[000:00:00;00] probably discussed on the news in the past, in the last day, a colossal and very significant problem appeared in america with support for ukraine, and in the face of the republican candidate for the presidency on november 24, run the centes of florida , and he said yesterday that he does not support more military support to ukraine and this is a very important strategic problem not only because it has an opportunity , but i am afraid to say what kind of opportunity it is

, while it is a possibility somehow and such sentiments how is it against russia's support for ukraine and it's serious, well, you know for sure you heard that in the evening, just a few hours ago, there was information that was voiced by mr. nikolenko

, the spokesman of our ministry of foreign affairs, he officially invited rovno landing forces to ukraine in order to he came and looked and possibly changed his mind. our diplomacy does not sleep in february. public polls show that 40% of republicans in america are against military support for ukraine and 15% of democrats.

see, yes, i will kill you, there is a principled position, for example, of the head of the house of representatives, yes mr. mccarthy, here he publicly stated that he rejected the proposals of volodymyr zelenskyi , he said that in order to understand how the so -called unlimited check works, he does not need to go to ukraine. i think that makarte holds the position now, but he is specifically in the congress, this is after the elections to the congress, all he is doing is working with the agenda that he has come up with. to the elections and here, the big question is how he will change his worldview until next november, and he will be public, by the way, i doubt that he will come again, forgive me if it sounds cynical and sad, but again, i repeat that his position is actually somehow it depends more on potentials. how are these domestic disputes and those points of vulnerability of biden than

in fact it somehow relies on reason and the consideration of justice in relation to ukraine and it is very beautiful it is very sad but unfortunately it is politics and again i i will repeat that politically, this is the number one problem for ukraine, this is the american republican party, and it is a potential threat to the overall strategic support of america. on the scale on american weapons and money by british politicians, i mean those people who question the support of those

people who may sympathize in some sense with putin of russia or someone else. this is what a political picture is like in british politics. fortunately for ukraine, there are absolutely no such sentiments. there is absolutely zero sympathy for putin, because putin somehow poisoned the deal in his time. a violinist was poisoned, and in england in 2007 another one was poisoned, this is the former spy alexander lytvynenko, that is, what putin literally produces when a political

murder in the territory of great britain is monstrous. there are still some super-medinain voices, but this is absolutely not a political mainstream, and even somehow. there is no party that would even remotely sympathize with england firmly for ukraine, stay in touch, the alarm is now sounding in the kharkiv region, please, everyone, go to the shelter of the civil defense, all residents of the kharkiv region, the enemy is insidious, missile strikes are possible, this is constantly reported by representatives of various operational commands of the general staff, do not ignore this information. as you can see, the alarm continues to sound now on the territory of the luhansk region on the territory of the autonomous republic of crimea , the threat of artillery shelling in the nikopol district of the dnipropetrovsk region and the kharkiv region is also

alarming, yes, we continue the conversation with oun matthews , british writer , history, historian and journalist of the city of the un, now it is about the intensity of arms supplies to ukraine. mr. byrne , what did he mean? for the front if you heard this interview, you may have some explanation of what the director of the cia had in mind.

complexity. it seems to me that this is intelligence data about the defense force and some kind of real forecasts from the intelligence service from the intelligence network of the ktcru. how difficult will it really be for ukraine? that, unfortunately, russia defended itself very strongly and on all possible lines during the movement of ukrainian troops, and i think that the first thing he means is not that there will be difficulties in supplies, but that supplies that are real and that in fact already

go heavy armor in the first place unfortunately, this will not greatly simplify this task, and it seems to me that this is an indirect hint that the front may not move as quickly as ukraine hopes. unfortunately, in your opinion, it is worth adding here. because for a long time they harnessed the buffalo in terms of supplies, well, somehow they pulled in the hope of something or not, it is not necessary to add this prefix to the complete statements of the head of the cia, well, if you think, well, the problem is that if

you compare it with the military assistance that it was at the beginning of the year , that is, at the beginning of the russian invasion, and it was a javelin. no one in great britain believed that ukraine would actually be able to withstand a full-scale russian military strike at first, and in this sense, ukraine surprised the whole world, but what you call a slow-down of some kind of reaction, but it was still not as slow as that. quickly, it seems to me that there is a reaction to support, first of all, it is political

support, but the most important thing is material support. dollars, it's almost, it's already almost entirely russian wars, the military budget, and it's actually in these two months, the west is very strong when it mobilized, but the second question is that it will always be little . russian army and we forget that what lies behind this miracle is that somehow the small ukrainian army, which is many times smaller than the russian army at the beginning of the war, was able to withstand and in some places already repel russian aggression

