopted, they can to a certain extent be considered as a form of pressure on trade with russia, you see what we promise to give

, you see the pictures that are available in an hour, how many tanks are worth, battleships of other equipment that can come to ukraine, let's move, let 's negotiate, let's do something, that is, there is pressure as well as us, there is pressure on russia to a certain extent. and precisely because we do not receive this equipment , there are even more suspicions that there is some kind of game on the part of some of the western partners in order to negotiate separately with russia . to negotiate at the expense of ukraine, from here there is and trump's interview, which says that i would give a part of the territory of ukraine and would manage the situation without it. that is, we have a lot of such messages coming from all sides, how should we be? i think that the position that

was expressed today at the beginning of the program is is our position, that is, our position consists of one thing, there are four principles, we agree on those four principles, we subscribe to them, and ukraine must ensure that they are fulfilled , because the war is taking place on our territory , our people are dying, and the whole of europe depends on the success of what ukraine will do and the whole world, and today it is no longer some language formula or some maxim that spreads from ukraine. it is recognized by many countries that the world depends on the result that will be in ukraine, so i think that the position which deals with it should be our joint position mykola knyazhytskyi your position and and what do you think and why so sharply possible sharply in the information field but nevertheless there a week or two ago, everyone was talking exclusively about support for ukraine, no problems , no negotiations, military support and now this rhetoric is about what mr. romanyuk

is talking about. well, in fact, things have changed, although all our rhetoric changes from week to week, but you know why right now, i wouldn't say that the rhetoric has changed a lot, it has always been supporters of trump, for example, in the united states of america or right-wing parties who took an openly pro-russian position were always far-right and left-wing parties in the same germany supported by russia, who also took a pro-russian position. i think that nothing has changed, but i would really hate to see it on russian television. they are very popular psychics fortune tellers and we are also very often fascinated by this, let 's look at things realistically, we say that we are ready for negotiations and who said that russia wants some kind of negotiations? i don't see such signals i see that russia wants to destroy us, that russia says all the time that it is repeating its idea of ​​nazification, demilitarization, recognition of new territorial realities, and then we will talk about something. i don't see that they want

any negotiations. this is the first and second. it is beneficial to him as and many people think that he is an i apologize for being an idiot with cancer i would never underestimate the enemy we are of course i would really like the black swan to fly tomorrow he gave in the end russia fell apart the day after tomorrow and we won and entered red square with blue and yellow flags. i would really like it, but if you look at the reality, well, we don't know if he is sick or not, you may remember that they once told about leonid danylovych that he had cancer when he was president there, he still is the most alive of all the living, it can continue as long as you like, again, the story of the lord of russia well, there is no data that russia will fall apart, this is a possible scenario that must be calculated and thought about, i completely agree with mr. taras, but there is no data that this will happen c with such success, it may not disintegrate, they can continue to make tanks at their factories, continue to make missiles and artillery, they can get them from korea, from

iran, from other totalitarian states, and this can continue as long as we want, and when we look at the realities of the realities of putin's rule , we don't know is he sick or not russia is not going to disintegrate they are going to destroy it the truth everything else is just hope and here the question is how should we act in such a situation there was an article today it is being discussed valeriya a baker with whom you can disagree on many things, there are a lot of theoretical things, but it is quite resonant, there are many completely sober thoughts, eh, the west will really support us when it sees that we are not only an example of courage and intelligence. and this is demonstrated by our army, our armed forces and it is an example of strong, high-quality democracy and responsibility if we work harder so that those opinions that finance russia there or are anti-ukrainian do not sound like that i, er, during my last visit here with vladyko borisov

for example, ukrainians in america are catholics, we know that biden is catholic, the catholic community there is very strong , so they are making great efforts to convince republicans who are catholics in a catholic environment that the point of view spread by trump is not just wrong, it is disastrous for the world and for the united states. and that ukrainians must be supported by each of us, but i know that oksana yurynets, for example, is engaged in advocacy, she travels, meets with politicians, she makes a lot of efforts, as well as many other ukrainian politicians and social activists who are fighting on their fronts, and therefore this struggle awaits us for a long time and we must approach it very responsibly without expecting that extra senses will remind us that tomorrow all our enemies will die and everything in them will fall apart oksana yurnets what are your feelings do you really communicate with a lot of people from abroad, are there any such, well, exactly. i will be very comfortable talking about

the fact. ukraine, poland, britain, for two days, representatives of the offices of the presidents and prime ministers and, accordingly, the politicians in office and those who represent us in the public and political sector. that is, we were looking for this formula, how to interact. when we are offered something, we we have to offer ours in return. it is good that the head of our nsdc clearly says that there is a diplomatic way. there is another way that our constitution dictates to protect our territory conditionally, including crimea, because in fact many of our partners have -is they help us, they are ready to help, they are also not ready for many cases and challenges, and it is good that, as of now, we understand that from the country's officials and things are coming as proposals, if you know how we don't want someone's peace plans, because these are not peace plans, they are someone's opinion, but instead we unite in the platforms of those countries that can help us and help us speed up. i

will say frankly what concerns tanks, we have heard that in history since being in kyiv and then even when testing with our military with wladimir klitschko, these tanks clearly says thanks to the fact that i am now, i undertake to do it faster, decisions must be faster because we are talking about speeding up victory because every day costs the lives and health of our soldiers and it is us we must unequivocally articulate very clearly today as regards the mechanisms, how it should happen, we must clearly understand that we, on our part , must also speak these formulas. colleagues said that there is something broken, something old, something unrepaired. and there must be an f-16. and maybe other more modern planes. our guys quickly learned that in addition to the fact that they study in germany, they study in britain, and there are a lot of people with whom we walked next to. today they have become super soldiers