[000:00:00;00] at dawn, the terrible result of the attack is visible, seven people were shot, among them an unborn baby, the bodies were taken away, the police investigated the crime scene and new evidence appeared, the police confirmed that they had received and ignored the information that the attacker had a firearm, although he was mentally unbalanced, this city is in mourning, the whole country in a shock that deepens with each new detail of the case and everyone has one question on their lips why is this all for today we are on the air again on monday at 21 take care i

feel chained to my chair everything it starts to get annoying, there is no convenient moment for pain, but there is yellow cream dolgit, cream dolgit helps to eliminate pain and has an anti-inflammatory effect. dolgit is the only yellow cream for joint pain, and for muscle spasms, dolgit antispasmodic tablets for muscle relaxation, and whether the ukrainian composition can miners to continue the football fairy tale and reach

the quarter-finals watch matches of shakhtar against penord and support our club exclusively on megogo there are moments when the body quickly loses fluid which can lead to dehydration when ordinary water is not enough yereo reo water for special medical purposes i save myself real i save children reo and i save myself reo reo water for special medical purposes good evening friends mykola veresen vitaly portnikov good health yes i did not get confused this time yes i am well done okay we are we will be with you for an hour and a half, even less than an hour and a half, let's start with the situation on the fronts, we will have a general of the armed forces

of ukraine first deputy commander of the special operations forces of the armed forces of ukraine from 16 to 19 years, ex-deputy secretary of the nsdc from 19 in the 20s so, serhiy kryvonos is in our program. thank you for finding time for us , mr. serhii. it's nice to see you on friday evening , when most people are resting. but someone has to work when most people are, mr. serhii, so let's start. glory to ukraine , glory to the heroes. let's start. you can see that despite the fierce resistance of the ukrainian troops, this is already the seventh month, it seems to me that it is a struggle for how to count one from may and the other from june well, it is shorter to leave him there he regrets that they are providing him with shells that this one is coming to inspect him, but they continue to attack right there. the central point is there, and the question arises. and how long can this continue and why do they do it, because many say that even the surroundings of bahmut, it automatically does not give opportunities to get

on these roads that lead to slavyansk or kramatorsk, yes, russia needs at least some small victory, and the victory that they expected from solidar was not presented in this way and was not perceived in this way. because solidar is a small town, it is a small town. not bakhmut at all, and that is why they need such a new putin stalingrad, which they want to show that they have achieved such crazy success, well, how do they plan to present it first of all for the world community , and secondly for their own community, because their own community eats everything they they don't give , they consume just like those cows consume grass . that's why they need a small victory. they are trying at any cost to squeeze us, squeeze us out of bakhmut

, and in the future, it is directly informative this is to be presented as a super victory, yes, mr. serhiy, but look, i just made a note here, there is the luhansk region, there is the donetsk region, there is the kherson region, and the zaporizhzhia region, in the end there is the kharkiv region , why exactly bakhmut, because i am so many, why there is an attack, why can’t there, there, there, in bakhmut's championship is unclear why. it's just that for everyone. every day, everyone is more and more interested in the very phenomenon of bakhmut. why did they choose it as the easiest road there, and not the avdiyivka , let's say yes, there is something nearby and it's not the easiest there, the biggest opposition of the ukrainians troops, and therefore it is not clear why they advance there, well, first of all, bakhmut is just a junction that leads to a direct road both to kramatorsk and directly to konstantinovka to slavyansk, and in the future this will allow, if the offensive of russian troops is properly organized, will allow to continue the offensive in

direction of pokrovsk, cut off our maryanivska avdiiv direction directly well , let's finish. the key to victory, as at one time it was the key to the summer offensive for us. it was kramatorsk. and again, the slavs, that's why they are trying to achieve at least something in order to develop the offensive in the future, because when they say about the offensive of the russian troops, it has not yet begun and the russians are all behind we talked about these battles of local significance, yes, they are heavy, they are bloody , but meanwhile these are still battles of local significance with heavy losses on both sides. i apologize, but it will begin in order to have an offensive.

