[000:00:00;00] er, despite those threats that have not disappeared, despite the fact that the war continues, it is obvious that this greatly weakened the country and it is obvious that it provoked russia that oh, this is a chance, this is an opportunity to do something with this country . by the way, taran has already left on his own countries in slovenia, if the words or slovenia, slovenia is the same for putin. we have already started talking about how putin went to this war, it is clear that 20 years of his rule in the russian federation was his way, his personal way , to subjugate ukraine, that is, he he staked his entire political career on the subjugation of ukraine, even his life, we can literally remember the year 2000 , the tape scandal, it is unknown who is listening to this office, it is unknown who threw these tapes and

the russian federation is getting a lot, i wanted to go there before the reversal of the president of ukraine back to russia viktor medvedchuk becomes the head of the kuchma administration of president kuchma viktor medvedchuk becomes the godfather of vladimir putin and dmitry medvedev through his wife later in 2004 , no one can blame yushchenko's poisoning with viaxin until now, to say who poisoned him and until the end, probably with the participation of employees of the security service of ukraine, who were obviously parallel employees of the fsb, and where satsyuk was the first deputy head of the sbu - this is medvedchuk's friend from business circles, even from banking structures. yanukovych congratulating yanukovych as president in 2004, putin made and in principle overturned the decision of the election center, the supreme court was the third round, then throwing russian money into the ukrainian party,

ukrainian politicians, ukrainian experts pumping in the interval between the fourth and tenth years, then the victory of yanukovych, then the arrival of people with passports of the russian federation, well, that is, this whole story, a long history, shows that putin has been preparing for this war for a long time, and that is, it is clear that he has accepted the period of uh, 2022 or they were already ready for this in 2021 as the most favorable time to attack ukraine and enter with troops. you mentioned that in 2019 we had a change of presidents, but it is obvious that you are the decisive factor in this situation. write in the book, it happened that this war turned into a people's war and the whole people is against putin's army went out to fight

. that's why now a quite logical question arises , why are we now in official documents? shall we say, valuable rhetoric, we do not use the term people's re-people's war because when there were two maidans, i remember very clearly how quickly the concepts were put into use , is it the orange maidan or the orange revolution and the revolution of dignity, why don't we say now when we hear the president or we hear high-ranking officials why no no there is no such rhetoric that this is a people's war is worse than no time unfortunately we see when they try to use some uh soviet memes soviet pockets for that war patriotic war the city is a hero that is, it is actually these soviet mites that seem to me will always work for the benefit of russia because they are invented by this very thing, they are part of this russian imperialist apparatus and believe in some power of informational

aikido, you know, that we will use it to our advantage this is not correct, in general, it seems to me that we lack some kind of such a hmm, a whole integrated information policy that would actually place the right emphasis on how to present this war to ourselves and to the world from the positives of what we managed to achieve this year this is a positive, first of all, of ukrainian diplomacy, well, it is obvious that president zelenskyi is that it seems to us that the war is not just between ukraine and russia , that it is a more global war, that it is still a war of the free world against russia, which threatens the free world, this is one of the biggest gains from the negatives, after all , she really didn’t outline any important accents of a particular ukrainian in this war , i am confused, for example. there is no ukrainian context. that

is, there are no references to history. there is nothing to say that president zelensky and the current leadership understand that the current war is part of this centenary the war you are talking about. they are the continuation of this war. this is really lacking. i think it is important. this is an important context that not only puts this war in the right place in the historical process, but also makes us stronger, that is, you show that in the context of this hundred years' war , in fact we are moving forward, in fact, the shine is closer, much closer than our predecessors to victory, perhaps this is because, unfortunately, neither president zelenskyi nor those closer, the immediate entourage of president zelenskyi’s team, they quite far from history, they are not the people who are interested in and are created for these people who are caused by history, that is why when you know , president zelensky is compared with churchill . and here, too, in many ways , the comparison is incorrect, starting from the fact that the one who itches, after all, has definitely brought victory