it's great, but actually somehow it's practically somehow a task worth turning into the ukrainian army, it's an army that can resist in one hour, it's already happened to some extent, but it's not. it seems to me that it can't быть быстро mr. metyuzy thank you for joining the british writer, historian and journalist was on a live video link but every ukrainian knows the price of our servicemen with the blood of our servicemen every centimeter of our land succeeds every ukrainian knows that the first three days and the first three weeks and the first three months, a ukrainian serviceman, every ukrainian army, in general, the country of ukraine survived thanks to its zeal for independence , its strength, its patience, its strength, which is

then only strengthened by all these arms deliveries, but in the first place, the ukrainian soldier we continue vladimir putin lost control over the information space in russia came to this conclusion at the institute for the study of war, saying that in the kremlin there is a struggle for influence on the propaganda machine, this information is indirectly confirmed by the spokeswoman of the russian foreign ministry, maria zakharova, allegedly said that the kremlin cannot repeat the stalinist approach to the creation of a modern analogue of the soviet information bureau, and that the kremlin elites are preventing this process, and we will discuss this and not only now with our next interlocutor. greetings good evening good night a novel about loss of control i would like it to be so for all of us that he would lose it not

only in relation to the information space about well, there is always some, but did he really lose it, and if so, to what extent and why, what is your opinion? well, first of all, in russia , the information space is the information space of traditional media , that is, the television, the paper press is almost already absent, and the radio is also almost already you don't have anyone with influence and there is control, of course. everything is fine, but this is just this information bubble, which when putin first came to power was almost 100% . yes, somewhere in the year 2000, we only had 2% of the population scribbling information on the internet today, we have about 75% or more of political information on the internet in russia. these are the ones who receive information about current events from the internet in one way or another , be it social networks or the media, and there

was never complete control of putin there, and this is precisely because of the fact that television is gradually weakening, there is such a stereotype that most russians watch tv, they watch zombies but if you look at the real ratings, the coverage of the most popular programs, such as sunday night nightingale, is about 5-6 in in the best case, the population of russia, that is, respectively, 95% will not watch this program. so this is the silent majority , or as they used to call the aggressive-obedient majority, yes, it is not super progressive and it is manipulative, but it is not so that these propaganda channels are watched very much it is rather different from indifference than zombirovannostyu yes that is to say

, the passivity of the coach does not believe in one's own strength and the demand to be completely isolated from information, this is a distinctive feature of the majority of russians today, and in this sense, this is a problem for putin, of course, because when he does not need russians, and for the most part of the administration , they were completely unnecessary, that is, he pumps oil and further, so that no one gets out there, the main thing is if they are interested in politics, all the better, but when it is necessary to mobilize russians in including in order to supply new soldiers , it turns out that in general no one believes in the necessity of this whole special operation , what are they called? silent people who, in general, believe in this and do not want anything, well, these are very strange things, roman, you are saying, well, although i do not know, you are relying on perhaps some sociological research.

it is still similar to react to propagandistic narratives propagandistic narratives that are being spread, including you mentioned sokolov's show and who else's show is there, this 60 minutes is still there. entry to armenia was banned yesterday. how do the so-called foreign agents feel? what are their ratings? well, i would say that, in fact , trust in the first channel is about the same as in these media and agents. that is, usually a russian does not believe more or less anyone, although he certainly repeats probably some propaganda slogans simply because, well, go try them, don't repeat the conditions when you can be locked up for 5 years for an incorrect like, but my favorite

example is a poll on red square which was done by one of the bloggers who stopped random people there. he stops the guys and asks. and you are supporting the line of our government . yes, of course . what are you ready to do for our government? go there with your last name, because in the case of mobilization , we and the person simply runs away from the cameras, this is an absolutely typical reaction. we listen and watch. as only we need to do something for this, it turns out that faith is zero, and all this propaganda turns out to be completely powerless, and while the mobilization is only partially effective, that is, very few people are involved. the loss ratio

is not even one, but more than one. thousands of people, they must then understand why they are gathering there at all, why are we going there at all, and here it may turn out that there is no mobilization reserve from the several million people that the ministry of defense of russia reports to us about is simply not there, it will be absolutely impossible to drag there of these different types of propagandists and their cover , well, who is crushing whom, and i am talking about these different telegrams, we are youtube of these propagandists, such as girkin, aka strilkov, who is constantly chasing the ministry of defense, unfortunately, i don’t really know these guys from russia who are propagandizing there, but

the one who works for solovyov now, in which youtube has also been blocked by some noble man there , the whole profession has to look at all kinds of things, who works under whom today and how much do you get from this it is known that and to what extent they conflict with each other. well, there are several very serious groups, one of the most important, of course , the presidential administration, where the main person is gromov , who is responsible for the information agenda for censorship, and it accordingly extends to state channels and major newspapers, i.e. the presidential administration , there are several inside, like a tower in the presidential administration, someone controls the internet , someone controls the tv, but more or less it is one entity and they are of course they are very well synchronized, including through peskov and putin