the amount of manpower equipment, if all this is sent to bakhmut, it also applies to the ukrainian side , let's say, to a certain extent, yes, i agree, why? well, in fact, everyone is waiting for the offensive, and i said it correctly, vitaly . well, it allegedly started in january, and we are waiting for something. we are waiting, so here it is , and this offensive is already here, or whatever, there is no such offensive yet , the russian reserves are beyond the range of influence of our firepower at the front, and a huge number of groups of their reserves are in the voronezh area, so they are still i'm sorry, the leaders of the local battles are probing our defenses and are looking, after all, where will it be possible to increase the efforts to start an offensive in general, they have such a blue dream, you can say that this is an offensive from the russian side of the russian border past kharkiv in the direction of pavlograd, as well as from

sides of zaporizhia along zaporizhzhia in the direction of palgrad in order to completely surround our donetsk group, this is their such a blue dream, they need a certain amount of resources for this, whether they have resources or not, they will show it directly our scouts, but the fact that they have resources, how much they will be enough, this can be shown already in the future, no more , no less, so i would not be so super optimistic that they are expiring there , the human base, they have equipment, there is equipment, some say old old old for to even shoot down the t-34, which they brought a whole echelon there from laos, meanwhile, this tank is shooting in the direction of the ukrainians and can kill ukrainians absolutely calmly, and we also need to have trained and motivated armed with

at least rpg-7 and a certain number of grenades to he has weapons to knock down this t-34, therefore, even old weapons still kill people, this must be taken into account. and the ukrainian forces , well, because it has always attracted attention, there is no doubt that the president and the commander-in-chief are constantly in some kind of meetings discussing the situation around bakhmut from your point of view , mr. general, there is a need to be strong whether ukrainians are worried or just worried about this possible offensive, whether there are enough ukrainian forces to deter this offensive , time will tell whether it is enough or not enough, and well , in the war, no one will say whether i have are there any resources, because it will already be a game in favor of the enemy, but from my point of view, the question should have been asked directly to bakhmut three weeks ago, because we are also losing our strength and currently the battles are already going on in the outskirts

of bakhmut, and do we lose more than one person every day a dozen rather than a hundred people in these battles and whether it will be useful or not. if we have already directly thrown the guys of special operations there, i understand that the situation is repeating what happened in seyeverodonetsk lysychansk, we are now starting to hammer nails with a microscope whether it is necessary or not, it is better to save the special operations forces for the future offensive operations, it will be a much greater benefit, and in this situation we need to draw the right conclusions and improve the training of our infantry , and what is the logic in the general staff, which does well, he does not leave bakhmut, why then?

what is the reason for the discussion ? he does, unfortunately, our general staff is involved in political affairs and very often decisions are made not in favor of reasonable conduct of reasonable hostilities, and in favor of certain political dividends, see what the government's mistake was in the last years, well , practically a year, if not a year, then 7-8 months, when in we have already had success with regard to the liberation of chernihiv oblast, kyiv oblast and sumy oblast, and even then such an image of the russian, dull, distant, weak, and their army is not up to the army, and those whom they mobilize , are generally enough society perceived that we are supermen here, our warriors

are true , but that our enemy appeared, it directly shows that these are, you know, some inexpensive, small, short-sighted people who do not know how to fight. in reality, everything is not so . precisely because of the fact that we formed this ukraine at the expense of the president's office and these telethons formed such an image of a weak russian , the president's office would not like to lose its super-rating because they rely primarily on the number of ratings because they manage the state but they still haven't learned how to directly become statesmen, that's what's the problem and they look at these ratings and worry about those markets, they don't want to lose them at any cost, the blood of the ukrainian people of the ukrainian people. they want to get ratings despite the losses on the front. bakhmut should have been left a long time ago and retreated to the prepared frontier outside bakhmut

and calmly, taking into account the area that yes, i know that area very well, because i was there for one year in the previous years of the war. it was possible to equip an excellent line of defense there and calmly keep the enemy in the future and prevent his offensive even beyond the borders of bakhmut. well, on the other hand, we left the territory, and the ratings were preserved. this too i was there several times during the first period of the war, how much was left, i enjoyed the trust of the citizens, maybe not, that is, i just want to understand, maybe that’s not the idea, but the idea is that we can’t give anything back now maybe there is a fear that they will go further towards donbas well, the logic is simply too simple, the logic is too simple because they are for the ratings , that is why they are ready to give the whole of ukraine to the end of the day for the ratings, or are they not giving the opposite, on the contrary, i say that's exactly why

, too, illogical mr. serhiy says that they do not give bakhmut for ratings, what are they ready to give ukraine? they are not ready, no, they were ready to give ukraine right at the beginning of the big invasion. mr. serhiy, where does this information come from, it’s just interesting, the information consists of an analysis of the actions of the authorities in the previous months before the big invasion, what was not done to strengthen the defense capabilities of ukraine, and secondly , how did the russians directly prepare for the parade entry into the territory of our country, that ’s where this information comes from when in the first the day of aggression came - the president left, i said, i'm here , and the prime minister is here, and the head of the general staff is here , and we're all here, this is indisputable evidence that they did not want to win this war. well ok, no, listen, i think you just moved on to another topic