it is obvious to us that we need to win this victory in order to talk about it. the second thing is that he was an extremely historically involved politician, that is, he knew history very well, he wrote history, he created history. that is, he is a person who is very clearly understood the historical moment precisely because of the perspective of the past, unfortunately, now in the current head of state, most of those people who represent the leadership of the state are far from it. and this makes them a little weaker, despite the fact that, you know, our enemy has a very clear understanding of the historicity of this war, very a clear understanding that history is both the arena and this war , history is the tool of this war . meanwhile, we are weakening ourselves in this matter , we cancel necessarily from history in the national cartoon subject test we we hear very strange statements from the minister of education that history should not be studied under compulsion, it is best studied at

home . if we talk about the weaknesses that appeared during this year of full-scale invasion, this is just one of them, that is, not yet, not yet, not fully aware of the nature of this war, well, accordingly, yes , but i hope that this one will actually happen that's why i thought it necessary to make this book where and where to place the accents that i consider correct for myself, or it is clear that they can still be discussed, but it is important that this discussion be and i am very glad that as a result of my criticism of this the concept of a hero city, the minister of defense, mr. reznikov, supported the idea that it is still worth talking about the cities of heroes, not the city of heroes, that it is necessary to emphasize the people who defended this or that city, sometimes at the cost of their lives and not some abstract populations

point on the map of the country well, i understand what risks there are when the president will call the people's war, because it would be well if he clearly characterized this war and it is clear that he is the front man of this people's war. i understand that zelensky is the front man of the courageous ukrainian people who are now is fighting for its independence, but they also need, if they speak or compare churchill, to remember that after the war, he lost successive elections. that is, this is also a certain element, and what are the historical parallels, if they speak, then they have draw historical parallels and understand how it can end, it would be very good if ukrainians remembered that even from the point of view of the british, even despite the great respect for churchill, who won the war, after the victory of the war, there were fears that he might actually gain authority - grow into authoritarianism, so that the state would continue to be democratic, they decided to change it

, churchill did not even have the opportunity to finish his participation in these post-war conferences in potsdam, but if from the point of view in line obviously, it was insulting for sure, but from the point of view of the development of britain, it was an absolutely correct decision, britain has preserved itself as a powerful democratic state, mr. volodymyr, one of the pillars and foundations of the russian world in ukraine was and remains a branch of the russian orthodox church until march 29, a monk in kiev - of the pechersk lavra should leave this abode, as they say, and uh, leave the lavra , and this decision has already been made by the ministry of culture, and it is obvious that the monks will simply not give up because yesterday a record appeared as the moscow priests turn to zelensky and there is such an archimandrite, er, zacharias , who served in the church and sang in honor of russia, this video. i think many of our

viewers saw this, and zacharias said that he prayed in the lavra and because he said that the next president will be zelensky, well, on the eve of 2019, how did it all go? and what are the moscow priests asking for? the lord revealed to me that vladimir zelensky will be president. i called his friend mikhail. there have been no elections yet. you can . vladimir will be president. i told him all about it. he became the president

so that he would not offend our lavra but, on the contrary, protect it. well, there was another interesting episode. where does this zaharia say that he is a friend of this mykhailo, well, i don't know who was closest to zelensky, this mykhailo said that if he wins the elections, this is on the video for those who want to watch, you can google this appeal. he says that if zelensky wins, he said that he will be baptized in this church, well, that is, some strange statements. to be honest, how do you see it? on the other hand, now the papal stations around the lavra, not only the kiev-pecherska lavra, but also the pochaivska lavra, have already begun to return these monasteries to the state property, i am less confused now by all the papal dances, i am confused that, unfortunately, this pace that has taken the state in the context of not banning the russian orthodox church. for some reason, he got rid of it very much, starting with and remember the last two months before the new year, a few more weeks

after the new year, almost every morning, there are those epic photos of the russian orthodox church, which reminded us about the fact that the state is fighting against this structure. somewhere near some cathedral, the state, in the guise of its special services , is trying to stop the harmful activities of these e-e structures that operate under the banner of the rpc, but well, unfortunately, it stopped there . unfortunately, the draft laws that have been prepared in the parliament, which are even, er, er, i am one of the co-authors of the draft laws on the ban of the rpc, the main author. the committee on humanitarian information policy supported this law on the project, and for the second month , this issue is not even on the agenda. for me, this is a rather alarming signal that shows that