, and putin follows this agenda more or less . it has a lot of influence because twitter is not the most readable social network in russia on a large scale, on a million-scale scale, so it is more like that in the media plane , it is noticeable in this one . and there are all kinds of telegram channels that also read journalists carefully, and for them it seems that tanya sets the agenda , in fact, they also have a very small coverage, even compared to, say, an insider yes, in which there are 5 million together with approximately viewing telegram channels - this is a tiny little bubble of information. that's right, but, in these bubbles , information is really boiling, there is a struggle between various clans, and we see that prigolzhen openly

criticizes the ministry of defense. kadyrov is also often engaged in this. but this is no longer a split in power, it is rather a struggle for a piece of funding within the system, because funding is now small and will become less and less, and a fight with elbows begins. to fight back from the private war of the company, the hotel will intercept it under its redoubt , they have started a fight there, kadyrov wants too, he also actively engaged us people from the most different regions in his battalion akhmat so this is more like a competition for resources. i do not think that this can be stopped that's a real political plane, roman. and please tell me , is prigozhin the kremlin elite, part of the kremlin elite or not? well, prigozhin was certainly created by the kremlin, he was initially and

remains now a kremlin cook, but he the presidential administration exists quite autonomously as an institution, that is, when we know and we are actually the first to write about it insider at the beginning of the 14th year when no one knew about it yet and already then it was clear that it was not fully synchronized with the presidential administration when there were incidents, for example, during the karabakh conflict, for example, when prigozhin openly supported turkey and azerbaijan, which completely contradicted the official kremlin agenda, at the same time , that is, all the turkish mass media emphasized prigozhina, where he means he praised erdoğan and so on, so he has a fairly serious degree of autonomy, but he will certainly never criticize putin, and none of these people will ever criticize putin , so this is all a fight of spiders in a jar, and i would not little attention to zakharova, who says that it is impossible

to create an analogue of the soviet bureau ; the kremlin elites are preventing this process. who does she mean, who is preventing the creation of an information bureau? человека, but they don’t tell us all this. they tell all this to a person who can listen and think. indeed, perhaps we still need some form of bureau and will give some money and resources for it, that is , this is again addressed to putin and his closest circle, that is, everything is being asked now, that is, everyone understood that now there is such a new wave of repression, a return to the scoop, and everyone wants to be the first in line to be given some kind of ministry of censorship or something else to have similar, and someone will surely receive another

the thing is that this is all happening on a sinking ship and they are very cool. now they will share some of the most prestigious cabins on this titanic. they will divide this pie over the pie, it's just getting smaller every six months, even so fast, it all ends here. roman, taking into account the numbers and the analytics, the data you receive, and according to your forecast, where will these repressions intensify? in the near future in which of the directions in the first place well, it is difficult for putin personally in this system, and what is happening in his psychopathic head is very difficult to predict, but loyko of the system definitely says that the cleaning of space will continue. well, how would it go smoothly it's just that we are not very noticeable in the process, and we will definitely compare

today's russia with what we said an hour ago . yes, when the special operation was just beginning . could imagine that as absolutely loyal and in general such a maneuverable alexey venediktov would leave the radio station and be declared a foreign agent . he had just taken a picture with mary zakharova and margarita simonyan. well, that is, in general, the whole layer of people who tried to be somewhere in the middle wink and ours simply disappeared из российского проставка i don't think that this is the end. i think that now the system will eat up their children . repression will begin against those who seem to be quite loyal. i think that we should expect it. further aggravation, but to be honest, this is my circle of society . yes

, that is, people who are somehow connected with people of democratic liberal views. or he left, this is already the beginning of their interspecies intraspecies intrasystem and who are they changing these people to ? evolutionary natural selection and we now see that people with such completely criminal thinking like the same beauty are winning in it . everything has become official, it is possible to speak now . yes, it is interesting that many people compare this system with soviet totalitarianism .

outspoken, some orc made some political statements and , for example, criticized the minister of defense openly , yes . still some understandable order of peace and tranquility, although nothing was impossible, that is, it was more like modern china, and current russia is more like feudalism, where everything is very unpredictable and where putin controls only so that everyone is loyal to him the main thing for him is that at a lower level there is a terrible gnawing and so far the most aggressive ones are winning . roman thank you for joining the broadcast . our colleagues viktoriya malosvitna and bohdan mashay will continue

to work for you , stay with us until february 24. territorial defense, i was a reserve officer in 2014. i could not go to war because i had just given birth to a child, so i went to the front. now 15% of the ukrainian army are women , they have proven that they are no different from the other 85% with their work, courage, honor and courage. there is no weaker sex in ukraine thank you military journalists i see the war from the other

side of the video camera thank you that from the first days of the war you show news from the front lines now we are in the positions of our artillery another gift thank you for exposing fakes the city does not seem like ours the troops reliably hold the defense with you , it's easier for us. thank you for risking yourself every day . it's very hot here so that people can see the truth