, and we still have a problem with you, why can't we move away from bakhmut, this is the main issue, in fact, it is a military issue - it is not a political issue, we will not solve it anyway , because we are not a member of the real headquarters, i think general zuluzhny has some opinions, there may be opinions, generals may have the same opinions, other generals are also wrong , in the same way, you can say if they left to criticize, and why they left during the war, it is very easy to criticize and say they left badly, no they left too badly. well, that's how i imagine it. although i'm not an expert . i'm serhii, please explain to us why it was possible to withdraw for ratings before, but now you can't. this is also an important point. well, first of all, i used to be unable to withdraw. we the fact that those territories were lost is precisely the first month of the great invasion, such a huge loss of territory in the future, these battles directly went for every

piece of our land, so it can be said or not, it is necessary to understand that during the war it is possible to cede some area at certain moments land, so that later with a tactical, tactical, fragmentary loss, we can achieve operational success, so for me, bakhmut, already taking into account the fact that this city has practically been destroyed in value, and directly as a defense area, such a point of resistance of the ukrainian army no longer carries such a positive mass. i understand that how much is there a day and not people are not positive for us, our task now is to save our resources, we will need resources in the spring for our counteroffensive, which we plan to conduct, and every person who has had combat experience and got the experience of these battles, including urban battles, task number one for us, let's see how many

wounded we have, and this is not a huge burden on our country, because the same wounded are tens of thousands of people on whom ukraine spends money, and thank god that they still exist, and our task is to significantly reduce the number of wounded and killed, because for us, i emphasize once again that the number one task is to protect the life of every ukrainian, to fight, that is, to fight with small numbers, not with meat, as they say, and to fight with modern means, primarily for the account of timely detection of the enemy and timely defeat of the enemy even on the distant approaches to the front edge. okay, well, please tell me, i would still like to analyze the topic of massive shelling, because again , you need to find logic. with the moods in society , so that society is disoriented, so that people

leave in the end, it is obvious, well, that is , whether it was successful or not, it was not successful, but they were counting on it. why make a massive shelling and by the way, it was warm to the central, i understand when they are on some other objects in march, that's why this is happening, it 's still a lot of money, no matter what, when you release all these daggers, the caliber they are not cheap, the task of the russians is in two directions, destroying our infrastructure is a critical structure, this is light, this is heat, and even if the winter is already over, we will still need resources to restore this infrastructure, and secondly, every raid they carry out is a missile raid, and they study the capacity of our air defense systems, how do we detect them, what kind of finn, we will destroy them, and due to this, they will in the future build new tactics and a strategy for the use of their means in order

to inflict even more damage on us in the future, and when we hear that everything is already over with them, i would not be enough to be so optimistic, they still have the number of missiles that they can push directly when their powerful offensive is already so planned. well , we have been waiting for the attack of some other missiles for six months already , and the missiles are all the same, we are already used to them we know approximately which ones we can, how to neutralize, which ones we can't, which ones we can do something , we can't, we don't see any results, and it would continue in the same way as with bakhmut, it continues in the same way with shelling , it continues, nothing new is happening . well, to understand that in

the heads of the general staff of the russian federation are completely incomprehensible. no, i am. that is why i am asking mr. serhiy, why not strike on something else, why destroy the thermal power plants in march? you look at this problem directly as a good analyst, but still, let's take a civilian direction let's look at you and they ask me, i am arguing that the task of the russians is to destroy our infrastructure much more widely and i am not surprised . i said more than two years ago that over time the russians will begin to destroy our bridges across the dnipro and we need to increase attention to the protection of these objects because it is real such a thing is critical for us regarding the connection with the affairs of the left bank , so i emphasize once again that by striking at our structure, they are studying our weak points and our speed of response, firstly, to restore the infrastructure, and secondly,

the destruction of their objects flying in our direction, mr. serhiy, and there is an opportunity to prevent attacks on bridges. well, of course, they are there, everything can be done, but three indicators of russian missiles tell why, why, then, many experts , the majority say that there are such missiles that are not able to stop any anti-aircraft forces in the world, there are some missiles , some daggers or daggers, or i don't know what they called there, please yes, air defense is not all strong, and it is precisely the task of correctly positioning and correctly protecting our objects and tasks number one is to detect objects flying in our direction on these tricks through the use of means of rehabilitation intelligence and whether we will then have time to react