, unfortunately, the decision to stop the activity of this structure has actually not yet been approved, therefore all other things such as the deprivation of the opportunity to rule in or the eviction from the kyiv-pechersk lavra are of course important , but all these are not irreversible steps an irreversible step it will be precisely the adoption of this law which is still obvious so far, the obvious is being hampered with bankova street, that is why the leadership of the parliament will not dare to put them on the agenda. i think it is very necessary. that is, this political decision has an absolutely political solution and absolutely this one unfortunately, it shows that the desire to finish the final solution of this problem to the leadership of the state . so far, we have one more syncretism of the infamous pasha mercedes, this is pavlo lebid, he is

the abbot of the kiev-pechersk lavra he declared that the moscow priests would not be evicted from the lavra because it was illegal and appealed to history and covered himself with his parishioners, let's see, we do not intend to evict and we will not because now there are laws that are on the side of man and that is what threatens us that they are dealing with us, this is not the 17th year, today there is a global community, there is some kind of culture. we have not yet begun to pray so earnestly that the lord will show a miracle . probably, after all, they will force enough of what they have imposed sanctions, they are taking away citizenship, but all ukrainians cannot do this to believers today, once again i am appealing to those who have the right to do so, we are not against all legal actions, illegal actions

cannot be, although it is interesting. this is a person who built 36 buildings on the territory of the kyiv-pechersk lavra, a historical monument 'jatki and this is recorded by the audit service. he says that we will not, we will pray that he almost used putin there , we haven't even started and this and this this is a threat among other things why because we remember these processions of the cross what were her to the kyiv-pechersk lavra and to the pochaiv lavra, and i have a fairly simple question: can the moscow church, which is now in ukraine, because it is officially called the ukrainian orthodox church, well, it is a branch of the russian orthodox church, can they create an internal front in ukraine, that is, synchronously from the russian federation because the russian federation wants to go on the offensive in certain areas of the front. but can the church in this story and when the popes understand that their

business is being taken away because for them it is a very big business and when they understand that they will be evicted from the laurels from one from another and from other churches, can they under you parishioners and create an internal front that will prevent us from waging war with russia, because if they can, they can do anything if they don't nip this activity in the bud if it's not their desire to stop such a possibly provocative one activity it seems to me that it is not clear to me the pause with the adoption of the law regarding the prohibition of the russian orthodox church, it gives an opportunity to somehow recover in this church because literally december, january, eh well, we saw that eh, the russian orthodox church was not ready for such decisive actions on the part of the ukrainian authorities, now it seems to me that all these, even fragments of which you and i have now seen, are after all preparations for some kind of attack. i don't know what kind of form, what scale it

will be, but i absolutely agree with you. what is the probability that they will be able to somehow to at least try to diffuse the situation from the middle is very high. therefore, laws must be passed without delay, and those people who have already been identified as collaborators during the year of this full-scale war must be held accountable without delay, but i am convinced that if we dig deeper, we can clearly see very clearly how during many and for many years, this church was essentially an instrument of russian influence in ukraine , and you and i called the medvedchuks the environment and so on. this is a completely parallel story, which is no less powerful. influenced the internal political situation in ukraine in the context of russia's influence . well, this same story will seriously influence the internal situation in ukraine after our victory over russia. many parishioners go

to these churches during the war and it is clear that these monks are not only monks, priests in general are in these churches, they will conduct their politics and these pastors will tell something to the parishioners in this matter, we have already made a number of mistakes that can still be corrected, but which will have bad consequences after ukraine receives the tomos in 2019. in ukraine, a completely natural and correct process of the transition of parishes to the orthodox church of ukraine started in ukraine, it did not proceed at a fast enough pace, it was then accordingly, a law was passed on renaming this church to the russian orthodox church, and unfortunately, paradoxically , the ukrainian state became the name of this process, because once again the authorities in our country changed and president zelenskyi's entourage directly from the president's office intervened in the process of transitions and actually slowed down these processes of transitions to the orthodox church of ukraine. moreover, we saw last year a very strange letter from the leadership

of the security service of ukraine in the kyiv region of the regional administration of the kyiv region, where those were actually intimidated who prompted this during the transition to the orthodox church of ukraine , thank god, the leadership of the security service of ukraine has changed, and it seems to me that the new leader the security service, mr. baby, has a different attitude to this case and i hope that this kind of thing will not happen again. but nevertheless, this is already very, very much. hmm, a lot of wasted time, and most importantly, this necessary natural process of transition was simply suspended , it is obvious that again we are giving a chance to the russian church to recover and launch some kind of offensive. and i will ask you as a historian now, if not as a politician. i have been watching over the past 32 years how ukrainians have been trying to get rid of the russian orthodox

church, that is, in 1990 in october to kyiv alexy came, the patriarch who was before gundyaev, and he wrote a deed in kyiv and gave autocephaly. well, it seems that autocephaly gave some kind of autonomy to his church in ukraine, and at that time i was still a student among those who shouted out the moscow pope, and now for 32 years in it's all in my ears turn this away from moskovskii when i don't come to the russian orthodox church as i think every time well, if we were able to proclaim the act of independence on august 24, 1991 and the declaration of state souvenir in july in the 1990s, what prevented us from doing everything right from the beginning of independence with the church of bushi laret, who actually did the kyiv patriarchate

, who was cursed there in moscow, and why did this process slow down, why did we not get rid of it, knowing in principle that the church is one from the important elements of the influence of a foreign state, if it is a foreign church, not in our territory, you know, from a historical point of view, even the process of ukraine's loss of independence and the restoration of independence was shorter. because we say somewhere from the end of the 18th century to 1991, with a break, even up to 18-21 years , when the ukrainian state was still being created , that is, it is still a few hundred years, if we are talking about the loss of church independence, then everything started faster for another 100 years. 1687, if i don't i am wrong in essence, ukraine has lost its church independence. that is why we are overcoming somewhat deeper historical processes , that is why church independence lags behind

political independence, although it is good that they have already begun to catch up. it seems to me that in this context, receiving the tomos is just right here is somewhere a kind of analogue of church independence before the act of august 24, 1991, which is late precisely because we matured longer before this precisely because it is obvious that it is more difficult for the society to overcome those e by definition, by nature, it is a more conservative structure than politics. it is obvious that any process takes place there more slowly. but it seems to me that now there are all the grounds for talking about a mature church dependency of ukraine. that is, we already have an independent the ukrainian church and the orthodox church of ukraine and the ukrainian greek catholic church but at the same time, the russian orthodox church is also present here, that is, there is no longer any dominance of this russian orthodox church, but even its very

presence in ukraine is also dangerous, that is, here again - the parallelism of history, that is, we already have our own independent state , we have the armed forces of ukraine, which are on ukrainian territory. but at the same time, we are still reconquering this territory because there are also the armed forces of the russian federation here the essence of the church issue i will ask you now as a member of petro poroshenko's political team about the slogan with which we poroshenko went to the elections in 2019, the army is the language of faith, do you agree with the fact that, uh, last year, uh, volodymyr zelenskyi began to implement the slogan petro poroshenko in 2019 to a large extent yes, but i would like this slogan to be implemented in full because there are a lot of things that you and i talk about or talked a lot about the church, they are rather hm advertised and declared as what society really wants but we do not see some