or not it is not there it is another issue in war is not always you can hit the enemy sometimes he having certain weapons that are much more modern than ours can strike, they are primarily for us the task is to stop the enemy, it is still at the expense of our own resources to finish speeding up the production of a large number of unmanned aerial vehicles with enough with a large load of explosives in order to start actively bombing the russians at least to a depth of 500-800 km, but when we come out with systematic training on their territory with our means, it will speed up the russians' desire to end the war, and for now we are carrying out isolated such point strikes at the expense of a small the number of drone strikes on their territory does not stop them, it is an adequate response only in terms of the number of damage and their objects

. this is exactly what can stop them, so build up we need our capabilities as soon as possible in two directions, the actual production capabilities, and we have them. we still have enough excellent potential, and representatives of western countries are currently surprised by our capabilities and the bright heads of our designers, and secondly, after all, the diplomatic front is where to build up efforts to persuade to give us the impression of a much greater range , this is the number one task . which we dreamed of and expected, so far there is none, thank you, thank you, mr. serhiy serhiy krivonos of the armed forces of ukraine, first deputy commander

of the special operations forces from 16 to 19 years and ex-deputy secretary of the nsdc from 19 to 20 years, we will now move on to the events in georgia has enough of such icons. i would say that we will also be in touch. margarita khvalidiani, editor-in-chief of jam news serhiy kandelaki, member of the georgian parliament from 8 to 20 years old. good evening. let 's switch to russian. well, we can say good evening. i see many people. those who knows well, you always see yes, you know the ukrainian language yes, well, all georgians know ukrainian i am completely good evening перешёл молодец and there is yes yes that's great margarita georgy thank you for finding the time well let 's still try to understand in general what actually happened later what is the question here? why did the government introduce this law ? it was perfectly possible to predict everything that would happen next and why it revoked it. it knows

what will happen next. what is the logic in general? i want to always find logic. you know it is difficult to theory in general. in many political actions now, but you are looking for a family. let's start with you, margarita . well, logic is really difficult to find here, because the main idea is probably that they are trying to retain power, and most of all, they are interested in the idea of ​​staying in power. sides illogical action because the positions of the georgian dream were quite strong before these events and next year we have parliamentary elections extremely important and in principle they had quite strong positions they just needed them to keep instead of it, they turned away from themselves even the number of supporters

they had , that is, actions they applied it strangely then they canceled it with the same speed that what is also strange then they instantly canceled their second decision which caused great indignation calls students to the army that is logic logic is not enough, let's ask mr. georgy well, that's exactly the question, and the population of georgia, georgians, georgian nation so where will it return? so saakashvili is bad and

vanishvili is bad, who is good ? a crime committed by ivanishvili. good evening , i have a slightly different view. the process of georgia drifting into the kremlin's orbit , which has been going on for more than an hour , accelerated sharply with the beginning of the war in ukraine , if it had been able to achieve its goals as it intended, then this is

the process of transforming georgia into a full-fledged a satellite of russia would have happened, a small one would have been necessary. this is not what happened, and i agree on one thing that next year, the elections and the dream went on the classic console of any authoritarian regimes. and we decided to strangle the space and spheres over which it does not control, and in this case it turned out to be civil society but it is necessary to understand that this process and the process of transforming georgia into a satellite of the kremlin are very interrelated , in fact, it is one and the same process, so this all had a very very important political dimension, and it is not for nothing that after the recall

the reaction to this draft law, that is, moscow did not hold back and could no longer hide its indignation, even at the level of foreign minister lavrov simonyan and other propagandists who reproached the georgian government. why did the georgian government not accept the american law in quotation marks ? in itself played a very large irritating role, one of them is the spinal , but one of these symptoms is that the arguments that the georgian dream presented trying to explain why the important law is not that they were similar to the arguments used by vladimir putin himself 10 or 12 years ago when they approved a similar law, but these arguments were 100% identical copies. that

is why it is impossible to minimize the geopolitical significance and dimension of what happened in these days i am not on your question. that is, today the ministry of foreign forces of russia. it is as if she was trying to make some analogies with the maidan . of course , there are no identical analogies. the fact that there is no one leader or one structure that every day would already have this process, it was indeed a nationwide popular movement that went beyond some kind of bubble let's say active urban elites if it's