the final decisive lessons with the language are easier, although i will remind you that about a year and a half ago, there were attacks from the presidential majority on the language legislation, systemic attacks from probably 10 attempts to change the legislation, we repelled them in this parliament now. somewhat easier because the obviousness of the need to support the army is clear to everyone, although again , the current authorities are again taking some logical steps, such as canceling payments to the armed forces of ukraine it is completely illogical, completely inappropriate and obvious that what demoralizes ukrainians and many soldiers, but in general , it seems to me that zelensky has understood that the army is the language of faith - it is not about elections. after all, these are some pillars of the foundation on which, in principle, it should be built the state is the historical framework in which the current ukraine should exist, that is, it is clear that the army is the language of faith and these are the pillars on which

the ukrainian state stands and must continue to stand and it will be uh, it is not limited to zelensky , regardless of that, he will be the next president will someone else be the next president? i am convinced that these are the pillars that will remain relevant for the future, and just as it happened with zelensky, ukraine is capable of digesting many politicians, and any president of ukraine has a chance to either become the ukrainian president or stop to be the president of ukraine now, zelensky has a sufficiently high rating well, it is clear that during the war he is the president of the war, although he always wanted to be the president of the peace we remember this pre-war rhetoric and yet in 2024, there are calendar elections for the president of ukraine. it is not known whether they will take place or not . how would you

like to see the future of the presidential future ? the circumstances are developing, and should he , for example, limit himself to one term and remain the president until the victory? this is his personal promise that he will only give for one term, that is, he talked about it. in fact, zelensky will be the president. the president for a second term or not will obviously depend on when the war will end, because even if we talk about victory, it is obvious that it will always be when when this victory will take place , all these high ratings that we see now are essentially built on credit we all believe that there will be a victory, and that the victory will come quickly, and that it is obvious that president zelensky can capitalize on the credit for this victory. but at the same time, it is very important now not to forget about some domestic political steps that are being made by the president's team, which are very far from such optimistic forecasts, which are very far from making ukraine stronger, because, well, as a member

of parliament from the opposition, i simply cannot ignore the steps that are aimed at further preparation of the entire structure of law enforcement agencies fight against corruption, when they are trying to bring to justice those people who changed the country for the better , that is, there will actually be a lot of challenges, first of all, internal political well we will keep an eye on it. thank you for the conversation, volodymyr. i will remind our viewers that it was volodymyr vyatrovych. i will remind you once again that today at svobody avenue 7 in lviv there will be a presentation of volodymyr vyatrovych's book, it is called our centennial , short essays, he continued the war , please come who is in lviv at the presentation and i will be so we are waiting for you at the presentation thank you all for your attention i wish everyone good health and take care of yourself and your

relatives goodbye will the ukrainian team of miners be able to continue the football fairy tale and reach the quarterfinals, watch the matches of shakhtar against penord and support us club exclusively on megogo fm galicia russian fairy tales used

to break into the air and were also reflected well what february is shocked by your cyber attack radio fm galicia prepared its response and heard our armed forces promised spring counteroffensive of the occupier, so the radio fm galicia will become a tool of informational spring counterattack, you will hear and even see life goes on, the war is going on , galicia is hard for the russians, for the ukrainians, there are moments when the body quickly loses fluid, which can lead to dehydration when, of course, there is not enough water, i save myself water for special medical purposes, the tenth ramstein, what aid for the armed forces ukraine agreed on at the meeting of the defense coalition on wednesday, will the meeting change the course of the war, moreover, the day before, poland said that it can supply mig-29 fighter jets to ukraine

within the next 4-6 weeks, this was confirmed by the country's prime minister mateusz moravetskyi, so what to wait for next and when there will be a spring counteroffensive war in the air, what is russia for shot down a us drone in the black sea, what are the consequences for the kremlin - this will have the secretary of the national security council oleksiy danilov believes that this incident shows that putin wants to expand the conflict zone and is going all-in. what will be the response of the united states ? the project is spoken by the great lviv platform, where everyone gets a say and everyone is heard on the air of the nta espresso tv channels, as well as in social networks, the great lviv